ArticlePDF Available

Sleep Disturbances: Implications for Cannabis Use, Cannabis Use Cessation, and Cannabis Use Treatment



Cannabis may be used, among certain individuals, for its actual and/or perceived sleep-promoting properties. While evidence suggests that cannabis is likely beneficial for sleep initiation, over time individuals may develop tolerance to these benefits, leading to greater use in order to maintain the same sleep-inducing effects. This form of use likely contributes to the development of problematic cannabis use patterns, including cannabis use disorders. Evidence also points to sleep as an important consideration in terms of understanding cannabis withdrawal and relapse. Here, sleep disturbances have been reported as a primary symptom of withdrawal; with studies revealing that this increase in sleep disruption during cannabis discontinuation may be a significant risk factor for relapse. Therefore, interventions aimed at providing alternative means to cope with and/or treat sleep disturbances (e.g., behavioral or pharmacological approaches) are likely important to consider as adjuncts to interventions for cannabis use disorders to improve treatment outcomes.
Sleep Disturbances: Implications for Cannabis Use, Cannabis Use
Cessation, and Cannabis Use Treatment
Kimberly A. Babson &Marcel O. Bonn-Miller
Published online: 18 March 2014
Abstract Cannabis may be used, among certain individuals,
for its actual and/or perceived sleep-promoting properties.
Although evidence suggests that cannabis is likely beneficial
for sleep initiation, over time individuals may develop toler-
ance to these benefits, leading to greater use in order to
maintain the same sleep-inducing effects. This form of use
likely contributes to the development of problematic cannabis
use patterns, including cannabis use disorders. Evidence also
points to sleep as an important consideration in terms of
understanding cannabis withdrawal and relapse. Here, sleep
disturbances have been reported as a primary symptom of
withdrawal, with studies revealing that this increase in sleep
disruption during discontinuation of cannabis use may be a
significant risk factor for relapse. Therefore, it is likely impor-
tant to consider interventions aimed at providing alternative
means to cope with and/or treat sleep disturbances (e.g.,
behavioral or pharmacological approaches) as adjuncts to
interventions for cannabis use disorders to improve treatment
Keywords Cannabis .Sleep .Cannabis withdrawal .
Cannabistreatment .Cannabis use disorders .Insomnia .Sleep
Approximately 97 million Americans over the age of 12 years
(31 % of the overall population) have tried cannabis, with 4.3
million Americans (1.3 % of the population) meeting the
criteria for problematic cannabis use (defined as hazardous
use, abuse, or dependence) in 2009 [1]. On the basis of this
prevalence pattern, it has been estimated that the need for
cannabis use disorder (CUD) treatment will more than double
by 2020 [2]. Contingency management, motivational en-
hancement, and cognitive behavioral interventions are cur-
rently the most efficacious evidence-based interventions of-
fered for treatment of CUDs [3]. Despite the presence of such
effective interventions, and patientsdesire to quit, cannabis
use cessation attempts are often met with high rates of lapse
and relapse [46], indicating significant room for improve-
ment in the treatment of problematic cannabis use.
Previous research has shown that 63 % of adults engaged in
cannabis use treatment (i.e., cognitive behavioral intervention
and motivation enhancement) relapse (defined as a return to
the previous level of use or abandonment of the abstinence
goal) to regular use within 4 months, with the rates of relapse
increasing to over 70 % by 16 months [7]. In addition to full
relapses, recent work has demonstrated that lapses (defined as
a slip or violation of the abstinence goal) are also common.
Moore and Budney [5] demonstrated that among outpatient
K. A. Babson
Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care
System, 795 Willow Road (152-MPD), Menlo Park, CA 94025,
K. A. Babson (*)
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School
of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305-5717, USA
M. O. Bonn-Miller
Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education,
Philadelphia VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue,
Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
M. O. Bonn-Miller
National Center for PTSD & Center for Innovation to
Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow
Road (152-MPD), Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
M. O. Bonn-Miller
Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University
of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Curr Addict Rep (2014) 1:109114
DOI 10.1007/s40429-014-0016-9
#Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA) 2014
adults engaged in treatment for a CUD, 24 % lapsed by
1 month, 46 % within 3 months, and 71 % within 6 months.
For this reason, it is important to identify malleable mecha-
nisms implicated in poor cannabis use cessation outcomes to
improve and generally refine existing treatments for CUD.
Sleep disturbance is one factor which has shown recent theo-
retical and empirical promise in terms of understanding can-
nabis use and predicting cannabis use cessation outcomes. By
understanding the role of sleep in regard to cannabis use, one
may optimize interventions for individuals with CUD.
The purpose of this review is to highlight the existing
literature pertaining to the comorbidity between cannabis use
and sleep disturbances, including implications for future em-
pirical work and treatments. We begin by discussing the
neurobiological underpinnings of the association between
sleep and cannabis, followed by a discussion of clinical work
aimed at understanding how disturbed sleep may lead to
cannabis use. Next, we discuss mechanisms by which canna-
bis use may lead to increased difficulties with sleep, including
how sleep may affect cannabis use cessation outcomes.
Neurobiology of Sleep and Cannabis Comorbidity
Preclinical and clinical research demonstrates that cannabis
alters the sleepwake cycle [8]. Cannabis comprises a multi-
tude of chemical compounds, with the primary psychoactive
constituent being Δ
-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ
-THC), which
has neural implications that are mediated through cannabinoid
(i.e., CB1) receptors located in the brain [9]. One of the
primary neural effects of Δ
-THC is sedation [10]. There are
two primary mechanisms proposed to explain this impact.
First, endogenous cannabinoids have been shown to increase
the level of adenosine, a sleep-promoting agent [11]. Second,
neurons in the lateral hypothalamus involved in regulation of
arousal systems express CB1 receptors, resulting in inhibition
of the arousal system [11]. Some studies have shown that
immediate administration of Δ
-THC reduces sleep latency
[12]. However, in studies using high-dose Δ
-THC, or among
cannabis-naïve participants, Δ
-THC tends to have an activat-
ing responsethat has been associatedwith increased latency to
sleep onset [1315]. These contrasting findings could also be
explained by work that has shown that Δ
-THC may have a
biphasic influence whereby stimulating effects are first expe-
rienced, followed by sedating effects [16].
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a nonpsychoactive component of
cannabis that can counter the excitatory effects, and potentiate
the sedative effects, of Δ
-THC [8]. CBD administered imme-
diately has been shown to perform as a short-acting hypnotic
in rats [8]. Specifically, CBD administration has been shown
to have sleep-inducing (with a 20 mg/kg dose) and sleep-
maintenance (with a 40 mg/kg dose) qualities in rats, with
tolerance to these effects developing after long-term
administration [8]. However, among humans, administration
of CBD (i.e., 15 mg) has been shown to have an alerting
affect, which can counter the sedating qualities of Δ
[17]. Despite the disparate findings regarding the individual
effects of Δ
-THC and CBD, when combined, Δ
-THC and
CBD appear to have an antagonistic effect on each other in
terms of the sleepwake cycle [8,18]. Together, the dose and
the timing of administration appear to be important factors to
consider when evaluating the impact of Δ
-THC and CBD.
Both cannabis and sleep disturbances have also been asso-
ciated with reduction of activity in the same regions of the
prefrontal cortex [1922]. The prefrontal cortex has been
shown to play a primary role in normal sleep, and reductions
in activity in the prefrontal cortex have been observed among
individuals with insomnia [21] or sleep deprivation [22], and
among heavy cannabis users abstinent for 30 days [19]. The
orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been a region of particular
interest, as both discontinuation of cannabis use and insomnia
are associated with decreased OFC glucose metabolism [21,
23], and Δ
-THC administration has been associated with
increases in OFC glucose metabolism, which may function
to decrease insomnia [24]. Taken together, these cortical dis-
ruptions offer a potential model from which to understand the
association between sleep disturbance and cannabis use.
Poor Sleep Can Contribute to Coping-Oriented Cannabis
Understanding the reasons or motives for substance use is also
helpful for grasping the nature of substance use behavior.
Recent work has demonstrated that individuals, particularly
those with psychological vulnerabilities, for example, post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), other anxiety disorders, and
depression, may use cannabis for coping-related reasons
[2528]. Those reporting coping as a primary motive for
cannabis use have been shown to be at higher risk of elevated
frequency and amount of use, as well as the development of a
CUD [2932]. Following from this line of work, there has
been a developing focus on understanding specific states or
symptoms for which individuals use cannabis to cope.
Sleep disturbances have emerged as a set of symptoms for
which individuals appear particularly apt to use cannabis for
coping reasons [33••]. Research has suggested that adminis-
tration of an oromucosal cannabis-based medicine extract
(2.7 mg Δ
-THC, 2.5 mg CBD) improves short-term sleep
problems among individuals with insomnia and chronic pain
[34]. This initial empirical work is further supported by neu-
robiological research demonstrating that the psychoactive
components of cannabis, such as Δ
-THC, may facilitate the
onset of sleep [34,35]. However, over time, individuals may
habituate or develop tolerance to the sleep-inducing and self-
reported sleep-enhancing qualities of cannabis, thereby
110 Curr Addict Rep (2014) 1:109114
requiring more in order to obtain the same desired result [36].
Indeed, the beneficial effect of cannabis on self-reported sleep
quality is less frequently noted among long-term cannabis
users [36].
Clinical research has also provided evidence for the use of
cannabis as a means to cope with sleep disturbances among
adults and adolescents. For example, among adolescent canna-
bis users without a use disorder (aged 1622 years), 69.6 %
reported using it to sleep [37]. Lower rates have been observed
among regular long-term cannabis users (i.e., those using can-
nabis for at least 10 years), of which 50 % reported using
cannabis to improve sleep [38]. Among medical cannabis
patients, Bonn-Miller el al. [39] demonstrated that 48.1 % use
cannabis to aid with insomnia, whereas slightly higher rates
have been observed among medical cannabis patients receiving
cannabis for physical health reasons [40]. Indeed, of those
receiving medical cannabis for treatment of pain, 8385 %
reported improved sleep, with higher rates of sleep benefit
observed among those with mood disorders (93 %) [40].
The use of cannabis for sleep promotion has also been
observed among nonmedical users with psychological disor-
ders, with 69.4 % of individuals with psychosis reporting
cannabis use to improve sleep [41]. Among a sample of
individuals with PTSD, Bonn-Miller et al. [42]demonstrated
that, compared with women with PTSD who self-reported
relatively good sleep, women with elevated symptoms of both
PTSD and disturbed sleep were more likely to report using
cannabis as a means to cope. A follow-up study among
medical cannabis patients demonstrated that those with ele-
vated symptoms of PTSD used medical cannabis for the
purposes of improving sleep, and that this pattern was associ-
ated with a heightened frequency of cannabis use [33••].
Taken together, research on coping motives among indi-
viduals with and without psychological vulnerabilities sug-
gests that cannabis may initially serve to promote sleep initi-
ation among individuals with sleep difficulties. However, the
continued use of cannabis for these reasons may actually lead
to long-term deficits in sleep architecture and severer cannabis
use patterns. What follows from this work is a cyclical model
whereby cannabis is used to cope with initial sleep difficulties
that may or may not be associated with a psychological
disorder (e.g., PTSD). As cannabis is used to cope with sleep
difficulties, individuals may find that they begin using more
cannabis than initially intended, with tolerance developing
over time. Such heightened cannabis use then likely leads to
greater disturbances in sleep during periods of abstinence,
which can then prompt a return to cannabis use.
Sleep Disturbance as a Cannabis Withdrawal Symptom
A breadth of laboratory-based studies have identified sleep
disturbance as a salient symptom of cannabis withdrawal
[4346]. Controlled studies have shown that sleep distur-
bances increase during periods of abstinence and remit during
periods of cannabis use [43]. An outpatient study of cannabis
use cessation demonstrated that sleep disturbance was elevat-
ed over the course of a 45-day abstinence period [44], and
studies of inpatient non-treatment-seeking regular users have
demonstrated that withdrawal from cannabis increases both
self-reported and objectively measured (i.e.,
polysomnography) sleep disturbances. Resumption of canna-
bis use [43], and oral administration of both low (30 mg/day)
and high (90 mg/day) doses of Δ
-THC have been shown to
alleviate these sleep problems [4648].
In contrast, one study demonstrated no effect of orally
administered Δ
-THC on objective measures of sleep within
the context of cannabis withdrawal [49], whereas in a second
study, Haney et al. [50]demonstratedthatorallyadministered
-THC (60 mg/day) increased sleep onset latency during
cannabis abstinence. However, in this same study, a combina-
tion of lofexidine and orally administered Δ
-THC resulted in
significant improvements in both self-reported and objectively
measured sleep during cannabis use cessation.
In a more recent study, Vandrey et al. [51••]specifically
examined the effect of addressing poor sleep during cannabis
withdrawal in a within-subject crossover study among 20
daily cannabis users. The participants completed alternating
periods of cannabis use and abstinence in a controlled envi-
ronment. During a single abstinence phase, a sleep medication
(zolpidem) was administered, and a placebo pill was admin-
istered during a second abstinence period. This study demon-
strated that during the placebo abstinence phase, the partici-
pants experienced reductions in sleep efficiency, sleep time,
stage 1 and stage 2 sleep, REM latency, and self-reported
sleep quality. The participants also demonstrated an increase
in sleep onset latency and the amount of time spent in REM
sleep compared with periods of cannabis use. Administration
of zolpidem attenuated all sleep disturbances except increases
in sleep onset latency.
In summary, outpatient and inpatient studies combined
have identified sleep disturbance as a salient cannabis with-
drawal symptom. Administration of cannabis (through either
smoking or oral administration of Δ
-THC), sleep medication
[51••], and a combination of lofexidine and orally adminis-
tered Δ
-THC have all been shown to attenuate withdrawal-
related sleep disturbance.
Sleep Disturbance Increases the Risk of Cannabis
As sleep disturbance has been documented as a cannabis
withdrawal symptom, it is not surprising that poor sleep has
been shown to be one factor that is predictive of lapse/relapse
to cannabis use [44,45,52,53••,54••]. Retrospective studies
Curr Addict Rep (2014) 1:109114 111
first documented these associations. In one study, 67 daily
cannabis users who had made a cannabis use cessation attempt
in the previous 30 days were interviewed by phone regarding
perceptions of withdrawal symptoms. Of this sample, 65 %
indicated that poor sleep was a primary symptom that led to
their relapse [45]. Furthermore, in two studies of non-
treatment-seeking cannabis users, 3247 % reported poor
sleep during a previous time of abstinence, and 4877 %
indicated that they had relapsed to cannabis use or increased
the use of other substances in order to improve sleep quality
The role of sleep on cannabis use lapse/relapse has
also been supported by laboratory-based experimental
work. Haney [52] demonstrated that decreases in sleep
disturbance resulted in decreased risk of lapse/relapse to
cannabis use (as measured by a laboratory analog task).
More recently, sleep disturbance among cannabis-
dependent veterans prior to a cannabis use cessation
attempt was shown to be predictive of increased risk
of lapse within the first 2 days of the cessation attempt
[54••], and heightened cannabis use during the 6 months
following the cessation attempt [53••]. In contrast to
these findings, studies have demonstrated that a number
of medications shown to improve withdrawal-related
sleep disturbances (i.e., lofexidine, mirtazapine,
quetiapine) have not led to reductions in the risk of
lapse/relapse to cannabis use in the laboratory model
developed by Haney et al. [50,57,58].
Clinical Implications
A breadth of research has demonstrated the efficacy of both
pharmacological (e.g., benzodiazepine hypnotics) and behav-
ioral (cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, CBT-I) in-
terventions for the treatment of insomnia and sleep distur-
bances [5961]. Comparisons between pharmacotherapy and
behavioral interventions have demonstrated comparable treat-
ment effects, with pharmacotherapy offering a more immedi-
ate impact on sleep and behavioral interventions linked to
greater long-term and sustained treatment gains [6264].
Studies have demonstrated that the best sleep treatment out-
comes are observed among individuals who are initially treat-
ed with a combination of pharmacotherapy and behavioral
interventions and then continue treatment only with the be-
havioral intervention [64]. Although treatment effectiveness
exists for both forms of intervention, it is important to note
that no study has examined comparative efficacy or effective-
ness of these interventions among individuals with a history of
substance use disorders. This limitation of existing work is
likely due to the fact that pharmacotherapy for insomnia is
typically not recommended for individuals with a history of
substance use disorders owing to the risk of the development
of dependence [61]. For this reason, additional research
among substance use populations is needed.
Although the findings of recent work have converged
to demonstrate that sleep disturbances impact substance
use and quit success, this research is still in its infancy,
particularly in relation to the evaluation of sleep inter-
ventions for substance use outcomes. Although the im-
pact of CBT-I or sleep medications on cannabis use
cessation has yet to be thoroughly evaluated, research
drawing from the treatment of alcohol use disorders
provides some insight. Research has shown that among
individuals recovering from alcohol dependence, behav-
ioral interventions (e.g., CBT-I) improve self-reported
and objective measures of sleep immediately after the inter-
vention [65,66]andat3and6monthsaftertheintervention
[65]. However, there has yet to be any documentation of an
effect of behavioral sleep interventions on alcohol use cessa-
tion outcomes (e.g., abstinence, relapse) [65,66].
Despite the extensive research support for pharmaco-
therapy and behavioral interventions for insomnia, wide-
spread dissemination and integration of these interven-
tions into specialty care treatment centers (e.g., sub-
stance abuse treatment) has been limited. For this rea-
son, additional research is needed to understand the
potential impact of administering a sleep intervention
prior to, or within the context of, CUD treatment.
Although there remains a general dearth of literature on
the associations between sleep disturbance, cannabis
use, and cannabis use cessation, existing work points
to a cyclical relation whereby cannabis use is main-
tained, and likely initiated, by sleep disturbances stem-
ming both from symptoms of existing psychopathologi-
cal disorders and periods of cannabis abstinence.
Therefore, interventions that provide an alternative
method to cope with disturbed sleep may not only
decrease the perceived need to use cannabis to cope
with sleep problems, but may also potentially lessen
the salience of sleep-related cannabis withdrawal, de-
creasing the risk of lapse/relapse. Although studies of
sleep interventions among alcohol users provide some
evidence for the utility of cognitive behavioral therapy
for co-occurring sleep disturbances, clinical trials exam-
ining the impact of such interventions on substance use
outcomes are lacking. Future work would benefit from
the investigation of the impact of behavioral and phar-
macological sleep interventions, either as standalone
interventions or as an adjunct to other interventions,
for individuals with co-occurring sleep disturbance and
cannabis use.
112 Curr Addict Rep (2014) 1:109114
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest Kimberly A. Babson and Marcel O. Bonn-Miller
declare they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent All procedures
followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible
committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and
with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed
consent was obtained from all patients for their inclusion in the study.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been
highlighted as:
•• Of major importance
1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health:
summary of national findings, NSDUH series H-41. Rockville:
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration;
2. Gfroerer J, Epstein J. Marijuana initiates and their impact on future
drug abuse treatment need. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;54:22937.
3. Roffman R, Stephens R. Cannabis dependence: its nature, conse-
quences and treatment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
4. Budney A, Radonovich K, Higgins S, Wong C. Adults seeking
treatment for marijuana dependence: a comparison with cocaine-
dependent treatment seekers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998;6:
5. Moore B, Budney A. Relapse in outpatient treatment for marijuana
dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2003;25:859.
6. Stephens R, Roffman R, Simpson E. Adult marijuana users seeking
treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61:11004.
7. Marijuana Treatment Project Research Group. Brief treatments for
cannabis dependence: findings from a randomized multisite trial. J
Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:45566.
8. Monti J. Hypnoticlike effects of cannabidiol in the rat.
Psychopharmacology. 1977;55:2635.
9. Bolla K, Lesage S, Gamalso C, Neubauer D, Funderburk F, Cadet J,
et al. Sleep disturbance in heavy marijuana users. Sleep. 2008;31:
10. Fusar-Poli P, Crippa J, Bhattacharyya S, Borgwardt S, Allen P,
Martin-Santos R, et al. Distinct effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
and cannabidiol on neural activation during emotional processing.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:95105.
11. Murillo-Rodriguez E, Blanco-Centurion C, Sanchez C, Piomello D,
Shiromani P. Anandamide enhances extracellular levels of adeno-
sine and induces sleep: an in vivo microdialysis study. Sleep.
12. Cousens K, DiMascio A. Delta 9 THC as an hypnotic. An exper-
imental study of three dose levels. Psychopharmacologia. 1973;33:
13. Tassinari C, Ambrosetto G, Peraita-Adrado MR, Gastaut H. The
neuropsychiatric syndrome of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and
cannabis intoxication in naïve subjects: a clinical and polygraphic
study during wakefulness and sleep. In: Braude M, Szara S, editors.
Pharmacology of marijuana. New York: Raven; 1976. p. 35775.
14. Gillin J, Kotin J, Post R. Sleep during one week ofadministration of
delta-9-tetrahydrocanabinol to psychiatric patients. J Sleep Res.
15. Bobon D, Schulz H, Mattke D, Simonova O. Influence of synthetic-
8-tetrahydrocannabinol on all-night sleep EEG in man. In:
Jovanovic U, editor. The nature of sleep. Stuttgart: Fischer; 1973.
16. Weisz D, Gunnell D, Teyler T, Vardaris R. Changes in hippocampal
CA1 population spikes following administration of delat-9-THC.
Brain Res Bull. 1982;8:15562.
17. Nicholson A, Turner C, Stone B, Robson P. Effect of Δ-9-
tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on nocturnal sleep and
early-morning behavior in young adults. J Clin Psychopharmacol.
18. Moreton J, Davis W. Electroencephalographic study of the effects
of tetrahydrocannabinols on sleep in the rat. Neuropharmacology.
19. Bolla K, Brown K, Eldreth D, Tate K, Cadet J. Dose-related
neurocognitive effects of marijuana use. Neurology. 2002;59:
20. Chuah Y, Venlatraman V, Dinges D, Chee M. The neural basis of
interindividual variability in inhibitory efficiency after sleep depri-
vation. J Neurosci. 2006;26:715662.
21. Drummond S, Smith M, Orff H, Chengazi V, Perlis M. Functional
imaging of the sleeping brain: review of findings and implications
for the study of insomnia. Sleep Med Rev. 2004;8:22742.
22. Muzur A, Pace-Schott E, Hobson J. The prefrontal cortex in sleep.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6:47581.
23. Eldreth D, Matochik J, Cadet J, Bolla K. Abnormal brain activity in
prefrontal brain regions in abstinent marijuana users.
Neuroimaging. 2004;23:91420.
24. Volkow N, Gillespie H, Mullani N, Tancredi L, Grant C, Valentine
A, et al. Brain glucose metabolism in chronic marijuana users at
baseline and during marijuana intoxication. Psychiatry Res.
25. Boden MT, Babson KA, Vujanovic AA, Short NA, Bonn-Miller
MO. Posttraumatic stress disorder and cannabis use characteristics
among military veterans with cannabis dependence. Am J Addict.
26. Bonn-Miller MO, Vujanovic AA, Feldner MT, Bernstein A,
Zvolensky MJ. Posttraumatic stress symptom severity predicts
marijuana use coping motives among traumatic event-exposed
marijuana users. J Trauma Stress. 2007;20:57786.
27. Buckner JD, Schmidt NB, Bobadilla L, Taylor J. Social
anxiety and problematic cannabis use: evaluating the moder-
ating role of stress reactivity and perceived coping. Behav
Res Ther. 2006;44:100715.
28. Passie T, Emrich HM, Karst M, Brandt SD, Halpern JH. Mitigation
of post-traumatic stress symptoms by cannabis resin: a review of the
clinical and neurobiological evidence. Drug Test Anal. 2012;4:
29. Cooper M. Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents:
Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychol
Assess. 1994;6:11728.
30. Fox C, Towe S, Stephens R, Walker D, Roffman R. Motives for
cannabis use in high-risk adolescent users. Psychol Addict Behav.
31. Hides L, Lubman D, Cosgrave E, Buckby J, Killackey E, Yung A.
Motives for substance use among young people seeking mental
health treatment. Early Interv Psychiatr. 2008;2:18894.
32. Johnson K, Mullin J, Marshall E, Bonn-Miller M, Zvolensky
M. Exploring the mediational role of coping motives for
marijuana use in terms of the relation between anxiety
sensitivity and marijuana dependence. Am J Addict.
33.•• Bonn-Miller MO, Babson KA, Vandrey R. Using cannabis to help
you sleep: Heightened frequency of medical cannabis use among
those with PTSD. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;136:1625.
Improvement in sleep is the primary motivation for medical cannabis
use among medical cannabis users with elevated symptoms of PTSD.
Curr Addict Rep (2014) 1:109114 113
34. Russo E, Guy G, Robson P. Cannabis, pain, and sleep: lessons from
therapeutic clinical trials of Sativex, a cannabis-based medicine.
Chem Biodivers. 2007;4:172943.
35. Schierenbeck T, Riemann D, Berger M, Homyak M. Effect of illicit
recreational drugs upon sleep: cocaine, ecstasy and marijuana.
Sleep Med Rev. 2008;12:3819.
36. Halikas J, Weller R, Morse C, Hoffmann R. A longitudinal study of
marijuana effects. Int J Addict. 1985;20:70111.
37. Boys A, Marsden J, Strang J. Understanding reasons for drug use
amongst young people: a functional perspective. Health Educ Res.
38. Reilly D, Didcott P, Swift W, Hall W. Long-term cannabis use:
characteristics of users in an Australian rural area. Addiction.
39. Bonn-Miller MO, Boden MT, Bucossi MM, Babson KA. Self-
reported cannabis use characteristics, patterns, and helpfulness
among medical cannabis users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse.
40. Walsh Z, Callaway R, Belle-Isle L, Capler R, Kay R, Lucas P, et al.
Cannabis for therapeutic purposes: patient characteristics, access,
and reasons for use. Int J Drug Pol. 2013;24:5116.
41. Schaub M, Fanghaenel K, Stohler R. Reasons for cannabis use:
Patients with schizophrenia versus matched healthy controls. Aust
N Z J Psychiatr. 2008;42:10605.
42. Bonn-Miller MO, Babson KA, Vujanovic AA, Feldner MT. Sleep
problems and PTSD symptoms interact to predict marijuana use coping
motives: a preliminary investigation. J Dual Diagn. 2010;6:11122.
43. Budney A, Hughes J, Moore B, Novy P. Marijuana abstinence
effects in marijuana smokers maintained in their home environ-
ment. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:91724.
44. Budney A, Moore B, Vandrey R, Hughes J. The time course and
significance of cannabis withdrawal. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003;112:
45. Budney A, Vandrey R, Hughes J, Thostenson J, Bursac Z.
Comparison of cannabis and tobacco withdrawal syndrome. Am J
Psychiatry. 2008;161:196777.
46. Budney A, Vandrey R, Hughes J, Moore B, Bahrenburg B. Oral
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol suppresses cannabis withdrawal
symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;86:229.
47. Haney M, Ward A, Comer S, Foltin R, Fischman M. Abstinence
symptoms following oral THC administration to humans.
Psychopharmacology. 1999;141:38594.
48. Hart C, Ward A, Haney M, Comer S, Foltin R, Fischman M.
Comparison of smoked marijuana and oral Δ
nol in humans. Psychopharmacology. 2002;164:40715.
49. Haney M, Hart C, Vosburg S, Nasser J, Bennett A, Zubaran C, et al.
Marijuana withdrawal in humans: effects of oral THC or
divalproex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:5870.
50. Haney M, Hart C, Vosburg S, Comer S, Reed S, Foltin R. Effects of
THC and lofexidine in a human laboratory model of marijuana
withdrawal and relapse. Psychopharmacology. 2008;197:15768.
51.•• Vandrey R, Smith M, McCann U, Budney A, Curran E. Sleep
disturbance and the effects of extended release zolpidem during
cannabis withdrawal. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;117:3844.
Cannabis use cessation increases sleep disturbances, whereas
intervention to address sleep problems attenuates this finding.
Sleep interventions may be a beneficial addition to CUD treatment.
52. Haney M. Self-administration of cocaine, cannabis, and heroin in
the human laboratory: benefits and pitfalls. Addict Biol. 2009;14:9
53.•• Babson K, Boden M, Bonn-Miller M. The impact of perceived
sleep quality and sleep efficiency/duration on cannabis use during
a self-guided quit attempt. Addict Behav. 2013;38:270713.
Veterans with poor sleep quality prior to a quit attempt have less
of a reduction in cannabis use during a quit attempt compared with
those with relatively better sleep.
54.•• BabsonKA,Boden MT, Harris AHS, Stickle TR, Bonn-Miller MO.
Poor sleep quality as a risk factor for lapse following a cannabis quit
attempt. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013;44:43843. Veterans with poor
sleep prior to a cannabis quit attempt are at greater risk of lapse/
relapse to cannabis use within the first 2 days of the quit attempt.
55. Copersino M, Boyd S, Tashkin D, Huestis M, Heishman S,
Dermans J, et al. Cannabis withdrawal among non treatment-
seeking adult cannabis user. Am J Addict. 2006;15:814.
56. Levin K, Copersino M, Heishman S,Liu F, Kelly D, Boggs D, etal.
Cannabis withdrawal symptoms in non-treatment-seeking adult
cannabis smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;111:1207.
57. Haney M, Hart C, Vosburg S, Comer S, Reed S, Cooper Z, et al.
Effects of baclofen and mirtazapine on a laboratory model of
marijuana withdrawal and relapse. Psychopharmacology.
58. Cooper Z, Foltin R, Hart C, Vosburg S, Comer S, Haney M. A
human laboratory study investigating the effects of quetiapine on
marijuana withdrawal and relapse in daily marijuana smokers.
Addict Biol. 2013;18:9931002.
59. Morgenthaler T, Kraemer M, Alessi C, Friedman L, Boehlecke B,
Brown T, et al. Practice parameters for the psychological and
behavioral treatment of insomnia: an update. An AASM report.
Sleep. 2006;29:14159.
60. Morin C, Culbert J, Schwartz S. Nonpharmacological interventions
for insomnia: a meta-analysis of treatment efficacy. Am J
Psychiatry. 1994;151:117280.
61. Roehrs T, Roth T. Insomnia pharmacotherapy. Neurotherapeutics.
62. Morin C, Colecchi C, Stone J, Sood R, Brink D. Behavioral and
pharmacological therapies for late-life insomnia: a randomized
controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;28:9919.
63. McClusky H, Milby J, Switzer P, William V, Wooten V. Efficacy of
behavioral versus triazolam treatment in persistent sleep-onset in-
somnia. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1216.
64. Morin C, Vallieres A, Guay B, Ivers H, Savard J, Merette C, et al.
Cognitive behavioral therapy, singly and combined with medica-
tion, for persistent insomnia. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA.
65. Currie S, Clark S, Hodgins D, El-Guebaly N. Randomized con-
trolled trial of brief cognitive-behavioural interventions for insom-
nia in recovering alcoholics. Addiction. 2004;99:112132.
66. Arnedt J, Conroy D, Rutt J, Aloia M, Brower K, Armitage R. An
open trial of cognitive-behavioral treatment for insomnia comorbid
with alcohol dependence. Sleep Med. 2007;8:17680.
114 Curr Addict Rep (2014) 1:109114
... Adolescence is a period marked by high rates of sleep disturbance (Kansagra, 2020), and improvement in sleep is a commonly cited reason for cannabis use in this population (Goodhines et al., 2022). Acute withdrawal from cannabis use, however, is also associated with sleep disturbances (Angarita et al., 2016), often leading to resumption of use (Babson and Bonn-Miller, 2014). Less is known, though, about the specific impact of sustained abstinence on sleep changes in adolescence, which could inform interventions aimed at supporting adolescents through abstinence attempts. ...
... Acute cannabis withdrawal is also known to exacerbate sleep disturbances (Angarita et al., 2016;Gates et al., 2016), including trouble falling asleep, waking during the night, distressing dreams, and reductions in sleep time (Gates et al., 2016), which may represent a salient trigger for resumption of use in those attempting abstinence (Babson and Bonn-Miller, 2014). However, most studies investigating the effects of cannabis withdrawal on sleep have used measures that are not sleep-specific (Allsop et al., 2011) or have employed only retrospective (Vandrey et al., 2005) or observational (Milin et al., 2008) assessments of sleep changes. ...
... The MJRUQ is a self-report measure of motives for cannabis use developed for the current study. Item selection was based on common motives for recreational cannabis use often reported in the literature [13,15,18,36], as well as symptoms for which cannabis is often used medicinally [13,39,40]. Participants who reported using cannabis within the six months prior to the BL assessment were asked to indicate from a list of 13 items all the motives for why they choose to use cannabis (i.e., they could choose more than one). ...
Full-text available
The current study will examine the interactive effects of motives for cannabis use (i.e., health or recreational) and risky decision making (DM) on cannabis use trajectories among adolescents. Data from 171 adolescents, aged 14–17 at the initial visit (baseline), were prospectively analyzed across five time points approximately six months apart. Latent growth curve modeling and linear regression analyses were used. We found a significant interactive effect of “recreational motives” and risky DM on the rate of cannabis use over time. Specifically, among those less likely to use cannabis for recreational purposes, riskier DM was associated with a faster increase in the rate of use over time relative to those with lower risky DM. Additionally, a significant main effect showed that those with a greater proclivity to use cannabis for health purposes had higher initial levels of use at baseline and faster increases in the rate of use over time. Regardless of risky DM, using cannabis for health purposes is associated with faster increases in cannabis use escalation. Additionally, risky DM does impact the association between recreational motives for use and cannabis use trajectories. Future work should examine these associations with additional motives for cannabis use that have been previously validated within the literature.
... Similarly, cannabis is widely marketed and colloquially claimed to be a sleep aid (Winiger et al., 2021). While cannabis use may be used for sleep initiation, other studies find that cannabis use is associated with sleep impairment (Babson & Bonn-Miller, 2014). Therefore, the MPT may be one way further to elucidate the relationship between sleep and cannabis use. ...
Full-text available
Given the expanding legal cannabis market in the US, it is important to understand how cannabis use is impacted by various contexts. Therefore, this study examined the influence of cannabis cues and cannabis use context on demand for cannabis in a sample of 79 community adults. The effects of cannabis cues on self-reported craving and demand for cannabis were explored using a 2 x 2 repeated measures ANOVA, with time (baseline 1 vs. baseline 2) and cue condition (cannabis or neutral cues) as factors. Additionally, the impact of cannabis-use context (driving and sleep) on cannabis demand was investigated using a 2 x 2 x 2 repeated measures ANOVA, with context, cue condition, and block order as factors. Results showed that exposure to cannabis cues increased self-reported craving for cannabis but did not significantly affect demand for cannabis. In the driving context, participants exhibited a significant reduction in cannabis demand, characterized by lower intensity, breakpoint, Omax, and Pmax, as well as higher α. However, the sleep context did not exert a significant effect on cannabis demand. These findings suggest that cannabis use behavior is sensitive to contingencies surrounding driving after cannabis use and that public policy may effectively influence cannabis consumption in driving contexts. Furthermore, the study highlights the need for further research to corroborate the results, understand their implications for public health and policy, and gain a deeper understanding of the influence of cannabis cues on demand prior to sleep.
... 38 Conflicting evidence suggests that cannabis cessation after prolonged use can cause or exacerbate insomnia. 39 Chronic pain affects individuals' ability to get restful sleep. Research, primarily with nabiximols (Sativex THC:CBD 1:1 oromucosal spray), has started to examine the potential role of cannabinoids in addressing sleep disturbances in the context of pain. ...
Cannabis use and interest continues to increase among patients with cancer and caregivers. High-quality research remains scant in many areas, causing hesitancy or discomfort among most clinical providers. Although we have limitations on hard outcomes, we can provide some guidance and more proactively engage in conversations with patients and family about cannabis. Several studies support the efficacy of cannabis for various cancer and treatment-related symptoms, such as chemotherapy-induced nausea and cancer pain. Although formulations and dosing guidelines for clinicians do not formally exist at present, attention to tetrahydrocannabinol concentration and understanding of risks with inhalation can reduce risk. Conflicting information exists on the interaction between cannabis and immunotherapy as well as estrogen receptor interactions. Motivational interviewing can help engage in more productive, less stigmatized conversations.
... Chronic THC transiently disrupts sleep in male mice at early abstinence timepoints. Because sleep disturbances are commonly reported by individuals with CUD during abstinence [35,59,60], we obtained electrographic measures of sleep after the 6-day chronic treatment regimen and normalized these to the pretreatment baseline for each subject ( Fig. 2A, B). In male mice, we observed reduced NREM sleep following chronic THC treatment, evidence of acute, spontaneous withdrawal symptoms in early abstinence (Fig. 2C). ...
Full-text available
Withdrawal symptoms are observed upon cessation of cannabis use in humans. Although animal studies have examined withdrawal symptoms following exposure to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), difficulties in obtaining objective measures of spontaneous withdrawal using paradigms that mimic cessation of use in humans have slowed research. The neuromodulator dopamine (DA) is affected by chronic THC treatment and plays a role in many behaviors related to human THC withdrawal symptoms. These symptoms include sleep disturbances that often drive relapse, and emotional behaviors like irritability and anhedonia. We examined THC withdrawal-induced changes in striatal DA release and the extent to which sleep disruption and behavioral maladaptation manifest during abstinence in a mouse model of chronic THC exposure. Using a THC treatment regimen known to produce tolerance, we measured electrically elicited DA release in acute brain slices from different striatal subregions during early and late THC abstinence. Long-term polysomnographic recordings from mice were used to assess vigilance state and sleep architecture before, during, and after THC treatment. We additionally assessed how behaviors that model human withdrawal symptoms are altered by chronic THC treatment in early and late abstinence. We detected altered striatal DA release, sleep disturbances that mimic clinical observations, and behavioral maladaptation in mice following tolerance to THC. Altered striatal DA release, sleep, and affect-related behaviors associated with spontaneous THC abstinence were more consistently observed in male mice. These findings provide a foundation for preclinical study of directly translatable non-precipitated THC withdrawal symptoms and the neural mechanisms that affect them.
... While some participants used cannabis to induce sleep or alleviate stress, long-term use can build tolerance and exacerbate sleep problems and stress. 45,46 University wellbeing teams might provide support for safer alternatives to cannabis for sleep issues. Intervention strategies might also target non-reflective processes that support cannabis use. ...
Full-text available
Objective: Around 40% of US university students use cannabis, 25% of whom present with cannabis use disorder, which endangers health. We investigated the concurrent contribution of reflective processes, which generate action via conscious deliberation, and non-reflective processes, which prompt behavior automatically, to undergraduates' cannabis consumption. Participants: Eighteen UK undergraduates who regularly consume cannabis (11 female, 7 male; mean age 20 y). Methods: Semi-structured interviews explored cannabis motives, routines, cues, and decision points. Thematic analysis identified themes, in each of which reflective and non-reflective dimensions were coded. Results: Four themes were identified: cannabis use for relaxation, social bonding, and symbolic-affective significance, and contexts and triggers. Some influences guided cannabis use reflectively in some settings, and non-reflectively in others. Even when cannabis use was consciously driven, non-reflective processes were deployed to execute subservient acts, such as rolling joints. Conclusions: Findings highlight specific processes and pathways that might be targeted to reduce cannabis-related harm.
Background Veterans often use cannabis for sleep despite limited evidence of its efficacy. Moreover, how sleep disturbances impact cannabis use longitudinally is unclear. We applied a behavioral economic framework to examine whether sleep disturbances and cannabis demand (i.e., relative value) were related risk-factors for future cannabis use and problems. Methods Veterans deployed post-9/11/2001 who reported past 6-month cannabis use at baseline (n=126) completed surveys on their sleep disturbances, demand via the Marijuana Purchase Task (MPT), and cannabis use. Mediation analyses using Hayes’ PROCESS Macro and zero-inflated negative binomial models tested indirect effects of baseline sleep disturbances on 12-month cannabis use frequency, quantity, and problems via 6-month cannabis demand (i.e., intensity, Omax, Pmax, and breakpoint). Results Only Omax (i.e., maximum expenditure for cannabis) was a significant mediator for 12-month cannabis use quantity and problems when examined concurrently with other demand indices after controlling for covariates. Intensity (i.e., purchase at zero cost) was a significant mediator for 12-month cannabis use frequency when examined concurrently with other demand indices in models controlling for lifetime cannabis use, but not past 30-day use at baseline. Conclusion Cannabis demand, specifically intensity and Omax, may help to identify Veterans with sleep disturbances who are at increased risk for escalating their cannabis use. Subsequent research should assess the extent that sleep disturbances impact cannabis demand in the context of withdrawal, which will inform novel prevention and intervention strategies geared toward reducing negative cannabis-related outcomes among Veterans.
Introduction The present study sought to determine the relationship between self-reported cannabis use dosage in grams per day with (1) objective sleep outcomes: sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency SOL and number of night-time awakenings (NWAK) (2) if objective and subjective sleep measures, using the PSQI, differed between cannabis users and non-cannabis users. Methods Our sample included 178 participants, aged 18-35 years. We collected demographic information, cannabis use in dosage per day and frequency of use, depressive symptoms through the CESD, and subjective sleep reports using the PSQI. After the survey assessment, we monitored sleep using the Phillips Actiwatch Spectrum watch for a minimum of 5 nights. Results The amount of cannabis consumed per day was inversely related to SOL and SE, and positively related to NWAK. After controlling for covariates, regression models were statistically significant for predicting SOL (β = -.369, p<.001), SE (β = -.232, p<.05) and NWAK, (β = -.318, p<.001), indicating cannabis dosage per day is the strongest predictor for the sleep parameters. Subjective sleep measures did not differ from cannabis users versus non-cannabis users. Conclusion Recreational cannabis use is beneficial for SOL but may be detrimental to SE as those who reported increased cannabis use also had more NWAK. Cannabis may be useful for sleep onset, results suggest that increased use does not aid in sleep maintenance.
Negative affect regulation models suggest that marijuana may be used to reduce negative affect. Extant research has provided support for these models, indicating that specific motives for marijuana use, particularly coping motives (i.e., using to alleviate negative affects), mediate relations between affective vulnerabilities and marijuana outcomes. However, sleep motives (i.e., using to promote sleep) have been neglected from such models, despite their theoretical relevance. The present study tested two multiple mediation models in a large sample of marijuana-using college students (N = 1,453) to evaluate the indirect effects of coping and sleep motives in paths from depressive and anxiety symptoms to marijuana outcomes (use, consequences, and cannabis use disorder [CUD] symptoms). Both coping and sleep motives mediated the effects of depressive/anxiety symptoms on each marijuana variable. Moreover, significant double mediated effects were found, such that higher affective symptoms were associated with greater motives; which were associated with more marijuana use; which was related to more negative consequences and CUD symptoms. The findings provide support for sleep motives as a relevant pathway between affective vulnerabilities and marijuana outcomes. Additional research is needed to evaluate the potential benefits of interventions targeting specific marijuana motives.
Cannabis dependence is controversial. Does it occur or is it a myth put forth by those who oppose legalization? What are the signs of cannabis dependence? How many people are affected? What are the health and behavioral risks of becoming cannabis-dependent? What counseling approaches have been tested with adults and adolescents, and how effective are they? What are the arguments for legalization, regulation, or prohibition? Looking back and toward the future, what do we know and what do we need to learn? This state-of-the-science review sets out to answer all those questions, beginning with an historical examination and moving into diagnosis, classification, epidemiology, public health, policy, issues relating to regulation and prohibition, and evidence-based interventions.
This study uses a functional perspective to examine the reasons young people cite for using psychoactive substances. The study sample comprised 364 young poly-drug users recruited using snowball-sampling methods. Data on lifetime and recent frequency and intensity of use for alcohol, cannabis, amphetamines, ecstasy, LSD and cocaine are presented. A majority of the participants had used at least one of these six drugs to fulfil 11 of 18 measured substance use functions. The most popular functions for use were using to: relax (96.7%), become intoxicated (96.4%), keep awake at night while socializing (95.9%), enhance an activity (88.5%) and alleviate depressed mood (86.8%). Substance use functions were found to differ by age and gender. Recognition of the functions fulfilled by substance use should help health educators and prevention strategists to make health messages about drugs more relevant and appropriate to general and specific audiences. Targeting substances that are perceived to fulfil similar functions and addressing issues concerning the substitution of one substance for another may also strengthen education and prevention efforts.
The use of cannabis for medical purposes is proliferating in the U.S., and PTSD is an explicitly approved condition for accessing medical cannabis in 5 states. Prior research suggests that people with PTSD often use cannabis to help cope with their condition, and that doing so results in more frequent and problematic cannabis use patterns. Specific coping motivations, such as sleep improvement, among medical cannabis users, have not been examined. The present study evaluated specific coping use motivations, frequency of cannabis and alcohol use, and mental health among a convenience sample of patients (N=170) at a medical cannabis dispensary in California. Those with high PTSD scores were more likely to use cannabis to improve sleep, and for coping reasons more generally, compared with those with low PTSD scores. Cannabis use frequency was greater among those with high PTSD scores who used for sleep promoting purposes compared with those with low PTSD scores or those who did not use for sleep promoting purposes. Consistent with prior research, this study found increased rates of coping-oriented use of cannabis and greater frequency of cannabis use among medical users with high PTSD scores compared with low PTSD scores. In addition, sleep improvement appears to be a primary motivator for coping-oriented use. Additional research is needed to examine the health consequences of this pattern of cannabis use and whether alternative sleep promoting interventions (e.g. CBT-I) could reduce the reliance on cannabis for adequate sleep among those with PTSD.
Objectives: Little research has investigated the demographic and symptom profile of medical cannabis users in states in the USA that have legalized cannabis use. Methods: In the present cross-sectional study, we investigated the demographic profile of 217 adults currently receiving medical cannabis, as well as differences in problematic use and perceived helpfulness in terms of (i) symptoms of psychological disorders and pain, and (ii) motives for use. Results: Findings indicated that medical cannabis users (i) use and perceive cannabis to be beneficial for multiple conditions, some for which cannabis is not specifically prescribed or allowed at the state level; and (ii) report similar rates of disordered use as compared with population estimates among regular users. Furthermore, problematic cannabis use was predicted by several symptoms of psychological disorders (e.g. depression) and a variety of use motives (e.g. coping), while cannabis was reported as particularly helpful among those with several psychological symptoms (e.g. traumatic intrusions), as well as those reporting use for social anxiety reasons. Conclusions: Results are discussed in terms of future directions for research given the current debates regarding legalization of cannabis for medical purposes and, more generally, the lack of empirical data to inform such debates.