Content uploaded by Zafar Alam Mahmood
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Zafar Alam Mahmood on Apr 01, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
This article was downloaded by: [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD]
On: 01 March 2014, At: 22:34
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered
office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal
Plants
Publication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/whsm20
Biological Activities Assessment of
Centella asiatica (Linn.)
Rafi Akhtar Sultan a , Saad Bin Zafar Mahmood b , Iqbal Azhar a ,
Syed Waseemuddin Ahmed a & Zafar Alam Mahmood c
a Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy , University of
Karachi , Karachi , Pakistan
b Ziauddin Medical College , Ziauddin University , Karachi , Pakistan
c Colorcon Limited, Flagship House , Dartford , England
Published online: 25 Feb 2014.
To cite this article: Rafi Akhtar Sultan , Saad Bin Zafar Mahmood , Iqbal Azhar , Syed Waseemuddin
Ahmed & Zafar Alam Mahmood (2014) Biological Activities Assessment of Centella asiatica (Linn.),
Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants, 20:3, 319-327, DOI: 10.1080/10496475.2013.869521
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10496475.2013.869521
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or
howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising
out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants, 20:319–327, 2014
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 1049-6475 print/1540-3580 online
DOI: 10.1080/10496475.2013.869521
Biological Activities Assessment
of Centella asiatica (Linn.)
RAFI AKHTAR SULTAN,1SAAD BIN ZAFAR MAHMOOD,2
IQBAL AZHAR,1SYED WASEEMUDDIN AHMED,1
and ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD3
1Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy,
University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
2Ziauddin Medical College, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
3Colorcon Limited, Flagship House, Dartford, England
Biological activities of Centella asiatica were determined as
cytotoxic activity–LD50 =1926 µg.mL−1using Artemia salina;
mild insecticidal activity (40% mortality) against Rhyzopertha
dominica; no activity against Tribolium castaneum and
Callosobruchus analis; phytotoxicity (70% growth regulation
at 1,000 µg.mL−1and 10% growth regulation at 10 µg.mL−1)
against Lemna minor. Mild antibacterial and antifungal activities
were noted against Bacillus subtilis,Pseudomonas aerug-
inosa,andCandida albicans, while no activity was noted
against Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli. Antioxidant per-
formance was comparable to ascorbic acid, and analgesic
and anti-inflammatory activities comparable with aspirin at
100 mg.kg−1b.w.
KEYWORDS phytochemicals, phytopharmaceuticals, disc diffu-
sion assay, antimicrobial susceptibility, bioassays
INTRODUCTION
Centella asiatica (Apiaceae) is grown in swampy areas of Pakistan (4). The
Ayurvedic system of medicine reports use of C. asiatica for cough, bronchitis,
Received April 16, 2013.
Address correspondence to Zafar Alam Mahmood, Colorcon Limited, Flagship House,
Victory Way, Crossways, Dartford, Kent DA2 6 QD, England. E-mail: zmahmood@
colorcon.com
319
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014
320 R. A. Sultan et al.
asthma, wound healing, and also considered as anti-aging herb that fortifies
the human immune system (33); useful for brain tonic, sedative, enhanced
memory, treatment of leprosy, ulceration, chronic rheumatism, malaria, fever,
epilepsy and in the enlargement of glands (22). It is also consumed by the
people in India, China, Thailand, and Malaysia as vegetable and used in
drinks, such as tea or juice (12,19).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Material and Preparation of Extract
The plant was collected from district Rawalpindi (Tehsil/Sub-district,
Kahutta), Pakistan. The identified sample specimen (G. H. No. 86232) was
placed at the Herbarium of University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan for future
reference. The collected aerial parts were dried under shade and soaked in
ethanol for 15 days, filtered, concentrated in rotary evaporator, dried, and
powdered in a lyophilizer and stored at 4◦C in airtight amber glass bottles
for further studies.
Assessment of Biological Activities
Standard or earlier reported methods were used to determine biological
activities. These include cytotoxicity (24), insecticidal (1), phytotoxicity (34),
analgesic and anti-inflammatory (20), antioxidant (25), and antimicrobial
activities (30).
RESULTS
Cytotoxic Activity
In the cytotoxic activity performed using Artemia salina at 10, 100, or 1,000
µg.mL–−1, the death rate was calculated as 3.33%, 20.00%, and 40.00%,
respectively, against the concentration of test sample. The LD50 calcu-
lated as 1926 µg.mL−1. Etoposide was used as standard drug during this
study.
Insecticidal Activity
Of the three insects tested, no activity (mortality) was observed against
Tribolium castaneum and Callosobruchus analis, while minor activity (40%
mortality) was observed against Rhyzopertha dominica.
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014
Assessment of Centella asiatica (Linn.) 321
Phytotoxicity
Phytotoxic activity tested against Lemna minor using sample at 10, 100,
and 1,000 µg.mL−1demonstrated 10%, 20%, and 70% growth retardation,
respectively, compared to control.
Antimicrobial Activity
The antimicrobial activity was conducted against three local isolates of each
bacterial species and a standard ATCC culture (Table 1). The standard cul-
tures included Bacillus subtilis (ATCC-6633), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-
6538), E. coli (ATCC-14169), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC-27853), and
C. albicans (ATCC-10231). The activity was carried out using 100, 200, 300,
or 400 µg/disc, respectively. Commercial antibiotic discs cefotaxime (CFX)
and ceftriaxone (CTX) were employed as positive control for antibacterial
screening and miconazole nitrate against C. albicans for antifungal screen-
ing. Results indicated that with the exception of Staphylococcus aureus and
E.coli, others were mildly sensitive against C. asiatica at 200, 300, and 400
µg and resistant at 100 µg. Thus a low degree of antimicrobial effect/zone of
inhibition (4 mm against Bcillius subtilis, 6 mm against Pseudomonas aerug-
inosa and 5 mm against Candida albicans on average basis) were observed
compared with the standard drugs. No effect against Staphylococcus aureus
and E.coli was noted. As positive control Cefotaxime showed 10 mm zones
of inhibition against Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus while 30 mm
zone of inhibition against E. coli. Ceftriaxone showed 20 mm zone of inhibi-
tion against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Miconazole nitrate, which was used
as a standard antifungal drug, indicated a 20-mm zone of inhibition against
Candida albicans.
Analgesic and Anti-inflammatory Activity
Analgesic activity of C. asiatica was investigated using three methods (hot
plate, analgesy meter, and writhing) to compare and observe the difference
in activity if any (Tables 2–4), and anti-inflammatory activity was determined
by paw edema method (Table 5). Both analgesic and anti-inflammatory activ-
ities were determined at a dose of 100 mg.kg−1body weight, and aspirin
was used as standard reference drug to compare the activity. The results
of analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities were comparable with aspirin.
The highest analgesic effect was observed after 2 h of dosing and declined
after 3 h, and the highest anti-inflammatory activity was noted at the end
of 5 h.
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014
322 R. A. Sultan et al.
TABLE 1 In vitro Antibacterial Activity of the Ethanol Extract of Centella asiatica Aerial Parts
Diameter of Zone Inhibition (mm)
Disc Concentration (µg)
Standard Antibiotic
Disc
Name of microorganisms 400 300 200 100 (CFXa/CTXa/MNb)
Antibacterial screening
B. subtilis BS1 443R 10mm
BS2 543R 10mm
BS3 553R 10mm
ATCC-6633 5 4 3 R 10 mm
S. aureus SA1 RRRR 10mm
SA2 RRRR 10mm
SA3 RRRR 10mm
ATCC-6538 R R R R 10 mm
E. coli EC1 RRRR 30mm
EC2 RRRR 30mm
EC3 RRRR 30mm
ATCC-14169 R R R R 30 mm
P. aeruginosa PA1 775R 20mm
PA2 763R 20mm
PA3 764R 20mm
ATCC-27853 8 7 4 R 20 mm
Antifungal screening
C. albicans CA1 663R 20mm
CA2 664R 20mm
CA3 765R 20mm
ATCC-10231 7 6 4 R 20 mm
aCFX (cefotaxime) 30 µg/disc, CTX (ceftriaxone) 30 µg/disc.
bMN (miconazole nitrate) 40 µg/disc.
TABLE 2 Analgesic Activity of the Ethanol Extract of Centella asiatica (Hot Plate Method)
Reaction time after treatment (% Analgesia)
Sample
Dose
(mg.kg−1)
Initial
Reaction time 30 min 1 h 2 h 3 h
Control — 57.6 ±4.7 59.4 ±2.9 56.2 ±1.8 57.8 ±1.4 62.2 ±3.2
Aspirin 100 57.4 ±2.5 67.0 ±2.6 95.8 ±2.4 149.2 ±4.4 64.6 ±1.6
(16.7%) (66.9%) (159.9%) (12.5%)
Test sample 100 57.2 ±4.3 66.6 ±4.9 94.8 ±3.9 148.0 ±3.18 64.2 ±2.5
(16.4%) (65.7%) (158.7%) (12.2%)
Data are mean ±SE; n=5.
Antioxidant Activity
Antioxidant activity of the sample at 100, 200, 300, or 400 µg.mL−1deter-
mined by nitric oxide radical scavenging assay using ascorbic acid as
standard showed that the antioxidant activity was comparable to ascorbic
acid at all concentrations.
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014
Assessment of Centella asiatica (Linn.) 323
TABLE 3 Analgesic Activity of the Ethanol Extract of Centella asiatica (Analgesy Meter)
After treatment (% Analgesia)
Sample
Oral Dose
(mg.kg−1)
Before
Treatment 30 min 1 h 2 h 3 h
Control — 58.5 ±4.5 59.43 ±4.2 59.49 ±6.1 63.91 ±5.1 58.94 ±3.0
Aspirin 100 55.2 ±3.9 65.7 ±3.7 84.8 ±3.4 94.2 ±4.0 83.3 ±3.39
(19.0%) (53.6%) (70.7%) (50.9%)
Test sample 100 57.6 ±2.4 69.4 ±3.3 89.5 ±3.0 99.1 ±4.5 88.2 ±3.8
(20.5%) (55.4%) (72.0%) (48.3%)
Data are mean ±SE; n=6.
TABLE 4 Analgesic Activity of the Ethanol Extract of Centella asiatica (Writhing Test)
Group Dose (mg.kg−1) Writhes % Pain inhibition
Control — 70 ±2.4 —
Aspirin 100 4.8 ±0.4 93.1
Test sample 100 5.2 ±0.4 92.6
Data are mean ±SE; n=5.
TABLE 5 Anti-inflammatory Activity of Centella asiatica Extract
Increase of paw volume in ml
(Mean ±SE) % inhibition
Treatment
Dose
(mg.kg−1) After 1 hour
After
3 hours
After
5 hours
After
1 hour
After
3 hours
After
5 hours
Control — 1.08 ±.0.03 1.29 ±0.02 1.72 ±0.06 — — —
Aspirin 100 0.94 ±0.05 0.87 ±0.04 0.43 ±0.10 12.96 32.56 75.00
Test sample 100 0.96 ±0.03 0.88 ±0.07 0.46 ±0.10 11.11 31.78 73.26
DISCUSSION
Earlier reports on cytotoxic activity of C. asiatica (whole plant) using 100,
500, or 1,000 µg.mL−1indicated LD50 more than 1,000 µg.mL−1at the end of
24 h, and it was concluded that C. asiatica possessed insignificant cytotoxic
activity (23). In two separate studies (24,29), the lethal concentration (LD50)
was reported as 500 µg.mL−1and 793.33 ±1.81 ppm for C. asiatica using
hydro-alcohol and aqueous extract of whole plant, respectively, while in
another study, considerable cytotoxic activity of C. asiatica was also reported
by the authors (3). Apparently the studies highlight LD50 for C. asiatica rang-
ing from 0.3229 to above 1000 µg.mL−1whereas in the present study, the
LD50 recorded as 1,926 µg.mL−1against standard drug (etoposide) show-
ing 7.4625 µg.mL−1. The upper limit of toxic concentration was calculated as
60,822 µg.mL−1while lower toxic concentration as 606 µg.mL−1in this study,
which may be due to lower cytotoxicity of C. asiatica available in Pakistan.
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014
324 R. A. Sultan et al.
Results of the present study were not comparable with earlier reports in other
regions (3,23,24,29). The cytotoxic and antitumor effects involve a direct
action on DNA synthesis with no toxic effect against lymphocytes (2) and
relates to availability and concentration of asiaticoside (14) and asiatic acid
(31); therefore, it may be assumed that C. asiatica available in Pakistan may
have low concentration of asiatocoside and asiatic acid.
Herbs in the form of extract and powder have a long history of utiliza-
tion as repellents and insecticides, such as product developed from neem,
grapefruit seeds, and garlic (13), used as alternatives in pest management.
The initial preliminary screening results relating to insecticidal activity of C.
asiatica was reported in 1943 (26) as powdered drug having “fair toxicity”
against Mexican bean beetle larvae; however, no effect against silkworm
larvae or bean aphids, followed by contradictory results of toxic effect of
C. asiatica on bean aphids (7), toxicity to American cockroaches and non-
toxic to German cockroaches (13), as cited in reviews (9,32). In the present
study, there was no activity against T. castaneum and C. analis and only
minor activity against R. dominica, which were not comparable with earlier
reports reporting insecticidal activity of C. asiatica aqueous extract against
bean aphid, Aphis fabae, and Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis (16).
C. asiatica in high concentration inhibited germination and growth of
plants while in low concentrations there was promotion of germination (5).
Antimicrobial activity was reported in C. asiatica fractions in methanol (28),
ethanol, petroleum ether, and water (17). Aqueous-ethanol extracts were
the strongest in terms of antimicrobial activity (21). Some authors linked
antimicrobial activity due to asiaticoside and reported antibacterial activity
against Pseudomonas pyocyaneus and Trichoderma mentagrophytes but not
against Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Candida albicans,andAspergillus
niger (37). Authors using ethanol extract only antiprotozoal activity against
Entamoeba histolytica and no antimicrobial or antifungal activity (6,10).
Other research investigators reported C. asiatica as anti-diarrheal drug on the
basis of its effectiveness against 12 enteric pathogens (27). A study that used
a herbal mixture containing C. asiatica reported antinociceptive activity (18).
The standard reference drug, aspirin, behaved very similarly in the tests
in this study, suggesting a possible role of C. asiatica in the management of
pain and inflammation.
Earlier reported studies suggested terpene acids (as madecassic acid
and asiatic acid) mainly responsible for analgesic (antinocieptive) and
anti-inflammatory activity of C. asiatica, extending its application in the man-
agement of inflammatory conditions or rheumatism (15,36). Some authors
reported the aqueous extract of whole plant showing anti-nociceptive activ-
ity in mice when tested against acetic acid-induced writhing and hot-plate
methods. The extract was less potent than morphine but was similar to
aspirin in analgesic activity (36). Results of the present study also support
that the C. asiatica possessed considerable analgesic activity. Degree of
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014
Assessment of Centella asiatica (Linn.) 325
anti-inflammatory activity of C. asiatica was compared to ibuprofen (11),
mefenamic acid (36), and was dose-dependent (8). Recent study also sug-
gests that methanol extract of C. asiatica have similar level of antioxidant
activity as compared to ascorbic acid, and our results support the same (35).
The biological activities of C. asiatica reported are diverse and need more
standardized approached to understand the mechanisms of activities.
REFERENCES
1. Azhar, I., F. Mazhar, M. Mohtasheem, and M S. Ali. 2009. Some biological
evaluations on Samanea saman. Pak. J. Pharm 26:47–53.
2. Babu, T. D., and J. Paddikkala. 1995. The role of Centella asiatica extracts on
chemotherapeutic drug-induced toxicity in mice. Amala Res. Bull. 15:41–45.
3. Balasuriya, B. M. G. K., and H. R. W. Dharmaratne. 2007. Cytotoxicity and
antioxidant activity studies of green leafy vegetables consumed in Sri Lanka.
J. Natn. Sci. Found. Sri Lanka 35:255–258.
4. Baquar, S. R. 1989. Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Pakistan,1
st ed. Printas,
Karachi – Pakistan. 98–99.
5. Boiteau, P., and A. R. Ratsimamanga. 1958. Effects of asiaticoside on germination
and growth of plants. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. 152:1106–1107.
6. Brinkhaus, B., M. Lindner, D. Schuppan, and E. G. Hahn. 2000. Chemical, phar-
macological and clinical profile of the East Asian medical plant Centella asiatica.
Phytomedicine 7:427–448.
7. Chin, S. F., A. Lin, and C. Y. Hu. 1944. Toxicity Studies of Insecticidal Plant in
Southwestern China. Report from College of Agricultural . National Sun Yat-Sen
University. Canton, China. 56 pp.
8. Chippada, S. C., S. S. Volluri, S. R. Bammidi, and M. Vangalapati. 2011. In vitro
anti inflammatory activity of methanolic extract of Centella asiatica by HRBC
membrane stabilization. Rasayan J. Chem. 4:457–460.
9. Craker, L. E., and J. E. Simon. 1996. Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants—Recent
Advances in Botany, Horticulture, and Pharmacology. Routledge, London p. 3,
145–147.
10. Dhar, M. L., M. M. Dhar, B. N. Dhawan, B. N. Mehrotra, and C. Ray. 1968.
Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part I. Indian J. Exp. Biol.
6(4):232–247.
11. George, M., L. Joseph, and Ramaswamy. 2009. Anti-allergic, anti-pruritic,
and anti-inflammatory activities of Centella asiatica extracts. Afr. J. Tradit.
Complement. Altern. Med. 6:554–559.
12. Hashim, P., H. Sidek, M. H. M. Helan, A. Sabery, U. D. Palanisamy, and M. Ilham.
2011. Triterpene composition and bioactivities of Centella asiatica. Molecules
16:1310–1322.
13. Heal, R. E., E. F. Rogers, R. T. Wallace, and O. Starnes. 1950. A survey of plants
for insecticidal activity. Lloydia 13:89–162.
14. Huang, Y. H., S. H. Zhang, R. X. Zhen, X. D. Xu, and Y. S. Zhen. 2004.
Asiaticoside inducing apoptosis of tumor cells and enhancing anti-tumor activity
of vincristine. Ai Zheng. 23:1599–1604.
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014
326 R. A. Sultan et al.
15. Inamdar, P. K., R. D. Yeole, A. B. Ghogare, and N. J. De Souza. 1996.
Determination of biologically active constituents in Centella asiatica. J
Chromatography 742:127–130.
16. Jacobson, M. 1958. Insecticides from Plants, A Review of the Literature
1954–1971,USDA. Agriculture Handbook No.154. United States Department
of Agriculture, Washington DC.
17. Jagtap, N. S., S. S. Khadabadi, D. S. Ghorpade, N. B. Banarase, and S. S.
Naphade. 2009. Antimicrobial and antifungal activity of Centella asiatica (L.)
Urban, Umbeliferae. Research J. Pharm. Tech. 2:328–330.
18. Jaikumar, S., S. Viswanathan, B. R. Asokan, S. Sengottuvelu, and S. Ramaswamy.
2010. Anti-nociceptive activity of a polyherbal formulation RO7D, in experimen-
tal models: Possible mechanisms. RJPBCS 1:719–726.
19. James, J. T., and I. A. Dubery. 2009. Pentacyclic triterpenoids from the medicinal
herb, Centella asiatica (L.) Urban. Molecules 14:3922–3941.
20. Kamanyi, A., M. Mbiantcha, T. B. Nguelefack, G. Ateufack, P. Watcho, B. L.
Ndontsa, and P. Tane. 2009. Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of
extracts from the stem bark of Croton macrostachyus (Euphorbiaceae) in mice
and rats. J. Compl. Integr. Med. 6(1):1–17.
21. K˛edzia, B., T. Bobkiewicz-Kozłowska, M. Furmanowa, P. Mikołajczak, E.
Hołderna-K˛edzia, I. Okulicz-Kozaryn, J. Wójcik, et al. 2007. Studies on the
biological properties of extracts from Centella asiatica (L.) urban herb. Herba
Polonica 53:34–44.
22. Khare, C. P. 2007. Indian Medicinal Plants, An Illustrated Dictionary. Springer
Scientific +Business Media LLC. pp. 136–137.
23. Kim, W. J., J. Kim, B. Veriansyah, J. D. Kim, Y. W. Lee, S. G. Oh, and R.
Tjandrawinata. 2009. Extraction of bioactive components from Centella asiatica
using subcritical water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 48:211–216.
24. Krishnaraju, A. V., T. V. N. Rao, D. Sundararaju, M. Vanisree, H. S. Tsay, and G.
V. Subbaraju. 2005. Assessment of bioactivity of Indian medicinal plants using
brine shrimp (Artemia salina) lethality assay. Int. J. appl. Sci. Eng. 3:125–134.
25. Kumar, S., D. Kumar, K. Manjusha Saroha, N. Singh, and B. Vashishta. 2008.
Antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential of Citrullus colocynthis (L.)
Schrad. methanolic fruit extract. Acta Pharm. 58:215–220.
26. Lee, C. S., and R. Hansberry. 1943. Toxicity studies on some chinese plants. J.
Econ. Ent. 36(6):915–921
27. Mamtha, B., K. Kavitha, K. K. Srinivasan, and P. G. Shivananda. 2004. An in vitro
study of the effect of Centella asiatica (Indian pennywort) on enteric pathogens.
Indian J. Pharmacol. 36:41–44.
28. Obayed Ullah, M., S. Sultana, A. Haque, and S. Tasmin. 2009. Antimicrobial,
cytotoxic and antioxidant activity of Centella asiatica. Eur. J. Sci. Res.
30:260–264.
29. Padmaja, R., P. C. Arun, D. Prashanth, M. Deepak, A. Amit, and M. Anjana. 2002.
Brine shrimp lethality bioassay of selected Indian medicinal plants. Fitoterapia
73:508–510.
30. Parekh, J., and S. V. Chanda. 2007. In vitro antimicrobial activity and phyto-
chemical analysis of some Indian medicinal plants. Turk. J. Biol. 31:53–58.
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014
Assessment of Centella asiatica (Linn.) 327
31. Park, B. C., K. O. Bosire, E. S. Lee, Y. S. Lee, and J. A. Kim. 2005. Asiatic acid
induces apoptosis in SK-MEL-2 human melanoma cells. Cancer Lett. 218:81–90.
32. Prakash, A., and J. Rao. 1997. Botanical Pesticides in Agriculture. Lewis
Publishers. 122 pp. Please provide (city/state/country) location for Lewis
Publishers
33. Premila, M. S. 2006. Ayurvedic Herbs: A Clinical Guide to the Healing Plants of
Traditional Indian Medicine. Routledge, London. 148, 316–317.
34. Rashid, R., F. Mukhtar, and N. M. Niaz. 2009. Biological screening of Salvia
cabulica. Pak. J. Bot. 41:1453–1462.
35. Singh, D., M. Mishra, M. Gupta, P. Singh, A. Gupta, and R. Nema. 2012. Nitric
oxide radical scavenging assay of bioactive compounds present in methanol
extract of Centella asiatica. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2:42–44.
36. Somchit, M. N., M. R. Sulaiman, A. Zuraini, L. Samsuddin, N. Somchit, D. A. Israf,
and S. Moin. 2004. Antinociceptive and antiinflammatory effects of Centella
asiatica. Indian J. Pharm. 36:377–380.
37. Tschesche, W., and G. Wulff. 1965. Über die antimikrobielle Wirksamkeit von
Saponinen. Z Naturforsch 20b:543–546.
Downloaded by [ZAFAR ALAM MAHMOOD] at 22:34 01 March 2014