Article

Family governance – Literature review and the development of a conceptual model

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

A growing number of articles emphasise the importance of establishing an effective system of family governance, and a synthesis of the existing literature on family governance mechanisms (henceforth FGM) seems timely and relevant. Therefore, by focusing on three FGM (family meetings, family councils and family constitutions), this systematic literature review sheds light on the factors associated with family governance. Altogether, eight family governance-related factors could be identified, which were then grouped into antecedents, correlates and outcomes and consequently consolidated into a conceptual model. The findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in family governance-related topics, ambiguity regarding the causality between FGM and related factors, a disregard of theoretical considerations and an underrepresentation of qualitative research strategies in contemporary family governance research. The article concludes with an extensive discussion of potential avenues for future research.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Az Építőipari Vállalatnál a professzionalizáció egyik kevésbé fejlett dimenziója a tulajdonos család professzionalizációja. A kutatók a transzgenerációs szándék elérése érdekében hatékony irányítási mechanizmusok mellett érveltek a családi vállalkozásokban, mint például a családi tanács, a családi alkotmány és az utódlási terv (Dekker et al., 2013;Suess, 2014;Polat, 2020). ...
... interjúalany, 2021) A vállalkozó család professzionalizációja Az Építőipari Vállalatnál a legkevésbé fejlett dimenzió a vállalkozó család professzionalizálódása. 2017 és 2021 között nem történt jelentős változás a családi alkotmány, a családi tanács és az utódlás tekintetében. (Ügyvezető, 2021) Az utódlásnak többféle formája is lehet (Suess, 2014). Lehet családon belül, egyenes ágon történő öröklés, vagy családon belül, de nem egyenes ágon, hanem egy unokatestvér által továbbvitt öröklés. ...
... Azaz a családiságból fakadó erőforrások és képességek csak akkor jelenhetnek meg, ha az üzlet és a család kapcsolata tisztázott, a cég (és a család) rendelkezik világos szervezeti jövőképpel a vállalat életéről az alapító után is. Eredményeink alapján a következő előfeltevéseket határozhatjuk meg: (1) A professzionalizálódás első lépése, hogy a család lefektesse azokat az alapvető értékeket, amik mentén működni kíván, ez vezethet majd később olyan professzionális mechanizmusokhoz, mint a családi tanács vagy a családi alkotmány (Suess, 2014;Kárpáti, 2021). ...
Article
Egyre több publikáció hangsúlyozza a családi vállalkozások professzionalizálásának fontosságát. Jelen tanulmányban arra a kérdésre keressük a választ, hogy milyen erőforrás- és képességváltozásokon megy vagy kell keresztül mennie egy közepes méretű családi vállalkozásnak a professzionalizálás folyamata során. A publikáció első részében bemutatjuk a professzionalizálódás megközelítéseit a különböző stratégiai paradigmák megközelítéséből és elhelyezzük az erőforrás-alapú nézet keretrendszerében. A cikk második felében az esettanulmány eredményei kerülnek bemutatásra. Az eredmények rámutatnak arra, hogy a professzionalizáció dimenzió összefüggenek és az egyik vagy másikban történő lemaradás bizonytalansághoz vezet a vállalaton belül. Fontos eredmény, hogy a professzionalizálódás során a családi vállalati tulajdonosoknak minden dimenzióra figyelniük kell.
... Az Építőipari Vállalatnál a professzionalizáció egyik kevésbé fejlett dimenziója a tulajdonos család professzionalizációja. A kutatók a transzgenerációs szándék elérése érdekében hatékony irányítási mechanizmusok mellett érveltek a családi vállalkozásokban, mint például a családi tanács, a családi alkotmány és az utódlási terv (Dekker et al., 2013;Suess, 2014;Polat, 2020). ...
... interjúalany, 2021) A vállalkozó család professzionalizációja Az Építőipari Vállalatnál a legkevésbé fejlett dimenzió a vállalkozó család professzionalizálódása. 2017 és 2021 között nem történt jelentős változás a családi alkotmány, a családi tanács és az utódlás tekintetében. (Ügyvezető, 2021) Az utódlásnak többféle formája is lehet (Suess, 2014). Lehet családon belül, egyenes ágon történő öröklés, vagy családon belül, de nem egyenes ágon, hanem egy unokatestvér által továbbvitt öröklés. ...
... Azaz a családiságból fakadó erőforrások és képességek csak akkor jelenhetnek meg, ha az üzlet és a család kapcsolata tisztázott, a cég (és a család) rendelkezik világos szervezeti jövőképpel a vállalat életéről az alapító után is. Eredményeink alapján a következő előfeltevéseket határozhatjuk meg: (1) A professzionalizálódás első lépése, hogy a család lefektesse azokat az alapvető értékeket, amik mentén működni kíván, ez vezethet majd később olyan professzionális mechanizmusokhoz, mint a családi tanács vagy a családi alkotmány (Suess, 2014;Kárpáti, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Egyre több publikáció hangsúlyozza a családi vállalkozások professzionalizálásának fontosságát. Jelen tanulmányban arra a kérdésre keresik a szerzők a választ, hogy milyen erőforrás- és képességváltozásokon megy vagy kell keresztül mennie egy közepes méretű családi vállalkozásnak a professzionalizálás folyamata során. A publikáció első részében bemutatják a professzionalizálódás megközelítéseit a különböző stratégiai paradigmák szemszögéből és elhelyezik az erőforrás-alapú nézet keretrendszerében. A cikk második felében az esettanulmányt mutatják be a két vizsgált időszakon keresztül. Az eredmények rámutatnak arra, hogy a professzionalizáció dimenziói összefüggenek, és az egyikben vagy másikban történő lemaradás bizonytalansághoz vezet a vállalaton belül. Fontos eredmény, hogy a professzionalizálódás során a családi vál-lalatok tulajdonosainak minden dimenzióra figyelniük kell. An emerging number of publications emphasize the importance of family business professionalization. The authors con-ducted a qualitative longitudinal case study with a resource-based perspective, concentrating on changes in the resources and capabilities a family firm undergoes while professionalizing the business. In the first part of the paper, they present approaches to professionalization from the perspective of different strategic paradigms. The second part outlines the findings of the potential relations between the dimensions of family business professionalization. The results reveal that the dimensions are interrelated, and a lack of progress in one or more dimensions can lead to uncertainty. The extensive discussion section emphasizes that family businesses should pay attention to all aspects of the firm’s professionalization.
... Pindado and Requejo (2015) covered more than 350 articles published in 37 top finance and management journals to analyze FFG system from performance, ownership structures and governance devices. Suess (2014) proposed a conceptual model by identifying 8 factors related to family governance from 19 articles published in 9 different journals. ...
... FFG, also can be regarded as family business governance, is a system of processes, practices and structures that are put in place at the highest level of the business, family and ownership (Suess, 2014). It consists of formal and informal mechanisms that can emanate from inside or outside of the company to control firm behavior in a way that balances and aligns the interests of its stakeholders . ...
... Subsequently, many researchers studied the classification of FFG. Some of them classified FFG from business, family and ownership aspects (Suess, 2014), while others categorized it by formal/informal governance mechanisms or inside/outside governance mechanisms Mazzelli et al., 2018). This paper summarizes the common classifications of FFG from previous literature, shown in Figure 1. ...
Article
Governance in family firms can profoundly influence corporate behavior and performance. Recently, family firm governance (FFG) has attracted extensive attention as increasing empirical research has been published. However, few studies have attempted to map the global research on this growing field. In this paper, a comprehensive literature review and bibliometric analysis are conducted to provide an overview of the FFG. A total of 626 relevant studies from the Web of Sciences Core Collection database between 1998 and 2020 are analyzed. First, based on a literature review by identifying the classification of FFG and topics related to family governance, an overall conceptual structure is proposed. Second, the performance and influence of journals, authors and papers are analyzed by descriptive bibliometric analysis. Finally, with assistance from the CiteSpace and VoS viewer tools, the co-authorship, co-occurrence and co-citation network are presented to display the social and intellectual structure and find the hotspots. The findings of this study help to objectively understand the evolution of FFG and to capture potential research directions.
... These mechanisms are trust-based institutions and documents that help families discuss and determine their influence over their businesses (Bloemen-Bekx et al., 2021). Family governance has a different function than business governance, as its mechanisms aim to strengthen family cohesion, channel a family's influence on a business, and develop shared expectations and plans for the future of the business (Gersick & Feliu, 2014;Suess, 2014). FGMs are not legally binding but can become morally binding over time and guide behavior more effectively than legally binding mechanisms (Bloemen-Bekx et al., 2021). ...
... The literature distinguishes between informal FGMs, such as informal family meetings, and formal FGMs, such as family councils and constitutions (Umans et al., 2020). The complexity of the family, business, and ownership dimensions should be considered when choosing the type of FGM (Suess, 2014). Informal, occasional family meetings are appropriate in first-generation family businesses (Suess, 2014), and the use of "informal family governance mechanisms of visible symbols and daily interactions with their schoolgoing offspring to embed the pride for their legacy" (Bloemen-Bekx et al., 2021, p. 12) is suggested to maintain generational control. ...
... The complexity of the family, business, and ownership dimensions should be considered when choosing the type of FGM (Suess, 2014). Informal, occasional family meetings are appropriate in first-generation family businesses (Suess, 2014), and the use of "informal family governance mechanisms of visible symbols and daily interactions with their schoolgoing offspring to embed the pride for their legacy" (Bloemen-Bekx et al., 2021, p. 12) is suggested to maintain generational control. Family council and constitution can benefit the second and later generations of family businesses as the business has grown and more family members are involved ( Researchers tend to agree that FGMs facilitate the succession process for several reasons. ...
Article
Full-text available
Succession is a very complex process and a critical phase in the life cycle of a family business. Finding a successor in ownership and management is one of the most demanding succession challenges, especially since younger generations have little interest or intention in joining their parents’ businesses. The action research was conducted to expand our understanding of owners’ attitudes and behaviors toward succession and the factors influencing successors’ intention and decision to enter the family business. The research also addresses the applicability of informal and formal family governance mechanisms in family business succession in post-transition countries. The research findings show the importance of the family dimension and emotional aspects of succession in post-transition countries. The theoretical hypotheses developed to form the basis for future confirmatory research and have implications for the key stakeholders and support infrastructure institutions involved in family business succession in post-transition countries.
... First, a family charter is a mechanism to establish an effective family governance system (Suess, 2014). The family charter (also called family constitution or family protocol) can be defined as a formal agreement in which fundamental principles and guidelines on how the family organizes its relationship with the business are formulated (Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012;Suess, 2014) and finds its theoretical roots in the relational governance perspective (Mustakallio et al., 2002;Poppo & Zenger, 2002;Uhlaner et al., 2007). ...
... First, a family charter is a mechanism to establish an effective family governance system (Suess, 2014). The family charter (also called family constitution or family protocol) can be defined as a formal agreement in which fundamental principles and guidelines on how the family organizes its relationship with the business are formulated (Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012;Suess, 2014) and finds its theoretical roots in the relational governance perspective (Mustakallio et al., 2002;Poppo & Zenger, 2002;Uhlaner et al., 2007). This perspective proposes that "governance emerges from the values and agreed-upon processes found in social relationships" (Poppo & Zenger, 2002, p. 709). ...
... The relational process and the final document will ultimately lead to strong family owner commitment and responsible ownership (Uhlaner et al., 2007). Thus, developing a family charter helps to formally describe the social capital in the family firm, which results in a more structured organization for family and business, fewer conflicts, and a better view of the long run of the business (Suess, 2014). Leana and Van Buren (1999) indicated that good managed social capital leads to increased access to (external financial) resources, improved group communication, and efficient collective actions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Family firms are one of the most ubiquitous forms of business organizations worldwide. Their survival and growth are thus not only crucial for the firms themselves but also for the overall economy. One of the factors that influence their survival and development are their financing decisions. These decisions are generally described through the pecking order theory. However, not much is known about the applicability of this theory in private family firms. Given the shortcomings (both theoretically and empirically) of the current literature, we analyze 1087 incremental financing decisions from 277 family firms to develop and test a specific family firm pecking order. We integrate the elements of the socioemotional wealth perspective to theoretically explain the preferred order and introduce family capital into the pecking order model. Our findings indicate that family firms first prefer internal financing, next debt financing, followed by family capital, and last external capital. We also find that SEW considerations play a role in this financing decision. Especially the retention of control over the firm and the aim to pass the firm to the next generation appear to play an important role in determining this order. These dimensions ensure that family firms try to avoid extra capital. However, when it is needed, they will opt for family capital over external capital. This paper thus provides more insight into the reasoning behind financing decisions in private family firms. Plain English Summary How do family firms finance their investments? When looking for ways to finance their investments, firms have several options. According to traditional finance theories, they generally follow a so-called pecking order: they prefer to first use their internal funds, before turning to external financing. For family firms, the most ubiquitous form of business organization worldwide, two important aspects have been ignored in this research until now. First, socioemotional aspects influence decision-making in family firms and thus probably also financing decisions. Next, the business family itself can act as an external source of finance, which is not yet accounted for in the current pecking order model. In this research, we take these issues into account in order to develop—theoretically and empirically—a family firm pecking order. We investigate over a thousand financing decisions of 277 privately held family firms. Our results show that they prefer internal financing, followed by bank debt, family capital, and external capital. Especially the retention of control over the firm and the aim to pass the firm to the next generation appear to play an important role in determining this order. Our research thus indicates that future research should pay attention to the peculiarities of family firms when investigating their financing decision.
... Especially in complex (strategic) decision-making processes, heuristics as "rule-of thumb" decision-making tools reduce complexity via selective information-processing and enable the promptness of decision-making (Shepherd et al., 2015). In this context, family governance measures can play an important role, as they provide an opportunity to determine the business-related decision competences assigned to the business family and at the same time define membership rules (Suess, 2014). Depending on the availability of decision heuristics, rules and routines concerning the handling of business family issues are deliberately planned and developed or emerge randomly. ...
... It is common practice in scale development studies to include constructs with a high degree of conceptual correspondence to be able to assess nomological validity, respectively content and predictive validity (Carpenter, 2018;Hair et al., 2010;Shmueli et al., 2019). The family governance (FGov) concept, as the first related concept used, corresponds to the concept of enterpriseness to a high degree, because it focuses on decisions at the interface of family and business (Suess, 2014). To integrate family and business expectations, which is key to the enterpriseness construct, we secondly used the well-established concept of family success (Basco & Pérez Rodríguez, 2009;Sorenson, 1999Sorenson, , 2000. ...
... Family Governance: The decision behavior of the business family is closely connected to its family governance. Family governance is defined as the way the business family defines and organizes its relationship with the family business and the relationships among family members (Suess, 2014). Family governance aims at strengthening the cohesion of the business family, avoiding and resolving conflicts (Memili et al., 2015), developing a coherent set of goals (e.g., education and training of family members) and allocating roles to family members. ...
Article
This article addresses the business family, which so far has received only limited scholarly attention. The business family as the group of family members regularly discussing and deciding business matters is key for the functioning of both the business and the family. Specifically, we propose and empirically test the concept of the enterpriseness of business families, which is the ability to handle the potentially contradictory expectations of the family and business systems. We empirically validate the enterpriseness scale using a sample of 451 business families. Results indicate high levels of validity and reliability. The two subscales decision-making ability (six items) and business family identity (four items) offer a methodically rigorous, theoretically sound, and parsimonious measure. The article presents opportunities for potential applications of the enterpriseness concept and scale for family business as well as business family research and practice.
... They enable ongoing communication in the family (Suess-Reyes, 2017;Sundaramurthy, 2008), perceptions of process fairness (Sundaramurthy, 2008;Van der Heyden et al., 2005), and relationship building (Mustakallio et al., 2002). In the family business literature, the practices most often referred to are the family constitution (normative outline of family guidelines), family meeting (recurrent gatherings, formal or informal, of family members) and family council (forum of family member representatives; Suess, 2014). Theory suggests that family governance is about procedures and rules that specify different levels of authority (Ranson et al., 1980). ...
... A third theoretical contribution of our study is that it advances understanding of how family governance affects social capital. Family governance is a concept that includes the facilitation of social interaction, communication, involvement and conflict mitigation (Suess, 2014) and an increase in social interactions between family members, leading to higher levels of shared vision (Mustakallio et al., 2002). Our study confirms that family governance is better understood as a communication system (Suess-Reyes, 2017;Sundaramurthy, 2008) rather than a decision making and organizing device (Brenes et al., 2011). ...
... Family governance mechanisms are related to improved decision making and commitment in enterprise families (Mustakallio et al., 2002), and they influence decision premises as well (Suess-Reyes, 2017). Similarly, older families tend to have a more participatory structure, while younger families are more centralized (Suess, 2014). Yet we know little about the inception of family-level decision-making modalities and their adaptation over time (Parada et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Over generations, decaying family social capital is a primary cause of enterprise wealth loss in enterprise families that share ownership of multiple entities and multiple assets. We answer recent calls to uncover the origins of family social capital by studying seven old, wealthy, and large transgenerational enterprise families. We complement existing research on wealth creation through entrepreneurship by offering a deeper understanding of how family social capital is enhanced in transgenerational enterprise families. Our inductive qualitative study finds that enterprise family social capital appears to be enhanced by family governance, family learning, family identity, and physical grounding.
... The governance mechanisms in family firms vary in types and significance as compared with corporate governance structures adopted by nonfamily-held firms. Such difference lies in the family firm's formal internal governance due to ownership concentration and control by small number of family owners and/or owner-managers (Chrisman, Chua, Breton-Miller, Miller, & Steier, 2018), and also the heterogeneity among these firms regarding the adoption of various family governance structures (Arteaga & Escribá-Esteve, 2020;Gersick & Feliu, 2013;Suess, 2014). ...
... One common and simple form of family governance structures is the family meeting (Fahed-Sreih, 2009;Neubauer & Lank, 1998). Family meeting is a wide-ranging tool that can be seen in various models (Koładkiewicz, 2014) used by families to discuss business matters, develop joint solutions, enhance the relation between the family and the firm, as well as initiating important debate on matters affiliating with the separation of ownership from management, succession plans, shares issues and the roles of the family council which can substantially vary from those of family meeting (Habbershon & Astrachan, 1997;Saleem, Khalid, & Nadeem, 2019;Suess, 2014). Family meetings may continue until the transition is made to a sibling partnership where pressure and demands for family assemblies or family forums increase. ...
... As the family assembly reaches a critical number of members, family council can be developed to form a more established family governance structure (Neubauer & Lank, 1998) which is considered to be the most frequent family governance mechanism in the literature (Suess, 2014). Family council may include multiple branches and/or generations who periodically come together to discuss issues arising from their family's involvement with a business (Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012;Gersick & Feliu, 2013;Koeberle-Schmid, Kenyon-Rouvinez, & Poza, 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to investigate the impact of family business governance (FBG) on organizational innovation (OIN) in family firms operating in Yemen. The study collected data from 219 family firms, and employed PLS-SEM to test the hypotheses and validate the study model. The results provide evidence of the influence of FBG on OIN in family firms, and that the application of FBG practices promotes better results at the organizational level seen as product innovation and process innovation. The results show that there are significant differences in organizational innovation that can be attributed to the size of the firm, while no differences are found to be attributed to the generation in charge. These findings provide a better understanding of the innovativeness in family firms with respect to the different roles of formal and informal governance structures, and may help business families to develop more effective governance structures out of which more active stewards with more innovative ideas can help trigger better organizational innovation. This paper attempts to update the current knowledge concerning inconsistency of findings in prior studies, and so contributes in updating research opportunities with respect to heterogeneity in family firms.
... The first one is widely discussed in the literature, so there is sufficient evidence on its effectiveness and implications. However, the family governance perspective presents numerous opportunities for study in academia, and has been a very important topic in recent decades [23]. In relation to family governance, family harmony has a direct impact on the planning adopted in terms of succession [24]. ...
... In this way, the family council represents for the family what the board of directors is for the company [25], and therefore constitutes a body focused on obtaining an efficient balance between ownership, management and family harmony. Family governance bodies are tools for the institutionalization of family relations [23,26] and act as conflict EBEEC prevention mechanisms in the family arena and strengthen family harmony. These mechanisms encourage the family's emotional ties to represent a strategic asset, and no longer a competitive disadvantage. ...
... These mechanisms encourage the family's emotional ties to represent a strategic asset, and no longer a competitive disadvantage. According to literature reviews in the field of family governance mechanisms, the family council is the most prevalent in recent years (1994-2012) [23]. ...
Article
The family council is a formal mechanism of the family governance in family businesses that aims to give a voice to all members of the family, and to unify the interests of all members. These interests are identified with the purpose of the family, necessary to achieve a long-term legacy, and the sustainability of the company. However, the establishment of the family council is a topic that is still at an incipient stage, both in the literature and for practitioners, so our contribution advances the understanding of family governance within the sphere of family businesses culture and context. For that purpose, we rely on two cultural indexes widely accepted in the literature. We have taken Hofstede’s dimensions and CAGE Distance Framework to explain the establishment of a family council in family businesses settled on the Eastern European countries. The prevailing culture in these countries defines the values and behaviors of their social organizations, namely, the family. The joint study of Hofstede’s dimensions and of the cultural, administrative, and economic differences in the Eastern European countries (CAGE framework) sheds light on how, when and why to establish a family council. This research opens a new field in the intersectional study of culture as an element of sociology and family business in the field of family governance. In advancing this line of research, multilevel analysis through case studies would confirm the coincidence of national values, with individual characteristics. Keywords: Family business, family council, organizational culture, eastern countries
... A second contribution is that we shift attention from the business to the family to understand the preservation of family social capital over multiple generations. While previous research has focused on family social capital as manifested in the business (Carr et al., 2011;Pearson et al., 2008), our study proposes that it is important to consider the governance system of the family behind the business to understand family social capital in enterprise families (Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012;Gersick & Feliu, 2014;Suess, 2014;Suess-Reyes, 2017). Our focus on the family unit of analysis and specifically transgenerational enterprise families complements emerging literature on family firm heterogeneity in relation to social capital (Sanchez-Ruiz et al., 2019) by looking beyond the assumption of naturally existing strong bonds in small families as well as previous social capital literature that had tended to focus on early generation families (Distelberg & Blow, 2011;Klein, 2008). ...
... After a multigenerational enterprise family reaches a certain level of complexity, more formal mechanisms are required to organize family interactions as well as the family's relationship with the enterprise (Mustakallio et al., 2002). The most common family governance practices are family meetings, the family council, and the family constitution (e.g., Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012;Mustakallio et al., 2002;Suess, 2014;Suess-Reyes, 2017;Uhlaner, 2006). Family meetings are recurrent formal or informal gatherings of family members where important matters relating to the enterprise are discussed (Habbershon & Astrachan, 1997). ...
... Family governance practices can enhance family identity because they enable ongoing communication (Suess-Reyes, 2017;Sundaramurthy, 2008), relationship building (Mustakallio et al., 2002), the development and articulation of family values and vision (Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012;Botero et al., 2015;, and information exchange and procedural transparency (Sundaramurthy, 2008;Van der Heyden et al., 2005). In terms of outcomes, family governance has been linked to family unity (Brenes et al., 2011;Jaffe & Lane, 2004;Koeberle-Schmid et al., 2014;Martin, 2001), transgenerational orientation (Suess-Reyes, 2017), positive family dynamics (Suess, 2014), and the development of interpersonal trust through interaction between family members (Arregle et al., 2007;Sundaramurthy, 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
Despite significant discussion surrounding the benefits of family social capital in family business research, precisely how it is built and maintained by enterprise families remains unclear. To explore how and when family governance practices can avoid the decay of enterprise family social capital, we examine the mediating role of family identity and the significance of both generational and business ownership. Testing of our moderated mediation framework using data from 175 enterprise families globally suggests that family governance can stimulate family social capital by strengthening family identity. We also find a negative moderating role for business ownership in this indirect relationship.
... The governance mechanisms in family firms vary in types and significance as compared with corporate governance structures adopted by nonfamily-held firms. Such difference lies in the family firm's formal internal governance due to ownership concentration and control by small number of family owners and/or owner-managers (Chrisman, Chua, Breton-Miller, Miller, & Steier, 2018), and also the heterogeneity among these firms regarding the adoption of various family governance structures (Arteaga & Escribá-Esteve, 2020;Gersick & Feliu, 2013;Suess, 2014). ...
... One common and simple form of family governance structures is the family meeting (Fahed-Sreih, 2009;Neubauer & Lank, 1998). Family meeting is a wide-ranging tool that can be seen in various models (Koładkiewicz, 2014) used by families to discuss business matters, develop joint solutions, enhance the relation between the family and the firm, as well as initiating important debate on matters affiliating with the separation of ownership from management, succession plans, shares issues and the roles of the family council which can substantially vary from those of family meeting (Habbershon & Astrachan, 1997;Saleem, Khalid, & Nadeem, 2019;Suess, 2014). Family meetings may continue until the transition is made to a sibling partnership where pressure and demands for family assemblies or family forums increase. ...
... As the family assembly reaches a critical number of members, family council can be developed to form a more established family governance structure (Neubauer & Lank, 1998) which is considered to be the most frequent family governance mechanism in the literature (Suess, 2014). Family council may include multiple branches and/or generations who periodically come together to discuss issues arising from their family's involvement with a business (Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012;Gersick & Feliu, 2013;Koeberle-Schmid, Kenyon-Rouvinez, & Poza, 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to investigate the impact of family business governance (FBG) on organizational innovation (OIN) in family firms operating in Yemen. The study collected data from 219 family firms, and employed PLS-SEM to test the hypotheses and validate the study model. The results provide evidence of the influence of FBG on OIN in family firms, and that the application of FBG practices promotes better results at the organizational level seen as product innovation and process innovation. The results show that there are significant differences in organizational innovation that can be attributed to the size of the firm, while no differences are found to be attributed to the generation in charge. These findings provide a better understanding of the innovativeness in family firms with respect to the different roles of formal and informal governance structures, and may help business families to develop more effective governance structures out of which more active stewards with more innovative ideas can help trigger better organizational innovation. This paper attempts to update the current knowledge concerning inconsistency of findings in prior studies, and so contributes in updating research opportunities with respect to heterogeneity in family firms.
... Among the most common and influential corporate governance bodies within family firms are the general shareholders' meeting, the top management team and the board of directors (Nordqvist et al., 2014;Suess-Reyes, 2014). The general shareholders' meeting is a governance body that deals with legal issues, such as the designation of the CEO and directors, and is usually held once a year (Nordqvist et al., 2014). ...
... The top management team is a key body composed of the CEO and other executives and is primarily responsible for adopting the firm's general decisions, establishing the goals to be achieved and designing the means to achieve them (Ruiz-Jiménez & Fuentes-Fuentes, 2016). Finally, the board of directors is a governance body whose main functions are exercising control, reviewing and evaluating the ideas of the top management team, assessing the CEO's performance or safeguarding the interests of the shareholders (Suess-Reyes, 2014). ...
... Finally, with respect to general shareholders' meetings, the body par excellence for the representation of ownership, the presence of women is similar to that of management bodies. Special mention requires the fact that the highest proportion of women is found in familyrelated bodies, i.e. in family governance mechanisms (Miller et al., 2013;Suess-Reyes, 2014), such as the family council and family assembly. In general terms, the Spanish data are in line with the worldwide trend (Corporate Women Directors International, 2019). ...
Chapter
Despite the increase in the number of studies analysing innovation in family firms over the last decade, there are still a number of critical issues that are far from being resolved. One of these issues is related to the influence of women’s presence in corporate governance structures on firms’ innovation outcomes. In light of this, the aim of the present chapter is to investigate whether the inclusion of women in private family firms’ corporate governance structures, namely, in the general shareholders’ meeting, the top management team and board of directors, influences firms’ innovation. By applying regression analyses to a sample of 339 Spanish private family firms, the findings reveal that the presence of women in general shareholders’ meetings and in top management teams has a negative and significant effect on innovation.
... Since a significant proportion of VC companies are family-owned, their governance is affected by the generational changes in the owner family . However, more research on how the transgenerational aspect influence governance is needed (Suess, 2014;Suess-Reyes, 2017; which also concerns how different investor types handle the deal processes (Schickinger et al., 2018). We define venture capital family businesses (VCFBs) as companies whose governance of portfolio companies is influenced by the family ownership logic (Brundin et al., 2014) and which aim to create value for current and future family generations through temporary equity stakes in other firms (Wright and Robbie, 1998). ...
... VCFBs usually have a portfolio of firms in which they are interested and invested in. Accordingly, a VCFB's governance of portfolio companies is affected by the level of involvement and the roles, which in turn, relate to the family business's age and size and to the number of family successions within the company (Jaffe and Lane, 2004;Ljungkvist and Boers, 2017;Suess, 2014;Suess-Reyes, 2017). Accordingly, "[A]s a family [firm] enters the third generation, it has become a complex structure with several family branches, diverse interests and stakeholders, and challenges to sustain collaboration and effectiveness" (Jaffe and Lane, 2004, p. 81), highlighting the necessity of developing a governance infrastructure for the family firm (Sharma and Nordqvist, 2008). ...
... Accordingly, "[A]s a family [firm] enters the third generation, it has become a complex structure with several family branches, diverse interests and stakeholders, and challenges to sustain collaboration and effectiveness" (Jaffe and Lane, 2004, p. 81), highlighting the necessity of developing a governance infrastructure for the family firm (Sharma and Nordqvist, 2008). Thus, the family-owned company's portfolio governance will likely change after the second or third family succession (Jaffe and Lane, 2004;Suess, 2014). For example, family succession affects governance issues such as practices, guidelines, board composition, professionalism and strategic planning (Blumentritt, 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The purpose of this study is to understand venture capital family businesses (VCFBs) governance of portfolio companies through the deal process. Design/methodology/approach This study applies a theory-developing approach. A model of VCFB governance is developed whose key aspects are illuminated by four examples (cases) of VCFBs. Findings Recent research suggests that a venture capital firm's corporate deal processes can be divided into the pre-deal, deal and post-deal phases. Based on the age, size and succession dimensions, propositions for how a governance trajectory develops for VCFBs, affecting the deal process of target family firms (TFFs), are presented. These propositions highlight how the family owners' actions and behavior are related to VCFB governance, which in turn, influences the three phases involved in making an investment. Originality/value The propositions suggest how personal and administrative VCFBs' governance of the deal process of portfolio companies is significantly affected by centrifugal and centripetal forces that drive the respective types of governance where third-generation family owners appear as changers of governance approach.
... FCNE goals represent the benefits that family members as the dominant coalition of the family business strive for, such as family harmony or family social status. FGPs represent the mechanisms or structures intended to facilitate and structure the relationship between the business family and the family business (Aronoff et al. 2011;Gersick 1997;Neubauer and Lank 2016), and hence guide the business family's behavior (Suess 2014). In this study, we consider in particular family councils and family constitutions as two such structures. ...
... In so doing, we respond to Nordqvist et al.'s (2014) call to consider family firm heterogeneity, in our case with respect to FCNE goals and FGPs to better understand firm behavior. Third, we enhance our understanding of the beneficial spillover effects of FGPs on nonfamily employees, a stakeholder group typically overlooked in the family business governance literature (Suess 2014). FGPs may be beneficial not only to cultivate family harmony and other familyrelated goals (e.g., Berent-Braun and Uhlaner 2012; Sundaramurthy 2008) but also for the business system (Prigge and Thiele 2019). ...
... In this section, we propose that FGPs moderate the relationship between FCNE goals and the adoption of formal HRM practices. FGPs represent the mechanisms intended to facilitate and structure the relationship between the family and the business (Aronoff et al. 2011;Gersick 1997;Neubauer and Lank 2016), hence guiding the family's behavior (Suess 2014). Two commonly used FGPs are the family forum and the family charter. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper aims to investigate the antecedents of formal human resource management (HRM) in private family firms. Specifically, we adopt a socio-emotional wealth perspective to predict the relationship between family-centered noneconomic (FCNE) goals and formal HRM practices. In addition, we rely on the extension of the behavioral theory, i.e., the attention-based view of the firm, to understand the moderating effect of family governance practices (FGPs) on the relation between FCNE goals and formal HRM practices. Based on analyses of a sample of 293 Belgian privately-held family small and medium enterprises, we find that the pursuit of FCNE goals is associated with less formal HRM practices. In addition, simultaneously engaging in FGPs while pursuing FCNE goals reverses this negative effect.
... Given the potentially negative consequences that these challenges can bring, extensive literature has developed to help business families understand the tools that are available to meet these challenges and enhance their continuity (See De Massis et al., 2012;Yu et al., 2012 for a comprehensive reviews). Academics and practitioners both suggest that governance is one of the most important resources available for managing the competing demands of the family and business systems (Aguilera & Crespi-Caldera, 2012;Brenes et al., 2006;Suess, 2014). ...
... The general assumption is that by implementing formal governance practices organisations can enhance their future success. In the context of family firms, governance is often connected to the success and sustainability of the family and the business (Miller & Le Breton-Miller, 2006;Steier et al., 2015;Suess 2014;Villalonga et al., 2015). The family's involvement in a firm introduces important considerations and complexities to our understanding of corporate governance (Cadbury, 2000;Pieper, 2003). ...
... Formal family governance outlines the mechanisms that help the business family organise and manage the relationships between family and business (Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012), family and ownership (Montemerlo & Ward, 2011), and family and management (Mustakallio et al. 2002). The purpose of these formal governance mechanisms is to explicitly articulate and clearly outline the rewards and demands that are linked to being part of the family business, to clearly identify the opportunities for family members who are involved in the business, and to facilitate the flow of trustworthy information among family members (Gersick & Feliu, 2014;Suess, 2014). Family governance is voluntary and is likely to vary greatly among family firms (Jaffe & Lane, 2004). ...
Article
Full-text available
Governance mechanisms help manage, direct, and control people, resources, and the interests of those involved in a firm. In family firms, understanding the use of governance mechanisms is particularly important given their rela-tionship with the sustainability of the family and the business. Even though we know a great deal about family business governance in North America and Europe, we still know very little regarding the use of governance mechanisms in small and medium (SME) family firms in Latin America, nor do we know whether the use of governance mech-anisms impacts financial performance. To address these gaps, this paper presents the results of a survey completed by 2287 representatives of family business SMEs from 24 Latin American countries. Participants indicated the like-lihood of their using different governance mechanisms and responded to questions concerning their businesses. Our results indicate that the small and medium Latin American family firms in our study were not very likely to use formal business and family governance mechanisms, however, the use of formal business governance mechanisms was related to financial performance. The implications of these results for research and practice are discussed.
... Pour ce faire, nous allons définir les concepts clés composants la problématique de ce travail: la gouvernance familiale, la transmission intergénérationnelle, la PME familiale, ensuite nous présenterons les différents mécanismes de la gouvernance familiale, après nous allons présenter les résultats de la littérature expliquant l'impact de la gouvernance familiale sur la transmission intergénérationnelle des PME familiales et enfin le dernier axe sera consacré à l'étude empirique et à la méthodologie de recherche ainsi que les résultats et les conclusions tirés de notre étude. Chrisman, 2009;Yu, Lumpkin, Sorenson et Brigham, 2012) comme une piste de recherche toute entière (Suess 2014). L'entreprise familiale se compose de différents organes et sous-systèmes, et chaque organe dispose des mécanismes de gouvernance qui lui sont spécifiques, ce qui pose le problème de son approche. ...
... L'entreprise familiale se compose de différents organes et sous-systèmes, et chaque organe dispose des mécanismes de gouvernance qui lui sont spécifiques, ce qui pose le problème de son approche. (Suess 2014;Dawson et Parada 2019) ont décrit la gouvernance des entreprises familiales comme "a system of processes and structures put in place at the highest level of the business, family and ownership to make the best possible decisions regarding the direction of the business and assurance of accountability and control", Gallo et Kenyon-Rouvinez (2005) (p. 45). ...
... Ils évoluent en fonction de cycle de vie de la famille et de l'entreprise (Gersicket al., 1997 ;Neubauer et Lank, 1998 ;Carlock et Ward, 2001). Selon les travaux de chercheurs ( Brenes, Madrigal, & Requena, 2011;Martin, 2001) cité par (Suess 2014), la gouvernance familiale fait référence à la capacité de gérer les conflits et assurer l'harmonie familiale, via la mise en place des pratiques de gouvernance, tels que : les assemblées familiales, le conseil familial, etc. (Poza 2010, P. 248). Pour ce travail de recherche, nous retenons cette définition de la gouvernance familiale proposée par ces chercheurs. ...
Article
Full-text available
The importance of family businesses in the economic development of countries around the world is well established (Kenyon-Rouviniez et al., 2004 cited by Bughin, Colot, and Finet, 2010). However, they do not survive generational change (Le Breton-Miller, Miller and Steier, 2004). This alarming reality challenges us as researchers to study this complex issue of transmission. To do so, we study this inheritance phenomenon from the perspective of family governance, while focusing on the role of "family" system governance practices in driving the intergenerational transmission of Moroccan SMEs. To this end, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study of a Moroccan family SME. The results of this investigation confirm the role of the family core governance in planning and conducting the intergenerational transmission of the SME. Résumé Le poids des entreprises familiales dans le développement économique des pays à travers le monde n'est plus à démontrer (Kenyon-Rouviniez et al., 2004 cité par Bughin, Colot, et Finet 2010). Cependant, elles ne survivent pas au changement générationnel. (Le Breton-Miller, Miller et Steier, 2004). Cette réalité alarmante nous interpelle en tant que chercheurs à étudier cette question complexe de la transmission. Pour ce faire, nous étudions ce phénomène successoral suivant la perspective de la gouvernance de la famille, tout en mettant l'accent sur le rôle des pratiques de la gouvernance du système «familial» dans la conduite de la transmission intergénérationnelle de la PME marocaine. À cet effet, nous avons mené une étude qualitative à caractère exploratoire auprès d'une PME familiale marocaine. Les résultats de cette investigation confirment le rôle de la gouvernance de l'organe familial dans la planification et la conduite de la transmission intergénérationnelle de la PME.
... The first one is widely discussed in the literature, so there is sufficient evidence on its effectiveness and implications. However, the family governance perspective presents numerous opportunities for study in academia, and has been a very important topic in recent decades [23]. In relation to family governance, family harmony has a direct impact on the planning adopted in terms of succession [24]. ...
... In this way, the family council represents for the family what the board of directors is for the company [25], and therefore constitutes a body focused on obtaining an efficient balance between ownership, management and family harmony. Family governance bodies are tools for the institutionalization of family relations [23,26] and act as conflict EBEEC prevention mechanisms in the family arena and strengthen family harmony. These mechanisms encourage the family's emotional ties to represent a strategic asset, and no longer a competitive disadvantage. ...
... These mechanisms encourage the family's emotional ties to represent a strategic asset, and no longer a competitive disadvantage. According to literature reviews in the field of family governance mechanisms, the family council is the most prevalent in recent years (1994-2012) [23]. ...
... There is a growing stream of family governance research (Suess, 2014), including many practitioner-oriented articles advocating the use of governance mechanisms such as family assemblies, constitutions, and councils (Aronoff & Ward, 2016). Scholars have begun to examine whether these mechanisms are related to better business performance (e.g., Artega & Menendez-Requejo, 2017), but hitherto this literature mainly concerns single-business families. ...
... Scholars have begun to examine whether these mechanisms are related to better business performance (e.g., Artega & Menendez-Requejo, 2017), but hitherto this literature mainly concerns single-business families. The multi-faceted, multigenerational relationships in business families and the complexity of owning a diverse assets business portfolio have encouraged scholars to pay more attention to the problems of family governance in large business families (Nordqvist & Melin, 2010;Suess, 2014). This research also calls attention to the role of intergenerational wealth transfer mechanisms such as estates and trusts (Harrington, 2012). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Family business is a growing scholarly field that has recently seen calls to investigate different types of family businesses and connect more clearly with adjacent disciplines. We take up these challenges in this De Gruyter Handbook of Business Families by expanding our reach beyond the single-family with a single business. We investigate business families who may engage in joint entrepreneurial, investment, or philanthropic activities, identifying four overlapping research streams. The first is the family behind the firm, which explores the relatively neglected dynamics between individuals with family ties that shape the interaction between family and business. The second is business families with multiple businesses, which looks at a portfolio of activities jointly run by a family in space and time. We describe the third stream of research as governing the business family, which refers to how business families adopt formal rules and processes around their joint activities. Finally, we address the institutionalization of wealth and business families in society. This section explores the multi-generational business family as influenced by and influencing its broader socio-economic context. This handbook positions business families as a vibrant new research field with contributions straddling different disciplines and geographies.
... Among the most common and influential corporate governance bodies within family firms are the general shareholders' meeting, the top management team and the board of directors Suess-Reyes 2014). The general shareholders' meeting is a governance body that deals with legal issues, such as the designation of the CEO and directors, and is usually held once a year On the other hand, the incorporation of women into the labour market, and in particular into positions of certain responsibility, is becoming more and more prominent in today's business world (Informa 2021). ...
... Finally, with respect to general shareholders' meetings, the body par excellence for the representation of ownership, the presence of women is similar to that of management bodies. Special mention requires the fact that the highest proportion of women is found in family-related bodies, i.e. in family governance mechanismsSuess-Reyes 2014), such as the family council and family assembly. In general terms, the Spanish data are in line with the worldwide trend (Corporate Women Directors International 2019).Nowadays, including women in the firms' workforce, and specifically in management and governance positions, is becoming an issue of utmost importance. ...
Thesis
In recent decades there has been a burgeoning and heated debate in the family business world about how family involvement influences innovation. Despite the progress made, the current comprehension of the specific antecedents affecting family firm innovation is limited, with a plethora of contradictory and inconclusive results. Consequently, more research is required to understand the unique but complex innovative behaviour of family firms. In line with the above, the general objective of this thesis is to study the antecedents and consequences of innovation in the context of family firms. Specifically, we are going to investigate how different issues related to corporate governance bodies affect the innovation strategies of family firms and, ultimately, the obtained performance outcomes. This general aim is developed through four specific objectives. The first objective is to provide an overview of the family firm innovation research field through a bibliometric study. The second objective is to examine the indirect effects of technological innovation efficiency in the relationship between family management and firm performance. The third objective is to investigate the moderating role of technological collaborations on the relationship between family management and product innovation efficiency. Finally, the fourth objective is to analyse how women’s presence in different corporate governance structures affects innovation in family firms. In order to achieve the aforementioned objectives, this thesis is structured in four chapters, plus an initial introductory section and a final section for conclusions. The first chapter develops the first specific objective. In this regard, this chapter aims to contextualize the reader by identifying and synthesizing the key topics of the family firm innovation research field and by highlighting future research opportunities. Moreover, this chapter also proposes an integrative framework aimed at advancing the current knowledge on family firm innovation and identifying new research avenues to further develop the field. Chapter two develops the second specific objective. Thus, this chapter analyses the mediating and moderating influence of technological innovation efficiency in the relationship between family management and firm performance. The empirical results show that technological innovation efficiency mediates and moderates the impact of family management on firm performance. Chapter three addresses the third specific objective. In this vein, chapter three analyses the moderating role of technological collaborations with different partners in the relationship between family management and product innovation efficiency. The findings reveal that the positive influence of family management on product innovation efficiency varies according to the type of technological partner with whom the collaboration agreement is established. The fourth chapter corresponds to the fourth specific objective, which is to analyse how women’s presence in different corporate governance structures affects innovation in family firms. In this regard, the results reveal that women’s presence in general shareholders’ meetings and in top management teams negatively influences product innovation in family firms. Finally, in the conclusion section, the main contributions, practical implications, limitations and future research avenues are presented. Hence, this thesis provides valuable contributions to the family firm innovation research field, especially with regard to innovation efficiency, technological collaborations and gender, and their effect on firm performance. Furthermore, this thesis provides interesting practical insights for the development of managerial policies in family firms.
... The establishment of a family institution requires communication between relatives in the family business. Leads to the signing of family, business and relationship agreements (Suess, 2014), which strengthens the relationship between family members and business success (Brenes et al., 2011). Their goal is to reduce conflicts between family members and thus ensure the survival of the company (Botero et al., 2015;Brenes et al., 2011). ...
... Their goal is to reduce conflicts between family members and thus ensure the survival of the company (Botero et al., 2015;Brenes et al., 2011). The family can use these forms of documents to prevent or resolve conflicts that are based on promoting communication (Suess, 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
Cieľom príspevku je návrh nových spôsobov merania výkonnosti podniku, ktoré môžu byť východiskom tvorby inovačných zámerov a zohľadňujú špecifická rodinného podnikania. Objektom skúmania je rodinný podnik drevospracujúceho priemyslu, v ktorom sú aplikované metódy merania výkonnosti zamerané na analýzu konkurencie (benchmarking) a metódy, pomocou ktorých je možné hodnotiť zlepšovanie v čase (náklady na kvalitu, BSC). V príspevku sú využité nasledovné metódy: analýza, syntéza, indukcia, dedukcia, komparácia, opytovacia metóda a matematicko-štatistické metódy. Prínosom príspevku je posúdenie významu týchto metód pre tvorbu inovačných zámerov v budúcnosti.
... With regard to family governance, prior research has found that family governance mechanisms can assist family firms in achieving their economic and non-economic goals (Suess, 2014). When it comes to the governance of the family system, the most common mechanisms used include a family constitution, and family council, and more generally a family forum to communicate issues to the broader family group (Suess, 2014;Villalonga, Amit, Trujillo, & Guzmán, 2015). ...
... With regard to family governance, prior research has found that family governance mechanisms can assist family firms in achieving their economic and non-economic goals (Suess, 2014). When it comes to the governance of the family system, the most common mechanisms used include a family constitution, and family council, and more generally a family forum to communicate issues to the broader family group (Suess, 2014;Villalonga, Amit, Trujillo, & Guzmán, 2015). Consistent with emerging approaches taken by others (e.g., Berent-Braun & Uhlaner, 2012), family governance was measured by way of an index to measure the extent to which the owning family had implemented these three well-recognised governance mechanisms to govern the family's interaction with the business (see Table 1 for more details). ...
Article
Despite the growing body of literature on the internationalisation of family firms, further research is required to understand the underlying factors that influence their international behaviour. Past research has consistently shown that family firms are less likely to adopt an internationalisation strategy compared to their non-family counterparts, yet we still have limited understanding of the underlying reasons why this is so. By incorporating the bifurcation bias concept to the socioemotional wealth perspective of family firm behaviour, we argue that greater attention needs to be given to the influence of family-centred non-economic (FCNE) goals on the family firm’s international behaviour. Using survey data collected on over 300 Australian family firms, regression analysis was used to examine the influence of FCNE goals on the family firm’s extent of international involvement. The results suggest that business families which emphasise FCNE goals are more likely to exhibit a lower attitudinal commitment towards international expansion, which in turn determines the level of international involvement of the family firm. Results also suggest that the extent of international involvement of the family firm has a significant negative effect on the level of achievement of FCNE goals.
... Diese Problematik hat zur Entwicklung von Werkzeugen geführt (z.B. Familienverfassungen), die unter dem Begriff "Family Governance" firmieren (Suess, 2014;Lueger & Frank, 2015;Baus, 2016) und Unternehmerfamilien letztlich organisationsähnliche Merkmale verleihen. Die von Family Governance Maßnahmen erwarteten Lösungen beruhen im Wesentlichen darauf, dass sich eine Familie Regeln gibt, die sowohl sie selbst als auch ihre Stellung zum Unternehmen betreffen und je nach Problemlage unterschiedlich ausdifferenziert sein können. ...
... Weismeier-Sammer, Frank & von Schlippe, 2013), sondern als Unternehmen, das sich im Eigentum einer Familie befindet, ohne dass die Familie einen prägenden Einfluss ausüben möchte. Anlass für Familientreffen ist das Unternehmen, während man sich privat nur mehr in einem kleinen ausgewählten Kreis trifft, zu den man engere Kontakte pflegt, das sind in der Regel Verwandte ersten und zweiten Grades (Wiechers, 2006 (Suess, 2014), denen Verantwortung für das Ganze übertragen wird, was einen bedachtsamen Umgang mit derartigen Funktionen nach sich zieht. Somit kann festgehalten werden, dass Größe und Diversität von business families zahlreiche Möglichkeiten eröffnen, unternehmens-und familienbezogene Spielregeln zu erschließen. ...
... Finally, it is curious that the realization of the need for family governance structures and processes required the intimate emotional experiences of another family's crises and conflicts. Given the myriad number of books, academic research, and practitioner advice on the value of family governance (i.e., Groysberg & Bell, 2014;Suess, 2014;Zellweger, 2017), it is somewhat surprising that this common knowledge would not be practiced in a sizable family business. Yet, it is these stories told about who we are, "we are blood [family], we'll figure this out [conflict], I'm not worried," that carries so much weight in the legacy of subsequent generations. ...
Article
We use concepts from rhetorical history and mnemonic communities to expand on the notion of “intermarriage” in a family business as the merger of shared histories among family members, nonfamily members, and individuals from other families and suggest that a common mnemonic narrative defines the parameters of the family business rather than the structural properties of the firm or the genetic relationships among family members. Our analysis reveals how fundamental family business practices can be changed when confronted with the intimate knowledge of the rhetorical history of the failure of others.
... The tethering of resources among family members means that the founding family can exert significant influence over a firm, even with relatively small levels of equity and modest top management team and board membership. This influence grants the founding family a high level of control that may naturally elevate the family's representation, authority, power, and legitimacy in decision making (Miller & Le Breton-Miller, 2006;Suess, 2014). As a result, family firms may take fundamentally distinctive routes to entrenchment that leverage the embeddedness of the founding family in firm governance to make decisions motivated by the SEW concerns of the family. ...
Article
Full-text available
Drawing on principal-principal agency theory and the socioemotional wealth (SEW) perspective, this paper explores the motivations and mechanisms regarding the founding family's contingent choices of governance provisions that facilitate managerial entrenchment, which can potentially threaten firm performance. By investigating S&P 1,500 firms between 2007 and 2017 and employing quasi-experimental treatment effects analyses, this study finds that family firms are less likely to utilize the E-index provisions than non-family firms in general. Further, family firms tend to adopt more E-index provisions when the first generation of the founding family remains involved in the firm. However, as these firms age, they rely less on the E-index provisions to entrench family managers. Consequently, this paper expands current research on the governance of publicly-traded family firms by illustrating the differences between family and non-family firms as well as the impact of transgenerational family governance on the use of entrenchment mechanisms over time.
... Good communication between members of the family and between stakeholders of the firm(Helin & Jabri, 2016) influence the succession process by legitimizing the chosen successor. Communication of the succession planning process gives an important acknowledgment by the predecessor of the passing on of leadership and responsibility for the family business.The establishment of family governance mechanisms has been identified as the panacea to the planning of the transition(Suess, 2014; Chittoor and Das, 2007;Blummentritt, 2006). These comprise family protocols and family councils which must be well-established to regulate the family business, maintain healthy family relations and develop rules for the selection of successors(Cabrera-Saurez et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose-This article aims to review the literature on succession planning for family-owned construction firms. The purpose is to unearth and contextualize the succession planning information within the construction industry, particularly for family-owned construction firms. Design/methodology/approach-A systematic and meticulous literature search of family-business magazines, and trustworthy journal databases was carried out after a brainstorming session to determine what relevant information would be unearthed for the study. This resulted in search criteria of several terms related to the topic (‗succession', ‗succession planning', ‗transition planning', ‗family firms', ‗family-owned construction firms', ‗family-owned business', ‗agency cost theory', resource-based view', and ‗theory of planned behavior') and using connectors AND and OR to link the descriptors. The retrieval process resulted in over 500 articles and the filtering process cleaned the data to over 100 which literature resulted in a conceptual framework being proposed. Findings-Key findings of the study include the significance of succession planning in family-owned construction firms, drivers, barriers, application of the agency cost, resource-based view and planned behavior theories to underpin succession planning, and the conceptual framework in which family-owned construction firms, in particular, can rely on when undertaking succession planning. Limitations/implications-The weakness of this paper is the lack of theoretical development and being a literature review does not concern itself also with the causal relationship of the constructs in the framework. The findings highlight key areas for future research and help to contextualize the topic for any potential new developments in succession planning for family-owned construction firms. Practical implications-Family-owned construction firms are getting extinct by the day and the statistics are startling mainly due to a lack of succession planning. Thus, firms especially family-owned construction firms are admonished to pay attention and employ adequate resources for succession planning to promote their long-term survival and prosperity. Originality/value-This paper gives researchers and industry practitioners insights into the succession planning process. It paves the way for an exploration of the applicability of succession planning processes as applied in other sectors to be tried in the construction sector. The value this paper comes with is that it employs agency theory, resource-based view theory, and theory of planned behavior to reinforce the study whilst developing/ proposing a conceptual framework based on the available information to guide family-owned construction firms in Ghana to undertake succession planning. KEYWORDS-Succession, Succession planning, family firm, family-owned construction firm, family-owned business, agency cost, resource-based view, and theory of planned behavior.
... For the family system, this process is enabled by the establishment of formal family governance mechanisms, such as a family council, family meeting, or family constitution (Arteaga and Menéndez-Requejo, 2017) that serve to help build a well-functioning business family that has one clear shared vision for the business, does not impede the business system through destructive family conflict, and speaks with one voice to its internal and external partners (Suess, 2014). Equally important and often complementary to formal family governance are informal family governance mechanisms (Astrachan, 2010;Bloemen-Bekx et al., 2021;Chrisman et al., 2018;Pieper, 2007) as the "relational, interactive and self-enforcing mechanisms [e.g., sharing legacy stories] used by a business family to help nurture more or less complex family relationships and manage expectations" (Bloemen-Bekx et al., 2021, p. 2) because they help foster highquality family relationships, cohesion, and affective commitment to the family firm and business family within and among generations. ...
Article
Full-text available
Plain English Summary Openness as boundary work is a significant challenge for many family firms but is critically important in an increasingly complex business environment. We develop a generative framework and future research agenda. Our main implications are for (1) research: our conceptual framework on openness as boundary work and the research questions we put forward as a critical future research agenda open up many possibilities for further developing meaningful and useful theory on openness, boundaries, and boundary work in family firms and entrepreneurial families; (2) practice: we help family firms, entrepreneurial families, and family business advisors better understand the dynamics, complexities, and consequences of openness to make more informed boundary decisions; and (3) society: when family firms open up their boundaries, not only can they create more opportunities for other societal actors, but they can also generate more value than they can do alone.
... Governance mechanisms such as family councils and family constitutions are the most frequently advised tools for mitigating current and potential conflicts among the members of intermingled systems of family, ownership and business, that multiply with the growth of both the family and the business Howorth et al., 2007). These structures facilitate the professionalization of family and business relationships (Blumentritt et al., 2007;Poza, 2010;Songini, 2006;Suess, 2014;Waldkirch et al., 2017). They help in leading younger generations as well as reinforcing family members' commitment to the firm (Gersick and Feliu, 2014). ...
Purpose This study aims to broaden the multidimensional conceptualization of family business professionalization, and to investigate how professionalization influences the financial performance of family firms, in the context of private family firms. Design/methodology/approach Taking a quantitative research approach, the study empirically examines the effect of professionalization on family firm performance, using a sample of 111 privately held Turkish family firms. The hypotheses were tested using regression analysis and the independent samples t -test. Findings The results indicate that the professionalization of family businesses has a positive effect on their financial performance, and the professionalization of employees is the prominent dimension of professionalization in this effect. Research limitations/implications This study advances the understanding of how professionalization influences family firm performance by providing additional empirical evidence regarding the positive influence of multifaceted family business professionalization on financial performance. Practical implications The professionalization framework depicted in this study helps owners, managers, or consultants of family businesses assess the professionalization level of their firm and understand the performance effects of each of the family business professionalization dimensions on financial performance. It can also serve as a roadmap for family firms to professionalize and achieve better performance. Originality/value Unlike previous studies, this study incorporates employees, organizational culture and work environment, often neglected in the family business literature, into the multidimensional family business professionalization construct, thus extending previous research. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationship between family businesses professionalization and firm performance.
... Thus, policy makers should promote R&D spending in family firms through different actions, such as economic incentives for innovation activities, greater innovative subsidies and informative talks regarding the access to these resources. Moreover, to make proper R&D investments, firm managers might consider the option of establishing the "rules of the game" (Brenes, Madrigal, & Requena, 2011) through family governance mechanisms (Suess-Reyes, 2014;Umans et al., 2018). For example, family constitutions could limit the dividends paid out to family owners (Block, 2012), allowing firm managers to dedicate financial resources to interesting innovation projects, which could be important for the firm's future. ...
Chapter
The aim of this chapter is to analyze the moderating effect of family management on the relationship between R&D inputs and R&D outcomes, that is, R&D productivity. Using a longitudinal sample of 337 Spanish privately held manufacturing firms, the results show that in general terms, although family managed firms invest less in R&D than their non-family managed counterparts, they reinforce the conversion of R&D inputs into R&D outcomes. Moreover, the findings reveal that the strengthening effect of family management on R&D productivity is contingent upon the level of R&D expenditures. Thus, this chapter contributes to shedding some light into the debate regarding innovation management in privately held family firms.
... A Governança Coorporativa visa aumentar o valor da organização e contribuir para sua continuidade, monitorando o relacionamento entre seus diferentes membros, sejam eles acionistas, conselheiros, diretores, entre outros (IBGC, 2008). Ela consiste em mecanismos voluntários estabelecidos pelos indivíduos, que facilitam e fortalecem as relações entre os membros da família, visando a melhor tomada de decisão na direção da visão da família e assegurando o controle (Suáre e Santana-Martín, 2004;Suess-Reyes, 2014;Umans et al., 2018). (2017) ...
Article
Full-text available
As empresas familiares apresentam índices significativos de mortalidade, sendo o processo de sucessão do fundador crucial para sua sobrevivência. Ao contrário de empresas de capital aberto, a sucessão na empresa familiar envolve alterações nas dimensões família, propriedade e empresa. A utilização de mecanismos de governança nesse processo é útil para auxiliar na separação de papéis de cada indivíduo e para formalização de fóruns de debate para cada uma das dimensões. Contudo, devido a limitação de recursos, muitas vezes é necessário priorizar a implementação de alguns mecanismos. Dado esse contexto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi entender qual a importância de cada mecanismo de governança familiar no processo de sucessão. Para tanto, foi realizado um estudo de caso em uma empresa de transportes que implementou três dos quatro principais mecanismos de governança familiar citados na literatura. Por meio de entrevistas, consultas a documentos eobservação de uma reunião do conselho de administração foi avaliada a percepção de importância dos sócios, familiares e funcionários em relação a cada mecanismo de governança familiar. A diretoria executiva e o conselho de administração foram identificados como os mecanismos mais importantes, enquanto o conselho de sócios e o conselho familiar tornam-se relevantes em determinadas situações e para grupos específicos. Desse modo, recomenda-se priorizar a implementação da diretoria executiva e do conselho de administração em relação aos demais mecanismos de governança familiar.
... Secondly, we do not consider the role of family governance contexts due to the lack of data. Indeed, family governance is important as recent literature highlights its impact on innovation strategy (Scholes and Hughes, 2018) and on information asymmetry issues (Suess, 2014) which can pave the way for future research. ...
... Ebenso wie im Unternehmen braucht daher auch die Unternehmerfamilie eine implizite oder explizite Strategie bzw. Governance, um die Kontinuität des Familienunternehmens (auch im Rahmen der Nachfolge) sowie den Zusammenhalt der Unternehmerfamilie zu sichern (Suess, 2014). Die Funktionsweise der Unternehmerfamilie kann unterschiedliche Auswirkungen auf den Umgang mit Konflikten, die Ausgestaltung und Bewältigung der Nachfolge und die Innovations-bzw. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Die Unternehmerfamilie ist eine wichtige Ressource für das Familienunternehmen. Sie kann entweder einen Wettbewerbsvorteil bringen oder, im kritischen Fall, auch zur Beeinträchtigung bis hin zur Zerstörung des Familienunternehmens führen. Gerade in der Nachfolgephase kann die Funktionsweise der Unternehmerfamilie gravierende Auswirkungen auf den Umgang mit Konflikten, die Ausgestaltung und Bewältigung der Nachfolge und die Innovations- bzw. Wandelfähigkeit des Unternehmens haben. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist die Herausarbeitung familiärer Dynamiken und deren Einfluss auf die Nachfolge sowie der Rolle der Unternehmerfamilie für die Entwicklung von Innovationen mithilfe einer Good Practice-Fallstudie.
... Für einen eigenständigen Weg ist es auch erforderlich, der nachfolgenden Generationen einen eigenständigen Weg und eigenständige Schwerpunkte zu ermöglichen. (Suess, 2014). Die Fähigkeit, Innovationsziele, -aktivitäten und -kulturaspekte regelmäßig zu überdenken, wird durch die rege harmonieorientierte Kommunikation zwischen den Familienmitgliedern maßgeblich erleichtert. ...
Book
Full-text available
Die Innovationskraft von Familienunternehmen als tragende Säule unserer Wirtschaft ist ein wesentlicher Faktor für den Erfolg und das langfristige Überleben dieses Unternehmenstyps. So unterschiedlich dieser Typ von Unternehmen ist, so unterschiedlich ist auch sein Innovationsverhalten in Bezug auf die Innovationsart, den Innovationsgrad, die Gestaltung des Innovationsprozesses und die betrieblichen und familiären Rahmenbedingungen. Nach dem Motto "Lernen von den Besten" werden anhand von Good Practice Fällen fünf erfolgreiche Familienunternehmen analysiert und deren Innovationsverhalten dargestellt. Die detaillierte Darstellung der Fallergebnisse eröffnet fundierte Einblicke für die Theorie und vor allem für die Praxis. Den Abschluss bildet eine zusammenfassende Reflexion, die zu "11 Geboten erfolgreichen Innovierens" verdichtet wird und Familienunternehmen als Inspiration für ihr eigenes Innovationsmanagement dienen kann.
... On the business side, common measures include hiring based on expertise, decentralizing authority, formal training, and implementing governance and control systems (e.g., Dekker et al., 2015;Kaehr Serra and Thiel, 2019;Marett et al., 2020;Stewart & Hitt, 2012). On the family side, professionalization often includes the creation of family councils and use of formal shareholder agreements and employment policies (Arteaga & Menéndez-Requejo, 2017;Suess, 2014). Additionally, informal measures aimed to strengthen family bonds and prepare the next generation for leadership play an important role in building family capacity that promotes firm innovation (Chirico et al., 2011) and familial well-being (Nordstrom & Jennings, 2017). ...
Article
This paper proposes a systemic model on the intertwined relations among managerialization, professionalization and firm economic performance, considering both business‐ and family‐specific features and issues. It sheds light on the role that, in the family business, the firm economic performance may play in favouring a positive development of both the business and the family itself. It aims at understanding how, in family businesses, the firm managerialization and professionalization may represent relevant drivers of firm performance. A Systems Thinking model based on causal loop diagrams was developed, to provide a clear framing of the interrelationships among the various aspects at stake. The conceptual model combines with systemic perspective all the variables and relationships that come into play when considering jointly the growth and development of the company and the family. This paper provides not only a conceptual background but also practical insights for family business' owners, managers and consultants.
Conference Paper
The amount of research on family businesses’ analysis has increased significantly in recent years, thus showing the high importance of the topic. In most countries, family businesses occupy a prominent place in contributing to the economy with the added value they produce. However, less attention has been paid to the professionalization of family businesses and the exploration and presentation of the related literature. The professionalization of family business is a significant research concern in the entrepreneurship and governance literature. In the context of family businesses, professionalization initially meant nothing more than hiring an outside, non-family manager. For today, the content of professionalization has expanded, and a multidimensional model has evolved: a broader, deeper understanding has evolved, which involves other vital aspects such as developing formal control and human resource systems, decentralization of authority, formal strategic planning, or top-level activeness. This study aims to present the essential international literature on professionalization and provide a comprehensive overview of the studies published. The literature review mainly summarizes the results of the last twenty years and closely related articles. The paper follows the next logic; in the first part, the definition of professionalization is introduced along with its benefits and challenges. Then, based on the research methodology presented, the related empirical and theoretical studies are examined. In the end, the review summarizes the key findings in a table.
Article
This article studies the relationship between familiness, approached from a new systems theory perspective, and decision-making quality in family firm top management teams. We focus on two potential explanations of this relationship by examining the mediating role of emotional dissonance and perceived team support. A hand-collected multiple-respondent dataset of 212 top managers from 45 Belgian family firm TMTs shows a positive relationship between familiness and decision-making quality, mediated by the level of perceived team support. Moreover, we find that familiness decreases the level of emotional dissonance experienced by these top managers.
Article
Purpose Scholars and practitioners agree that governance practices are at the core of what differentiates family firms from other forms of business. Yet, there is a lack of consensus in the extant literature about how and the extent to which family governance affects firm performance. This study aims to address the matter by taking a more comprehensive unified systems perspective to explore the pathways through which variations in family governance mechanisms simultaneously affect both the business and the family system. Design/methodology/approach This study utilises a global dataset sourced from a survey and structural equation modelling to empirically measure several intermediate and final outcomes of family governance. Findings This study finds that the use of family protocols, as well as formal and informal meetings, have positive effects on the functioning of the family, whereas family involvement in the top management team diminishes the firm's competitive advantage. In turn, this study demonstrates that both family functioning and competitive advantage are positively related to firm performance. Originality/value By taking into consideration the complexity of the family and business systems, and measuring their interlinkages, this study advances knowledge by providing a more complete picture of the family governance/firm performance relationship.
Article
Full-text available
The present guest editorial offers a review of the different conceptualizations of families in business used in research to date, shedding light on the unique characteristics of each type. Understanding the family through the lens of social systems theory offers a means for researchers to study contextually embedded family systems, offering a foundation for studying differences among families. We demonstrate that the family business system (ownership, business, family) is incomplete without a fourth component, that of the family in business. We then present the papers included in this special issue and highlight the collective contribution to research in the fields of family business and family entrepreneurship and provide directions for future research.
Article
Full-text available
Most farms are struggling with aggravating economic, social and ecological conditions. If family farms want to survive in the long run, they need to develop innovation strategies. In line with the resource-based view, this paper argues that market orientation and multiple family generations in management are valuable resources of a family farm, which can contribute to innovation by facilitating the development of innovative ideas. This paper also explores the role of farm performance as a moderator. Since small- and medium-sized businesses in rural areas tend to lack growth orientation, it is assumed that family farms do not feel a strong urge to make use of their innovation potentials unless their performance falls to a critically low level. A regression analysis is conducted to test the relationships with a sample of 690 Austrian family farms. The results confirm the positive effect of both market orientation and multiple generations in management on innovation. As expected, farm performance moderates this relationship negatively. The findings are discussed against the backdrop of the family business, innovation and farming literature and suggestions are made how family farms can make best use of the market and the family as two important potential innovation sources.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose It is widely accepted that coauthorship and collaboration promotes intellectual partnerships and improves the quality of publications. This paper examines the relationship between collaboration, productivity and publications in the field of family business. Design/methodology/approach The authors identify the most prolific authors, affiliations and countries and focus on the evolution of research in the field of family business. In doing so, the authors employ social network analysis to discover the structure of the networks and the ways in which authors, institutions and countries interact. Findings The empirical results show that collaboration is positively related to productivity, and there is significant evidence that the shaped networks exhibit small-world characteristics, a condition in which collaboration within authors becomes integrated in conjunction with time. Practical implications The findings highlight the mechanics of collaborative research production and can be useful to understand the importance of collaboration patterns to be followed in the field of family business. Originality/value The contributions are as follows: (a) application of social network analysis to model the coauthorship patterns among individuals, institutions and countries in family business; (b) distinguishing the most degree-central authors in the social network of collaborating academics; (c) investigation of the academic collaborations in family business that have the characteristics of a small-world social network and (d) suggesting a unique connection, through published keywords, between the research priorities of the most central or prolific authors with the research trends in the family business literature. The authors demonstrate that authors' collaboration becomes integrated in conjunction with time.
Article
Burma Drinx Group (BDG), a large family-owned conglomerate in Myanmar, operates in several industries but has the largest presence in the soft drinks industry, led by its flagship company, Burma Drinx Company (BDC). The case explores the challenges and issues that BDC and BDG are experiencing as a family-owned conglomerate operating in a ‘non-friendly’ business environment, and a turbulent political and economic context. It focuses on an urgent topic, the corporate governance transformation of BDC and BDG. The reader is invited to understand the specificities of BDG’s internal environment and to manage the idiosyncrasies of this family business conglomerate related to its corporate governance system. BDC’s decision-makers face critical challenges for the future and have to completely rebuild the governance system. This current case follows a first case (Degravel & Tun, 2021) titled BDG(A) ‘Strategizing for Succession in a Family Business’, which described and reflected on the process of succession that BDG implemented to successfully replace the former CEO and founder of the company, Aung Win. The current case proposes a consulting-case style where analysis enables the provision of relevant solutions to the top management. Material from the academic literature about corporate governance and change management is offered as a resource. This case continues the story of BDG after its CEO succession.
Article
Purpose The aim of this research is to analyze empirical evidence of the effect of governance structure (GS) on perceived success of the succession process. It is also reported that in India, family firms have a more informal organization structure and governance and have an informal and unplanned approach to bringing the successors into family business. Previous studies have reported that GS is an important factor for a successful succession process. This study examines the role of management succession planning as an intervening variable to achieve perceived success of the succession process. Design/methodology/approach Data have been collected using a questionnaire schedule with 113 respondents who are successors from family business firms in Kerala, India. The study uses snowball sampling technique. Partial least square-structural equation modeling has been used to do data analysis. Findings The results of the study showed that GS has a significant positive effect on the success of the succession process. GS has a significant positive effect on management succession planning. Management succession planning partially mediates the relationship between GS and perceived success of the succession process. Research limitations/implications The results of the study indicate the effect of GS on the relationship between, perceived success of the succession process and management succession planning. The mediating role of management succession planning in the above relationship is also confirmed. Therefore, before starting the succession process a good GS should be put in place for ensuring the success of the succession process. Family firms must implement the succession plan well to make the succession process successful. Originality/value The main contribution of the study is to empirically investigate the effect of GS and management succession planning to enhance the success of the succession process.
Technical Report
Full-text available
This report seeks to shed light on what holistic family governance involves in practice, and on the issues that families need to pay attention to when designing their family governance system. It provides an overview of the current state of research on family governance and shares the findings from new research to present evidence-based guidance to motivate business families to reflect on current family governance and explore new ways of managing and inspiring their family shareholder/beneficiary group so that they can perpetuate their family’s stewardship for many generations to come. Based on survey and case study data from business-owning families in the UK and beyond, we provide suggestions for business families at any stage of their life cycle and governance journey who seek to engage in meaningful conversations within their own families and with their advisors.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the influence that family members exert on the extent and frequency of substantive conflict within family firms across generations as a result of their familial relationship (distance) with the owner/manager of the firm and the positions these family members occupy in the family workgroup and social (non-work) group. Following Beckhard and Dyer (1983), the construct of substantive conflict was vested in four key issues pertinent to family firms: (1) ownership continuity or change; (2) executive leadership continuity or change; (3) power and asset distribution; and (4) management's vision for the role of the firm in society. The results establish a relationship between conflict in a family business and the composition of the family's work group, non-work (social) group, and the extensiveness of the family's social interactions. The relationships between conflict and family influence were found to be moderated by the generations (first, second, third, or later) among involved family businesses.
Article
Full-text available
This paper challenges the prevalent notion that family-owned firms are more risk averse than publicly owned firms. Using behavioral theory, we argue that for family firms, the primary reference point is the loss of their socioemotional wealth, and to avoid those losses, family firms are willing to accept a significant risk to their performance; yet at the same time, they avoid risky business decisions that might aggravate that risk. Thus, we propose that the predictions of behavioral theory differ depending on family ownership. We confirm our hypotheses using a population of 1,237 family-owned olive oil mills in Southern Spain who faced the choice during a 54-year period of becoming a member of a cooperative, a decision associated with loss of family control but lower business risk, or remaining independent, which preserves the family's socioemotional wealth but greatly increases its performance hazard. As shown in this study, family firms may be risk willing and risk averse at the same time.
Article
Full-text available
This case illustrates the evolution of family relationships in a multigenerational family business and its impact on performance. Building on a systems perspective, it uses the organizational finance, family therapy, and family business literatures to explain how and why family relationships in a large French food distribution group weakened over the life cycle and lead to increasing conflicts of interests between active and non-active family shareholders, thus to the loss of the family control over the business. The case highlights the role of values transmission across generations and governance mechanisms. Finally, it suggests key learning lessons for family businesses to strengthen their family relationships and ensure the family continuity in the business.
Article
Full-text available
This article makes the case for the socioemotional wealth (SEW) approach as the potential dominant paradigm in the family business field. The authors argue that SEW is the most important differentiator of the family firm as a unique entity and, as such, helps explain why family firms behave distinctively. In doing so, the authors review the concept of SEW, its different dimensions, and its links with other theoretical approaches. The authors also address the issue of how to measure this construct and offer various alternatives for operationalizing it. Finally, they offer a set of topics that can be pursued in future studies using the SEW approach.
Article
Full-text available
The present study investigates the link between family ownership/control/management and firm performance, focusing on financial relations. This study aims to reconstruct the existing theoretical framework and systematize the current state of knowledge, distinguishing between widely corroborated findings and those that have not been clearly substantiated. Towards this aim, the present work analyses 23 articles that were selected according to systematic review criteria in the most relevant databases for social sciences research. The lack of homogeneity in the results of previous studies suggests that the relationships between family business and corporate performance are complex and very probably moderated or mediated by factors that have not been included in these analyses. The main areas that need further investigation are as follows: (i) the multidimensional concept of performance and the shift from wealth creation to value creation, (ii) the validity and perspectives of theoretical approaches to the study of family firms, (iii) the family business definition dilemma and its implications, and (iv) the growing interest in privately held family firms. These topics represent strategic challenges and opportunities for future research.
Article
Full-text available
Writing a faulty literature review is one of many ways to derail a dissertation. This article summarizes some pivotal information on how to write a high-quality dissertation literature review. It begins with a discussion of the purposes of a review, presents taxonomy of literature reviews, and then discusses the steps in conducting a quantitative or qualitative literature review. The article concludes with a discussion of common mistakes and a framework for the self-evaluation of a literature review.
Article
Full-text available
To promote theoretical development in family business research, this research identified 327 dependent/outcome variables used in 257 empirical family business studies in 1998-2009. In four studies, the authors categorized outcome variables, developed a numerical taxonomy with seven clusters (performance, strategy, social and economic impact, governance, succession, family business roles, and family dynamics) plotted along two dimensions (business–family and short-term–long-term), validated their research, and identified missing outcome variables and variables that deserve more attention. Experts agree that family business roles, succession, and family dynamics make the family business domain unique and that noneconomic performance and family-specific topics deserve more attention.
Article
Full-text available
There is a long tradition of systemic approaches in family business research, although recent developments of the theory of social systems have been widely ignored. This paper gives a brief overview of these systemic approaches and models and then introduces the most important assertions made by the modern theory of social systems. Systems theory no longer considers individuals as parts of the system but assumes that the basic elements of a social system are acts of communication. In each system (family, business, ownership), a specific communication pattern evolves and each system operates on the basis of a specific functional logic. Families operate on the basis of attachment communication, businesses operate on the basis of communicated decisions and ownership operates on the basis of legally secured communication. Each of these three structurally coupled systems provides a specific context. The functional logics are context markers and assign meaning to the communicative acts. In order to understand how a family business functions, it is important to understand the concrete functional logics and the structural coupling of the three systems.
Article
Full-text available
We introduce the construct of organizational social capital and develop a model of its components and consequences. Organizational social capital is defined as a resource reflecting the character of social relations within the organization. It is realized through members' levels of collective goal orientation and shared trust, which create value by facilitating successful collective action. We discuss employment practices as primary mechanisms by which social capital is fostered or discouraged within organizations.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the influence that family members exert on the extent and frequency of substantive conflict within family firms across generations as a result of their familial relationship (distance) with the owner/manager of the firm and the positions these family members occupy in the family work group and social (non-work) group. Following Beckhard and Dyer (1983), the construct of substantive conflict was vested in four key issues pertinent to family firms: (1) ownership continuity or change; (2) executive leadership continuity or change; (3) power and asset distribution; and (4) management's vision for the role of the firm in society. The results establish a relationship between conflict in a family business and the composition of the family's work group, non-work (social) group, and the extensiveness of the family's social interactions. The relationships between conflict and family influence were found to be moderated by the generations (first, second, third, or later) among involved family businesses.
Article
This paper integrates elements from the theory of agency, the theory of property rights and the theory of finance to develop a theory of the ownership structure of the firm. We define the concept of agency costs, show its relationship to the 'separation and control' issue, investigate the nature of the agency costs generated by the existence of debt and outside equity, demonstrate who bears the costs and why, and investigate the Pareto optimality of their existence. We also provide a new definition of the firm, and show how our analysis of the factors influencing the creation and issuance of debt and equity claims is a special case of the supply side of the completeness of markets problem.
Article
Family Meetings demonstrates the value of family meetings and how to effectively use family meetings to achieve family and business milestones. In its information-packed pages you'll learn ten benefits of effective family meetings; how to use family meetings to plan for future ownership and participation in the family business; how to use family meetings to preserve family traditions and history and to recognize and resolve conflicts; the key questions to be dealt with at family meetings; how to organize and run effective family meetings; how family meetings change as the business evolves; how to separate family issues from business issues; how to use rituals and ceremonies for bonding and recognition.
Chapter
Corporate governance has gained tremendous attention in recent years, While the process is greatly discussed, it is not always well understood, especially in family businesses, Family business governance is a system of processes and structures put in place at the highest level of the business, family, and ownership to make the best possible decisions regarding the direction of the business and assurance of accountability and control In a well-developed family business, this involves understanding how the business and its governance structure — the board of directors and the management’s executive committee — interact with the family and its structures (the family council, shareholders’ committee, and so on; see Figure 4.1) This chapter explores the respective roles of these structures, their composition, and their function.
Article
It is generally accepted that a family's involvement in the business makes the family business unique; but the literature continues to have difficulty defining the family business. We argue for a distinction between theoretical and operational definitions. A theoretical definition must identify the esence that distinguishes the family business from other businesses. It is the standard against which operational definitions must be measured. We propose a theoretical definition based on behavior as the essence of a family business. Our conceptual analysis shows that most of the operational definitions based on the components of family involvement overlap with our theoretical definition. Our empirical results suggest, however, that the components of family involvement typically used in operational definitions are weak predictors of intentions and, therefore, are not always reliable for distinguishing family businesses from non-family ones.
Article
In this paper we draw on recent progress in the theory of (1) property rights, (2) agency, and (3) finance to develop a theory of ownership structure for the firm.1 In addition to tying together elements of the theory of each of these three areas, our analysis casts new light on and has implications for a variety of issues in the professional and popular literature, such as the definition of the firm, the “separation of ownership and control,” the “social responsibility” of business, the definition of a “corporate objective function,” the determination of an optimal capital structure, the specification of the content of credit agreements, the theory of organizations, and the supply side of the completeness-of-markets problem.
Article
Finding the right successor to a well-loved founder or president is often the most difficult task an organization can face--and the challenge can be even greater for family-run businesses. Succeeding Generations explores leadership transitions in family businesses, offering a clear-eyed assessment of the different options, from direct succession to building partnerships between siblings and cousins. Family-owned companies may dominate the worldwide business landscape, yet surprisingly few are successfully passed down from one generation to the next, and fewer still reach the third generation intact. Author Ivan Lansberg, an organizational psychologist who grew up in a family business, examines the reasons behind this high failure rate and reveals the factors that contribute to long-term success. He offers practical advice on how to mentor successors, how to set up a systematic selection process, and how to make the best use of the board of directors during times of transition. With a wealth of examples from companies in the United States, Europe, and Latin America, Succeeding Generations provides a thoughtful and comprehensive look at the sensitive dynamics of leadership succession in family businesses.
Article
Recent thinking about top management has been influenced by alternative models of man.1 Economic approaches to governance such as agency theory tend to assume some form of homo-economicus, which depict subordinates as individualistic, opportunistic, and self-serving. Alternatively, sociological and psychological approaches to governance such as stewardship theory depict subordinates as collectivists, pro-organizational, and trustworthy. Through this research, we attempt to reconcile the differences between these assumptions by proposing a model based upon the subordinate's psychological attributes and the organization's situational characteristics.
Article
The demographic and essence approaches have emerged as two separate streams to tackle the issue of how the family affects family firm performance. However, this debate is still open. After analyzing 80 published articles from 2007 to 2011, I conclude that the contradictions between these two approaches come from implicit assumptions that are not modeled when each approach is tested individually. Therefore, the aim of this article is to put the demographic and essence approaches to the test. To reach this objective, I developed a theoretical framework to analyze the relationship between family management involvement, family-oriented strategic decision making, and family firm performance. I conclude that contradictory conclusions may result from each model whether they are tested separately or together.
Article
This study evaluates a human ecology conceptual framework for family businesses where the value orientations within the family business system are considered a distinct construct from unity in values. This study uses the 2007 American Family Business Survey to differentiate values from unity. Findings from this study support this human ecology differentiation and results include; a lack of relationship between unity and values, and the disproportionate role of unity in the creation and maintenance of formal processes, whereas values, and specifically “family-first” businesses tend to preference the creation of family councils. Implications include relevance for future investigative studies focused on the role of family involvement, and practical implication for the creation and maintenance of formal processes such as family councils.
Article
The Resource-Based View (RBV) of competitive advantage provides a theoretical framework from the field of strategic management for assessing the competitive advantages of family firms. The RBV isolates idiosyncratic resources that are complex, intangible, and dynamic within a particular firm. The bundle of resources that are distinctive to a firm as a result of family involvement are identified as the “familiness” of the firm. This approach provides a research and practice method for assessing the specific behavioral and social phenomena within a firm that provide an advantage. Using a familiness model for assessing competitive advantage overcomes many of the problems associated with the generic claim that family companies have an advantage over nonfamily companies. It also provides a unified systems perspective of family firm performance.
Article
Family meetings develop family unity through the creation of perceived shared beliefs. The article presents a model with strategic implications showing how shared beliefs lead to collective action, which leads to outcomes and then the reassessment of the shared beliefs. Finally, the article reports on initial research on the reliability of instruments developed to explore one aspect of this model: The creation of shared beliefs through family meetings. The initial results suggest that perceptions of shared beliefs may be an important stimulant of collective family activity.
Article
Over 600 family firms were involved in this examination of the impact of human resource management (HRM) and professional governance practices on family business success and survival. Our findings identified some of the most prevalent family firm HRM practices and found significant positive correlations among HRM practices, gross firm revenues, and CEO personal income levels. The results support prior arguments for competitive advantage in the marketplace gained through effective use of HRM practices. An interesting additional finding was that while boards of directors, strategic planning, and frequent family meetings were correlated with business longevity over multiple generations, succession planning was not. Such practices are important. for current competitive advantage and may also be crucial to the longevity of the business.
Article
There is considerable definitional confusion concerning the term family business. This chapter addresses this issue through two complementary approaches: a structure-based approach, which considers family involvement infirm ownership and management, and an intention-based approach, which focuses on the realized and unrealized value preferences of the organization's upper echelons.
Article
The authors examine the relationship between the life cycles of fathers and sons who work together, concluding that the quality of the work relationship varies as a function of their respective life stages. The intersection of their individual developmental paths can have positive or negative effects on the nature of the work relationship, on the resolution of such problem issues as succession, and on productivity.
Article
It is difficult to get a clear picture of the relative influence of management journals because previous studies have focused on a single sub-area in the field over a relatively restricted number of years, and/or have used inconsistent criteria to judge journal influence. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine journal influence using citations from 28 journals over the past two decades. The findings show that the top seven journals accounted for 61 percent of all of the citations in the journals included, and that the three journals that showed the greatest increase in influence over the past 20 years were AMJ, AMR, and SMJ. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Article
This explorative research paper illuminates the governance systems in Spanish family businesses, and evaluates the extent to which they pursue good governance practise both in the business and family areas. Empirical evidence is drawn from a database of 112 sizeable Spanish firms, and the results show the absolute dominance of the leading family in the ownership, control and management of sample firms. Approximately half of the members of the board tend to be insiders and more than two-thirds are family members. It emerges that generational firms (with third generation and beyond owner-managers) exhibit greater similarity in their governance structures to first generation firms than second generation ones; this might be due to the so-called “pruning” which is used as a survival mechanism. Overall, it emerges that family firms have a very low degree of board regulation by formal rules and family governance systems are hardly developed.
Article
Based on the social capital, conflict, and ethics literatures, this study introduces a new concept, the family point of view, and provides theoretical arguments resulting in the following hypotheses: (a) The family point of view emerges from collaborative dialogue, which helps develop agreement to ethical norms; (b) the presence of ethical norms further helps cultivate family social capital; and (c) as a resource in a family business, family social capital is positively related to family firm performance. Using structural equation modeling, an exploratory test of 405 small family firms found support for all three hypotheses. The findings indicate a fully mediated relationship among collaborative dialogue, ethical norms, family social capital, and firm performance. The study not only highlights the importance of moral infrastructure in family firms but also helps clarify components of family social capital.
Article
Agency theory argues that shareholder interests require protection by separation of incumbency of rôles of board chair and CEO. Stewardship theory argues shareholder interests are maximised by shared incumbency of these rôles. Results of an empirical test fail to support agency theory and provide some support for stewardship theory.
Article
Governance of family firms differs from mainstream corporate governance in an important respect: Important owners, i.e., family members, may have multiple roles in the business. In this paper, we develop and test a model of family firm governance that incorporates both formal control and social control aspects of governance. Governance based on the formal control draws on agency theory, whereas the social control aspects draw on social theories of governance, addressing social capital embedded in relationships. Drawing on these theories, we examine the influence of different governance mechanisms on the quality of strategic decision making. The Family Business Governance Model is tested using survey data from 192 family firms in Finland. We use structural equation modeling in testing the empirical validity of the model. The empirical analysis largely supports our hypotheses on formal control and social control as well as their influences on the decision-making quality.
Article
The authors' analysis of 291 family business articles published in 30 management journals between 2001 and 2007 reports the contributions of individual scholars and academic institutions to family business research. To better understand the interrelationships among scholars who have contributed to family business research, a network analysis of coauthor relationships was conducted. The authors also provide a content analysis of the articles and offer suggestions for future research. By analyzing the who, where, and what of family business research, the reasons why the developmental trends have occurred and how the field's momentum can be maintained and directed toward productive ends become clearer.
Article
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore relationships between different governance configurations and firm survival. The objective is to describe the alternative mechanisms through which the owning family takes a stake in the governance of the firm. Design/methodology/approach – The governance systems of 116 family enterprises in Lebanon are examined. The study integrates family, ownership, leadership and the business itself constituting the four structural elements of a family firm's governance system. Then, the study tests four hypotheses whether the family, the ownership, the leadership and the business dimensions influence positively firm survival/longevity. The other hypotheses tested concern the advisory services and the legal form of the board, and how that might affect the survival/longevity of the family firm. Findings – This integrative view allows observation of interactions among the different structures, and the establishment of a coordinating governing structure. Hypotheses testing results show that family, leadership and business dimensions have an impact on the performance/survival of the firm, whereas the ownership dimension has no effect. Research limitations/implications – Limitations of this paper relate to the relatively small size of the sample, and the sampled firms are young and small according to international standards. The study also suffers from common method bias and external validity. Practical implications – The proposed framework allows the establishment of a governance structure, for control and co-ordination. Ownership should be integrally separated from the other dimensions in the governance of a family firm to be able to achieve fairly good performance and ensure the survival and longevity of the firm. Originality/value – No other studies have been conducted on Lebanon. Moreover, the study integrates the four governance mechanisms developed by Klein which was not done previously.