Article

Intervention for Adolescents With Early Onset Psychosis and Their Families: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.26). 06/2014; 53(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.04.004

ABSTRACT

Objective
The present study aims to assess the efficacy of a structured psychoeducational group intervention for adolescents with early onset psychosis and their families. The intervention was implemented in parallel in 2 separate groups by focusing specifically on problem-solving strategies and structured psychosis-related information to manage daily life hassles associated with the disease in order to mitigate crises and prevent relapses.

Method
We performed a 9-month, randomized, rater-blind clinical trial involving 55 adolescent patients with early onset psychosis and 1 or both of their parents. A psychoeducational problem-solving group intervention (n = 27) was compared with a nonstructured group intervention (n = 28). The primary outcomes were number of hospitalizations, days of hospitalization, and visits to the emergency department. The secondary outcome measures were clinical variables and family environment.

Results
Assessments were performed before and after the intervention. At the end of the group intervention, 15% of patients in the psychoeducational group and 39% patients in the nonstructured group had visited the emergency department (χ² = 3.62, df = 1, P = .039). The improvement in negative symptoms was more pronounced in the psychoeducational group (12.84 [7.87]) than in the nonstructured group (15.81 [6.37]) (P = .039).

Conclusion
A parallel psychoeducational group intervention providing written instructions in a structured manner could help adolescents with early onset psychosis and their parents to manage crises by implementing problem-solving strategies within the family, thus reducing the number of visits to the emergency department. Negative symptoms improved in adolescents in the psychoeducational group.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Marta Rapado-Castro, May 28, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We aimed to design a multimodal intervention to improve adherence following first episode psychosis, consistent with current evidence. Existing literature identified medication attitudes, insight, and characteristics of support as important determinants of adherence to medication: we examined medication attitudes, self-esteem, and insight in an early psychosis cohort better to understand their relationships. Existing longitudinal data from 309 patients with early Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, nonaffective psychosis (83% first episode) were analyzed to test the hypothesis that medication attitudes, while meaningfully different from “insight,” correlated with insight and self-esteem, and change in each influenced the others. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Birchwood Insight Scale, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale insight were assessed at presentation, after 6 weeks and 3 and 18 months. Drug Attitudes Inventory (DAI) and treatment satisfaction were rated from 6 weeks onward. Structural equation models of their relationships were compared. Insight measures’ and DAI’s predictive validity were compared against relapse, readmission, and remission. Analysis found five latent constructs best fitted the data: medication attitudes, self-esteem, accepting need for treatment, self-rated insight, and objective insight. All were related and each affected the others as it changed, except self-esteem and medication attitudes. Low self-reported insight at presentation predicted readmission. Good 6-week insight (unlike drug attitudes) predicted remission. Literature review and data modeling indicated that a multimodal intervention using motivational interviewing, online psychoeducation, and SMS text medication reminders to enhance adherence without damaging self-concept was feasible and appropriate.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2015 · Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Very early (VEOS) and early-onset schizophrenia (EOS) represent more severe forms of the disorder, with clear differences from adult-onset schizophrenia (AOS). However, there is a distinct lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in this group of patients, and to date no systematic review has been conducted on the topic. The aim of this article is to review the current knowledge and evidence on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in VEOS/EOS. A total of eight articles were eligible for inclusion. Four studies evaluated psychoeducational and family interventions for patients with VEOS/EOS, whereas four studies focused on cognitive behavioral therapy or cognitive remediation. Overall, we found some preliminary evidence for the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in the treatment of VEOS/EOS. This evidence was strongest for cognitive remediation. Heretofore, VEOS/EOS have been treated primarily with psychosocial interventions based on evidence from interventions tailored for and tested on adults. Although more conclusive studies are still needed, thanks to recent clinical trials, we now have greater evidence to support the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in EOS/VEOS.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Current opinion in psychiatry
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To investigate whether the beneficial effects of a structured, psychoeducational, parallel-group program for adolescents with early-onset psychosis and their families observed immediately after the intervention were maintained 2 years later. Method: The present study examines the longitudinal efficacy of a randomized controlled trial based on a psychoeducational, problem-solving, structured group intervention for adolescents with early-onset psychosis and their families (PE) and compares it with that of a nonstructured group intervention (NS) after a 2-year follow-up. We analyzed whether the differences between PE and NS found after the intervention persisted 2 years later. Intergroup differences in number and duration of hospitalizations, symptoms, and functioning were also assessed. Results: After 2 years of follow-up, we were able to reassess 89% of patients. In the PE group, 13% of patients had visited the emergency department, compared with 50% in the NS group (p =.019). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups for negative symptoms or number and duration of hospitalizations. A significant improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) general symptoms was observed in the PE group. Conclusion: Our psychoeducational group intervention showed sustained effects by diminishing the number of visits to emergency departments 2 years after the intervention. Our findings indicate that this psychoeducational intervention could provide patients with long-lasting resources to manage crises more effectively.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015 · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Show more