Technical ReportPDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This Policy Brief ispart of a series of policy briefs identifying and assessing evidence-based patient safety and quality improvement interventions appropriate for use by state Flex Programs and CAHs.Because falls are among the significant adverse events experienced in hospitals, falls prevention is a critical component of any patient safety strategy. Partnership for Patients, a public-private partnership funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, includes as one of its nine areas of focus Injuries from Falls and Immobility which are a significant cause of hospital-acquired injury. Partnership for Patients estimates that 25% of fall injuries are preventable and the goal set for hospitals is to cut the number of preventable fall injuries in half while maintaining or increasing patients' mobility by 2013. This Policy Brief by the Flex Monitoring Team aligns with the goals of Partnership for Patients and describes strategies applicable to Critical Access Hospitals and State Flex Programs. Key Findings: Hospital falls are a serious patient safety problem, accounting for nearly 84% of all inpatient incidents. Most falls commonly occur as a result of medication related issues, toileting needs, and hospital environmental conditions. Effective falls interventions target both intrinsic (e.g. physiologic) and extrinsic (e.g. environmental) risk factors. Effective falls prevention teams are interdisciplinary and ideally include pharmacists, nurses, physical therapists, medical, and quality officers and are imbedded in a culture of patient safety. Education for and communication across all staff contributes to successful falls prevention programs. Reporting falls data to one of the national organizations allows for benchmarking
Content may be subject to copyright.
Policy Brief #24
December 2011
Evidence-based Falls Prevention in Critical Access Hospitals
Karen B. Pearson, MLIS, MA and Andrew F. Coburn, PhD
Maine Rural Health Research Center, University of Southern Maine
This study was conducted by the Flex Monitoring Team with funding from the
federal Office of Rural Health Policy (PHS Grant No. U27RH01080)
Background
Inpatient falls are a serious patient safety and quality problem. Statistics
indicate that patient falls occur in approximately 1.9 to 3% of all
acute care hospitalizations1 with anywhere from 2-15% of inpatients
experiencing at least one fall.2 An estimated 30% of inpatient falls result
in serious injury.3 According to the Institute for Healthcare Improvement
(IHI), falls are a leading cause of death in people 65 years of age or older
and 10% of fatal falls for the elderly occur in hospitals.4 The majority of
falls occur in patients’ rooms and in bathrooms.5-7 Hospital environmental
conditions and medication related issues also put patients at risk for
falls.7 Falls in the elderly can contribute to a downward spiral, negatively
impacting physical and emotional health, long term function, and quality
of life. Additionally, a fall can often result in a fear of falling which may
lead to an increased risk for a future fall.8-10
Injuries from falls are costly for the patient and the hospital.1,11-12 Patients
injured in a fall incur increased hospital costs due to additional treatment
and longer lengths of stay. It is estimated that these patients sustain
upwards of 60% higher total charges than other hospitalized patients.13-15
The estimated cost to an acute care facility to treat the 30% of falls
resulting in serious injury is expected to reach $54.9 billion in 2020 [in
2007 dollars].16
Falls prevention within the context of patient safety culture
Because falls are among the significant adverse events experienced in
hospitals, falls prevention is a critical component of any patient safety
strategy. Effective communication among staff, patients, and their families
enhance information transfer, build relationships, and increase capacity
for positive patient safety culture change. Aberg, et al.8 state that “the
staff’s active participation in the fall event reporting system and in the
subsequent follow-up process constitutes an essential part of a fall
preventive safety culture”. p.1038
Key Findings
Hospital falls are a •
serious patient safety
problem, accounting
for nearly 84% of all
inpatient incidents.
Most falls commonly
occur as a result of
medication related
issues, toileting
needs, and hospital
environmental
conditions.
Effective falls •
interventions target
both intrinsic
(e.g. physiologic)
and extrinsic (e.g.
environmental) risk
factors.
Effective falls •
prevention teams
are interdisciplinary
and are imbedded in
a culture of patient
safety.
Education for and •
communication across
all staff contributes
to successful falls
prevention programs.
This brief is one in a series of policy briefs identifying and assessing evidence-based patient safety and quality
improvement interventions appropriate for use by state Flex Programs and CAHs.
www.exmonitoring.org
The Joint Commission frames falls prevention in
the context of organizational patient safety culture,
encouraging hospitals to assess the communication
issues as well as environmental modifications that
may be needed to help prevent falls.10 When all staff,
from CEOs to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs)
to custodians17 are attuned to the situations that
may predispose patients to fall, they will be better
prepared to make the hospital a safer place and
help prevent avoidable inpatient falls. One CAH in
Maine began posting the number of days without a
fall on the wall in the hospital lobby which served
to raise staff awareness and build teamwork in
maintaining its low fall rate. This hospital also found
that recognizing the involvement and importance of
the CNA in the prevention of falls contributes to the
positive culture of safety in their hospital.
In one rural hospital in Texas, the inpatient fall rate
was significantly reduced as the result of a culture
change,18 and a small community hospital in Canada
reduced its fall rate to 2% per 1,000 bed-days as part
of a larger change management process resulting
in a transformed patient safety culture.19 Staff at all
levels of a small rural hospital in Australia reported
that the process of their Falls Prevention Program
was a way to build teamwork and a safe practice
environment.20
Importance to CAHs and the Flex Program
The Flex Monitoring Team has identified falls
prevention as an important patient safety
intervention given the large number of rural elders
served by CAHs and the number of CAHs with
swing and long-term care beds (approximately 42%
CAHs have SNF services and nearly 90% CAHs have
swing beds).21 National surveys of CAHs conducted
by the Flex Monitoring Team in 2004 and 2007
indicated that falls prevention ranked second and
eighth respectively among CAH patient safety and
quality improvement initiatives.22-24 CAH initiatives
for prevention of patient falls included tracking
and analysis of falls; identifying and monitoring
patients at high risk of falls; education programs
for staff; use of special equipment (e.g. bed/chair
alarms, lift devices); and increased use of physical
therapy and exercise programs.23 Challenges and
obstacles to implementing and sustaining a falls
prevention program may include: other pressing
quality improvement initiatives; insufficient staff and
resources to oversee and sustain a falls prevention
program; not actively involving a pharmacist; and a
lack of alignment between a reporting mechanism
for tracking falls and programs of education and
training. One rural hospital consultant suggested
that, while an important quality issue, falls
prevention may not be formalized as a quality
improvement initiative in some small and rural
hospitals because it is built directly into their nursing
assessment. For some smaller hospitals, the fall rate
may be so close to zero that it doesn’t warrant full
scale system-level change. Small environmental
changes such as moving the patient closer to the
nurses’ station may be enough.
Falls Prevention Programs
Definitions of falls vary which can limit the
comparability and benchmarking of falls data
There is no universally accepted standard
definition for a fall. However, the most commonly
used definition for a fall comes from the Joint
Commission’s Implementation Guide for the
National Quality Forum Endorsed Nursing–Sensitive
Care Performance Measures (updated in 2009): falls
are an “unplanned descent to the floor (or extension
of the floor, e.g., trash can or other equipment) with
or without injury to the patient”.25 This includes both
assisted and unassisted falls. The Joint Commission
stresses the importance of a standard falls definition
in order for hospitals to accurately and consistently
track and trend fall data and states that “to reduce
the number of falls and improve overall safety, it
is important that the starting point for all reporting
and analysis begins with an organization’s clear,
consistent, and fully communicated definition of
falls.”3, p.14 Having a standard falls definition that
is interpreted and reported consistently within the
organization is key to improvement. In a study of
falls and injuries from falls in nine Midwestern
hospitals, three of which were rural, the authors
suggested that differences in fall circumstances
between types of hospitals may be a result of
differences in interpretations in the definitions of
falls and internal hospital reporting practices.12
Internal reporting and analysis are helpful and
important, but hospitals that also report their falls
data to an external organization have the added
benefit of benchmarking their data against national
2
www.exmonitoring.org
or peer organizations. One example is the National
Database for Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI)
which uses the Joint Commission definition of falls,
and provides benchmarking reports for hospitals with
fewer than 100 beds. Over 700 CAHs and other small
rural hospitals nationwide currently report falls data to
the Quality Health Indicators website (https://www.
qualityhealthindicators.org).* QHI provides reports
on unassisted falls for regional networks as well as
individual facilities.
Risk factors for falls
Inpatient falls are a persistent problem and are
frequently caused by a combination of risk factors
that are specific to patients and their conditions (i.e.,
intrinsic factors) and the hospital environment (i.e.,
extrinsic factors)26-27 (See Table 1). Understanding these
risk factors helps to identify appropriate prevention
strategies.
Intrinsic factors:• Factors related to the
patient’s physiology such as age-related
changes (decreased vision and mobility/gait
issues),1,7,20,28-31 urinary incontinence,6, 9,26
chronic illness,10 and confusion.14,31,32 Fall risk
for elders increases by as much as 4% for each
year of age.33 Polypharmacy, the use of five or
more medications, significantly increases the
fall risk for elderly patients.10,27,34,35 Additional
fall risk factors for elderly patients include
length of hospital stay, fear of falling, and
history of falls.3,6,9,26,27,32,36-38
Extrinsic factors:• Factors related to the physical
environment such as lack of grab bars, poor
condition of floor surfaces, inadequate or
improper use of assistive devices.39-41
Effective falls prevention programs include risk
assessment (e.g. identification of the patients at high
risk for falling, including physiologic/medication
factors).3,9,39,42-44 Morse classified falls into three
categories: accidental, anticipated physiologic, and
unanticipated physiologic.45,46 She suggested that since
78% of falls are related to anticipated physiologic
conditions, these can be identified early and safety
measures applied to prevent the fall. The Joint
Commission, based on research by Morse, notes that
“because the majority of falls can be anticipated and
linked to particular risk factors, it is essential to use
reliable and valid instruments for fall risk in order to
implement corresponding interventions”.3, p.87
The most commonly used risk assessment tools
are the Morse Fall Scale, the Hendrich II Fall Risk
Assessment, and the STRATIFY Risk Assessment
Tool.37,44,47-48 In a recent survey of Nebraska CAHs
and small rural hospitals, the majority use the Morse
Fall Scale.49 CAHs in Illinois use either the Morse
Fall Scale or the Hendrichs II Fall Risk. Reliance on
a valid risk assessment tool alone, however, is not
sufficient to predict and prevent all falls. In their
systematic review of risk factors and risk assessment,
Oliver and colleagues50 conclude that “even the
best, validated tools will fail to predict a significant
number of falls” and hospital staff should focus on
an integrated approach that incorporates using a
validated risk assessment during admission, targeting
common falls risk factors, modifying the environment,
and conducting post-fall assessments.
Additional components to an effective falls
prevention program include root cause analysis to
determine factors contributing to falls,51 interventions
including modification of the environment,50-54
and education and training of staff, patients, and
caregivers.3,8,11,17,20,30,42,54-55
Strategies and Interventions: Evidence from the
Literature
Relatively little is known about the extent to which
falls prevention interventions can be successfully
implemented in small rural hospitals. This is due
primarily to the fact that systematic reviews and
meta-analyses of falls in the elderly largely rely on
randomized controlled trials, which are difficult to
perform in small or rural hospitals56-60 and the fact
that the evidenced-based literature on falls and falls
prevention focuses more on community settings
rather than hospitals.61-66
Notwithstanding these limitations in the evidence
base, we identified falls prevention strategies in peer-
reviewed literature and through State Flex Programs
which are applicable to Critical Access Hospitals
(CAHs) and other small rural hospitals. (See Table
3
* The QHI website was developed through the Kansas Rural Health Options Project, a partnership between the Kansas Department of Health and
Environment Office of Local and Rural Health, the Kansas Hospital Association, the Kansas Board of Emergency Medical Services, and the Kansas Medical
Society, and is managed by the Kansas Hospital Association.
www.exmonitoring.org 4
2 for additional information about these strategies/
interventions.) In a recent study of nursing practices
on fall prevention in 51 community, academic,
Critical Access Hospitals, and Department of Veterans
Affairs facilities, the most common interventions
reported were bed alarms, rounding, sitters, and
moving the patient closer to the nurses’ station.48
Successful interventions are those that utilize a variety
of strategies, targeting the individual patient’s fall
risk, rather than focusing on just one aspect of falls
prevention.7,27,44,48-49,52-54,57,59,67-69 A common barrier to
a sustainable falls prevention program, especially for
small rural hospitals, is that these programs are not
often recognized as a high priority.18
The literature shows that effective falls prevention
interventions are interdisciplinary, ideally involving
pharmacy, nursing, medical, physical therapy,
and quality officers.58 Environmental changes
are the easiest to make in a falls prevention
program.3,15,20,27,30,49,58 The following list describes the
broad categories the evidence-based interventions
used in falls prevention programs and specific
initiatives within those categories:
Physiologic Changes
Toileting regimen• s are essential for elderly
patients who may be cognitively impaired or
incontinent6,70
Medication review• is highly recommended for
patients assessed as high fall risk.27,50,68,71
Environmental Changes
Alarms• : The use of bed alarms and personal
alarms is widespread as one intervention in
the prevention of inpatient falls.39,72-74
Restraints (including bedrails)• : Strategies
recommended for injury prevention for
acute care patients include: limiting restraint
use, lowering bedrails, and using floor
mats.1,10,39,48,69 Many hospital fall prevention
programs minimize or disallow the use of
restraints. However, the published evidence
on the use of bedrails is conflicting, with some
studies finding their use increases the risk of
a fall72,75 and others concluding the opposite,
that drastic reduction or discontinuation
in the use of bedrails may increase the risk
of falls.76-77 The use of bedrails as a falls
prevention strategy needs to be targeted to
the fall risk of the patient: e.g. patients who
are visually impaired or confused but mobile
enough to be at risk for climbing over bedrails
should not have their bedrails raised.76
Education and Training
Staff education• , from CNAs to Nurse
Managers, is a critical component of any falls
prevention program.3,17,42,51,78
Experience in CAHs
This section highlights the experience of several
Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) which are working
with their State Office of Rural Health or as individual
hospitals to provide falls prevention programs. The
selection is not all-inclusive, and CAHs and State Flex
Programs are encouraged to share their successes
and strategies with the federal Office of Rural Health
Policy.
In Nebraska, preliminary results from the Fall Risk
Reduction Survey of 65 CAHs (response rate 86%,
n= 56) conducted by Jones and colleagues49 indicate
that over half of the CAHs use a valid risk assessment
tool and include a specific definition of falls in their
policies and procedures. The most frequently reported
universal intervention reported by 98% of respondents
was to ensure that the patient’s call light was within
reach; the most frequently reported targeted (70%)
intervention involved the use of an elevated toilet
seat. Interventions are generally used in combination,
with hospitals reporting use of a median number
of four evidence-based targeted fall risk reduction
interventions.49
Nearly half of the responding Nebraska CAHs have
an organized team to conduct fall risk reduction
activities, and 35% indicated that they always
or frequently ”integrate evidence from multiple
disciplines” (e.g. medical, nursing, physical therapy,
and pharmacy).49 Approximately 39% of the CAHs
modify their policies and procedures based on the
collection and analysis of data; additionally these
39% also conduct root cause analyses (RCA) of
harmful falls.49
In West Virginia, a pilot study conducted by the
Patient Safety Improvement Corps in two facilities (a
small rural hospital and a CAH) showed a significant
The Patient Safety Improvement Corps is a national training program co-sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ) and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
www.exmonitoring.org 5
decrease in initial falls and 100% decrease in
repeat falls using root cause analysis. Based on
these positive results, a statewide training program
on performing RCAs was initiated for any West
Virginia health care facility or home health agency
wishing to participate and a State Falls Prevention
Collaborative was established. Six of the 11 facilities
in this Collaborative were CAHs. Among the 11
participating facilities, total falls per 1,000 patient
days decreased by 45 percent.51
The Montana Performance Improvement
Network, formed in 2002 with State Flex grant
funding, conducted a study in 2009 on reducing
preventable falls for CAH inpatients. Performance
measures focused on initial patient fall risk
assessment, intervention planning to reduce
fall risk, implementation of interventions, and
patient outcomes for the stay. Findings from the
study showed that 75% of participating CAHs
completed the fall risk assessment within 24 hours
of admission. Additionally, 100% of participating
CAHs reported that risk reduction interventions
are included in the nursing care plans. Over
half reported that medications are reviewed by
a pharmacist or provider,79 which is important
since one of the barriers to implementing a falls
prevention intervention lies in the need for medical
staff buy-in. Some of the CAHs do not have an
in-house pharmacist to conduct medication
assessments at admission and after a fall, so
they need to rely on staff physicians to perform
medication review which, for some, requires a solid
evidence base before the medical staff will agree.
Environmental changes, on the other hand, are
built into the culture of the hospitals since many
have swing-bed patients and staff are attuned to the
specific needs of this patient population.
The Maine Quality Forum (MQF) tracks the
number of inpatient falls with and without injury
per 1,000 inpatient days (http://www.mqf-online.
com/summary/intro.aspx). Thirteen of Maine’s
16 Critical Access Hospitals report data to the
MQF and are able to use these reports as a
benchmarking tool. Maine also has a Critical
Access Hospital Patient Safety Collaborative (http://
www.mainecahpatientsafety.net/), where falls
prevention is an important quality improvement
topic. Like most hospitals, Maine’s CAHs struggle
with staffing turnover and shortage of both nurses
and CNAs. One CAH in Maine has initiated a “Patient
Companion Program”, a paid sitter program, to help
overcome the problem of unattended patients who are
at high risk for falls. Although Tzeng and colleagues13
question the cost-effectiveness of a sitter program, it
is a solution that some hospitals, including CAHs in
Maine and elsewhere are trying with success, some
hiring CNAs as sitters, and some using volunteers.80
How Can State Flex Programs Help CAHs?
State Flex programs can assist CAHs in addressing the
problem of patient falls by:
Encouraging CAHs to use the Joint Commission’s •
definition of falls;
Providing technical assistance and support to help •
CAHs establish a consistent falls reporting system;
Encouraging CAHs to benchmark their •
performance against other CAHs;
Supporting the implementation of education and •
training programs for CAH nurses and staff on risk
assessment and falls prevention strategies;
Providing technical assistance and support to •
assist CAHs in implementing evidence-based falls
prevention initiatives.
Table 2 summarizes the falls prevention literature.
While these studies are primarily from larger
hospitals (due to the patient volume needed to
conduct randomized control trials), the strategies
reviewed, along with the results of these studies,
are likely applicable in hospitals of all sizes. State
Flex Programs can use these studies, as well as the
resources identified in the Tools and Resources List,
as a basis for working with the Flex Coordinators
and CAHs to educate and train hospital staff in
implementing a successful falls prevention program.
Below are highlights from the Montana and Illinois
State Flex Programs.
The Montana State Flex Program provides resources
to the state’s 48 CAHs including the Morse Fall Scale,
the Hendrich II Fall Risk Assessment tool, and best
practice evidence on falls as reported in the literature.
Montana’s CAHs do not all use the same falls
definition, but because many of the Montana CAHs
have swing beds, the State Flex Program encourages
them to use CMS’ guidelines for falls prevention in
long-term care. The State Flex Program also provides
tools for documentation, and opportunities to share
www.exmonitoring.org 6
best practices, protocols, and educational materials
with each other through day-long regional meetings.
They collect baseline data using a tool which
covers risk assessment, interventions, and post-fall
follow-up. Information collected is tabulated and
provided to each CAH with tables that compare the
hospital’s performance to the aggregate performance
of its peer hospitals. This information is analyzed
and compared across five peer groups facilitating
benchmarking across like-sized facilities. A summary
sheet with a composite score is made available to
the hospital board, a strategy that also encourages an
organizational approach to improving patient safety
culture.
The Illinois Critical Access Hospital Network
(ICAHN) uses a scorecard approach to gather data on
inpatient acute, inpatient swing, and long-term care
falls and injuries from falls. Many Illinois CAHs use
either the Morse Fall Scale or the Hendrich II Fall Risk
Assessment tools. ICAHN maintains an active listserv
to communicate data across reporting CAHs. ICAHN’s
challenge is to make the information useful to CAHs
affiliated with larger systems as well to the smaller
CAHs. The Director of Quality Services at ICAHN
noted the need to be consistent with education and to
encourage best practices across the CAHs. She would
like to see State Flex Program dollars used for future
education and training sessions or to send CAH staff
to the National Patient Safety Foundation conference
which will allow them to share evidence-based
practices within and across their hospitals.
Conclusion
The literature and the falls prevention activities of
CAHs suggest no single intervention makes or breaks
a falls prevention program. Rather, it is important
that hospital staff view falls risk and prevention as
an integral part of the overall patient safety culture
and the overall patient care process. An advanced
practice nurse at an academic hospital in Minneapolis
articulates this well:
“Through our various quality improvement
efforts, we have learned that the introduction
of virtually any evidence-based fall
prevention measure appears to reduce
fall rates and injury rates. Based on my
experience, simply raising awareness among
staff has been shown to reduce falls.78, p.1776
The number of inpatient falls at one Critical Access
Hospital in Maine was significantly reduced over the
course of a year through a combination of strategies
which included education and training across all
hospital staff, communication with patients and
their families/caregivers, assigning fall risk levels
based on a valid risk assessment tool, hiring CNAs as
sitters, and hourly rounding with a checklist. In rural
Texas, the Wise Regional Health System was able
to consistently and successfully reduce patient falls
by developing quality indicators to better identify
patients at risk for falls, and using that data to provide
more proactive and targeted interventions.18
The evidence is clear that a falls prevention program
that utilizes a standard definition of a fall, links
falls assessments to patient-specific intervention
strategies (utilizing a combination of interventions),
and reports and communicates falls data across staff
can reduce the number of hospital falls and injuries
from those falls. State Flex Programs and CAHs that
build upon this evidence base by formally targeting
falls prevention as a quality improvement and patient
safety initiative have an opportunity to make a
difference in patient safety.
For more information on this study, please contact Karen
Pearson at karenp@usm.maine.edu or 207-780-4553.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance
of Angie Charlet, Illinois Critical Access Hospital
Network; Katherine Jones, University of Nebraska
Medical Center; Darlene Bainbridge, DD Bainbridge
& Associates, Inc.; Kathy Wilcox, Montana
Performance Improvement Network; Laura Gamble
and the Fall Risk Committee, Providence Medical
Center, Wayne, Nebraska; Trudy O’Bar, Houlton
Regional Hospital, Houlton, Maine; Katrina Taggett,
Mayo Regional Hospital, Dover-Foxcroft, Maine; Tom
Mockus, Mount Desert Island Hospital, Bar Harbor,
Maine; and Alexander Dragaski, Maine Quality
Forum.
We also extend our thanks to colleagues at the
University of Minnesota and staff at the federal Office
of Rural Health Policy for their thoughtful review of
this policy brief.
www.exmonitoring.org 7
Intrinsic Risk Factors in Order of High to Low Risk*
Lower extremity weakness
History of falls
Gait/Balance decits
Use of assistive devices
Vision decit
Arthritis
Impaired ADLs
Depression
* Source: Gray-Micili30
Additional Intrinsic Risk Factors
Chronic illness
Orthostatic hypotension
Postural hypotension
Urinary incontinence
Mental/Cognitive decit
Medication/Polypharmacy
Antidepressants•
Antipsychotics: zolpidem•
Benzodiazapine•
Calcium channel antagonists•
Diuretics•
Hypoglycemics•
Laxatives•
Nonsteroidal anti-inammatory agents•
Sedatives/hypnotics•
Extrinsic Risk Factors
Lack of grab bars in the bath or toilet
Poor lighting
Height of bed or chairs
Improper use of assistive devices
Inadequate assistive devices
Poor condition of ooring surfaces
Improper footwear
Table 1. Fall Risk Factors
www.exmonitoring.org
Resources and Tools
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). (2011, December). Tips for Preventing Falls.
http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/1201/p1277.html
American Nurses Association. (2010, May). National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators
(NDNQI). Guidelines for Data Collection on the American Nurses Association’s National
Quality Forum Endorsed Measures: Nursing Hours per Patient Day, Skill Mix, Falls, Falls with
Injury. Kansas City, KS: ANA. https://www.nursingquality.org/ [click on sidebar link for “ANA’s
NQF-Endorsed Measure Specifications”]
ECRI Institute and Partnership for Patient Care. (2007). Failure mode and Effects Analysis: Falls
Prevention. https://www.ecri.org/Documents/Patient_Safety_Center/PPC_Falls_Prevention.pdf
Fall Prevention Resources and Research Articles (May 2010). http://www.agingservicesmn.org/
inc/data/AgingServicesHandoutResearch.pdf
Health Care Improvement Foundation, ECRI Institute, and Partnership for Patient Care. (2007).
Proactive Risk Assessment Research Summary: Falls Prevention. http://www.hcifonline.org/
files/893_file_Falls_Prevention_Research_Summary_FINAL.pdf
HealthCare.gov Implementation Center. Partnership for Patients: Better Care, Lower Costs.
Preventing Serious Fall Injuries and Immobility. http://www.healthcare.gov/center/programs/
partnership/safer/injuries.html
Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP). http://hospitalelderlifeprogram.org/
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). 2010. Health Care Protocol: Prevention of
Falls (Acute Care). http://www.icsi.org/falls__acute_care___prevention_of__protocol_/falls__
acute_care___prevention_of__protocol__24255.html
Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Reducing Harm From Falls. http://www.ihi.org/
knowledge/Pages/ImprovementStories/ABCsofReducingHarmfromFalls.aspx
Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Transforming Care at the Bedside How-to
Guide: Reducing Patient Injuries from Falls. 2008. http://www.ihi.org/knowledge/Pages/Tools/
TCABHowToGuideReducingPatientInjuriesfromFalls.aspx
Minnesota Hospital Association SAFE from FALLS Campaign (2007). This is a statewide initiative
aimed at preventing people from falling during a hospital stay. Includes toolkit and a “roadmap”
for falls prevention program.
http://www.mnhospitals.org/inc/data/tools/Safe-from-Falls-Toolkit/falls-prevention-roadmap.pdf
Montana Performance Improvement Network. Reduce Preventable Falls Clinical Study Baseline
Report. http://www.mtpin.org/index.php?p=cis-active-studies
Partnership For Patients. Preventing Serious Fall Injuries and Immobility.
http://www.healthcare.gov/compare/partnership-for-patients/safety/injuries.html
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). (2010, May 27). Prevention of Hospital Falls: An
RWJF National Program. (National Program Report: HFS). Princeton, NJ: RWJF. http://www.rwjf.
org/files/research/HFS.final.pdf
United States Department of Veterans Affairs. National Center for Patient Safety.
Falls Toolkit. http://www.patientsafety.gov/SafetyTopics/fallstoolkit/index.html
8
www.exmonitoring.org
References
1. Currie L. Fall and Injury Prevention In: Hughes RG . Ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based
Handbook for Nurses. (AHRQ Publication No. 08-0043). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality; 2008.http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nurseshdbk/docs/CurrieL_FIP.pdf
2. Halfon P, Eggli Y, Van Melle G, Vagnair A. Risk of Falls for Hospitalized Patients: a Predictive Model
Based on Routinely Available Data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54(12): 1258-66.
3. Smith IJ, Ed. Reducing the Risk of Falls in Your Health Care Organization. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint
Commission; 2005.
4. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Reducing Harm From Falls. [Web Page]. n.d. Available at: http://
www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/PatientSafety/ReducingHarmfromFalls/. Accessed May 4, 2011.
5. McCarter-Bayer A, Bayer F, Hall K. Preventing Falls in Acute Care: an Innovative Approach. J Gerontol
Nurs. 2005; 31(3): 25-33.
6. Tzeng HM. Understanding the Prevalence of Inpatient Falls Associated With Toileting in Adult Acute
Care Settings. J Nurs Care Qual. 2010; 25(1): 22-30.
7. Krauss MJ, Evanoff B, Hitcho E, et al. A Case-Control Study of Patient, Medication, and Care-Related Risk
Factors for Inpatient Falls. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(2): 116-22.
8. Aberg AC, Lundin-Olsson L, Rosendahl E. Implementation of Evidence-Based Prevention of Falls in
Rehabilitation Units: A Staff’s Interactive Approach. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41(13): 1034-40.
9. Dykes PC, Carroll DL, Hurley AC, Benoit A, Middleton B. Why Do Patients in Acute Care Hospitals Fall?
Can Falls Be Prevented? J Nurs Adm. 2009; 39(6): 299-304.
10. The Joint Commission. Good Practices in Preventing Patient Falls: A Collection of Case Studies.
Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources; 2007.
11. Dykes PC, Carroll DL, Hurley A, et al. Fall Prevention in Acute Care Hospitals: a Randomized Trial.
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010; 304(17): 1912-8.
12. Krauss MJ, Nguyen SL, Dunagan WC, et al. Circumstances of Patient Falls and Injuries in 9 Hospitals in
a Midwestern Healthcare System. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007; 28(5): 544-50.
13. Tzeng HM, Yin CY, Grunawalt J. Effective Assessment of Use of Sitters by Nurses in Inpatient Care
Settings. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 64(2): 176-83.
14. Bates DW, Pruess K, Souney P, Platt R. Serious Falls in Hospitalized Patients: Correlates and Resource
Utilization. Am J Med. 1995; 99(2): 137-43.
15. Liang BA. Falls in Older Adults: Assessment and Intervention in Primary Care. Hosp Physician. 2002;
35(4): 55-56.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cost of Falls Among Older Adults. [Web Page]. 2010,
December 8. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/Falls/fallcost.html. Accessed
August 25, 2011.
17. Phillips VL, Yarmo Roberts D, Hunsaker AE. Certified Nursing Aides’ and Care Assistants’ Views on Falls:
Insight for Creation and Implementation of Fall Prevention Programs. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008; 9(3): 168-
72.
18. Wayland L , Holt L, Sewell S, Bird J, Edelman L. Reducing the Patient Fall Rate in a Rural Health
System. J Healthc Qual. 2010; 32(2): 9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.2009.00068.x
19. Tiessen B , Deter C, Snowdon AW, Kolga C. Continuing the Journey to a Culture of Patient Safety: From
Falls Prevention to Falls Management. Healthc Q. 2010; 13(1): 79-83.
9
www.exmonitoring.org 10
20. Hathaway J, Walsh J, Lacey C, Saenger H. Insights Obtained From an Evaluation of a Falls Prevention
Program Set in a Rural Hospital. Aust J Rural Health. 2001; 9(4): 172-7.
21. Race M, Gale J, Coburn A. Provision of Long Term Care Services by Critical Access Hospitals: Are
Things Changing? (Policy Brief #19). Portland, ME: Flex Monitoring Team; March 2011. http://www.
flexmonitoring.org/documents/PolicyBrief19-LTC.pdf
22. Casey M. Critical Access Hospital Quality Improvement Activities and Reporting on Quality Measures:
Results of the 2007 National CAH Survey. (Briefing Paper No. 18). Minneapolis, MN: Flex Monitoring
Team; March 2008. http://flexmonitoring.org/documents/BriefingPaper18_QualityReport2007.pdf
23. Casey M, Moscovice I, Klingner J. Critical Access Hospital Patient Safety Priorities and Initiatives:
Results of the 2004 National CAH Survey. (Briefing Paper No. 3). Minneapolis, MN: Flex Monitoring Team;
September 2004. http://www.flexmonitoring.org/documents/BriefingPaper3_PatientSafety.pdf
24. Casey MWM , Coburn AF, Moscovice I, Loux S. Prioritizing Patient Safety Interventions in Small and
Rural Hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006; 32(12): 693-702.
25. The Joint Commission. Implementation Guide for the NQF Endorsed Nursing-Sensitive Care
Performance Measures. (Version 2.0). Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission; 2009. http://www.
jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/NSC%20Manual.pdf
26. Hitcho EB, Krauss MJ, Birge S, et al. Characteristics and Circumstances of Falls in a Hospital Setting: a
Prospective Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19 (7): 732-9.
27. Titler MG, Shever LL, Kanak MF, Picone DM, Qin R. Factors Associated With Falls During
Hospitalization in an Older Adult Population. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2011; 25(2): 127-48.
28. Tinetti ME, Kumar C. The Patient Who Falls. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association.
2010; 303(3): 258-266. http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/303/3/258.abstract
29. Carroll DL, Dykes PC, Hurley AC. Patients’ Perspectives of Falling While in an Acute Care Hospital and
Suggestions for Prevention. Appl Nurs Res. 2010; 23(4): 238-41.
30. Gray-Miceli D. Preventing falls in acute care. In: Capazuti E, et al., Eds. Evidenc-Based Geriatric
Nursing: Protocols for Best Practice. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2008:161-198.
31. Evans D, Hodgkinson B, Lambert L, Wood J. Falls Risk Factors in the Hospital Setting: a Systematic
Review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2001; 7(1): 38-45.
32. Tzeng HM. Inpatient Falls in Adult Acute Care Settings: Influence of Patients’ Mental Status. J Adv Nurs.
2010; 66(8): 1741-6.
33. Richardson DR, Hicks MJ, Walker RB. Falls in Rural Elders: An Empirical Study of Risk Factors. J Am
Board Fam Pract. 2002; 15(3): 178-182. http://www.jabfm.org/cgi/content/abstract/15/3/178
34. Hartikainen S, Lonnroos E, Louhivuori K. Medication As a Risk Factor for Falls: Critical Systematic
Review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62(10): 1172-81.
35. Rhalimi M, Helou R, Jaecker P. Medication Use and Increased Risk of Falls in Hospitalized Elderly
Patients: a Retrospective, Case-Control Study. Drugs Aging. 2009; 26(10): 847-52.
36. The Joint Commission. Improving fall risk assessment. In: Good Practices in Preventing Patient Falls: A
Collection of Case Studies. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources; 2007:17-29.
37. Papaioannou A, Parkinson W, Cook R, et al. Prediction of Falls Using a Risk Assessment Tool in the
Acute Care Setting. BMC Med. 2004; 2: 1.
www.exmonitoring.org 11
38. Boushon B , Nielsen GA, Quigley P, et al. Transforming Care at the Bedside How-to Guide: Reducing
Patient Injuries From Falls. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2008.
39. Agostini JV, Baker DI, Bogardus STJr. Prevention of Falls in Hospitalized and Institutionalized Older
People. In: Shojania K.G., Duncan BW, McDonald KM, et al., Eds. Making Health Care Safer: A Critical
Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001;
Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 43. http://archive.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/chap26a.htm
40. Connell BR. Role of the Environment in Falls Prevention. Clin Geriatr Med.1996; 12(4):859-80.
41. Donald IP, Pitt K, Armstrong E, Shuttleworth H. Preventing Falls on an Elderly Care Rehabilitation Ward.
Clin Rehabil. 2000; 14(2): 178-85.
42. Alcee D. The Experience of a Community Hospital in Quantifying and Reducing Patient Falls. J Nurs
Care Qual. 2000; 14(3): 43-53.
43. Dacenko-Grawe L, Holm K. Evidence-Based Practice: a Falls Prevention Program That Continues to
Work. Medsurg Nurs. 2008; 17(4): 223-7, 235; quiz 228.
44. Ang E. Patient Falls in Acute Care Inpatient Hospitals: A Portfolio of Research Related to Strategies in
Reducing Falls. Adelaide, South Australia: AU: University of Adelaide; 2008.
45. Morse JM. Enhancing the Safety of Hospitalization by Reducing Patient Falls. Am J Infect Control. 2002;
30(6): 376-80.
46. Morse JM. Preventing Patient Falls. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997.
47. Currie L. Fall and Injury Prevention. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2006; 24: 39-74.
48. Shever LL, Titler MG, Mackin ML, Kueny A. Fall Prevention Practices in Adult Medical-Surgical Nursing
Units Described by Nurse Managers. West J Nurs Res. 2011; 33(3): 385-97.
49. Jones K, Venema D, Nailon R. A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Fall Risk Reduction in Nebraska Critical
Access Hospitals. (Unpublished Pilot Study Report). Omaha, NE: 2011.
50. Oliver D, Daly F, Martin FC, McMurdo ME. Risk Factors and Risk Assessment Tools for Falls in Hospital
in-Patients: a Systematic Review. Age Ageing. 2004; 33 (2): 122-30.
51. Ruddick P , Hannah K, Schade CP, et al. Using Root Cause Analysis to Reduce Falls in Rural Health
Care Facilities. In: Henriksen K., Battles J.B., Keyes M.A., et al., Eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New
Directions and Alternative Approaches. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008;
Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign.
52. Stalhandske E, Mills P, Quigley P, et al. VHAs National Falls Collaborative and Prevention Programs.
In: Henriksen K., Battles J.B., Keyes M.A., et al., Eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and
Alternative Approaches. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008; Vol. 2: Culture
and Redesign. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43724/pdf/advances-stalhandske2_70.pdf
53. Fonda D, Cook J, Sandler V, Bailey M. Sustained Reduction in Serious Fall-Related Injuries in Older
People in Hospital. Med J Aust. 2006; 184(8): 379-82. http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/184_08_170406/
fon10417_fm.pdf
54. Haines TP , Bennell KL, Osborne RH, Hill KD. Effectiveness of Targeted Falls Prevention Programme in
Subacute Hospital Setting: Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ. 2004; 328(7441): 676.
55. Hurley AC , Dykes PC, Carroll DL, Dykes JS, Middleton B. Fall TIP: Validation of Icons to Communicate
Fall Risk Status and Tailored Interventions to Prevent Patient Falls. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 146:
455-9.
www.exmonitoring.org 12
56. Cameron ID, Murray GR, Gillespie LD, et al. Interventions for Preventing Falls in Older People in
Nursing Care Facilities and Hospitals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1): CD005465.
57. Oliver D, Hopper A, Seed P. Do Hospital Fall Prevention Programs Work? A Systematic Review. J Am
Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48(12): 1679-89.
58. Coussement J, De Paepe L, Schwendimann R, et al. Interventions for Preventing Falls in Acute- and
Chronic-Care Hospitals: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56(1): 29-36.
59. Oliver D, Connelly JB, Victor CR, et al. Strategies to Prevent Falls and Fractures in Hospitals and Care
Homes and Effect of Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. BMJ. 2007; 334(7584):
82. http://www.bmj.com/content/334/7584/82.full.pdf
60. Chang JT, Morton SC, Rubenstein LZ, et al. Interventions for the Prevention of Falls in Older Adults:
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials. BMJ. 2004; 328(7441): 680.
61. McInnes E, Askie L. Evidence Review on Older People’s Views and Experiences of Falls Prevention
Strategies. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004; 1(1): 20-37.
62. RAND. Falls Prevention Interventions in the Medicare Population. Evidence Report and Evidence-Based
Recommendations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center; 2003.
http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reprints/2007/RAND_RP1230.sum.pdf
63. American Geriatrics Society. AGS/BGS Clinical Practice Guideline: Prevention of Falls in Older Persons
(2010). [Web Page]. 2010. Available at: http://www.americangeriatrics.org/health_care_professionals/
clinical_prac%20tice/clinical_guidelines_recommendations/2010/. Accessed April 4, 2011.
64. Tinetti ME, Williams CS. The Effect of Falls and Fall Injuries on Functioning in Community-Dwelling
Older Persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998; 53(2): M112-9.
65. Peeters GM, Heymans MW, de Vries OJ, et al. Multifactorial Evaluation and Treatment of Persons With a
High Risk of Recurrent Falling Was Not Cost-Effective. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22(7): 2187-96.
66. de Vries OJ, Peeters GM, Elders PJ, et al. Multifactorial Intervention to Reduce Falls in Older People at
High Risk of Recurrent Falls: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(13): 1110-7.
67. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC. Implementation of Multifactorial Interventions for Fall and Fracture
Prevention. Age Ageing. 2006; 35(suppl 2): ii60-ii64. http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/suppl_2/
ii60.abstract
68. Healey F, Monro A, Cockram A, Adams V, Heseltine D. Using Targeted Risk Factor Reduction to Prevent
Falls in Older in-Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Age Ageing. 2004; 33(4): 390-395. http://ageing.
oxfordjournals.org/content/33/4/390.abstract
69. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Prevention of Hospital Falls: An RWJF National Program. (National
Program Report: HFS). Princeton, NJ: RWJF; May 2010.http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/HFS.final.pdf
70. Bakarich A, McMillan V, Prosser R. The Effect of a Nursing Intervention on the Incidence of Older Patient
Falls. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1997; 15(1): 26-31.
71. Haumschild MJ, Karfonta TL, Haumschild MS, Phillips SE. Clinical and Economic Outcomes of a Fall-
Focused Pharmaceutical Intervention Program. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003; 60(10): 1029-32.
72. Evans D, Wood J, Lambert L. Patient Injury and Physical Restraint Devices: a Systematic Review. J Adv
Nurs. 2003; 41(3): 274-82.
73. Trepanier S. Prevention of Falls and Bed Alarms: The State of the Science. Dallas, TX: Texas Tech
University; 2009.
74. Tideiksaar R, Feiner CF, Maby J. Falls Prevention: the Efficacy of a Bed Alarm System in an Acute-Care
Setting. Mt Sinai J Med. 1993; 60(6): 522-7.
75. Evans D, Wood J, Lambert L. A Review of Physical Restraint Minimization in the Acute and Residential
Care Settings. J Adv Nurs. 2002; 40(6): 616-25.
76. Healey F, Oliver D. Bedrails, Falls and Injury: Evidence or Opinion? A Review of Their Use and Effects.
Nurs Times. 2009; 105(26): 20-4.
77. Healey F, Oliver D, Milne A, Connelly JB. The Effect of Bedrails on Falls and Injury: A Systematic Review
of Clinical Studies. Age Ageing. 2008; 37(4): 368-78.
78. Hadidi N. Interventions for Preventing Falls in Acute and Chronic Care Hospitals: A Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56(9): 1776-7.
79. Montana Rural Healthcare Performance Improvement Network. Reduce Preventable Falls Clinical Study
Baseline Report. Aggregate and Peer Group Results. [Web Page]. 2009. Available at: http://www.mtpin.org/
docs/baseline%20Agg%20Peer%20Falls%20report%200110.doc. Accessed April 28, 2011.
80. Giles LC, Bolch D, Rouvray R, et al. Can Volunteer Companions Prevent Falls Among Inpatients? A
Feasibility Study Using a Pre-Post Comparative Design. BMC Geriatr. 2006; 6: 11.
81. Weber V, White A, McIlvried R. An Electronic Medical Record (EMR)-Based Intervention to Reduce
Polypharmacy and Falls in an Ambulatory Rural Elderly Population. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(4): 399-404.
82. Vassallo M, Vignaraja R, Sharma J, Briggs R, Allen S. Tranquilliser Use As a Risk Factor for Falls in Hospital
Patients. Int J Clin Pract. 2006; 60(5): 549-52.
83. Hanger HC, Ball MC, Wood LA. An Analysis of Falls in the Hospital: Can We Do Without Bedrails? J Am
Geriatr Soc. 1999; 47(5): 529-31.
84. Haines TP, Bell RA, Varghese PN. Pragmatic, Cluster Randomized Trial of a Policy to Introduce Low-Low
Beds to Hospital Wards for the Prevention of Falls and Fall Injuries. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58(3): 435-41.
85. Tzeng H-M , Yin C-Y. Heights of Occupied Patient Beds: a Possible Risk Factor for Inpatient Falls. J Clin
Nurs. 2008; 17(11): 1503-1509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02086.x
86. Mayo NE, Gloutney L, Levy AR. A Randomized Trial of Identification Bracelets to Prevent Falls Among
Patients in a Rehabilitation Hospital. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75(12): 1302-8.
87. Chari S, Haines T, Varghese P, Economidis A. Are Non-Slip Socks Really ‘Non-Slip’? An Analysis of Slip
Resistance. BMC Geriatr. 2009; 9: 39.
88. Schwendimann R, Milisen K, Buhler H, De Geest S. Fall Prevention in a Swiss Acute Care Hospital Setting
Reducing Multiple Falls. J Gerontol Nurs. 2006; 32 (3): 13-22.
www.exmonitoring.org 13
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
14
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
Single Interventions: Physiological
Agency for
Healthcare
Research and
Quality
(AHRQ) &
U.S.
Department of
Veterans
Affairs
Training program (Patient
Safety Improvement Corps)
in West Virginia provided
learning sessions for over
300 health care workers and
development of a state-wide
Falls Prevention
Collaborative to collect and
report falls data.
Not given.
11 hospitals,
2 rural, 6
CAHs
60% decrease in initial
falls, 10% decrease in
repeat falls;
Aggregate decrease of
45% in falls in
Collaborative.
Yes, 6 of
the 11
study
hospitals
were
CAHs.
Ruddick,
2008.51
Aged Care
Services at
Calufield
General
Medical
Centre,
Melbourne,
Australia
QI project to determine if
multi-strategy prevention
approach reduces rate of falls
and injuries. RCA used to
identify systems and
processes contributing to
falls.
Study conducted in four units
of 96-120 beds per unit.
Aged care
service
wards for
acute care,
geriatric
evaluation
and
management
and
restorative
RCA found that 82%
falls not observed; 60%
occurred around the
bed;
19% reduction in falls
per 1000 bed days over
2 year study period.
No
Fonda et al.,
2006.53
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
15
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
care.
2/3rds of
admissions
for elderly
patients
were acute
and
unplanned
Princess
Margaret
Hospital,
Christchurch,
New Zealand
Prospective “before & after”
study. Intervention included
educational training on
restricting the use of bedrails.
Study undertaken in five
wards of 25-30 beds each,
with a total of 135 beds.
Rehabili-
tation unit
for older
adults. No
demographic
information
provided
Falls reduced from 30%
to 11% post-
intervention;
Reduction in number of
beds without bedrails
after policy was
introduced, but fall rate
did not change
significantly.
No
Hanger, Ball
& Wood,
1999.83
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
16
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
Aventis
Pharmaceuticals
Retrospective Study in an
urban rehabilitation center.
Fall-focused pharmaceutical
intervention plan to
determine whether there is an
association between falls
among the elderly and
specific medication classes.
Intervention used the
American Society of
Consultant Pharmacists
MDS- MedGuide and
included complete review of
all medications by a
consultant pharmacist
Patients > 65
had 1 year
stay for
diagnoses of
orthopedic,
respiratory,
neurology,
infection or
cardio-
vascular
issues.
47% reduction in the
number of patient falls
post-intervention.
Use of medications
decreased post-
intervention:
cardiovascular
analgesic
psychoactive
sedatives &
hypnotics
Number of patient falls
decreased as use of
medications decreased.
No
Haumschild et
al., 2003.71
Geisinger
Health Systems
(GHS).
GHS serves a
40-county area
Prospective randomized
study to evaluate an
Electronic Medical Record
(EMR)-based intervention to
reduce polypharmacy and
falls. Falls data obtained from
620 patients
aged > 70, 4
or more
active
prescriptions
and 1or
No change in overall
number of medications;
Negative association
between new
medication starts and
No
Weber et al.,
2007.81
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
17
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
of over 2.5
million persons
in largely rural
and north-
eastern
Pennsylvania
inpatient hospitalizations, ED
visits, outpatient visits, and
self-reported falls.
Intervention: clinical
pharmacist reviewed
patients’ medication record
and sent message via EMR
alerting PCP to fall risk.
more
psycho-
active
medications.
number of psychoactive
medications
Reduced risk for fall-
related diagnoses.
Royal
Bournemouth
Hospital,
United
Kingdom
Prospective observational
study of 1025 patients
admitted to 3 general
rehabilitation units in a non-
acute geriatric hospital. Aim
of study was to identify
associations of tranquilizer
use (benzodiazapine or
antipsychotic medications)
and risk of fall in confused
and nonconfused patients
Rehabili-
tation
hospital,
elderly
patients
aged > 80
Confused patients and
patients on tranquilizers
were more likely to fall;
Confused patients on
tranquilizers more
likely to have recurrent
falls.
No
Vassallo et al.,
2006.82
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
18
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
Flinders
Medical
Centre, South
Australia
Pre-post test, 450-bed urban
teaching hospital.
Intervention group were
provided toileting assistance
every 2 hours (whether or not
they indicated a need).
Intervention
group:
Patients
admitted to
the medical
or surgical
wards over
the age of
70 with
confusion
and mobility
problems
16% falls in the
intervention group;
84% falls in the control
group;
53% fewer falls during
shifts in which risk
assessment and toileting
intervention was used.
No
Bakarich,
McMillan &
Prosser,
1997.70
University of
Michigan,
School of
Nursing
Qualitative study in a
community hospital to
determine prevalence of
inpatient falls associated with
toileting. Study used content
analysis of incident reports.
Suburban hospital with 109
medical beds; 53 surgical
beds, and 34 med-surg beds
Adult
patients,
with mean
age of 75.59
(78.2% aged
65 or older)
42.2% falls related to
toileting, with the most
common occurring on
the way from the bed
or chair to the
bathroom;
58.3% falls occurred
on the medical units;
Author recommends
No
Tzeng, 2010.6
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
19
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
(combined unit).
training and promotion
of safe patient
transfers.
Single Interventions: Environmental
Allied Health
Clinical
Research Unit,
Australia
Pragmatic, matched cluster
randomized trial in 18 public
hospital wards. Intervention:
1 low-rise bed provided for
every 12 beds on a ward,
with written instructions for
identifying patients at
greatest risk for falls.
Study wards included acute
medical, rehabilitation and
orthopedic.
Intervention
population
included
patients with
neurological
impairment
(Parkinson’s
disease or
dementia) or
impulsive
behavior
(especially
the tendency
to mobilize
without
needed
No significant
difference in fall-
related outcomes
between the 2 groups.
No
Haines, et al.,
2010.84
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
20
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
assistance)
University of
Michigan,
School of
Nursing
Intervention: Bed height
measurements taken at
regular intervals to determine
relationship between staff
working height for patient
beds, time, and whether
patients were on falls
precaution.
Study conducted in a 32-bed
acute medical ward.
Patient
demo-
graphics not
given.
Average bed height
was significantly
higher for patients on
fall precautions than
for those not on
precautions,
suggesting that
nursing staff may be
consciously or
unconsciously keeping
the beds in a higher
position as a passive
restraint and so that
patients will have to
use the call bell to get
out of bed.
No
Tzeng, 2008.85
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
21
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
Gloucestershire
Royal Hospital,
United
Kingdom
Comparison of two flooring
types in the bed areas for falls
avoidance. Intervention:
randomized group of patients
assigned to ward with
carpeting.
Study conducted in a 28 bed
elderly care ward in a com-
munity hospital.
Patients
aged >80
years.
n=54;
44 female,
9 with
severe
confusion,
10 with fall
on
admission,
20 with
stroke on
admission.
Rate of falls:
Carpet: 63%
(n=10)
Vinyl: 6% (n=1).
Use of carpeted
flooring at bedside did
not lead to reduced
incidence of falls.
Unsure
Donald et al.,
2000.41
Royal Victoria
Hospital,
Quebec,
Canada
Randomized Controlled Trial
conducted in a rehabilitation
hospital. Intervention:
Colored identification
wristbands given to
randomized group of patients
Patients aged
> 80 years,
with 1 or
more risk
factors for
falls or for
41% (n=27) in the
intervention group vs.
30% (n=20) in the
control group fell at
least once, suggesting
that colored
No
Mayo et al.,
1994.86
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
22
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
at high risk for falls.
fractures.
Admitting
diagnosis of
stroke or
ataxia,
history of
multiple falls,
or
incontinence.
wristbands as the sole
intervention was of no
benefit in preventing
falls.
Princess
Alexandra
Hospital
Physiotherapy
Gait
Laboratory,
Queensland
Health,
Australia
Two-phase testing of
compression socks and non-
slip footwear marketed for
use in hospitals.
Phase I: laboratory testing
Phase II: in-situ testing on
healthy adults
Phase II
patients
aged 29-31.
Age of study
participant
noted as a
limitation
since many
hospitalized
patients are
older and
Non-slip socks
performed varied in
traction performance,
with barefoot
conditions
consistently resulting
in the highest levels of
traction, suggesting
that non-slip socks are
not an adequate
alternative to well-
fitting rubber-soled
No
Chari et al,
2009.87
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
23
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
more frail.
footwear or bare feet.
The author also notes
that poorly fitting
socks or misaligned
socks could constitute
a fall hazard and that
cognitively impaired
patients need attention
of nursing staff for
proper alignment of
socks. Thus the risks
outweigh the minimal
benefit of non-slip
footwear.
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
24
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
Multifactorial Intervention
Wise Regional
Health System,
Texas.
Study
conducted in
the 148-bed
facility, which
until 2004 was
a 50-bed
facility
Review of data to determine
quality indicators for
identification of high fall risk
patients. Evaluation and
improvement process
included creating a statistical
demographic profile of the
patient and implementing fall
prevention tools:
toileting rounds,
verbal reports at shift
change,
staff training and
education,
involvement of patient
and family,
increased caregiver
involvement, signage
throughout the hospital.
Review of
data included
patients aged
<33 to 93
with patients
aged 59-60
experiencing
the highest
number of
falls, a high
Braden Scale
score, and a
Fall Risk
Score of 10-
13 on the
Hendrich II
Fall Risk
Assessment.
Patient falls decreased
from 4.37 to 0 falls
per 1,000 patient days
in the 3 month study
period.
Yes
Wayland et
al., 2010.18
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
25
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
Northern
Rivers Area
Health Service,
New South
Wales
Evaluation of effectiveness of
Falls Prevention Program
which included:
Falls Prevention
Assessment Form;
Non-slip mat
Call bell and assistive
devices within reach
Education & training of
nursing staff, patients
and families
Environmental assessments
Patients
aged 65 or
older who
were
admitted to
the general
(med-surg)
ward.
High risk
patients
identified by
colored
armband and
dot on
chart/care
plan, given
full
supervision,
non-slip
mats,
bedrails as
Reduced the incidence
of falls (percentage
not given) and was
found to be effective
for those patients
requiring minimal
assistance with
walking.
However, it was less
effective for those
using pick-up frames
or forearm support
frames.
Yes
Hathaway et
al., 2001.20
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
26
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
deemed
necessary,
bed alarms
and paging
systems.
Evanston
Hospital,
Evanston,
Illinois
Fall Prevention Protocol
developed by 325 bed
hospital which included
risk assessment at
shift changes,
hourly rounding,
staff, patient, and
family education,
alarms,
nonskid footwear,
toileting regimens,
signage
Patients
aged > 65
years,
accounting
for 12.5% of
inpatient
admissions
and 70%
inpatient
falls.
Annual decline in falls
from 4.04 to 2.27 per
1000 patient days.
Results attributed to
adherence and
updating of Fall
Prevention Protocol
(adding nursing
interventions in
response to quarterly
fall data) and
communication to all
hospital staff.
No
Dacenko-
Grawe,
2008.43
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
27
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
Tucson
Medical
Center, Tucson,
Arizona
Evaluation of the Fall
Prevention Protocol (FPP) in
a 550-bed acute care facility.
FPP included:
Fall definition
Fall assessment
Communication
(including signage)
Education (including in-
services, post-fall
assessment skills
workshops, reporting and
reviewing falls data on
the hospital intranet)
Interventions: non-skid
footwear, toileting
regimen, limited use of
restraints
Phase I: Hospital-wide
education stressing
Patient
demo-
graphics not
given.
Fall risk
assessed at
admission
and shift
changes.
Average number of
hospital falls during the
3-year study period:
4 per 1,000 patient days
44% falls identified as
preventable
37% falls related to
toileting needs.
No
McCarter-
Bayer, 2005.5
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
28
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
identification of patients at
risk for falls, the use of the
FPP, and correct completion
of the FPP reporting tool.
Phase II: Staff training to
distinguish between
preventable and non-
preventable falls and creating
strategies for post-fall
assessments.
Phase III: Staff education
focused on using clinically
relevant patient info to
implement fall prevention
strategies specific to
individual nursing units.
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
29
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
National
Patient Safety
Agency, United
Kingdom
Randomized controlled trial.
Intervention: Targeted care
plan including falls risk
assessment and their related
interventions in the form of a
pre-printed care plan.
Targeted intervention
options:
Medication review
Orthostatic blood pressure
Eyesight check
Mobility assistance
Environmental check:
bedrails, footwear, bed
height, position in ward
(e.g. moving closer to
nursing station),
environmental cause of
fall, call bell within
reach).
Patients
aged > 75
years.
Population
served by
this health
agency
included
rural
residents
6 months post-
intervention:
30% reduction in risk of
falls;
No significant
difference between
groups in overall effect
on injury rate.
No
Healey et al.,
2004.68
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
30
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
Victorian
Department of
Human
Services,
Australia
Randomized controlled trial
in a metropolitan hospital,
sub-acute ward. Intervention
included:
Falls risk alert card
(placed above the
patient’s bed) with
information brochure
for families and
patients;
Tailored exercise
program
Education sessions
(30 min, twice
weekly)
Hip protectors
626 patients
aged 38-99,
with average
age = 80
years.
Intervention group
experienced 30% fewer
falls than control group
and 28% reduction of
falls with injury
This randomized
controlled trial showed
that the incidence of
falls in hospitalized
elderly patients can be
reduced, providing
valuable evidence for
hospital administrators
and practitioners of
subacute hospitals
where falls are a
common and dangerous
occurance.
No
Haines et al.,
2004.54
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
31
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
University of
Adelaide,
South Australia
Randomized control trial in
eight medical wards ranging
from 17-45 beds in a
Singapore hospital to
determine the effectiveness
of a targeted multiple
intervention strategy to
reduce the number of falls in
an acute care inpatient
hospital. Intervention group
received the usual universal
multiple interventions
(colored wristband; alert card
on patient’s headboard; call
bell within reach; low bed
position; bed side rails raised;
reassessment at every shift)
as well as 30 minute
education session on fall risk
and specific interventions
based on their individual risk
Patients
admitted for
medical
conditions
including
cardiac,
respiratory,
renal,
oncology,
gastro-
enterology,
and
endocrine
issues. Also
had a score
of > 5 on the
Hendrich II
Fall Risk
Assessment
The use of targeted
multiple interventions
reduced the risk of
falling to about 29% of
the risk in usual fall
prevention
interventions.
The proportion of high-
risk patients who fell in
the intervention group
(0.4%) was
significantly lower
compared with the
control group (1.5%).
No
Ang, 2008.44
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
32
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
factors of:
Confusion: Use of
sitters
Symptomatic
Depression: Refer to
doctor
Incontinence:
Medication review;
Toileting regimen;
Patient/family
education
Dizziness/vertigo:
Review recent labs;
check blood pressure
for postural
hypotension; refer to
doctor; patient
education
Medications related
to fall risk
(anitepileptics,
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
33
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
benzodiazapines,
diuretics): Patient
education on
medication and fall
risk; instruction to
call for assistance on
toileting, bathing,
and mobility
Difficulty with mobility:
Review recent labs; Instruct
patient to use assistive
devices; refer to PT
University
Hospital of
Basel,
Switzerland
Intervention conducted in
two hospital units consisting
of 22 beds each:
Training staff in use of
Morse Fall Scale
Implementation of 15
selected preventive
interventions
Internal
Medicine
patients with
a mean age
of 70.3 and
a mean
length of
stay of 11.3
days.
Intervention program
showed effect in
preventing multiple falls
but not first falls.
Proportion of patients
with first falls:
Intervention: 20%
Control: 56%
No
Schwendimann
et al., 2006.88
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
34
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
1. Identification of
Physical Deficit
2. Identification of Mental
Deficit
3. Patient Education
4. Placement of call bell,
lights, & personal
articles within reach
5. Bed height
6. Stabilization of furniture
7. Obstacles cleared from
pathways
8. Safe footwear
9. Nursing assistance with
transfer and ambulation
10. Toileting assistance
11. Assistive devices used
properly
12. Exercise
13. Monitoring confused
patients
Number of Falls
Intervention: 31
Control: 51
Falls per 1,000 patient
days:
Intervention: 11.5
Control: 15.7
(not statistically
significant)
* Arranged by Single Interventions (Physiological, Environmental) and Multifactorial Interventions.
Studies that included CAHs or small rural hospitals are listed first within the category.
35
Table 2. Evidence-based Falls Prevention Strategies*
Sponsoring
Organization
Program Description
Patient
Population
Results
Inclusion
of CAHs
or small
rural
hospitals
Citations
14. Medication review
15. Colored signage
indicating high fall risk
(on chart & above bed)
... Accordingly, injuries resulting from STFs are costly for both patients and hospitals [9][10][11]. It is projected that these patients receive 60% higher total care than other hospitalized patients [12,13]. However, the overall burden of fall incidents seems to be significantly *Email: dr.injukim@gmail.com ...
... The hospital fall incidence is a persistent crisis and is often instigated by a mixture of multi-hazard issues that are explicit to patients' physical conditions (inherent features) and hospital environments (extrinsic features) [13,40]. Identifying those hazardous factors seems to be useful to exploit preclusion plans for hospital fall incidents. ...
Article
Full-text available
Fall incidents are a leading safety apprehension in the hospital industry. Whereas roughening the floor surface can reduce fall risks, there remains unanswered controversies between achieving and maintaining hygienic cleaning efficiencies and adequately addressing conditions of flooring safety. Thus, the current study critically overviews the status of research and accepted practices on hospital flooring safety and healthy controls. Salient literature was identified by searching keywords and phrases within the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and ScienceDirect to find answers for the major questions on hospital floorings. A comprehensive review analysis identified that underlying causes of hospital fall incidents and flooring attributable infectious illnesses were mainly comprised by floor types and materials, cleaning chemicals, materials and methods, maintenance, and slip resistance properties. Findings from this study suggest several major actions to advance hospital flooring safety and health research and practice.
... Falls can be costly, leading to increased treatment and extended hospital stays, usually resulting in 60% higher medical expenses. This issue is especially relevant in both hospital and home care settings, where achieving effective fall prevention strategies is difficult due to the lack of resources and staff education [2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study introduces an ensemble model designed for real-time monitoring of bedridden patients. The model was developed using a unique dataset, specifically acquired for this study, that captures six typical movements. The dataset was balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique, resulting in a diverse distribution of movement types. Three models were evaluated: a Decision Tree Regressor, a Gradient Boosting Regressor, and a Bagging Regressor. The Decision Tree Regressor achieved an accuracy of 0.892 and an R² score of 1.0 on the training dataset, and 0.939 on the test dataset. The Boosting Regressor achieved an accuracy of 0.908 and an R² score of 0.99 on the training dataset, and 0.943 on the test dataset. The Bagging Regressor was selected due to its superior performance and trade-offs such as computational cost and scalability. It achieved an accuracy of 0.950, an R² score of 0.996 for the training data, and an R² score of 0.959 for the test data. This study also employs K-Fold cross-validation and learning curves to validate the robustness of the Bagging Regressor model. The proposed system addresses practical implementation challenges in real-time monitoring, such as data latency and false positives/negatives, and is designed for seamless integration with hospital IT infrastructure. This research demonstrates the potential of machine learning to enhance patient safety in healthcare settings.
... Falls can be costly, leading to increased treatment and extended hospital stays, usually resulting in 60% higher medical expenses. This issue is especially relevant in both hospital and home care settings, where achieving effective fall prevention strategies is difficult due to the lack of resources and staff education [2]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This study introduces an ensemble model designed for real-time monitoring of bedridden patients.The model was developed using a unique dataset, specifically acquired for this study, that captures six typical movements. The dataset was balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique, resulting in a diverse distribution of movement types. Three models were evaluated: a Decision Tree Regressor, a Gradient Boosting Regressor, and a Bagging Regressor. The Decision Tree Regressor achieved an accuracy of 0.892 and an R2 score of 1.0 on the training dataset, and 0.939 on the test dataset. The Boosting Regressor achieved an accuracy of 0.908 and an R2 score of 0.99 on the training dataset, and 0.943 on the test dataset. The Bagging Regressor was selected due to its superior performance and trade-offs such as computational cost and scalability. It achieved an accuracy of 0.950, an R2 score of 0.996 for the training data, and an R2 score of 0.959 for the test data. The study also employs K-Fold cross-validation and learning curves to validate the robustness of the Bagging Regressor model. The proposed system addresses practical implementation challenges in real-time monitoring, such as data latency and false positives/negatives, and is designed for seamless integration with hospital IT infrastructure. This research demonstrates the potential of machine learning to enhance patient safety in healthcare settings.
... Falls can be costly as well, leading to increased treatment and extended hospital stays, usually resulting in 60% higher medical expenses. This issue is especially relevant in both hospital and home care settings, where achieving effective fall prevention strategies is difficult due to lack of resources and staff education [2]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This research presents an ensemble model developed to enhance the safety of bedridden patients in healthcare settings. The model utilizes a unique dataset capturing six typical movements performed by patients laying in bed, such as rolling over, falling off the bed, etc. The aim is to automate the classification of these movements, thereby enabling real-time monitoring of patients without the constant presence of hospital personnel in the room, a common practice in current healthcare settings. The dataset is preprocessed and balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique, and then split into training and test sets for model training and evaluation. Three different models are explored: a Decision Tree Regressor, a Gradient Boosting Regressor, and a Bagging Regressor. The Bagging Regressor is an ensemble model that utilizes the Decision Tree Regressor as its base regressor. Each model’s performance is evaluated using accuracy, R2 score, and Mean Squared Error on both the training and test sets. The ensemble model demonstrates promising results, indicating the potential of machine learning to improve patient safety in healthcare settings. The study also employs K-Fold cross-validation and learning curves to validate the robustness of the ensemble model. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the application of machine learning in healthcare and opens up new avenues for improving patient safety through real-time monitoring and classification of patient movements.
... Weighing benefit versus harm, national guidelines, toolkits, and population-based programs have recommended the use of hipprotective clothing as an injury reduction intervention to reduce hip fracture risk. Hip-protective clothing absorbs trauma and reduces hip fracture risk and should be included in injury prevention programs [14][15][16]. ...
... Dear editor, According to World Health Organization data, published in 2016, among the 33 million disabilities reported thus far, 17 million originate from confirmed cases of stroke. Generally, all ataxic patients lose their balance functions after a stroke, increasing the risk of falling [1]. This risk hinders advanced rehabilitation training and theories [2]. ...
Article
Nerve injury after stroke usually weakens the trunk muscle strength (TMS) and balance function, which increases the risk of falling and affects the Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Thus a novel fall prevention device is proposed to reinforce the TMS and retrain the sense of trunk position. Firstly, the structure of the fall prevention device for protection is introduced, the forward and inverse kinematic models are calculated. Then, the kinetic equation of the system based on the Lagrange function are derived out, the structural parameters incorporated into the structural dynamic model include those related to the feedback force in a given motion trajectory of trunk. Lastly, the numerical simulation using the MATLAB is carried out to study the influence of those parameters. It is found that both the length of link and the stiffness of spring have strong influence on the feedback force during gait training. Global optimization of these structural parameters is carried out to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed method for the forming of force field of the system.
Article
Falls present a major challenge for health care systems: they correlate with poor patient outcomes, extend the length of hospitalization, and increase overall medical expenditure. According to existing literature, risk factors for the occurrence of falls include the male gender, urinary incontinence, muscle weakness, agitation or confusion, and dementia. Studies have shown that the combined practice of identifying risk factors and implementing appropriate fall prevention interventions leads to a reduction in the incidence of falls among hospital patients. As the largest group of health professionals committed to providing high-quality care, nurses play an important role in preventing falls among patient populations. In order to prevent falls and maintain patient safety, it is important to identify the most effective strategies for fall prevention. This study presents an overview of previously published strategies and intervention practices on fall prevention in hospital settings around the world. The most common interventions include fall risk assessment, environment/equipment modifications, patient education/family education on fall prevention interventions, staff education on fall reporting and fall prevention, fall risk alerts, medication management, physical fitness of patients, assistance with transfer and toileting and effective team communication and leadership. Ultimately, it is incumbent upon nurses, other health-care professionals and the entire hospital system to develop effective strategies in order to prevent falls among hospitalised patients.
Article
Nerve injury after stroke leads to the disorders of locomotion and declining balance function, which enhances the risk of falling. Restriction of pelvic motions can hinder successful rehabilitation, hence a Robotic Assisted Rehabilitation Trainer (RART) is proposed to assist patients to control the pelvic motions via force field. The mechanical design, kinetic framework and the intention-based controller of the RART are introduced in this paper. Based on an intention-based control strategy, the robot generates force field that affects the pelvic motions (vertical and lateral motion, rotation and obliquity) via a compliant pelvic brace while the patient walking on ground. Control experiment with sixteen hemiplegic patients was carried out to examine the effects on recovery of balance function. Clinical evaluations and gait analysis were performed before and after the treatment. The experiment results show that the proposed control method is effective in motion recognition, and significant improvements of balance function, gait speed, stride, stride frequency, Fugl-Meyer assessment, peak knee and hip flexion angle during swing phase for their affected side are observed in the comparisons within the RART group. These preliminary results demonstrate that the proposed robot with force field and visual feedback may be an effective intervention to improve balance function.
Chapter
Among nurse-sensitive outcome indicators, there are “patient falls” and “pressure ulcers.” Some private institutions such as the National Quality Forum consider fundamental also the measure of “restraint prevalence.” So, pressure sores (and device-related pressure ulcers), patient falls, and resorting to physical restraints (with related injuries) can be all collected under an idea that overcomes the generic “iatrogenic complications” concept, to embrace the more appropriate definition of “nursing-induced complications,” originating a new terminology: “hospital-acquired injuries (HAInj).” The cross trajectories of device-related pressure ulcers, falls, and physical restraints should be traced, and their cause-effect relationships need to be explored and faced by the nursing staff in critical care settings. In fact, it’s intuitive to draw a bidirectional vicious circle involving patient’s agitation, physical restraints, device pressure ulcer, and falls from ICU beds. More research is needed to find effective measure in prevention of falls from bed and chairs, alternative intervention to physical restraints, and optimal management of medical device to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers induced by their application.
Article
Full-text available
Falls cause injury and death for persons of all ages, but risk of falls increases markedly with age. Hospitalization further increases risk, yet no evidence exists to support short-stay hospital-based fall prevention strategies to reduce patient falls. To investigate whether a fall prevention tool kit (FPTK) using health information technology (HIT) decreases patient falls in hospitals. Cluster randomized study conducted January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2009, comparing patient fall rates in 4 urban US hospitals in units that received usual care (4 units and 5104 patients) or the intervention (4 units and 5160 patients). The FPTK integrated existing communication and workflow patterns into the HIT application. Based on a valid fall risk assessment scale completed by a nurse, the FPTK software tailored fall prevention interventions to address patients' specific determinants of fall risk. The FPTK produced bed posters composed of brief text with an accompanying icon, patient education handouts, and plans of care, all communicating patient-specific alerts to key stakeholders. The primary outcome was patient falls per 1000 patient-days adjusted for site and patient care unit. A secondary outcome was fall-related injuries. During the 6-month intervention period, the number of patients with falls differed between control (n = 87) and intervention (n = 67) units (P=.02). Site-adjusted fall rates were significantly higher in control units (4.18 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.45-5.06] per 1000 patient-days) than in intervention units (3.15 [95% CI, 2.54-3.90] per 1000 patient-days; P = .04). The FPTK was found to be particularly effective with patients aged 65 years or older (adjusted rate difference, 2.08 [95% CI, 0.61-3.56] per 1000 patient-days; P = .003). No significant effect was noted in fall-related injuries. The use of a fall prevention tool kit in hospital units compared with usual care significantly reduced rate of falls. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00675935.
Article
Full-text available
This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of multifactorial evaluation and treatment of fall risk factors in community-dwelling older persons at high risk of falling. The intervention and usual care groups did not differ in fall risk or costs. The multifactorial approach was not cost-effective compared to usual care in this group. International guidelines recommend multifactorial evaluation and tailored treatment of risk factors to reduce falling in older persons. The cost-effectiveness may be enhanced in high-risk persons. Our study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of multifactorial evaluation and treatment of fall risk factors in community-dwelling older persons at high risk of recurrent falling. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial. Participants (≥65 years) with a high risk of recurrent falling were randomised into an intervention (n = 106) and usual care group (n = 111). The intervention consisted of multifactorial assessment and treatment of fall risk factors. Clinical outcomes were proportions of fallers and utility during 1 year. Costs were measured using questionnaires at 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline and valued using cost prices, if available, and guideline prices. Differences in costs and cost-effectiveness were analysed using bootstrapping. Cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves were presented. During 1 year, 52% and 56% of intervention and usual care participants reported at least one fall, respectively. The clinical outcome measures did not differ between the two groups. The mean costs were Euro 7,740 (SD 9,129) in the intervention group and Euro 6,838 (SD 8,623) in the usual care group (mean difference Euro 902, bootstrapped 95% CI: -1,534 to 3,357). Cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves indicated that multifactorial evaluation and treatment of fall risk factors was not cost-effective compared with usual care. Multifactorial evaluation and treatment of persons with a high risk of recurrent falling was not cost-effective compared to usual care.
Article
Full-text available
Falls occur frequently in older people and strongly affect quality of life. Guidelines recommend multifactorial, targeted fall prevention. We evaluated the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention in older persons with a high risk of recurrent falls. A randomized controlled trial was conducted from April 3, 2005, to July 21, 2008, at the geriatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital and regional general practices in the Netherlands. Of 2015 persons identified, 217 persons aged 65 years or older were selected to participate. They had a high risk of recurrent falls and no cognitive impairment and had visited the emergency department or their family physician after a fall. The geriatric assessment and intervention were aimed at reduction of fall risk factors. Primary outcome measures were time to first and second falls after randomization. Secondary outcome measures were fractures, activities of daily living, quality of life, and physical performance. Within 1 year, 55 (51.9%) of the 106 intervention participants and 62 (55.9%) of the 111 usual care (control) participants fell at least once. No significant treatment effect was demonstrated for the time to first fall (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.37) or the time to second fall (1.13; 0.71-1.80). Similar results were obtained for secondary outcome measures and for per-protocol analysis. One intervention participant died vs 7 in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.21). This multifactorial fall-prevention program does not reduce falls in high-risk, cognitively intact older persons. Trial Registration isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN11546541.
Article
Full-text available
To provide strategies to assist healthcare professionals in the area of rehabilitation to improve prevention of falls. A conceptual framework is described as a foundation for the proposal of 2 intertwined strategies, of intervention and implementation, which target the questions: Which strategies for intervention represent the current best evidence? and: How can these strategies be implemented and continuously developed? Strategies for multifactorial and multiprofessional fall preventive interventions are presented in terms of a "fall prevention pyramid model", including general, individualized, and acute interventions. A systematic global fall risk rating by the staff is recommended as an initial procedure. Fall event recording and follow-up are stressed as important components of local learning and safety improvement. Development of implementation strategies in 3 phases, focusing on interaction, facilitation and organizational culture, is described. A well-developed patient safety culture focusing on prevention of falls will, when successfully achieved, be seen by staff, patients and their significant others as being characteristic of the organization, and will be evident in attitudes, routines and actions. Moreover, it provides potential for positive side-effects concerning organizational and clinical improvements in additional areas.
Article
Several preventive strategies have proven effective at reducing the occurrence and rate of falling. It remains to be determined, however, whether, and to what extent, falls and/or fall injuries are independent determinants of adverse functional outcomes in older persons. A probability sample of 1,103 community-dwelling persons over age 71 years was followed for 3 years. The 957 cohort members (87%) who participated in at least one follow-up interview while residing in the community were included in this study. Outcome measures included one and three year change in basic and instrumental activities of daily living (BADLs-IADLs), social activities, and physical activities. Based on daily calendars and hospital surveillance, participants were placed into one of four levels of fall status: no falls, one fall without serious injury, at least two falls without serious injury, and one or more falls with serious injury. Hierarchical linear regression models, sequentially adding six domains of covariates, were constructed to examine fall status as a risk factor for change in function. One noninjurious fall (beta = -.437; p < .01), at least two noninjurious falls (beta = -.877; p < .001); and at least one injurious fall (beta = -1.254; p < .001) were each associated with decline in BADL-IADL function over 3 years after adjusting for covariates (model R2 = .2617). Experiencing two or more noninjurious falls (beta = -.538; p < .05) was associated with decline in social activities (model R2 = .2779) while experiencing at least one injurious fall (beta = -.580; p < .01) was associated with decline in physical activity (model R2 = .4231). Falls and fall injuries appear to be independent determinants of functional decline in community-dwelling older persons. Falling is a health condition meeting all criteria for prevention: high frequency, evidence of preventability, and high burden of morbidity.
Chapter
Falls and related injuries are an important issue across the care continuum. National efforts in the community via Healthy People 2010, in the acute care setting via the Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals, and in the long-term care setting via the Nursing Home Quality Initiative project have the potential to significantly reduce falls and related injuries. The growing number of randomized controlled trials related to fall-prevention efforts is promising. However, most of these studies have been carried out in the community and long-term care environments, with few randomized controlled trials evaluating fall- and injury-prevention measures in the acute care setting. As with other nursing-sensitive quality indicators, recent research demonstrating an association between fall rates and nurse staffing ratios needs to be more fully explored. In addition, further research needs to explore automated methods of assessing and communicating fall risk, better methods for risk identification, and the identification of prevention measures. Indeed, with coordinated efforts to apply the evidence to practice, the problem of falls might be managed more effectively.
Article
To evaluate the efficacy of a policy to introduce low-low beds for the prevention of falls and fall injuries on wards that had not previously accessed low-low beds. This was a pragmatic, matched, cluster randomized trial with wards paired according to rate of falls. Intervention and control wards were observed for a 6-month period after implementation of the low-low beds on the intervention wards. Data from a 6-month period before this were also collected and included in analyses to ensure comparability between intervention and control group wards. Public hospitals located in Queensland, Australia. Patients of 18 public hospital wards. Provision of one low-low bed for every 12 on a hospital ward, with written guidance for identifying patients at greatest risk of falls. Falls and fall injuries in the hospital measured using a computerized incident reporting system. There were 10,937 admissions to control and intervention wards combined during the pre-intervention period. There was no significant difference in the rate of falls per 1,000 occupied bed days between intervention and control group wards after the introduction of the low-low beds (generalized estimating equation coefficient=0.23, 95% confidence interval=-0.18-0.65, P=.28). The rate of bed falls, falls resulting in injury, and falls resulting in fracture also did not differ between groups. Some difficulties were encountered in intervention group wards in using the low-low beds as directed. A policy for the introduction of low-low beds did not appear to reduce falls or falls with injury, although larger studies would be required to determine their effect on fall-related fractures.
Article
In healthcare facilities, patient falls have been a major contributing factor associated with patient injuries that result in increased costs and increased length of stay. Recent actions by the Department of Health and Human Services, enacted through the Department of Medicare and Medicaid Services, now hold healthcare facilities financially responsible for injury to patients that result from falls (CMS Hospital Acquired Conditions). Because of these rulings, costs associated with patient falls are now a greater threat to the survival of rural healthcare facilities. The rate of patient falls at Wise Regional Health System was unacceptably high. As a result of statistically analyzing the demographics of previous fall victims, and initiating additional interventions for identified patients, Wise Regional Health System has been successful in drastically decreasing their inpatient fall rate.
Article
This article documents the change management process undertaken in a small community hospital on one stage of the journey toward a patient safety culture. On this part of the journey, the patient care model founded on a philosophy of falls prevention was transformed to one based on a model of falls management. The change process culminated in a more elder-friendly environment complemented by a respect for patients' choices, even when those choices include personal risk. Our cultural transformation resulted in a patient safety culture characterized by (1) a restraints-free physical environment and (2) a rate of patient falls accompanied by serious harm that is lower than the industry average. The first step on our journey to a culture of patient safety was completed over a three-year period.
Article
This article examines the evidence on the effect of bedrails on falls and injury, based on a recent systematic literature review. It also discusses why so many opinion pieces on bedrails adopt an extremely negative perspective. Patients' opinions on bedrails, ethical considerations and implications for practice are also explored.