ArticlePDF Available

TELLING STORIES: A REFLECTION ON ORAL HISTORY AND NEW MEDIA

Authors:

Abstract

New media and the arts are transforming how we think and do 'oral history'. While the changes are many and the current situation is certainly fluid, the most exciting possibilities are emerging after the interview. This is an important point as oral historians have been so focussed on the making of the interview that we have spent remarkably little time thinking about what to do with the audio or video recordings once they are made. The paper examines how the digital revolution is changing oral history practice at the Centre for Oral History and Digital Storytelling, based at Concordia University, and specifically, in the Montreal Life Stories project. 'Life Stories of Montrealers Displaced by War, Genocide and Other Human Rights Violations', the project's full name, is comprised of forty university based researchers and community co-applicants as well as eighteen community partners, mainly from the city's Rwandan, Cambodian, Haitian and Jewish communities. Our five year project (www.lifestoriesmontreal.ca) is developing a cross-disciplinary methodology that combines oral history with digital storytelling, searchable databases and memoryscapes. We are also using new media technology to bridge distance within the project.
Spring 2010 ORAL HISTORY 101
The Deep Dark Secret of oral history is that
nobody spends much time listening to or
watching recorded and collected interview
documents. There has simply been little
serious interest in the primary audio or
video interviews that literally define the field
and that the method is organized to
produce. Michael Frisch (2008)1
New media and the arts are transforming
how we think and do ‘oral history’. While the
changes are many and the current situation is
certainly fluid, the most exciting possibilities are
emerging after the interview. This is an impor-
tant point as oral historians have been so
focussed on the making of the interview that we
have spent remarkably little time thinking about
what to do with the audio or video recordings
once they are made. There are hundreds of thou-
sands of recorded interviews sitting in archival
drawers, computer hard-drives or on library
bookshelves that have never been listened to.
Tens of thousands more have been supplanted
by the transcript which is easier to access.
TELLING STORIES:
A REFLECTION ON
ORAL HISTORY
AND NEW MEDIA
ABSTRACT
KEY WORDS:
voice,
collaboration,
sharing
authority,
new media,
databases,
orality,
memoryscapes,
digital
storytelling,
genocide
New media and the arts are transforming how we think and do ‘oral history’.
While the changes are many and the current situation is certainly fluid, the
most exciting possibilities are emerging after the interview. This is an impor-
tant point as oral historians have been so focussed on the making of the inter-
view that we have spent remarkably little time thinking about what to do with
the audio or video recordings once they are made. The paper examines how
the digital revolution is changing oral history practice at the Centre for Oral
History and Digital Storytelling, based at Concordia University, and specifically,
in the Montreal Life Stories project. ‘Life Stories of Montrealers Displaced by
War, Genocide and Other Human Rights Violations’, the project’s full name, is
comprised of forty university based researchers and community co-applicants
as well as eighteen community partners, mainly from the city’s Rwandan,
Cambodian, Haitian and Jewish communities. Our five year project
(www.lifestoriesmontreal.ca ) is developing a cross-disciplinary methodology
that combines oral history with digital storytelling, searchable databases and
memoryscapes. We are also using new media technology to bridge distance
within the project.
by Steven High
PUBLIC HISTORY
102 ORAL HISTORY Spring 2010
Analogue audio or video are ponderous to use
and take ‘real time’ to access – and are therefore
largely inaccessible to researchers and to larger
publics. As Australians Helen Klaebe and
Marcus Foth have asserted, oral history projects
‘rarely venture beyond recording interviews’.2
If the core audio and video recordings
remain ‘notoriously underutilized’, new media
tools are opening up many possibilities for us to
interact with the source. ‘The basic point could
not be simpler’ Michael Frisch writes:
There are worlds of meaning that lie beyond
words, and nobody pretends for a moment
that the transcript is any real sense a better
representation of an interview than the voice
itself. Meaning is carried and expressed in
context and setting, in gesture, in tone, in
body language, in pauses, in performed
skills and movements. To the extent to
which we are restricted to text and tran-
scription, we will never locate such
moments and meaning, much less have the
chance to study, reflect on, learn from, and
share them.3
The theme of the 2009 Oral History Society
conference is therefore a highly topical one as it
asks us to think deeply about voice: voice as
evidence in oral history, voice in community
through oral history, and voice in the age of new
technology. As is so often the case, this theme is
part of a wider rethinking of oral history practice
in light of the digital transformation underway.
Later in 2009, for example, the annual meeting
of the Oral History Association in the United
States is organized around the theme of ‘Moving
Beyond the Interview’. In the Call for Papers the
conference organizers ask us to think more about
what we do with the interviews once they are
made. The evidence of the growing emphasis on
voice and the post-interview can, therefore, be
found in many places. The potential implications
of these changes are profound. Alistair Thomson,
for example, has said that ‘digital technologies
are transforming so many aspects of our work as
oral historians – and indeed the ways in which
people remember and narrate their lives – that
they will, over time, also change the way we
think about memory and personal narrative,
about telling and collecting life stories, and about
sharing memories and making histories’.4
Before lumping me in with the ‘digital camp’
– let me say that I am first and foremost an oral
historian who values human connection and the
ethic of sharing. If new digital technologies help
me do my job as an interviewer, to listen more
deeply for meaning in oral narratives and to
share these stories with others, then I am all for
it. However, if the technology becomes the end
rather than the means – then I am not. To be
frank, I am sceptical of the missionary zeal of
some digital historians. Talk of open access and
the infinite archives, are often disconnected
from issues of collaboration and social change.
Like oral history itself, everything depends on
how we approach digital technologies and how
we use them. In other words, what informs our
technological choices?
It is for this reason that the 2009 theme of
‘hearing voice in oral history’ speaks to me. The
organizers chose to hear interviewee’s voices, to
be sure, but also community voices within oral
history projects and in digital environments.
This wider definition is an important one, and
is highly relevant to any discussion of oral
history and new media. Digital technologies are
opening up new horizons for community and
public engagement on the one hand and sharing
authority in the research process on the other.
I will focus my comments on how the digital
revolution is changing oral history practice at
the Centre for Oral History and Digital Story-
telling, based at Concordia University, and
specifically, in the Montreal Life Stories project.
‘Life Stories of Montrealers Displaced by War,
Genocide and Other Human Rights Violations’,
the project’s full name, is comprised of forty
university based researchers and community co-
applicants as well as eighteen community part-
ners, mainly from the city’s Rwandan,
Cambodian, Haitian and Jewish communities.
Our five year project (www.lifestories
montreal.ca ) is developing a cross-disciplinary
methodology that combines oral history with
digital storytelling, searchable databases and
memoryscapes. We are also using new media
technology to bridge distance within the project.
COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTS
I would now like to shift from the general to the
specific. The Montreal Life Stories project
received a five-year grant from the “Commu-
nity-University Research Alliance” (CURA)
programme of the Social Sciences and Human-
ities Research Council (SSHRC), the main
funder of academic research in Canada. The
CURA programme is a special one in that
communities are supposed to become partners
in research and not just objects of study.
Hearing
Interviewees’ Voices:
Mdm Genevieve
Srey being
interviewed by the
Cambodian
Working Group.
Spring 2010 ORAL HISTORY 103
Community participation in the research
process must therefore be real and sustained. In
other words, it is the perfect grant for commu-
nity-engaged oral historians who believe in the
power of ‘knowing with’ rather than simply
‘knowing about’.5It also provided us with a
challenge: how to carry forward the notion of
‘shared authority’ from the interview to subse-
quent stages of the research process? How do
we include a wider circle in the conversation?
The core principle of the Life Stories project is
sharing authority. You might call it our prime
directive.
Michael Frisch popularized the term ‘shared
authority’ in 1990 to describe the authority of
the interview.6Unlike the traditional authority
of the historian which is based on distance – the
more the better – the authority of the interview
is derived from the training, questions, and
distance of the interviewer AND the lived expe-
rience and storytelling ability of the interviewee.
Sharing authority is a complex process. Accord-
ing to Frisch, ‘A commitment to sharing author-
ity is a beginning, not a destination. There are
no easy answers or formulas and no simple
lessons’.7
To reflect more on university-community
collaboration, the Life Stories project sponsored
a February 2008 conference on sharing author-
ity in research. We wanted to see how other
projects shared interpretive power; and what
new media offered community-engaged oral
history. The resulting special issue of the Journal
of Canadian Studies, published earlier this year,
emphasized that collaboration need not end
once the audio or video recorder is turned off.8
Going digital often means making collaboration
a core practice. In her contribution to this theme
issue, film-maker Elizabeth Miller wrote that
scholars generally focus on the production-side
of things: producing books, articles, films, and
other outcomes.9Once one work is completed,
we move to the next. What would happen, she
asks, if academics spent ninety per cent of our
time finding ways to connect with various
publics? The same point can and should be
made about oral history. Collection is not
enough.
In practice, the technological choices for our
project were very much informed by our
commitment to a shared conversation. Yet one
of the most challenging problems afflicting large
projects such as ours is that of cohesion – how
do we ensure that there is a project-wide conver-
Hearing
Community
Voices: Holocaust
survivor Lisolette
Ivry responding to
a public screening
of a digital story
during the
Montreal Human
Rights Film
Festival;
Emmanuelle
Sonntag hosting
our weekly radio
programme; one
of our training
workshops.
104 ORAL HISTORY Spring 2010
sation while still working in our smaller working
groups and committees? The project has seven
working groups – four organized around specific
cultural communities and three others that are
organized around a specific field of inquiry
(Refugee Youth, Performance, Education). How
do we avoid becoming seven smaller projects?
A related problem is one of hierarchy. In
large projects, university professors often
become managers of research instead of produc-
ers of it. I call this the ‘trickle-down theory’ of
academia. Too often, graduate students are
doing the bulk of the research. This pattern is
particularly problematic in oral history projects
where the emotional connection and deep listen-
ing of the interview is paramount. Early-on, we
adopted a policy that everyone involved in the
project would participate in the interviewing as
either interviewers or videographers. And, I
mean everyone: co-applicants, collaborators,
staff, interns, volunteers, affiliates. Our hope
was that everyone would then feel it ‘in their
chests’ and it would further unite the project.
Our second decision was to adopt ‘Base
Camp’ project management software. The name
Base Camp conjures up an image of hardy
mountaineers battling wind and snow as they
climb Mount Everest. A proprietary service
hosted on the company’s own server, Base Camp
has become the project’s private online world –
each working group and committee has a space
set aside for it. Our to-do lists, timelines, and
files are in this space, as is much of our email
correspondence. The ‘People’ section shows
everyone in the project, about 130 people (give
or take a few).
When setting up our account, we could have
organised ourselves as a hierarchy – limiting
access. Ordinary team members might have
been restricted to their working group section.
Those of us on the Coordinating Committee
would of course see everything. Yet in the spirit
of transparency and sharing authority, we
decided that every team member would have
complete access to the site. Nothing would be
hidden. Folks would work in their own working
group but could visit any other part of the
project whenever they wished. We hoped that
this would cultivate a project-wide sensibility.
Base Camp also documents the process – the
roads not taken, internal debate and so on. All
of this will be part of the permanent archival
record.10
We also created interpretative spaces within
Base Camp. The project’s transcripts, chronolo-
gies and abstracts can all be found there, reports
too, but I want to return to how we tied Base
Camp to our interviewing process. In order to
break out of the collection mind-set, we required
all of our interviewers and videographers to file
a blog in Base Camp within 24 hours of the
interview. There are therefore two reflections for
each and every interview session, project-wide.
It has become a remarkable interpretative space.
New Media and
Collaboration: Base
Camp Software.
Spring 2010 ORAL HISTORY 105
Several hundred reports have already been
posted, including blogs from all seven working
groups. But it could be even better. We would
like to reach a point when other team members
read incoming blogs and comment on them,
asking questions and so on. This would trans-
form this part of Base Camp from a reporting
space to a vital space of project-wide exchange.
New media tools like Base Camp provide oral
historians with the means to manage large-scale
projects in a transparent and cooperative way. I
would go so far as to call Base Camp a commu-
nity-building tool, if approached in the spirit of
sharing authority.
DIGITAL STORYTELLING
I would now like to move to the ways in which
the Life Stories project is using new media to
engage various publics. One ‘platform’ for
participatory oral history is digital storytelling
on the internet.11
Our interest in coupling digital storytelling
with oral history originated in our commitment
to find ways to share interpretative power with
the interviewee in a meaningful way. We were
also looking for ways to use the oral history
interviews as a catalyst for public dialogue and
political action – to get their stories ‘out there’.
Digital storytelling has recently been described
as the emerging ‘signature pedagogy’ for the
‘new’ humanities.12 Writing in the journal Arts
and Humanities in Higher Education, Rina
Benmayer praises digital storytelling’s ability to
integrate critical thought and creative practice.
Digital storytelling is at the ‘crossroads’ of the
creative and the analytical, empowering students
and communities in the process.
So what is it? Digital storytelling is the act of
narrating one’s self through multimedia, using
widely available image editing software such as
Adobe Premiere or Power Point ‘to blend
together digitized still photographs and narra-
tive to create short, evocative, and informational
multimedia pieces’.13 These are usually highly
personal and emotive stories. Digital storytelling
is a multivalent term, ‘referring variously to
hypertext fiction, computer game narratives,
and various artist-led forms of narrative presen-
tation using multimedia and the Internet’.14
None the less, digital storytelling is usually asso-
ciated with the short autobiographical multime-
dia narratives produced during collaborative
workshops, a methodology developed at the
University of California (Berkeley) by the Center
for Digital Storytelling (www.storycenter.org).15
Typically, these workshops begin with each
participant providing a brief introduction and
‘preview’ to the story that they hope to tell.16 The
facilitators then take workshop participants
through the ‘seven elements’ defining a digital
story: point of view, dramatic question,
emotional content, voice-over, soundtrack,
economy and pacing. Participants then form
into a ‘story circle’ where digital story concepts
are shared, and feedback given. Workshop
participants are asked to write a script of 250
words. Once this is completed, they record their
voice reading these words and select the still-
images. The workshop ends with a final screen-
ing of the digital stories.17 As always, there is a
British-connection. In 2001 CDS-trained Daniel
Meadows established the BBC’s Capture
Wales digital storytelling project
(www.bbc.co.uk/capturewales ) that saw a
mobile production bus gather hundreds of
stories which were then posted online.18
However, the top-down and highly institu-
tionalized model propagated by the CDS has its
critics. Jean Burgess, for example, notes that
‘distribution channels for digital stories remain
limited and frequently are under the control of
the institutions that provided the workshops’.19
Unlike Web 2.0 environments such as You Tube,
Flickr, and Facebook, which are characterized
by self-directed expression, this workshop-based
approach is heavily scripted.20
So how then does digital storytelling connect
with oral history? To be sure, oral history audio
or video clips are becoming a regular feature of
many websites. How each clip is selected and by
whom is of central importance. From the outset,
the Montreal Life Stories project has enjoyed a
formal relationship with CitizenShift and
Paroles Citoyenne, the National Film Board of
Canada’s participatory web sites dedicated to
citizen engagement and social change. Since
2004, these web-based initiatives have explored
‘today’s crucial issues through films, photogra-
phy, articles, blogs and podcasts’. This outstand-
ing example of media for social change was
inspired by the NFB’s ‘Challenge for Change’
programme of the 1960s that involved commu-
nities in the documentary film-making process.
The NFB was brought into our project by a
faculty member working in education technol-
ogy. Its role was therefore initially conceived in
pedagogical terms – an online database of inter-
views ‘tagged’ for teachers, matching stories
with the curriculum requirements of Quebec. At
first, the partnership was therefore framed as an
online archive rather than as a digital storytelling
initiative. It took the project, and myself quite
frankly, some time to realize what this partner-
ship afforded us: namely, global reach and a way
to extend our relationship with interviewees
beyond the interview itself. Here, the process of
creating the digital story is critically important.
We could simply take stories out of the inter-
views, unilaterally, and produce digital stories
that speak to us. But I think it is far more inter-
106 ORAL HISTORY Spring 2010
esting to work with interviewees in the selection
of the clips. After the interview, we ask
survivors: what story would you like to tell the
world? This question forms the starting point of
the digital story-making process. I therefore
agree with Rina Benmayor when she writes that
without community or collaboration, ‘the digital
stories would not be as deep and powerful as
they are’.21
According to our guidelines, interested inter-
viewees are matched with tech-savvy young
people who work together to produce the digital
story for the NFB web site. Up to the present
time (June 2009), the project has ‘produced’
thirty-six digital stories, 21 in English and 15 in
French. There is a great diversity in content,
form and process. The most substantive digital
stories are those created by the Refugee Youth
Working Group and a 35-minute video entitled
‘Disrupted Childhood’ produced by a team of
five ‘digital storytelling’ student interns earlier
this year. I would like to speak briefly about each
of these initiatives.
Last autumn, eleven refugee youth, ages
sixteen to twenty, participated in a ten week-
long youth media workshop at the Maison des
Jeunes in the Cote-des-Neiges district of
Montreal. Led by film-maker Elizabeth Miller,
and co-facilitated by a youth worker active in the
Canadian Council for Refugees, the workshops
focussed specifically on photography and the
visual image. According to Gracia Jalea, a
student facilitator:
In addition to learning valuable media
production skills, participants were afforded
the opportunity to share their personal
stories as refugee youth living in Montreal.
Through photography and video, our partic-
ipants shared their personal histories, their
cultures, their families, their friends, their
communities, their social environments,
their schools, their passions, their concerns
and their hopes for the future.22
In effect, the project used young people’s
interest in digital media to bridge the social
distance and to create a space for digital story-
telling. Since then, the project has partnered
with a male refugee reception centre for new
arrivals. Participants are asked to draw ‘home’
and to share a story about the image. One would
be hard pressed to find a more emotive place
than home. The ethical issues involved in these
kinds of collaborations are of course pervasive.
For its part, the ‘Disrupted Childhood’ initia-
tive came as a result of an invitation of the NFB
to screen an extended digital story to mark the
20th Anniversary of the Convention on the
Rights of the Child during Montreal’s Human
Rights Film Festival. It was with this very
specific objective in mind that the team was
given the task of identifying six child survivors
from a range of cultural communities who had
already been interviewed and who agreed to
participate. Each intern then met with one or
two interviewees to do the initial selection of
stories. I must say it was wonderful to see
Rosalind Franklin meeting with Yehudi Linde-
man, a Holocaust survivor, in the oral history
lab. Both had their earphones on watching one
of the five interview sessions that I had
conducted with Yehudi. Rosalind later reported
on this encounter in her bi-weekly internship
report: ‘Our first meeting is three and a half
hours. Intense. We are editing the story,
segmenting it into two. First, mother and son.
Second, the senses.’ These two themes would
represent the strands of his story that were
woven into the 35-minute video. While this
initial step in the production of the digital story
was a continuation of the sharing authority
ideal, subsequent ones were more typical of
video editing. The screening drew a large crowd,
including two of the child survivors. Both were
part of the panel of discussants that followed.
To reflect more on the process, we asked the
interns to prepare a workshop during Interna-
tional Sharing Life Stories Day on May 16. To
this end, they prepared a power-point proposal
that asked us to extend the notion of co-creation
to subsequent stages of the digital story-making
process. Entitled ‘sharing authority: a tale, a
quest and a test’, the power point slides note
that ‘Gina’ – our fictional interviewee – starts off
as the authority and the teller of her own story.
Her authority, however, fades as the story
progresses. By the end, Gina is a ‘facsimile of
herself’.
The interns recommended that the post-
production process become more ‘seamless’ and
‘transparent’ to better chronicle the history of
survivor engagement in the post-production
process. Influenced by the work of Julie Cruik-
shank and Alicia J. Rouverol, they suggested that
the project turn to workshops to provide the
space for ‘reciprocal ethnography’ whereby
Poster for the public
screening during the
Montreal Human
Rights Film Festival.
Spring 2010 ORAL HISTORY 107
interviewees are engaged in the interpretation of
their own interviews.23 For example, the draft
digital story could be played-back to interviewees
and revised accordingly. Central to their proposal
was the idea of ‘shared authority coordinators’
who would accompany individual interviewees
through the process. It is a model that puts a
post-production person at the centre of the
process, rather than the interviewee- interviewer
relationship, which I have reservations about. I
also think that there is only so much that one can
ask of interviewees. That said, it is a good
example of the creative thinking about sharing
authority in practice that is going on within the
project. We are now developing a ‘framework
document’ that will outline our emerging
approach to digital story creation.
THE
STORIES MATTER
ORAL HISTORY
DATABASE
Despite the paradigm shift underway, oral
history is still a field that is very much grounded
in traditional archiving and document produc-
tion.24 Transcriptions have long been at the core
of our post-interview methodology and the key
to accessing pre-existing interviews. We don’t
generally spend much time with the oral source
itself. We therefore lose orality at an early stage
in the research process. Too often, we don’t
know what to do with the voice so we turn to
the transcript. We know that the voice is impor-
tant, but how do we study it? We know that
body language and facial expression are highly
meaningful, but how do we begin to read these?
In part, oral history database tools promise to
return the power of voice to oral history.
More than any other person, Michael Frisch
has voiced his concerns with transcription. The
spoken word is simply not the same as the
written word – too much is lost in translation.
Many of you are no doubt familiar with Frisch’s
article on the digital revolution published a few
years ago in the second edition of the Oral
History Reader.25 You may, however, not be
aware of a more recent article that Frisch wrote
for a qualitative methods handbook. In many
ways, it is a more interesting critique of our
attachment to transcription. Like others, he
writes that the digital revolution is opening up
new ways to ‘work directly and easily’ with
recorded interviews.26 Using these new database
tools, the interviews can be searched, sorted,
browsed, accessed, and the meaning mapped.
Michael Frisch has dedicated the last decade
of his life to this quest. He formed Randforce
Associates, a start-up consulting firm based at
the University of Buffalo’s innovation centre, and
identified Interclipper software as the best exist-
ing database tool available. Interclipper
(www.interclipper.com ) is a proprietary soft-
ware designed for mass marketing companies
interested in drawing conclusions from focus
groups. Randforce became the license holder
and began to work with oral history projects
interested in the new technology. Ruth
Meyerowitz and Christine Zinni’s project on
women trade unionists built one of the first inter-
clipper databases and tested it in the university
classroom. In 2004, students divided into groups
to work with interviews – clipping, annotating
and indexing.27 The results were promising:
The effect of close listening to the testi-
monies of the activists afforded by the new
media format is evidenced by how well
students remember details of the narrators’
stories. Fulfilling much of its democratic
promise, the program continues to lend itself
to appreciation of not only women’s subjec-
tive experiences, but impact on the public
sphere.28
At around the same time, I began to corre-
spond with Michael Frisch about the possibili-
ties of Interclipper as a research tool. As a result,
we began to build a database of displaced paper
mill workers using Interclipper software.29 Our
inaugural effort produced a modest database of
17 hours of videotape. In Autumn 2007 I
assigned the graduate students in my oral history
seminar the job of writing a critique of the data-
base. Each student was issued a CD-Rom and
the task of interacting with it. While I have
published on the results elsewhere, I can say that
the students exhibited a great deal of anxiety
about losing the life history context. Even though
the students completed a two-hour training
workshop and had access to a training guide,
they admitted to feeling disoriented and discon-
nected from the life stories before them. Many
lost track of who they were listening to as they
surfed the database. The exercise raised the
fundamental issue of the loss of life history
context in shifting to database. Yes, as Frisch
advises, oral historians can interact with the
source, directly, in a database environment – but
what is lost in the process? How might we re-
imagine the software so that we might retain the
life history context? As proprietary software, we
of course were powerless to modify Interclipper
in any way. We were also keenly aware of the
financial cost of the licensing fees. We also real-
ized that the Interclipper software was ill-suited
for our Life Stories project, as it operated on a
local computer rather than on a server.
It was at this point that we decided to take a
leap of faith and develop an open-source data-
base, in-house at the Centre for Oral History and
Digital Storytelling. I can tell you that we were
not ready to consider this possibility two years
108 ORAL HISTORY Spring 2010
earlier. The task seemed too daunting. I am not
a computer programmer and would have to rely
on someone else. Up to this point, we conceived
of our database work in terms of being a ‘user’,
or perhaps as a ‘test bed’ for the innovations of
others, not as a source of software development.
Our experience with Interclipper, and our
enriching conversations with Michael Frisch,
however, gave us a far clearer idea of what we
wanted in database software.
We therefore decided to employ a software
engineer on an eight month employment
contract as well as two ‘oral historians’ who
would be embedded in the software develop-
ment team. Our intention was to create a tool
‘by and for’ oral historians. A larger circle of
people, including myself, met every two weeks
for eight months. All team members posted their
reflections on the Stories Matter web site over
the life of the project’s first phase in 2008-9
(http://storytelling.concordia.ca/storiesmatter).33
As always, there were challenges. We soon
faced a choice: do we develop a downloadable
version like Interclipper or should the proposed
tool be web-based? On the one hand, a down-
loadable version would be of use to single inter-
viewer-researchers, including grad students,
without access to a server. On the other hand,
an online version of Stories Matter would be of
far more use to oral history projects such as
Montreal Life Stories that needed multiple data-
base builders and thus the ability to work simul-
taneously. A web-based version can also be more
easily accessed by communities. It is a tough
choice. In the end, we decided to do both. Phase
one (the downloadable version) was completed
in July and version 1.0 of Stories Matter is avail-
able for download. Phase two (the online
version) is now underway and we expect to have
it released by the end of 2009. I insisted on a
digital tool that retained the life history context
as much as possible. A short biography of the
person speaking is therefore always on the
screen, inviting you into the life behind the
words. The Life Stories project has now begun
to stream all our open access interviews into the
software. We will then clip and index.
MEMORYSCAPES, AUDIO TOURS AND
MENTAL MAPPING
The final dimension of new media and oral
history that I want to explore in this paper is
that of memoryscapes, or sound walks, that
enable us to explore places in new ways, what
Toby Butler has called the ‘multisensory experi-
ence of place’.31 Like others, Butler is interested
in exploring how landscape and subjectivity
intersect through the practice of walking. A
growing number of research projects have
sought to bring ‘mobility’ into the research
Stories Matter
Workshop,
International
Sharing Life Stories
Day, May 2009.
Spring 2010 ORAL HISTORY 109
process, ‘particularly in the investigation of
“everyday” life practices and lifeworlds’.32
Michel de Certeau’s notion of ‘spatial stories’ is
clearly resonating across the disciplines and is
being matched with such location-aware tech-
nologies as GIS mapping and GPS (global posi-
tioning systems).33 A memoryscape is the fusion
of space and time, much like Doreen Massey’s
notion of place as a time-space envelope.34
Places are not simply points on a map, but exist
in time as well. Memoryscapes make this fusion
explicit.35
Unfortunately, there has been relatively little
scholarly cross-pollination between oral history
and geography. Mark Riley and David Harvey
point out in their introduction to a special issue
of Social and Cultural Geography that in spite of
the field’s emphasis on memory, narrative and
subjectivity – place has been ‘largely treated by
oral historians in a superficial, Euclidian,
manner – a frame for research rather than an
active part’.36 We have, accordingly, not engaged
much with the theoretical work into place and
community. As a result, ‘some of the most exper-
imental and exciting work using sound and
spatiality has come from the art world’.37 A
growing number of arts-based groups, for
example, are exploring urban space through
walks, games and mappings.38
Once confined to museums, audio tours have
left the building and taken to the streets with the
emergence of MP3 players and the iPod. These
mobile technologies have ‘opened up new
realms of opportunity for people to narrate,
layer and intervene in the experience of moving
through place.’39 As Charles Hardy III notes,
‘[t]hose who would author in sound must learn
to “think” in sound.’40 The text-based approach
to telling stories advocated by the Center for
Digital Storytelling is thus a far cry from the
multi-media authorship of memoryscapes.
Two of the most exciting memoryscape
projects that I have come across are
located in London, England.41 In ‘Drifting’
(www.memoryscape.org.uk), Toby Butler let the
Thames determine the ‘collision points’ while
floating down the river in a small skiff.42 He
allowed the river’s current to select the sites: ‘the
flow gave me a strange, unfamiliar structure to
my beach-combing of river-related memories. It
gave me a fresh set of memory places.’ The
result is a three mile long walk along the Thames
with 12 different sound points (comprising one
hour of memories derived from 30 edited inter-
views). The second is Graeme Miller’s LINKED,
a trail along the M11 built through Hackney that
caused the displacement of 1,000 people.43
Miller’s sound trail consists of recorded memo-
ries from the displaced, broadcast from twenty
transmitters mounted on lamp posts along the
route (www.linkedm11.info/ ). The voices of
those displaced can be heard by passers-by who
carry a small receiver.
Not surprisingly, a sense of loss has moti-
vated a great deal of memory work in this field.
This is certainly true for Canadian historian Joy
Parr’s Megaprojects New Media Project, which
is exploring, among other things, the “lost
villages” of the lower St. Lawrence River
between Toronto and Montreal. When the St.
Lawrence Seaway system was expanded in the
1950s to permit ocean-going vessels to navigate
to the heart of the continent, water levels were
raised, flooding coastal communities such as
Iroquois, Ontario. As part of her project, Parr
was invited to set up a mock version of the lost
village-scape in a community hall and invited
former residents to see it:
Viewing these reconstructed streetscapes,
local heritage activists were courteously crit-
ical and suggested a community consulta-
tion. I laid out my approximation of the
drowned village on the bingo tables in the
community hall and asked residents to walk
amongst them making corrections with pens
and Post-It notes. After a time of reposi-
tioning and mending with scissors and tape,
a rough consensus emerged. A recent
municipal amalgamation left the hall rarely
used, and I was able to leave the streetscape
in place and conduct the interviews there,
following former residents who carried a
small digital recorder as they spoke about
what they remembered from their walks,
through the seasons, to work and school,
uptown and by the river. These prompts
were profound triggers to recall.44
This community-engaged exercise was then
combined with some new media ideas to
produce an online lost-scape. The team
attempted to find a ‘middle ground’ between the
open-endedness of databases and the linearity of
narrative. Parr’s memoryscape of Iroquois there-
fore includes ‘sense making strands of narrative’
from the stories told in the community centre.
I have likewise seen this shift from text to
authoring in sound in my own students. In
2007, for example, Jasmine St-Laurent and
Nancy Rebelo produced the bus 55 audio tour.
The idea was brilliant in its simplicity: Montreal-
ers were invited to download a 35 minute audio
recording of interviews conducted with
members of various immigrant groups associ-
ated with St. Laurent Boulevard – the city’s
historic immigrant corridor – and to board city
bus #55 in the Old Port area. As the bus travels
northward along Saint Laurent, you can hear
their stories, and perhaps see the city in a differ-
110 ORAL HISTORY Spring 2010
ent way. The project’s web site also offers a
downloadable pamphlet, a lesson plan and a
research report.45 Since then, other students
have produced soundscapes, walking tours, and
memory maps. Jessica Mills, for example, used
‘zee maps’ to map the memories of three long-
time residents of Point-Saint-Charles, a working-
class quarter of the city.46 My own thinking in
these matters has been profoundly influenced by
my students.
For my own part, I have been working
closely with Michael Klassen on a memoryscape
of a closed and demolished paper mill in Stur-
geon Falls, Ontario.47 Like many other single-
industry towns across Canada, Sturgeon Falls
has been ravaged by the forestry crisis. In the
wake of the mill’s closure in 2002, we conducted
sixty-five interviews with former workers. These
interviews reveal a deep connection to the mill,
as generations of family members worked within
its walls. Interviewees were quick to emphasize
that the mill’s closing was a collective tragedy
that belonged to no one individual. People spoke
in terms of the collective ‘we’ whenever possi-
ble. It therefore made sense to connect these
individual life stories, to reunite them in effect,
with the mill.
The project also benefited from my collabo-
ration with photographer David Lewis. We got
permission to photograph the interior of the mill
as it was prepared for demolition. We also had
access to 1,200 photos of the demolition taken
by former mill worker Hubert Gervais who
visited the site every single day during the six
months that it took to pulverize the mill and cart
away the debris. Other photographs and docu-
ments were copied from dust-covered boxes in
people’s basements.
With the help of the mill’s blueprint, we set
out to connect people’s stories to the factory
floor. Visitors can tour the mill from one area to
the next hearing audio clips telling of work
process, camaraderie, labour-management rela-
tions, and workplace accidents. To demarcate
change and conflict, we located stories about the
mill’s closing and the aftermath outside the
factory gate and beyond the fence-line where
cars were often parked during the demolition of
the mill. Old timers would sit there for hours
watching the mill go down. Stories of resistance
are there too, located at the factory gates where
protesters demanded that the mill be re-opened
in the weeks following the mill’s closure.
While making memoryscapes was not part of
the original vision of the Montreal Life Stories
project, it has since emerged as a new dimension
of our research. We are in the process of devel-
oping a series of free walking tours along the
lines of the popular ‘Jane’s Walk’. Named for
urban theorist Jane Jacobs, these community
walks are designed to help ‘knit people together.
In 2009, there were 263 tours in 24 towns and
cities including 74 in Toronto alone.48 These
tours explored a wide range of urban land-
scapes, ‘from social housing slated for redevel-
opment, to areas with a rich architectural and
cultural heritage, to teen hangouts and secret
gardens.’49 Anyone can be a tour guide – opening
the door to a wide range of subjectivities. For
example, ‘The Inside Scoop on Jane & Finch’
tour was led by a group of young residents who
wanted people to understand the neighbour-
hood as something more than its reputation for
gangs and youth violence. At this stage, we are
thinking of ways to engage with people’s
transnational stories of trauma and displace-
ment and connect them to the Montreal neigh-
bourhoods in which we live. We are using social
mapping exercises to map out where they live
and hope to incorporate arts and new media. At
this point, I have no idea how we will be
approaching next year’s Jane’s Walk. That is
what makes it so exciting!
CONCLUSION
To conclude, we have come a long way since I
conducted my first oral history interview in
1988. I had just returned to my hometown of
Thunder Bay (an isolated resource town on the
North Shore of Lake Superior in Northern
Ontario) for the summer months after my first
year away at university. Upon being hired by the
local museum as an ‘oral historian’ (at
minimum wage), I was given an impressive
number of blank audio cassettes, a very old
analogue tape recorder, and a clear set of
instructions: ‘go interview old people’. I had no
training of any kind. Even so, it was the best
summer job that I ever had. The recording
devices that I have used have changed since that
initial encounter. I switched from audio to video
The Sturgeon Falls
Mill-scape.
Spring 2010 ORAL HISTORY 111
in the mid-1990s and made the leap to digital
video five or six years ago. These changes are
not insignificant, but I see a great deal of conti-
nuity in the interview space itself. It is after the
interview where my practice has undergone the
most change. The meeting of oral history, new
media and the arts represents an incredible
opportunity for us to tell stories without losing
the voice of our interviewees. It also opens up
exciting new possibilities for community
engagement and sharing authority after the
interview.
NOTES
1. Michael Frisch, ‘Three Dimensions and
More: Oral History Beyond the Paradoxes of
Method’, in Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber and
Patricia Leavy (eds),
Handbook of Emergent
Methods
(Guildford Press, 2008), pp 222.
2. Helen Klaebe and Marcus Foth, ‘Capturing
Community Memory with Oral History and
New Media: The Sharing Stories Project’, in
Proceedings of 3rd International Conference of
the Community Informatics Research Network,
Prato, Italy. 2006. Accessed from:
http://eprints.qut/edu.au.
3. Michael Frisch, “Three Dimensions and
More: Oral History Beyond the Paradoxes of
Method,” in Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber and
Patricia Leavy, eds.
Handbook of Emergent
Methods,
New York: Guilford Press, 2008,
pp 223.
4. Alistair Thomson, ‘Four Paradigm
Transformations in Oral History’,
Oral History
Review
, vol 34, no 1, 2006, pp 70.
5. I have been greatly influenced by the work
of Henry Greenspan, On Listening to Holocaust
Survivors:
Recounting and Life History,
Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1998.
6. Michael Frisch,
A Shared Authority: Essays
on the Craft and Meaning of Oral History,
Albany: State University of New York, 1990.
See also the special issue of Oral History
Review on sharing authority: vol 30, no 1,
2003. For Canada, see Steven High, ‘Sharing
Authority in the Writing of Canadian History:
The Case of Oral History’, in Christopher
Dummitt and Michael Dawson (eds)
Contesting
Clio’s Craft: New Directions and Debates in
Canadian History,
London: Institute for the Study
of the Americas, 2009, pp 21-46.
7. Michael Frisch, ‘Sharing Authority: Oral
History and the Collaborative Process’,
Oral
History Review
, vol 30, no 1, 2003,
pp 111-112.
8. Steven High, ‘Sharing Authority: An
Introduction’,
Journal of Canadian Studies
, vol
43, no 1, Winter 2009, pp 12-34.
9. Elizabeth Miller, ‘Building Participation in the
Outreach for the Documentary The Water
Front’,
Journal of Canadian Studies
, vol 43,
no 1, Winter 2009, pp 59-86.
10. The East Mims Oral History Project in
Florida asks how technology can be used to
document process. Natalie M. Underberg uses
the phrase ‘reciprocal technology’ to describe
an ethnographic research methodology
incorporating new media. Natalie M.
Underberg, ‘Virtual and Reciprocal Ethnography
on the Internet: The East Mims Oral History
Project Website’,
Journal of American Folklore,
vol 119, no 473, 2006, pp 301-11.
11. Helen Klaebe, Marcus Foth, Jean
Burgess, and Mark Bilandzic, ‘Digital
Storytelling and History Lines: Community
Engagement in a Master-Planned
Development’. In
Proceedings 13th International
Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia,
Brisbane, 2007. Accessed from:
http://eprints.qut.edu.au .
12. Rina Benmayor, ‘Digital Storytelling as a
Signature Pedagogy for the New Humanities’,
Arts and Higher Education
, no 7, 2008,
p 188.
13. Christopher Fletcher and Carolina
Cambre, ‘Digital Storytelling and Implicated
Scholarship in the Classroom’,
Journal of
Canadian Studies
, vol 43, no 1, Winter
2009, p 110. For a sense of its pedagogical
value at the middle school level, see Pauline
Pearson Hathorn, ‘Using Digital Storytelling as a
Literacy Tool for the Inner City Middle School
Youth’,
The Charter Schools Resource Journal
,
vol 1, no 1, Winter 2005, pp 32-38.
14. Helen Klaebe, Marcus Foth, Jean
Burgess, and Mark Bilandzic, ‘Digital
Storytelling and History Lines: Community
Engagement in a Master-Planned
Development’. In
Proceedings 13th International
Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia
,
Brisbane, 2007. Accessed from:
http://eprints.qut.edu.au
15. Jean Burgess, ‘Hearing Ordinary Voices:
Cultural Studies, Vernacular Creativity and
Digital Storytelling’,
Journal of Media and
Cultural Studies,
vol 20, no 2, 2006, p 207.
16. Brian Landry and Mark Guzdial recently
examined the workshop methodology
employed by the Center for Digital Storytelling:
‘It entails writing and recording a script, editing
digital photos and video, and combining these
media to present a coherent personal story.
More importantly, digital storytelling involves
critical reflection on personal life events to
establish their meaning.’ Brian M. Landry and
Mark Guzdial, ‘Learning from Human Support:
Informing the Design of Personal Digital Story-
Authoring Tools’. Canadian visual
anthropologist Christopher Fletcher suggests that
‘working in narrative and visual modes
generates a complex intellectual engagement
that is at once creative, socially oriented, and
pedagogical.’ Fletcher and Cambre, 2009,
p 111.
17. Benmayor, 2008, p 188. The CDS’s
methodology is outlined in Joe Lambert,
The
Digital Storytelling Cookbook,
Berkeley: Center
for Digital Storytelling, 2007. See also: Joe
Lambert,
Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives,
Creating Community
, Berkeley, California:
Digital Diner Press, 2002.
18. D. Meadows, ‘Digital Storytelling:
Research-Based Practice in New Media’,
Visual
Communication,
vol 2, no 2, 2004,
pp 189-193; See also: Jenny Kidd, ‘Capturing
Wales: Digital Storytelling at the BBC’, PhD,
Cardiff, 2005.
19. Helen Klaebe, Marcus Foth, Jean
Burgess, and Mark Bilandzic, ‘Digital
Storytelling and History Lines: Community
Engagement in a Master-Planned
Development’. In
Proceedings 13th International
Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia,
Brisbane, 2007. Accessed from:
http://eprints.qut.edu.au
20. Helen Klaebe, ‘The problems and
possibilities of using digital storytelling in public
history projects’, In
Proceedings XIII International
Oral History Conference – Dancing with
Memory,
Sydney, 2006, p 9. Accessed from
http://eprints.qut.edu.au. See Helen Klaebe’s
doctoral thesis which examines new
approaches to collaborative public history using
arts and new media: ‘Sharing Stories: Problems
and Potentials of Oral History and Digital
Storytelling and the Public Historian’s Role in
Constructing the Public History of a Developing
Place’, PhD, Queensland University of
Technology, 2006.
21. Benmayor, 2008, p 198.
22. Gracia Jalea, ‘Reflections on the Cote-des-
Neiges Refugee Youth Workshops’, Montreal:
Life Stories Occasional Paper, no 2, February
2009. www.lifestoriesmontreal.ca
23. Julie Cruikshank,
Life Lived Like a Story,
Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press,
1990; Alecia Rouverol, ‘Collaborative Oral
History in a Correctional Setting: Promise and
Pitfalls’, Oral History Review vol 30, no 1,
2003, p 66.
24. Michael Frisch, ‘Three Dimensions and
More: Oral History Beyond the Paradoxes of
112 ORAL HISTORY Spring 2010
Method’, in
Historical Context of Emergent
Method and Innovation
, 2008, pp 221-238.
25. Michael Frisch, ‘Oral History and the
Digital Revolution: Toward a Post-Documentary
Sensibility’, in Robert Perks and Alistair Thomson
(eds),
The Oral History Reader,
2nd edition,
London: Routledge, 2006, pp 102-14.
26. Michael Frisch, ‘Three Dimensions and
More: Oral History Beyond the Paradoxes of
Method’, in
Historical Context of Emergent
Method and Innovation
, 2008, pp 221-238.
27. Ruth Meyerowitz and Christine F. Zinni,
‘The Medium and the Message: Oral History,
New Media, and a Grassroots History of
Working Women’,
Journal of Educational
Technology Systems
, vol 37, no 3, 2008-9,
p 310.
28. Meyerowitz and Zinni, 315.
29. Steven High and David Sworn, ‘After the
Interview’, forthcoming in the J
ournal of Digital
Studies,
vol 1, no 1, 2009.
30. The team members for phase one of the
project included Jacques Langlois, the software
programmer, as well as Stacey Zembrzycki,
Kristen O’Hare and myself as the ‘embedded
oral historians’. Erin Jessee, Claudia Gama and
Alison Eades were brought on-board for
database development and ‘de-bugging’.
31. Toby Butler, ‘Memoryscape: How Audio
Walks Can Deepen Our Sense of Place by
Integrating Art, Oral History and Cultural
Geography’,
Geography Compass
, vol 1, no
3, 2007, pp 360-72.
32. Jane Ricketts Hein, James Evans, Phil
Jones, ‘Mobile Methodologies: Theory,
Technology and Practice’,
Geography
Compass
, no 2, 2008, pp 1, 3. Shelley and
Urry, 2006, p 216, have heralded a new
‘mobilities paradigm’. They point to six bodies
of theory to buttress their central point. First, the
work of Simmel suggests the human will to
connection links people and places together.
Second, science and technological studies
emphasizes networks rather than things. Third,
the spatial turn in the humanities and social
sciences: social processes take place
somewhere. Fourth, the sensual experience,
emotional geographies and the study of the
body. Fifth, social network theory emphasizes
unpredictability.
33. The potential of GIS is explored in a
special issue of
Environment and Planning A,
vol 38, no 11, 2006.
34. Doreen Massey, ‘Places and their Pasts’,
History Workshop Journal
, vol 39, no 1,
1995, pp 182-192; see also: Brian Osborne,
‘Visualizing Public Memory’,
Top ia
, no 8,
2006, pp 117-120.
35. Mark Nuttall,
Arctic Homeland: Kinship,
Community and Development in Northwest
Greenland
, London: Bellhaven Press, 1992.
36. Mark Riley and David Harvey, ‘Talking
Geography: on oral history and the practice of
geography’,
Social and Cultural Geography,
vol 8, no 3, June 2007, pp 1-4.
37. Toby Butler, ‘A Walk of Art: The Potential
of the Sound Walk as Practice in Cultural
Geography’,
Social and Cultural Geography,
vol 7, no 6, December 2006, p 889.
38. Geographer David Pinder edited a
special issue of
Cultural Geographies
on the
‘Arts of Urban Exploration’. His introduction
examines how arts-based groups were
exploring urban space through walks, games,
and mappings. Brooklyn-based TOYSHOP, for
example, has undertaken a series of street
interventions: ‘This includes practices of
studying, representing and telling stories about
cities; it also involves ways of sensing, feeling
and experiencing their spaces differently’.
David Pinder, ‘Arts of Urban Exploration’,
Cultural Geographies
, no 12, 2005, p 386.
39. Toby Butler, ‘Memoryscape: How Audio
Walks Can Deepen Our Sense of Place by
Integrating Art, Oral History and Cultural
Geography’,
Geography Compass
, vol 1,
no 3, 2007, p 360.
40. Charles Hardy III, ‘Authoring in Sound:
Aural History, Radio and the Digital Revolution’,
in Robert Perks and Alistair Thomson (eds),
The
Oral History Reader,
2nd ed., London:
Routledge, 2006, p 400.
41. Butler, ‘A Walk of Art’, 2006, p 901.
42. Butler, ‘A Walk of Art, 2006, p 902.
43. Toby Butler and Graeme Miller, ‘Linked: A
Landmark in Sound, a Public Walk of Art’,
Cultural Geographies
, vol 12, no 1, 2005,
pp 7-88. For Janet Cardiff’s London sound
walks see David Pinder, ‘Ghostly Footsteps:
Voices, Memories and Walks in the City’,
Cultural Geographies,
vol 8, no 1, 2001, pp
1-19.
44. Joy Parr, Jessica Van Horssen, and Jon
van der Veen, ‘The Practice of History Shared
across Differences: Needs, Technologies, and
Ways of Knowing in the Megaprojects New
Media Project’,
Journal of Canadian Studies,
vol 43, no 1, 2009, p 39.
45. The impact of this MA project was
enormous, resulting in radio interviews and a
three page story in the Montreal Gazette (the
main English-language newspaper in the city).
http://storytelling.concordia.ca/workingclass/
46. Jessica Mill’s “What’s The Point” can be
found at
http://storytelling.concordia.ca/workingclass/
47. The mill-scape can be found at
http://storytelling.concordia.ca/high/
sturgeon_falls/index.html
48. Centre for City Ecology’s Jane Walk Web
Site. www.janeswalk.net. Accessed
18 June 2009.
49.
www.janeswalk.net/what_is”_janes_walk .
Accessed 18 June 2009.
... Generally, the oral history method is part of a naturalistic inquiry that is, mainly, focused on interviews and conversations with a purpose to give voices to participants' views and perspectives (Leavy, 2011, p. 3). Often oral history involves a primary data collection; yet it may also rely on a pre-existing archival (i.e., digital or physical) database (High, 2010;Leavy, 2011). Based on my research purpose, I decided to engage the pre-existing oral histories of Tibet Oral History Project (278 transcripts and audio oral histories) as my naturalistic inquiry (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005;Lincoln & Guba, 1985;Patton, 2002). ...
... It is important to note that the digital environment of pre-existing oral histories has many advantages and disadvantages. Some of the advantages are primarily in the context of access to diverse voices as evidence, and voices as communities (High, 2010). Voice as evidence is about the participants' lived experience that they choose to narrate in their own words and expressions. ...
... 305). In this view, the disadvantages of engaging the pre-existing oral histories are mainly in the lack of direct contact with the participants for the purposes of member check and collaborative interpretation (High, 2010). Preexisting oral histories are, usually, rendered through an analytical method and/or an impressionist method (Leavy, 2011). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
This study explores the precolonial cultural and historical context of children’s ways of learning before the advent of compulsory schooling in Tibet by the Communist Party of China (CPC) in the 1950s. The study focuses on local people’s lived experience shared in their voices. In listening to their situated learning experiences of childhood, we collectively learn from the elders’ wisdom. The research seeks to advance knowledge about unique aspects of Tibetan cultural heritage in order to raise educational awareness about children’s ways of natural learning. Study findings show that these ways were place-based cultural practices that led local children to experience existential happiness during childhood and ontological freedom as their self-subsistence. Such learning experiences will help all educators concerned with sustainability to understand how children (ages 5–14) have learned without schooling in the rural Utsang and Kham in Tibet, and why these personal experiences of sustainable childhood are important for them. In a broader perspective, the study is fully aligned with the Dalai Lama’s intention and the Tibet Oral History Project’s mission to sustain and preserve the cultural heritage of Tibetan people. Read the full text: http://artography.edcp.educ.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ShugurovaDissertation2017.-1.pdf
... The Concordia University Centre for Oral History and Digital Storytelling in Montreal, Canada" has also been publishing digital stories of genocide (e.g., Rwandan, Jewish, and Cambodian) survivors on its website. The website's page views showed that there were few clicks on interview recordings, prompting the institute to include DST, as the compact format of digital stories makes them more accessible to a wider audience (High, 2014). ...
Book
Full-text available
Anita Lanszki's book is about storytelling in the digital media environment. The enterprise is both classical in that it explores the nature of storytelling, which is found in all historical periods and human communities, and modern in that it undertakes a broad overview of contemporary digital culture from the perspective of storytelling. The book is also a methodological guide, illustrated with numerous examples, which has emerged organically from the author's many years of teaching experience. Although the title reflects a focus on the use of digital storytelling in various fields of higher education and research, this excellent work can also be used by professionals working in other spheres of education. Whatever our views on the digital space and age may be, we can probably all agree that we are witnessing a democratization of storytelling in our time. The insights in this book are therefore extremely useful for anyone who is interested in how the timeless practice of storytelling is adapting to the new media environment.
... It is clear that DST plays an important role in maintaining social memory as well (High, 2014). However, DST is more than recording testimonies and documenting oral history because it provides an opportunity for students to interpret, reconstruct historical events, and identify social positions through personal examples and a reflective presentation of life paths. ...
Article
Full-text available
The paper presents the results of an empirical study in which students (N=41) made digital stories in history classes in two different age groups. The aims of using digital storytelling in history classes were, on the one hand, to find and use relevant written and visual sources, and on the other hand, to create a personal connection to a historical person or event. The purposes of the research were (1) to clarify the conditions of applying digital storytelling in history classrooms in lower and upper secondary school levels and (2) to measure the impact of it on students’ learning competencies. The teachers wrote case studies, and students wrote learning diaries about their educational experiences. Students’ reading, writing, and listening skills were measured with pre- and post-tests. Throughout the project, the active involvement of students, their own learning activities, and creativity with digital tools were observed. We have found that the method creates a link between generations. Meanwhile, core competencies such as reading and writing were developed. The didactic limitations of using digital storytelling could be traced back to the lack of time, digital equipment and rooms.
... Вважається, що це зумовлено використанням «загального» або «специфічного» цифрового сторітелінгу (и ого зазвичаи пов'язують із медіапрактиками зазначеного вище Центру цифрового оповідання в Берклі) як різних варіантів методик і фасилітаторства. Але С. Хаи справедливо зауважив: «Незважаючи на зміну парадигми, усна історія, як і раніше, є дуже обґрунтованою галуззю в традиціи ному архівуванні та виробництві документів» (High, 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
The article presents the context of modern scientific debates around the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. The subject of the study is the common procedure of usage of oral history practices in the mass media space. The oral history itself is changing rapidly under the pressure of digital platforms such as StoryCorps (USA), Listening Project (UK), The Story Project (Australia) and The Tale of a Town (Canada). Another key thing is the fact that the changes affected not only the technological process of archiving and dissemination of information, but also basic foundations of oral history, which is its methodology. The in-depth interview is replaced by the "rapid response collecting" method and historical storytelling. Results of the research. Basic characterological directions proposed in the study allowed us to present the main points of discussion in various aspects: the use of oral historical materials, especially "hidden history" through the eyes of eyewitnesses, become an additional source of journalistic clarifications, investigations and expansion of the information agenda; addressing marginal themes of history, giving a voice to terrorist groups and participants in genocides poses extremely complex and ethically controversial questions to the audience; multimedia and multiplatform give new life to oral history information, while performance, theatre and participation are added to the usual practices of new media. The most expressive manifestation of changes in this interdisciplinary discourse is the practice of digital storytelling; its media use is illustrated by the BBC’s Capture Wales digital storytelling project. As part of the scientific discussion that has continued for the last few years, the issues of democratisation of history, mass inclusion in digital archives, the creation of powerful social projects and attempts to distance oral history as a separate discipline have been actualised. Moreover, it is recognised that, like any creative practice, interdisciplinarity remains a wide field for experimentation and creativity. Keywords: mass media; oral history; narrative; digital storytelling; multimedia.
... Вважається, що це зумовлено використанням «загального» або «специфічного» цифрового сторітелінгу (и ого зазвичаи пов'язують із медіапрактиками зазначеного вище Центру цифрового оповідання в Берклі) як різних варіантів методик і фасилітаторства. Але С. Хаи справедливо зауважив: «Незважаючи на зміну парадигми, усна історія, як і раніше, є дуже обґрунтованою галуззю в традиціи ному архівуванні та виробництві документів» (High, 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
The article presents the context of modern scientific debates on the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. The subject of the study is the common procedure of the use of oral history practices in the mass media space. The oral history itself is changing rapidly under the pressure of digital platforms such as StoryCorps (USA), Listening Project (UK), The Story Project (Australia), and The Tale of a Town (Canada). Another key thing is the fact that the changes affected not only the technological process of archiving and dissemination of information but also the basic foundations of oral history, which is its methodology. The in-depth interview is replaced by the “rapid response collecting” method and historical storytelling. The purpose of the article is to outline the discussion field of the modern scientific discourse of the problem, to present the most significant interdisciplinary interaction using the example of world and Ukrainian media, namely: coverage of contradictory and ambiguous interpretations of historical facts; narrative; prolonged communication; multimedia and multiplatform. The research methods are traditional empirical methods of observation and description, as well as paradigmatic analysis of the functional features of oral history practices in journalism. Results of the research. Basic characterological directions proposed in the study allowed us to present the main points of discussion in various aspects: the use of oral historical materials, especially “hidden history” through the eyes of eyewitnesses, become an additional source of journalistic clarifications, investigations and expansion of the information agenda; addressing marginal themes of history, giving a voice to terrorist groups and participants in genocides poses extremely complex and ethically controversial questions to the audience; multimedia and multiplatform give new life to oral history information, while performance, theatre and participation are added to the usual practices of new media. The most expressive manifestation of changes in this interdisciplinary discourse is the practice of digital storytelling; its media use is illustrated by the BBC’s Capture Wales digital storytelling project. As part of the scientific discussion that has continued for the last few years, the issues of democratization of history, mass inclusion in digital archives, the creation of powerful social projects, and attempts to distance oral history as a separate discipline have been actualized. Moreover, it is recognized that, like any creative practice, interdisciplinarity remains a wide field for experimentation and creativity.
... this reconfiguration also concerns the interconnection of information that lies within the archive, between the different types of archival material and also the interconnectivity between different archives. Furthermore, it concerns a more open access to archives, which determines the active role of social subjects/actors within the archives in a sense of "shared authority" (Frisch, 1990;high, 2010;cauvin, 2016: 216-226), towards the transformation of the archive into a public space and a public resource (Joyce, 1999), thus contributing significantly to their democratization (cauvin, 2016: 14) 9 . ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Ioannis Karachristos, Paraskevas Potiropoulos, Hellenic Folklore Research Centre, Academy of Athens “From repository to a living archive: a proposal for the documentation of ethnographic material in the HFRC archive”, in Karamanes Evangelos (ed.), Du terrain à l’archive: Les archives de folklore et d’ethnologie en tant que pôles de recherche, d’éducation et de culture, Actes du XXXIème Atelier du réseau FER-EURETHNO, Ière Conférence du Groupe de Travail Francophone de la SIEF, Athènes, 14-16 septembre 2018. In our paper, after a short overview of aims, research and studying methods of the HFRC, we discuss its contemporary policies concerning the HFRC archive, the creation and maintenance of digital records and their dissemination through on-line databases. Our aim is to propose alternative classificatory principles for the documentation of the ethnographic material that is reposited in the HRFC archive, principles that confront the challenge of both re-reading the archive and responding to the contemporary and future prospects. Our goal is to provide a modern “tool” that is compatible with international standards for the electronic (online) documentation of ethnographic material, with recent theoretical and methodological critical approaches and, finally, with the HFRC’s scientific tradition.
Article
This paper discusses the topic of hyphenated identity as it pertains to the Arab American community in central Ohio, U.S.A. It aims at highlighting the experiences of this minority group and bringing them to the forefront as knowledge creators. The paper focuses on creating and carefully analyzing a digital cultural record of Arab American voices. The paper uses the methodology of digital oral history to answer the following questions: (1) how digital oral history projects can help us understand individuals with hyphenated identities; (2) what factors shape the Arab American identity, and (3) what common practices are used by this group to balance preserving their identity and heritage, while integrating within White American culture.
Article
Only since the 2010s have historians become interested in dimensions of the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) histories beyond institutional, policy, and political narratives and the seventieth anniversary of the Service in 2018 gave additional impetus to work in this area. This paper argues for the need for a new interpretative framework for NHS histories that better reflects its multiple identities and social meanings. Drawing on a UK-wide programme of work it explores the processes of creating digital archive of NHS history using concepts and methodologies that foreground the institution’s social and dynamic nature and are underpinned by a commitment to inclusivity of perspectives and actors. It considers the challenges of working across academic, health, and heritage sectors and the need for historians to adapt to sharing power and agency when working alongside volunteers and interviewees. It concludes that the history produced through these ways of working is rich and insightful and has the potential to reshape historical practice and scholarship around NHS histories and beyond.
Chapter
This chapter provides summary and conclusions of the research findings from previous chapters that have located the ABC as an irreplaceable venue and destination for dialogue and nuanced debate in Australia. Yet, the process of digitisation within a globalised media ecology and shifting cultural concerns has exposed two issues: how the ABC needed to re-define itself in the changed and changing environment and that there had been failures to plan, manage and create policy that preserved and re-invested in the ABC’s reputational capital and cultural capital. This was a valuable vestige of its past, acquired in its former élite privileged field which was occupied by actors who believed in the ongoing and universal relevance and value of the ABC for all Australians seeking to pursue the national interest. The ABC had succeeded in that task such that it was treasured by a broad cross-section of Australians from many disparate backgrounds. The pressure from governments to digitise was met with enthusiasm by ABC leadership, yet the ABC then ran headlong into the emergent commercial digital field unaware of the dangers, trip wires and landmines ahead. In re-capturing its cultural capital it should re-build its confidence and habitus by forgetting about merging with the cultural practices of commercial media and transplant the ABC—its habitus, and its two most valuable assets: its cultural capital and reputational capital into a sub-field of the commercial digital field. Those have been at the heart of the institution’s hard won status, which offered differentiation and uniqueness. The ABC once resided in its own uniquely defined field and provided content that commercial interests were unable, or unwilling to make. It finds itself muddled, having forgotten to transpose itself as a publicly-paid sub-field into the emergent contemporary media and cultural landscape.
Article
Full-text available
What does it take for a modern man to understand his past comprehensively? With the progress of technology nowadays assuming an ever-rapid speed, oral history-one of the important means of understanding our ancestry-can be commonly encountered, though with different attributes of historical "illustriousness" marking each individual's testimony (depending on the context of a material's publication, as well as the historical background). Everyone has acquired new methods of expression, made possible by social media. An important testimony can now be recorded live and in real time (practically by everyone possessing a computer or mobile phone) with a very broad range of broadcast, thanks to the Internet. However, spoken history, whether in the traditional or digital realm, could also pave way for many erroneous impressions. As a result, one may hypothetically wonder how oral history stands up to the task of didacticism in our contemporary reality. Has it lost its value regarding popular history, or perhaps even taken a place not witnessed before? And how does it now affect an individual "user" as part of the digital humanities? Following the achievements in theoretical workshops in the fields of sociology, history, as well as cultural anthropology, this paper focuses on underlining the most important aspects of the presence of oral history in modern historical discourse, with regard 115
Article
Full-text available
A commitment to sharing authority is a beginning, not a destination—and the beginning of a necessarily complex, demanding process of social and self discovery. There are no easy answers or formulas and no simple lessons. What follows is an exploration into the methodology, ethics, and politics of university-community collaboration in humanities and social science research in Canada. Much has changed since the days when academics were taught that their authority was derived from distance—the more the better. The drive to include communities more meaningfully in research and, when possible, to share interpretative power is gaining traction in many disciplines.1 Community-based research has even been encouraged by funding agencies such as the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), which created the Community-University Research Alliances (CURA) program in 1999, 10 years ago this year. According to its current program description, SSHRC believes that by working together as equal partners in a research endeavour, postsecondary institutions and community organizations can jointly develop new knowledge and capabilities in key areas, sharpen research priorities, provide new research training opportunities, and enhance the ability of social sciences and humanities research to meet the needs of Canadian communities in the midst of change. The Community-University Research Alliances program is designed to facilitate such collaborations. Many other funding agencies such as the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation have launched similar initiatives intended to make communities partners in research and not simply objects of study. This trend is, perhaps, most apparent in the field of video advocacy and community media. Despite the exponential growth of funding for collaborative research from SSHRC and other funding bodies, there has been remarkably little discussion of the public’s place in the research process: how, when, and if authority should be shared between university-based researchers and community members (Savan 2004, 378–79; 2002; Reardon 2000). The central issue in collaborative research is its “practical application” (Frisch 1990, xv). What role does the public in all its variations play in research? How successful have collaborative research projects been thus far? How do we even measure success? In what ways have new digital technologies (blogs, digital memory banks, interactive video projects, digital storytelling initiatives, and Web 2.0 user communities such as those centring around YouTube or Flickr) been used to bridge divides? How might we share authority in the classroom? The desire to democratize the research process has deep roots. Many academics continue to be inspired by the participatory action research of Paulo Freire, who encouraged us to work with marginalized communities in the pursuit of social justice (Freire 1970; Greenwood and Levin 1998). Others have been inspired by “history workshop,” “active history,” “implicated anthropology,” “social museumology,” “community oral history,” “digital storytelling,” and the National Film Board’s Challenge for Change program of the 1960s. To be sure, feminist scholars have had a long-standing commitment to collaboration and political engagement—leading the way, for example, in the field of oral history in Canada (Baillargeon 1993; Sangster 1994; High 2008a). Community-based research is defined by the Loka Institute as research that is “conducted by, for or with the participation of community members” (Savan 2004, 372). It is our belief that the desire to democratize historical writing—broadly defined—has animated a growing number of people, both inside and outside Canadian universities. It has, however, met with a great deal of resistance. The theme of this special issue, Sharing Authority: Community-University Collaboration in Oral History, Digital Storytelling, and Engaged Scholarship, originates in Michael Frisch’s use of “shared authority” in 1990 to describe the dual authority of the oral history interview, comprising the lived experiences of the storyteller and the questioning of the interviewer-researcher. While the former derives his or her power from being there and...
Article
Full-text available
Some of the most experimental and exciting work using sound and spatiality has come from the art world. This essay traces how an exciting hybrid of sound art and walking - the sound walk - has evolved over the last century. Examining the latest examples of sound walks in London and New York, and reflecting on the author's experience of creating a sound walk route, this essay focuses on the potential of this medium to create flowing, multi-sensory and embodied ways for social and cultural geographers to research the outside environment. The essay concludes that the medium could also be useful for presenting site-specific cultural geography to the public in an accessible and inclusive way. Published (author's copy) Peer Reviewed
Article
This essay describes how a local story effecting one hard-hit Michigan town becomes part of an international collaborative effort in outreach. Shared authority in the outreach phase of documentary filmmaking is often over looked by academics and filmmakers alike. As an independent documentary filmmaker, the author uses her documentary film, The Water Front as a case study to explore the challenges and opportunities of using new media tools to maximize outreach efforts on a subject of international importance—water privatization. Abstract: Cet essai decrit comment une histoire locale concernant une ville du Michigan durement eprouvee est incorporee dans un effort de collaboration internationale de sensibilisation. L’autorite partagee dans la phase d’action d’information sur la production cinematographique de documentaires est souvent passee sous silence par les universitaires comme les cineastes. En tant que cineaste independante de documentaires, l’auteure se sert de son film documentaire The Water Front comme etude de cas pour explorer les defis et les occasions d’utiliser les nouveaux outils destines aux medias afin de maximiser les efforts de sensibilisation sur un sujet d’envergure internationale – la privatisation de l’eau.
Article
This essay argues that digital storytelling is a hybrid, multimedia narrative form that enables critical and creative theorizing. As an assets-based social pedagogy, digital storytelling constructs a safe and empowering space for cross-cultural collaboration and learning. As illustration, the essay analyzes in detail one student story, using as primary evidence the story script, visual images from the digital story, and excerpts from a recorded interview with the author. It concludes that the process of digital story making and theorizing empowers and transforms students intellectually, creatively and culturally. Thus, digital storytelling can be seen as a signature pedagogy for the new Humanities in the 21st century.
Article
This paper reviews critical developments in the international history of oral history and outlines four paradigmatic revolutions in theory and practice: the postwar renaissance of memory as a source for 'people's history'; the development, from the late 1970s, of 'postpositivist' approaches to memory and subjectivity; a transformation in perceptions about the role of the oral historian as interviewer and analyst from the late 1980s; and the digital revolution of the late 1990s and early 2000s. Threaded through discussion of these paradigm shifts are reflections upon four factors that have impacted oral history and, in turn, been significantly influenced by oral historians: the growing significance of political and legal practices in which personal testimony is a central resource; the increasing interdisciplinarity of approaches to interviewing and the interpretation of memory; the proliferation from the 1980s of studies concerned with the relationship between history and memory; and the evolving internationalism of oral history.
Article
In the Spring of 2000, Ruth Meyerowitz and Christine Zinni began collaborative efforts—inside and outside of academia—to enhance a course on The History of Working Women at SUNY Buffalo. Videotaping the oral histories of women labor leaders, they later teamed up with Michael Frisch and Randforce Associates—a research group at SUNY at Buffalo's technology incubator—staff at the Educational Technology Center, and The Uncrowned Queens Institute for Research and Education, Inc. to input and present diverse voices of working women into a new media program called Interclipper. To the group's knowledge, this was the first attempt to apply this new software technology in a university classroom setting for a course on labor history. Rendering oral histories as primary sources of service in the classroom, the new media format provided students with an alternative lens on working women's experiences—perspectives not normally gained in traditional text-based history courses. In the following narrative dialogue, Meyerowitz and Zinni trace the process and progress of their experiences with these technological applications for oral history use over 7 years time. Strengthening collaborative and decentralized aspects of classroom activities by allowing for more personal choices, involvement with the material(s) and active learning, the authors submit a multi-media, multi-perspectival approach to oral history intensified emergent and dialogical qualities of classroom interactions for students, instructors, and interviewees alike.
Article
This article is concerned with the history and practice of creating sound walks or ‘memoryscapes’: outdoor trails that use recorded sound and spoken memory played on a personal stereo or mobile media to experience places in new ways. In this relatively new and rapidly evolving field, the author brings together works from music, sound art, oral history and cultural geography as a starting point to understanding how such trails can give us a more sophisticated and nuanced experience of places. He suggests that this might offer some exciting opportunities for practice-based multimedia research and teaching. Published (author's copy) Peer Reviewed