ArticlePDF Available

Differences in adult phenology, demography, mobility and distribution in two syntopic ecotypes of Maculinea alcon (cruciata vs. pneumonanthe) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from Transilvania (Romania)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

We present a Mark-Release-Recapture study performed on the populations of two Maculinea alcon ecotypes in a Natura 2000 site from Transylvania, Romania. The Natura 2000 site harbours cultural landscapes with highly biodiverse semi-natural grasslands, among which several meso-hygrophilous meadows represent the only areas with 4 syntopically occurring European Maculinea butterfly species and two syntopically occurring ecotypes of M. alcon. Previous studies have shown that the two M. alcon ecotypes use different host plants and host ants; however our study is the first to focus on adult butterfly population ecology and distribution. In the case of M. alcon, conservation of the species has to consider the ecological needs of both ecotypes in order to be meaningful. The unique syntopical occurrence of both ecotypes makes population ecology studies in this area especially important for providing information for conservation management.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Entomologica romanica 18: 21-30, 2013 ISSN 1224-2594 / article no.: ER18201304
Differences in adult phenology, demography, mobility and distribution
in two syntopic ecotypes of Maculinea alcon (cruciata vs. pneumonanthe)
(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from Transilvania (Romania)
Natalia , Cristina , Cristian , Alexandra , László 
Summary: We present a Mark-Release-Recapture study performed on the populations of two Maculinea alcon ecotypes in a Natura
2000 site from Transylvania, Romania. The Natura 2000 site harbours cultural landscapes with highly biodiverse semi-natural
grasslands, among which several meso-hygrophilous meadows represent the only areas with 4 syntopically occurring European
MaculineaM. alcon. Previous studies have shown that the two M. alcon

distribution. In the case of M. alcon, conservation of the species has to consider the ecological needs of both ecotypes in order to be
meaningful. The unique syntopical occurrence of both ecotypes makes population ecology studies in this area especially important
for providing information for conservation management.
Key words: population ecology, mark-release-recapture, Maculinea alcon ecotypes, syntopic populations.
Introduction
Traditionally managed grasslands in temperate
Europe harbour a high diversity of plants and
       
of habitats ( et al. 2006). The abandonment or

their fragmentation and isolation has a dramatic
effect on species directly depending on these habitats
( &  2003). The species with most
specialised life cycles have experienced the most
       
combinations of biotic and abiotic conditions (
et al. 2007).
Maculinea van Eecke, 1915
(synonymised with Phengaris Doherty, 1891 by 
et al. 2007) are examples of myrmecophilous species
with a complex life-cycle, adapted to traditional
cultural landscapes that are threatened at European
level ( &  1992,  et al. 2005).
After a short period feeding monophagously on their
host plant, fourth instar larvae of Maculinea caterpillars
fall to the ground, where they are adopted by their
host ant species from genus Myrmica Latreille, 1804
( et al. 1998,  et al. 1999,  et al.
2001). The caterpillars possess a range of adaptations
that enable them to enter and exploit host ant colonies
( &  1992,  et al. 1999,
 et al. 2009) preying either on ant grubs
(“predatory” Maculinea) or being fed by trophallaxis
(“cuckoo” Maculinea) ( 1968,  et
al. 1991,  &  1992). Because
       
Rosidae families) and host ants of the genus Myrmica,
Maculinea

are considered umbrella species and their conservation
 et al.
2005,  &   2005,  et al. 2007,
 et al. 2007).
Presently most Maculinea populations are small
and isolated and occupy fragmented habitats, strongly
affected by human activities, mainly because of the
changes in agriculture over the past decades and the
abandonment of traditional land-use (
2001,  &  2004,  & 
2007,  et al. 2012).
Maculinea populations have been reported to
be declining in the Carpathian basin and Romania
( 1991, 1993), although, in the latter region, the
precarious economical situation largely maintained
traditional land-use systems with positive effects on
large blue’s habitats ( &  2008,  et
al. 2010,  et al. 2011). Thus in Romania we can
Maculinea taxa and in
several cases even occurring syntopically: Maculinea
arion Linnaeus 1758, M. teleius Bergsträsser 1779,
M. nausithous kijevensis Sheljuzhko 1928 and M.
alcon with two ecotypes ( et al. 2010, 
et al. 2010,  et al. 2011,  et al. 2012).
        
where the two forms of M. alcon co-occur: in the
22
Natura 2000 site “Dealurile Clujului Est”, Romania
( et al. 2008,  et al. 2011,  et
al. 2013).
There are 5 known European Maculinea species,

subspecies or ecotypes. Controversial taxonomical
changes pose problems especially between rebeli and
alcon, and widespread confusion of alcon ecotypes
with taxa xerophila or rebeli
literature (e.g.  &  1998).
Because of these taxonomical issues the taxa M.
alcon and M. rebeli are not mentioned on the IUCN
2013 Red list of threatened species.
In this study we aim to analyse ecological
differences and similarities between the two ecotypes
of M. alcon: M. a. ‘cruciata’ and M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’,
occurring syntopically but with distinct host plant
species, Gentiana cruicata and G. pneumonanthe,
in the unique Natura 2000 site from Transylvania
(Romania). But in advance, we need to clarify the
fact that under the name of M. alcon ‘cruciata’ we do
not refer to M. rebeli, M. alcon xerophila or M. rebeli
xerophila. As described by  (1904), M.
rebeli is an exclusive alpine species that does not use
Gentiana cruciata as host plant because this gentian
is not found in the type population distribution area
( 2008).
In order to insure the long term survival of these

that shape Maculinea population dynamics and
      
programs ( et al. 2005a). Thus, we applied
the mark-release-recapture (MRR) method to study
the adult populations of the two Maculinea alcon
ecotypes with the aim of gathering knowledge of
importance for their conservation. The only studies
previously conducted on the two ecotypes in the
      
et al. 2008) and oviposition behaviour ( et
al.          
gather population ecology data about phenology,
demography, mobility and distributions in the two
syntopically occuring ecotypes of M. alcon.
Materials and methods
Study site and species
Our research was carried out in the Natura 2000
site “Dealurile Clujului Est” (Eastern Hills of Cluj),
on a northern exposed meso-hygrophilous meadow of
ca
        
23.73E, 410-460m a.s.l., Cluj county, Transylvania,
Romania).
The study area is characterized by a mosaic of
two main vegetation types: Molinion caeruleae Koch
1926 in boggy depressions and Cirsio-Brachypodion
Hadac & Klika in Klika & Hadac 1944 in semi-dry
      
are Molinia caerulea, Sanguisorba ofcinalis,
Gentiana pneumonanthe, Ranunculus polyanthemos,
Carex tomentosa, Juncus conglomeratus, Serratula
tinctoria. For the second alliance, the dominant
and frequent species are: Brachypodium pinnatum,
Bromus erectus, Asperula cynanchica, Carex humilis,
Polygala major, Cirsium pannonicum, Centaurea
scabiosa, Ranunculus polyanthemos, Prunella
grandiora, Gentiana cruciata, Veronica teucrium,
Trifolium pannonicum, T. ochroleucon and others
( et al. 2011). The pasture was abandoned
progressively after 1990 and in 2011 was partially
mown (3% of the entire study area) ( personal
communication). In the period 2009-2012 the study
area was partially and intensively grazed by sheep.
    Maculinea species
cohabit syntopically: M. alcon (with two ecotypes),
M. teleius and M. nausithous kijevensis ( et al.
2011,  et al. 2013). The females of one of the
M. alcon ecotypes oviposit on Gentiana cruciata,
the other on Gentiana pneumonanthe. Since the
taxonomy of MaculineaG.
cruciata is not clear ( et al. 2006, 
2008), we prefer to call the two ecotypes according to
their host plants, thus: the form using G. cruciata is
referred to as M. a. ‘cruciata’, while the form utilising
G. pneumonanthe as M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’.
The two gentians used by M. alcon ecotypes as host
plants, co-occur in some patches, but G. pneumonanthe
has higher abundance in wet depression with Molinia
caerulea, while G. cruciata is more abundant in semi-
dry areas.
For M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ there is strong evidence
that the host ant species is Myrmica scabrinodis
( et al. 2008,  et al. 2013). The M.
a. ‘cruciata’ caterpillars were found (G. cruciata
patches) in Myrmica schencki and M. sabuleti nests
( et al. 2008).
Sampling method
The two syntopic populations of M. alcon
      
mark-release-recapture (MRR) method. The MRR
method was applied in 2010 on M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’
population and in 2011 both on an M. a. ‘cruciata’
and an M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ populations. Qualitative

were registered in the years 2009-2011.
      
every second or third day (with exceptions caused by
unfavourable weather) between 9:00 A.M. and 7:00

years between the 11 June – 9 August in 2010 and
2011. In the case of each capture/recapture, gender and
  
plant, sitting on food plants, oviposition, mating) of
the captured individual, capture time and coordinates
23
of the exact location were recorded. Coordinates were
recorded with a GPS device Garmin GPSmap 60 CSx.
In order to map the host plants of the two ecotypes:
Gentiana cruciata and Gentiana pneumonanthe, a grid
of squares of 50x50 m was established that covered
  
the grid was investigated and all individuals of the
two plants were marked with a GPS device (Garmin
GPSmap 60 CSx) in June and July both years 2011
and 2012.
Statistical analyses
MRR data from the years 2010 and 2011 was
analyzed to estimate the current population size,
        M.
a. ‘pneumonanthe’ and M. a. ‘cruciata’ ecotypes.
Data was analysed separately for each ecotype with
the Cormack-Jolly-Seber type constrained models
( &  1996,  & 
1999) using the program MARK 6.0 package (
&  2010). The performances of the models
were assessed with the Akaike Information Criterion
corrected for small sample size (AICc) (
1973,  &  1989). As recommended
by  &  (2001), after running
      
        
number of parameters.
Individual life span was estimated using the
formula ê=(1–φ)–1–0.5 (ê is the individual life span,
φ is the survival probability) ( et al. 2005b).
The parameters resulted from analysing the data
with the program Mark 6.0, survival and capture
probability, were used to estimate daily number of
individuals in each capture occasion (i.e. days of
capture) and recruitment of new individuals into the
population and the total number of individuals in the
two populations (of the two ecotypes).
We compared the number of marked individuals,
      
both years between the two ecotypes with a Mann-
Whitney U-test (with the program Past 2.09, 
et al. 2001), because data did not follow a normal
distribution.
Flight distances were calculated separately for
males and females within season as the distances
     
distances from same day recaptures for both sexes and
ecotypes using program ArcMAP 9.2. Comparisons
      
sexes were also computed with a Mann-Whitney
U-test (with the program StatView 5.0), because
datasets were not normally distributed. A Chi squared

www.quantpsy.org/chisq/chisq.htm) on the seasonal
         
evenly distributed on three and four, respectively,
distance classes (0-100 m, 101-200 m, 200-300 m,
over 300 m). For M. a. ‘cruciata’
we could not perform this test because sample size
was too small.
In order to compare the spatial distributions of the
G. cruciata and G. pneumonanthe plants and of the
adults of M. a. ‘cruciata’ and M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’
we overlaid a grid of 20x20 m over the map of
       
Quantum GIS 2.2.0 - Valmiera. Of these we randomly
selected 4 times 25 squares and counted the number
       
Correlation between the distribution of host plants
      
using Spearman Rank Correlation with the program
Past 2.09 ( et al. 2001).
Results
Phenology and population parameters
M. a. ‘cruciata’ 
between the 14th and 26th of June in 2011. Previous
observations from the years 2009 and 2010 showed
Figure 1. Marked individuals of M. a. ‘cruciata’(grey bars – data from 2011) and M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ (empty bars – data
from 2010, dark bars – data from 2011) ecotypes in the investigation area Fanatul Domnesc (Cluj County, Romania).
24

30th June at the latest. M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’
approximately 4 weeks, between the 11th of July and
the 7th of August in 2010 and 2011 (Fig. 1).
In 2010 330 individuals (204, 62% males and 126,
38% females) of M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ were captured
and marked. Of these 40 (12.1%) individuals (29
males and 11 females) were recaptured at least once
on a different capture occasion.
In 2011 294 individuals (225, 77% males and
69, 23% females) of M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’, and 165
individuals (112, 68% males and 53, 32% females)
of M. a. ‘cruciata’ were captured and marked. Of
these 20 (6.8%) individuals (16 males and 4 females)
of M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’, and 16 (9,7%) individuals
(13 males and 3 females) of M. a. ‘cruciata’ were
recaptured at least once on a different capture occasion
(Table 1). The number of marked individuals did not

Whitney U-test, p>0.05).
For M. a. ‘cruciata’ a population of 1073
individuals was estimated in the year 2011 with the
model Phi(.) p(t) (i.e. the model showing constant
survival probability and different capture probability
over time) (Table 2). For M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ a
population of 1277 individuals was estimated for the
year 2010 with the model Phi(.) p(g) (i.e. the model
showing constant survival probability and different
capture probability for males and females) and a
population of 1296 individuals for the year 2011 with
the model Phi(t) p(g) (i.e. the model with different
survival probability in time and different capture
probability for males and females).
The survival probability (Phi) was 0.85 (±0.09
SE) for M. a. ‘cruciata’, and 0.71 (±0.04 SE) and an
average of 0.54 (±0.34) for M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ in
2010 and 2011 respectively. The capture probability
(p) was on average 0.21 (±0.28 SE) for M. a. ‘cruciata’,
and 0.26 (±0.11 SE) and 0.33 (±0.22 SE) for M. a.
‘pneumonanthe’ in 2010 and 2011 respectively.
Individual life span was calculated at 6 days for M.
a. ‘cruciata’ in 2011 and at 3 and 2 days respectively
for M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ in 2010 and 2011 (Table 2).
Daily population estimates (Ni) for each capture
      
years for M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ and between ecotypes
in 2011 (Mann-Whitney U-test: p>0.05) (Fig. 2).
With the exception of M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ males in
2010 (unimodal pattern), for both ecotypes the adult
 Bi) have well-
      
is similar between years for M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’
and also between ecotypes in 2011 (Mann-Whitney
U-test: p>0.05).
Figure 2. Within-season daily population size estimates (Ni). Empty bars –M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ 2010, dark bars - M. a.
‘pneumonanthe’ 2011 and grey bars – M. a. ‘cruciata’ 2011.
Year Ecotype Marked individuals Recaptured Individuals* Recapture
Ratio (%)
Males Females Total Males Females Total
2010 M.a.’p’ 204 126 330 29 11 40 12.12
2011 M.a.’p’ 225 69 294 16 4 20 6.80
2011 M.a.’c’ 112 53 165 13 3 16 9.69
*individuals recaptured at least once on a different capture occasion in the same study site
Table 1. Summary of the MRR study on Maculinea alcon ‘pneumonanthe’ (M.a.’p’ ) and M. alcon ‘cruciata’ (M.a.’c’ ) in

25
Generally, captured individuals and also estimates
show a clear male–biased ratio. The sex ratio differed

2011 for both ecotypes (Table 2).
Mobility and distribution
     
between consecutive recapture dates) for M. alcon
‘cruciata’ was 100 m, and 97 m and 75 m for M. a.
‘pneumonanthe’ in 2010 and 2011 respectively. The
distances from same day recaptures were similar:
121 m for M. alcon ‘cruciata’ in 2011 and 97 m and
110 m for M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ in 2010 and 2011
  

and between ecotypes (Mann-Whitney U-test p>0.05
       
registered (distance between consecutive recapture
dates) was 345 m for a female M. a. ‘cruciata’.
       
than 200 m in both ecotypes and the Chi squared
        
2=34.9,
DF=2, p=3x10-8
200 m for M. a. ‘cruciata’ and up to 100 m for M.
a. ‘pneumonanthe’ 
followed the same unevenly distributed pattern on
distance categories with most distances under 200 m
for M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ 2=63.1, DF=3, p=0).
When comparing the spatial distribution of
the adults and host plants for both ecotypes we
    M.
a. ‘pneumonanthe’ and G. pneumonanthe (rs=0.67,
p=1.7x10-10) and a lower correlation between M. a.
‘cruciata’ and G. cruciata (rs=0.30, p=0.003). No
other correlations were found between distributions
of the two plants, between the distributions of the
two ecotypes and the distributions of plants and
irrespective ecotypes.
Figure 3. Within – season recruitment (Bi) in the populations
investigated. Broken line represent total recruitment
between consecutive capture days, squares – males and
circles – females.
Year Ecotype Model
Seasonal
population
size
Sex ratio
(males:females)
%
φ
pLifespan
(days)
Males Females
2010 M.a.’p’ Phi(.) p(g) 1313 52:48 0.712 0.32 0.20 2.98
2011 M.a.’p’ Phi(t) p(g) 1297 73:28 0.461 0.36 0.29 2.05
2011 M.a.’c’ Phi(.) p(t) 1073 68:32 0.845 0.21 0.21 5.98
Table 2. Basic parameters of the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model (p average daily capture probability; φ average daily survival
rate), population estimates (computed with MARK 6.0 program), sex ratio and individual life span in Maculinea alcon
‘pneumonanthe’ (M.a.’p’ ) and M. alcon ‘cruciata’ (M.a.’c’ ) populations, 
County, Romania).
26
Discussion
Phenology and population parameters
Our phenology results show that the two ecotypes
     
       
periods.
Considering our phenological data, the two
ecotypes from Transylvania were clearly separated
in each year by at least two weeks. Phenological
      
phenology of the two host plants.
The possibility of the two ecotypes being two
generations of the same species has to be excluded in
this case, as M. a.cruciata’ ecotype needs on average
11-23 months ( et al. 1998,  et
al. 2000,  &  2007, 
unpubl. data) and exceptionally (in optimal laboratory
conditions) at least 6 weeks ( 2005) for the
preadult development. Furthermore,  &
 (2007) found that only a 3 month period
of cooling triggered the completion of development
(i.e. an obligatory diapause) in both ecotypes.
Considering the population parameters, the two
ecotypes were similar in population size, survival,
capture probability and recruitment. Only individual
life span was considerably higher in M. a. ‘cruciata’,
with 6 days, compared to M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’ with
only 3 days.
2011 was characterised by lower recapture rates.
       
estimates in both ecotypes. However when population
parameters of 2011 were compared to those of 2010
for M. a. pneumonanthe   
were found. We have thus used these estimates in
order to check for possible differences between
population parameters of ecotypes, as the work and
analysis method was the same for both.
Both ecotypes showed a skewed sex ratio and a
bimodal recruitment in the year 2011.
 et al. (2005) suggested that a deviation
from the expected sex ratio can be traced down to the
higher recapture rates of males, due to the fact that

mobile females. Females, on the other hand, tend to

the undergrowth and may be easily overlooked.
After  et al. (2005a, 2009) the bimodal
      
period (Bi) indicates the presence of biannual
larvae. Biannual larvae were found in all European
Maculinea species: M. rebeli ( et al. 1998),
M. alcon, M. arion ( et al. 2000), M.
teleius and M. nausithous ( et al. 2006). Even
though our data shows a bimodal recruitment pattern
within season for both ecotypes, we found no larval
      Myrmica
colonies ( unpublished data). Also, larval
development in laboratory experiments with ecotypes
from the same area, never indicated polymorphic
growth rates ( unpublished data), in contrast to
 
developing larvae ( et al. 2000, 
et al. 2006).
Mobility and distribution
An increasing number of studies showed that
host plant development rather than host-ant presence

et al. 1997,  et al. 2005c,  & 
      

the distribution of the respective host plant. M. a.
‘pneumonanthe’ showed a higher density in patches
of G. pneumonanthe resulting in a higher correlation
     
M. a. ‘cruciata’ was more dispersed, similarly to
the host plant distribution, G. cruciata, resulting in a

two distributions. At the same time, distributions of
the two host plants did not overlap and correlations
between ecotype and irrespective host plant were not
found.
 &  (2004)
presented the hypothesis that M. alcon ([Denis &
Schiffermüller]1775) could also use G. cruciata apart
from G. pneumonanthe as an additional host plant,
by studying oviposition preferences. But their study
could not prove that eggs laid on G. cruciata could
sustain viable offspring, because only one larva was
found in ant nests in the vicinity of G. cruciata plants.
Also the study of  et al. (2013), conducted

Romania), showed clearly separated oviposition
behaviour and preference in the two ecotypes for their
respective host plant.
       
sedentary. Their limited mobility and distribution
overlapped with that of their host plant indicates that

two ecotypes of M. alcon
Domnesc (Cluj County, Romania).
27
they establish home - ranges, not moving far from
their emergence site. This phenomenon has been
reported also in other recent MRR studies for other
Maculinea species ( &  2008,
 et al. 2008,   & 
2009,  et al. 2011,  et al. 2013).
 &  (2008) suggested that
keeping close to the place of eclosion is an adaptation
of Maculinea
The establishing of home-ranges of Maculinea
     
A low number of emigrants increases the risk of
extinction of declining populations, and affects
the colonisation process dynamics ( et al.
2005a). Even though on rare occasions Maculinea
 
in colonizing new areas, the probability of such an
event is probably lower than the local extinction rate
( et al. 2005a).
Implications for conservation
Meadows that shelter more than 2 Maculinea
species are very rare. The habitats in the Natura
2000 site ‘Dealurile Clujului Est’ are probably
unique in Europe, because in some northern exposed
meso-hygrophilous meadows of this site four of the
European Maculinea taxons co-habit syntopically:
Maculinea arion, M. alcon ‘pneumonanthe’, M.
alcon ‘cruciata’ (also on southern exposed sites),
M. teleius and M. nausithous kijevensis. Such places
are particularly fragile because of each Maculinea

their conservation a hard task.
The presence and preservation of vigorous
Maculinea populations in the area has been fostered
over time through a randomized mowing regime of
the parcels owned by different farmers. In this system,
every year, a part of the parcels which harbour
fragments of Maculinea populations remain unmown
or are mown very late in summer, maintaining in this
way the metapopulational structure of the species and
having as a result the preservation of the large blues
( et al. 2011).
Their reduced mobility, home-range behaviour and
distributions closely connected to that of their host
plants all lead to the greater susceptibility to isolation
of populations through reducing their probability to
disperse and colonize new habitats in the two analysed
M. alcon ecotypes. Thus, habitat fragmentation by
land use increases the vulnerability of M. a.’cruciata’
and M. a. ‘pneumonanthe’.
The cultural landscapes and mosaics of secondary
habitats resulted from differently used meadows in the

is already threatened by factors such as short- and
long-term abandonment of traditional land-use (hand-
     
grazing (especially with sheep), drainage works and
local urban development plans ( et al. 2010,
 et al. 2011,  et al. 2011).
       
most threatening activities are abandonment and
intensive grazing. The abandonment of mowing and
grazing is likely to have a positive short-term impact
on Maculinea populations ( et al. 2011). The

species diversity in general is supported by the
studies of  &  (2000),  et
al. (2005),  &  (2007), and 
&  (2011). However, after 4-5 years, this
process will most likely go into reverse and cause the
decline of biodiversity  &  2007),
affecting the Maculinea populations as well. The
same, abandonment of heterogeneous mowing of
small meadow plots potentially leads to an alteration
of the metapopulational structure of Maculinea spp
( N. unpubl. data).
       
populations in abandoned hay meadows depend on
the intensity and type of grazing. In general, extensive
grazing with cattle can have a positive impact because
it prevents or slows down the secondary succession
towards shrubs and can therefore contribute to
     
For M. a. ’cruciata’ and M. a.’pneumonanthe’ in
particular, even an extensive grazing has a negative
impact: host plants with eggs can be easily eaten or
trampled by sheep ( A. unpublished data).
In order to protect the species diversity and the
viable metapopulational structures, there is a strong
need to develop strategies for maintaining the current
mosaic of habitats characterized by different stages
of succession ( et al. 2005,  et al.
2007,  et al. 2011), e.g. through more research,
support of traditional small-scale farming and active
nature conservation management.
Many studies emphasize the importance of
maintaining an interconnected network of suitable
habitats ( 1999) but also of habitat quality,
especially for sedentary species ( et al.
2001,  & Van Dyck 2005,  et al. 2007).
Conservation of the two M. alcon ecotypes should
aim at improving habitat quality. Considering their
low mobility, the spread of the local populations can

distance (i.e. 200 m). Habitat quality can be improved

like extensive mowing once a year, either few weeks

Within an interdisciplinary project funded by the
Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU; project
number 27559) a pilot agri-environment programme
was carried out in 2011 and 2012. This project offered
incentives to apply the earliest mowing on the 25th of
August and tractor and hand mowing was allowed.
The short-term outcomes of this project showed a

28
with the lower quality of hay, but on the other hand,
most farmers were encouraged by courses and regular
support, so that they willingly cooperated in the
project ( et al. 2012).
Maculinea 
the reduction in mowing earlier in the season. Thus, in
2012 a new package of the national agri-environment
scheme was introduced for a restricted geographical
         
genus Maculinea: Agri-environment package 6
Maculinea
spp”. This package aims at maintaining high habitat
quality for Maculinea
Euros/ha) can be received for all permanent grasslands
and the main requirements are: the earliest mowing
date on the 25th of August, mowing only allowed by
scythe or small hand mowing machines, grazing with
min 0.3 livestock unit/ha (0.3 cows /ha or 1.8 sheep/
ha) and max. 0.7 livestock unit/ha (0.7 cow per ha or
4.2 sheep/ha) (Axa II, www.apia.org).
This might be the beginning of long-term education
for agri-environment conservation in Romania;
however the long-term effects of this measure cannot
be estimated yet. The effective implementation of
such agri-environment measures often depends on
management of local administration and willingness
of stakeholders to apply for incentives and practice
the recommendations of the measures after NGO
support and educational programs are reduced.
Acknowledgements
          
distribution, to I. Paulini for her help with important
management information from the studied area and
to Z. Varga and M. Davies for important comments
on the manuscript. This work was granted from the
Sectoral Operational Programme for Human Resources
     
Social Fund, under the project number POSDRU
89/1.5/S/60189 with the title “Postdoctoral Programs for
Sustainable Development in a Knowledge Based Society“
to C. Craioveanu.
References
 H. (1973) Information theory and an extension
of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN,
Csaki F (eds): Second international symposium on
information theory, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 267–
281 pp.
 T.,  J.J.,  J.A., &  G.W.
       
Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica
ant colonies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences 266: 1419–1426.

) Population structure of a large blue
       
landascape. Molecular Ecology Vol. 16, 18: 3828-3838.
 E.,  J.,  A. &  Z. (2005).
Results of the mark-release-recapture studies of a
Maculinea rebeli population in the Aggtelek karst (N
Hungary) between 2002-2004. In: Settele, J., Kühn,
E. & Thomas, J., (eds): Studies on the ecology and
       
Ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea
      


Oedippus 3: 5-36.
 Zs. (1993) The threatened lycaenids of the
Carpathian Basin, east-central Europe. In: New T.R.

IUCN, Gland, 105-111 pp.
 O. &  A. (2000) Consequences of
succession on extensively grazed grasslands for
Central European butterfly communities: rethinking
conservation practices. Conserv. Biol. 14: 746-757.
 F., . S.,  J. A.,  E.
&  K. (2009) Acoustical mimicry in
a predatory social parasite of ants. The Journal of
Experimental Biology 212: 4084-4090.
 K.P. &  D.R. (2001) Model selection
and multi-model inference: a practical information-
theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
 E. &  G. (eds.) (2010) Program MARK “A
Gentle Introduction” (ninth edition). Cornell University,
US, 828 pp.
 C.,  G.,  L.,  A.A.,
 A.,  A.,  B. (2005) Alterations of
steppe – like grasslands in Eastern Europe: a threat to
regional biodiversity hotspots. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1606-
1618.
 Z.,  B.,  D. R.,  M., 
B.,  L. (2013) Differences in oviposition
strategies between two ecotypes of the endangered
  Maculinea alcon
(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) under unique syntopic
conditions. Insect Conservation and Diversity (doi:
10.1111/icad.12041).
 G.W.,  J.A. &  J.C. (1991) Larvae
of Maculinea rebeli     
Myrmica host ants: wild adoption and behaviour in ant-
nests. J Zool Lond 223: 447-460.
, G.W. & , J.A., 1992. Complexity of species
conservation in managed habitats: interaction between
MaculineaBiodiversity
and Conservation 1: 155-169.
, G.W., , J.A., , M. L. & ,

ant colonies provide exceptions to normal insect growth
rules. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 73:
259–278.
 Z.,  N.,  P. &  J. (2007)
     Phengaris-
Maculinea clade (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): total
evidence and phylogenetic species concepts. Systematic
Entomology 32: 558–567.
 A. M. &  D. R. (2010) Host ant independent
 Maculinea alcon.
Biol. Lett. 6: 174-176.
 J.C.,  T.,  W.,  M. &
    

29
rates of the endangered lycaenid Maculinea alcon.
Ecological Entomology 32: 536-543.
 H. (2008) Die subalpin-alpinen Lebensräume
des Bläulings Maculinea rebeli (Hirske, 1904) in den
Ostalpen (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Joannea Zool. 10:
143–164.
 O.,  D.A.T,  P.D. (2001) PAST:
Paleontological Statistics software package for
education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica:
4 (1): 9.
 I . (1999) Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford
University Press, New York.
 , 1904. Eine neue hochalpine Form
der Lycaena alcon F. aus den steirischen Alpen. Jber.
Wien ent. Ver. 11: 109-111.
       
 Pattern of genetic and
morphometric differentation in Maculinea nausithous
(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in the Carpathian Basin.
Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 58
(1): 7–103.
 T.,  P. (2008) Investigating movement
within irregularly shaped patches: analysis of MRR
data using randomisation procedures. Israel J Ecol Evol
54: 137–154.
 T.,  B.,  P., 
J. (2011) Do all inter-patch movements represent
      
in fragmented landscapes. J Anim Ecol 80: 1070–1077.
 C.M.,  C. (1989) Regression and time series
model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76: 297–
307.
IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version
2013.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 27
February 2014.
 K.,  M.,  J. &  J.
 
     Journal of
Appplied Ecology 43: 333-342.
 A.,  N.,  P.,  S., 
L. (2008) Restricted within-habitat movement and
time-constrained egg laying of female Maculinea
rebeli butterflies. Oecologia 156 (2): 455-464.
 D. &   H. (2005) Habitat quality and
biodiversity indicator performances of a threatened

in Belgium. Biological Conservation 124: 177-187.
 H. (1968) Freilanduntersuchungen über eine
ökologische Isolation zwischen Maculinea teleius Bgstr.
und M. nausithous Bgstr. (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).
Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten aus dem Burgenland 40:
65-68.
 P.,  M.,  P.,  J. &
 M. (2005a) Population ecology of
   Maculinea teleius and M.
nausithous and the implications for conservation.
Population Ecology 47: 193-202.
 P.,  A.,  U.,  A.,
 U.,  K.,  M. & 

for population size assessment in Lepidoptera.
Population Ecology 47: 203-212.
 P.,  M.,  P. &  M.
(2005c) Oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous
 Maculinea alcon Denis & Schiffermüller
(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in relation to characteristics
of foodplants and presence of ant hosts. Pol. J. Ecol.
53: 409–417.
 P.,  S.,  F.,  E. (2009)
Relative importance of density-dependent regulation

dynamics. Oecologia 161: 227–239.
 I.,  M.,  A.,  I. M.,  V.,
, A.  R.,  R.,  L., 
M.,  W. (2011) Grassland conservation
through CAP instruments – A Transylvanian case study.
2010 and 2011 summary report of the Mozaic Project.
www.mozaic-romania.org.
 I.,  M.,  M.,  V., 
E.,  N. (2012) Examples of local declines in
semi-natural grasslands, and how to monitor more
effectively: Studies in the SCI “Eastern Hills of Cluj”
(Transylvania, Romania). www.mozaic-romania.org.
 L. &  R. (2008) Distribution of Maculinea
genus in Romania. Entomol.rom. 13: 9-17.
 L.,  A.,  M.,  C. &  Z.
(2010) The Dusky Large Blue – Maculinea nausithous
(Bergsträsser 1779) in the Transylvanian basin: New
data on taxonomy and ecology. Nota lepid. 33 (1): 169
– 17.
 L. & 
suitable ecological indicator systems for restoration
measures of semi-natural calcareous grassland habitats?
Ecological Indicators 11 (5): 1040-1045.
 T. &  L. (2007) Changes of traditional
agrarian landscapes and their conservation implications:
Diversity Distrib.
13: 855-862.
 K.,  J.C.,  J. A. and
 G. W. (2000) Polymorphic growth rates in
myrmecophilous insects Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:
771-777.
 C.J. &  A.N. (1996) A general
methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture
experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52: 860–
873.
 C.J. &  G.A.F. (1999) Estimating animal
abundance: review III. Statistical Science 14: 427–456.
 J. &  K. (2003) Grazing and Cutting
Regimes for Old Grassland in Temperate Zones, in
Biodiversity Conservation and Habitat Management. In:
Gherardi F., Corti C. & Gualtieri M. (eds): Biodiversity
Conservation and Habitat Managment in Encyclopedia
of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under
the auspices of the UNESCO. Eolss Publishers, Oxford,
UK.
 M. &  A. (2004) Gentiana
cruciata as an additional host plant of Maculinea
alcon on a site in eastern Poland (Lycaenidae). Nota
lepidopterologica 27: 91-93
 M. &  A.M. (2007) Differences in
the development of the closely related myrmecophilous
Maculinea alcon and M. rebeli (Lepidoptera:
Lycaenidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 433–444.
 D.J.,  Z.,  R.T.,  K.,
 G.W.,  J. &  J.A. (2005) Science
and socio-economically-based management to restore
species and grassland ecosystems of the Habitats
30
Directive to degraded landscapes: the case of Maculinea
arion in Britain. In: Settele, J., Kühn, E. & Thomas,
J. (eds.): Studies on the ecology and conservation of
      
European gradient: Maculinea    
Conference proceedings, UFZ Leipzig-Halle. Ed.

 P.,  J.,  M. (2007)

in southern poland. Agriculture, Ecosystem and
Environment 121: 319-324.
 P.,  P.,  J., 
A.,  E.B.,  M.,  J.,
     
  
Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 8 (7): 662-669.
 F.M., - B.C.,  H.,
 A.,  K. &  E. (2006)
Maculinea alcon and ‘rebeli’ (Insecta: Lepidoptera:
Lycaenidae) – one or two Alcon Blues? Larval cuticular
compounds and egg morphology of East Austrian
populations. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums
in Wien 107 B: 165–180.
 A. (2005) Accelerated development of Maculinea
rebeli   
Nota lepid. 27 (4): 303–308
 A., D.R.,   S. and  Z. (2008)
Patterns of host ant use by sympatric populations of
Maculinea alcon and M. ‘rebeli’ in the Carpathian
Basin. Insectes Sociaux 55: 370–381.
 J.A. & 
Nature 432: 283-284.
 J.A. &  J.C. (1992) The capacity of a
Myrmica ant nest to support a predacious species of
Maculinea Oecologia 91: 101-109.
 J.A.,  N.A.D.,  R.T.,  K. E.,
D.J.,  G.S.,  R. and 
B. (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches

landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
Series B, 268: 1791 – 1796.
 J.A.,  R.T.,  Z.,  D.J.,
 K.,  G.W.,  J.C., 
J. (2005) Maculinea an myrmecophiles as sensitive
     
ants (keystone species) and other invertebrates. In
Settele, J., Kühn, E. & Thomas, J., (Eds.). 2005.
  
in Europe Vol. 2: Species Ecology along a European
gradient: Maculinea
     
Moscow, 28-31 pp.
 J. A.,  G. W.,  R. T.,  K. G.,
 M. L. &  M. E. (1997) Field
    
apparent competition between gentian plants and red
ants. Acta Oecologica 18: 671–684.
 J.A.,  G.W. &  J.C. (1998)
Maculinea
rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 265: 1895–1901.
 N.,  R.,  I.,  A.,  R., 

     
 Maculinea teleius (Bergsträsser
     
    
Insectelor din România”, Suceava, 24-25 septembrie
2010, în memoria entomologului bucovinean Ioan

 T. &  R. 1998. Die Tagfalter Europas
und Nordwestafrikas. – Franckh-Kosmos, Stuttgart. p.
319.
  F. &  I. (2009) What limits
       
their reintroduction: quality or spatial arrangement of
habitat? Animal Conserv. 12: 540-548.
 C.,  S.,  G.,  D., 
M.L.,  L.,  N.,  M., 
J.,  J.A.,  R.,  T., 
M.,  M., I. (2012) Dos and Don’ts

Union. Nature Conservation 1: 73–153.
 R.,  N.,  I.,  R.,  C., 
A.,  L. (2010) Demographic parameters of
two sympatric Maculinea species in a Romanian site
(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Entomologica romanica 15:
25-32.
 M.,  E.B.,  P.,  P.,
 J.,  M. (2006) Polymorphic
growth in larvae of Maculinea
of biennialism in myrmecophilous insects. Oecologia
148: 729–733.
Natalia 
(contact author)
Department of Taxonomy
and Ecology,

Clinicilor 5-7,
400006 Cluj-Napoca,
Cluj County, Romania
nataliatimuss@gmail.com
Received: 10.12.2013
Accepted: 22.12.2013
Published online: 28.12.2013
Published: 30.01.2014
Online article number: ER17201305
Alexandra 
Department of Taxonomy
and Ecology,

Clinicilor 5-7,
400006 Cluj-Napoca,
Cluj County, Romania
Cristina 
(contact author)
Department of Taxonomy and
Ecology,

Clinicilor 5-7,
400006 Cluj-Napoca,
Cluj County, Romania
cristinacraioveanu@gmail.com
Cristian 
Department of Taxonomy
and Ecology,

Clinicilor 5-7,
400006 Cluj-Napoca,
Cluj County, Romania
László 
Department of Taxonomy
and Ecology,

Clinicilor 5-7,
400006 Cluj-Napoca,
Cluj County, Romania
... Larva: VII-hibernation-V. Larvae development: after hatching larvae attacks the flowers and seeds of the host plants [60]. Flight period: 1G/year; VI-VII [14]. ...
... This species have been collected in 1940, being present in the Eugen Worell collection, but it was not observed any more; the distribution of this species in Romania is relatively unknown [58]. The species prefers lawns and hayfields, shrubs near the forests [60], and its decline and endangering may be due to the decline Gentiana lutea species [58]. ...
Article
The presented species of the genus Maculinea consist of individuals preserved in the collections of the Natural History Museum of Sibiu, but also recently collected by author in the field. Collecting has started more than a hundred years ago, in 1907. The paper mentions the endangerment degree of the species as well as possible causes and certain proposals to maintain their natural habitat.
... Phenological discrepancy between sexes can be compensated for by longevity of males, which is positively correlated with the degree of protandry 67 . Although in our study the estimated life span of males was lower than for females, it was still relatively high compared to other lycaenids [cf 17,80,81 ]. Furthermore, we did not find any differences in parameters between the two colour forms of females in contrast to Turlure et al. 82 , who studied polymorphism in B. eunomia and found that less-numerous andromorph females had significantly lower catchability www.nature.com/scientificreports ...
Article
Full-text available
Adult survival and longevity in insects are key life-history traits, but their variation between sexes and individuals in natural populations is largely unexplored. Sexual divergence in senescence, the decline in survival with age is also poorly understood. Based on an intensive mark-recapture dataset of the butterfly Polyommatus daphnis, we aimed to assess whether adult survival is age-dependent, and to estimate life span distribution and abundance of males and females using Cormack-Jolly-Seber and Jolly-Seber models. Female survival slightly increased with date of emergence and slightly decreased with age, while male survival considerably declined with age. Mean life span of females (12.7 days) was ~50% higher than that of males (8.5 days), but two times higher if only the oldest 5% of each sex was considered (39 vs.19 days). Abundance of females (358 ± 14) and males (359 ± 11) was similar, but peak abundance of males preceded that of females by 11 days. Our results suggest that senescence is much more rapid in males than in females in this butterfly, which is in agreement with sexual selection theory. We also conclude that estimating life span distributions provides much more valuable information on the demography of natural populations than simply reporting the mean life span.
... This is also a characteristic of Maculinea populations. Although Maculinea are quite limited in their dispersal when examined using mark-release-recapture techniques or behavioural observations [119][120][121][122], their genetic structure suggests occasional long-distance dispersal [123][124][125][126], so allowing the maintenance of the genetic diversity required for coevolution across a wide geographic area. ...
Article
Full-text available
The range of hosts exploited by a parasite is determined by several factors, including host availability, infectivity and exploitability. Each of these can be the target of natural selection on both host and parasite, which will determine the local outcome of interactions, and potentially lead to coevolution. However, geographical variation in host use and specificity has rarely been investigated. Maculinea (= Phengaris ) butterflies are brood parasites of Myrmica ants that are patchily distributed across the Palæarctic and have been studied extensively in Europe. Here, we review the published records of ant host use by the European Maculinea species, as well as providing new host ant records for more than 100 sites across Europe. This comprehensive survey demonstrates that while all but one of the Myrmica species found on Maculinea sites have been recorded as hosts, the most common is often disproportionately highly exploited. Host sharing and host switching are both relatively common, but there is evidence of specialization at many sites, which varies among Maculinea species. We show that most Maculinea display the features expected for coevolution to occur in a geographic mosaic, which has probably allowed these rare butterflies to persist in Europe. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: from mechanism to pattern’.
... Considerable differences in individual life span between ecotypes were reported in studies on Phengaris alcon, with the form related to xerothermic grasslands (formerly considered a distinct species P. rebeli; see e.g. Bereczki et al., 2018) twice as long as imagoes than those from wet meadows (Timuș et al., 2013). However, it is important to note that there are phenological differences in the flight period of both P. alcon ecotypes. ...
Article
Full-text available
The life expectancy of adult butterflies is highly diverse. Substantial variation may be found among closely related species, and even on the intraspecific level, where it could be associated with sex, genetic differentiation, diet and weather conditions. We compared the demographic parameters of populations of the regionally endangered Boloria eunomia butterfly living in two different habitats. Across its boreal‐mountane distribution range in Europe, B. eunomia occurs in two ecotypes associated with wet meadows and raised bogs using distinct both larval and nectar plants. We carried out simultaneous studies of both ecotypes through mark–recapture surveys of two large populations in NE Poland, located close to each other. A total number of 1124 and 644 individuals were marked at the bog and meadow sites respectively, and 51 and 33% of them were recaptured at least once. The estimated adult population size of the bog population (about 3000) was twice as large as that of the meadow population, which however was characterized by more than three‐fold higher density. The emergence of imagoes was highly synchronized, and protandry was evident. The sex ratio was slightly male‐biased and the mean capture probability was significantly higher for males. More importantly, the estimated life span of males was considerably shorter than that of females at each site. Finally, both sexes of the ‘meadow’ ecotype lived significantly longer than those from the raised bog. The detected pattern can be related to distinct larval food plants and/or nectar resources, different pressures from predators, genetic variation and morphological differences affecting thermal properties. Further investigations would be useful to reveal if the shorter adult life span translates into reduced viability of bog populations and consequently whether they are potentially more threatened, at least in the southern margins of the distribution range in Central Europe.
... More specifically, we want to understand whether the species' adaptation to high mountain habitats is sufficient to maintain a proterandrous population structure with all its advantages (Fagerstr€ om and Wiklund, 1982;Larsen et al., 2013;N eve and Singer, 2008) or whether a close synchronisation of emergence of both sexes is necessary for surviving the high mountain challenge, as for example in the case of Euphydryas aurinia glaciegenita (Junker et al., , 2015. We further analyse whether emergence is restricted to a short time window as in many lowland butterfly species Knight et al., 1999;Slamova et al., 2013;Szentirmai et al., 2014;Timuş et al., 2013;Weyer and Schmitt, 2013) or whether it is extended over a longer time period to spread the risk of encountering highly unpredictable weather conditions in high mountain ecosystems. Finally, we analyse whether possible differences in life history and biology between these two closely related species, one with an alpine disjunct and the other with an arctic-alpine distribution, may be due to their different biogeographical background and range dynamics, and hence the result of exposure to different selection pressures. ...
Article
High mountain ecosystems are extreme habitats, and adaptation strategies to this ecosystem are still poorly understood in most groups. To unravel such strategies, we performed a MRR study in the Hohe Tauern National Park (Salzburg, Austria) with two nymphalid butterfly species, Boloria pales and B. napaea. We analysed their population structure over one flight period by studying the development of population size and wing wear. B. pales had more individuals and a higher survival probability than B. napaea; the sensitivity to extreme weather conditions or other external influences was higher in B. napaea. We only observed proterandry in B. pales. Imagines of both species survived under snow for at least some days. Additionally, we observed a kind of risk-spreading, in that individuals of both species, and especially B. pales, have regularly emerged throughout the flight period. This emergence pattern divided the population's age structure into three phases: an initial phase with decreasing wing quality (emergence > mortality), followed by an equilibrium phase with mostly constant average wing condition (emergence = mortality) and a final ageing phase with strongly deteriorating wing condition (mortality » emergence). Consequently, neither species would likely become extinct because of particularly unsuitable weather conditions during a single flight period. The observed differences between the two species suggest a better regional adaptation of B. pales, which is restricted to high mountain systems of Europe. In contrast, the arctic-alpine B. napaea might be best adapted to conditions in the Arctic and not the more southern high mountain systems. However, this needs to be examined during future research in the Arctic.
... Furthermore, to distinguish the low and high altitude xeric ecotypes, we refer to the populations at high xeric elevations as the "alpine" ecotype. At the very few known syntopic localities (Răscruci, Romania and the Bükk Mountains, Hungary), the two low-elevation ecotypes also differ in their phenology, and their flight times only occasionally and partially overlap, limiting possibilities for gene flow 20,[22][23][24] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Biotic interactions are often acknowledged as catalysers of genetic divergence and eventual explanation of processes driving species richness. We address the question, whether extreme ecological specialization is always associated with lineage sorting, by analysing polymorphisms in morphologically similar ecotypes of the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea alcon. The ecotypes occur in either hygric or xeric habitats, use different larval host plants and ant species, but no significant distinctive molecular traits have been revealed so far. We apply genome-wide RAD-sequencing to specimens originating from both habitats across Europe in order to get a view of the potential evolutionary processes at work. Our results confirm that genetic variation is mainly structured geographically but not ecologically — specimens from close localities are more related to each other than populations of each ecotype from distant localities. However, we found two loci for which the association with xeric versus hygric habitats is supported by segregating alleles, suggesting convergent evolution of habitat preference. Thus, ecological divergence between the forms probably does not represent an early stage of speciation, but may result from independent recurring adaptations involving few genes. We discuss the implications of these results for conservation and suggest preserving biotic interactions and main genetic clusters.
... With these single distances, we calculated the inverse cumulative proportion of individuals moving in certain distance classes, with each class representing an interval of 20 m. We fitted these data against 2 different mathematical models, which are commonly applied to find the best prediction of long-distance movements (Baguette, 2003;Zimmermann et al., 2005;Fric & Konvička, 2007;Skórka et al., 2013;Timus et al., 2013;Weyer & Schmitt, 2013): the negative exponential function (NEF) and the inverse power function (IPF). To exclude artefacts based on the 20 m interval size, we performed further analysis with 30 and 50 m intervals. ...
Article
Sexual dimorphism is a widespread phenomenon in Lepidoptera. It is reflected in differences in life history, behaviour and morphology. Analyses of differences in behaviour are mostly difficult and time-consuming, especially in high mountain ecosystems. To enhance our knowledge on sexual dimorphisms of alpine butterflies, we performed a mark-release-recapture study on two species common in the Alps: Boloria pales and Boloria napaea. We analysed movement and foraging behaviour to investigate differences between sexes. Both sexes were mostly sedentary and the movement distances of males and females similar. However, obvious differences in dispersal behaviour between the sexes were found in the movement patterns. Three different patterns were distinguished. Most males showed intensive flight activity, but mostly flew only in a limited part of the entire habitat (i.e. their individual home range) searching for females, whereas females were less flight active and flew only to find places for oviposition or feeding. The third pattern, where individuals flew larger distances, was only observed in a small number of males, which always returned to their home range. Nearly all feeding was observed on Asteraceae. However, males preferred the genera Leontodon and Crepis, while females preferred Leontodon and Carduus. Apart from this sexual difference in foraging, individuals of both sexes were found to be more or less specialised on nectar sources. Flight activity was generally greater in males than females. Therefore, we think that sex-specific requirements in nectar ingredients exist, i.e. sugar for the intensive flight activity of males and amino-acids for egg production of females. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
... The status of these two forms has been the subject of considerable controversy, but studies suggest that the hygrophilous and xerophilous forms of M. alcon are not two distinct lineages ( Bereczki et al., 2005; Bereczki et al., 2006;). Populations of the two forms are usually spatially distinct, but at Răscruci in Romania both forms occurs syntopically ( Czekes et al., 2013; Timuş et al., 2013). of the adult butterflies. Level of suitability was predominantly driven by land cover types and only to a lesser extent moisture and insolation. ...
... The Large Blues butterflies have started being thoroughly studied after sites with Maculinea taxa from Dealurile Clujului Est area were dicovered by Prof. Dr. László Rákosy. The habitats in the Natura site Dealu ile Clujului Est a e p o a l u i ue in Europe, because in some northern exposed meso-higrophilous meadows five of the European Maculinea taxa cohabit syntopically: Maculinea arion Linnaeus 1758, M. alcon pneumonanthe Denis & Schiffermüller 1775, M. alcon cruciata (also on southern exposed sites), M. teleius Bergsträsser 1779 and M. nausithous kijevensis Sheljuzhko 1928 (Rákosy 2013, Ti uș et al. 2013a). This was the reason why in 2009 a series of biological and ecological studies, such as mark-release-recapture studies, Myrmica nests investigation, laboratory experiments etc., were initiated. ...
Article
Full-text available
Caterpillars of the Alcon blue butterfly Phengaris alcon are initially endophytic and feed inside the flowerheads of Gentiana plants, but complete their development as social parasites in the nests of Myrmica ants, where they are fed by workers. Its specific and complicated ecological requirements make P. alcon a very local, threatened species, sensitive to environmental changes. We investigated an isolated and previously unknown population in an area of high nature value—the Białowieża Forest (NE Poland). Using the mark–release–recapture method we estimated the seasonal number of adults at 1460 individuals, and their density (850/ha) was the highest among all populations using G. pneumonanthe studied so far. The site is also unique due to the presence of the specific parasitoid Ichneumon cf. eumerus, and parasitoids are considered the ultimate indicators of the biodiversity of Phengaris systems. Since 75.5% of P. alcon pupae were infested we could estimate the seasonal population of adult wasps at about 4500 individuals. The high abundance of both P. alcon and its parasitoid may be explained by favorable habitat characteristics, i.e., the strong presence of host plants and the high density of nests of Myrmica scabrinodis, which is the only local host ant of the butterfly.
Article
Full-text available
Romania is one of the few countries where all five European taxa of the butterfly genus Maculinea are known to occur. However, there are very few national studies focused on this group of butterflies, in contrast with the high amount of information available for Central and Western Europe. In this paper, we present the results of the first mark-release-recapture (MRR) study on populations of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous that occur sympatrically on a mesohygrophilous meadow near Cluj-Napoca, Romania. By applying the MRR method throughout the entire flight period of both species, we estimated both individual survival and population size. The population size of both species was typical for Maculinea (2,480 individuals for M. nausithous and 1,198 for M. teleius). The estimates of survival were high (on average 0.8 for both species), suggesting relatively long life spans by comparison to results of other studies on the two species. Together with occasional observations of several years, the results of this study suggest that the populations of the studied species are relatively well conserved. This is of particular importance for M. nausithous since this species is known from very few localities in Romania and the population studied by us is one of the largest in the country. However, recent changes in habitat management could represent a threat to the long term survival of these Maculinea species and immediate conservation measures have to be taken in order to ensure their persistance.
Article
Full-text available
The blues of the genus Maculinea belong to one of the most studied butterflies in Eurasia ( Pech & all 2004). Their vulnerability to any change in their habitat, their tremendous specialization together with the intensification of the antropic pressure led to population decline all over Europe and decrease of their distribution, therefore they are highly endangered at present ( Winho FF 2001). However, in Ro -mania, all the 4 (5) species of this genus are still present: Maculinea arion, M. teleius, M. nausithous, M. alcon/rebeli, but few things are known about their distribution, population density, hosts, antropic influences etc. This paper presents, for the first time, important information regarding the distribution of Maculinea species in Romania and also certain considerations about their status
Article
Full-text available
The initially phytophagous caterpillars of Maculinea alcon and M. rebeli complete their development in Myrmica ant colonies as social parasites. Recent genetic studies show no differences at the species level among various populations of each butterfly taxa. Usually M. alcon and M. rebeli are identified by habitat and larval food plants (Gentianaceae) and host ant specificity is also considered to be an important feature. However most of the ecological characteristics overlap at least in some parts of their distributions. The developmental and survival characteristics of caterpillars reared by different Myrmica species were compared in laboratory experiments and in the field. Morphologically indistinguishable M. alcon and M. rebeli, which originated from Polish populations, are very similar in terms of host specificity i.e. larvae survived both with M. scabrinodis and M. sabuleti. However they showed different growth characteristics. The earlier flight period of M. rebeli, which is synchronized with the phenology of Gentiana cruciata, resulted from the quick growth of caterpillars in Myrmica nests in the pre-winter phase, when they gained about half of their final body biomass. After the end of winter they recommenced growth almost immediately. M. alcon larvae entered diapause shortly after adoption by ants and began to increase in weight significantly just one month after the onset of spring, which synchronized their development with that of their larval food plant, G. pneumonanthe. Therefore neither population group is transferable between habitats and should still be regarded, at least, as distinct conservational units.
Data
Full-text available
Romania is one of the few countries where all five European taxa of the butterfly genus Maculinea are known to occur. However, there are very few national studies focused on this group of butterflies, in contrast with the high amount of information available for Central and Western Europe. In this paper, we present the results of the first mark-release-recapture (MRR) study on populations of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous that occur sympatrically on a mesohygrophilous meadow near Cluj-Napoca, Ro-mania. By applying the MRR method throughout the entire flight period of both species, we estimated both individual survival and population size. The population size of both species was typical for Maculinea (2,480 individuals for M. nausithous and 1,198 for M. teleius). The estimates of survival were high (on average 0.8 for both species), suggesting relatively long life spans by comparison to results of other studies on the two species. Together with occasional observations of several years, the results of this study suggest that the populations of the studied species are relatively well conserved. This is of particular importance for M. nausithous since this species is known from very few localities in Romania and the population studied by us is one of the largest in the country. However, recent changes in habitat management could represent a threat to the long term survival of these Maculinea species and immediate conservation measures have to be taken in order to ensure their persistance.
Article
Full-text available
Our research in recent years, revealed the presence of some unique habitats of European value in Transylvania, in which the traditional land use resulted in the preservation of specific plant and invertebrate communities. These include habitats harboring species of the Maculinea genus. Mark - release - recapture studies in the area of Cluj Hills (Cluj county) from of the last two years revealed the presence of a stable population of M. teleius with an aproximate number of individuals between 700-800 on an area of 20 ha. The (meta)populational structure of this species in the studied area can be considered close to optimal. The main danger for this population is represented by the abandonment of the traditional land use practices. Future management plans should include keeping an annual extensive grazing, or a traditional mowing practice between 25 august and 15 september.
Article
The level of variation and the pattern of differentiation were studied in two Western Hungarian (Transdanubia: Őrség region) and two Romanian (Transylvanian Basin) populations of Macu-linea nausithous (Dusky Large Blue). The aim was to provide evidence on the genetic differ-entiation of the Transylvanian populations, which were relegated as M. nausithous kijevensis by RÁKOSY et al. (2010). In order to analyse genetic variance enzyme polymorphism was studied at 17 loci. The structure of phenotypic variation was investigated by performing morphomet-ric analyses on 11 traits of the wings. Statistical procedures were chosen so, that the results ob-tained for morphological and genetic data could be compared. The results of all genetic surveys supported the differentiation of the Transylvanian popula-tions from the Western Transdanubian (Őrség) ones. Hence, genetic results supported the existence of differentiation at the subspecies level in M. nausithous. The results of the morphometric analyses, however, were not obvious. In some analyses (phenogram) no clear phenotypic differentiation was observed between the two regions. Nevertheless, the results of hierarchical analysis of variance and Multiple Discriminant Analysis indicated a significant separation of specimens from the two regions. In addition, differences were detected in the level of variation between the two regions. Both genetic and phenotypic variation was higher in the Transylvanian than in the Őrség samples.