Article

Electromyographic and Kinetic Comparison of the Back Squat and Overhead Squat

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare muscle activity and kinetics during the back squat and overhead squat performed at three relative intensities (60, 75 and 90% 3RM). Fourteen subjects (age: 26 ± 7 yrs, height: 182.5 ± 13.5 cm, body mass: 90.5 ± 17.5 kg) performed each exercise using a within-subjects crossover design. In addition, a selection of trunk isolation exercises were included to provide additional comparisons. Squats were performed on a force platform with electromyographic (EMG) activity of the anterior deltoid (AD), rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (GM), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF), and lateral gastrocnemius (GA) recorded throughout. The overhead squat demonstrated significantly greater (p<0.05) activity in the anterior trunk muscles (RA and EO) during the eccentric phase. However, the magnitudes of the differences were relatively small (∼ 2 to 7%). In contrast, the back squat displayed significantly greater (p<0.05) activity in the posterior aspect of the trunk (ES) and all lower-body muscles during the concentric phase. Kinetic comparisons revealed that significantly greater peak force (p<0.05) was developed during the back squat. EMG comparisons between the trunk isolation exercises and squat variations demonstrated substantially greater anterior trunk activity during the isolation exercises, whereas the highest activity in the posterior aspect of the trunk was obtained during the squats (p<0.05). The results of the study do not support the hypothesis that the overhead squat provides a substantially greater stimulus for developing the trunk musculature compared with the back squat.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... The literature studies on muscle activation using EMG were commonly performed using different types of exercises named eccentric or concentric (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;Bird et al., 2006;Comfort et al., 2011;Escamilla et al., 2006;Youdas et al., 2008), and with load or without load (Bautista et al., 2020;Lawrence & Carlson, 2015) on different muscle groups. The present study is the first one to compare the RA muscle activity using EMG for the KTB and STB movements performed in different manners with oscillating and without oscillating. ...
... They reported that greater abdominal muscle activity was produced in thigh unsupported exercise than supported exercise. In another study, Chan et al. (2020) evaluated abdominal muscle activity using the sahrmann five-level core stability test reported that abdominal muscle activity was higher when heels did not contact the ground in levels 3 and 5. Aspe and Swinton, (2014) compared the muscle activity between the back and overhead squat with different intensities. Besides they compared muscle activity during some isolated trunk exercises and squat exercises. ...
... In addition, they reported that isometric exercises such as prone bridge could provide adequate stimulation for the core muscles. In contrast to the studies (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;Comfort et al., 2011), Bird et al. (2006 stated that the external oblique and rectus abdominis were significantly less active during the Ab-Slide exercise performed as an eccentric than during the crunch exercise performed as a concentric and the crunch exercise could prefer for abdominal exercise. Luciano et al. (2020) compared the muscle activation of rectus femoris and rectus abdominis in sit-up and curl-up. ...
Article
Full-text available
With the increasing importance of physical fitness in the world, physical activity types such as CrossFit, which includes high-intensity combined movements, have become popular. The aim of this study was to compare the rectus abdominis (RA) muscle activation during the kipping toes-to-bar (KTB) and the strict toes-to-bar (STB) movements. RA muscle activation was measured during the KTB and STB exercises in 12 healthy young men. Participants performed 5 repetitions of both KTB and STB exercises in randomized order. Participants performed both exercises with a 5-minute rest interval. For comparing the RA muscle activity during the KTB and STB paired sample t-test was used. A significant difference was found between the KTB (359.56 ± 160.50 μV) and the STB (415.37 ± 185.63 μV) for RA muscle activation (p<0.05). These findings demonstrated that the difference in RA muscle activity during the STB and KTB movements showcases the importance of the STB movement on the RA that revealed greater motor units’ activation in a non-oscillation position. The study finding emerges that the same exercise can lead to different motor unit activations in the same muscle group, depending on the way the movement is performed.
... Contreras et al. [19] found no differences in the activation of the vastus lateralis (VL), gluteus maximus (GM), and BF muscles relative to the range of motion in the squat. To our knowledge, this is one of the few studies that try to relate these variables exclusively to females, but the studies did not report in their findings the relationship between activation and muscle actions [13,18,20]. ...
... It occurred because this muscle has a higher moment arm during this action [24], which occurs when the knee angle is around 90 • [19]. Moreover, the higher activation during the eccentric action could be justified by the higher magnitude of the used load since smaller ranges allow the use of higher loads [25] and, consequently, lead to higher muscle activation [20]. ...
... Load reduced when the squat depth increased, which was also reported by Flores et al. [25]. In turn, higher loads seem to influence higher kinetic stimulus and higher activation for this muscle [20]. This principle is supported by Morton et al. [27] and Looney et al. [28], who claim that higher loads provide greater recruitment of motor units, based on the higher range of the electromyographic signals compared to lighter loads. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: To analyze the muscle activation of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), gluteus maximus (GM), and biceps femoris (BF) in concentric and eccentric actions in the squat at 90 • and 140 • range of motion. Methods: Thirty-five women (32.9 ± 7.4 years; 64.5 ± 11.5 kg; 1.63 ± 0.1 m; BMI: 24.2 ± 2.9 kg/m 2 ; %fat: 24.9 ± 6.5%) experienced exercise for at least eight weeks. Electrodes were positioned in standardized locations. The signals were acquired by an A/D SAS1000 V8 converter and the electromyographic activity normalized in the percentage of the highest produced value (%RMS). The data were analyzed using repeated measures two-way ANOVA, with effect size (η 2) and differences calculated in percentage points (∆ p.p.). Results: The RF (p = 0.001; ∆ = 5.1 p.p.) and BF activation (p = 0.020; ∆ = 4.0 p.p.) was higher at 90 • in the eccentric action. The RF showed an interaction between the range of motion and %RMS, with a large effect size (F = 37.9; p = 0.001; η 2 = 0.485). The VL activation was higher at 140 • (p = 0.005; ∆ = 3.9 p.p.) in the concentric action and higher at 90 • (p = 0.006; ∆ = 3.7 p.p.) in the eccentric action, with a large effect size significant interaction (F = 21.3; p = 0.001; η 2 = 0.485). The GM activation was higher at 90 • in the concentric (p = 0.020; ∆ = 5.4 p.p.) and eccentric action (p = 0.022; ∆ = 41 p.p.). Conclusions: The biarticular muscles were influenced by the squat range only in the eccentric action of the movement, while the monoarticular muscles were influenced by the squat in both concentric and eccentric muscle action.
... A major part of the studies found the main activity on the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and rectus femoris, in this order (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;Contreras et al., 2015Contreras et al., , 2016da Silva et al., 2017;Delgado et al., 2019;Ebben et al., 2009;Eliassen et al., 2018;Gorsuch et al., 2013;Hammond et al., 2016;Iversen et al., 2017;Korak et al., 2018;Robbins, 2011;Schwanbeck et al., 2009;Wu et al., 2019;Yavuz et al., 2015). Only one study found major activation on the biceps femoris than on each of these three aforementioned muscles . ...
... Regarding the activation on the gluteus and hamstrings, while some authors observed a greater activation on the gluteus maximus (Caterisano et al., 2002;Fauth et al., 2010;McCurdy et al., 2018), others reported a higher activity on the hamstrings Delgado et al., 2019;Gullett et al., 2009). Only three authors reported activation levels on the muscles of the calves when performing a high-bar squat (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;da Silva et al., 2017;Schwanbeck et al., 2009). ...
... Two studies analysed this variation of the squat exercise (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;Bautista, 2019). As happened with the rest of the variations, major activation levels were found on the vastus lateralis in both studies. ...
Article
Full-text available
The squat is one of the most commonly used resistance exercises for performance and health due to its biomechanical and neuromuscular similarities to a wide range of athletic and everyday activities. There is a large number of squat variations (based on the descent depth, width of the stance, bar placement) with significant biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between them. The aim of this study was to systematically review the scientific literature to gather data on the muscular activation of the lower limb during different variants of the squat exercise. High-bar squat (full range of motion, to parallel and partial range of motion), low-bar squat, front squat, overhead squat and guided squat on Smith machine were included in the analysis. 30 articles met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Quality of the included studies was analysed with the PEDro scale. Main findings were that in the squat exercise activation of the knee-extensors is predominant. However, different activation patterns were observed with different distances between the feet, different depths, hips rotation or flexion, intensities. For instance, low-bar squat involves a greater hip hinge and thus, provokes major activation on the hip-extensors than other squat variations. It is worth highlighting that similar activation patterns were observed between the front squat and the high-bar squat. The variation with least activation was the guided squat. The evidence presented in this study may help the strength and conditioning professionals and practitioners with the exercise selection depending on the muscular targets and the individual characteristics of the athlete. Keywords: Electromyographic activity; Resistance exercise; Quadriceps; Gluteus; Hamstrings; Calves.
... In contrast, the abdominals (i.e., rectus abdominis (RA), internal (IO) and external oblique (EO)) play a crucial role in controlling the lumbar spine to prevent excessive curvature (hyperlordosis) (Cholewicki et al., 1997;Hodges et al., 2013). Thus, the abdominal and the back muscles are commonly examined regarding trunk stabilization (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;Clark et al., 2016;Willardson et al., 2009;van den Tillaar, & Saeterbakken, 2018). In practice, many variations of squats are performed by athletes, recreationally trained subjects and novices as well. ...
... A notable higher trunk muscle activity has been observed, especially during free weight lifting compared to machines (Behm & Colado Sanchez, 2013;Schwanbeck et al., 2009). Aspe et al (2014) showed a higher level of trunk muscle activity generated during the overhead squat compared to performing back squats. Looking at available studies, no consensus on activity profiles depending on the barbell position of the trunk muscles was reported, both during lowering (Anderson & Behm, 2005a) or lifting phase (K Anderson & DG. ...
... Behm, 2005b). One possible reason for this can be seen in the various constellations performing the squat: lowering slow, lifting fast (Aspe & Swinton, 2014), both in similar (K Anderson & DG. Behm, 2005b) or at a self-determined pace (Drinkwater et al., 2007). ...
Article
Squats are considered a useful basic exercise for trunk muscle activation. To gain knowledge about trunk muscle activity patterns depending on the barbell position in beginners, we examined squats with low weights in the back, front, and overhead position. Methods: Twelve healthy adults (6 women/6 men, age: 29.1 (SD 8.0) y, height: 173.4 (6.9) cm, body mass: 70.1 (9.1) kg) randomly performed the three barbell squats in normal and in forefoot standing. Surface electromyography from external (EO) and internal oblique, rectus abdominis, and erector spinae (ES) was recorded. The centre of pressure path length (CoP) and the motion of the lumbar spine were captured. Results: The overhead squat revealed the highest percent muscle activity, where EO (p = 0.009) and ES (p = 0.03) showed the greatest activity. Forefoot standing did not change overall trunk muscle activities (.05< Hedges' g <.29, 0.17 < p < 0.95) although longer CoP path length (.45 < g < 1.3, p < 0.05) was measured. Conclusions: Squat exercises with low weight are useful to activate trunk muscles. Activity increases with the difficulty of the squat by frontal or overhead loading, but not by standing on the forefoot. The low weighted squat can target well core muscle activity in training with beginners or in rehabilitation.
... Though squat variations have been extensively studied, the vast majority of attention has been given to leg musculature such as vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, gastrocnemius, soleus, and bicep femoris, as well as trunk musculature such as the rectus abdominis, external oblique and erector spinae. Comparison studies have previously examined these muscles in the free weight barbell squat and smith machine squat (24), FS and back squat (31), back squat on various unstable surfaces (23), high bar and low bar back squat (9), back squat and weighted sled (16), partial and full back squat (8), different stance widths during back squat (21), and back squat vs OHS (2). Still, to date, a dearth of knowledge exists concerning how the FS and OHS differentially impact muscle activity of the scapula and trunk. ...
... Participants were given two to five minutes of rest between all sets (warm-ups and 3-RM attempts). The 3-RM score was accepted upon successful completion of three consecutive repetitions of the squat to the depth of at least top of the thigh reaching parallel to floor by visual observation of researcher (2). After completion of either 3-RM squat, FS or OHS (randomized) participants rested ten minutes before attempting 3-RM protocol of the other squat condition. ...
... The AD is also important for the FS because it assists in keeping the humerus in a flexed position, not allowing the barbell to roll off (11). This lends support to the present data showing that AD muscle activity was greater during the FS; though AD still does have an important role in the OHS (2,14). That the MT exhibited greater activity during the OHS also demonstrates the importance of scapular positioning. ...
Article
Full-text available
International Journal of Exercise Science 13(1): 714-722, 2020. The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle activation of the scapula, leg, and trunk among the front squat (FS), overhead squat (OHS), back extension (BE) and plank (PL). Seven recreationally trained men (age: 28 ± 3.6 years, body mass: 92 ± 26.1 kg, height: 175 ± 5.3 cm, 3-RM front squat test: 125 ± 49.8 kg, 3-RM overhead squat test: 91 ± 15.5 kg) participated in this within-subject crossover design. Two isometric exercises (plank and Biering-Sorenson back extension) were also included for trunk musculature comparisons. Neuromuscular activitation of the vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF), thoracic region of erector spinae (ES), middle trapezius (MT), rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), serratus anterior (SA), and anterior deltoid (AD). The neuromuscular activity of the FS and OHS were analyzed using a 2 X 3 (squat variation X intensity) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Effects were further analyzed by Bonferroni corrected paired t-tests. Results showed that AD activity was significantly greater (p < .05) during the FS compared to OHS at 65 and 95% of the 3-RM, while MT activity was significantly greater (p < .05) during the OHS than the FS at 80 and 95% of the 3-RM. ES activity was significantly greater (p< .05) during both the FS and OHS compared to the BE, but PL elicited significantly greater EO and RA activity than both the FS and OHS. These findings reveal that the FS and OHS can help facilitate the activation of muscles supporting the shoulder complex, scapula and lower back.
... Recently, several studies have tried to identify the neuromuscular activation of core muscles using exercises isolating the core muscles (i.e., sit-ups) or exercises integrating the core muscles in multijoint exercises (i.e., squats and deadlift) (20,29,31). Furthermore, unstable instead of stable surfaces (i.e., BOSU balls or wobble discs), unilateral instead of bilateral execution, standing instead of seated/supine position, or a combination of these conditions have been used to increase surface electromyography (sEMG) in core muscle in traditional resistance exercises (3,4,6,27,32,34). For example, high-intensity multijoint resistance exercises (squat and deadlift) demonstrated greater (17,26) sEMG in the core muscles than isolated core-specific exercises (side bridge and back extension). ...
... In squats, greater (4,6) or similar (2,34,38,43) sEMG amplitude in the core muscle has been demonstrated using an unstable surface compared with a stable surface (2,4,34,43). However, performing squats on balance discs, BOSU balls, or wobble boards (major stability requirements) exceeds the stability requirements in sports or daily-living activities. ...
... Several explanations may explain the findings. First, the differences observed in this study between the 3 exercises may have been a result of stability requirements (4,6). For example, increased stability requirements are associated with greater erector spinae sEMG amplitude (4,27). ...
Article
Saeterbakken, AH, Stien, N, Pedersen, H, and Andersen, V. Core muscle activation in three lower extremity with different stability requirements. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2019-The aim of the study was to compare core muscle surface electromyography (sEMG) during 3-repetition maximum (3RM) and the sEMG amplitude in the turnover from the descending to ascending phase in leg press, free-weight squats, and squats using the Smith machine. Nineteen women with 4.5 (±2.0) years of resistance training were recruited. After one familiarization session, the subjects performed 3RM in randomized order measuring electromyographic activity in the rectus abdominis, external oblique, and erector spinae. The exercises with the lowest stability requirements (leg press) demonstrated 17-59% and 17-42% lower core muscle sEMG amplitude than free weights and the Smith machine, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the Smith machine and free weights. No statistically significant differences in turnover sEMG amplitude in the rectus abdominis between the exercises was observed, but lower sEMG amplitude was observed in external oblique and erector spinae in leg press compared with the other exercises. The 3RM loads in leg press were 54 and 47% greater than squats using the Smith machine and free weights, with 5% greater loads with the Smith machine than with free weights. In conclusion, lower mean and turnover core muscle sEMG amplitude were observed with the leg press but greater 3RM loads compared with squats with the Smith machine and free weights. The authors recommend that resistance-trained individuals use squats to include the core muscles in the kinetic chain, but there is no evidence that greater stability requirements (free weights instead of the Smith machine) will result in greater core muscle sEMG amplitude.
... The squat is a wide entity, comprising the partial squat , half squat (Hartmann et al., 2013), parallel squat (Caterisano et al., 2002;Contreras et al., 2016;Hartmann et al., 2013), full squat (Caterisano et al., 2002;Contreras et al., 2016), and deep squat (Hartmann et al., 2013). Furthermore, there are front (Aspe and Swinton 2014;Clark et al., 2012;Contreras et al., 2016), back (Aspe and Swinton 2014;Clark et al., 2012;Gullett et al., 2009) and overhead squats (Gullett et al., 2009) with various bar positioning, which have been previously analyzed. In the squat exercise, several factors or conditions can influence the muscle activity, including the knee angle (Gryzlo et al., 1994), foot width McCaw and Melrose, 1999), rotation of the lower limbs Ninos et al., 1997;Signorile et al., 1995), or whether the knees going over the toes or not (Fry et al., 2003;Isear et al., 1997). ...
... The squat is a wide entity, comprising the partial squat , half squat (Hartmann et al., 2013), parallel squat (Caterisano et al., 2002;Contreras et al., 2016;Hartmann et al., 2013), full squat (Caterisano et al., 2002;Contreras et al., 2016), and deep squat (Hartmann et al., 2013). Furthermore, there are front (Aspe and Swinton 2014;Clark et al., 2012;Contreras et al., 2016), back (Aspe and Swinton 2014;Clark et al., 2012;Gullett et al., 2009) and overhead squats (Gullett et al., 2009) with various bar positioning, which have been previously analyzed. In the squat exercise, several factors or conditions can influence the muscle activity, including the knee angle (Gryzlo et al., 1994), foot width McCaw and Melrose, 1999), rotation of the lower limbs Ninos et al., 1997;Signorile et al., 1995), or whether the knees going over the toes or not (Fry et al., 2003;Isear et al., 1997). ...
... (Palmitier et al., 1991). However, compared to that of other muscles, the activations of these muscles are relatively low in squat exercises, even with the addition of the barbell (Aspe and Swinton, 2014;Contreras et al., 2016;Gullett et al., 2009). Thus, a new strategy that better focuses on the target muscles is clearly required for effective squat training. ...
Article
The squat exercise is a fundamental movement in athletic training and rehabilitation. In this study, we measured muscle activities in a normal squat posture (NSP) and a squat posture with the center of foot pressure (COP) intentionally shifted forward as far as possible (FSP). Ten healthy men performed double-limb squats, adopting the NSP and FSP, with three knee flexion angles (30, 60, and 90 degrees). The muscle activities of the vastus medialis (VM), semitendinosus (ST), tibialis anterior (TA), and gastrocnemius muscle lateral head (GL) were measured using surface electromyography, and activity patterns were analyzed. Compared to that for the NSP, the COP was significantly shifted forward in the FSP by at least 30% of the foot length for all knee flexion angles (p < 0.05). At all knee flexion angles, VM muscle activity significantly decreased, while GL muscle activity increased, in the FSP compared to that for the NSP (p < 0.05). In addition, ST muscle activity increased significantly in the FSP compared to that for the NSP at knee flexion angles of 30 and 60 degrees (p < 0.05). TA muscle activity significantly decreased in the FSP compared to that for the NSP at only 90 degrees of knee flexion (p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that muscle activity patterns vary significantly according to squat posture. Thus, the active control of the COP position during the squat can be a new training approach in targeting specific muscle groups.
... Hence, these do not represent training overload in preparation for activities that characterise most sports and athletic events. Researchers have begun to investigate trunk muscle activation in a number of dynamic, loaded free weight exercises to determine their suitability for the development of dynamic trunk strength and stability [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Surface electromyography methodology shows there is good evidence that loaded exercises performed in a standing position are an effective method of overloading the trunk stabilization system in a dynamic manner. ...
... Yes 89 (37) No ...
... There is growing evidence in the literature that external load in free barbell exercises performed in a standing position is related to muscle activation of trunk stabilisers [29,30,33,34,37,50]. Impact of this stimulus on core stability in dynamic athletic performance is more difficult to demonstrate. ...
Article
Background: Core stability training has grown in popularity over 25 years, initially for back pain prevention or therapy. Subsequently, it developed as a mode of exercise training for health, fitness and sport. The scientific basis for traditional core stability exercise has recently been questioned and challenged, especially in relation to dynamic athletic performance. Reviews have called for clarity on what constitutes anatomy and function of the core, especially in healthy and uninjured people. Clinical research suggests that traditional core stability training is inappropriate for development of fitness for heath and sports performance. However, commonly used methods of measuring core stability in research do not reflect functional nature of core stability in uninjured, healthy and athletic populations. Recent reviews have proposed a more dynamic, whole body approach to training core stabilization, and research has begun to measure and report efficacy of these modes training. The purpose of this study was to assess extent to which these developments have informed people currently working and participating in sport. Methods: An online survey questionnaire was developed around common themes on core stability training as defined in the current scientific literature and circulated to a sample population of people working and participating in sport. Survey results were assessed against key elements of the current scientific debate. Results: Perceptions on anatomy and function of the core were gathered from a representative cohort of athletes, coaches, sports science and sports medicine practitioners (n = 241), along with their views on effectiveness of various current and traditional exercise training modes. Most popular method of testing and measuring core function was subjective assessment through observation (43%), while a quarter (22%) believed there was no effective method of measurement. Perceptions of people in sport reflect the scientific debate, and practitioners have adopted a more functional approach to core stability training. There was strong support for loaded, compound exercises performed upright, compared to moderate support for traditional core stability exercises. Half of the participants (50%) in the survey, however, still support a traditional isolation core stability training. Conclusion: Perceptions in applied practice on core stability training for dynamic athletic performance are aligned to a large extent to the scientific literature. Keywords:
... It is determined that excessive force applied on the spine is the main cause of spinal damage. 5 In previous studies about LBP patient and motor control, compared to a person without chronic low back pain (CLBP), a person with CLBP had delayed activation of TrA, MF, and it was reported that there was a slow response and a more severe contraction. Mahmood et al.(2015) researched about microtrauma of the back according to sudden neuromuscular system response in standing position and a different result from previous studies was derived. ...
... In the preceding article, Andersen et al.(2016) showed low activity the muscle in contralateral side compared to ipsilateral side of RA muscle during the OKBS, showed low activity the muscle compared to two-armed kettlebell swing. 8 The other leading article, Aspe et al.(2014) reported that the overhead squat and back squat, the activity of RA muscle was a significant difference statistically, was reported the high activity of the muscle in anterior trunk muscle(rectus abdominis and external oblique) during the eccentric phase of the overhead squat. 5 Based on the above article, the author of this study was expected to demonstrate the greatest activation in the KBS that potential energy of hand moving from the highest point during eccentric phase, second, expected to show the greatest activity in the AKBS. ...
... 8 The other leading article, Aspe et al.(2014) reported that the overhead squat and back squat, the activity of RA muscle was a significant difference statistically, was reported the high activity of the muscle in anterior trunk muscle(rectus abdominis and external oblique) during the eccentric phase of the overhead squat. 5 Based on the above article, the author of this study was expected to demonstrate the greatest activation in the KBS that potential energy of hand moving from the highest point during eccentric phase, second, expected to show the greatest activity in the AKBS. As a result, the author as expected, KBS is higher the activity of RA than the RKBS. ...
... The OHS, a functional movement used to improve performance, emphasizes the strength of the posterior chain and the stabilization required to keep the bar above the head (Altepeter & Mike, 2017). It allows the practitioner to feel comfortable, since the movement necessitates a neuromuscular balance similar to that in the snatch (Altepeter & Mike, 2017;Aspe & Swinton, 2014). ...
... The inclusion of the OHS for screening movement patterns is important because of its ability to test and challenge the joint mobility of practitioners, involving a greater amount of muscle than other variations such as the back squat, for example. The analysis of movement patterns without the arms above the head can result in a lack of information on aspects such as trunk stability and shoulder position (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;Bishop et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to identify changes in the pattern of movement during performance of the overhead squat, as well as possible differences between the sexes, during a protocol of an extreme conditioning program. The subjects were eleven men (28.6 ± 4.5 years, 85.1 ± 8.4 kg, 1.80 ± 0.07 m, and 13.8 ± 7.7 months of practice) and eleven women (30.5 ± 4.8 years, 68.2 ± 10.36 kg, 1.70 ± 0.05 m, and 20.3 ± 17.01 months of practice), all of whom were extreme conditioning program practitioners. The protocol chosen for the training was the “Nautical Nancy”, which consisted of 5 rounds of 15 overhead squats and 400 meters of rowing. During the exercise, an analysis was performed in which the shoulder, knee, and hip flexion angles were analyzed in the first and last rounds. For men, there were increases of the shoulder and hip flexion angles, while the women showed increase of the shoulder flexion angle and decrease of the knee flexion angle. Changes in technique occurred due to the attempt at self-preservation on the part of the practitioners, when exposed to the protocol, which could lead to increased risk of injury. Key words: CrossFit; High Intensity Functional Training; Resistance Training; Biomechanics; Exercise Technique.
... Squats can refer to a wide variety of exercises, comprising partial squat [6], half squat [7], parallel squat [8,9], full squat [8,9], and deep squat [7]. Furthermore, there are front [9][10][11], back [10][11][12], and overhead squats [12] with various bar positionings. ...
... Squats can refer to a wide variety of exercises, comprising partial squat [6], half squat [7], parallel squat [8,9], full squat [8,9], and deep squat [7]. Furthermore, there are front [9][10][11], back [10][11][12], and overhead squats [12] with various bar positionings. ...
Article
Full-text available
Isometric bodyweight squats are fundamental exercises in athletic training and rehabilitation. Previously, we measured muscle activity in a normal squat posture (NSP) and a squat posture with the center of foot pressure (COP) intentionally shifted forward as far as possible (forward-shifted posture: FSP), and the muscle activity patterns varied significantly according to the COP location. This study focused on stepwise loading as a training strategy. Ten healthy male participants performed isometric bodyweight squats in a previous study, adopting the NSP and FSP, with three knee flexion angles (30°, 60°, and 90°). The muscle activities of the vastus medialis (VM), semitendinosus, tibialis anterior (TA), and gastrocnemius muscle lateral head were measured using surface electromyogram. This study further explored the relationship between COP shifting and knee flexion angles on electromyogram changes using three-dimensional diagrams. In one-way repeated measures analysis of variance by ranks, knee flexion angles affected the muscle activities of the VM and TA in the NSP and muscle activities of the VM in the FSP. Combining these findings, stepwise loading tasks were created to train individual target muscles. The ten male participants examined all the tasks, and the feasibility was confirmed accordingly.
... Although some complex exercises with light external loads are recommended for DSS muscle development [19,20], others, such as squats and sit-ups, have been reported as preferential for the superficial erector spinae [20] or rectus abdominis [8,21]. In exercise selection for athletes, it is crucial to focus on those exercises that develop the DSS muscles without overloading the superficial agonists [19], e.g., various quadruped and tripod stability positions [11,22]. ...
... Although some complex exercises with light external loads are recommended for DSS muscle development [19,20], others, such as squats and sit-ups, have been reported as preferential for the superficial erector spinae [20] or rectus abdominis [8,21]. In exercise selection for athletes, it is crucial to focus on those exercises that develop the DSS muscles without overloading the superficial agonists [19], e.g., various quadruped and tripod stability positions [11,22]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: This study aimed to compare the effect of traditional and stability-oriented strength exercises on trunk stability and deep stabilization system (DSS) activation in elite futsal players. Methods: Twenty elite futsal players (21-34 years, 180 ± 13 cm, 79 ± 15 kg) were randomly divided into a group that performed stability-oriented exercises and a group that performed traditional strength exercises. Both interventions lasted for 10 weeks and included 25 strength training sessions. Main outcome measures: The DSS pretest and posttest included the diaphragm test, trunk flexion test, back extension test, hip flexion test, intraabdominal pressure test, and a side plank test on a 1-5 point scale. Results: Both groups had similar initial test results, where the stability-oriented exercise group had significantly improved intraabdominal pressure test (p = 0.004, by lower quartile rate), trunk flexion (p = 0.036, by 0.5 grade in median), and side plank (p = 0.002, by 1 grade in median) in posttest results. Traditional exercise did not change the results of any of the included DSS function tests. Conclusions: Stabilization-oriented exercises effectively activate the functions of the DSS and should be prioritized over traditional strength exercises in injury prevention training programs. The use of stabilization-oriented exercises might prevent injury and overloading in elite futsal players.
... Nesse contexto, o agachamento é considerado um dos principais exercícios para melhorar a funcionalidade, devido à sua habilidade de recrutar vários grupos musculares (8,9) , uma vez que muitas atividades diárias necessitam da coordenação e interação simultânea de vários grupos musculares. Além do mais, este exercício também tem boa capacidade de ativação da musculatura do tronco (10) . ...
... A coluna vertebral é sustentada por um arranjo de músculos, incluindo os eretores da espinha, transverso do abdômen e quadrado lombar. Os eretores da espinha são particularmente importantes durante o agachamento, pois são músculos de estabilização que têm boa ativação durante o agachamento (10) por contribuírem para a estabilização da espinha, ajudando a coluna vertebral a resistir ao cisalhamento, evitando movimentos anteroposterior da espinha. ...
... Table 1 describes the exercises investigated, methods of EMG normalization, testing load, and the main findings. Of these, ten studies investigated the back squat exercise and its variations [partial, parallel and full] (Aspe and Swinton, 2014;Contreras et al., 2015b;2016a;Da Silva et al., 2017;Evans et al., 2019;Gomes et al., 2015;McCurdy et al., 2018;Williams et al., 2018;Yavuz et al., 2015;Yavuz and Erdag, 2017), five studies investigated the barbell hip thrust and its variations [American and traditional styles and different feet positions] (Andersen et al., 2018;Collazo Garcia et al., 2018;Contreras et al., 2015b;2016b;Williams et al., 2018), three studies investigated the deadlift, and its variations [traditional and hex bar] (Andersen et al., 2018;Escamilla et al. 2002;McCurdy et al., 2018) and two studies investigated the front squat (Contreras et al., 2016a;Yavuz et al., 2015). Other studies investigated the overhead squat (Aspe and Swinton, 2014), split squat (Williams et al., 2018), modified single-leg squat (McCurdy et al., 2018), belt squat (Evans et al., 2019), lunges (Marchetti et al., 2018), and step-ups (Simenz et al., 2012). ...
... Of these, ten studies investigated the back squat exercise and its variations [partial, parallel and full] (Aspe and Swinton, 2014;Contreras et al., 2015b;2016a;Da Silva et al., 2017;Evans et al., 2019;Gomes et al., 2015;McCurdy et al., 2018;Williams et al., 2018;Yavuz et al., 2015;Yavuz and Erdag, 2017), five studies investigated the barbell hip thrust and its variations [American and traditional styles and different feet positions] (Andersen et al., 2018;Collazo Garcia et al., 2018;Contreras et al., 2015b;2016b;Williams et al., 2018), three studies investigated the deadlift, and its variations [traditional and hex bar] (Andersen et al., 2018;Escamilla et al. 2002;McCurdy et al., 2018) and two studies investigated the front squat (Contreras et al., 2016a;Yavuz et al., 2015). Other studies investigated the overhead squat (Aspe and Swinton, 2014), split squat (Williams et al., 2018), modified single-leg squat (McCurdy et al., 2018), belt squat (Evans et al., 2019), lunges (Marchetti et al., 2018), and step-ups (Simenz et al., 2012). External loads were prescribed either by % of 1RM (varied from 40 to 100% of 1RM) or repetition maximum (varied from 3 to 12RM). ...
Article
Full-text available
The gluteus maximus (GMax) is one of the primary hip extensors. Several exercises have been performed by strength and conditioning practitioners aiming to increase GMax strength and size. This systematic review aimed to describe the GMax activation levels during strength exercises that incorporate hip extension and use of external load. A search of the current literature was performed using PubMed/Medline, SportDiscuss, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Science Direct electronic databases. Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria and reported muscle activation levels as a percentage of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). The exercises classified as very high level of GMax activation (>60% MVIC) were step-up, lateral step-up, diagonal step-up, cross over step-up, hex bar deadlift, rotational barbell hip thrust, traditional barbell hip thrust, American barbell hip thrust, belt squat, split squat, in-line lunge, traditional lunge, pull barbell hip thrust, modified single-leg squat, conventional deadlift, and band hip thrust. We concluded that several exercises could induce very high levels of GMax activation. The step-up exercise and its variations present the highest levels of GMax activation followed by several loaded exercises and its variations, such as deadlifts, hip thrusts, lunges, and squats. The results of this systematic review may assist practitioners in selecting exercised for strengthening GMax.
... in back squat. 1 We and others have shown a load effect for trunk muscle activation in this exercise. [1][2][3][4]11 Activation increased by load in eccentric and concentric phases for all four trunk muscle sites: rectus abdominus (RA), external oblique (EO), lumbar sacral erector spinae (LSES), and upper lumbar erector spinae (ULES). 1,2 Higher trunk muscle activation in concentric phase of loaded back squat compared to the descent has been demonstrated in our laboratory 1,2 and by others. ...
... 1,2 Higher trunk muscle activation in concentric phase of loaded back squat compared to the descent has been demonstrated in our laboratory 1,2 and by others. 11,12 Understanding how trunk muscle activation responds to the same relative back squat load in strong compared to weaker participants will contribute to establishing this exercise as an effective method of developing dynamic trunk stability. ...
Article
This study measured how back squat strength (1RM) affected trunk muscle activation in performing squats, squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ). Fifty males, completed two test sessions. Squat 1RM was tested first. Participants were assigned to three groups; (i) strong group (SG), (ii) middle group (MG) or (iii) weak group (WG), based on relative squat 1RM. Test 2, EMG data were collected for 4 trunk muscle sites; rectus abdominus, external oblique, lumbar sacral erector spinae and upper lumbar erector spinae while performing (3 reps) SJ, CMJ and squats at 65, 75 and 95% 1RM. Squat and jump phases were determined from a linear transducer and 30o tertiles for each phase, from a knee goniometer. Normalized root mean square RMS increased significantly with load for each muscle site in both squat phases. Trunk muscle activation was significantly lower in SG vs WG in eccentric and concentric squat phases. Concentric and flight phase RMS in both jumps was lower in SG vs WG. RMS increased significantly for each eccentric tertile and first concentric tertile. Greater squat strength is associated with lower trunk muscle activation in squats and jumps and trunk muscle activation was highest in the two deepest 30o squat segments. In conclusion, back squat strength training to parallel, where top of thighs are horizontal, is an effective method of developing dynamic trunk stability. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
... However, because that study involved only five muscles (vastus lateralis and medialis, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, and erector spinae), it does not offer full insights about the behavior of muscles during squats. Furthermore, the studies involving muscle activation during squats were all performed with a load above 80% of 1-RM, with several repetitions of lifts and with no directive to lift with maximal intended velocity [12,[14][15][16][17]. Two studies have investigated muscle activation during squats with loads varying from 60%, 75%, and 90% of 1-RM [18,19]. However, in these two studies, different variations of back squats were compared with each other: with and without knee wraps [18], or the overhead with the standard squat [19], and not the different loads with each other. ...
... Furthermore, the studies involving muscle activation during squats were all performed with a load above 80% of 1-RM, with several repetitions of lifts and with no directive to lift with maximal intended velocity [12,[14][15][16][17]. Two studies have investigated muscle activation during squats with loads varying from 60%, 75%, and 90% of 1-RM [18,19]. However, in these two studies, different variations of back squats were compared with each other: with and without knee wraps [18], or the overhead with the standard squat [19], and not the different loads with each other. ...
Article
Full-text available
Although several studies have examined the effects of performing resistance training with different percentages of one-repetition maximum (1-RM), little is known of the neuromuscular effects and kinematics of lifting low to heavy loads with maximal movement velocity. The aim of this study is to compare muscle activation and kinematics in free-weight back squats with different loads. Thirteen resistance-training males (aged 24.2 ± 2.0 years, body mass 81.5 ± 9.1 kg, height 1.78 ± 0.06 m) with 6 ± 3 years of resistance-training experience conducted squats with 30%–100% of 1-RM. Barbell kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity of the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, and gluteus maximus were measured in the upward phase of each load. With increasing loads, the barbell velocity decreased, the upward phase duration increased, and the peak velocity occurred later. The muscle activation in all muscles increased with increasing loads but was not linear. In general, similar muscle activation in the prime movers was observed for loads between 40% and 60% of 1-RM and between 70% and 90% of 1-RM, with 100% of 1-RM being superior to the other loads when the loads were lifted at maximal intended velocity. However, the timing of maximal muscle activations was not affected by the different loadings for the quadriceps, but the timing was sequential and independent of loading (rectus femoris before vastus medial before vastus lateral). Maximal activation in the gluteus and semitendinosus increased with increasing loads. This means that for muscle activation, maximal lifting velocity may compensate for increased loads, which may allow resistance-trained athletes and individuals in rehabilitation to avoid heavy loads but still get the same muscle activation.
... Hence, these do not represent training overload in preparation for activities that characterise most sports and athletic events. Researchers have begun to investigate trunk muscle activation in a number of dynamic, loaded free weight exercises to determine their suitability for the development of dynamic trunk strength and stability [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Surface electromyography methodology shows there is good evidence that loaded exercises performed in a standing position are an effective method of overloading the trunk stabilization system in a dynamic manner. ...
... There is growing evidence in the literature that external load in free barbell exercises performed in a standing position is related to muscle activation of trunk stabilisers [29,30,33,34,37,50]. Impact of this stimulus on core stability in dynamic athletic performance is more difficult to demonstrate. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Core stability training has grown in popularity over 25 years, initially for back pain prevention or therapy. Subsequently, it developed as a mode of exercise training for health, fitness and sport. The scientific basis for traditional core stability exercise has recently been questioned and challenged, especially in relation to dynamic athletic performance. Reviews have called for clarity on what constitutes anatomy and function of the core, especially in healthy and uninjured people. Clinical research suggests that traditional core stability training is inappropriate for development of fitness for heath and sports performance. However, commonly used methods of measuring core stability in research do not reflect functional nature of core stability in uninjured, healthy and athletic populations. Recent reviews have proposed a more dynamic, whole body approach to training core stabilization, and research has begun to measure and report efficacy of these modes training. The purpose of this study was to assess extent to which these developments have informed people currently working and participating in sport. Methods: An online survey questionnaire was developed around common themes on core stability training as defined in the current scientific literature and circulated to a sample population of people working and participating in sport. Survey results were assessed against key elements of the current scientific debate. Results: Perceptions on anatomy and function of the core were gathered from a representative cohort of athletes, coaches, sports science and sports medicine practitioners (n = 241), along with their views on effectiveness of various current and traditional exercise training modes. Most popular method of testing and measuring core function was subjective assessment through observation (43%), while a quarter (22%) believed there was no effective method of measurement. Perceptions of people in sport reflect the scientific debate, and practitioners have adopted a more functional approach to core stability training. There was strong support for loaded, compound exercises performed upright, compared to moderate support for traditional core stability exercises. Half of the participants (50%) in the survey, however, still support a traditional isolation core stability training. Conclusion: Perceptions in applied practice on core stability training for dynamic athletic performance are aligned to a large extent to the scientific literature.
... A possible explanation for these findings may be related to the movement execution itself, where the barbell is accelerated more quickly to achieve a transition from the pull to catch that phase when compared to the HSP. Since the barbell load is anterior to the ES, a faster acceleration of the barbell would create the higher trunk flexion toques that are needed to be resisted throughout the movement and, therefore, potentially increase the normalized EMG activity in the ES (Aspe and Swinton, 2014). Partially contradicting this assumption was the significantly lower ES muscle activation during the second pulling motion of the snatch pull / clean pull compared when compared to the full snatch/clean observed by Häkkinen and Kauhanen (1986), although each pulling motion (i.e., first, transition, second pull) of the full clean/ snatch as well as power clean/snatch were performed at faster velocities than the various pulling derivatives. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose was to compare the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the Hang Power Clean (HPC) and Hang Power Snatch (HPS) with the Hang Clean Pull (HCP) and Hang Snatch Pull (HSP). Additionally, the influence of weightlifting expertise (beginner, advanced and elite) on EMG activity was analyzed. Twenty-seven weightlifters (beginner: n = 11, age: 23.9 ± 3.2 years, bodyweight: 75.7 ± 10.5 kg; advanced: n = 10, age: 24.8 ± 4.5 years, bodyweight: 69.4 ± 13.9 kg; elite: n = 6, age: 25.5 ± 5.2 years, bodyweight: 75.5 ± 12.5 kg) participated in this study. Participants performed two repetitions of HPC, HPS, HCP, and HSP at 50%, 70%, and 90% 1RM, respectively. The EMG activity of vastus lateralis (VL), gluteus maximus (GM), erector spinae (ES), rectus abdominis (RA) and trapezius (TZ) was recorded and normalized to the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of each muscle. There were significant differences in RA and ES EMG activity at 70% and 90% 1RM during HPC compared to HCP in the beginner group (p < 0.05, Hedges g = 0.50-1.06). Significant greater ES activity was observed in the beginner, advanced, and elite groups (p < 0.05, g = 0.27-0.98) during the HPS when compared to the HSP at 50-90% 1RM. TZ muscle activity was significantly greater at 50% and 70% 1RM in the HCP compared to the HPC in the elite group (p < 0.05, g = 0.61-1.08), while the beginner group reached significance only at 50% 1RM favoring HPC (p < 0.05, g = 0.38). Moreover, the EMG activity of the TZ during the HSP and HPS was significantly different only at 50% 1RM in the elite group and favored HSP (p < 0.05, g = 0.27). No differences were observed between the levels of weightlifting expertise. Based upon the results of this study, the overall pattern of EMG activity of the predominant muscles involved in HPC/HPS and the corresponding weightlifting pulling derivatives, apart from the stabilizing muscle (RA and ES), is similar at higher intensities (>70% 1RM) and expertise does not influence muscle activity.
... Further, the survey did not collect information on the specific muscle-strengthening activity performed (e.g., push-up, sit-up). Some studies [73][74][75] suggest the potential differences in biological mechanisms among different muscle-strengthening activities. In a meta-analysis that examined the associations of resistance training [76], the magnitude of blood pressure reduction varied by the type of muscle contraction, whether dynamic (both the length and the tension of the muscles change) or static/isometric (the length does not change). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Studies have shown that aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities reduce mortality risk. However, little is known about the joint associations of the two activity types and whether other type of physical activity, such as flexibility activity, can provide similar mortality risk reduction. Objectives: We examined the independent associations of aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and flexibility physical activities with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a population-based prospective cohort of Korean men and women. We also examined the joint associations of aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities, the two physical activity types that are recommended by the current World Health Organization physical activity guidelines. Design: This analysis included 34,379 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2013 participants (aged 20-79 years) with mortality data linkage through December 31, 2019. Engagement in walking, aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and flexibility physical activities was self-reported at baseline. Cox proportional hazards model was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Flexibility physical activity (≥ 5 vs. 0 d/wk) was inversely associated with all-cause (HR [95% CI] = 0.80 [0.70-0.92]; P-trend < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (0.75 [0.55-1.03], P-trend = 0.02). Moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity (≥ 50.0 vs. 0 MET-h/wk) was also associated with lower all-cause (HR [95% CI] = 0.82 [0.70-0.95]; P-trend < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (0.55 [0.37-0.80]; P-trend < 0.001). Similar inverse associations were observed with total aerobic physical activity, including walking. Muscle-strengthening activity (≥ 5 vs. 0 d/wk) was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (HR [95% CI] = 0.83 [0.68-1.02]; P-trend = 0.01) but was not associated with cancer or cardiovascular mortality. Compared to participants meeting the highest guidelines for both moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities, those not meeting in any guideline were associated with higher all-cause (1.34 [1.09-1.64]) and cardiovascular mortality (1.68 [1.00-2.82]). Conclusions: Our data suggest that aerobic, muscle-strengthening, and flexibility activities are associated with lower risk of mortality.
... Yet, it was possible to estimate the individual patellar tendon strain during squats as a function of the maximum patellar tendon strain during an isometric MVC and the 1RM percentages with high accuracy (R 2 = 0.858), which also confirms our second hypothesis. The resultant knee joint moments during the squats ranged on average from 126 to 226 Nm, which agrees with earlier reported values 20,21 . There was a progressive increase in the resultant knee, hip and ankle joint moment as well as in the EMG-activity of the investigated knee extensor muscles with increasing percentages of the 1RM in all participants, indicating a gradual increase of muscle loading. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tendon strain during exercise is a critical regulatory factor in tendon adaptive responses and there are indications for an optimal range of strain that promotes tendon adaptation. Back squats are used to improve patellar tendon properties in sport and clinical settings. To date, the operating patellar tendon strain during back squats is unknown and current recommendations for individual exercise loading are based on the one repetition maximum (1RM). Here, we quantified patellar tendon strain during loaded back squats at 40, 60 and 80% of the 1RM and during maximum isometric knee extension contractions (MVC) using ultrasonography. Kinematics, ground reaction forces and muscle electromyographic activity were also recorded. Additionally, maximum tendon strain during the MVC and the percentage of 1RM were used as explanatory variables to estimate the individual patellar tendon strain during the squats. Strain increased with increasing 1RM loading (4.7 to 8.2%), indicating that already medium-loading back squats may provide a sufficient stimulus for tendon adaptation. The individual variability was, however, too high to generalize these findings. Yet, there was a high agreement between the individually estimated and measured patellar tendon strain (R² = 0.858) during back squats. We argue that this approach may provide new opportunities for personalized tendon exercise.
... Additionally, relative BBS strength was correlated with ES muscle activity in both males and females regardless of the resistance band being used. This is to be expected as heavier loads lifted in the BBS may require increased muscle activity of the ES to resist trunk flexion (i.e., stabilization) (Aspe and Swinton, 2014). However, when accounted for resistance band strength, females showed a strong correlation between ES muscle activity and relative squat strength during no band, red band, and black band conditions while ascending. ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to compare the muscle activity of the gluteus medius (GMe), gluteus maximus (GMa), biceps femoris (BF), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM) and erector spinae (ES) as well as medial knee displacement (MKD) while using varying stiffness resistance bands (red: 1.68 kg; black: 3.31 kg; gold: 6.44 kg) during a barbell back squat (BBS) among males and females. A total of 23 (females: 11) resistance trained people were recruited for this study. Muscle activity was measured using electromyography, and motion capture cameras tracked lower-limb kinematics and MKD. Three resistance bands were placed at the distal end of the femur while performing a BBS at their 85% repetition maximum (RM). Parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted with the alpha level of 0.05. The gold resistance band resulted in a smaller knee-width-index value (i.e., greater MKD) compared to other bands (p < 0.01). Males exhibited less MKD compared to females during the BBS for each resistance band (p = 0.04). Males produced greater VL activity when using the black and gold resistance bands during the BBS (p = 0.03). When using a gold resistance band, the GMe muscle activation was higher compared to other resistance bands (p < 0.01). VM muscle activity was reduced when using a gold resistance band compared to no band condition (p < 0.01). BF (p = 0.39) and ES (p = 0.88) muscle activity did not change when using different resistance bands. As a result, females may be at a biomechanical disadvantage when using resistance bands compared to males while performing the BBS hindering them from optimal performance.
... While performing squat exercises using a bar, the position of the bar can be changed depending on the purpose of the exercise or the target muscle [10,11]. These squat exercise methods include back squats, overhead squats, and front squats, of which back squats are most commonly performed during weight training in gyms and rehabilitation centers [12,13]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to investigate the effect of the load and bar position on trunk and lower extremity muscle activity during squat exercise. High bar back squats (HBBS) and low bar back squats (LBBS) were performed in random order at 50%, 60%, and 70% loads of one repetition maximum by 28 experienced healthy adult men who had been performing squats for at least one year. Before the experiment, the maximal voluntary contraction of the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, rectus abdominis, transverse abdominis, external oblique, and erector spinae muscles was measured by means of surface electromyography. In addition, eccentric and concentric exercises were performed for 3 s each to measure the muscle activity. There was a significant difference in muscle activity according to the load for all muscles in the eccentric and concentric phases (p < 0.05), indicating that muscle activity increased as the load increased. In addition, in the comparison between HBBS and LBBS, significant differences were shown in all lower extremity muscles and all trunk muscles except for the external oblique in the concentric phase according to the bar position (p < 0.05). HBBS showed a higher muscle activity of the lower extremity in the eccentric and concentric phases than in LBBS, while LBBS showed a higher muscle activity of the trunk muscle in the eccentric and concentric phases than in HBBS (p < 0.05). HBBS requires more force in the lower extremity than LBBS and is particularly advantageous in strengthening the muscular strength of the quadriceps. In contrast, LBBS requires more muscle activity in the trunk than HBBS and is more effective in carrying heavier loads because of the advantage of body stability. This study suggests that rehabilitation experts apply the bar position and load as important variables affecting the intensity and method of training for target muscle strengthening of the lower extremities and trunk.
... [3,4] Another squat variation which is commonly used in athlete population is the overhead http://annalsofrscb.ro squat. [5] Wrong movement patterns such as medio lateral rotation of the hip, the knee alignment inside or outside the hip during the movement provokes the amount of compressive and shear forces at the ankle, knee and hip joints [6,7] and this likely increases the chances of injuries. Common problems with reduced ankle flexibility is that it limits joint ROM and affects kinematics and kinetics of the hip and knee during overhead squat. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Altered or poor mechanics of movement creates tissue damage and stress leading to overuse injuries. It was observed that athletes with muscle imbalance had decreased playing performance and were at risk for injuries. Tight post chain structures could probably lead to altered mechanics of the overhead squat. Aim: To know whether giving a wedge beneath the heels partly nullifies the tightness in the posterior chain and improves the mechanics of the overhead squat. Methods: 30 collegiate male athletes from cricket, football and basketball were taken with a mean age of (21.37 + 2.34) years. All of them performed five overhead squats with and without a two inch wooden wedge kept beneath the heels. Results: We found shoulder flexion to improve by 3.27⁰ (+ 7. 79⁰) with the presence of a two inch wedge. Statistically significant (p = 0.024) difference was noted in shoulder flexion (46.32+ 9.58), Hip flexion (98.88+ 17.43) and (p= 0.0002), Knee flexion (114.27+ 21.79) and (p= 0.006), Ankle dorsiflexion (46.32+ 9.58) and (p= <0.0001) and the results were statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on our results, there was an increase in the range available for dorsiflexion at the ankle with the use of two inch wedge resulted in following kinematic changes: decreased shoulder flexion, increased knee flexion and increased hip flexion. The significant change in hip flexion after the use of wedge can be attributed to the shift in the center of gravity entirely.
... Prior to the attachment of the surface electrodes, the skin was abraded with a skin abrasive and alcohol was applied to reduce the skin impedance to < 2 kΩ. Surface electrodes (BlueSensor N-00-S, METS Co., Japan) of a diameter of 8-mm, were attached to each muscle belly, which was parallel to the muscle fiber, for the RA, 3 cm lateral to the umbilicus (9) ; for the EO, 15 cm lateral to the umbilicus (9) ; for the IO, 1 cm medial and downward to the anterior superior iliac spine (10) ; for the LES, 3 cm lateral to the L3 spinous process (9) ; for the LMF, 2 cm lateral to the L5 spinous process (11) ; for the GMax, the midpoint of the sacral vertebra and greater trochanter (12) ; for the BF, the midpoint of the ischial tuberosity and the lateral condyle of the femur on the posterior side of the thigh (13) ; for the RF, the midpoint of the anterior inferior iliac spine and the patella on the anterior side of the thigh (13). The inter-electrode distance was 20 mm. ...
Article
This study aimed to clarify the changes in the activity of the trunk and lower limb muscles during 2000-m rowing. Ten male rowers performed a 2000-m race simulation on a rowing ergometer. Electromyography results of the abdominal muscles, back muscles, gluteus maximus (GMax), biceps femoris (BF), and rectus femoris (RF) were recorded. The electromyographic activity during the three strokes after the start (initial stage), at 1000m (middle stage), and before the end (final stage) were analyzed. From the handle position, the rowing motion was divided into five phases (early-drive, middle-drive, late-drive, early-recovery, and late-recovery). The peak activities of the abdominal muscles, back muscles, GMax, and BF in each stroke of the rowing motion were delayed at the middle and final stages compared to the initial stage (P<0.05). The peak activity of the RF was observed in the late-drive phase at the initial stage, whereas a high RF activity was observed in the middle-drive phase at the middle and final stages (P<0.05). Considering the results of the activity of the back muscles and RF, RF muscular endurance enhancement may lead to a decrease in the load on the back muscles and help prevent muscular low back pain in rowers. J. Med. Invest. 69 : 45-50, February, 2022.
... In conclusion, the many research explains a number of areas where the overhead squat may be considered as a method for screening movement quality. Notable differences in Ground reaction forces 2 , joint positions, kinematic interpretation and muscle activation have been depicted, suggesting that multiple considerations do exist for this one screening assessment [4][5][6]. In future, further studies are needed to utilize the overhead squat assessment as a screening method in varying population, so that the merits and demerits of the overhead squat assessment screening method can be dealt. ...
... The back squat is commonly used to target muscle groups in the hip and knee, often to correct muscle imbalances [6,11,25,26]. Several studies have examined the muscle activity of the squat during varied loading conditions, though they focused on topics such as stance width, squat type, or tempo of the lift; not the interaction of prime mover and synergist muscles across training loads [27][28][29][30]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine peak muscle activity across varied training loads in the VL, vastus medialis (VM), RM, GM, semitendinosus (ST), and biceps femoris (BF) muscles during the back squat to describe the interaction of prime mover and synergist muscles. ...
Article
Full-text available
PurposeCorrecting movement syndromes requires utilizing compound movements which maximally activate prime mover muscles such as the gluteus maximus (GM). This study aimed to examine prime mover and synergist muscle activity at varied training loads during the back squat, a common lower body corrective and training exercise.Methods Muscle activity was examined using surface electromyography in the GM, rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF), vastus medialis (VM), and semitendinosus (ST) at six intensities (10% intervals) from 40 to 90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) during the back squat. Repeated measures ANOVAs were utilized in statistical analysis.ResultsTraining load had a significant effect on the GM, RF, and VL (p < 0.05) during the descending phase and the VL, RF, GM, BF, and ST (p < 0.05) during the ascending phase of the back squat. The GM produced the greater muscle activity at 80% and 90% of 1RM than at 1RM during the ascending phase. The VM produced greater muscle activity at 80% of 1RM than at 1RM in both phases of the back squat. All other muscles were maximally activated at 1RM.Conclusions These results suggest that when utilizing the back squat as a corrective exercise, the prime movers VM and GM are maximally activated at training loads of 80–90% of 1RM. After this point, synergist muscles are utilized to complete the movement, potentially lowering the muscle activity of the VM or GM.
... In each task, the caregivers' stability is maintained through muscle activation while distributing the own body weight evenly before standing up from a seated position as well as lifting the simulated patient (13 kg)/the patient (63 kg). In accordance with literature findings (Yavuz and Erdag, 2017;Aspe and Swinton, 2014;Paoli et al., 2009;Boyden et al., 2000;McCaw and Melrose, 1999), mean muscle activity increases with lifting higher loads in our experimental case study. A more consistent mean activity of the quadriceps and hamstring musculature is indicated, as the load to be lifted gets higher. ...
Conference Paper
Manual patient handling is a challenging part of daily care and leads to high mechanical loads as well as to the development of degenerative diseases, e.g. lower back pain. To prevent musculoskeletal overload effects, the use of ergonomic working techniques is essential as well as improving caregivers’ functional ability. However, most of the studies do not consider these aspects and biomechanical evaluations including dynamic electromyography (EMG) are rarely analyzed. In this work, we focus on the quantification of lower limb EMG muscle activation patterns of healthy caregiver students in an experimental setup. The extent of lifting different loads ergonomically is analyzed and similarities/dissimilarities of dynamic EMG data of three lower limb muscles are investigated via cross-correlation calculation. One of the main findings of our investigation is an indication of a more consistent mean activity of the quadriceps and hamstring musculature, as the load to be lifted increases. Furthermore, we found an intra- as well as an interindividual similarity of EMG muscle activation patterns regarding time and shape of the signals generated during all of the conducted lifting tasks with a predominantly high cross-correlation coefficient for the selected muscles of the lower limb.
... Bearing in mind that under the same volume, higher loads entail higher muscle activation levels (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;McBride et al., 2002), it is necessary to evaluate the movements under a biomechanical perspective to understand the variation with higher activation levels. As previously reported (see "deadlift variations" section) in the sumo and conventional deadlift the bar is in contact with the body, and the centre of mass of the body moves altogether with the bar (i.e. ...
Article
Full-text available
The deadlift is one of the most widely used resistance exercises by different types of trainees and with different aims including aesthetics, performance and health. There are numerous variations of the deadlift exercise which have different effects on the exercise biomechanics and muscular activation. The main objective of this research was to systematically review the literature looking forward to gathering data on the muscular activation on the lower limbs with different variations of the deadlift exercise (conventional, sumo, Romanian, straight legs and hex-bar). 19 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Quality of the articles was assessed through the PEDro scale. Main findings were that deadlift is a posterior-chain dominant exercise. Changes in activation between the variations majorly depend on the hip flexion in relation to the knee flexion. For instance, the straight-legs deadlift does not involve knee flexion and mainly activates hip extensors. Other factors such as the distance between the load and the centre of mass, the knee flexion planes, or the total intensity also condition the muscular activation. For example, the hex-bar deadlift allows the subject being in alignment with the load and performing the exercise with relatively vertical back, which provokes an increase on the activation of the knee extensors. In conclusion, this study may help the strength and conditioning professionals and practitioners with the exercise selection depending on the muscular targets and the individual characteristics of the athlete. Keywords: Electromyographic activity; Resistance exercise; Quadriceps; Gluteus; Hamstrings; Calves.
... We reported that muscles of the lower limb have been investigated more than trunk muscles, i.e. hamstring and quadriceps activation data were reported more than any other muscle groups (Clark et al. 2012). Furthermore, we and others have investigated trunk stabilizer muscle activation in the back squat and established that activation is greater in concentric compared to eccentric phase and activation increases with increases in external load (Hamlyn et al. 2007;Nuzzo et al. 2008;Schwanbeck et al. 2009;Comfort et al. 2011;Aspe and Swinton 2014;Clark et al. 2016Clark et al. , 2020. We also showed that trunk muscle activation in loaded barbell squat was highest in the deepest range of both eccentric and concentric phases (Clark et al. 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose In this study we measured neural activation (EMG) in four trunk stabilizer muscles and vastus lateralis (VL) in trained and novice participants during a set of squat repetitions to volitional fatigue at 85% 1RM. Methods Forty males were recruited into two groups, novice (NG: n = 21) and experienced (EG: n = 19), according to relative squat 1RM. Participants were tested twice to: (1) determine squat 1RM, and (2) complete a single set of repetitions to volitional fatigue at 85% 1RM. Relative squat 1RM; NG < 140% body mass, EG > 160% body mass. Neuromuscular activation was measured by EMG for the following: rectus abdominus (RA), external oblique (EO), lumbar sacral erector spinae (LSES), upper lumbar erector spinae (ULES) and VL in eccentric and concentric phase. Completed repetitions, RPE and EMG in repetition 1 and at 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% of completed repetitions were analysed. Results No group differences were found between number repetitions completed and RPE in repetitions to volitional fatigue at 85% 1RM. Neuromuscular activation increased significantly in all muscle groups in eccentric and concentric phase apart from RA in the eccentric phase. Trunk neuromuscular activation was higher in NG compared to EG and this was significant in EO, LSES and ULES in eccentric phase and LSES in the concentric phase. VL activation increased in both phases with no group differences. Conclusion Trunk neuromuscular activation increases in a fatiguing set of heavy squats regardless of training status. Increased back squat strength through training results in lower neuromuscular activation despite greater absolute external squat loads.
... In particular, the hamstring muscles are of bi-articular nature, occupy the posterior compartment of the thigh crossing both the hip and the knee joints. During the downward phase of the FW-squat, the trunk segment progressively leans forward and rotates around the hip horizontal axis thus requiring the hamstring muscles to forcefully act in an eccentric mode so to provide an adequate force absorption and contribute to control the augmented negative body momentum (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;Dello Iacono et al., 2019;Maddigan et al., 2014). Finally, small to moderate non-significant relationships were found between the power outputs of the FW-squat test and SLJ, CMJ, and COD-5 m performances. ...
Article
word count: 200 13 Text-only word count: 4000 14 15 ABSTRACT 16 The aims of this study were to examine the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the 17 flywheel (FW)-squat test. Twenty male amateur team sports athletes (mean±SD: age 23±3 18 years) completed one familiarization session and two similar testing sessions including: FW-19 squat test with an inertial load of 0.061 kg. m 2 , standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement 20 jump (CMJ) and 5-m change of direction (COD-5m) tests, and isokinetic strength assessments 21 of the knee extensor and flexor muscles. Test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass 22 correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) of data collected. Construct 23 validity was determined as the degree of relationships between the FW-squat test outputs and 24 both athletic tests and isokinetic assessments scores computed with Pearson's correlation 25 coefficients. Excellent relative (ICC=0.94-0.95) and acceptable absolute (CV=5.9%-6.8%) 26 reliability scores were found for both concentric and eccentric power outputs collected during 27 the FW-squat test. The same outputs showed moderate to large positive correlations with 28 concentric and eccentric knee extensor and flexor muscle peak force values (r range: 0.465-29 0.566) measured during the isokinetic test. The FW-squat test is a valid and reliable test to 30 assess lower limb performance given its correlation with isokinetic test, as well as its excellent 31 relative and acceptable absolute reliability. 32
... Another finding of the present study was the higher EMG activity that was found in the concentric phase of the execution, compared to the eccentric phase. These results are in accordance with those of previous studies on muscle activity in exercises with motion patterns that were similar to those performed in the present study, such as Parallel back squats and Overhead squats [49]; Bilateral squat, Rear leg elevated split squat and Split squat [31]; or traditional Squat with chain and elastic bands [44]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Monopodal Squat, Forward Lunge and Lateral Step-Up exercises are commonly performed with one's own body weight for rehabilitation purposes. However, muscle activity evaluated using surface electromyography has never been analyzed among these three exercises. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to evaluate the amplitude of the EMG activity of the gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis and rectus femoris muscles in participants performing the Lateral Step-Up, Forward Lunge and Monopodal Squat exercises. A total of 20 physically active participants (10 men and 10 women) performed 5 repetitions at 60% (5 repetition maximum) in each of the evaluated exercises. The EMG amplitude was calculated in percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction. The Monopodal Squat exercise showed a higher EMG activity (p ≤ 0.001) in relation to the Lateral Step-Up and Forward Lunge exercises in all of the evaluated muscles (d > 0.6) except for the rectus femoris. The three exercises showed significantly higher EMG activity in all of the muscles that were evaluated in the concentric phase in relation to the eccentric one. In the three evaluated exercises, vastus lateralis and vastus medialis showed the highest EMG activity, followed by gluteus medius and gluteus maximus. The Monopodal Squat, Forward Lunge and Lateral Step-Up exercises not only are recommended for their rehabilitation purposes but also should be recommended for performance objectives and strength improvement in the lower limbs.
... The tendency for regular weight trainers to squat deeper than novices by utilising greater knee flexion ROM is also consistent with findings from earlier studies (Legg et al., 2017;Lorenzetti et al., 2018). Similarly, the significant effect of load on the maximum moment around L4/L5 was expected (Aspe & Swinton, 2014;Lorenzetti et al., 2018), as these data are influenced primarily by the combination of load and the horizontal position of the bar relative to L4/L5, where the latter was influenced strongly by trunk inclination (Walsh et al., 2007). Therefore, with minimal absolute changes in spinal curvature between the two loading conditions (< 5 deg), it would appear these maximum moments around L4/L5 were influenced primarily by the load on the bar. ...
Article
Full-text available
This research assessed the influence of various heel elevation conditions on spinal kinematic and kinetic data during loaded (25% and 50% of body weight) high-bar back squats. Ten novice (mass 67.6 ± 12.4 kg, height 1.73 ± 0.10 m) and ten regular weight trainers (mass 66.0 ± 10.7 kg, height 1.71 ± 0.09 m) completed eight repetitions at each load wearing conventional training shoes standing on the flat level floor (LF) and on an inclined board (EH). The regular weight training group performed an additional eight repetitions wearing weightlifting shoes (WS). Statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D) and repeated measures analysis of variance were used to assess differences in spinal curvature and kinetics across the shoe/floor conditions and loads. SPM1D analyses indicated that during the LF condition the novice weight trainers had greater moments around L4/L5 than the regular weight trainers during the last 20% of the lift (P < 0.05), with this difference becoming non-significant during the EH condition. This study indicates that from a perspective of spinal safety, it appears advantageous for novice weight trainers to perform back squats with their heels slightly elevated, while regular weight trainers appear to realize only limited benefits performing back squats with either EH or WS.
... It has also been shown that the MV correlated very closely with percent of 1RM in the back squat, providing a distinction of velocities at different loads (26). When comparing the back squat with an overhead squat, it was found that at equal relative intensities of 1RM, the overhead squat showed higher PV than the back squat (2). This is mainly due to the large absolute load difference between the comparison. ...
Article
Full-text available
Vantrease, WC, Townsend, JR, Sapp, PA, Henry, RN, and Johnson, KD. Maximal strength, muscle activation, and bar velocity comparisons between squatting with a traditional or safety squat bar. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2020-The purpose of this study was to compare strength, muscle activation, and bar velocity between the traditional (TRAD) and safety squat bar (SSB) back squat. Thirty-two men (21.94 ± 3.1 years, 1.78 ± 0.8 m, 81.7 ± 10.1 kg) volunteered to complete this randomized, crossover-design study. Subjects completed 2 separate 1 repetition maximum (1RM) sessions using either the TRAD or SSB. Subsequently, subjects completed 1 session of 3 repetitions at 65 and 85% of their 1RM for each squat condition (SSB & TRAD). Peak muscle activation of 7 muscles from the lower body and trunk was recorded through surface electromyography (EMG), and mean velocity (MV) was recorded by a linear transducer. Electromyography and MV were analyzed by a 2 × 2 (bar × load) repeated-measures analysis of variance. A Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship of 1RM load between bars. Squat 1RM was significantly higher (p < 0.001; 11.6%) for TRAD (144.7 kg) compared with SSB (128.8 kg), and a strong correlation (r = 0.94) was observed between 1RM values of each bar. A significant main effect was seen in EMG (p < 0.001) and MV for load (p < 0.001). No significant bar × load interaction was observed between conditions for any EMG or bar velocity measure (p > 0.05). The SSB produces similar muscle activation and bar velocities compared with the TRAD at relative intensities. However, absolute loads should be adjusted when changing squat bars during a training cycle.
... However, some older adults may have difficulty performing the crunch. In this case, isometric exercises such as the front plank may be a viable alternative, since they activate the rectus and obliques [75]. In the frailer elderly who have difficulty performing the front plank, the exercise can be regressed by supporting the arms higher (i.e., in a bench). ...
Article
Full-text available
Resistance training has been widely recommended as a strategy to enhance the functional autonomy and quality of life in older individuals. Among the variables that comprise a training session, the selection of exercises stands out as an important consideration for the elderly. Although a wide range of resistance exercise options exists, current guidelines generally do not indicate which exercises should be included and which muscles should be prioritized when prescribing training for older individuals. Therefore, given the lack of evidence-based information on the topic, this paper endeavors to establish recommendations to help guide the prescription of resistance exercises for older adults.
... The squat is a commonly used exercise to improve lower extremity strength in rehabilitation and fitness (Anderson et al, 1998;Cheatham et al, 2017;Escamilla et al., 2001;Fry et al, 2003;Jung et al., 2017;McCurdy et al, 2005). Squat exercises lead to high activation in the knee extensor and hip extensor, and are used to improve squat ability such as maximal squat strength (Aspe and Swinton, 2014;Bazyler et al, 2014). Squat ability is required for weightlifters and basketball players, who must re-peatedly perform squatting actions, and short track runners, speed skaters, and wrestlers, among others, who need to hold a squat position (Fry et al, 2003). ...
... In barbell hack squat the subject holds a barbell behind his back, stands straight while the elbows are fully extended and the in the zercher squat the bar is hold in the crook of the elbows and squat. Different applications of squat exercise have been investigated and/or compared in terms of kinetics, kinematics and muscle activation [7,[9][10][11][15][16][17][18]. Gullet et al. evaluated knee biomechanics and muscle activities during back and front squat. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
The importance of Electromyography (EMG) signals analysis with advanced methodologies is increasing in biomedics, clinical diagnosis and biomechanics and it becomes a required practice for many scientists from both health and engineering fields. The squat is a very important exercise for improving athletic performance and for prevention and rehabilitation of injuries. It has many different variations which are supposedly focusing on different muscles. We aimed to compare vastus medialis, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, gluteus maximus, semitendinosus, biceps femoris and erector spinae EMG activities during popular squat variations while the participants (14 healthy males, 23.7 ± 2.7 years-old) were performing 6 repetitions of front squat, back squat, hack squat, sumo squat and zercher squat with 60% of the 1 repetition maximum loading. Muscle EMG activities during different variations were compared by using Repeated measures ANOVA. The highest rectus femoris, vastus lateralis and vastus medialis EMG activities were observed during front squat with a significant difference with Zercher squat. EMG activities of Erector spinae and semitendinosus during Hack squat were significantly lower than all other squat variations (p < 0.05). These findings may suggest that front squat may be chosen to focus on quadriceps muscles while Hack squat may be a good choice for better knee and spinal stabilization.
... This movement allows great dynamic activation of the quadriceps and buttocks 23 , responsible for primary actions of the joints of knee and hip, respectively. In addition, this movement also offers effective participation in the capacity of activation of the trunk muscles 24 . Recently, it has been observed that after a period of seven weeks of resistive exercise program by performing the movements of squatting and dead lift 65% of maximum capacity, three sets of 8-10 repetitions, an interval of two minutes between the series and two sessions/week, there was significant improvement in functional capacity of elderly women 25 . ...
Article
Resistance exercise has been widely recommended for elderly population, since this type of exercise induces important health benefits, especially to improve functional capacity and preserve muscle mass, thus reflecting on the quality of life of older individuals. Among the several components of the resistance exercises the selection of movements to be performed is one of the most important and must be carefully analyzed. Although there may be a wide range of options, the most important recommendations do not specifically indicate the movements that should be included and muscle groups that should be prioritized when prescribing resistance exercise for the elderly. Therefore, considering that there is a lack of information for the Physical Education professional about the topic, this study was developed to support the choices of the movements that will compose the resistance exercise program for the elderly. The study was carried out by compiling and analyzing assumptions and scientific evidences related to resistance exercises and needs of elderly individuals. In conclusion, the choice of movements should be based on the principles of kinesiology, the needs of the elderly, muscle action and exercise safety in order to obtain beneficial results for general health and attenuate possible risks.Keywords: Exercise. Aging. Physical Exertion.ResumoO exercício resistido vem sendo amplamente recomendado para população idosa, uma vez que esse tipo de exercício físico induz a importantes benefícios para saúde; sobretudo, no aprimoramento da capacidade funcional e na preservação da massa muscular, refletindo, desse modo, na qualidade de vida do indivíduo idoso. Dentre os diversos componentes dos exercícios resistidos, a seleção dos movimentos a serem executados é um dos mais importantes e deve ser cuidadosamente analisado. Embora possa existir vasta gama de opções, as principais recomendações não indicam especificamente os movimentos que devem ser incluídos e os grupos musculares que devem ser priorizados nos programas de exercícios resistidos. Portanto, considerando haver uma lacuna de informações sobre o tema, o estudo foi realizado com intuito de subsidiar a seleção dos movimentos que deverão compor os programas de exercícios resistidos para idosos. O estudo foi realizado mediante compilação e análise de pressupostos e evidências científicas referentes aos exercícios resistidos e as necessidades dos idosos. Concluiu-se que a seleção dos movimentos deve ser baseada nos princípios da cinesiologia, nas necessidades dos idosos, na ação muscular e na segurança de execução para se alcançar resultados benéficos para saúde em geral e atenuar possíveis riscos.Palavras-chave: Exercício. Envelhecimento. Esforço Físico.
... Specialist strength training, e.g. weightlifting involves other types of squats enabling the strengthening of the entire body, i.e. overhead squats [1]. Subject-related reference publications often emphasize that anthropometry and ranges of movements are some of the most important variables aecting the making of a squat with a barbell [23]. ...
Chapter
The research work aimed to identify and analyse reactions in the joints of the lower limb as well as in the intervertebral joints of the lumbar spine when lifting weights and making a squat. The determination of loads of the skeletal-muscular system involved the performance of simulations in the AnyBody software programme. Input data used in the research-related tests came from the tests concerning the kinematics of weightlifting by a weightlifter. The use of mathematical modelling and static optimisation methods made it possible to identify resultant responses in the joints in individual positions of a squat made under various external loads. The highest resultant responses in all of the joints subjected to analysis were identified at an angle of \(135^{\circ }\) in knee joints. As a result, it is important to pay attention during training not to stop moving during an exercise at the above-named angle.
... The supposition that sEMG amplitude is equal to the relative load of an exercise may be true for some isometric muscle actions when performed in the same position to which sEMG has been normalized (Alkner et al., 2000), although not always (see section Acute and Mechanistic Variables) (Potvin et al., 1996). However, in the context of dynamic exercises, or when positions differ from the normalization position, this relationship does not hold (Aspe and Swinton, 2014;Calatayud et al., 2015;Vigotsky et al., 2015). Accordingly, there is no basis to assume that loading recommendations can be extrapolated to sEMG amplitude recommendations. ...
Preprint
Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a popular research tool in sports and rehabilitation sciences. Common study designs include the comparison of sEMG amplitudes collected from different muscles as participants perform various exercises and techniques under different loads. Based on such comparisons, researchers attempt to draw conclusions concerning the neuro- and electrophysiological underpinning of force production, and hypothesize about possible longitudinal adaptations, such as strength and hypertrophy. However, such conclusions are frequently unsubstantiated and unwarranted. Hence, the goal of this review is to discuss what can and cannot be inferred from comparative research designs as it pertains to both the acute and longitudinal outcomes. General methodological recommendations are made, gaps in the literature are identified, and lines for future research to help improve the applicability of sEMG are suggested.
... With respect to exercise interventions, the squat offers one opportunity to target the capacity of the gluteus maximus and the adductors (Pereira et al., 2010). In contrast to these mono-articular synergists, the BFlh is only moderately active during the squat (Aspe and Swinton, 2014;Ebben et al., 2000;Schoenfeld, 2010), due to the small net change in this hamstring's length during the coupled hip and knee actions (Wright et al., 1999). A deeper squat, performed with a wider foot placement places further bias upon the gluteus maximus (Caterisano et al., 2002;Paoli et al., 2009), and the adductors (Pereira et al., 2010), in respect to other lower limb synergists. ...
Article
A synergistic algebra appears to be at play in the body, sustaining an athlete's performance in the face of competing demands, yet these may be associated with risk. Akin to the employment of redundancy within engineering sciences, we suggest this phenomenon can be strategically harnessed through careful consideration of programme scheduling, contraction profiles and exercise design to share the work amongst other tissues and access the plasticity evident within the movement system. Tabled 1 SynergistsPrimary Focus Biceps Femoris Long Head, Semimembranosus Sagittal plane, eccentric force production, fascicle elongation Semitendinosus, Biceps Femoris Short Head, Popliteus Sagittal and transverse plane fatigue tolerance Gluteus Maximus Sagittal plane, concentric force production and fascicle shortening Adductor Magnus Tri-planar eccentric force production, fascicle elongation Gastrocnemius Increased stiffness facilitating enhanced force transfer and tendon contribution Oblique abdominals Tri-planar eccentric force production within small amplitudes of muscle length around lumbo-pelvic neutral alignment Specific muscles in the management of hamstring injuries for repeat sprint athletes (footballers). • Open table in a new tab
Article
Clinical Question : Does reactive neuromuscular training (RNT) increase gluteal muscle activation during squatting movements? Clinical Bottom Line : The current best evidence suggests RNT may result in acute increases of gluteus maximus and gluteus medius muscle activation when performing the barbell back squat exercise; however, the findings were inconsistent and unclear for other types of squatting movements. Grades B and D evidence exists on the effects of RNT to increase gluteus maximus and medius muscle activation, respectively, during squatting movements. Given the methodological differences and mixed findings reported in this critically appraised topic, practitioners should carefully consider whether using RNT would be appropriate for a given clinical scenario.
Article
Collins, KS, Klawitter, LA, Waldera, RW, Mahoney, SJ, and Christensen, BK. Differences in muscle activity and kinetics between the goblet squat and landmine squat in men and women. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2021-Squat exercise variations are widely used and extensively researched. However, little information exists on the goblet squat (GBS) and landmine squat (LMS) and differences between men and women. This study investigated the differences in muscle activity and kinetics between the GBS and the LMS in 16 men and 16 women. Five repetitions of each squat type were performed loaded at 30% of their body mass. Vertical and anteroposterior ground reaction forces for the eccentric and concentric phases and peak vertical force were recorded with a force plate. Electromyographic (EMG) signals were recorded for the vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), semitendinosus (ST), and biceps femoris (BF). Normalized mean EMG values and ground reaction forces were analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Significant main effects for squat condition and sex were found. The LMS reduced activity in the quadriceps (VM and VL) muscles and vertical forces, while increasing posterior horizontal forces. In the LMS, men showed decreased ST activity, whereas women had decreased BF activity. Women exhibited greater quadriceps activity in both the GBS and LMS and greater ST in the LMS. Women also produced greater eccentric vertical force in both the GBS and LMS and less posterior horizontal forces in the LMS. The LMS may be useful to balance hamstring to quadriceps activity, increase horizontal loading, and reduce vertical loading. Conversely, the GBS can better target quadriceps activity and increase vertical loading. Sex differences should be considered for training programs that include the GBS and LMS.
Article
Full-text available
Compared to back squat (BSQ), front squat (FSQ) exhibits a smaller anterior trunk tilt to avoid dropping a barbell held in front of the body, which may lead to increase trunk extension and lumbar lordosis. This study aimed to clarify the differences in the lumbar lordosis angle, anterior trunk tilt angle, and muscle activities of the lower limb and trunk between the FSQ and BSQ. Ten healthy men participated in this study. The participants performed parallel and full FSQ and BSQ. The SQ motion was recorded using three-dimensional motion-capture cameras, and divided into four phases. The lumbar lordosis angle, anterior trunk tilt angle, and lower limb and trunk muscles activity were analyzed. Independent t-tests were used to compare the minimum lumbar lordosis angle and maximum anterior trunk tilt angle between the FSQ and BSQ in each SQ depth. Two-way analysis of variances (barbell positions × phases) were used to compare the mean lumbar lordosis angle and each muscle activity in each phase between the FSQ and BSQ in each SQ depth. The lumbar lordosis angle was significantly larger during FSQ than during BSQ at the minimum value and the mean value in each phase, regardless of depths (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the maximum anterior trunk tilt angle and muscle activities of the lower limb and trunk between the FSQ and BSQ in both depths (P > 0.05). These results are the basis for proposing an appropriate SQ style using the FSQ and BSQ to prevent low back pain.
Article
Full-text available
Background Differences in the muscular activity between the high-bar back squat (HBBS) and the low-bar back squat (LBBS) on the same representative group of experienced powerlifters are still scarcely investigated. The main purpose of the study was to compare the normalized bioelectrical activity and maximal angles within single homogeneous group between the HBBS and LBBS for 60% one repetition maximum (1RM), 65% 1RM and 70% 1RM. Methods Twelve healthy men (age 24.3 ± 2.8 years, height 178.8 ± 5.6 cm, body mass 88.3 ± 11.5 kg), experienced in powerlifting performed HBBS and LBBS with comparable external loads equal 60% 1RM, 65% 1RM, and 70% 1RM. Electromyography (EMG) signals of muscle groups were synchronously recorded alongside kinematic data (joints angle) by means of a motion capture system. Results EMG activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than in HBBS for all selected muscles (60% 1RM and 65% 1RM) (p < 0.05). All examined muscles were more activated during concentric phase of the squat cycle (p < 0.05). In the concentric phase, significant differences between the loads were generally not observed between just 5% 1RM change in load level for LBBS. Conclusions Our results confirmed significant differences in muscles activation between both squat techniques. Muscle activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than HBBS. The differences are crucial for posterior muscle chain during eccentric phase of squat cycle.
Article
Full-text available
En el alto nivel la detección del riesgo de lesión resulta crucial para alcanzar el éxito deportivo. Para ello, los equipos técnicos suelen buscar herramientas sencillas, económicas y que doten de mucha información, tales como los tests funcionales y registros de lesiones. Por lo tanto, los objetivos de este estudio fueron describir tanto las lesiones previas como las compensaciones manifestadas por jugadoras de fútbol en patrones básicos de movimiento, así como analizar la relación entre estas lesiones y los patrones motores fundamentales analizados. En este estudio de cohortes retrospectivo participaron 16 jugadoras de fútbol de segunda división [Edad: 22±4,11 años; práctica federada: 10±4,49 años]. Se evaluaron los patrones motores básicos mediante la Valoración Funcional Básica (VAFB) y se cumplimentó un cuestionario sobre las lesiones de la temporada anterior. Nueve jugadoras (56,25%) sufrieron alguna lesión, de entre las cuales ocho (88,89%) se localizaron en el miembro inferior y la mayoría de lesiones se produjeron por sobreuso, sin contacto (n=7). Los porcentajes medios de compensaciones y asimetrías en la VAFB fueron de 65,79%±11,80 y 15,30%±4,82, respectivamente. Los resultados de la valoración funcional fueron ligeramente mejores para las jugadoras que no sufrieron lesión, aunque las diferencias no fueron significativas [t=-,605; p=,555]. Los resultados de la VAFB podrían ser empleados en el diseño de programas preventivos individualizados en fútbol femenino.
Article
Full-text available
Influencia de las lesiones previas en los patrones fundamentales del movimiento en jugadoras profesionales de fútbol Influence of previous injuries on fundamental movement patterns in professional female soccer players Resumen En el alto nivel la detección del riesgo de lesión resulta crucial para alcanzar el éxito deportivo. Para ello, los equipos técnicos suelen buscar herramientas sencillas, económicas y que doten de mucha información, tales como los tests funcionales y registros de lesiones. Por lo tanto, los objetivos de este estudio fueron describir tanto las lesiones previas como las compensaciones manifestadas por jugadoras de fútbol en patrones bási-cos de movimiento, así como analizar la relación entre estas lesiones y los patrones motores fundamentales analizados. En este estudio de cohortes retrospectivo participaron 16 jugadoras de fútbol de segunda división [Edad: 22±4,11 años; práctica federada: 10±4,49 años]. Se evaluaron los patrones motores básicos mediante la Valoración Funcional Básica (VAFB) y se cumplimentó un cuestionario sobre las lesiones de la temporada anterior. Nueve jugadoras (56,25%) sufrieron alguna lesión, de entre las cuales ocho (88,89%) se localizaron en el miembro inferior y la mayoría de lesiones se produjeron por sobreuso, sin contacto (n=7). Los porcentajes medios de compensaciones y asimetrías en la VAFB fueron de 65,79%±11,80 y 15,30%±4,82, respectivamen-te. Los resultados de la valoración funcional fueron ligeramente mejores para las jugadoras que no sufrieron lesión, aunque las diferencias no fueron significativas [t=-,605; p=,555]. Los resultados de la VAFB podrían ser empleados en el diseño de programas preventivos individualizados en fútbol femenino. Palabras clave: patrón de movimiento; lesión, Valoración Funcional Básica; fútbol femenino; calidad de movimiento. Abstract At the high level, the detection of the risk of injury is crucial for sporting success. For this purpose, technical teams often look for simple, economical and informative tools, such as functional tests and injury records. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to describe both the previous injuries and the compensations expressed by female football players in basic movement patterns, as well as to analyse the relationship between these injuries and the fundamental motor patterns analysed. This retrospective cohort study involved 16 second division female football players [Age: 22±4.11 years; federated practice: 10±4.49 years]. Basic motor patterns were evaluated using Basic Functional Assessment (BAFA) and a questionnaire on injuries from the previous season was completed. Nine players (56.25%) suffered some injury, among which eight (88.89%) were located in the lower limb and the majority of injuries were caused by overuse, without contact (n=7). The mean percentages of compensations and asymmetries in the VAFB were 65.79%±11.80 and 15.30%±4.82, respectively. Functional assessment results were slightly better for players who did not suffer injury, although the differences were not significant [t=-,605; p=,555]. The results of the VAFB could be used in the design of individualized preventive programs in women's soccer.
Chapter
Mortality rate increases exponentially with people’s age. They gather age-related diseases and become ‘frail’, i.e. increasingly vulnerable to various stressors. The gold standard to evaluate the severity of upper limb motor symptoms is to use the UPDRS-part III (motor examination) yet it is proven that simple tests of manual dexterity can identify persons at high risk for neurodegenerative diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate a novel, objective, observer-independent and assistance-independent tablet device-based method which could be helpful in the upper limb function diagnostics designed for telemedicine technology and frailty assessment. The test employs a tablet and a fixed-height obstacle. The patient is required to move his/her hand above the obstacle and touch the round fields displayed on the tablet. The test is performed for 30 s, as fast as possible, using pointing finger of the dominating hand. Several parameters are registered using the tablet. In the study, the test is evaluated in the group inpatients of geriatric hospital separated into Frail (14 patients) and Control (14 patients) groups. The patients in the Control group are featuring (Mann-Whitney U-test, p-value < 0.05) more correct touches (23.4±8.2 vs. 17.1±12.4) than the members of the Frail group. The reaction time and mean time between touches in Control group is shorter than in the Frail group (respectively Mann-Whitney U-test and Student’s t-test; p-value < 0.05).
Article
Context: Squats and lunges are common exercises frequently applied in muscle-strengthening and therapeutic exercises. The loading devices are often used to increase the training intensity. Objective: To determine the effect of loading devices on muscle activation in squat and lunge and to compare the differences in muscle activation between squat and lunge. Design: Cross-sectional cohort. Participants: Nineteen healthy, male, recreationally active individuals without a history of lower limb injury. Interventions: Each participant performed 10 repetitions of a squat under 5 conditions: unloaded, barbell, dumbbell, loaded vest, and kettlebell, and 10 repetitions of a lunge under 4 conditions: unloaded, barbell, dumbbell, and loaded vest. Main outcome measures: The electromyography signals of quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius lateralis and medialis were measured. One-way repeated-measure analysis of variance was used to compare the difference among different loading conditions. Paired t test was used to compare the difference between squat and lunge. Results: The muscle activation in the loaded conditions was significantly higher than that in nonloaded conditions in squat and lunge. Compared with the barbell, dumbbell, and loaded vest conditions, the semitendinosus showed significantly higher activation, and the tibialis anterior showed significantly lower activation in kettlebell condition in squat. No significant difference in muscle activation was found among barbell, dumbbell, and kettlebell conditions in lunge. In addition, quadriceps and hamstring activities were significantly higher in lunge than in squat. Conclusions: Muscle activation was affected by the loading devices in squat but not affected in lunge. Kettlebell squat could be suggested for targeting in strengthening medial hamstring. Progressive strengthening exercise could be recommended from squat to lunge based on sequential activation level.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of the investigation was to compare the kinematics and kinetics of the deadlift performed with 2 distinct barbells across a range of submaximal loads. Nineteen male powerlifters performed the deadlift with a conventional straight barbell and a hexagonal barbell that allowed the lifter to stand within its frame. Subjects performed trials at maximum speed with loads of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80% of their predetermined 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Inverse dynamics and spatial tracking of the external resistance were used to quantify kinematic and kinetic variables. Subjects were able to lift a heavier 1RM load in the hexagonal barbell deadlift (HBD) than the straight barbell deadlift (SBD) (265 ± 41 kg vs. 245 ± 39 kg, p < 0.05). The design of the hexagonal barbell significantly altered the resistance moment at the joints analyzed (p < 0.05), resulting in lower peak moments at the lumbar spine, hip, and ankle (p < 0.05) and an increased peak moment at the knee (p < 0.05). Maximum peak power values of 4,388 ± 713 and 4,872 ± 636 W were obtained for the SBD and HBD, respectively (p < 0.05). Across the submaximal loads, significantly greater peak force, peak velocity and peak power values were produced during the HBD compared to during the SBD (p < 0.05). The results demonstrate that the choice of barbell used to perform the deadlift has a significant effect on a range of kinematic and kinetic variables. The enhanced mechanical stimulus obtained with the hexagonal barbell suggests that in general the HBD is a more effective exercise than the SBD.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to compare rectus abdominis and erector spinae muscle activity during isometric (prone bridge [PB] and superman [SM]) and dynamic strengthening exercises (back squat, front squat [FS], and military press). Participants (n = 10, age 21.8 ± 2.6 years; body mass 82.65 ± 10.80 kg, 174.5± 7.2 cm), performed each exercise in a randomized order, using a repeated-measures design. Electromyographical (EMG) activity (sampling at 2,000 Hz) of the rectus abdominis (RA) and the erector spinae (ES) muscles was recorded throughout the duration of the exercises. Intraclass correlations demonstrated the highest levels of reliability for muscle activity during the isometric exercises; however, all exercises demonstrated high level of reliability (r = 0.764-0.998, p ≤ 0.01). The PB demonstrated significantly greater (p < 0.01) RA activity compared to all other exercises. The ES activity was significantly (p < 0.01) greater during the FS (1.010 ± 0.308 root mean square value [RMS (V)]) and SM (0.951 ± 0.217 RMS[V]) and compared to all other exercises, although there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the FS and the SM exercise. The PB may be the most suitable exercise for strengthening the RA, compared to dynamic exercises at a low to moderate load, because of a higher level of muscle activity. The FS may be a useful alternative to isometric exercises when strengthening the ES, because it results in slightly higher muscle activity levels when using only a light to moderate load. Because of the dynamic nature of the FS, this may also be more beneficial in transferring to activities of daily living and sporting environments.
Article
Full-text available
Resistance training while using an instability-training device is known to increase activation of stabilizing muscle groups while decreasing the force generated by the prime movers during isometric contractions. Purpose: To investigate differences in squat kinetics during dynamic resistance training in an increasingly unstable training environment. Fourteen active men participated in this study. In each testing session, each participant performed 3 repetitions of squats with a 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) resistance, 40% of their 10-RM resistance, and 20.45 kg. The 3 testing session consisted of standing on a stable floor, foam pads, or BOSU balls. All repetitions were recorded with an optical encoder to record barbell kinetics. The transition from stable (floor) to very unstable (BOSU) resulted in high likelihoods (>75%) of clinically meaningful differences ranging from small to large (effect size [ES] 0.31-1.73) in factors relating to concentric kinetics, eccentric power, and squat depth, regardless of the resistance used for training. There were also likely differences at the heaviest resistance in peak concentric power (stable to foam: ES 2.06; foam to BOSU: ES 0.38), eccentric power (stable to foam: ES 1.88; foam to BOSU: ES 0.74), and squat depth (stable to foam: ES 0.50; foam to BOSU: ES 0.67). Resistance training in an unstable environment at an intensity sufficient to elicit strength gains of the prime movers results in deleterious effects in concentric squat kinetics and squat technique. Such observations are particularly evident on very unstable platforms.
Article
Full-text available
The strength and stability of the knee plays an integral role in athletics and activities of daily living. A better understanding of knee joint biomechanics while performing variations of the squat would be useful in rehabilitation and exercise prescription. We quantified and compared tibiofemoral joint kinetics as well as muscle activity while executing front and back squats. Because of the inherent change in the position of the center of mass of the bar between the front and back squat lifts, we hypothesized that the back squat would result in increased loads on the knee joint and that the front squat would result in increased knee extensor and decreased back extensor muscle activity. A crossover study design was used. To assess the net force and torque placed on the knee and muscle activation levels, a combination of video and force data, as well as surface electromyographic data, were collected from 15 healthy trained individuals. The back squat resulted in significantly higher compressive forces and knee extensor moments than the front squat. Shear forces at the knee were small in magnitude, posteriorly directed, and did not vary between the squat variations. Although bar position did not influence muscle activity, muscle activation during the ascending phase was significantly greater than during the descending phase. The front squat was as effective as the back squat in terms of overall muscle recruitment, with significantly less compressive forces and extensor moments. The results suggest that front squats may be advantageous compared with back squats for individuals with knee problems such as meniscus tears, and for long-term joint health.
Article
Full-text available
Altering foot stance is often prescribed as a method of isolating muscles during the parallel squat. The purpose of this study was to compare activity in six muscles crossing the hip and/or knee joints when the parallel squat is performed with different stances and bar loads. Nine male lifters served as subjects. Within 7 d of determining IRM on the squat with shoulder width stance, surface EMG data were collected (800 Hz) from the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, adductor longus, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris while subjects completed five nonconsecutive reps of the squat using shoulder width, narrow (75% shoulder width), and wide (140% shoulder width) stances with low and high loads (60% and 75% 1RM, respectively). Rep time was controlled. A goniometer on the right knee was used to identify descent and ascent phases. Integrated EMG values were calculated for each muscle during phases of each rep, and the 5-rep means for each subject were used in a repeated measures ANOVA (phase x load x stance, alpha = 0.05). For rectus femoris, vastus medialis, and vastus lateralis, only the load effect was significant. Adductor longus exhibited a stance by phase interaction and a load effect. Gluteus maximus exhibited a load by stance interaction and a phase effect. Biceps femoris activity was highest during the ascent phase. The results suggest that stance width does not cause isolation within the quadriceps but does influence muscle activity on the medial thigh and buttocks.
Article
Full-text available
The objective of this study was to determine differences in electromyographic (EMG) activity of the soleus (SOL), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF), abdominal stabilizers (AS), upper lumbar erector spinae (ULES), and lumbo-sacral erector spinae (LSES) muscles while performing squats of varied stability and resistance. Stability was altered by doing the squat movement on a Smith machine, a free squat, and while standing on two balance discs. Fourteen male subjects performed the movements. Activities of the SOL, AS, ULES, and LSES were highest during the unstable squat and lowest with the Smith machine protocol (p < 0.05). Increased EMG activity of these muscles may be attributed to their postural and stabilization role. Furthermore, EMG activity was higher during concentric contractions compared to eccentric contractions. Performing squats on unstable surfaces may permit a training adaptation of the trunk muscles responsible for supporting the spinal column (i.e., erector spinae) as well as the muscles most responsible for maintaining posture (i.e., SOL).
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to examine the extent of activation in various trunk muscles during dynamic weight-training and isometric instability exercises. Sixteen subjects performed squats and deadlifts with 80% 1 repetition maximum (1RM), as well as with body weight as resistance and 2 unstable calisthenic-type exercises (superman and sidebridge). Electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured from the lower abdominals (LA), external obliques (EO), upper lumbar erector spinae (ULES), and lumbar-sacral erector spinae (LSES) muscle groups. Results indicated that the LSES EMG activity during the 80% 1RM squat significantly exceeded 80% 1RM deadlift LSES EMG activity by 34.5%. The LSES EMG activity of the 80% 1RM squat also exceeded the body weight squat, deadlift, superman, and sidebridge by 56, 56.6, 65.5, and 53.1%, respectively. The 80% 1RM deadlift ULES EMG activity significantly exceeded the 80% 1RM squat exercise by 12.9%. In addition, the 80% 1RM deadlift ULES EMG activity also exceeded the body weight squat, deadlift, superman, and sidebridge exercises by 66.7, 65.5, 69.3, and 68.6%, respectively. There were no significant changes in EO or LA activity. Therefore, the augmented activity of the LSES and ULES during 80% 1RM squat and deadlift resistance exercises exceeded the activation levels achieved with the same exercises performed with body weight and selected instability exercises. Individuals performing upright, resisted, dynamic exercises can achieve high trunk muscle activation and thus may not need to add instability device exercises to augment core stability training.
Article
Surface electromyography (EMG) has been used to estimate deep trunk muscle activity. However, it remains unknown whether surface EMG provides an accurate estimation of this activity. The purposes of this study were to compare surface and intramuscular EMG activity measurements and investigate the efficacy of surface EMG measurement for the transversus abdominis (TrA) and the multifidus (MF) muscles. Eight healthy men participated in the study. TrA and MF activities were simultaneously measured by both intramuscular and surface EMG during isometric trunk exercises. Spearman correlation coefficients for the relationship between the two activity measurements for the right TrA, left TrA, right MF, and left MF were 0.55, 0.36, 0.67, and 0.79, respectively. For the TrA, Bland–Altman plots revealed that mean differences between measurements obtained by intramuscular EMG and surface EMG were not close to zero, with a systematic bias toward higher surface EMG values. In conclusion, surface and intramuscular EMG activity measurements were strongly correlated for MF muscles, but poorly correlated for TrA muscles.
Article
The purpose of this article was to review a series of studies (n = 18) where muscle activation in the free barbell back squat was measured and discussed. The loaded barbell squat is widely used and central to many strength training programs. It is a functional and safe exercise that is obviously transferable to many movements in sports and life. Hence, a large and growing body of research has been published on various aspects of the squat. Training studies have measured the impact of barbell squat loading schemes on selected training adaptations including maximal strength and power changes in the squat. Squat exercise training adaptations and their impact on a variety of performance parameters, in particular countermovement jump, acceleration, and running speed, have also been reported. Furthermore, studies have reported on the muscle activation of the lower limb resulting from variations of squat depth, foot placement, training status, and training intensity. There have also been studies on the impact of squatting with or without a weight belt on trunk muscle activation (TMA). More recently, studies have reported on the effect of instability on TMA and squat performance. Research has also shown that muscle activation of the prime movers in the squat exercise increases with an increase in the external load. Also common variations such as stance width, hip rotation, and front squat do not significantly affect muscle activation. However, despite many studies, this information has not been consolidated, resulting in a lack of consensus about how the information can be applied. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to examine studies that reported muscle activation measured by electromyography in the free barbell back squat with the goal of clarifying the understanding of how the exercise can be applied.
Article
The purpose of this investigation was to determine if there was a difference in kinetic variables and muscle activity when comparing a squat to a box squat. A box squat removes the stretch-shortening cycle component from the squat, and thus, the possible influence of the box squat on concentric phase performance is of interest. Eight resistance trained men (Height: 179.61 ± 13.43 cm; Body Mass: 107.65 ± 29.79 kg; Age: 24.77 ± 3.22 years; 1 repetition maximum [1RM]: 200.11 ± 58.91 kg) performed 1 repetition of squats and box squats using 60, 70, and 80% of their 1RM in a randomized fashion. Subjects completed the movement while standing on a force plate and with 2 linear position transducers attached to the bar. Force and velocity were used to calculate power. Peak force and peak power were determined from the force-time and power-time curves during the concentric phase of the lift. Muscle activity (electromyography) was recorded from the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, biceps femoris, and longissimus. Results indicate that peak force and peak power are similar between the squat and box squat. However, during the 70% of 1RM trials, the squat resulted in a significantly lower peak force in comparison to the box squat (squat = 3,269 ± 573 N, box squat = 3,364 ± 575 N). In addition, during the 80% of 1RM trials, the squat resulted in significantly lower peak power in comparison to the box squat (squat = 2,050 ± 486 W, box squat = 2,197 ± 544 W). Muscle activity was generally higher during the squat in comparison to the box squat. In conclusion, minimal differences were observed in kinetic variables and muscle activity between the squat and box squat. Removing the stretch-shortening cycle during the squat (using a box) appears to have limited negative consequences on performance.
Article
An essential exercise for strength training of the lower limbs is the squat exercise. During this exercise, changes in lumbar lordosis are commonly used to indicate when the descent of the squat should cease, yet the behavior of the lumbar-scarum segments remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantify the lumbar-sacrum movements during the back squat, because the movement of the sacrum is influenced by the width of stance, this variable was also investigated. Thirty trained subjects, 18 men with 1 repetition maximum (1RM) squat of 123% (13.9%) of bodyweight and 12 women with 1RM squat of 93% (15.6%), performed a set of narrow and wide stance squats, each carrying an additional 50% of body weight as load. The timing and movement of the lumbar angle (T12/L1), sacrum angle (L5/S1), and lumbar flexion angle (lumbar lordosis) were measured in 3 dimensions for the ascent and decent phases. Men and women achieved similar lumbar angles for both width of stance and phase. Sacrum angles, lumbar flexion angles, and timing differed significantly (p < 0.05) between gender and width of stance. The lumbar flexion range during the descent phase for women in narrow and wide stance was 12.9° and 12.6°, respectively; for men, this range was significantly (p < 0.05) larger at 26.3° and 25.4°, respectively. Men and women developed different movement patterns for the squatting movement, and therefore, this needs to be considered in strength development and screening procedures. The lumbar spine became kyphotic as soon as a load was placed on the shoulders, and any teaching cues to maintain a curved lumbar spine when squatting must be questioned.
Article
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of stable and unstable conditions on one repetition maximum strength and muscle activity during dynamic squatting using absolute and relative loading. Ten recreationally weight-trained males participated in this study (age = 24.1 +/- 2.0 y, height = 178.0 +/- 5.6 cm, body mass = 83.7 +/- 13.4 kg, 1RM/body mass = 1.53 +/- 0.31), which involved two laboratory sessions separated by 1 wk. Linear position transducers were used to track bar displacement while subjects stood on a force plate for all trials. Vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF) and erector spinae (L1) muscle activity (average integrated EMG [IEMG]) was also recorded during all trials. During the first session subjects complete a one repetition maximum test in a stable dynamic squat (S1RM = 128.0 +/- 31.4 kg) and an unstable dynamic squat (U1RM = 83.8 +/- 17.3 kg) in a randomized order with a 30-min rest period between conditions. The second session consisted of the performance of three trials each for 12 different conditions (unstable and stable squats using three different absolute loads [six conditions] and unstable and stable squats using three different relative loads [six conditions]). Results revealed a statistically significant difference between S1RM and U1RM values (P < or = .05). The stable trials resulted in the same or a significantly higher value for VL, BF and L1 muscle activity in comparison with the unstable trials for all twelve conditions. Unstable squatting is of equal or less (depending on the loading condition) benefit to improving or maximizing muscle activity during resistance exercise.
Article
Controlled laboratory study. To clarify whether differences in surface stability influence trunk muscle activity. Lumbar stabilization exercises on unstable surfaces are performed widely. One perceived advantage in performing stabilization exercises on unstable surfaces is the potential for increased muscular demand. However, there is little evidence in the literature to help establish whether this assumption is correct. Nine healthy male subjects performed lumbar stabilization exercises. Pairs of intramuscular fine-wire or surface electrodes were used to record the electromyographic signal amplitude of the rectus abdominis, the external obliques, the transversus abdominis, the erector spinae, and lumbar multifidus. Five exercises were performed on the floor and on an unstable surface: elbow-toe, hand-knee, curl-up, side bridge, and back bridge. The EMG data were normalized as the percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction, and data between doing each exercise on the stable versus unstable surface were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. With the elbow-toe exercise, the activity level for all muscles was enhanced when performed on the unstable surface. When performing the hand-knee and side bridge exercises, activity level of the more global muscles was enhanced when performed on an unstable surface. Performing the curl-up exercise on an unstable surface, increased the activity of the external obliques but reduced transversus abdominis activation. This study indicates that lumbar stabilization exercises on an unstable surface enhanced the activities of trunk muscles, except for the back bridge exercise.
Article
In an attempt to mimic everyday activities that are performed in 3-dimensional environments, exercise programs have been designed to integrate training of the trunk muscles with training of the extremities. Many believe that the most effective way to recruit the core stabilizing muscles is to execute traditional exercise movements on unstable surfaces. However, physical activity is rarely performed with a stable load on an unstable surface; usually, the surface is stable, and the external resistance is not. The purpose of this study was to evaluate muscle activity of the prime movers and core stabilizers while lifting stable and unstable loads on stable and unstable surfaces during the seated overhead shoulder press exercise. Thirty resistance-trained subjects performed the shoulder press exercise for 3 sets of 3 repetitions under 2 load (barbell and dumbbell) and 2 surface (exercise bench and Swiss ball) conditions at a 10 repetition maximum relative intensity. Surface electromyography (EMG) measured muscle activity for 8 muscles (anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, trapezius, triceps brachii, rectus abdominis, external obliques, and upper and lower erector spinae). The average root mean square of the EMG signal was calculated for each condition. The results showed that as the instability of the exercise condition increased, the external load decreased. Triceps activation increased with external resistance, where the barbell/bench condition had the greatest EMG activation and the dumbbell/Swiss ball condition had the least. The upper erector spinae had greater muscle activation when performing the barbell presses on the Swiss ball vs. the bench. The findings provide little support for training with a lighter load using unstable loads or unstable surfaces.
Article
The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether free weight or Smith machine squats were optimal for activating the prime movers of the legs and the stabilizers of the legs and the trunk. Six healthy participants performed 1 set of 8 repetitions (using a weight they could lift 8 times, i.e., 8RM, or 8 repetition maximum) for each of the free weight squat and Smith machine squat in a randomized order with a minimum of 3 days between sessions, while electromyographic (EMG) activity of the tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, lumbar erector spinae, and rectus abdominus were simultaneously measured. Electromyographic activity was significantly higher by 34, 26, and 49 in the gastrocnemius, biceps femoris, and vastus medialis, respectively, during the free weight squat compared to the Smith machine squat (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between free weight and Smith machine squat for any of the other muscles; however, the EMG averaged over all muscles during the free weight squat was 43% higher when compared to the Smith machine squat (p < 0.05). The free weight squat may be more beneficial than the Smith machine squat for individuals who are looking to strengthen plantar flexors, knee flexors, and knee extensors.
Article
Many strength trainers believe that varying the stance width during the back squat can target specific muscles of the thigh. The aim of the present work was to test this theory measuring the activation of 8 thigh muscles while performing back squats at 3 stance widths and with 3 different bar loads. Six experienced lifters performed 3 sets of 10 repetitions of squats, each one with a different stance width, using 3 resistances: no load, 30% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM), and 70% 1RM. Sets were separated by 6 minutes of rest. Electromyographic (EMG) surface electrodes were placed on the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, gluteus medium, and adductor maior. Analysis of variance and Scheffè post hoc tests indicated a significant difference in EMG activity only for the gluteus maximus; in particular, there was a higher electrical activity of this muscle when back squats were performed at the maximum stance widths at 0 and 70% 1RM. There were no significant differences concerning the EMG activity of the other analyzed muscles. These findings suggest that a large width is necessary for a greater activation of the gluteus maximus during back squats.
Article
This study tested the possibility of obtaining the activity of deeper muscles in the torso—specifically psoas, quadratus lumborum, external oblique, internal oblique and transverse abdominis, using surfce myoelectric electrodes. It was hypothesized that: (1) surface electrodes adequately represent the amplitude of deep muscles (specifically psoas, quadratus lumborum, external oblique, internal oblique, transverse abdominis); (2) a single surface electrode location would best represent the activation profiles of each deep muscle over a broad variety of tasks. We assumed that prediction of activation within 10% of maximum voluntary contraction (RMS difference between the surface and intramuscular channels), over the time history of the signal, was reasonable and acceptable to assist clinical interpretation of muscle activation amplitude, and ultimately for modeled estimates of muscle force. Surface electrodes were applied and intramuscular electrodes were inserted on the left side of the body in five men and three women who then performed a wide variety of flexor tasks (bent knee and straight leg situps and leg raises, curl ups), extensor tasks (including lifting barbells up to 70 kg), lateral bending tasks (standing lateral bend and horizontal lying side support), twisting tasks (standing and sitting), and internal/external hip rotation. Using the criteria of RMS difference and the coefficient of determination (R²) to compare surface with intramuscular myoelectric signals, the results indicated that selected surface electrodes adequately represent the amplitude of deep muscles—always within 15% RMS difference, or less with the exception of psoas where differences up to 20% were observed but only in certain maximum voluntary contraction efforts.
Article
The purpose of this study was to measure the relative contributions of 4 hip and thigh muscles while performing squats at 3 depths. Ten experienced lifters performed randomized trials of squats at partial, parallel, and full depths, using 100-125% of body weight as resistance. Electromyographic (EMG) surface electrodes were placed on the vastus medialis (VMO), the vastus lateralis, (VL), the biceps femoris (BF), and the gluteus maximus (GM). EMG data were quantified by integration and expressed as a percentage of the total electrical activity of the 4 muscles. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc tests indicated a significant difference (p < 0.001*, p = 0.056**) in the relative contribution of the GM during the concentric phases among the partial- (16.9%*), parallel- (28.0%**), and full-depth (35.4%*) squats. There were no significant differences between the relative contributions of the BF, the VMO, and the VL at different squatting depths during this phase. The results suggest that the GM, rather than the BF, the VMO, or the VL, becomes more active in concentric contraction as squat depth increases.
Article
This study investigated whether electromyographic signals recorded from the skin surface overlying the multifidus muscles could be used to quantify their activity. Comparison of electromyography signals recorded from electrodes on the back surface and from wire electrodes within four different slips of multifidus muscles of three human subjects performing isometric tasks that loaded the trunk from three different directions. It has been suggested that suitably placed surface electrodes can be used to record activity in the deep multifidus muscles. We tested whether there was a stronger correlation and more consistent regression relationship between signals from electrodes overlying multifidus and longissimus muscles respectively than between signals from within multifidus and from the skin surface electrodes over multifidus. The findings provided consistent evidence that the surface electrodes placed over multifidus muscles were more sensitive to the adjacent longissimus muscles than to the underlying multifidus muscles. The R(2) for surface versus intra-muscular comparisons was 0.64, while the average R(2) for surface-multifidus versus surface-longissimus comparisons was 0.80. Also, the magnitude of the regression coefficients was less variable between different tasks for the longissimus versus surface multifidus comparisons. Accurate measurement of multifidus muscle activity requires intra-muscular electrodes. Electromyography is the accepted technique to document the level of muscular activation, but its specificity to particular muscles depends on correct electrode placement. For multifidus, intra-muscular electrodes are required.
Article
The influence of different relative intensities on power output was investigated in the present study in order to identify the optimal load that maximizes power output during the hang power clean. Fifteen men (age: 22.1 +/- 2.0 years, height: 180.1 +/- 6.3 cm, and body mass: 89.4 +/- 14.7 kg) performed the hang power cleans on a forceplate at 30-90% of one repetition maximum (1RM). Peak power was maximized at 70% 1RM, which was, however, not significantly different from peak power at 50, 60, 80, and 90% 1RM. Average power also was maximized at 70% 1RM, which was not significantly different from average power at 40, 50, 60, 80, and 90% 1RM. It was concluded that (a) the relative intensity had a significant influence on power output, and (b) power output can be maximized at a submaximal load during the hang power clean.