Sampling may promote prolonged engagement in sport by limiting physical injuries (Fraser-Thomas et al., 2005). Overtraining injuries are a concern for young athletes who specialize in one sport and engage in high volumes of deliberate practice (Hollander, Meyers, & Leunes, 1995; Law, Côté, & Ericsson, 2007). For instance, young gymnasts who practice for over 16 hours a week have been shown to have higher incidences of back injuries (Goldstein, Berger, Windier, & Jackson, 1991). A sampling approach in child-controlled play (e.g. deliberate play) rather than highly adult-controlled practice (e.g. deliberate practice) has been proposed as a strategy to limit overuse and other sport-related injuries (Micheli, Glassman, & Klein, 2000). In summary, sampling may protect against sport attrition by limiting sport related injuries and allowing children to have early experiences in sport that are enjoyable. Psychosocial Benefits of Sampling Only a small percentage of children who participate in school sports ever become elite athletes. Therefore, the psychosocial outcomes of sport participation are particularly important to consider. Recent studies with youth between the ages of 11 to 17 have found that those who are involved in a variety of extracurricular activities (e.g. sports, volunteer, arts) score more favourably on outcome measures such as Grade Point Average (GPA; Fredricks & Eccles, 2006a) and positive peer relationships (Fredricks & Eccles, 2006b) than youth who participate in fewer activities. These patterns are thought to exist due to each extracurricular activity bringing its own distinct pattern of socialization experiences that reinforce certain behaviours and/or teach various skills (Fredricks & Eccles, 2006b; Rose-Krasnor, Bussen, Willoughby, & Chambers, 2006). This contention is corroborated by studies of children and youths' experiences in extracurricular activities indicating that youth have unique experiences in each activity that contribute to their development (Hansen, Larson, & Dworkin, 2003; Larson, Hansen, & Moneta, 2006). This has led Wilkes and Côté (2007) to propose that children who sample different activities (through their own choice or by virtue of parental direction), have a greater chance of developing the following five developmental outcomes compared to children who specialize in one activity: 1) life skills, 2) prosocial behaviour, 3) healthy identity, 4) diverse peer groups and 5) social capital. Il arrive souvent que Ia première exposition des enfants à un contexte sportif structuré passe par les cours d'éducation physique ou les activités parascolaires organisés à l'école. En ce sens, les enseignants et entraîneurs jouent un rôle de premier plan dans le développement des habileté sportives des élèves. Des recherche ont fait ressortir deux méthodes utiles pour aider les jeunes athlètes à se développer, soit la spécialisation précoce (Ericsson, Krampe et Tesch-Römer, 1993) et l'échantillonnage (Côté, [Baker] et [Abernethy] 2007). Même si L· modèle développemental de participation sportive (Côté et coll., 2007) décrit en quoi les deux approches favorisent l'expertise sportive, celle par échantillonnage offre plus d'avantages sur le plan sportif et plus de bienfaits psychosociaux. Cet article explique en quoi l'echantiUonniigr de dijjrrriits sports piir les jeunes les aide à perfectionner des habiletés physiques liées à cinq caractéristiques psychosociales : l'autonomie fonctionnelles, la sociabilité, la saine identité, la diversification des groupes de pairs et le capital social Les auteurs discutent égaiement de stratégies qui encouragent ce genre d'environnement.