Content uploaded by Renzhen Xiao
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Renzhen Xiao on Dec 28, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Effect of non-uniform slow wave structure in a relativistic backward wave oscillator
with a resonant reflector
Changhua Chen, Renzhen Xiao, Jun Sun, Zhimin Song, Shaofei Huo, Xianchen Bai, Yanchao Shi, and Guozhi
Liu
Citation: Physics of Plasmas (1994-present) 20, 113113 (2013); doi: 10.1063/1.4835335
View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4835335
View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/pop/20/11?ver=pdfcov
Published by the AIP Publishing
Articles you may be interested in
A high efficient relativistic backward wave oscillator with coaxial nonuniform slow-wave structure and depth-
tunable extractor
Phys. Plasmas 20, 023105 (2013); 10.1063/1.4776711
Experimental study of a compact P-band coaxial relativistic backward wave oscillator with three periods slow
wave structure
Phys. Plasmas 19, 083113 (2012); 10.1063/1.4748564
A compact P-band coaxial relativistic backward wave oscillator with only three periods slow wave structure
Phys. Plasmas 18, 103111 (2011); 10.1063/1.3646519
Asymmetric-mode competition in a relativistic backward wave oscillator with a coaxial slow-wave structure
Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 241501 (2010); 10.1063/1.3526726
Dispersive characteristics and longitudinal resonance properties in a relativistic backward wave oscillator with
the coaxial arbitrary-profile slow-wave structure
Phys. Plasmas 16, 113104 (2009); 10.1063/1.3254375
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
166.111.120.18 On: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:12:36
Effect of non-uniform slow wave structure in a relativistic backward wave
oscillator with a resonant reflector
Changhua Chen, Renzhen Xiao, Jun Sun, Zhimin Song, Shaofei Huo, Xianchen Bai,
Yanchao Shi, and Guozhi Liu
Science and Technology on High Power Microwave Laboratory, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology,
Xi’an 710024, China
(Received 8 October 2013; accepted 13 November 2013; published online 26 November 2013)
This paper provides a fresh insight into the effect of non-uniform slow wave structure (SWS) used in
a relativistic backward wave oscillator (RBWO) with a resonant reflector. Compared with the
uniform SWS, the reflection coefficient of the non-uniform SWS is higher, leading to a lower
modulating electric field in the resonant reflector and a larger distance to maximize the modulation
current. Moreover, for both types of RBWOs, stronger standing-wave field takes place at the rear part
of the SWS. In addition, besides Cerenkov effects, the energy conversion process in the RBWO
strongly depends on transit time effects. Thus, the matching condition between the distributions of
harmonic current and standing wave field provides a profound influence on the beam-wave
interaction. In the non-uniform RBWO, the region with a stronger standing wave field corresponds to
a higher fundamental harmonic current distribution. Particle-in-cell simulations show that with a
diode voltage of 1.02 MV and beam current of 13.2 kA, a microwave power of 4 GW has been
obtained, compared to that of 3 GW in the uniform RBWO. V
C2013 AIP Publishing LLC.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4835335]
I. INTRODUCTION
The relativistic backward wave oscillator (RBWO) is
one of the most promising high power microwave generators
and has been investigated intensively because of its virtues
such as high power, high efficiency, and high repetition
rate.
1–27
To increase the beam-wave interaction efficiency,
improved structures, such as non-uniform slow wave struc-
ture (SWS),
5–12
sectional SWS,
13,14
coaxial SWS,
11,15–17
and
the introduction of resonant reflector,
9,18–27
modulation
cavity,
23–26
and extraction cavity,
23–27
are adopted. In partic-
ular, the non-uniform SWS has been proven to be effective
to increase the efficiency about several decades ago and is
still widely used now.
5–12
The physics of the non-uniform SWS is generally inter-
preted from the point of view of the coupling impedance and
phase velocity.
5–11
The coupling impedance between the
slow space charge wave on the electron beam and the surface
harmonic of the backward electromagnetic mode can be
modified by varying the ripple amplitude, or by varying the
magnetic field distribution within the tube. The phase veloc-
ity of this harmonic can be varied by gradually changing the
period of the ripples. The variations in the coupling imped-
ance or phase velocity affect the interaction between the
electron beam and electromagnetic modes along the length
of the tube and increase the beam-to-wave efficiency. As an
exception, Moreland et al. suggests that prebunching the
electron beam in the initial section of the RBWO with two-
stage non-uniform amplitude SWS results in increased
microwave generation efficiency.
12
The RBWO with a resonant reflector is characterized by
efficient electron beam premodulation in the reflector region.
Theoretical and experimental studies have demonstrated the
feasibility of increasing the microwave power and energy,
mechanically tuning the oscillation frequency, and enhanc-
ing the efficiency in this kind of RBWO.
9,18–21
This paper
will provide a fresh insight into the mechanism of increased
efficiency using a non-uniform SWS in the RBWO with a
resonant reflector. The goal of this study is to explore the
physics of the non-uniform RBWO with a resonant reflector,
which may reveal methods of further improving the effi-
ciency of microwave generation in a RBWO.
II. MODULATION OF BEAM CURRENT BY THE
STRONG FIELD IN THE RESONANT REFLECTOR
The velocity of an electron beam will be modulated after
it propagates past the resonant reflector of a RBWO. With
the assumption that the beam electrons are guided by an
infinitely strong axial magnetic field, the relativistic electron
equation of motion is given by
dcm0v
ðÞ
dt ¼eE0sin xt
ðÞ
;(1)
where eand m0are the electron charge and rest mass, E0and
xare the amplitude and angular frequency of the modulating
field, respectively, vis the electron velocity, and
c¼1=ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1v2=c2
p,cis the light speed in vacuum.
Since the axial electric field in the resonant reflector is
very strong, the classical velocity perturation method is not
appropriate for this case. Thus, we introduce the momentum
perturation method. Assuming the electron enters the reso-
nant reflector at time t0and velocity v0, then it can be
derived from Eq. (1)
cb c0b01eE0dM1
c0m0c2b2
0
sin xt0þhd
2
"#
;(2)
1070-664X/2013/20(11)/113113/5/$30.00 V
C2013 AIP Publishing LLC20, 113113-1
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS 20, 113113 (2013)
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
166.111.120.18 On: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:12:36
where b0¼v0=c,hd¼xd=v0is the dc transit angle, dis the
reflector width, and M1¼sin hd
2
=hd
2is the coupling
coefficient.
Next, we will calculate the rf current after the resonant
reflector. For simplicity and a qualitative analysis, the modu-
lating electric field and the space charge field in the drift
space and the SWS are not taken into account. Thus, the
electron phase can be expressed as
h¼xt0þxz
v:(3)
Then the fundamental harmonic current amplitude is given by
I1z
ðÞ¼I0
pð2p
0
eihdh0;(4)
where I0is the dc current and h0¼xt0is uniformly distrib-
uted from 0 to 2p.
As an example, for E0¼750 kV=cm;d¼1cm;and f¼
9:7GHz;the distribution of fundamental harmonic current
amplitude after the electron beam with energy of 920 keV
and current of 13.2 kA propagates past the resonant reflector
is plotted in Fig. 1. The harmonic current reaches its maxi-
mum at the distance of about 8.4 cm from the center of the
resonant reflector. For comparison, the harmonic current dis-
tributions for two other modulating fields, E0¼700 kV=cm
and E0¼800 kV=cm;are also shown in Fig. 1.Itisobvious
that a larger modulating field leads to the appearance of the
peak current at a smaller distance. Consequently, for fixed
beam energy, the peak location of modulation current can be
changed by modifying the amplitude of modulating field to
match the distribution of axial electric field in the SWS. In
Sec. III, we will demonstrate that the introduction of a non-
uniform SWS decreases the modulating field in the resonant
reflector.
III. EFFECT OF NON-UNIFORM SWS ON REFLECTION
COEFFICIENT AND FIELD DISTRIBUTION
The uniform SWS consists of seven homogeneous peri-
ods, and the non-uniform SWS comprises three periods with
increasing amplitude and four homogeneous periods, as
shown in Fig. 2. The reflection coefficients for two types of
SWSs are illustrated in Fig. 3. Apparently, compared with
the uniform SWS, less power is transmitted from the right
port to the left port for the non-uniform SWS at the fre-
quency of 9.7 GHz. Therefore, the electric field in the reso-
nant reflector of the non-uniform RBWO is smaller, as
indicated in Fig. 4. In addition, the axial electric field distri-
butions in most parts of the two SWSs, especially in the
homogenous regions (19.4–25 cm), are similar.
FIG. 1. Fundamental harmonic current distribution after an electron beam
propagates past a resonant reflector for different modulating fields.
FIG. 2. Calculation model for the uniform SWS (a) and non-uniform SWS
(b). A TM
01
mode is injected from the right port.
FIG. 3. Reflection coefficients for the uniform SWS and non-uniform SWS.
FIG. 4. Axial electric field distributions for the uniform RBWO and non-
uniform RBWO when the electron beam is absent.
113113-2 Chen et al. Phys. Plasmas 20, 113113 (2013)
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
166.111.120.18 On: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:12:36
IV. EFFECT OF NON-UNIFORM SWS ON
FUNDAMENTAL HARMONIC CURRENT DISTRIBUTION
AND MICROWAVE GENERATION
Particle-in-cell (PIC) code UNIPIC
28
is used to simulate
the two types of RBWOs, as shown in Fig. 5. In Fig. 5(a),
the SWS is uniform, and it is non-uniform in Fig. 5(b).In
addition, the lengths of drift sections between the resonant
reflector and the SWS are slightly varied to adjust the fre-
quencies of the two RBWOs to the same. The pictures of
both RBWOs operation derived from simulations indicate
that the microwave owes its origin to random oscillation, and
then the dominant frequency component determined by the
electron beam parameters and the SWS begins to increase.
With the elevation of modulating field in the resonant reflec-
tor, the harmonic current rises, and its peak position shifts
from the collector end to the cathode end until the micro-
wave achieves saturation. Figure 6displays the fundamental
harmonic current distributions after saturation. The values of
peaks for two harmonic currents are almost the same, but the
locations differ substantially. For the uniform RBWO, the
peak locates at about 17.4 cm, far away from the positions
where the larger axial electric field appear (Fig. 4). Whereas
for the non-uniform RBWO, the peaks locate at 17.7 cm and
18.9 cm (the distances from the center of the resonant
reflector are 6.8 cm and 8.0 cm, close to the results obtained
in Sec. II), much nearer to the maximum axial electric field.
Moreover, at the point where the maximum electric field
occurs (22.2 cm), the harmonic current is much larger in the
non-uniform RBWO (8.9 kA) than that in the uniform
RBWO (7.3 kA).
It should be noted that in the two RBWOs, the operation
mode is TM
01
mode, near ppoint, as shown in Fig. 7. The
beam interaction with the SWS produces a TM
01
mode that
consists of backward traveling surface and volume harmon-
ics with almost the same amplitude. The backward volume
harmonic is reflected by the resonant reflector producing a
forward traveling volume harmonic and forming standing
waves in the SWS. The observation of the electric field dis-
tributions at different instants obtained from the PIC simula-
tions proves this. Thus, besides Cerenkov effects, the energy
conversion process will strongly depend on transit time
effects. That is to say, the matching condition between the
distributions of the harmonic current and the standing-wave
field will provide a profound influence on the beam-wave
interaction. A typical instantaneous distribution of the beam
current and axial electric field is shown in Fig. 8. Obviously,
the matching between the beam current and axial electric
FIG. 5. Phase space plots for the uniform RBWO (a) and non-uniform RBWO (b).
FIG. 6. Fundamental harmonic current distributions for the uniform RBWO
and non-uniform RBWO.
FIG. 7. Dispersion curves of the uniform SWS. Also shown is the beam line
vb¼0:934ccorresponding to a beam energy of 920 keV, k0¼2p=z0;z0is
the length of the SWS period.
113113-3 Chen et al. Phys. Plasmas 20, 113113 (2013)
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
166.111.120.18 On: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:12:36
field in the non-uniform RBWO is more beneficial to the
energy exchange.
Figure 9shows the output microwave powers for the
uniform RBWO and non-uniform RBWO. With a diode volt-
age of 1.02 MV and beam current of 13.2 kA, the generated
microwaves are 3.0 and 4.0 GW, giving the beam-to-micro-
wave conversion efficiencies of 22% and 30%, respectively,
and the microwave frequencies are both 9.7 GHz. The
shorter starting time in the uniform RBWO can be attributed
to the larger modulating field in the resonant reflector.
V. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the radiation enhancement in the non-
uniform RBWO can be elucidated with the better matching
between the distributions of the fundamental harmonic cur-
rent and the axial electric field. Compared with the uniform
SWS, the reflection coefficient of the non-uniform SWS is
higher, leading to a lower modulating electric field in the res-
onant reflector and a larger distance to maximize the modu-
lation current. Moreover, for both types of RBWOs, stronger
standing-wave field takes place at the rear part of the SWS,
and the energy conversion process strongly depends on
transit time effects. In the non-uniform RBWO, the region
with a stronger standing wave field corresponds to a higher
fundamental harmonic current distribution. Therefore, when
the diode voltage is 1.02 MV and beam current is 13.2 kA, a
microwave with power of 4 GW has been obtained, com-
pared to that of 3 GW in the uniform RBWO.
VI. FUTURE WORK
Generally speaking, the stronger field in the RBWO
with a resonant reflector appears at the rear part of the tube,
so it is favorable to comparatively decrease the axial electric
field in the reflector to shift the peak of the harmonic current
to the collector end. For this purpose, some higher-order
mode reflector, such as TM
021
(Ref. 24)orTM
022
reflector,
29
where the average modulating field is weaker than that in the
conventional TM
020
reflector, may be used. Adding an
extraction structure either between the reflector and the SWS
or at the end of the SWS is potential to decrease the modulat-
ing field in the reflector. Moreover, the amplitude and phase
of axial electric field distribution can also be modified to
meet the requirement of effective beam-wave interaction by
the introduction of a middle cavity between the SWS and an
extraction cavity at the end of the SWS.
23–27
Existing and
ongoing work suggests that further increasing the power con-
version efficiency to exceed 50% by combining the advan-
tages of aforementioned methods is possible.
1
J. A. Swegle, J. W. Poukey, and G. T. Leifeste, Phys. Fluids 28, 2882
(1985).
2
C. H. Chen, G. Z. Liu, W. H. Huang, Z. M. Song, J. P. Fan, and H. J.
Wang, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 30, 1108 (2002).
3
S. D. Korovin, I. K. Kurkan, S. V. Loginov, I. V. Pegel, S. D. Polevin, S.
N. Volkov, and A. A. Zherlitsyn, Laser Part. Beams 21, 175 (2003).
4
V. L. Bratman, G. G. Denisov, N. G. Kolganov, S. V. Mishakin, S. V.
Samsonov, A. W. Cross, W. He, L. Zhang, M. McStravick, C. G. Whyte,
A. R. Young, K. Ronald, C. W. Robertson, and A. D. R. Phelps, Phys.
Plasmas 17, 110703 (2010).
5
V. S. Ivanov, S. I. Krementsov, V. A. Kutsenko, M. D. Raizer, A. A.
Rukhadze, and A. V. Fedotov, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 26, 580 (1981).
6
S. D. Korovin, S. D. Polevin, A. M. Roitman, and V. V. Rostov, Sov.
Tech. Phys. Lett. 18, 265 (1992).
7
B. Levush, T. M. Antonsen, Jr., A. N. Vlasov, G. S. Nusinovich, S. M.
Miller, Y. Carmel, V. L. Granatstein, W. W. Destler, A. Bromborsky, C.
Schlesiger, D. K. Abe, and L. Ludeking, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 24, 843
(1996).
8
G. J. Wen, F. Z. Xie, J. Y. Li, and S. G. Liu, Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves
21, 2107 (2000).
FIG. 8. Instantaneous distributions of axial electric field and beam current for the uniform RBWO (a) and non-uniform RBWO (b).
FIG. 9. Time evolution of the output powers for the uniform RBWO and
non-uniform RBWO.
113113-4 Chen et al. Phys. Plasmas 20, 113113 (2013)
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
166.111.120.18 On: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:12:36
9
A. I. Klimov, I. K. Kurkan, S. D. Polevin, V. V. Rostov, and E. M.
Totmeninov, Tech. Phys. Lett. 34, 235 (2008).
10
Y. Wu, Z. Xu, Z. H. Li, Q. S. Ma, and C. X. Tang, Chin. Phys. C 36, 750
(2012).
11
X. J. Ge, H. H. Zhong, J. Zhang, and B. L. Qian, Phys. Plasmas 20,
023105 (2013).
12
L. D. Moreland, E. Schamiloglu, R. W. Lemke, S. D. Korovin, V. V.
Rostov, A. M. Roitman, K. J. Hendricks, and T. A. Spencer, IEEE Trans.
Plasma Sci. 22, 554 (1994).
13
S. P. Bugaev, V. A. Cherepenin, V. I. Kanavets, A. I. Klimov, A. D.
Kopenkin, V. I. Koshelev, V. A. Popov, and A. I. Slepkov, IEEE Trans.
Plasma Sci. 18, 525 (1990).
14
J. Zhang, Z. X. Jin, J. H. Yang, H. H. Zhong, T. Shu, J. D. Zhang, B. L.
Qian, C. W. Yuan, Z. Q. Li, Y. W. Fan, S. Y. Zhou, and L. R. Xu, IEEE
Trans. Plasma Sci. 39, 1438 (2011).
15
G. Z. Liu, R. Z. Xiao, C. H. Chen, H. Shao, Y. M. Hu, and H. J. Wang,
J. Appl. Phys. 103, 093303 (2008).
16
Y. Teng, R. Z. Xiao, Z. M. Song, J. Sun, C. H. Chen, H. Shao, G. Z. Liu,
and C. X. Tang, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 024701 (2011).
17
L. Gao, B. L. Qian, X. J. Ge, X. P. Zhang, and Z. X. Jin, Phys. Plasmas 19,
083113 (2012).
18
V. Gunin, A. I. Klimov, S. D. Korovin, I. K. Kurkan, I. V. Pegel, S. D.
Polevin, A. M. Roitman, V. V. Rostov, A. S. Stepchenko, and E. M.
Totmeninov, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 26, 326 (1998).
19
V. V. Rostov, E. M. Totmeninov, and M. I. Yalandin, Tech. Phys. 53,
1471 (2008).
20
G. Z. Liu, C. H. Chen, J. Sun, X. W. Zhang, R. Z. Xiao, H. Shao, Z. M.
Song, J. P. Fan, H. J. Wang, and Y. M. Hu, in Proceedings of the 35th
IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science, 1P31, Karlsruhe,
Germany, 2008.
21
Z. H. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 054102 (2008).
22
Q. S. Ma, Z. H. Li, C. Z. Lu, Y. Wu, B. Q. Ju, A. M. Yu, C. Su, and X. Jin,
IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39, 1201 (2011).
23
R. Z. Xiao, C. H. Chen, X. W. Zhang, and J. Sun, J. Appl. Phys. 105,
053306 (2009).
24
R. Z. Xiao, X. W. Zhang, L. J. Zhang, X. Z. Li, L. G. Zhang, W. Song, Y.
M. Hu, J. Sun, S. F. Huo, C. H. Chen, Q. Y. Zhang, and G. Z. Liu, Laser
Part. Beams 28, 505 (2010).
25
R. Z. Xiao, C. H. Chen, J. Sun, X. W. Zhang, and L. J. Zhang, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 98, 101502 (2011).
26
R. Z. Xiao, C. H. Chen, and X. W. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 133504
(2013).
27
W. Song, C. H. Chen, J. Sun, X. W. Zhang, H. Shao, Z. M. Song, S. F.
Huo, Y. C. Shi, and X. Z. Li. Phys. Plasmas 19, 103111 (2012).
28
J. G. Wang, D. H. Zhang, C. L. Liu, Y. D. Li, Y. Wang, H. G. Wang, H. L.
Qiao, and X. Z. Li, Phys. Plasmas 16, 033108 (2009).
29
W. Song, J. Sun, Z. M. Song, C. H. Chen, H. Shao, and Y. C. Zhang, AIP
Adv. 2, 012118 (2012).
113113-5 Chen et al. Phys. Plasmas 20, 113113 (2013)
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
166.111.120.18 On: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:12:36