ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Glycemic Management after Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are recommended for use in antenatal mothers at risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks. One common side-effect of these drugs is their propensity to cause hyperglycemia. A PubMed search was made using terms 'steroid,' 'dexamethasone,' 'betamethasone' with diabetes/glucose. Relevant articles were extracted. In addition, important cross-reference articles were reviewed. This review, based upon this literature search, discusses the available evidence on effects on glycemic status as well as management strategies in women with pre-existing diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus, as well as normoglycemic women after ACS use in pregnancy.
Content may be subject to copyright.
North American Journal of Medical Sciences | February 2014 | Volume 6 | Issue 2 | 71
Review Article
Introduction
Glucocorticoids are drugs, which have multiple effects on
carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolism, as well as
other aspects of homeostasis. They are also potent anti-
inammatory and immunosuppressive molecules. One
common side-effect of these drugs is their propensity to
cause hyperglycemia. These drugs are used in pregnancy
to accelerate lung maturity in the preterm fetus.
Antenatal corticosteroids were rst recommended for
use in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus
Development Conference statement 1995.[1] Use of
glucocorticoids, i.e., dexamethasone or betamethasone,
in antenatal mothers at risk of preterm delivery,
prevents respiratory distress and lowers the risk of
hyaline membrane disease in their preterm infants.
Glucocorticoids increase alveolar surfactant, improve
pulmonary compliance, and expand maximal lung
volume in the fetus. This occurs due to induction of
protein synthesis in surfactant-producing type II cells
in the fetal lung.[2]
Rationale of Antenatal Corticosteroid
Treatment (ACS) in Diabetes
The need for ACS in threatened preterm pregnancies is
being felt in modern obstetric medicine. In women with
diabetes, this need is even more pronounced. Antenatal
women with diabetes are at higher risk of experiencing
various obstetric and medical complications. Fetal
lung maturity is delayed in pregnancies where
euglycemia is not achieved. These facts imply that
ACS may be required to improve neonatal survival
in preterm pregnancies complicated by diabetes. ACS
therapy is absolutely contraindicated in systemic
maternal infections such as tuberculosis, and advised
with caution in chorio-amnionitis.[3] These medical
aspects have to be considered before prescribing ACS
in immuno-compromised states like uncontrolled
diabetes.
Use of antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis for threatened
preterm labor has become more prevalent in recent
years. Gestational diabetes is not considered a relative
contraindication for ACS. In fact, women with gestational
Glycemic Management after Antenatal
Corticosteroid Therapy
Sanjay Kalra, Bharti Kalra1, Yashdeep Gupta2
Departments of Endocrinology, 1Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, Haryana, 2Medicine, Government
Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
Abstract
Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are recommended for use in antenatal mothers at risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks. One common
side-effect of these drugs is their propensity to cause hyperglycemia. A PubMed search was made using terms ‘steroid,’ ‘dexamethasone,’
‘betamethasone’ with diabetes/glucose. Relevant articles were extracted. In addition, important cross-reference articles were reviewed. This
review, based upon this literature search, discusses the available evidence on effects on glycemic status as well as management strategies in
women with pre-existing diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus, as well as normoglycemic women after ACS use in pregnancy.
Keywords: Antenatal corticosteroid therapy, Betamethasone, Diabetes, Dexamethasone, Gestational diabetes mellitus, Pregnancy
Address for correspondence: Dr. Sanjay Kalra, Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Kunjpura Road, Karnal, Haryana -132 001, India.
E-mail: brideknl@gmail.com
Access this article online
Quick Response Code: Website:
www.najms.org
DOI:
10.4103/1947-2714.127744
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.najms.orgonSaturday,February22,2014,IP:115.240.8.93]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Kalra, et al.: Glycemic Management after ACS Therapy
North American Journal of Medical Sciences | February 2014 | Volume 6 | Issue 2 |
72
diabetes were more likely (odds ratio 1.21; 95%
condence interval 1.05-1.40) to receive ACS in a study
conducted in British Columbia, Canada.[4]
Points to Ponder
As the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)
increases, queries arise as to the
1. Indications for ACS in pre-existing, overt or GDM
complicated by threatened preterm delivery
2. Effects of ACS on glycemia
in previously euglycemic antenatal women
in women with GDM
in women with pre-existing diabetes (T1DM and
T2DM)
3. Glycemia monitoring in
all women receiving ACS
patients with GDM receiving ACS
patients with pre-existing or overt diabetes
4. Glycemic management after ACS administration
Answers to these questions can be gleaned from
recommendations and guidelines proposed by the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), on use of ACS in
1995, and on repeated courses of ACS in 2000;[1,5] the Royal
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) in
2010;[6] the Cochrane reviews on this topic,[7-9] as well
as the WAPM.[3] Recent studies on the subject, though
few in numbers, also provide valuable guidelines. Yet,
some questions still remain unanswered. This review
tries to explore the lacunae in our knowledge of ACS in
diabetes, and proposes solutions based on the concept
of logical empiricism.
Issue 1: Indications for ACS in GDM
Complicated by reatened Preterm
Delivery
In general, the indications for ACS are driven by obstetric
and perinatal, rather than medical, factors. Indications
remain the same, irrespective of glycemic status. The
NIH Consensus Development Panel of 1995 firmly
conducted that it was reasonable to use ACS in diabetes,
though the experts could not nd sufcient data for the
use of ACS in pregnancy complicated by diabetes.[1]
World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM)
clearly recommends ACS in antenatal women with
diabetes. It calls for “close monitoring and treatment by
an experienced obstetrical team” to guarantee diabetic
control” and “to avoid the possibility of severe transient
hyperglycemia.”[3]
A similar suggestion is made by the Fifth International
Workshop – Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
(2007). The recommendation acknowledges that the
frequency of preterm delivery is higher in women with
untreated GDM. It recommends following normal
indications for the use of ACS, albeit with “intensied
monitoring of maternal glucose levels” and “temporary
addition or increase of insulin doses.”[10]
However, the National Institute of Health and Clinical
Excellence (NICE) have published a clinical guideline
for diabetes in pregnancy that states that ‘diabetes
should not be considered a contra-indication to antenatal
corticosteroids.’[11]
The conventional antenatal corticosteroid regimes:
Betamethasone 12 mg IM q24h x 2 doses, or
dexamethasone 6 mg IM q12h x 4 doses, can be used
in diabetes. Unpublished data from our hospital
shows that three doses of betamethasone 8 mg, given
at 12 hourly intervals, lead to less hyperglycemia than
the conventional dosage regimes. Though the total
steroid dose remains the same, the lower boluses of
dexamethasone lead to lower glycemic peaks in patients
with GDM or pre-existing diabetes.
It must be remembered that strict maternal glycemic
control per se reduces the incidence of respiratory distress
syndrome in neonates of mothers with diabetes.
Suggestion
In consonance with all international guidelines, ideally,
all women with threatened preterm should receive ACS
as per routine obstetric practice, irrespective of diabetes
status.
The decision of prescribing ACS should be individualized,
based on the benet: risk rates in the particular clinical
situation. Lack of expertise in managing diabetes, for
example, may be a relative contraindication for ACS in
borderline patients. The availability of neonatal care will
also have a bearing upon obstetric decision making. In
doubtful cases, a team-based shared decision-making
approach, involving all members of the perinatal
care team- the endocrinologist, obstetrician, and
neonatologist, should be followed.
In extreme cases, where ACS may jeopardize maternal
health, e.g., in diabetic ketoacidosis or fulminant
infection, maternal health should take precedence over
fetal prophylaxis.
Issue 2: Eects of ACS on Glycemia
Long-term steroid therapy and GDM
The increased risk of GDM receiving long-term
glucocorticoid therapy is well-known,[12,13] but the effect
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.najms.orgonSaturday,February22,2014,IP:115.240.8.93]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Kalra, et al.: Glycemic Management after ACS Therapy
North American Journal of Medical Sciences | February 2014 | Volume 6 | Issue 2 | 73
of a few doses of corticosteroids on glucose metabolism
is less documented, especially in a cohort of persons
already at high risk of glucose intolerance. In general,
the glycemic effect of steroids begins about 12 hours after
the rst dose and lasts up to 5 days.[3]
ACS in women without pre-existing diabetes
In 10 healthy pregnant women volunteers, acting as
a control group, betamethasone in a dose of 12 mg
twice daily for one day was shown not to induce
hyperglycemia. However, this study by Ramirez-Torres
et al. monitored only fasting and post-prandial blood
glucose.[14]
In a retrospective study involving laboratory recorded
records of 3396 patients, Fisher et al. analyzed the
incidence of diagnosed GDM in patients receiving ACS.
Patients who received ACS for threatened preterm
delivery (n = 50) were more likely to have abnormal
one hour post-glucose challenge values (60% vs. 25%,
P < 0.001) and abnormal 3 hour glucose tolerance tests
(23.8% vs. 4.0%; P < 0.001%) than controls (n = 1985) who
were not exposed to ACS.[15]
In apparently healthy women, though fasting and post-
prandial glucose levels may remain normal after ACS,
50 g glucose challenge test may provide false-positive
reports (Gurbuz et al). Plasma glucose values measured
one hour after administration of 50 g glucose were higher
at 24 hours after ACS administration, as compared to
the tests done prior to ACS, (P < 0.001) in non-diabetic
women at risk of preterm labor. However, there was no
difference observed at 72 hours (P = 0.96) and 7 days
(P = 0.99) after ACS therapy. Screening results were
positive in 42.5%, 10%, and 5% of subjects, at 24 hours,
72 hours, and 7 days.[16]
In another study, using continuous glucose monitoring
(GDM), Refuerzo et al. identied a 16% to 33% increase
in glucose levels in pregnant women without diabetes,
at 20, 44, and 68 hours after receiving the rst dose of
ACS. A higher risk of 33% to 48% was noticed at the
same time periods in woman with diabetes. CGM is
thus able to identify short, but signicant, episodes of
hyperglycemia after ACS, which may be missed with
conventional monitoring.[17]
ACS in women with diabetes
In a retrospective study of 55 patients with diabetes
who received ACS, the impact on fasting and 2 hour
post-prandial glucose was measured. Fasting glucose
levels were elevated >95 mg% in over 90% of women on
day 2 and day 3 after ACS administration. At least one
post-prandial glucose value was elevated (>120 mg %)
in 81%-98% of women on days 1 through 3.[18]
Suggestion
There is no recommendation by any international
professional body to check blood glucose prior to
prescription of ACS. However, we strongly recommend
checking casual blood glucose before administering
corticosteroids to any person. This is indicated in view
of the high prevalence of GDM, and ts well with the
concept of targeted screening in high-risk persons. The
results also help inform decisions regarding the need
for further maternal surveillance, including ketonuria
and glycemia, the need for medical nutrition therapy,
and the possibility of insulin therapy. Most importantly,
this simple, economical investigation helps determine
the etiology and temporal prole of hyperglycemia, so
that dysglycemia detected later on in pregnancy or the
postpartum period is not attributed iatrogenic causes
(ACS) by the patient and her family.
Steroid use should warrant more aggressive screening for
GDM, above and beyond routine recommendations.[19]
Issue 3: Glycemia Monitoring in Peri-ACS
Period
Recommendations for screening for gestational diabetes
mellitus are a subject of great controversy. None of the
various recommendations specically suggest screening
methods for women receiving ACS.
As described earlier, 50 g glucose challenge test may
provide false-positive reports immediately after ACS.
Studies imply that screening tests for GDM should not be
performed for up to 1 week after ACS administration.[16]
Suggestion
Euglycemic women should undergo screening for GDM
as per routine obstetric practice. However, steroid use
should warrant more aggressive screening for GDM,
above and beyond routine recommendations. Blood
glucose estimation must be done prior to administration
of ACS. Regular frequent feto-maternal surveillance
must be carried out in the patient-ward for at least 5 days
after ACS administration.
Frequency and nature of monitoring required will vary
with the nature of diabetes. The need for monitoring in
various types of diabetes is listed in descending order,
as follows: Pre-existing type 1 diabetes mellitus, pre-
existing type 2 diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes
mellitus on insulin, and gestational diabetes mellitus on
medical nutrition therapy.
Ideal frequency of monitoring in antenatal women
with diabetes is a 7 point prole, including 3 pre- meal
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.najms.orgonSaturday,February22,2014,IP:115.240.8.93]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Kalra, et al.: Glycemic Management after ACS Therapy
North American Journal of Medical Sciences | February 2014 | Volume 6 | Issue 2 |
74
estimations, 3 post-meal estimations, and a 3 am value.
This is concordant with recommendation for routine
management of gestational diabetes mellitus.[10] Urine
ketone estimation and continuous glucose monitoring
may be considered in select patient populations.
Issue 4: Glycemic Management in Women
with Diabetes aer ACS Administration
The challenges in management of glycemia after ACS
are well documented. No simple, one-size-fits-all
solution is available for this clinical challenge. An
individualized approach is necessary, because of the
wide inter-individual and intra-individual variability
noted in degree and duration of hyperglycemia after
steroid injections.
The NICE guideline recommends that diabetic women
receiving steroids should have additional insulin
according to an agreed protocol.[11] The national
Indian guidelines on indoor management of diabetes
recommend a 20% increase in the dose of insulin in
persons with diabetes who receive steroid therapy.[20]
In the study by Ramirez-Torres,[14] patients with GDM,
treated by diet alone, required insulin de novo in 40%
cases, which those already on insulin needed an increase
of 39% to 112% in the daily insulin dose. An increased
requirement of 26% to 64% was documented in women
with pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus on insulin
therapy. The greatest changes occurred on the 2nd, 3rd, and
4th day after ACS therapy. This nding highlights the need
for regular glycemic monitoring during this period, and a
proactive increase in insulin doses, if clinically indicated.
In another retrospective study of 55 patients with
diabetes who received ACS, insulin had to be started
in 11 of 19 women earlier controlled on diet, and in
3 of 6 patients earlier controlled with glyburide.[18]
Kaushal et al. published a nurse-driven protocol to
manage diabetes and prevent hyperglycemia after
the use of intramuscular dexamethasone in antenatal
women. They continued subcutaneous insulin and diet
and added intravenous insulin infusion from the rst
dexamethasone dose until 12 h after the second. Titration
was based on hourly blood glucose measurements, using
any of four-graded sliding scales, selected according
to the patient’s current subcutaneous insulin dose and
modified as per blood glucose values. The median
amount of supplementary intravenous insulin required
was 74 U (range 32-88 U).[21]
A proactive approach to insulin dose modication may
help control glycemia after ACS and avoid deleterious
effects to both mother and fetus. An increase in dose
of 16% to 40% has been recommended by various
authors.[18,22]
Suggestion
Medical nutrition therapy should be reinforced in all
patients receiving ACS, irrespective of prior glycemic
status. High calorie foods should be avoided for up to 5
days after ACS administration.
Insulin therapy may be required for a short period,
after ACS therapy, in women who were previously well
controlled on medical nutrition therapy. Both the patient
and the health care provider should be prepared for such
a possibility.
In patients already on insulin, an increase in dosage
or a change in insulin regime may be mandated. If
glycemic control is not achieved by increasing the dose
of insulin by 20-30%, it may be advisable to increase
the number of injections per day. This can be done by
adding rapid acting insulin by substituting pre-mixed
insulin with rapid acting insulin or by changing basal
insulin to pre-mixed or basal bolus regime [Table 1]. In
rare cases, intravenous insulin may be needed to achieve
glycemic control. Indications for intravenous insulin
include ketoacidosis, highly uncontrolled glycemia
not responding to subcutaneous insulin, and fetal or
maternal distress deemed due to hyperglycemia.
Regular glycemic monitoring is necessary with
intensive insulin therapy and is the basis of insulin dose
adjustment. Hyperglycemia and hypokalemia both,
which are side-effects of aggressive insulin therapy, are
linked with intrauterine death and must be avoided.
Feto-maternal surveillance should continue along with
routine obstetric care.
The national Indian guidelines, which recommend a
20% increase in dose, seem a reasonable suggestion. A
small subset of patients, however, may require more
aggressive up titration.
Summary
ACS has proven benefits for neonatal survival in
antenatal women with threatened preterm labor, many
of whom may have co-existing diabetes. All women
with threatened preterm should receive ACS as per
routine obstetric practice irrespective of diabetes status.
Exceptions will include medical conditions that may
worsen with steroid therapy.
Blood glucose estimation must be done prior to
administration of ACS. Regular frequent fetomaternal
surveillance must be estimated on indoor basis for at
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.najms.orgonSaturday,February22,2014,IP:115.240.8.93]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Kalra, et al.: Glycemic Management after ACS Therapy
North American Journal of Medical Sciences | February 2014 | Volume 6 | Issue 2 | 75
least 5 days after ACS administration. Frequency and
nature of monitoring required will vary with the nature
of diabetes.
Medical nutrition therapy should be reinforced in all
patients receiving ACS irrespective of prior glycemic
status. Supplementary insulin should be added, using
a proactive approach, to minimize the negative impact
of hyperglycemia upon mother and fetus. However,
individualization of therapy is needed to ensure optimal
management.
There is a great need for further research in this
important, yet relatively neglected, eld of obstetric
diabetology.
References
1. Effect of Corticosteroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal
Outcomes. NIH Consens Statement 1994;12:1-24.
2. Ballard PL, Ballard RA. Scientific basis and therapeutic
regimens for use of antenatal glucocorticoids. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1995;173:254-62.
3. Miracle X, Di Renzo GC, Stark A, Fanaroff A, Carbonell-
Estrany X, Saling E; Coordinators Of World Associatin of
Perinatal Medicine Prematurity Working Group. Guideline
for the use of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal maturation.
J Perinat Med 2008;36:191-6.
4. Kazem M, Hutcheon JA, Joseph KS. A population-based study
of antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis for preterm birth.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34:842-8.
5. Antenatal corticosteroids revisited: Repeat courses. NIH
Consens Statement 2000;17:1-18.
6. Roberts D, Dalziel SR. Antenatal corticosteroids for
accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of
preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD004454.
7. Crowther CA, Harding JE. Repeat doses of prenatal
corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for
preventing neonatal respiratory disease. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2007;3:CD003935.
8. Brownfoot FC, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Different
corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung
maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2008;4:CD006764.
9. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG).
Antenatal corticosteroids to reduce neonatal morbidity and
mortality. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists (RCOG); 2010 Oct. 13 p. (Accessed August
4, 2013, at http://www.clinicalguidelines.scot.nhs.uk/
National%20Guidelines/RCOG%20No7.pdf).
10. Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, de Leiva
A, Dunger DB, Hadden DR, et al. Summary and
recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-
Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
Diabetes Care 2007;30 Suppl 2:S251-60.
11. National Institute for Health and Clinical
Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: Management of
diabetes and its complications from pre-conception to the
postnatal period. London: NICE, 2008. (Accessed August
4, 2013, at http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/
CG63NICEGuidelineReissue.pdf).
12. Ha Y, Lee KH, Jung S, Lee SW, Lee SK, Park YB. Glucocorticoid-
induced diabetes mellitus in patients with systemic lupus
erythematosus treated with high-dose glucocorticoid therapy.
Lupus 2011;20:1027-34.
13. Yildirim Y, Tinar S, Oner RS, Kaya B, Toz E. Gestational
diabetes mellitus in patients receiving long-term corticosteroid
therapy during pregnancy. J Perinat Med 2006;34:280-4.
14. Ramírez-Torres MA, Pérez-Monter SE, Espino y Sosa S,
Ibargüengoitia-Ochoa F. Effect of betamethasone in blood
glucose levels in pregnant diabetic women at risk of preterm
birth. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2011;79:565-71.
15. Fisher JE, Smit h RS, Lagrandeur R, Lorenz RP. Gestational diabetes
mellitus in women receiving beta-adrenergics and corticosteroids
for threatened preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:880-3.
16. Gurbuz A, Karateke A, Ozturk G, Kabaca C. Is 1-hour
glucose screening test reliable after a short-term
administration of antenatal betamethasone? Am J
Perinatol 2004;21:415-20.
17. Refuerzo JS, Garg A, Rech B, Ramin SM, Vidaeff A, Blackwell
SC. Continuous glucose monitoring in diabetic women
following antenatal corticosteroid therapy: A pilot study. Am
J Perinatol 2012;29:335-8.
Table 1: Strategies for glycemic control aer antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) therapy
Therapy Suggested therapy after ACS
Glycemic status Current Regimen
of patient Well controlled glycemia Poorly controlled glycemia
Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) Strict MNT Rapid acting insulin
Basal Insulin Dose optimization of basal insulin Intensify basal insulin to either pre-mixed insulin
or basal bolus regime
Pre-mixed insulin Dose optimization of pre-mixed insulin
Addition of rapid acting insulin to pre-mixed
insulin: either a Mix — Rapid — Mix or a
Rapid- Rapid-Mix regime can be followed
with three meals.
Intensify pre-mixed insulin to basal bolus regime
Addition of rapid acting insulin to pre-mixed
insulin, either a
Mix- Rapid — Mix or a
Rapid- Rapid-Mix regime can be followed.
Intravenous insulin
Basal bolus insulin Dose optimization
Addition of correction doses of rapid acting
insulin
Addition of subcutaneous correction doses
Intravenous Insulin
MNT = Medical nutrition therapy
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.najms.orgonSaturday,February22,2014,IP:115.240.8.93]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Kalra, et al.: Glycemic Management after ACS Therapy
North American Journal of Medical Sciences | February 2014 | Volume 6 | Issue 2 |
76
18. Kreiner A, Gil K, Lavin J. The effect of antenatal corticosteroids
on maternal serum glucose in women with diabetes. Open J
Obstet Gynecol 2012;2:112-5.
19. Kitzmiller JL, Block JM, Brown FM, Catalano PM, Conway
DL, Coustan DR, et al. Managing preexisting diabetes
for pregnancy: Summary of evidence and consensus
recommendations for care. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1060-79.
20. Bajwa SS, Baruah MP, Kalra S, Kapoor MC. Guidelines on
Inpatient Management of Hyperglycemia. In: Muruganathan
A, editor. Medicine Update. Vol. 23. Association of Physicians
of India; 2013. p. 164-9.
21. Kaushal K, Gibson JM, Railton A, Hounsome B, New JP,
Young RJ. A protocol for improved glycaemic control
following corticosteroid therapy in diabetic pregnancies.
Diabet Med 2003;20:73-5.
22. Mathiesen ER, Christensen AB, Hellmuth E, Hornnes P, Stage
E, Damm P. Insulin dose during glucocorticoid treatment
for fetal lung maturation in diabetic pregnancy: Test of an
algorithm [correction of analgoritm]. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand 2002;81:835-9
How to cite this article: Kalra S, Kalra B, Gupta Y. Glycemic management
after antenatal corticosteroid therapy. North Am J Med Sci 2014;6:71-6.
Source of Support: Nil. Conict of Interest: None declared.
New features on the journal’s website
Optimized content for mobile and hand-held devices
HTML pages have been optimized of mobile and other hand-held devices (such as iPad, Kindle, iPod) for faster browsing speed.
Click on [Mobile Full text] from Table of Contents page.
This is simple HTML version for faster download on mobiles (if viewed on desktop, it will be automatically redirected to full HTML version)
E-Pub for hand-held devices
EPUB is an open e-book standard recommended by The International Digital Publishing Forum which is designed for reflowable content i.e. the
text display can be optimized for a particular display device.
Click on [EPub] from Table of Contents page.
There are various e-Pub readers such as for Windows: Digital Editions, OS X: Calibre/Bookworm, iPhone/iPod Touch/iPad: Stanza, and Linux:
Calibre/Bookworm.
E-Book for desktop
One can also see the entire issue as printed here in a ‘flip book’ version on desktops.
Links are available from Current Issue as well as Archives pages.
Click on View as eBook
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.najms.orgonSaturday,February22,2014,IP:115.240.8.93]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
... The study participants were divided into two groups: group 1 comprised pregnant women who were euglycemic during the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test done at the gestational age of 24-28 weeks (n = 56) and group 2 who had DM (n = 37) (pre-existing DM (n = 7) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (n = 30)). All participants were administered two doses of intramuscular betamethasone 12 mg injection, 24 hours apart [10][11][12] immediately upon being prescribed antenatal corticosteroid therapy. Following the therapy, we monitored the capillary blood glucose levels using a glucometer (Contour TS, Bayer). ...
... Observations related to the initiation and modifications of the diabetes management regimen were noted. Based on data suggesting that the glycemic effect of betamethasone begins about 6-12 hours after the first dose and lasts up to 5-7 days [10][11][12], the glycemic status of hyperglycemic participants from group 1 was reassessed a week after corticosteroid therapy. Fasting plasma glucose levels of ≥95 mg/dL and one-hour post-meal glucose levels ≥140 mg/dL were considered abnormal and indicative of persistent hyperglycemia [17]. ...
... The progressively increasing insulin requirements seen in study participants were similar to findings from previous studies [3,4,12,18]. Important risk factors for this increased insulin requirement include obesity, family history of DM, and advanced age. ...
... Additionally, short-term antenatal corticosteroid therapy is commonly administered to women at risk of preterm delivery to promote fetal pulmonary maturation. Previous studies have recommended monitoring glycemic levels for at least 5 days after initiating corticosteroid therapy to detect any potential hyperglycemia (14,15). ...
... Impaired glucose tolerance and reduced insulin sensitivity induced by corticosteroid therapy in a mother, even if transient, might be enough to affect fetal glucose hemostasis (29,30). Overall, these findings underscore the importance of managing and monitoring blood glucose levels in pregnant women receiving corticosteroids to minimize disruptions in glucose metabolism and potential adverse effects on both maternal and neonatal health (14). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Corticosteroid administration may impair blood sugar control and cause other adverse effects in pregnant women with moderate to severe COVID-19. To our knowledge, there have been no studies on the effect of corticosteroid therapy on pregnant women with COVID-19 infection in terms of hyperglycemia or insulin needs. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 different regimens of corticosteroid therapy, specifically dexamethasone, and methylprednisolone, in terms of their impact on newly diagnosed hyperglycemia in pregnant women infected with COVID-19, as well as the duration of this condition. Methods: The current cohort study was conducted from August to November 2021 on hospitalized pregnant women with severe COVID-19. They received either the first protocol, which involved daily administration of 2 mg/kg of methylprednisolone intravenously, or the second protocol, which included daily intravenous administration of 6 mg of dexamethasone. The study aimed to compare the incidence and duration of hyperglycemia until delivery between these 2 groups. Results: A total of 59 participants were recruited after meeting the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients between the 2 groups. Among the 59 pregnant women included in the study, 24 (40.7%) developed hyperglycemia that required insulin therapy. The incidence of hyperglycemia did not significantly differ between the 2 treatment regimens (P-value = 0.069). In the follow-up period, hyperglycemia resolved in both groups within up to 4 weeks after treatment, and they no longer required insulin. Conclusions: Corticosteroid-treated pregnant patients are associated with transient hyperglycemia, the incidence of which is unrelated to the type of corticosteroid used. Therefore, corticosteroid administration should be initiated with caution and monitored appropriately in pregnant women with COVID-19 infection.
... No hypoglycemic episodes were documented. Mathiesen et al. 20 described one week of glycemicsurveillance, while Kalra et al. 21 proposed at least five days following ACS, we followed the latter in our patients. ...
... Use of ACSs is associated with changes in the glycemic status, high after 9-10 hours and is expected to be greater after 2-4 days of administration. 21 ACSs increase the requirement of insulin (39-112%) in GDM or necessitate introduction of insulin (40%) in the treatment regimen, which are more noticeable in those managed with MNT. 22 Few may require additional OHA (glyburide). ...
... 16 So, its cautious use is recommended in diabetic pregnant women. 17 Our study followed a clear criterion in selecting the women with GDM who were at risk of preterm delivery. The index study identified the hyperglycemic effects of 2 different dose regimens of antenatal steroids given to women with gestational diabetes. ...
Article
Full-text available
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare three consecutive days of hyperglycemic response following antenatal Dexamethasone regimens of 12mg or 6mg in diet-controlled gestational diabetes, administered for fetal lung maturity. Methodology: Forty women who met inclusion criteria were selected and assigned to two Groups. Group-A was administered quartered 24 mg steroids 6 hours daily, and Group-B was administered halved 24mg 12 hours daily. Blood sugar levels (BSL) were recorded before and after meals, thrice a day for three consecutive days, and on proforma. Results: Among the selected patients, the mean age was 25.5±2.9 years, and the mean gestational age (duration of pregnancy) was 30.3±2.0 weeks. Out of six blood sugar levels recorded daily for three consecutive days, the episodes of hyperglycemia in the (Group-B) 12-hourly steroid dose were found to be less significant than those in the (Group-A) split 6-hourly dose. Conclusion: The recommended 12 mg, twice-a-day regimen of antenatal corticosteroids was better than the proposed 6mg, four times a day regimen as it caused fewer hyperglycemic episodes in gestational diabetics.
... 16 So, its cautious use is recommended in diabetic pregnant women. 17 Our study followed a clear criterion in selecting the women with GDM who were at risk of preterm delivery. The index study identified the hyperglycemic effects of 2 different dose regimens of antenatal steroids given to women with gestational diabetes. ...
Article
Objective: To compare three consecutive days of hyperglycemic response following antenatal Dexamethasone regimens of 12mg or 6mg in diet-controlled gestational diabetes, administered for fetal lung maturity. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Combined Military Hospital, Kharian Pakistan, from Oct 2020 to Mar 2021. Methodology: Forty women who met inclusion criteria were selected and assigned to two Groups. Group-A was administered quartered 24 mg steroids 6 hours daily, and Group-B was administered halved 24mg 12 hours daily. Blood sugar levels (BSL) were recorded before and after meals, thrice a day for three consecutive days, and on proforma. Results: Among the selected patients, the mean age was 25.5±2.9 years, and the mean gestational age (duration of pregnancy) was 30.3±2.0 weeks. Out of six blood sugar levels recorded daily for three consecutive days, the episodes of hyperglycemia in the (Group-B) 12-hourly steroid dose were found to be less significant than those in the (Group-A) split 6-hourly dose. Conclusion: The recommended 12 mg, twice-a-day regimen of antenatal corticosteroids was better than the proposed 6mg, four times a day regimen as it caused fewer hyperglycemic episodes in gestational diabetics.
... Prior to pregnancy, all drugs that are risky in pregnancy should be discontinued, including OADs [74]. When corticosteroids are used in pregnancy for fetal lung maturation or any other indication, BGM and proactive optimization of glycemic control using insulin are mandatory [75]. Insulin is the drug of choice for treating hyperglycemia in pregnancy [3,74]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives The study aims to investigate whether the time interval between administering antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) and delivery influences the neonatal outcomes in late preterm (LPT) neonates (34 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks) born to mothers with diabetes. Study design This retrospective cohort study included women with any type of diabetes who gave birth between 34 + 0 weeks and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation. Based on the time interval between the first dose of corticosteroid and delivery, the cases were stratified into the following groups: <2, 2–7, and >7 days. Women unexposed to ACS served as the control group. The primary outcomes included the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia and respiratory distress syndrome/transient tachypnea of the newborn. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the time interval and neonatal outcomes and adjust for potential confounders. Results The study enrolled a total of 636 parturients. Among them, 247 (38.8%) delivered within 2 days after ACS administration, 169 (26.6%) within 2–7 days, and 126 (19.8%) at >7 days. Baseline characteristics such as type of diabetes, methods of glycemic control, preterm premature rupture of membrane, placenta previa, cesarean delivery, indication for delivery, percentage of large for gestational age, birth weight, and HbA1c in the second or third trimester were significantly different among the four groups. The multivariate analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of primary or secondary neonatal outcomes between the case and control groups. Conclusions ACS treatment was not associated with neonatal hypoglycemia and respiratory outcomes in LPT neonates born to diabetic mothers, regardless of the time interval to delivery.
Article
Full-text available
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) at reproductive age is rising. Women with T2DM have a similarly high risk for pregnancy complications as pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. To reduce adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, such as preeclampsia and preterm delivery, a multi-target approach is necessary. Tight glycemic control together with appropriate gestational weight gain, lifestyle measures, and if necessary, antihypertensive treatment and low-dose aspirin is advised. This narrative review discusses the latest evidence on preconception care, management of diabetes-related complications, lifestyle counselling, recommendations on gestational weight gain, pharmacologic treatment and early postpartum management of T2DM.
Article
Background: The Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) trial found that corticosteroid administration decreased respiratory complications by 20% among late preterm singleton deliveries. After the ALPS trial, the administration of corticosteroids increased by 76% among twin pregnancies and 113% among singleton pregnancies with pregestational diabetes (PDM) compared to expected rates based on the pre-APLS trial trend. However, the effect of corticosteroids on twin pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by PDM is not well studied, as the ALPS trial excluded twin pregnancies and pregnancies with PDM. Objective: We sought to examine the change in the incidence rate of immediate assisted ventilation use and ventilation use for more than 6 hours among those two populations after the dissemination of the ALPS trial at the population level. Study design: This study was a retrospective analysis of publicly available US birth certificate data. The study period was from August 1, 2014, to April 30, 2018. The dissemination period of the ALPS trial was from February 2016 to October 2016. We conducted population-based interrupted time series analyses for two target populations: (1) twin pregnancies without PDM and (2) singleton pregnancies complicated by PDM. For both target populations, we limited analyses to individuals who delivered non-anomalous live neonates between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks' gestation (vaginal or cesarean). As a sensitivity analysis, a total of 23 placebo tests were conducted before (5 tests) and after (18 tests) the dissemination period, respectively RESULTS: For the analysis of late preterm twin deliveries, 191,374 individuals without PDM were identified. For the analysis of late preterm singleton pregnancy with PDM, 21,395 individuals were identified. After the dissemination period, the incidence rate of immediate assisted ventilation use for twin late preterm deliveries was significantly lower than the expected value based on the pre-ALPS trend (11.6% observed vs. 13.0% expected; adjusted IRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97). The incidence rate of ventilation use for more than 6 hours among twin late preterm deliveries did not change significantly after the dissemination of the ALPS trial. A significant increase in the incidence rate of immediate assisted ventilation use and ventilation use for more than 6 hours was found among singleton pregnancy with PDM. However, the results of placebo tests suggested that the increase in incidence was not necessarily due to the dissemination period of the ALPS trial. Conclusion: The dissemination of the ALPS trial was associated with decreased incidence of immediate assisted ventilation use, but no change in ventilation use for more than 6 hours, among twin late preterm deliveries in the United States. On the other hand, the incidence of neonatal respiratory outcomes among singleton deliveries with pregestational diabetes did not decrease after the dissemination of the ALPS trial.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To evaluate changes in serum glucose val-ues following administration of corticosteroids in women with gestational (GDM) or pre-gestational dia-betes (PGDM). Method: Patients with diagnoses of pregnancy and GDM or PGDM from 2006-2009 who received corticosteroids for enhancement of fetal pul-monary maturity as an inpatient were identified fol-lowing IRB approval. Fasting (FSG) and two hour post prandial serum (PPSG) glucose levels, and oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and insulin given were recorded. Day 1 (D1) was the day the first dose of corticosteroid was administered. The percentage of women with FSG > 95 mg/dL and the percentage with at least one PPSG > 120 mg/dL during each day were calculated. Data were analyzed utilizing SPSS v15. Results: Fifty-five patients met the study criteria. FSG was greater than 95 mg/dL in over 90% of women on Days 2 and 3 and remained elevated in 51% on Day 4. At least one PPSG was greater than 120 mg/dL in 81% -98% on Days 1 -3, and in over 60% on Days 4 -6. The majority of women taking insulin received increases in doses that were less than double their regular dose (26 out of 33); the others received higher doses. Three of 6 patients who began the study taking glyburide were started on insulin. Of the 19 who began the study with diet controlled GDM, 11 were started on medication. Conclusion: Women with GDM or PGDM who are administered antenatal corticosteroids will experience prolonged serum glu-cose levels above the range associated with optimal pregnancy outcome.
Article
Full-text available
The bethametasone (BTM) induced hyperglycemia is not adequately known and managed in diabetic pregnant women. To compare the betamethasone-induced hyperglycemia in pregnant women either healthy or with gestational or type 2 diabetes mellitus (diabetes mellitus). Forty volunteer pregnant women at risk of premature rupture of membranes who received betamethasone (12 mg i.m. every 24 hours, 2 doses) were divided in four groups (10 women each): G1, healthy; G2, Diet treated diabetes mellitus; G3, Diet plus insulin treated diabetes mellitus; G4, type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with diet (n=6) or diet and insulin (n=4). Pre (p) and 2h-postprandial (pp) capillary blood glucose was measured throughout the day during 5 days of hospitalization. Student't test for independent and dependent samples was used. G1 had no significant changes in p or pp glucose. In G2 four women required de novo insulin administration while insulin dose was increased 39 to 112% and 26 to 64% in all women in G3 and G4, respectively to maintain p and pp glucose levels <95 mg/dL and < 120 mg/dL, respectively. The greatest changes occurred between days 2 to 4 after betamethasone. Betamethasone-induced hyperglycemia was greater in insulin treated women with gestational or type 2 diabetes and should not be administrated on an out-patient basis.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of glucocorticoid-induced diabetes mellitus (GDM) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) receiving high-dose glucocorticoid therapy. Patients with SLE who had received high-dose glucocorticoid therapy (prednisolone ≥1 mg/kg/day) at Yonsei University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, were recruited between January 1999 and June 2009. In total 127 patients with SLE were evaluated. Sixteen (12.6%) of them developed GDM after high-dose glucocorticoid therapy (95% confidence interval, 6.8-18.4%). Univariate analysis showed that old age, family history of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, higher body mass index, higher mean dose of prednisolone before high-dose glucocorticoid therapy, and concurrent use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were factors that would increase the likelihood of GDM. Multivariate analysis determined that age, family history of DM, mean dose of prednisolone before high-dose glucocorticoid therapy and concurrent use of MMF were independent associated factors for GDM. In summary, GDM was developed among 12.6% of patients with SLE after high-dose glucocorticoid therapy. Old age, family history of DM, higher mean dose of prednisolone before high-dose glucocorticoid therapy and concurrent use of MMF were determined to be factors responsible for increasing the risk of developing GDM.
Article
Background: Despite the widespread use of antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants, there is currently no consensus as to the type of corticosteroid to use; nor the dose, frequency, timing of use or the route of administration. Objectives: To assess the effects of different corticosteroid regimens for women at risk of preterm birth. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (13 February 2013). Selection criteria: All identified published and unpublished randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised control trials comparing any two corticosteroids (dexamethasone or betamethasone or any other corticosteroid that can cross the placenta), comparing different dose regimens (including frequency and timing of administration) in women at risk of preterm birth were included. We planned to exclude cross-over trials and cluster-randomised trials. We included studies published as abstracts only along with studies published as full-text manuscripts Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Data were checked for accuracy. Main results: For this update, 12 trials (1557 women and 1661 infants) were included. Dexamethasone was associated with a reduced risk of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) compared with betamethasone (risk ratio (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.92; four trials, 549 infants). No statistically significant differences were seen for other primary outcomes: respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.27; five trials, 753 infants) and perinatal death (neonatal death RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.67; four trials, 596 infants). Similarly, very few differences were seen for secondary outcomes such as rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) although in one trial, those infants exposed to dexamethasone, compared with betamethasone, had a significantly shorter length of NICU admission (mean difference (MD) -0.91 days, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.05; 70 infants). Results for biophysical parameters were inconsistent, but mostly no clinically important differences were seen.Compared with intramuscular dexamethasone, oral dexamethasone significantly increased the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR 8.48, 95% CI 1.11 to 64.93) in one trial of 183 infants. No statistically significant differences were seen for other outcomes reported.Apart from a reduced maternal postpartum length of stay for women who received betamethasone at 12-hourly intervals compared to 24-hourly intervals in one trial (MD -0.73 days, 95% CI -1.28 to -0.18; 215 women), no differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes were seen between the different betamethasone dosing intervals assessed. Similarly, no significant differences in outcomes were seen when betamethasone acetate and phosphate was compared with betamethasone phosphate in one trial. Authors' conclusions: It remains unclear whether one corticosteroid (or one particular regimen) has advantages over another.Dexamethasone may have some benefits compared with betamethasone such as less IVH, and a shorter length of stay in the NICU. The intramuscular route may have advantages over the oral route for dexamethasone, as identified in one small trial. Apart from the suggestion that 12-hour dosing may be as effective as 24-hour dosing of betamethasone based on one small trial, few other conclusions about optimal antenatal corticosteroid regimens were able to be made. No long-term results were available except for a small subgroup of 18 month old children in one trial. Trials comparing the commonly used corticosteroids are most urgently needed, as are trials of dosages and other variations in treatment regimens.
Article
The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the Effect of Corticosteroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal Outcomes brought together specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, pharmacology, epidemiology, and nursing, basic scientists in physiology and cellular biology, and the public to address the following questions: (1) For what conditions and purposes are antenatal corticosteroids used, and what is the scientific basis for that use? (2) What are the short-term and long-term benefits of antenatal corticosteroid treatment? (3) What are the short-term and long-term adverse effects for the infant and mother? (4) What is the influence of the type of corticosteroid, dosage, timing and circumstances of administration, and associated therapy on treatment outcome? (5) What are the economic consequences of this treatment? (6) What are the recommendations for use of antenatal corticosteroids? and (7) What research is needed to guide clinical cars? After 1 1/2 days of presentations by experts and discussion by the audience, a consensus panel weighed the evidence and prepared its consensus statement. The consensus panel concluded that antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal maturation reduces mortality, respiratory distress syndrome, and intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. These benefits extend to a broad range of generational ages (24 to 34 weeks) and are not limited by gender or race. Although the beneficial effects of corticosteroids are greatest more than 24 hours after beginning treatment, treatment less than 24 hours in duration may also improve outcomes. The benefits of antenatal corticosteroids are additive to those derived from surfactant therapy. In the presence of preterm premature rupture of the membranes, antenatal corticosteroid therapy reduces the frequency of respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, and neonatal death, although to a lesser extent than with intact membranes. Whether this therapy increases either neonatal or maternal infection is unclear. However, the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage and death from prematurity is greater than the risk from infection. Data from trials with follow-up of children up to 12 years of age indicate that antenatal corticosteroid therapy does not adversely affect physical growth or psychomotor development. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy is indicated for women at risk of premature delivery with few exceptions and will result in a substantial decrease in neonatal morbidity and mortality, as well as substantial savings in health care costs. The use of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal maturation is a rare example of a technology that yields substantial cost savings in addition to improving health. The full text of the consensus panel's statement follows.
Article
Objective: National and international clinical practice guidelines, based on the meta-analysis of randomized trials, recommend antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) prophylaxis for threatened preterm delivery. We carried out a study to determine the extent to which current clinical practice in British Columbia adheres to these guidelines with a focus on preterm deliveries at 33 to 34 weeks of gestation. Methods: Data were obtained from the British Columbia Perinatal Database Registry, a comprehensive provincial registry containing detailed information on all births in the province. All preterm live births between 2000 and 2009 were included in the study. The rate of ACS administration was assessed in different gestational age groups. Determinants of ACS administration (such as maternal characteristics and obstetric factors) were also studied. The frequency of ACS prophylaxis was estimated using rates and exact 95% confidence intervals, and associations were assessed using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Among 35 862 preterm births in British Columbia, the rate of ACS administration was 56.0% in the 26- to 32-week group (95% CI 54.7% to 57.4%) and 19.4% in the 33- to 34-week group (95% CI 18.5% to 20.4%). Rates were reasonably consistent between 2000 and 2009 and by region of residence in British Columbia. Women with hypertension (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.72), gestational diabetes (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.05 t01.40), and iatrogenic deliveries (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.47) were significantly more likely to receive ACS. Conclusion: Despite explicit clinical guidelines, ACS usage in preterm deliveries at 33 to 34 weeks of gestation appears to be suboptimal.
Article
To compare the timing, duration, and severity of corticosteroid-associated hyperglycemia in pregnant women with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). An observational study was conducted of pregnant women with DM and controls who received corticosteroids. Median glucose levels were calculated over 4-hour intervals after the first dose of corticosteroid with a continuous glucose monitor. A glucose level increase of at least 15% above baseline was considered significant. Nine pregnant women participated in this study (six with DM and three without DM). Elevations of glucose levels occurred at hour 20, 44, and 68 in both groups and lasted for up to 4 hours. In those with DM, glucose levels increased 33 to 48%, whereas in those without DM, glucose levels rose 16 to 33%. Several, relatively short episodes of glucose elevation occur in response to corticosteroids, and are more pronounced in diabetic women.
Article
Babies born early are at risk of death, lung problems (respiratory distress syndrome) and bleeding of the brain (intraventricular haemorrhage). Corticosteroids are given to the mother to help stop these problems occurring and there is high-quality evidence that they are effective in preventing many of these problems. These drugs work by maturing the baby's lungs before birth. There are different types of corticosteroids and they can be given in different ways and in different doses. Since there is no clear or agreed best type or dose, hospitals may vary in how they give this drug. Most trials have compared the two most commonly used corticosteroids before early birth, dexamethasone and betamethasone. In this review of ten trials, nine trials compared dexamethasone and betamethasone; and one trial compared two different ways of giving dexamethasone. We found that dexamethasone and betamethasone showed similar results, although there was less bleeding of the brain (but perhaps more frequent admission to the neonatal intensive care unit) for dexamethasone compared with betamethasone. On the basis of one trial, giving dexamethasone by injection (intramuscularly) may be better than giving the drug to the mother by mouth. We need more studies to establish which is the best drug and which is the best way to give it, and babies in these trials need to be followed up over a long period to monitor any effects on child and adult development.
Article
The report of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the Effect of Corticosteroids for Fetal Maturation comes 25 years after the pioneering observations of Liggins.(1) In that interval much has been learned about effects and mechanisms of corticosteroids in developing lung and other tissues, and prenatal steroid therapy has become standard practice in many medical communities. In this review we summarize the evidence that provides the scientific rationale for antenatal treatment and the recommended doses of corticosteroids.
Article
To determine whether the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increased in patients receiving corticosteroids with or without beta-adrenergic agents for threatened preterm delivery. We reviewed the laboratory records of 3396 patients undergoing screening (1-hour glucose) and diagnostic testing (3-hour glucose tolerance test [GTT]) for GDM over 2 years. Patients with antepartum admissions during which they received corticosteroids with or without beta-adrenergic agents for threatened preterm delivery were compared with a control group during the same period. Differences between the study and control groups were analyzed using chi 2, Student t test, or Fisher exact test where appropriate. P < .05 was considered significant. Fifty patients in the study group were compared with 1985 control patients. The remaining 1361 patients failed to meet inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of diagnosed GDM was significantly greater in the corticosteroid-beta-adrenergic agents study group, in which five (23.8%) of 21 patients screened had abnormal 3-hour GTT results, compared with 79 (4.0%) of 1985 controls (P = .001). One-hour glucose screening test results were abnormal in 60% of the study group compared with 25% of the controls (P < .001). Patients treated with beta-adrenergic agents and corticosteroids for threatened preterm delivery are at a significantly increased risk for developing GDM. The high rate of abnormal results in response to the 1-hour glucose screen suggests that this test is of limited value in patients exposed to these medications.