ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Internationally, shortages in the nursing workforce, escalating patient demands, and financial constraints within the health system have led to the growth of unlicensed nursing support workers. Recently, in relation to the largest publicly funded health system (National Health Service), it was reported that extensive substitution of registered nurses with unskilled nursing support workers resulted in inadequate patient care, increased morbidity and mortality rates, and negative nurse outcomes. We argue that it is timely to consider regulation of nursing support workers with their role and scope of practice clearly defined. Further, the addition of these workers in a complementary model of care (rather than substitutive model) should also be explored in future research, in terms of impact on patient and nurse outcomes.
Article
The Use of Unregulated Staff: Time for
Regulation?
Christine M. Duffield, PhD, MHP, BScN, RN, FACN, FACHSM,
FAAN
1,2,3
, Di E. Twigg, PhD, MBA, BSc(Hons), RN, RM, FACN,
FACHSM
2,3
, Judith D. Pugh, PhD, MEd, PGradDipCurricEdTech,
RN
4
, Gemma Evans, RN, BSc(Hons)
2
, Sofia Dimitrelis, MPhil,
MPharm, BMedSci
1
, and Michael A. Roche, PhD, RN, MHSc, BScN,
DipAppScN
1
Abstract
Internationally, shortages in the nursing workforce, escalating patient demands, and financial constraints within the health
system have led to the growth of unlicensed nursing support workers. Recently, in relation to the largest publicly funded
health system (National Health Service), it was reported that extensive substitution of registered nurses with unskilled
nursing support workers resulted in inadequate patient care, increased morbidity and mortality rates, and negative nurse
outcomes. We argue that it is timely to consider regulation of nursing support workers with their role and scope of practice
clearly defined. Further, the addition of these workers in a complementary model of care (rather than substitutive model)
should also be explored in future research, in terms of impact on patient and nurse outcomes.
Keywords
nursing support worker, registered nurse, regulation, skill mix, scope of practice, patient outcomes
Introduction and Background
Poor nursing care leading to patients’ death and disabil-
ity has forced several countries to conduct inquiries into
their hospital systems. The most recent and perhaps the
most significant, because of the scale of deliberations,
occurred in 2013 in the National Health Service (NHS)
England, within the largest publicly funded health ser-
vice worldwide. The Mid Staffordshire Hospital Inquiry
investigated avoidable deaths that occurred between
January 2005 and March 2009 and was damning about
the poor quality of nursing care (Francis, 2010). The
findings included, but were not limited to, failures in
administering prescribed medications and inadequate
completion of nursing records, medical rounds, and nur-
sing handovers (Francis, 2013). Although, surprisingly,
the inquiry was unable to ascertain the number of nurses
employed, media reports indicated that there was exten-
sive substitution of registered nurses (RNs) with unli-
censed nursing support workers, which at times
reached levels of 50% of caregivers (Francis, 2013).
This was despite recommendations from earlier inquiries
(2007–2008) in the same Trust that the skill mix of 40:60
skilled (qualified) nurses to unskilled (nursing support
workers) be reversed to 60:40. This echoed an issue iden-
tified in earlier studies, where a reduction in nursing
1
Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of
Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
2
Clinical Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, School of Nursing and
Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Perth, WA, Australia
3
Centre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands,
Perth, WA, Australia
4
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup,
Perth, WA, Australia
Corresponding Author:
Christine M. Duffield, PhD, MHP, BScN, RN, FACN, FACHSM, FAAN,
Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of
Technology, Sydney: Health (CB10.07.208), PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW
2007, Australia.
Email: Christine.Duffield@uts.edu.au
Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice
2014, Vol. 15(1–2) 42–48
!The Author(s) 2014
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1527154414529337
ppn.sagepub.com
by guest on January 14, 2016ppn.sagepub.comDownloaded from
teamwork and the quality of care was associated with a
high proportion of nursing support workers in the work-
force (Spilsbury & Meyer, 2005). Indeed, lean skill mix (a
high percentage of unskilled workers) has been linked to
numerous negative patient outcomes (Kane, Shamliyan,
Mueller, Duval, & Wilt, 2007; Needleman et al., 2011;
Roche, Duffield, Aisbett, Diers, & Stasa, 2012; Twigg,
Duffield, Bremner, Rapley, & Finn, 2012). In view of this
research and other findings, it is timely to consider the
current state of nursing support worker employment, the
role and scope of practice of nursing support workers,
and the impact on patients and nurses, with a view to
regulation of these workers.
Definition
There are many titles used to refer to unregulated nur-
sing workers, which leads to confusing terminology: unli-
censed assistive personnel (United States); health care
assistants (United Kingdom and Australia); personal
care attendants (Australia); auxiliaries or auxiliary
nurses; patient care assistants, birth assistants, and psy-
chiatric aides; and assistants in nursing (Australia).
Other titles found in the literature include medical assist-
ant, patient care technician, care extender, nurse aide,
nurse tech, nursing orderlies, and attendants. The
International Standard Classification of Occupations
(ISCO 2008) categorizes all these unlicensed workers
under the occupation title of “Patient Care Workers in
Health Services” (International Labour Organization,
2012). The generic title “nursing support workers” will
be used throughout this article.
Nursing Support Worker Employment
The employment of nursing support workers has been
increasing over the past few years. Two significant fac-
tors driving this growth are nursing shortages and the
increased costs of care (Gillen & Graffin, 2010; Graham
& Duffield, 2010; Heath, 2002; Sibbald, Shen, &
McBride, 2004). In the United States, nursing assistants
comprise an estimated 24.7% (593,490) of the more than
2.4 million paraprofessionals (Squillace, Remsburg,
Bercovitz, Rosenoff, & Branden, 2007) and close to
72% (1.45 million) of the direct care nursing home work-
force in 2006 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2008). These
figures are mirrored in other countries. For example,
nursing support workers represent approximately 24%
of the entire UK NHS workforce with roughly 332,000
support staff (Department of Health, 2013). In England
alone, the figure is approximately 40%, with 669,953
staff registered with the Nursing and Midwifery
Council (Buchan & Seccombe, 2012) and 286,000 assist-
ant staff employed (NHS Information Centre Workforce
and Facilities Team, 2009); in Australia, it is 25% with
257,200 RNs and 64,600 nursing support workers
(Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS], 2013;
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2008).
Internationally, nursing shortages are well docu-
mented. Despite some slowing of the exit rate following
the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2007–2008, RN
shortages persist in many countries. For example, in
the United States, shortages are predicted to continue
but have been revised down from more than 1 million
nurses by 2020 to 260,000 by 2025 (Littlejohn, Campbell,
Collins-McNeil, & Khayile, 2012). In the United
Kingdom, a shortage of 42,807 (12.2%) is predicted in
2021/2022 (Buchan & Seccombe, 2012); in Australia,
109,000 (27%) by 2025 (Health Workforce Australia,
2012). Shortages in the regulated nursing workforce
lead inevitably to the increased use of nursing support
workers, particularly as the costs of health care continue
to rise (Keeney, Hasson, McKenna, & Gillen, 2005;
Marshall, 2006). In the United States, 17.6% of the
GDP is now directed toward health, the highest of any
developed country (Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development [OECD], 2012). Compared
with the United Kingdom, which has the largest publicly
funded health service, this rate is 9.6% and in Australia
(also a publicly funded system) 9.1% of GDP (OECD,
2012). The salary cost of a nursing support worker
ranges from 40% to 80% of an RN salary: roughly
37% in the United States (Bureau of Labor Statistics,
2013), 63% in the United Kingdom (National Health
Service Careers, 2013), and between 55% and 77% in
Australia (ABS, 2013; ACT Health, 2011). It is under-
standable that the employment of nursing support work-
ers has increased over the years.
Role and Scope of Practice
The role of nursing support workers has also changed
over time. In the 1980s, they performed ancillary, non-
nursing work (McKenna, Hasson, & Keeney, 2004), but
more recently their role has extended to undertaking
activities previously provided by licensed workers
(Australian Nursing Federation, 2008; Maben &
Griffiths, 2008), leading to greater concern about their
increasing role in patient care. Activities in which they
may be involved include bathing and dressing, feeding,
helping people to mobilize, toileting, bed making, gener-
ally assisting with patients’ overall comfort, and moni-
toring patients’ conditions (Bureau of Labor Statistics,
2013; National Health Service Careers, 2006). More
importantly, some nursing support workers record clin-
ical observations, including blood pressure, temperature,
and fluid balance; collect specimens; monitor blood glu-
cose; perform venepuncture and remove intravenous
cannulae; conduct simple wound cleansing and dressings;
and perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Bureau of
Duffield et al. 43
by guest on January 14, 2016ppn.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Labor Statistics, 2013; NSW Department of Health,
2010). There is a growing debate around whether nursing
support workers have the requisite knowledge, training,
and support to undertake an increasing range of tasks
safely. Training, which usually permits them to work
according to protocols (Rimmer & Hand, 2010), varies
from no training required through to a program that
lasts anywhere between 6 days and 6 weeks (Keeney
et al., 2005). There is a general concern about the lack
of a consistent approach to educational preparation,
scope of practice, and regulation (Francis, 2013;
Lintern, 2012; Sprinks, 2012; Willis, 2012). Regulation
would provide greater role clarity for nursing support
workers and other health care professionals, protect
the public from unsafe practices, and protect individual
support staff members from working beyond their scope
of practice (Storey, 2007).
Implications of Using Nursing
Support Workers
Introducing nursing support workers to a ward or unit
can be approached in one of two ways, either of which
can potentially change the mix of staff, approach to care
on a ward/unit, and impact on patients and staff. The
first is a substitutive model of nurse staffing, whereby
regulated staff (RNs) are replaced by unregulated nursing
support workers. This ultimately dilutes the skill mix
with fewer hours of care provided to patients by regu-
lated nursing staff (Blegen, Vaughn, & Vojir, 2008;
Roche et al., 2012). The second model is a supportive
or complementary model, whereby unregulated nursing
support workers are added to ward staffing. In this
model, the total number of hours of patient care pro-
vided increases, and the number of hours provided by
RNs is maintained (Carrigan, 2009; Roche et al., 2012).
Both methods have implications for the way patients are
assigned to caregivers and the work caregivers may then
undertake. Duffield, Roche, Diers, Catling-Paull, and
Blay (2010) found task assignment was used with a
poorer skill mix (fewer RNs) and when staff were
unfamiliar with the ward and patients. Patient allocation
was used when staffing included more RNs, more RNs
with degrees, and more expert nurses. Task assignment
can lead to issues with continuity of care because work is
divided into tasks and different staff members undertake
different tasks for the same patients. Usually, the RN
addresses more complex tasks, whereas lesser skilled
staff (nursing support workers) undertake more routine
tasks (Duffield et al., 2010).
There is growing concern that to meet current health
demands, the scope of nursing activities in which nursing
support workers are involved is expanding at a rate that
could potentially impact patient safety (Holloway &
McConigley, 2009), RN workload, and team efficiency.
One of the most significant and well-researched issues
related to their use is the impact on patient outcomes
(morbidity and mortality), particularly in a substitution
model. A number of large studies internationally have
found that a decreased use of RNs and an increased
use of nursing support workers result in high mortality
and morbidity rates and greater adverse patient out-
comes (Duffield et al., 2011; Kane et al., 2007;
Needleman et al., 2011; Roche et al., 2012). The state
of this body of work and science has now reached the
point where systematic reviews have been conducted. In
the first of these, Lang, Hodge, Olson, Romano, and
Kravitz (2004) reviewed 43 studies concluding a richer
nurse skill mix had a probable relationship with reduced
failure to rescue rates among surgical patients, and to
lower inpatient mortality rates and length of hospital
stay for medical patients. More recent studies link
reduced RN staffing with increased hospital-acquired
pneumonia, unplanned extubation, cardiac arrest, and
failure to rescue in surgical patients; longer length of
stay in intensive care units and surgical patients (Kane
et al., 2007); and increased mortality rates, between 2%
and 7% higher (Needleman et al., 2011). Failure to
rescue has been linked to nursing surveillance (Clarke
& Aiken, 2003; Kelly & Vincent, 2011), and RNs are
best qualified and able to accurately detect problems
and intervene in a timely and effective fashion (Clarke
& Aiken, 2003; Kelly & Vincent, 2011; Needleman,
Buerhaus, Stewart, Zelevinsky, & Mattke, 2006;
Tourangeau et al., 2007). Indeed, recent evidence sug-
gests that patient outcomes are even better where there
is a higher proportion of baccalaureate-prepared nurses
providing care (Aiken et al., 2011; Tourangeau et al.,
2007).
A change to unit staffing that includes the use of nur-
sing support workers also impacts on nurses with whom
they work (Marshall, 2006; Spilsbury et al., 2011). A
substitutive model of staffing that reduces RN hours of
care and increases those provided by nursing support
workers is likely to add to RN workload (Moyle,
Skinner, Rowe, & Gork, 2003), adds to the licensed
nurse’s responsibilities for ensuring patient safety
(Marshall, 2006), and leads to more interventions left
undone, poorer job satisfaction, reduced staff retention
(Aiken et al., 2001), higher rates of burnout (Leiter &
Laschinger, 2006), and increased costs linked to more
overtime claimed by RNs (Aiken, Clarke, Sloane, &
Sochalski, 2001; O’Brien-Pallas, Thomson, Alksnis, &
Bruce, 2001). In addition, RNs may spend less time
delivering bedside care, which can impact on their rela-
tionship with patients (Spilsbury & Meyer, 2005). There
is concern that when nursing support workers perform
aspects of patient care that have long been the province
of RNs, the lines and channels of accountability blur,
particularly if the role of the support worker is unclear
44 Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice 15(1–2)
by guest on January 14, 2016ppn.sagepub.comDownloaded from
(Castledine, 2004; Maben & Griffiths, 2008; Spilsbury
et al., 2011).
Researchers have also found that the expanding role
for nursing support workers can impact team efficiency
and patient care delivery. Feelings of role ambiguity and
role conflict from nurses toward support workers may
impede the functioning of the team (Keeney et al., 2005;
Spilsbury et al., 2011) and potentially increase the
responsibilities of RNs (Marshall, 2006). There is risk
of either an underutilization of support workers, irre-
spective of their skills, knowledge, or experience, or dele-
gation of tasks to support workers outside their
prescribed scope of practice, often with no RN supervi-
sion (Spilsbury & Meyer, 2005). Although RNs consider
themselves professionally accountable for the patient
care that they delegate to nursing support workers
(Alcorn & Topping, 2009; Marshall, 2006), many believe
that nursing support workers should also be accountable
for the care they deliver and, therefore, registered
with a professional, statutory, and regulatory body
(Alcorn & Topping, 2009). In addition, RNs are often
poorly prepared in the delegation, supervision, and
assessment of the competence of support workers
(Alcorn & Topping, 2009).
In contrast to the substitutive model, introducing nur-
sing support workers using a complementary staffing
model has been shown to have positive effects. Patient
rounding by RNs and nursing support workers, where
scheduled visits are made to patients in hospital rooms to
address immediate patient needs, has been associated
with positive patient outcomes and improved patient
safety (Blakely, Kroth, & Gregson, 2011), reduced
patient falls (Woodard, 2009), reduced use of the call
bell (Woodard, 2009), fewer work interruptions
(Shepard, 2013), consistency and continuity of patient
care, and improved patient satisfaction (Meade,
Bursell, & Ketelsen, 2006).
Need for Regulation
As nursing support workers represent a significant and
growing proportion of the health workforce, it is not
surprising that internationally the call for regulation
has been escalating (Storey, 2007). However, regulating
a new group of health workers is not a simple task. A
number of factors need to be considered including the
model of regulation to employ (e.g., voluntary vs. com-
pulsory, employer-led vs. statutory; Royal College of
Nursing, 2012; Storey, 2007), the cost to nursing support
workers who may earn significantly less money to nurses
(“How should HCA’s be regulated,” 2008), and deciding
which regulatory body is most suitable in overseeing this
group of workers (Storey, 2007).
Regulation of some categories of these workers cur-
rently exists. A number of U.S. states and territories
have primarily state-defined regulations or guidelines
for RN delegation, supervision, and assignment of nur-
sing support workers (i.e., unlicensed assistive person-
nel) in acute care hospitals along with mechanisms for
reporting their inappropriate use (Thomas, Barter, &
McLaughlin, 2000). Nonetheless, the scope of practice
of these workers varies from one jurisdiction to
another, and there are no standards for education and
training pertaining to them working in acute care U.S.
hospitals (Thomas et al., 2000). By comparison, the
United Kingdom has standardized, national vocational
training and duties for nursing support workers desig-
nated health care assistants (Thomas et al., 2000).
However, the Nursing and Midwifery Council does
not support mandatory regulation of health care assist-
ants; instead, it favors the development of delegation
standards for RNs and midwives and enhanced compe-
tency-based training for nursing support workers
(Commons Health Committee, 2012). Australia has
yet to mandate national, standardized vocational edu-
cation and training for nursing support workers who
can acquire skills through various pathways including
vocational training, informal training, and undergradu-
ate nursing programs (Algoso & Peters, 2012). The
onus currently is on employers in Australia to define
the essential functions, duties, and requisite competen-
cies of nursing support workers and on RNs to appro-
priately delegate, supervise, and assign work.
Continuing with the status quo—lack of regula-
tion—places the public, regulated nurses, and nursing
support workers at risk (Storey, 2007). Regulation
would provide consistency and perhaps greater account-
ability for nursing support workers.
Conclusion
Shortages in the nursing workforce and continuing
financial constraints are impacting the staffing deci-
sions of managers where supply and skill mix
become important considerations. However, it is unli-
kely that the escalating patient demands can be met
entirely by a workforce comprising RNs, leading to
the inevitable growth in employment of nursing sup-
port workers. The findings of inadequate nursing
care in the NHS are a signal to all countries that
changes in the composition of the health workforce
are underway with worrying consequences for
patients. For their protection, regulation of nursing
support workers must be given serious consideration.
More importantly, further research is required to
determine the positive impact that the addition of
nursing support workers (using a complementary
model) might have on patients and staff and
models of staff integration, which could possibly
maximize their use.
Duffield et al. 45
by guest on January 14, 2016ppn.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with
respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support
for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article:
This research work is supported by Australian Research
Council Linkage Grant (LP110200271).
References
ACT Health. (2011). ACT Public Service Nursing and
Midwifery enterprise agreement 2011–2013 (pp. 1–166).
ACT: Calvary Health Care. Retrieved from http://
www.jobs.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/530033/
Nursing-Midwifery-Agreement.pdf
Aiken, L. H., Cimiotti, J. P., Sloane, D. M., Smith, H. L.,
Flynn, L., & Neff, D. F. (2011). Effects of nurse staffing
and nurse education on patient deaths in hospitals with dif-
ferent nurse work environments. Medical Care,49(12),
1047–1053.
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., & Sochalski, J. A.
(2001). Cause for concern: Nurses’ reports of hospital care
in five countries. LDI Issue Brief,6(8), 1–4.
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J. A.,
Busse, R., Clarke, H., ... Shamian, J. (2001). Nurses’
reports on hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs,
20(3), 43–53.
Alcorn, J., & Topping, A. E. (2009). Registered nurses’ atti-
tudes towards the role of the healthcare assistant. Nursing
Standard,23(42), 39–45.
Algoso, M., & Peters, K. (2012). The experiences of under-
graduate Assistants in Nursing (AIN). Nurse Education
Today,32(3), 197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.002.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Australian social trends,
April 2013: Doctors and nurses. Canberra, ACT: Author.
Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.
nsf/Lookup/4102.0MainþFeatures20Aprilþ2013#p3
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2008). Australia’s
health 2008 (Cat. no. AUS 99). Canberra, ACT: Author.
Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/aus/
ah08/ah08.pdf
Australian Nursing Federation. (2008). ANF position state-
ment: Licensing of assistants in nursing and personal care
assistants (However Titled). Canberra, ACT: Author.
Retrieved from http://www.anf.org.au/pdf/policies/PS_
Licensing_AINS.pdf
Blakely, D., Kroth, M., & Gregson, J. (2011). The impact of
nurse rounding on patient satisfaction in a medical-surgical
hospital unit. MEDSURG Nursing,20(6), 327–332.
Blegen, M. A., Vaughn, T., & Vojir, C. P. (2008). Nurse staff-
ing levels: Impact of organisational characteristics and regis-
tered nurse supply. Health Services Research,43(1 Pt. 1),
154–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00749.x.
Buchan, J., & Seccombe, I. (2012). Overstretched. Under-
resourced. The UK nursing labour market review 2012
(p. 45). London, England: Royal College of Nursing.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008). National industry occupation
employment matrix: 2006–2016. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Labor.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Occupational outlook hand-
book 2012–13: Nursing aides, orderlies, and attendants.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labour. Retrieved
from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/nursing-assistants.htm
Carrigan, C. (2009). Mixing it up: The future of assistants in
nursing. Australian Nursing Journal,17(4), 24–27.
Castledine, G. (2004). The role of the healthcare assistant in
nursing. British Journal of Nursing,13(19), 1161.
Clarke, S. P., & Aiken, L. H. (2003). Failure to rescue: Needless
deaths are prime examples of the need for more nurses at the
bedside. AJN: The American Journal of Nursing,103(1),
42–47.
Commons Health Committee. (2012). Health Committee 15th
report—Annual accountability hearings: Responses and fur-
ther issues. Appendix 2: Nursing and Midwifery Council’s
response. London, England: UK Parliament. Retrieved
from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/
cmselect/cmhealth/1699/169907.htm
Department of Health (2013). The Cavendish review: Review of
healthcare assistants and support workers in NHS and social
care. London, England: Author. Retrieved from www.gov.
uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/
file/212732/Cavendish_Review_ACCESSIBLE_-_FINAL_
VERSION_16-7-13.pdf
Duffield, C., Diers, D., O’Brien-Pallas, L., Aisbett, C., Roche,
M., King, M., ... Aisbett, K. (2011). Nursing staffing, nur-
sing workload, the work environment and patient outcomes.
Applied Nursing Research,24(4), 244–255.
Duffield, C., Roche, M., Diers, D., Catling-Paull, C., & Blay,
N. (2010). Staffing, skill mix and the model of care. Journal
of Clinical Nursing,19(15–16), 2242–2251.
Francis, R. (2010). Independent inquiry into care provided by
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005–
March 2009. The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust
Inquiry (vol. 1, p. 455). London, England: The Stationery
Office.
Francis, R. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS
Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. The Mid Staffordshire
NHS Foundation Trust Inquiry (vol. 1–3, p. 1776).
London, England: The Stationery Office.
Gillen, P., & Graffin, S. (2010). Nursing delegation in the
United Kingdom. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,
15(2). doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No02Man06.
Graham, E. M., & Duffield, C. (2010). An ageing nursing
workforce. Australian Health Review,34(1), 44–48.
Health Workforce Australia. (2012). Health workforce 2025:
Doctors, nurses and midwives (Vol.1). Adelaide, South
Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.hwa.gov.
au/sites/uploads/health-workforce-2025-volume-1.pdf
Heath, P. (2002). National review of nursing education 2002:
Our duty of care. Canberra, ACT: Nursing Education
Review Secretariat. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.
au/archive/highered/nursing/pubs/duty_of_care/duty_of_
care.pdf
Holloway, K., & McConigley, R. (2009). Descriptive, explora-
tory study of the role of nursing assistants in Australian
46 Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice 15(1–2)
by guest on January 14, 2016ppn.sagepub.comDownloaded from
residential aged care facilities: The example of pain manage-
ment. Australasian Journal on Ageing,28(2), 70–74.
How should HCA’s be regulated. (2008). Nursing Times.
Retrieved from http://www.nursingtimes.net/whats-new-in-
nursing/unison/how-should-hcas-be-regulated/5000407.
article
International Labour Organization. (2012). International stand-
ard classification of occupations (ISCO-08). Geneva,
Switzerland: International Labour Office. Retrieved from
http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—
dcomm/—publ/documents/publication/wcms_172572.pdf
Kane, R. L., Shamliyan, T. A., Mueller, C., Duval, S., & Wilt,
T. J. (2007). The association of registered nurse staffing
levels and patient outcomes: Systematic review and meta-
analysis. Medical Care,45(12), 1195–1204.
Keeney, S., Hasson, F., McKenna, H., & Gillen, P. (2005).
Nurses’, midwives’ and patients’ perceptions of trained
health care assistants. Journal of Advanced Nursing,50(4),
345–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03399.x.
Kelly, L., & Vincent, D. (2011). The dimensions of nursing
surveillance: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced
Nursing,67(3), 652–661.
Lang, T. A., Hodge, M., Olson, V., Romano, P. S., & Kravitz,
R. L. (2004). Nurse-patient ratios: A systematic review on
the effects of nurse staffing on patient, nurse employee,
and hospital outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration,
34(7–8), 326–337.
Leiter, M. P., & Laschinger, H. K. S. (2006). Relationships of
work and practice environment to professional burnout:
Testing a causal model. Nursing Research,55(2), 137–146.
Lintern, S. (2012). Willis commission backs HCA regulation
and graduate nursing. Nursing Times,108(45), 3.
Littlejohn, L., Campbell, J., Collins-McNeil, J., & Khayile, T.
(2012). Nursing shortage: A comparative analysis.
International Journal of Nursing Practice,1(1), 22–27.
Maben, J., & Griffiths, P. (2008). Nurses in society: Starting the
debate (p. 32). London, England: National Nursing
Research Unit, King’s College London.
Marshall, M. (2006). The use of unlicensed personnel: Their
impact upon professional nurses, patients and the manage-
ment of nursing services. Nursing Monograph, 4–8.
McKenna, H. P., Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2004).
Patient safety and quality of care: The role of the health
care assistant. Journal of Nursing Management,12(6),
452–459.
Meade, C. M., Bursell, A. L., & Ketelsen, L. (2006). Effects of
nursing rounds: On patients’ call light use, satisfaction, and
safety. AJN: The American Journal of Nursing,106(9),
58–70.
Moyle, W., Skinner, J., Rowe, G., & Gork, C. (2003). Views of
job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in Australian long-term
care. Journal of Clinical Nursing,12(2), 168–176.
National Health Service Careers. (2006). Healthcare assistants/
auxiliary nurses. Retrieved from http://www.nhscareers.
nhs.uk/details/Default.aspx?Id¼485
National Health Service Careers. (2013). Pay for nurses.
Retrieved from http://www.nhscareers.nhs.uk/explore-by-
career/nursing/pay-for-nurses/
Needleman, J., Buerhaus, P., Pankratz, V. S., Leibson, C. L.,
Stevens, S. R., & Harris, M. (2011). Nurse staffing and
inpatient hospital mortality. New England Journal of
Medicine,364(11), 1037–1045.
Needleman, J., Buerhaus, P., Stewart, M., Zelevinsky, K., &
Mattke, S. (2006). Nurse staffing in hospitals: Is there a
business case for quality? Health Affairs (Project Hope),
25(1), 204–211. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.204.
NHS Information Centre Workforce and Facilities Team.
(2009). NHS hospital and community health services non-
medical staff (England) 1998–2008. London, England: The
Health and Social Care Information Centre.
NSW Department of Health. (2010). Assistants in nursing work-
ing in the acute care environment: Health service implemen-
tation package. NSW: Author. Retrieved from http://
www0.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2010/ain_acute_care.html
O’Brien-Pallas, L., Thomson, D., Alksnis, C., & Bruce, S.
(2001). The economic impact of nurse staffing decisions:
Time to turn down another road? Hospital Quarterly,4(3),
42–50.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
(2012). How does the United States compare. Retrieved
from http://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/BriefingNote
USA2012.pdf
Rimmer, D., & Hand, T. (2010). Ask the board: HCA or AP:
What’s the difference? British Journal of Healthcare
Assistants,4(2), 97.
Roche, M., Duffield, C., Aisbett, C., Diers, D., & Stasa, H.
(2012). Nursing work directions in Australia: Does evidence
drive the policy? Collegian,19(4), 231–238. doi: 10.1016/
j.colegn.2012.03.006.
Royal College of Nursing. (2012). RCN policy and international
department—RCN nursing department policy briefing 40/12:
The weakness of voluntary regulation for health care support
workers. Retrieved from http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/
assets/pdf_file/0008/493874/40.12_Support_worker_
regulation_FINAL.pdf
Shepard, L. H. (2013). Stop going in circles! Break the barriers
to hourly rounding. Nursing Management,44(2), 13–15. doi:
10.1097/01.NUMA.0000426147.98903.ae.
Sibbald, B., Shen, J., & McBride, A. (2004). Changing the skill-
mix of the health care workforce. Journal of Health Services
Research & Policy,9(Suppl. 1): 28–38.
Spilsbury, K., Adamson, J., Atkin, K., Bloor, K., Carr-Hill, R.,
McCaughan, D., ... Wakefield, A. (2011). Challenges and
opportunities associated with the introduction of assistant
practitioners supporting the work of registered nurses in
NHS acute hospital trusts in England. Journal of Health
Services Research & Policy,16(1), 50–56.
Spilsbury, K., & Meyer, J. (2005). Making claims on nursing
work: Exploring the work of healthcare assistants and the
implications for registered nurses’ roles. Journal of Research
in Nursing,10(1), 65–83. doi: 10.1177/136140960501000104.
Sprinks, J. (2012). Regulator jettisons HCA work to concen-
trate on fitness to practise. Nursing Standard,26(28), 11.
Squillace, M. R., Remsburg, R. E., Bercovitz, A., Rosenoff, E.,
& Branden, L. (2007). An introduction to the National
Nursing Assistant Survey. Vital Health Statistics. Series 1,
Programs and Collection Procedures,44, 1–54.
Storey, L. (2007). Regulation of healthcare assistants: An
ongoing debate. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants,
1(1), 15–17.
Duffield et al. 47
by guest on January 14, 2016ppn.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Thomas, S. A., Barter, M., & McLaughlin, F. E. (2000). State
and territorial boards of nursing approaches to the use of
unlicensed assistive personnel. JONA’S Healthcare Law,
Ethics, and Regulation,2(1), 13–21.
Tourangeau, A. E., Doran, D. M., Hall, L. M., O’Brien Pallas,
L., Pringle, D., Tu, J. V., ... Cranley, L. A. (2007). Impact
of hospital nursing care on 30-day mortality for acute med-
ical patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing,57(1), 32–44.
Twigg, D., Duffield, C., Bremner, A., Rapley, P., & Finn, J.
(2012). Impact of skill mix variations on patient outcomes
following implementation of nursing hours per patient day
staffing: A retrospective study. Journal of Advanced Nursing,
68(12), 2710–2718.
Willis, G. (2012). It’s unacceptable that support workers are
not regulated. Nursing Times,108(47), 7.
Woodard, J. L. (2009). Effects of rounding on patient satisfac-
tion and patient safety on a medical-surgical unit. Clinical
Nurse Specialist,23(4), 200–206.
Author Biographies
Christine M. Duffield, PhD, MHP, BScN, RN, FACN,
FACHSM, FAAN, is Director of the Centre for Health
Services Management in the Faculty of Health,
University of Technology, Sydney (UTS). She is a pro-
fessor of nursing and health services management at
UTS and Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western
Australia. Professor Duffield has worked on many nur-
sing workforce projects nationally and internationally.
Di E. Twigg, PhD, MBA, BSc(Hons), RN, RM, FACN,
FACHSM, is a professor of nursing and Head of School
in the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Edith Cowan
University, Perth, Western Australia. She has had over
15 years’ experience in senior executive roles, primarily
as Executive Director of Nursing Services at Sir Charles
Gairdner Hospital. During this time, she led Sir Charles
Gairdner Hospital to become a Magnet designated hos-
pital. Professor Twigg has utilized her extensive leader-
ship experience in the development of research interests,
focusing on nursing workforce, patient outcomes, and
quality care.
Judith D. Pugh, PhD, MEd, PGradDipCurricEdTech,
RN, is a research associate at Edith Cowan University,
School of Nursing and Midwifery. She has extensive
experience as a registered and clinical nurse in intensive
care units across states in Australia. Dr Pugh has also
undertaken research projects in a variety of health-
related fields including nursing workforce and health ser-
vices research.
Gemma Evans, RN, BSc(Hons), is currently working at
Edith Cowan University as a research assistant in the
School of Nursing and Midwifery. Her research interests
include nursing workforce and retention. She has also
published work on registered nurse perceptions on nur-
sing research and the role of nurses in national safety and
quality health service standards.
Sofia Dimitrelis, MPhil, MPharm, BMedSci, works with
the Centre for Health Services Management in the
Faculty of Health at the University of Technology,
Sydney. In her role, she coordinates projects on nursing
workforce, turnover, and skill mix. Sofia is also a regis-
tered pharmacist with experience in clinical, research and
educational settings.
Michael A. Roche, PhD, RN, MHSc, BScN,
DipAppScN, is a senior lecturer at the Centre for
Health Services Management in the Faculty of Health,
University of Technology, Sydney. Dr Roche is a mental
health nurse with experience in clinical, educational,
information technology, and management positions in
the NSW public health system. He has been involved
in a number of research projects, investigating links
between the practice environment and outcomes for
nurses, patients, and the health system.
48 Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice 15(1–2)
by guest on January 14, 2016ppn.sagepub.comDownloaded from
... The latter category, which is not exclusive to students but to which they can and do apply, includes a raft of 'unregulated' healthcare roles with a host of different titles, including (health) assistants in nursing (AIN), personal care attendants, healthcare assistants, birth assistants, psychiatric aids, auxiliary nurses and aged care workers, to name but a few (Blay & Roche, 2020;Duffield et al., 2014;Lokmic-Tomkins, Khor, Matthews, Martin, & McGillion, 2021;Australian College of Nursing, 2019a;2019b). This heterogeneous assortment of roles provides ancillary services across a wide range of healthcare settings, including (but not limited to) public and private hospitals, day procedure settings, mental health inpatient settings, residential aged care and disability services and privately contracted in-home care (ACN, 2019;Roche, Glover, Luo, Joyce, & Rossiter, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Undergraduate nursing and midwifery curricula in Australia are accredited according to the Australian Registered Nurse Standards for Practice and Midwife Standards for Practice. At the university level, all subjects are mapped to their relevant professional standards. Little is known about the intersection between the curricula and dedicated student in nursing (SIN) and student in midwifery (SIM) employment roles. Methods This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2019 over 5 months, surveyed nursing and midwifery students working in undergraduate student employment roles at major public and private hospitals in North Queensland (NQ), Australia, using a self-report survey developed by the authors. Findings Data collected from 68 respondents indicated that work undertaken by SIN/SIMs in the areas of knowledge development, skill development, building confidence, and socialisation was highly valued by those who work in these roles. The findings also demonstrated links between student knowledge and skill acquisition that occurs at university and their application within clinical environments. Conversely, participants reported no formal recognition by their university of the knowledge acquired and learning undertaken within the workplace whilst in a SIN/SIM role. Discussion The results of this study affirm the important integrative relationship between this work and student learning, whilst also demonstrating links to the achievement of professional standards, a requirement for all nursing and midwifery graduates. The absence of collaboration and connection between the university and clinical settings is of major concern given the long-standing attempts to reduce the intransigent ‘theory-practice gap’. Conclusion It is axiomatic that the work undertaken by nursing and midwifery undergraduates in dedicated clinical employment roles in NQ contributes in significant ways to student learning and professional development.
... There is a global shortage of medical personnel, and to reduce costs at medical facilities, there has been an increased focus on personnel who can assist with nursing tasks without the need for specific qualifications [1,3,7]. Some tasks of NAs are complex and require high-level skills and are the same as those of nurses [1]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the expectations of unit-level nurses from nursing assistants (NAs), frequency of individual NAs’ information-sharing behaviors with nurses, and the effect of NAs’ self-perceived roles on this relationship. NAs provide patient care along with nurses, and their information-sharing behaviors with nurses may be influenced by the expectations of the nurses. Methods Nurses and NAs from 104 integrated community care (sub- and postacute) units were included in this Japanese cross-sectional study conducted from July to September 2018. Nurses’ expectations from NAs and the NAs’ self-perceived roles and information-sharing frequency were measured. Multilevel mediation analysis was performed for NAs’ information-sharing behaviors, such as expressing, asking, providing linguistic responses, and providing feedback. Results Unit-level nurses’ expectations from NAs were associated with the frequency of NAs’ asking and responding behaviors with nurses (P < .05), mediated by the NAs’ self-perceived roles. The frequency of NAs’ expressing behaviors and feedback were also associated with their self-perceived roles (P < .001). Conclusions High expectations of unit-level nurses from NAs led to better perception by NAs of their roles and led to better information-sharing behaviors. Educating nurses on NAs’ roles may improve information-sharing between nurses and NAs that leads to safe and appropriate care to patients.
... Helsetjenesten i den vestlige verden omfattes av voldsomme endringer som følge av at befolkningen stadig blir eldre (World Health Organization, 2015). Økt sykelighet, sammensatte tilstander, utvikling i behandlingsmuligheter og teknologi har skapt større behov for tjenester, mens baerekraften utfordres av mangelen på helsepersonell til å utføre oppgavene (Duffield et al., 2014;Lovink et al., 2017). En omfordeling av oppgaver mellom ulike aktører og personell i helsevesenet er lansert som en løsning som kan bedre ressursutnyttelsen, øke fleksibiliteten og effektiviteten i tjenestene (Aiken et al., 2017;Helsedirektoratet, 2012;Kunnskapsdepartementet, 2012). ...
Book
Full-text available
En hurtigoversikt over forskningslitteratur Oppgaveglidning er et aktuelt fenomen i kommunale helse-og omsorgstjenester. Her belyses forekomst, involverte yrkes-grupper, typer oppgaver samt begrunnelser for og erfaringer med oppgaveglidning.
Article
Full-text available
Background Across international healthcare systems, healthcare assistant roles have proliferated, in part to decrease nursing costs and support workplace staffing. There is a lack of consensus about the professional title for healthcare assistants, and whether this group requires professional regulation. The variety of terms for healthcare assistants has resulted in confusion around their scope of practice and role within the healthcare team, which may influence patient care. Aim We aimed to identify the terminology used for healthcare assistants across English speaking countries and determine the international status of professional regulation of healthcare assistants. Method We conducted a deductive, structured search for healthcare assistant roles that were codified on English-language nursing regulator websites in each jurisdiction in Australia, New Zealand, USA, Canada, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. We assessed what terminology were used for healthcare assistant roles in each area, and whether they were regulated by a professional regulator, such as a college of nursing. Results Across 77 jurisdictions, we identified 37 different terms for healthcare assistants. The most frequent term was Certified Nurse Aid with 24 uses, and Certified Nursing Assistant with 13 uses. The majority of healthcare assistants are not professionally regulated. Only 12 jurisdictions have professional regulation programs for healthcare assistants, all in the USA. Conclusion There is an urgent need for international consensus about the nomenclature for healthcare assistants, so the healthcare assistant workforce can be supported, and their work evaluated via research studies. Regulators can consider how to engage with healthcare assistants and protect the public, as healthcare assistants provide an increasing proportion of patient care.
Article
Full-text available
Background A 15 million health workforce shortage is still experienced globally leading to a sub-optimal healthcare worker-to-population ratio in most countries. The use of low-skilled care assistants has been suggested as a cost-saving human resource for health strategy that can significantly reduce the risks of rationed, delayed, or missed care. However, the characterisation, role assignment, regulation, and clinical governance mechanisms for unlicensed assistive workforce remain unclear or inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to map and collate evidence of how care assistants are labelled, utilised, regulated, and managed in formal hospital settings as well as their impact on patient care. Methods We conducted a scoping review of literature from PUBMED, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Searches and eligibility screening were conducted using the Participants–Context–Concepts framework. Thematic content analysis guided the synthesis of the findings. Results 73 records from a total of 15 countries were included in the final full-text review and synthesis. A majority (78%) of these sources were from high-income countries. Many titles are used to describe care assistants, and these vary within and across countries. On ascribed roles, care assistants perform direct patient care, housekeeping, clerical and documentation, portering, patient flow management, ordering of laboratory tests, emergency response and first aid duties. Additional extended roles that require higher competency levels exist in the United States, Australia, and Canada. There is a mixture of both positive and negative sentiments on their impact on patient care or nurses’ perception and experiences. Clinical and organisational governance mechanisms vary substantially across the 15 countries. Licensure, regulatory mechanisms, and task-shifting policies are largely absent or not reported in these countries. Conclusions The nomenclature used to describe care assistants and the tasks they perform vary substantially within countries and across healthcare systems. There is, therefore, a need to review and update the international and national classification of occupations for clarity and more meaningful nomenclature for care assistants. In addition, the association between care assistants and care outcomes or nurses’ experience remains unclear. Furthermore, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on this topic from low- and middle-income countries.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Evidence has shown that throughout their undergraduate years, many nursing and midwifery students obtain paid employment in a wide variety of clinical and non-clinical positions. Across Australia, inconsistencies exist in the models of clinical employment available to these student groups. Previous Australian studies have described the employment of undergraduate nursing and midwifery students in regulated and unregulated clinical roles. No studies have reported on the various regulated roles available to both student nurses and midwives in Australia. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and synthesize evidence related to nursing and/or midwifery students employed in regulated and unregulated clinical roles in Australia. Methods This scoping review utilized published recommendations for data screening, abstraction, and synthesis. One of the authors, a librarian, undertook systematic searches in CINAHL Complete (1937–present), Emcare on Ovid (1995–present), Scopus (1969–present), and Ovid MEDLINE(R) (including Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations, 1946–present). The initial searches were completed in April 2019 and repeated in March 2021 and May 2022 to identify any new literature. Manual searching of reference lists in the included papers was also undertaken, together with selected organizational websites. The extracted data included the lead author, date, title, study design, study sample and location, and key findings. Results From the 53 items retrieved, 23 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. All items were published between 2011 and 2022. Only four of the studies focused upon student midwives. Undergraduate nursing and midwifery students in Australia obtain paid employment in a variety of regulated and unregulated clinical roles. Conclusion The literature reported here demonstrates that there are differing models, nomenclature, educational requirements, and pay scales in place for student employment in clinical roles across Australian states and territories.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Healthcare assistants working in hospice at home settings have a pivotal role in supporting people dying at home and their family caregivers. Some healthcare assistants are working alone in patients' homes, which magnifies some of the issues reported for those working closely with other team members. There is a dearth of evidence in terms of education, training and support needs for healthcare assistants when working alone. Aim: To explore the role of newly employed lone working healthcare assistants delivering palliative care in the community, and their support and educational needs. Design: Qualitative exploratory study using semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Healthcare assistants (n = 16) employed less than 12 months by a national non-profit hospice and palliative care provider located across the UK. Results: Analysis of interviews identified three main themes: (1) Healthcare assistants have a unique and complex role catering for holistic needs of patients and their family caregivers in the home environment; (2) preparation for the complex role requires focus on experiential learning and specific training to support holistic care provision; (3) lone workers experience loneliness and isolation and identify peer support as a key intervention to support their wellbeing. Conclusions: Given the complexities of their role within community palliative care teams, there are key learning points in relation to healthcare assistant preparation. Education and support networks should be prioritised to reduce isolation and support ongoing learning and development of newly employed healthcare assistants; all of which is vital to ensure safety and quality of care for the growing number of people they support in the community.
Article
Aim: To scope the international literature about registered nurses delegated models of care to unlicenced workers, identify gaps and reflect upon how the evidence relates to nursing in multiple contexts. Design: Scoping review of the peer reviewed literature from the year 2000 onwards, using the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Methods: The study searched the following databases in February 2022: CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, and SCOPUS, and included keywords, Boolean operators and subject headings relevant to registered nurses delegating the provision of care to unlicenced workers. Results: A total of 49 articles met the eligibility criteria for this study, and relevant data were extractedThree models of delegation were highlighted within the literature: direct, indirect and a mixture of both. The data highlighted that direct delegation mainly occurred in acute contexts, with delegation decreasing with increasing patient acuity and/or complexity but the threshold of when this would occur was not clear. There was one intervention study that measured patient outcomes which could aid in the determination of what is effective delegation. For studies that did report on it (n = 6), there were few examples of better patient outcomes in cases where care was delegated from registered nurses to unlicenced workers. Conclusions: The scoping review highlighted heterogeneity in practice areas and methods of delegation practice. A key gap in literature is the absence of studies focusing on patient outcomes, with a clear baseline to measure and identify effective delegation practices. Additionally, the legal and logistical implications presented in both direct and indirect delegation practices is not evident in the literature. Implications for the profession: Decisions related to delegation are often made at the service level and prescribed to those who work within the service, suggesting that models of indirect delegation are in fact not delegation at all, rather a re-distribution of nurses' work. Relevance to clinical practice: Delegation is a vital component of the scope of practice of registered nurses. This review has highlighted unique differences in delegation by practice context, where the proliferation of unlicensed workers in certain contexts places a vastly different professional and legal burden on the registered nurse.
Article
Background: Preregistration nursing students frequently seek employment as healthcare support workers (HCSWs). However, little is known about their experience of alternating between these two roles. Aim: To explore the experiences of preregistration nursing students working as healthcare support workers. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three preregistration nursing students working part-time as HCSWs in the NHS. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Findings: Analysis of the interview data produced the overarching theme of 'walking the tightrope'. The overarching theme contained four subthemes: 'preparing to get on the tightrope'; 'balancing on the tightrope'; 'having the stamina to stay on the tightrope'; and 'preparing to get off the tightrope'. Conclusion: Nursing students gained experience and confidence while working as HCSWs, but were challenged by the limitations and demands of the role.
Article
Background Healthcare organisations have been redesigning care delivery models in an attempt to extend, expand and supplement the registered nurse workforce by including more unregulated healthcare workers, such as the assistant-in-nursing. As the number of assistants-in-nursing grow it is essential that nurses have the requisite skills and knowledge to effectively delegate and supervise this growing workforce. Objective The aim of this research was to explore the factors that impact the nurse's decision to delegate to assistant-in-nursing in the acute care environment. Design This study used a mixed-method explanatory sequential design. The participants were RNs in an acute public hospital in Western Australia. The surveys completed by the registered nurses (n = 100) included their attitude to delegation, the risk management process undertaken prior to delegation and the tasks that they delegated to the assistants-in-nursing. The survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings from these data informed the questions for the semi structured interviews which formed the second phase of this research. Interviews with registered nurses (n = 12) were conducted, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results from both phases were triangulated to provide a richer understanding of the phenomena. Results Overall, approximately half have a ‘somewhat negative attitude’ (n = 45, 45%); and the other half have a ‘somewhat positive attitude’ (n = 48, 48%) towards delegation. Concerningly, many nurses do not complete a risk assessment prior to delegating to the assistant-in-nursing. This study identified a range of factors that impact a nurses' decision to delegate to the assistant-in-nursing including their level of experience, level of education pertaining to delegation, the assistants-in-nursing skills, knowledge and attributes, and the individual nurses' personality traits. Conclusions As demand and financial constraints on healthcare systems increase, governments and health care providers are needing to reconsider how to deliver effective, cost efficient healthcare in the acute care environment. As models of care evolve to include more unregulated workers it is essential that safe, effective delegation practices occur between registered nurses and the assistant-in-nursing.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: There is limited research on patient call light use as it pertains to effective patient-care management, patient safety, and patient satisfaction. Therefore, this study sought to determine the frequency of and reasons for patients' call light use, the effects of one-hour and two-hour nursing rounds on patients' use of the call light, and the effects of such rounding on patient satisfaction, as well as patient safety as measured by the rate of patient falls. Methods: A six-week nationwide study was performed using a quasi-experimental nonequivalent groups design; baseline data was taken during the first two weeks. Analyses were performed on data from 27 nursing units in 14 hospitals in which members of the nursing staff performed rounds either at one-hour or two-hour intervals using a specified protocol. Results: Specific nursing actions performed at set intervals were associated with statistically significant reduced patient use of the call light overall, as well as a reduction of patient falls and increased patient satisfaction. Conclusions: A protocol that incorporates specific actions into nursing rounds conducted either hourly or once every two hours can reduce the frequency of patients' call light use, increase their satisfaction with nursing care, and reduce falls. Based on these results, we suggest operational changes in hospitals, emphasizing nurse rounding on patients to achieve more effective patient-care management and improved patient satisfaction and safety.
Article
This article describes how registered nurses in the United Kingdom (UK) delegate some nursing activities to support workers who assist them in providing nursing care. The global shortage of qualified nurses and the ageing nursing population has resulted in a growing dependency on non-qualified personnel to provide certain aspects of patient care within the care setting. The authors begin this article by presenting the differing nursing staff roles in the UK along with the legal and professional aspect of delegation. Next they discuss the benefits, facilitators, and barriers. They conclude by describing the changes in role expectations, the variety of nursing settings in which delegation occurs, and nursing delegation challenges within the UK.
Article
The existing job satisfaction literature has tended towards an overemphasis on job satisfaction instruments. In the study reported here the views of 27 nurses and assistants-in-nursing, collected through focus group interviews, were examined to determine the factors that contribute to workplace satisfaction and dissatisfaction in long-term care of older people. Content analysis of focus group interview data revealed that job satisfaction was related to workplace flexibility, residents, working within a team environment and dedication to the service of optimal resident care. Dissatisfaction was linked to working with unskilled or inappropriately trained staff, laborious tasks such as documentation, staffing levels, tensions within role expectations and the increasing need to be available for overtime. In spite of different role expectations, long-term nursing home care is reported to be a very satisfying area in which to work. However, care managers need to put in place strategies for building improved job satisfaction and workplace incentives to encourage graduates to consider long-term care opportunities. Limitations of the study include the small number of participants, bias towards one organization and lack of generalizability of the results. However, the findings confirm many earlier job satisfaction studies and further support the need to consider these issues in relation to recruitment and retention in long-term care.
Article
This article describes how registered nurses in the United Kingdom (UK) delegate some nursing activities to support workers who assist them in providing nursing care. The global shortage of qualified nurses and the ageing nursing population has resulted in a growing dependency on non-qualified personnel to provide certain aspects of patient care within the care setting. The authors begin this article by presenting the differing nursing staff roles in the UK along with the legal and professional aspect of delegation. Next they discuss the benefits, facilitators, and barriers. They conclude by describing the changes in role expectations, the variety of nursing settings in which delegation occurs, and nursing delegation challenges within the UK.
Article
Objective: To determine whether the peer-reviewed literature supports specific, minimum nurse–patient ratios for acute care hospitals and whether nurse staffing is associated with patient, nurse employee, or hospital outcomes. Background: Hospital care may be compromised by forces that have increased patient acuity, reduced the ratio of caregivers to patients, and lowered the level of training of these caregivers. Methods: We systematically reviewed studies of the effects of nurse staffing on patient, nurse employee, and hospital outcomes published between 1980 and 2003 to determine whether they could guide the setting of minimum licensed nurse–patient ratios in acute care hospitals. Results: Of 2897 titles and abstracts of interest, 490 articles were retrieved, and 43 met the inclusion criteria. Although all adjusted for case mix and skill mix, only one recent study addressed minimum nurse staffing ratios. Patient outcomes were limited to in-hospital, adverse events. Evidence suggests that richer nurse staffing is associated with lower failure-to-rescue rates, lower inpatient mortality rates, and shorter hospital stays. Conclusion: The literature offers no support for specific, minimum nurse–patient ratios for acute care hospitals, especially in the absence of adjustments for skill and patient mix, although total nursing hours and skill mix do appear to affect some important patient outcomes.
Article
‘What's the difference between a healthcare assistant (HCA) and an assistant practitioner (AP)?
Article
The regulation of healthcare assistants (HCAs) is a topic which has caused widespread debate since the role has begun to develop. Although the general consensus is that HCAs should be regulated, the problem is deciding who should do the regulating. This article outlines the reasons why regulation is so important and examines the differences between various health care bodies which are preventing a decision from being made.