Virginia Apgar's original scoring system reserved a score of 2 for color only "…when the entire child was pink." However, Dr Apgar also said that color was "the most unsatisfactory sign" and "…the inherited pigmentation of the skin of colored children" interfered with this sign. We aimed to evaluate current knowledge of Apgar scores and perceptions of color among medical professionals.
A survey was distributed to medical professionals within obstetrics and pediatrics at two major medical centers; it assessed knowledge and purpose of Apgar scores and perceptions of skin color as it relates to Apgar scores.
The survey was completed by 61 participants: 37.7% (23) nurses; 41.0% (25) attendings, residents, or fellows; and 21.3% (13) others. A total of 32.8% answered questions about the purpose of Apgar scores incorrectly, and 29.5% answered questions about the most important components of the Apgar score incorrectly. When asked if a newborn's ethnicity was considered when assigning Apgar score, 34.4% said "yes" and when asked if "pink" accurately described the skin color of vigorous African American newborns, 57.4% said "no."
Our study shows that a large proportion of medical providers who routinely assign Apgar scores are not sufficiently knowledgeable about the significance of the individual components. There is confusion about the color component, especially for neonates of color who are not usually expected to be "pink all over" and are, therefore, likely to get a lower score. Consideration should be given to reassess whether "pink all over" is an appropriate descriptor of color for all newborns.