Content uploaded by R. Mark Brigham
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by R. Mark Brigham on Feb 02, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
457
Daily Torpor
in a Free-ranging Goatsucker,
the
Common Poorwill
(Phalaenoptilus
nuttallii)
R. Mark
Brigham*
Division of Ecology (Behavioural
Ecology Group), Department
of Biological
Sciences, University
of Calgary, Calgary,
Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
Accepted 8/21/91
Abstract
Numerous laboratory
studies show that common
poorwills (Caprimulgidae:
Pha-
laenoptilus nuttallii) are capable of entering daily torpor
when deprived offood.
Using
temperature-sensitive
radio transmitters,
I measured the skin temperature
offree-ranging birds under natural conditions to test three hypotheses
about the
use of torpor by poorwills. I predicted that (1) poorwills would enter torpor only
in "energy emergencies"
(defined as birds
with low body mass), (2) only the non-
incubating or brooding
member
ofa pair would use torpor
during the breeding
season, and (3) poorwills
would be less likely to enter torpor
on moonlit nights
when longer periods of activity can be sustained.
My
results
show that adult
poor-
wills of both sexes enter torpor
regularly
in April, May,
and September,
but not dur-
ing the breeding
season. Ifound no evidence that torpor
was used only in energy
emergencies
or that the lunar cycle influenced the use of torpor.
Skin temperatures
regularly
dropped
below 100
C and in one instance
fell below
30 On one occa-
sion an individual bird remained torpid
for at least 36 h. Ifound limited evidence
suggesting
that the temperature
at twilight,
but not insect abundance, can be used
to
predict whether birds
will remain active or enter torpor.
Introduction
The high metabolic rate
of homeothermic animals
has favored the evolution
of a number of ways to minimize energy expenditure and cope with periods
of food shortage.
Torpor,
which allows the reduction of metabolic rate
and
consequently body temperature
(Tb), is one physiological means used by
some homeotherms
to "escape"
conditions
of extreme cold or food shortage.
In birds and mammals, torpor is characterized
by a periodic, facultative
lowering of Tb
resulting in a hypometabolic
state (Wang
1989). Depending
*
Present address:
Department
of
Biology, University
of
Regina,
Regina,
Saskatchewan
S4S
OA2, Canada.
Physiological
Zoology 65(2):457-472.
1992.
C 1992
by
The
University
of
Chicago.
All
rights
reserved.
0031-935X/92/6502-911$02.00
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
458 R.M.
Brigham
on the species, environmental
conditions, and ecological situation, Tb may
drop 40-350C below normal, and torpor may last from hours to weeks
(Wang 1989).
Torpor
in birds and mammals is polyphyletic (see Dawson and Hudson
[1970] and Wang [1989] for reviews) and represents an advanced form of
thermoregulation
rather than a reversion to primitive
poikilothermy.
How-
ever, because hypometabolism has been studied almost exclusively in
mammals (Heller 1989), the use of torpor by birds is interesting from a
comparative standpoint.
Dawson and Hudson (1970) and Reinertsen
(1983)
reviewed the occurrence
of facultative
torpor
in birds and listed eight orders
in which the phenomenon has been found. Torpor
in birds typically lasts
less than 24 h and has been characterized
as taking two forms. Nocturnal
hypothermia (see, e.g., Reinertsen and Hafthorn
1983) occurs when indi-
viduals show shallow depressions (5o-100C) in Tb
and return to normal
by
dawn,
whereas daily torpor typically
involves depression of Tb
by more than
100C. It is likely that these two physiological states represent a continuum
and cannot be clearly differentiated,
as my arbitrary
temperature ranges
suggest. Many
hummingbirds
(Trochilidae;
Krtiger,
Prinzinger,
and Schu-
mann 1982) and goatsuckers (Caprimulgidae;
Bartholomew, Howell, and
Cade 1957) enter daily torpor
under laboratory
conditions. One species that
might not fit this classification is the common poorwill (Caprimulgidae:
Phalaenoptilus nuttallii), the only bird thought to be capable of entering
long-term torpor
or hibernation (Jaeger 1948, 1949; Brauner
1952).
Studies of daily torpor
in hummingbirds
(Lasiewski 1963; Lasiewski and
Lasiewski
1967; Hainsworth,
Collins, and Wolf 1977;
Withers
1977; Krtiger
et al. 1982) and
goatsuckers
(Marshall
1955;
Bartholomew et al. 1957;
Howell
and Bartholomew
1959;
Bartholomew,
Hudson,
and Howell 1962;
Peiponen
1966;
Austin and Bradley
1969;
Dawson
and Fisher
1969;
Ligon
1970;
Withers
1977) are almost exclusively laboratory investigations.
This is probably
due
to the small
size of these birds and their
inaccessibility
under field conditions.
In one of the few field studies, Calder
and Booser (1973) used thermistors
implanted in synthetic eggs and found that incubating
female broad-tailed
hummingbirds (Selasphorusplatycercus)
entered torpor
on only two of 161
nights. On the two nights, the use of torpor
was correlated
with a reduced
opportunity
for feeding.
On the basis of laboratory
studies, many
authors claim that
torpor
in birds
occurs only when the animal is energetically stressed (Calder and King
1974; Hainsworth et al. 1977; Hainsworth and Wolf 1978; Hudson 1978).
In both hummingbirds
and goatsuckers, torpor
under laboratory
conditions
has been associated with a prior depletion of energy in the form of reduced
body mass (Marshall
1955;
Hainsworth et al. 1977;
although
see Jaeger 1948;
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
Torpor
in
Free-ranging
Poorwills
459
Ligon 1970). Recently
however, Carpenter
and Hixon (1988) found a wild,
healthy, energetically unstressed rufous hummingbird (Selasphorus
rufus)
in torpor.
This is counter to the prediction of the "energy emergency" hy-
pothesis. There are no field data on the use of torpor by goatsuckers
under
natural conditions that allow for an evaluation of this hypothesis.
Heterothermic bats (e.g., vespertilionids and rhinolophids) are ecologi-
cally
similar to goatsuckers
in that
they feed on flying
insects captured during
crepuscular or nocturnal activity periods. Both laboratory (reviewed in
McNab
[1982]) and field studies (Racey and Swift 1981; Audet and Fenton
1988) show that
insectivorous bats use torpor
in situations other than
energy
emergencies (defined by reduced body mass). However, pregnant
and lac-
tating bats, like nesting hummingbirds (Calder and Booser 1973), enter
torpor only under extreme conditions. For bats, the explanation for this is
that it delays parturition
and inhibits lactation
(Racey 1973;
Racey
and Swift
1981; McNab
1982;
Audet and Fenton 1988).
The purpose of this study was to determine, with temperature-sensitive
radio
transmitters,
when or if free-ranging
poorwills
enter
torpor.
If poorwills
enter torpor only in energy emergencies, then torpor should occur rarely
and only in birds with low body masses. If poorwills behave like insectivo-
rous bats (see, e.g., Audet and Fenton 1988), then I predict that they will
enter torpor regularly during periods of low nocturnal temperatures
and
low insect abundance but not, or only rarely, during the incubating or
brooding period, since this may result in hatching delay or the death of
embryos or chicks (Hafthorn 1988). If torpor occurs during the nesting
period, I predict that it will only be used by the nonincubating or non-
brooding member of the pair. Finally, since some goatsuckers, including
poorwills, forage more during moonlit periods of the night (Mills 1986;
Brigham
and Barclay,
in press), torpor,
if used, should occur less often on
"light"
nights when birds have more time available for foraging.
Material and Methods
Study Site
The study was conducted in September 1988 and from April
to September
in 1989 and 1990 in the Okanagan Valley of south-central
British Columbia
(49018'N,
119031'W),
near the northern
limit of the species' breeding range,
where they do not overwinter (Cannings, Cannings,
and Cannings 1987).
Therefore, my observations
represent characteristics
of torpor and not hi-
bernation. The southern
Okanagan Valley comprises a series of lakes linked
by the Okanagan
River.
On the side hills of the valley, where the activities
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
460 R.M.
Brigham
of Phalaenoptilus nuttallii are centered, the vegetation consists of open
conifer forest dominated by Pinus ponderosa (Cannings et al. 1987). In
1988 and 1989, I captured
individuals
on the eastern
side of the valley near
Vaseaux
Lake.
In 1990, I trapped
individuals
on the western side, 8 km NW
of the town of Oliver. The two study areas were separated
by less than 10
km. I captured poorwills in mist nets set in foraging areas (usually across
gravel roads) or by luring birds into nets using song playbacks. I distin-
guished males from females by the presence and length of white tips on
the rectrices (Chapman
1925). Females had buff-colored tail tips about half
the length of males' tail tips (J. T. Marshall,
personal communication). All
individuals
included in the analysis
were at least 1 yr old.
Telemetry
I used temperature-sensitive
radio transmitters
(model PD-2T,
Holohil Sys-
tems, Woodlawn, Ontario) to measure the temporal patterns
of activity by
poorwills and to ascertain
when they entered torpor.
Transmitters
(average
mass 2.4 g) were affixed
to the birds with an elastic harness slipped over
the wings (Brigham 1989). The effective range of signal reception varied
from 1 to 4 km depending on terrain. I classified individuals as either moving
or stationary
at 5-min
intervals
using a Merlin 12 telemetry
receiver (Custom
Electronics,
Urbana,
Ill.) and a five-element
Yagi
antenna.
During
each mea-
surement,
a minimum of 20 pulses were monitored and any change in either
the direction or strength
of the signal was defined as a movement.
Transmitters were affixed
so that the harness
kept the temperature
sensor
in contact
with the bird's skin on the back between the wings (interscapular
region). Thus, I measured skin temperature
(Tsk) in a manner analogous
to that
of Audet
and Fenton (1988). Transmitters
were calibrated to measure
temperature
from 0o to 400C (+0.5oC). I determined Tsk
by averaging
three
timings of the interval
required
for 10 transmitter
pulses and then using the
calibration curves prepared
for each transmitter
by the manufacturer.
This
was done every 20 min during nightly activity periods and opportunistically
during the daytime. Because of the transient fluctuations in avian Tb'S
(Reinertsen
and Hafthorn
1983) and the fact that
the Tb
Of
active poorwills
varies between 350 and 44oC under laboratory
conditions (Bartholomew
et
al. 1962), I followed Hudson (1978) and operationally
defined poorwills
as having
entered torpor
when Tsk
fell below 30 C. In this study,
birds
with
skin temperatures
below 300C
were never found or measured
to be active.
Thirteen adult
birds
(six females,
seven males) were captured
and outfitted
with transmitters.
I monitored individual birds carrying
transmitters for 165
bird-nights. On 108 of these nights, I monitored movements and the Tsk
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
Torpor
in
Free-ranging
Poorwills 461
of the individual all night (from approximately
sunset until activity
ceased
at dawn).
Environmental and Lunar Conditions
I measured the minimum
nightly temperature
(Tmin;
+0.50C), using a Taylor
maximum-minimum thermometer
mounted 1 m above the ground. In both
years the thermometer was placed within 1 km of the day roost or nest
locations of birds carrying
transmitters. There was a significant
correlation
in both 1989 and 1990 (r2 = 0.73 and P< 0.05 in both years) between Tmin
and the minimum temperature
measured at the Penticton airport,
located
15 km north of the study
area.
As
a relative indication of twilight temperatures
(Tow)
I used measurements from Penticton. At the same time that I measured
Tsk,
I used a Taylor laboratory
thermometer at the tracking
position to mea-
sure ambient temperature
(Ta)
to the nearest 20C.
Nightly lunar conditions were grouped into five categories based on the
percentage of the moon face illuminated (%MFI)
at midnight (0%, 1%-
25%,
26%-50%, 51%-75%, 76%-100%;
Mills 1986). Values of %MFI were
taken from tables published in the Astronomical Almanac (e.g., Anawalt
and Boksenberg 1987). The times of sunset, nautical
twilight, and sunrise
were calculated for the study site by the Dominion Astrophysical
Obser-
vatory,
Victoria,
British Columbia.
I used the end of nautical
twilight (when
the sun is 120 below the horizon) as the time delineating dusk or dawn
from
true night (Mills 1986). Cloud cover was not taken into account, since
it was rarely
cloudy in the study area and because Mills showed it did not
influence activity by whippoorwills (Caprimulgus vociferus).
In 1989, I assessed the influence of insect abundance on the use of torpor
by poorwills. Four sticky traps (coated with Tangletrap;
Southwood 1978;
Kunz 1988) were suspended approximately
1, 2, 3, and 5 m above a gravel
road where poorwills commonly foraged. On nights when birds were
tracked,
the traps
were hung at sunset and collected at sunrise. I recorded
the total number of insects captured, identified each insect to order, and
characterized them as large (>4 mm) or small (4 mm) in body length.
Results
On 16 occasions I measured Tsk
while simultaneously measuring cloacal
temperature
(Tc),
using a quick-registering
thermometer inserted 1 cm into
the cloaca. There was a highly significant
relationship between Tsk
and Tc
(Tc = 1.58 + 0.9598 Tsk; r2 = 0.99, P < 0.01; fig. 1). This illustrates the
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
462 R.M.
Brigham
Skin Temperature ('C)
45
40 OO
35
30
25
20
15
10 - O
5 O
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Cloacal Temperature
('C)
Fig. 1. Relationship between simultaneous measurement of Tsk
( C) and
T, (oC). The diagonal represents Tsk
= Tc.
reliability
of using Tsk
to assess Tb. Generally, Tc
was between 10 and 20C
higher than Tsk
(intercept = 1.58).
Individual
poorwills entered torpor
on 29 of the 165 bird-nights.
Ten of
the 13 birds that carried transmitters
(six males, four females) used torpor.
Twelve of the 13 birds carrying
transmitters
participated
in at least one
nesting attempt. One male apparently
did not acquire a mate and did not
nest. The incidence of torpor was not evenly distributed throughout the
summer
(table 1). No individual male or female used torpor
while incubating
eggs or brooding chicks or during periods not spent on the nest. The latest
date in the spring that an individual entered torpor
was June 3, 1990, and
the earliest date in the fall was September 1, 1989. The body mass of nine
males and six females captured
during April,
May,
and September,
the period
when torpor
was used, varied
between 36.9 and 54.5 g, with males weighing
44.7 and females 48.3 g, on average.
TABLE
1
Distribution of torpor
bouts during the summers of 1989 and 1990
April-May June July-August September
Bird-nights ... 55 44 58 7
Torpor ...... 24 2 0 3
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
Torpor
in
Free-ranging
Poorwills
463
Usually
(28 of 29 torpor
bouts), individuals were active
at dusk and entered
torpor at the end of nautical twilight (fig. 2). This suggests that the birds
use cues available during the dusk foraging period to determine whether
or not to enter torpor.
With
one exception, torpor
bouts lasted less than 12
h. On May
22-23, 1990, a male bird remained torpid for at least 36 h and
did not forage during the dusk period of May
23.
The use of torpor
on a given night varied among individuals. On five of
the nine nights when I monitored the Tb
of more than one bird simulta-
neously (two birds on eight nights and three birds on one night) one in-
dividual remained homeothermic while one entered torpor. On the night
when three birds were tracked,
two remained homeothermic and one en-
tered torpor.
The lowest Tsk
I recorded
was 2.80C
for a male bird at 0650 hours on May
13, 1989, when Tmin reached -1lC. From
the regression equation this cor-
responds to a predicted Tc
of 4.3 C. Not surprisingly,
I never recorded min-
imum predicted Tc
below Tmin (fig. 3); however, there was no significant
correlation between Tmin and predicted Tc (r2 = 0.38, n = 16, P> 0.10).
On nine occasions I measured
the cooling rates of poorwills entering
torpor.
The values ranged from a minimum of 4.20C per hour to a maximum of
13.20C
per hour.
Skin
temperature
('C)
40-
30
20
10
0
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500
- Active
birds -- Torpid
birds
Fig. 2. Mean Ts, (O C) for three male poorwills during the period from
April
30-May 20, 1989. Abscissa values show the time of the night. The
Tsk
was measured
for at least one bird all night on 15 dates during this
period, with a total sample of 20 bird-nights
(11 active and nine torpid).
Error
bars represent
+ 1 SE. The
arrow indicates the end of nautical twi-
light.
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
464 R.M.
Brigham
Predicted
cloacal
temperature
(C)
16 0 0
12 o
O
0O
O O
C
80
O
0
4- O
0
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Minimum
temperature
(0C)
Fig. 3. Minimum
Tc ("C) predicted by the equation
fromfig. 1,
plotted
against Tmin
(o C). The diagonal represents T, = Tm:n,.
In an attempt
to identify
the cues birds
might use in determining
whether
or not to enter torpor, I compared the distributions of Tmin,
Twi, total insect
abundance, and the abundance of large insects for nights when birds did
and did not enter torpor
using two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov
tests (figs.
4, 5). These distributions
represent 29 bird-nights
when torpor was used
and 40 nights when it was not for the same 10 individual birds (six males
and four females). For those nights when some individuals entered torpor
and some did not, I included data for the relevant individuals in both dis-
tributions. As
poorwills never became torpid
during
the nesting or brooding
period (between June 4 and August 31), this period was not included in
the analysis.
There were no significant
differences between the torpid and nontorpid
distributions with respect to the Tmin, total insect, or large insect variables
(Kolmogorov-Smirnov
D's of 0.20, 0.10, and 0.20, respectively;
P> 0.05 in
all cases). There was, however, a significant
difference in the distributions
of Tw measured at the Penticton airport
for nights when birds did and
nights when they did not enter torpor (D = 0.43; P < 0.01). The nonover-
lapping portion of the distributions
suggests that, when Trwi
at the airport
was below 80C,
poorwills entered torpor,
while, above 120C,
birds
generally
remained homeothermic.
Homeothermic
poorwills are more active on nights with moonlight than
on "dark"
nights (Brigham
and Barclay,
in press). Therefore, I compared
the distribution of %MFI
for just
the nights when birds entered torpor
with
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
Torpor Non torpor
30
25
5
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Temperature (oC)
Torpor M Non torpor
30 b
25
u)
20
0
o
c 15
o
L-
o
0
o 10
0.
5
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Temperature (OC)
Fig. 4. a, Distribution of Tmin
(0 C)for nights when birds did (n = 29)
and nights when they did not (n = 40) enter torpor.
Data for June 4-
August 31 are not included, since this was a period when birds did not
enter torpor.
b, Distribution of T,,, (oC) for nights when birds did (n =
29) and nights when they did not (n = 40) enter torpor.
A Kolmogorov-
Smirnov test shows that the distributions
are significantly diferent (see
text).
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
S Torpor Non torpor
60 -
50
- 40 -
30
c 30
0
0.
o 20
10
1 -5 6-10 11 -20 21+
Total number
of insects
Torpor Non torpor
70 b
60
0 1-5 6-10 11+
Number of large insects
Fig. 5. a, Distribution of the total number of insects sampled by sticky
traps on nights when birds did (n = 12) and nights when they did not (n
= 17) enter torpor. Data for June 4-August 31 are not included, since
this was a period when birds did not enter torpor.
b, Distribution of the
number of large insects sampled by sticky traps on nights when birds did
(n = 12) and nights when they did not (n = 17) enter torpor.
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
Torpor
in
Free-ranging
Poorwills 467
the distribution of %MFI on all nights that I tracked on (excluding the
period from
June 4 to August
31, when torpor
was never recorded). I found
no significant
relationship
between the lunar condition and the use of torpor
(%2
= 0.66, P> 0.10; table 2).
Discussion
Adult free-ranging poorwills of both sexes enter torpor regularly except
during the breeding season. Body temperature
of torpid birds regularly
dropped below 10oC,
and in one case a bird remained torpid for at least 36
h. I found limited evidence that Twi,
but not the abundance of insects, can
be used to predict whether poorwills will remain active or enter torpor
on
any given night.
On 97%
of the nights
when individuals
ultimately
entered torpor, foraging
activity
occurred at dusk. Foraging
occurred at dusk on every night when
birds did not enter torpor. Activity
levels at dusk were lower for individuals
that ultimately became torpid, but the birds appeared to compensate for
this lower activity by initiating foraging activity significantly
earlier (R. M.
Brigham,
unpublished data). This difference in behavior
may be a result of
poorer foraging conditions on those nights when torpor is subsequently
used. Activity
at dusk and the almost complete cessation of activity
at the
beginning of true night by birds using torpor suggests that environmental
conditions near the end of the dusk foraging
bout influence the likelihood
of entering torpor.
Temperature
and insect abundance are the two most obvious potential
cues birds might use to "decide" whether to enter torpor. However, my
measures of prey abundance, especially of large insects, which make up
the vast majority
of the diet (R. D. Csada,
unpublished data) and therefore
TABLE 2
The
relationship between %MFI and the use of torpor by poorwills
%MFI
0 1-25 26-50 51-75 76-100
Bird-nights ... 21 4 4 8 8
Torpor ...... 9 2 3 4 4
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
468 R.M.
Brigham
should be related to the rate of energy intake and Tmin, could not be used
to reliably
predict
the nights when birds entered torpor.
Although
there was
a significant difference between the distributions of Tw,
for nights when
poorwills did and nights when they did not enter torpor,
there was no ob-
vious threshold temperature
that
would allow the prediction of whether an
individual would enter torpor on any given night. This is not surprising,
given that moths, which are commonly consumed by poorwills (Bent 1940;
R. D. Csada,
unpublished data), emerge at different times of the year (see,
e.g., Yack
1988) and are influenced
by Ta
differently
(Heinrich
and Mommsen
1985). Similarly,
there is no precise threshold temperature
that can be used
to predict activity
or the entry into torpor by insectivorous
bats (Audet and
Fenton 1988). Variation
in the use of torpor between individuals is also
important,
illustrated
by the fact that, on the same night, some individuals
used torpor
whereas others did not. Unfortunately,
my small sample size of
nights when torpor
was used precludes rigorous analysis for the effects of
gender, time of year,
and foraging
success on the previous night on the use
of torpor by individual birds. However, it is worth noting that Audet and
Fenton (1988) found variation
between individual bats in the use of torpor
on the same night, which they ascribed to differences in reproductive
con-
dition.
Poorwills did not enter torpor in energy emergencies only, as some lab-
oratory
studies suggested they would (e.g., Marshall
1955). Except during
the nesting period, all tagged individuals (n = 10), with a range of body
masses, used torpor at one time or another. Thus, the data for poorwills
support the conclusions of Carpenter
and Hixon (1988), who rejected the
hypothesis that under natural conditions torpor is used by hummingbirds
only in energy emergencies.
To my knowledge, a Tsk
Of
2.80C, which corresponds to a Tc
of 4.30
C, is
the lowest naturally
recorded temperature
for any species of bird. Withers
(1977) found that captive poorwills could not spontaneously arouse them-
selves from
torpor
when Tb
was below 50C.
My
field data
suggest that,
under
natural
conditions, Tb
can fall below 50C and individuals can still sponta-
neously rewarm.
This inconsistency in results could be due to the difference
in body mass between individuals in Wither's
study (35 g) and the free-
living birds in my study (46 g on average). Heavier
birds
should have larger
energy reserves and may be able to generate the heat required to rewarm
from low temperatures.
Therefore, these birds should be at less risk when
lowering Tb
below 50C.
Another
possible explanation is that Wither's
birds
were captured in southern California
and thus could have been less cold
tolerant than birds from the Okanagan.
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
Torpor
in
Free-ranging
Poorwills 469
My
measurements of cooling rates for poorwills entering torpor
are similar
to those measurements made in the laboratory.
Cooling rates measured
under laboratory
conditions range from 1.80C to 17.1"C
per hour (Howell
and Bartholomew 1959; Lasiewski and Lasiewski
1967;
Austin and Bradley
1969; Ligon 1970) and are highly dependent on Ta.
This suggests that the
mechanism by which captive birds enter torpor is similar to the process
used under natural conditions.
I found no evidence to support the hypothesis that poorwills use torpor
less often on nights with moonlight than dark
nights. The use of torpor
was
not related to the relative illumination
provided by the moon, even though
this significantly
influences the foraging activity of these birds (Brauner
1952;
Brigham
and Barclay,
in press) and other
goatsuckers (Wynne-Edwards
1930; Mills 1986). It appears
that lunar condition has no effect on the use
of torpor by poorwills.
Although the southern Okanagan Valley of British Columbia is close to
the limit of the northern
range of the poorwill, the climate is moderate for
its latitude (Cannings
et al. 1987). Still, I expected that individual
birds not
attending eggs or chicks would enter torpor
to conserve energy on nights
with low Ta
and low insect abundance.
Tracking
data confirm that
both male
and female members of the pair participate
in incubation and brooding
(Aldrich 1935; Orr 1948). There was no obvious gender-related
pattern
in
the way nesting activity
was shared.
In some pairs,
the duties were unequally
divided (R. M. Brigham,
unpublished data). I predict that the probability
of finding
torpid birds during
the nesting period will increase in areas with
more continental climates than the Okanagan.
However, if this is not the
case, it suggests that the regular
occurrence of conditions requiring
the use
of torpor during
the nesting cycle may
be an ultimate constraint
determining
the northern
extent of the breeding range of this species.
In conclusion, this paper is the first
to provide field data about the use of
torpor by the poorwill, a bird whose physiological capabilities have long
attracted interest. The study demonstrates the critical
need for field data to
confirm or reject
the conclusions from
laboratory
studies of thermoregulation
(e.g., Carpenter
and Hixon 1988). In the case of poorwills, the large body
of laboratory
data does not completely account for the manner in which
poorwills use torpor
under natural
conditions. The apparently
unique attri-
butes of poorwills studied under laboratory
conditions prompted Heller
(1989) to suggest that conclusions regarding
the mechanisms of avian
torpor
should consider the poorwill as a special case. Whether
torpor
in these birds
really does represent a special case among birds or, for that matter,
verte-
brates should be addressed
by comparing
Phalaenoptilus
nuttallii with other
caprimulgids
and insectivorous bats. The depth and duration of bouts of
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
470 R. M.
Brigham
torpor by poorwills appears to be similar to those used by bats (Audet and
Fenton 1988), an ecologically similar group of animals. It remains to be
determined whether the apparent hibernation by poorwills also resembles
that of bats. Heller (1989) and Wang (1989) both conclude that there is
strong evidence for physiological homology between all forms of avian and
mammalian torpor. Only with further work in the field will it be determined
whether this conclusion holds true.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful
to R. L.
Mackey,
M. C. Firman,
T. S. Collard,
S. D. Grindal,
R.
Kershaw, A. L. MacKinlay, D. R. C. Prescott, D. W. Thomas, R. M. R. Barclay,
and H. N. Matthews for their help catching birds and timing beeps. The
study
was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council
(Canada)
operating grants
to R. M. R. Barclay,
a University
of Calgary
short-
term research grant, and an NSERC postdoctoral fellowship to myself. The
comments of R. D. Csada, A. C. Brigham, M. B. Fenton, M. B. C. Hickey, D.
Audet, P. A. Faure, R. M. R. Barclay, S. D. Wilson, and two anonymous re-
viewers greatly improved earlier versions of the manuscript.
Literature Cited
ALDRICH,
E. C. 1935. Nesting of the dusky poor-will. Condor 37:49-55.
ANAWALT,
R. A., and A. BOKSENBERG.
1987. The astronomical
almanac for the year
1989. Government
Printing
Office,
Washington,
D.C.
AUDET, D., and M. B. FENTON.
1988. Heterothermy and the use of torpor by the bat
Eptesicusfuscus (Chiroptera:
Vespertilionidae):
a field study. Physiol. Zool. 61:
197-204.
AusTIN, G. T., and W. G. BRADLEY.
1969. Additional responses of the poorwill to low
temperatures.
Auk 86:717-725.
BARTHOLOMEW, G. A., T. R. HOWELL, and T. J. CADE. 1957. Torpidity in the white-
throated
swift, Anna
hummingbird,
and poor-will. Condor
59:145-155.
BARTHOLOMEW, G. A., J. W. HUDSON, and T. R. HOWELL.
1962. Body temperature,
oxygen consumption,
evaporative
water
loss, and heart rate
in the poor-will.
Condor
64:117-125.
BENT,
A. C. 1940. Life histories of North American
cuckoos, goatsuckers,
humming-
birds, and their allies. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 176. 506 pp.
BRAUNER, J. 1952. Reactions of poor-wills to light and temperature.
Condor
54:152-
159.
BRIGHAM,
R. M. 1989. Roost
and nest sites of common nighthawks:
are gravel roofs
important?
Condor
91:722-724.
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
Torpor
in
Free-ranging
Poorwills
471
BRIGHAM, R. M. and R. M. R. BARCLAY. In press. Lunar
influence on the foraging
and
nesting activity
of the common
poorwill (Phalaenoptilus
nuttallii;
Caprimulgidae).
Auk.
CALDER,
W. A., and J. BOOSER. 1973. Hypothermia of broad-tailed hummingbirds
during incubation in nature with ecological correlations. Science 180:751-753.
CALDER,
W. A., and J. R. KING.
1974. Thermal and caloric relations in birds. Pages
259-413 in D. S. FARNER
andJ. R.
KING,
eds. Avian
biology. Vol. 4. Academic
Press,
New York.
CANNINGS,
R. A., R. J. CANNINGS,
and S. G. CANNINGS.
1987. Birds of the Okanagan
Valley, British
Columbia.
Royal
British
Columbia
Museum,
Victoria. 420 pp.
CARPENTER,
F. L.,
and M. A. HIXON.
1988. A new function for torpor:
fat conservation
in a wild migrant hummingbird.
Condor
90:373-378.
CHAPMAN,
F. M. 1925. Notes on the plumage of North American
birds. Bird-Lore
27:
393-394.
DAWSON,
W. R., and C. D. FISHER.
1969. Responses to temperature by the spotted
nightjar (Eurostopodus
guttatus). Condor
71:49-53.
DAWSON,
W. R., and J. W. HUDSON. 1970. Birds. Pages 223-310 in G. C. WHITTOW,
ed. Comparative
physiology
of thermoregulation.
Vol. 1.
Academic
Press,
London.
HAFTHORN, S. 1988. Incubating
female passerines do not let egg temperature
fall
below the "physiological
zero temperature" during
their absences from the nest.
Ornis Scand. 19:97-110.
HAINSWORTH, F. R., B. G. COLLINS, and L. L. WOLF. 1977. The function of torpor in
hummingbirds.
Physiol.
Zool. 50:215-222.
HAINSWORTH,
F. R., and L. L. WOLF. 1978. The economics of temperature regulation
and torpor. Pages 147-184 in L.
C. H. WANG and
J. W. HUDSON,
eds. Strategies
in
the cold: natural
torpidity
and thermogenesis.
Academic Press,
New York.
HEINRICH, B., and T. P. MOMMSEN.
1985. Flight of winter moths near O0C.
Science
228:177-179.
HELLER,
H. C. 1989. Sleep, hypometabolism,
and torpor
in birds. Pages 231-245 in
C. BECH
and R. E. REINERTSEN,
eds. Physiology
of cold adaptation
in birds. NATO
ASI Ser. A. Vol. 173. Plenum, New York.
HOWELL,
T. A., and G. A. BARTHOLOMEW.
1959. Further
experiments on torpidity
in
the poor-will. Condor
61:180-185.
HUDSON, J. W. 1978. Shallow,
daily torpor:
a thermoregulatory adaptation.
Pages
67-
108 in L.
C. H.
WANG
andJ.
W.
HUDSON,
eds. Strategies
in the cold: natural
torpidity
and thermogenesis. Academic Press,
New York.
JAEGER,
E. C. 1948. Does the poor-will "hibernate"? Condor
50:45-46.
- . 1949. Further observations
on the hibernation of the poor-will. Condor
51:
105-109.
KRIGER, K., P. PRINZINGER,
and K. L. SCHUMANN.
1982. Torpor
and metabolism in
hummingbirds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 73A:679-689.
KUNZ,
T. H. 1988. Methods
of assessing the availability
of prey to insectivorous bats.
Pages 191-210 in T. H. KUNZ,
ed. Ecological
and
behavioral
methods for
the study
of bats. Smithsonian Institution
Press,
Washington,
D.C.
LASIEWSKI,
R. C. 1963. Oxygen consumption of torpid, resting, active, and flying
hummingbirds.
Physiol.
Zool. 36:122-140.
LASIEWSKI,
R. C., and R.
J. LASIEWSKI. 1967. Physiological responses of the blue-throated
and Rivoli's
hummingbirds.
Auk 84:34-48.
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).
472 R.M.
Brigham
LIGON,
J. D. 1970. Still more responses of the poor-will to low temperatures. Condor
72:496-498.
MCNAB,
B. K. 1982. Evolutionary alternatives in the physiological ecology of bats.
Pages 151-200 in T. H. KUNZ,
ed. Ecology of bats. Plenum, New York.
MARSHALL,
J. T. 1955. Hibernation in captive goatsuckers. Condor 57:129-134.
MILLS,
A. M. 1986. The influence of moonlight on the behavior of goatsuckers
(Caprimulgidae).
Auk 103:370-378.
ORR,
R. T. 1948. Nesting behavior
of the poor-will.
Auk
65:46-54.
PEIPONEN,
V. A. 1966. The diurnal heterothermy
of the nightjar
(Caprimulgus eu-
ropaeus L.). Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A4, Biol. 101:1-35.
RACEY,
P. A. 1973. Environmental factors affecting the length of gestation in hetero-
thermic bats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 19(suppl.):175-189.
RACEY,
P. A., and S. M. SWIFT. 1981. Variations in gestation length in a colony of
pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus
pipistrellus) from year to year.
J. Reprod.
Fertil. 61:
123-129.
REINERTSEN,
R. E. 1983. Nocturnal hypothermia and its energetic significance for
small birds living in the arctic and subarctic regions: a review. Polar Res. 1:269-
284.
REINERTSEN,
R. E., and S. HAFTHORN.
1983. Nocturnal hypothermia and metabolism
in the willow tit Parus montanus at 630N.
J. Comp. Physiol. 151B:109-118.
SOUTHWOOD,
T. R. E. 1978. Ecological methods. Chapman & Hall, London. 524 pp.
WANG,
L. C. H. 1989. Ecological, physiological, and biochemical aspects of torpor
in mammals and birds. Pages 361-401 in L. C. H. WANG,
ed. Advances in com-
parative
and environmental
physiology. Vol. 4. Springer,
Berlin.
WITHERS,
P. C. 1977. Respiration,
metabolism,
and heat exchange of euthermic and
torpid
poorwills and hummingbirds.
Physiol.
Zool. 50:43-52.
WYNNE-EDWARDS,
V. C. 1930. On the waking-time of the nightjar (Caprimulgus e.
europaeus). J. Exp. Zool. 7:241-247.
YACK, J. E. 1988. Seasonal
partitioning
of atympanate
moths in relation
to bat
activity.
Can.
J. Zool. 66:753-755.
This content downloaded from 142.003.166.101 on February 02, 2016 14:14:23 PM
All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c).