ArticlePDF Available

Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The past two years have seen rapid development of massive open online courses (MOOCs) with the rise of a number of MOOC platforms. The scale of enrolment and participation in the earliest mainstream MOOC courses has garnered a good deal of media attention. However, data about how the enrolment and completion figures have changed since the early courses is not consistently released. This paper seeks to draw together the data that has found its way into the public domain in order to explore factors affecting enrolment and completion. The average MOOC course is found to enroll around 43,000 students, 6.5% of whom complete the course. Enrolment numbers are decreasing over time and are positively correlated with course length. Completion rates are consistent across time, university rank, and total enrolment, but negatively correlated with course length. This study provides a more detailed view of trends in enrolment and completion than was available previously, and a more accurate view of how the MOOC field is developing.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of
Massive Open Online Courses
Katy Jordan
The Open University, UK
Abstract
The past two years have seen rapid development of massive open online courses
(MOOCs) with the rise of a number of MOOC platforms. The scale of enrolment and
participation in the earliest mainstream MOOC courses has garnered a good deal of
media attention. However, data about how the enrolment and completion figures have
changed since the early courses is not consistently released. This paper seeks to draw
together the data that has found its way into the public domain in order to explore
factors affecting enrolment and completion. The average MOOC course is found to
enroll around 43,000 students, 6.5% of whom complete the course. Enrolment numbers
are decreasing over time and are positively correlated with course length. Completion
rates are consistent across time, university rank, and total enrolment, but negatively
correlated with course length. This study provides a more detailed view of trends in
enrolment and completion than was available previously, and a more accurate view of
how the MOOC field is developing.
Keywords: MOOCs; higher education; massive open online courses; online education;
distance learning
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
134
Introduction
In the past two years, massive open online courses (MOOCs) have entered the
mainstream via the establishment of several high-profile MOOC platforms (primarily
Coursera, EdX, and Udacity), offering free courses from a range of elite universities and
receiving a great deal of media attention (Daniel, 2012). 2012 has been referred to as
‘the year of the MOOC’ (Pappano, 2012; Siemens, 2012), and some herald this as a
significant event in shaping the future of higher education, envisioning a future where
MOOCs offer full degrees and ‘bricks and mortar’ institutions decline (Thrun, cited in
Leckart, 2012).
There are clearly great potential individual and societal benefits to providing university-
level education free of some of the traditional barriers to participation in elite education,
such as cost and academic background. However, it is not clear the extent to which
MOOCs provide these benefits in practice. MOOCs may favour those who are already
educationally privileged; Daphne Koller of Coursera has stated that the majority of their
students are already educated to at least undergraduate degree level, with 42.8%
holding a bachelors degree, and a further 36.7% and 5.4% holding master’s and
doctoral degrees (Koller & Ng, 2013). A further study of Coursera students enrolled in
courses provided by the University of Pennsylvania indicates a greater dominance of
highly educated students, 83.0% of respondents being graduates and 44.2% being
educated at the postgraduate level (Emanuel, 2012). The author concludes that MOOCs
are failing in their goal to reach disadvantaged students who would not ordinarily have
access to educational opportunities (Emanuel, 2013). In order to succeed in a MOOC
environment, higher digital literacy may be required of students (Yuan & Powell, 2013),
potentially exacerbating pre-existing digital divides. In theory MOOCs remove
geographical location as a boundary to access, although a lack of internet access may
prevent this from being realized in practice (Guzdial, 2013).
Although smallerscale, connectivist MOOCs have existed for several years, the
development of largerscale MOOCs offered by elite institutions has propelled MOOCs
into the mainstream. The earliest and perhaps most highly cited example is the Stanford
AI class, which attracted 160,000 students (20,000 of whom completed the course)
when it ran in autumn 2011 (Rodriguez, 2012). However, while this example is often
used, it is unlikely to be representative of how the field is developing. A survey
undertaken by The Chronicle of Higher Education in February 2013 suggested that the
average MOOC enrolment is 33,000 students, with an average of 7.5% completing the
course (Kolowich, 2013). Detailed studies of particular courses have emphasized that
those who enroll upon courses have a wide variety of motivations for doing so (Breslow
et al., 2013; Koller, Ng, Do, & Chen, 2013); however motivation does not predict
whether a student will complete a course (Breslow et al., 2013). In examining
completion and engagement with courses, studies have focused upon characterizing
types of learners (Kizilcec, Piech, & Schneider, 2013; Koller et al., 2013). Limitations of
these studies are that they focus upon a small number of early MOOCs, and ascribe
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
135
course completion primarily to student choice and motivation. There is a gap in the
research literature here about what could be learnt about characteristics of courses
themselves and their effect upon enrolment and completion, which this study sought to
explore.
Six-figure enrolment statistics have generated a good deal of interest in MOOCs in the
higher education sector, and are frequently conflated with active participation or
completion. However, the earliest courses are the most frequently cited examples and
may not be representative of how the phenomenon is developing, and the extent to
which enrolment numbers are indicative of completion has not been explored
comprehensively. These issues are obscured to an extent by a lack of consistent data
being made open to those outside of the MOOC platforms. For example, the Coursera
data export policy gives individual institutions control over the data that is released
about courses (Coursera, 2012), and in practice the extent of data sharing is highly
variable and ad hoc.
Now, over 18 months on from the advent of the large MOOC platforms, this paper seeks
to synthesise the data that has found its way into the public domain in order to address
some of the very basic questions associated with MOOCs. How massive is ‘massive’ in
this context? Completion rates are reputedly low, but how low? From the available data,
can we learn anything about factors which might affect enrolment numbers and
completion rates?
Methods
The approach taken here drew together a variety of different publicly available sources
of data online to aggregate information about enrolment and completion for as many
MOOCs as possible. Information about enrolment numbers and completion rates were
gathered from publicly available sources on the Internet. Given the media attention
which MOOCs have garnered, and their ‘massive’ nature, there is a good deal of publicly
available information to be found online, including news stories, university reports,
conference presentations, and MOOC student bloggers. Issues of reliability associated
with using this data are addressed below.
The list of completed MOOCs maintained at Class Central1 was used as a starting point
for the inquiry. Completed courses from Coursera, EdX, and Udacity were identified for
inclusion in the study, while other individual MOOCs and platforms were excluded. This
criteria was used because (i) Coursera, EdX, and Udacity are the platforms which have
received the greatest media focus and have fuelled the global interest in MOOCs, (ii) the
platforms account for the vast majority of MOOCs to date, and (iii) the platforms reflect
the higher education sector more broadly, offering courses presented from ‘bricks and
1 http://www.class-central.com/#pastlist
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
136
mortar’ institutions through the platforms. At the time of writing (22nd July 2013), this
list comprised 279 courses (including courses which have run multiple times).
Enrolment and completion figures were selected as the data to be collected for the
courses, as these are the metrics which are most commonly available. Completion in this
sense was defined as the percentages of students who had satisfied the courses’ criteria
in order to gain a certificate. The exact activities required to achieve this vary according
to course. Where possible, data was also recorded about the number of ‘active users’ in
courses. Information about the number of active users was available for 33 courses,
although some did not provide any definition of the term. Those courses who did define
active users characterized them as students who actively engaged with the course
material to some extent (as opposed to those who enrolled but did not use the course at
all). For example, this includes having logged in to a course, attempted a quiz, or viewed
at least one video. Data was also collected about the date a course began, the course
length in weeks, and university ranking (using the Times Higher Education World
Rankings; THE, 2013) in order to explore whether these factors affect enrolment and
completion.
The enrolment and completion data was collected in two ways: via internet searches and
crowdsourcing information from students who participated in courses, by appealing via
social media. Students contributed data which had been shared with them by the course
instructor to the author’s blog (Jordan, 2013). This yielded information about
enrolment numbers for a total of 91 courses (32.6% of total potential sample), and
completion for 42 courses (15.1% of total). For transparency, the sources used for all
data items are included here. Details of courses for which only enrolment data was
available are shown in Table 1; details of courses for which completion data was found
are shown in Table 2.
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
137
Table 1: Data Drawn from Online Sources for Courses for which Enrolment Numbers
Only were Available
Course
Institution
Enrolled
Start date
Length
(weeks)
Platform
Source
Introduction to
Databases
Stanford
University
60000
2011-10-01
9
Coursera
Widom, 2012
Human-Computer
Interaction
Stanford
University
29105
2012-05-28
5
Coursera
Lugton, 2012
Introduction to
Sociology
Princeton
University
40000
2012-06-11
7
Coursera
Lewin, 2012a
Introduction to
Finance
University of
Michigan
125000
2012-07-23
15
Coursera
Masolova,
2013
Algorithms, Part I
Princeton
University
65000
2012-08-12
6
Coursera
Princeton
University,
2012
Introduction to
Sustainability
University of
Illinois at
Urbana-
Champaign
32000
2012-08-27
8
Coursera
Rushakoff,
2012
Securing Digital
Democracy
University of
Michigan
14000
2012-09-03
5
Coursera
University of
Michigan,
2012
Statistics One
Princeton
University
96000
2012-09-03
12
Coursera
Bialik, 2013
Modern &
Contemporary
American Poetry
University of
Pennsylvania
36000
2012-09-10
10
Coursera
Unger, 2013
Introduction to
Mathematical
Thinking
Stanford
University
57592
2012-09-17
10
Coursera
Devlin, 2012
A History of the
World since 1300
Princeton
University
83000
2012-09-17
12
Coursera
Cervini, 2012
Organizational
Analysis
Stanford
University
81000
2012-09-24
10
Coursera
Hawkins,
2013
An Introduction to
Interactive
Programming in
Python
Rice
University
54000
2012-10-15
Coursera
Weinzimmer,
2012
The Modern
World: Global
History since 1760
University of
Virginia
40000
2013-01-14
15
Coursera
Kapsidelis,
2013
Microeconomics
for Managers
University of
California,
Irvine
37000
2013-01-21
10
Coursera
Heussner,
2013
Fundamentals of
Human Nutrition
University of
Florida
45000
2013-01-22
Coursera
Nelson, 2013
Data Analysis
Johns
Hopkins
University
102000
2013-01-22
8
Coursera
Jordan, 2013
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
138
Course
Institution
Enrolled
Start date
Length
(weeks)
Platform
Source
Principles of Public
Health
University of
California,
Irvine
15000
2013-01-28
5
Coursera
Florida Public
Health
Training
Center, 2013
Introduction to
Digital Sound
Design
Emory
University
45000
2013-01-28
4
Coursera
Williams,
2013
Nutrition for
Health Promotion
and Disease
Prevention
University of
California, San
Francisco
50000
2013-01-28
6
Coursera
Ferraro, 2013
Grow to Greatness:
Smart Growth for
Private Businesses,
PartI
University of
Virginia
71000
2013-01-28
5
Coursera
University of
Virginia, 2013
Developing
Innovative Ideas
for New Companies
University of
Maryland,
College Park
85000
2013-01-28
6
Coursera
Welsh &
Dragusin,
2013
The Modern and
the Postmodern
Wesleyan
University
30000
2013-02-04
14
Coursera
Roth, 2013
Clinical Problem
Solving
University of
California, San
Francisco
28000
2013-02-11
6
Coursera
Harder, 2013
Aboriginal
Worldviews and
Education
University of
Toronto
23000
2013-02-25
4
Coursera
Stauffer, 2013
Introduction to
Music Production
Berklee
College of
Music
50000
2013-03-01
6
Coursera
Clark, 2013
Songwriting
Berklee
College of
Music
65590
2013-03-01
6
Coursera
Pattison, 2013
Sustainable
Agricultural Land
Management
University of
Florida
13000
2013-03-04
9
Coursera
Nelson, 2013
How Things Work
1
University of
Virginia
20000
2013-03-04
Coursera
Burnette,
2012
Leading Strategic
Innovation in
Organizations
Vanderbilt
University
33000
2013-03-05
8
Coursera
Furman
University,
2013
Economic issues,
Food & You
University of
Florida
16000
2013-03-18
10
Coursera
Nelson, 2013
Global sustainable
energy: past,
present and future
University of
Florida
18000
2013-03-24
15
Coursera
Nelson, 2013
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
139
Course
Institution
Enrolled
Start date
Length
(weeks)
Platform
Source
Science,
Technology, and
Society in China I:
Basic Concepts
The Hong
Kong
University of
Science and
Technology
17000
2013-04-04
3
Coursera
Sharma, 2013
Introduction to
Improvisation
Berklee
College of
Music
39000
2013-04-29
5
Coursera
Burton, 2013
Grow to Greatness:
Smart Growth for
Private Businesses,
Part II
University of
Virginia
71000
2013-04-29
4
Coursera
University of
Virginia, 2013
TechniCity
Ohio State
University
16000
2013-05-04
4
Coursera
Campbell,
2013
Nutrition, Health,
and Lifestyle:
Issues and Insights
Vanderbilt
University
66000
2013-05-06
6
Coursera
Moran, 2013
History of Rock,
Part One
University of
Rochester
30000
2013-05-13
7
Coursera
Rivard, 2013
First-Year
Composition 2.0
Georgia
Institute of
Technology
17000
2013-05-27
8
Coursera
Head, 2013
Creative
Programming for
Digital Media &
Mobile Apps
University of
London
International
Programmes
70000
2013-06-03
6
Coursera
Gillies, 2013
Growing Old
Around the Globe
University of
Pennsylvania
4500
2013-06-10
6
Coursera
Posey, 2013
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
140
Table 2: Data Drawn from Online Sources in Relation to MOOC Enrolment, Number of
Active Users, and Completion Rates
Course
Institution
Enrolled
Active
Completed
Start date
Length
Platform
Source
Introduction
to Machine
Learning
Stanford
University
13000
2011-10-01
10
Coursera
McKenna,
2012
Introduction
to Artificial
Intelligence
Stanford
University
20000
2011-10-01
10
Udacity
Schmoller,
2012
6.002x -
Circuits and
Electronics
Massachusetts
Institute of
Technology
7157
2012-03-05
14
MITx
Lewin,
2012b
Software
Engineering
for SaaS
University of
California,
Berkeley
3500
2012-05-18
5
Coursera
Meyer, 2012
Listening to
World Music
University of
Pennsylvania
2191
2012-07-23
7
Coursera
Jordan,
2013
Internet
History,
Technology,
and Security
University of
Michigan
4595
2012-07-23
13
Coursera
Severance,
2012
Gamification
University of
Pennsylvania
8280
2012-08-27
6
Coursera
Werbach,
2012
6.002x:
Circuits and
Electronics
Massachusetts
Institute of
Technology
3008
2012-09-05
14
EdX
Chu, 2013
Functional
Programming
Principles in
Scala
École
Polytechnique
Fédérale de
Lausanne
9593
2012-09-18
7
Coursera
Miller &
Odersky,
2012
Social
Network
Analysis
University of
Michigan
1410
2012-09-24
8
Coursera
Jordan,
2012
Bioelectricity:
A Quantitative
Approach
Duke
University
313
2012-09-24
9
Coursera
Belanger &
Thornton,
2013
Greek and
Roman
Mythology
University of
Pennsylvania
2500
2012-09-24
10
Coursera
Jordan,
2013
An
Introduction
to Operations
Management
University of
Pennsylvania
4000
2012-09-24
8
Coursera
Barber,
2013
Mathematical
Biostatistics
Bootcamp
Johns
Hopkins
University
740
2012-09-24
7
Coursera
Anderson,
2012
Computing for
Data Analysis
Johns
Hopkins
University
2012-09-24
4
Coursera
Simply
Statistics,
2012
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
141
Course
Institution
Enrolled
Active
Completed
Start date
Length
Platform
Source
Learn to
Program: The
Fundamentals
University of
Toronto
8243
2012-09-24
7
Coursera
St.
Petersburg
College,
2013
Introduction
to Genetics
and Evolution
Duke
University
1705
2012-10-10
12
Coursera
Duke
Today, 2012
CS50x:
Introduction
to Computer
Science I
Harvard
University
1388
2012-10-15
24
EdX
Malan, 2013
3.091x:
Introduction
to Solid State
Chemistry
Massachusetts
Institute of
Technology
2082
2012-10-15
12
EdX
Chu, 2013
Computational
Investing, Part
I
Georgia
Institute of
Technology
2554
2012-10-22
9
Coursera
Balch,
2013a
Think Again:
How to
Reason and
Argue
Duke
University
5322
2012-11-26
12
Coursera
Riddle,
2013a
Introduction
to Astronomy
Duke
University
2141
2012-11-27
8
Coursera
Belanger,
2013
Drugs and the
Brain
California
Institute of
Technology
4400
2012-12-01
5
Coursera
Lesiewicz,
2013
Calculus:
Single
Variable
University of
Pennsylvania
2013-01-07
13
Coursera
Unger, 2013
Calculus One
Ohio State
University
2013-01-07
15
Coursera
Evans, 2013
Image and
video
processing:
From Mars to
Hollywood
with a stop at
the hospital
Duke
University
4069
2013-01-14
9
Coursera
Riddle,
2013b
Artificial
Intelligence
Planning
University of
Edinburgh
654
2013-01-28
5
Coursera
University
of
Edinburgh,
2013
E-learning and
Digital
Cultures
University of
Edinburgh
1719
2013-01-28
5
Coursera
University
of
Edinburgh,
2013
Critical
Thinking in
Global
Challenges
University of
Edinburgh
6909
2013-01-28
5
Coursera
University
of
Edinburgh,
2013
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
142
Course
Institution
Enrolled
Active
Completed
Start date
Length
Platform
Source
Introduction
to Philosophy
University of
Edinburgh
9445
2013-01-28
7
Coursera
University
of
Edinburgh,
2013
Astrobiology
and the Search
for
Extraterrestria
l Life
University of
Edinburgh
7707
2013-01-28
5
Coursera
University
of
Edinburgh,
2013
Equine
Nutrition
University of
Edinburgh
8416
2013-01-28
5
Coursera
University
of
Edinburgh,
2013
Introductory
Organic
Chemistry -
Part 1
University of
Illinois at
Urbana-
Champaign
2013-01-28
8
Coursera
Arnaud,
2013
Stat2.1x:
Introduction
to Statistics:
Descriptive
Statistics
University of
California,
Berkeley
8181
2013-02-20
5
EdX
Adhikari,
2013
Computational
Investing, Part
I
Georgia
Institute of
Technology
1165
2013-02-23
8
Coursera
Balch,
2013b
AIDS
Emory
University
2013-02-25
9
Coursera
Williams,
2013
Introductory
Human
Physiology
Duke
University
1036
2013-02-25
12
Coursera
Zhou, 2013
Pattern-
Oriented
Software
Architectures
for Concurrent
and
Networked
Software
Vanderbilt
University
1643
2013-03-04
8
Coursera
Jordan,
2013
Introduction
to
Mathematical
Thinking
Stanford
University
1950
2013-03-04
10
Coursera
Schmoller,
2013
A Beginner's
Guide to
Irrational
Behavior
Duke
University
3892
2013-03-25
8
Coursera
Jordan,
2013
Gamification
University of
Pennsylvania
5592
2013-04-01
6
Coursera
Werbach,
2013
Medical
Neuroscience
Duke
University
756
2013-04-08
12
Coursera
Novicki,
2013
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
143
Course
Institution
Enrolled
Active
Completed
Start date
Length
Platform
Source
Healthcare
Innovation
and
Entrepreneurs
hip
Duke
University
1520
2013-04-15
6
Coursera
Kenyon,
2013
Mathematical
Biostatistics
Bootcamp
Johns
Hopkins
University
2087
2013-04-16
7
Coursera
Jordan,
2013
Generating the
Wealth of
Nations
University of
Melbourne
500
2013-04-29
10
Coursera
Signsofchao
s blog, 2013
Sports and
Society
Duke
University
1626
2013-04-30
7
Coursera
Anderson,
2013
Introduction
to
International
Criminal Law
Case Western
Reserve
University
1432
2013-05-01
8
Coursera
Farkas,
2013
Inspiring
Leadership
through
Emotional
Intelligence
Case Western
Reserve
University
2013-05-01
8
Coursera
Farkas,
2013
Statistical
Molecular
Thermodynam
ics
University of
Minnesota
2013-05-20
8
Coursera
Friedrich,
2013
Introduction
to Systems
Biology
Icahn School
of Medicine at
Mount Sinai
2013-06-03
6
Coursera
Course site
at Coursera
Data analysis was conducted using linear regression carried out with Minitab statistical
software. Linear regression was chosen as the approach to analysis because at this stage
the aim of the research was exploratory, to identify potential trends rather than being
explanatory and seeking to fit a model. This would be a valuable goal for follow-up
research particularly if more consistent data became available for MOOCs more broadly.
Linear regression analyses were carried out individually according to different factors of
interest rather than as a single multiple regression due to issues of data consistency and
availability; that is, data is not available for every field in Tables 1 and 2 for every course,
so n varies according to different tests (see Results and Analysis section). Rather than
discarding courses for which the full spectrum of data was not available and in order to
gain the greatest insight possible into the different factors, a series of individual
regression analyses were carried out.
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
144
Limitations
There are a number of limitations which must be borne in mind with the approach
taken by this study, including issues of validity of data and reliability of the research
instruments used.
In terms of validity, it should be noted that the accuracy of figures varies according to
sources, with some institutions releasing highly accurate figures and others (particularly
when releasing enrolment data through the press) are rounded figures. This reflects the
fact that MOOC courses do not consistently release this information into the public
domain, and most of the courses that would have been eligible for inclusion (67.4%)
have not released any data. Of the institutions or instructors choosing to make data
available, bias may be introduced according to their motivations for publicizing this
information, which are unknown. There is also a degree of trust involved in the
information provided by student informants via the blog.
It should be emphasized that the study sought to be exploratory in nature, identifying
trends of interest in the data as a starting point for further research but not seeking to
explain or model the phenomenon. Reliability of the approach is less contentious as the
data have been collected via several rounds of internet searches during the data
collection period (February 13th to July 22nd 2013) and shown in full in Tables 1 and 2
should others wish to reproduce the tests or carry out alternative analyses. By collating
data ‘in the open’ at the author’s blog (Jordan, 2013), this offered a platform for others
(including course leaders) to scrutinize the data and provide more accurate figures in
some cases.
Results and Analysis
Trends in Total Enrolment Figures
Total enrolment numbers draws upon the data in both Tables 1 and 2, which comprises
a total of 91 courses (excluding three courses which are missing total enrolment figures).
Total enrolment figures range from 4,500 to 226,652 students, with a median value of
42,844. The data does not exhibit a normal distribution (Figure 1); six-figure
enrolments are not representative of the ‘typical’ MOOC. Total enrolments are shown
plotted against the date each course began in Figure 2. This demonstrates a negative
correlation, with enrolment numbers decreasing over time.
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
145
20000016000012000080000400000
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Total number of students enrolled
Frequency
Figure 1. Histogram of total enrolment numbers for the sampled courses (n = 91).
2013-07-01
2013-04-01
2013
-01-01
2012-10-01
2012-07-01
2012-04-01
2012-01-01
2011-10-01
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
Date course began
Total number of students enrolled
Figure 2. Scatterplot of total enrolment numbers plotted against course start date for
the sampled courses (n = 91).
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
146
A regression analysis was carried out, prior to which the data was subject to a Box-Cox
transformation as the residuals do not follow a normal distribution. Regression analysis
showed that date significantly predicted total enrolment figures at the 95% significance
level by the following formula: ln(Enrolled) = 104.249 - 0.00226915*StartDate (R2 =
0.1719, p < 0.001). The relationship is a negative correlation, indicating that as time has
progressed, enrolment figures have decreased. The relationship is relatively weak (time
as a factor accounts for 17.2% of the variance observed, as R2 is a measure of the fraction
of variance explained by the model; Grafen & Hails, 2002), although the sample is
sufficiently large that this is statistically significant (critical R2 values decrease according
to sample size, with an n of 91 being relatively large; Siegel, 2011). This highlights that a
focus upon figures from early courses is misleading and not representative of how the
field is developing.
The relationship between course length and total enrolments was also considered, and
found to demonstrate a positive correlation between course length and total enrolment
(Figure 3).
2520151050
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
Course length (weeks)
Total number of students enrolled
Figure 3. Scatterplot of total enrolment numbers plotted against course length for the
sampled courses (n = 87).
Following a Box-Cox transformation, regression analysis showed that course length
significantly predicted (at the 95% significance level) total enrolment figures by the
following formula: ln(Enrolled) = 10.2248 + 0.0491206*Length (R2 = 0.0545, p =
0.029). The correlation between the variables is positive, indicating courses that are
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
147
longer attract a greater number of enrolments. The relationship is relatively weak,
accounting for 5.5% of the variance observed, although the sample size is sufficiently
large for this to be a statistically significant relationship. This positive correlation may
suggest that prospective MOOC students prefer more substantial courses (however, see
also the relationship between course length and completion rates).
In addition, the relationship between university ranking and enrolment figures was
considered, although it was not found to be significant at the 95% level.
Trends in Completion Rates
Completion rates were calculated as the percentage of students (out of the total
enrolment for each course) who satisfied the criteria to gain a certificate for the course.
This information was available for 39 courses in the sample. Completion rates range
from 0.9% to 36.1%, with a median value of 6.5% (Figure 4). The data is skewed, so the
higher completion rates are not representative, with completion rates of 5% being
typical.
35302520151050
20
15
10
5
0
Percentage of total enrollment to complete course
Frequency
Figure 4. Histogram of completion rates for the sampled courses (n = 39).
As the residuals were not normally distributed, a Box-Cox transformation was again
carried out before conducting regression analysis. No significant relationships were
found between completion rate and date, university ranking, or the total number of
students enrolled. Completion rates remained consistent across these factors. A
significant negative correlation was found however between completion rate and course
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
148
length, shown in Figure 5. Regression analysis showed that course length significantly
predicted completion rate by the following formula: ln(PercentTotalCompleted) =
2.64802 - 0.100461*CourseLength (R2 = 0.2373, p = 0.002). The correlation in this case
is negative, indicating that a lower proportion of students complete longer courses.
Course length accounts for 23.4% of the variance observed, and the correlation is
significant at the 95% significance level.
252015105
40
30
20
10
0
Course length (weeks)
Percentage of total enrollment to complete course
Figure 5. Scatterplot of completion rate plotted against course length for the sampled
courses (n = 39).
While considering completion rate as the percentage of the total enrolment that
complete the course is the type of data that is most readily available, a criticism of this
characterization is that many students may enroll without even starting the course, and
that completion rates would be better characterized as the proportion of active students
who complete. This level of information is available for a subset of the sampled courses
(39 courses with a number of active students and total enrolment; 33 courses with data
about the proportion of active students who complete).
The number of active students is remarkably consistent as a proportion of the total
enrolment of the course (with approximately 50% of the total enrolment becoming
active students). This is shown graphically in Figure 6. Regression analysis showed that
total enrolment significantly predicted the number of active students by the following
formula: Active = 0.543336*Enrolled (R2 = 0.9556, p < 0.001). The correlation is strong
(accounting for 95.6% of the variance) and positive, showing a consistent relationship
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
149
between total enrolment and the percentage who become active students (being
approximately 54% of those who enroll).
250000200000150000100000500000
140000
120000
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
Total number of students enrolled
Number of active students
Figure 6. Scatterplot of number of active students plotted against total enrolment for
the sampled courses (n = 39).
When calculating completion rate as the percentage of active students who complete the
course, completion rates range from 1.4% to 50.1%, with a median value of 9.8% (Figure
7). While completion rates as a percentage of active students span a wider range than
completion rates as a percentage of total enrolments, there remains a strong skew
towards lower values. The differences here would be worthwhile to explore in further
detail to explore features of course design that may account for the wider variation
observed.
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
150
483624120
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Percentage of active students who complete course
Frequency
Figure 7. Histogram of completion rates as a proportion of active students for the
sampled courses (n = 39).
No significant relationships were found between completion rate as a proportion of
active users and date, university ranking, total enrolment, or (in contrast to completion
rate as a percentage of total enrolment) course length. This may suggest that enrolled
students may be put off starting longer courses, but this is less of an issue for those who
do become actively engaged in the course.
Conclusions
The findings here demonstrate changes in the field since the concept of MOOCs entered
the mainstream and the inception of the major MOOC platforms. It is misleading to
invoke early enrolment and completion figures as representative of the phenomenon;
six-figure enrolments are atypical, with the median average enrolment being 42,844
students, and decreasing over time as the number of courses available continues to
increase. Although this is lower than the earliest examples, it emphasizes that it is
inappropriate to compare completion rates of MOOCs to those in traditional bricks-and-
mortar institution-based courses.
The majority of courses have been found to have completion rates of less than 10% of
those who enroll, with a median average of 6.5%. The definition of completion rate used
here is the percentage of enrolled students who satisfied the courses’ criteria in order to
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
151
earn a certificate, and this definition was used because it is the type of information that
is most frequently available. There are potentially many ways in which MOOC students
may participate in and benefit from courses without completing the assessments. The
wider range of completion rates (while still remaining quite low overall, with a median
of 10%) observed when defining completion as a percentage of active learners in courses
is interesting and warrants further work to better understand the reasons why those
who become engaged initially do or do not complete courses.
This is not to say, however, that completion rates should be ignored entirely. Looking at
completion rates is a starting point for better understanding the reasons behind them,
and how courses could be improved for both students and course leaders. For example,
the relationship between enrolments, completion, and course length is an interesting
issue for MOOC course design, balancing the higher enrolments with the lower
completion rates of longer courses. Figures about how many students achieved
certificates obscure how many students attempted to gain a certificate but did not meet
the criteria. Given that MOOCs are offered free of educational prerequisites, striving to
improve teaching on courses so that students who wish to complete are assisted in doing
so is an important pedagogical issue. The extent of understanding that can be gained
outside of running a MOOC will continue to be constrained however as long as the
release of detailed data about courses is limited.
This study has only considered relationships between enrolment and completion and a
small number of general factors for which data is available publicly; various other
factors would be worthwhile to explore. For example, it would be useful to look at in
terms of the underlying pedagogy, whether differences emerged based on how
transmissive (so-called ‘xMOOCs’) or connectivist (‘cMOOCs’) courses are. The impact
of different assessment types, being necessarily linked to the criteria for achieving a
certificate of completion, would also be a worthwhile area to consider in further detail.
Along with the studies discussed in the introduction which focus upon links between
student demographics or behaviours and completion (Breslow et al., 2013; Kizilcec et
al., 2013; Koller et al., 2013), a limitation of the approach used here is that the data
neglects the student voice. While these approaches can identify trends and patterns,
they are unable to explore in detail the reasons behind the trends observed.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Professor Martin Weller and the two anonymous peer
reviewers for their comments on drafts of this paper. Special thanks to all of the MOOC
students, instructors, and other commentators who contributed data and thoughtful
comments about MOOC completion rates to the authors’ blog.
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
152
References
Adhikari, A. (2013). Completion. Stat2x, Spring 2013 blog. Retrieved from
http://stat2x.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/completion.html
Anderson, N. (2012). Grades are in for a pioneering free Johns Hopkins online class.
The Washington Post. Retrieved from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/college-inc/post/grades-are-in-for-a-
pioneering-free-johns-hopkins-online-class/2012/11/14/1bd60194-2e6b-11e2-
89d4-040c9330702a_blog.html
Anderson, S. (2013). Duke Sports and Society MOOC wraps up. Duke Center for
Instructional Technology blog: http://cit.duke.edu/blog/2013/07/duke-sports-
and-society-mooc-wraps-up/
Arnaud, C. H. (2013). Flipping chemistry classrooms. Chemical & Engineering News.
Retrieved from http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i12/Flipping-Chemistry-
Classrooms.html
Balch, T. (2013a). About MOOC completion rates: The importance of student
investment. The Augmented Trader blog:
http://augmentedtrader.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/about-mooc-completion-
rates-the-importance-of-investment/
Balch, T. (2013b). MOOC student demographics. The Augmented Trader blog:
http://augmentedtrader.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/mooc-student-
demographics/
Barber, M. (2013). Comment posted on the Introduction to Operations Management
page. Coursetalk.org: http://coursetalk.org/coursera/an-introduction-to-
operations-management
Belanger, Y. (2013). IntroAstro: An intense experience. Retrieved from
http://hdl.handle.net/10161/6679
Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach. Duke
University’s First MOOC:
http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/6216/Duke_Bi
oelectricity_MOOC_Fall2012.pdf
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013).
Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC.
Research and Practice in Assessment, 8, 13-25.
Burnette, D. (2012). The way of the future. The University of Virginia Magazine.
Retrieved from
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
153
http://uvamagazine.org/features/article/the_way_of_the_future#.UdrX_1Pp6
ic
Burton, G. (2013). Did they just say, “39,000 students enrolled in my Improvisation
course?” OMG!. Garyburton.com news/opinion:
http://www.garyburton.com/opinion/did-they-just-say-30000-students-
enrolled-in-my-improvisation-course-omg/
Campbell, G. (2013). The technicity story, part 2. The Technicity Story blog:
http://blogs.lt.vt.edu/technicitystory/2013/04/24/the-technicity-story-part-2/
Cervini, E. (2012) Mass revolution or mass con? Universities and open courses. Crikey.
At http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/18/mass-revolution-or-mass-con-
universities-and-open-courses/?wpmp_switcher=mobile
Chu, J. (2013). Duflo, Lander, Lewin to lead spring-semester MITx courses. MIT News:
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2013/mitx-spring-offerings-0131.html
Clark, S. (2013). Coursera – Introduction to music production by Loundon Stearns.
Bytes and Banter blog:
http://bytesandbanter.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/coursera-introduction-to-
music.html
Coursera. (2012). (DRAFT) Data export procedures. Retrieved from
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=forums&srcid=MDMyNTg5NzM4O
TAxMTY2NDg5NzEBMDEwNDAzNzI4ODgxODU0NTkwODQBLTkwOXZQa2h
uODRKATQBAXYy
Daniel, J. S. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and
possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved from
http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2012-18
Devlin, K. (2012a). Liftoff: MOOC planning part 7. Devlin’s Angle blog:
http://mooctalk.org/2012/09/21/mooc-planning-part-7/
Duke Today. (2012). Introduction to genetics and evolution, a preliminary report. Duke
Today: http://today.duke.edu/node/93914
Emanuel, E. J. (2013). Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature,
503(342). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/503342a
Evans, T. (2013). Here’s the scoop on Ohio State MOOCs. Digital Union, Ohio State
University: http://digitalunion.osu.edu/2013/04/01/osu-coursera-moocs/
Farkas, K. (2013). Case Western Reserve University’s free online courses exceeded
expectations. Cleveland.com:
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
154
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2013/07/case_western_reserve_u
niversit_9.html
Ferraro, K. (2013). Nutrition consulting. Ingrain Health:
http://www.ingrainhealth.com/nutrition-consulting.html
Florida Public Health Training Center. (2013). A public health refresher course. Florida
Public Health Training Center Online Mentor Program blog:
http://phmentorships.wordpress.com/2013/02/01/a-public-health-refresher-
course/
Friedrich, A. (2013). UMN faculty: MOOCs have made us rethink learning. On Campus:
http://blogs.mprnews.org/oncampus/2013/07/umn-faculty-moocs-have-
made-us-rethink-learning/
Furman University. (2013). TEDx FurmanU 2013 Redesigning Education Cast.
Tedxfurmanu.com website: http://www.tedxfurmanu.com/#!2013/c1g5h
Gillies, M. (2013). Creative programming for digital media & mobile apps. Marco Gillies
webpage at Goldsmiths, University of London:
http://www.doc.gold.ac.uk/~mas02mg/MarcoGillies/creative-programming-
for-digital-media-mobile-apps/
Grafen, A., & Hails, R. (2002). Modern statistics for the life sciences. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Guzdial, M. (2013). Slides from “The revolution will be televised” MOOCopalpse panel.
Computing Education blog:
http://computinged.wordpress.com/2013/03/09/slides-from-the-revolution-
will-be-televised-moocopalypse-panel/
Harder, B. (2013). Are MOOCs the future of medical education? BMJ Careers:
http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/view-article.html?id=20012502
Hawkins, D. (2013). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): The Thursday plenary
session. Against the Grain Blog: http://www.against-the-
grain.com/2013/06/massive-open-online-courses-moocs-the-thursday-
plenary-session/
Head, K. (2013). Inside a MOOC in progress. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/inside-a-mooc-in-
progress/44397
Heussner, K. M. (2013). More growing pains for Coursera: In another slip-up, professor
departs mid-course. Gigaom: http://gigaom.com/2013/02/19/more-growing-
pains-for-coursera-in-another-slip-up-professor-drops-out-mid-course/
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
155
Jordan, K. (2012). Networked life, social network analysis, & a new appreciation for
feedback. MoocMoocher blog:
http://moocmoocher.wordpress.com/2012/12/21/networked-life-social-
network-analysis-a-new-appreciation-for-feedback/
Jordan, K. (2013). Synthesising MOOC completion rates. MoocMoocher blog:
http://moocmoocher.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/synthesising-mooc-
completion-rates?
Kapsidelis, K. (2013). U. Va. set to launch global classrooms. Times Dispatch. Retrieved
from http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/local/education/college/u-va-set-
to-launch-global-classrooms/article_53fbd2b8-8bb1-58ff-8928-
1eaca612a103.html
Kenyon, A. (2013). Healthcare Innovation and Entrepreneurship final comments. Duke
Center for Instructional Technology blog:
http://cit.duke.edu/blog/2013/07/healthcare-innovation-and-
entrepreneurship-final-comments/
Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement:
Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Third
International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK ’13
Leuven, Belgium.
Koller, D., & Ng, A. (2013). The online revolution: Education for everyone. Seminar
presentation at the Said Business School, Oxford University, 28th January 2013.
Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQ-K-
sOW4fU&feature=youtu.be
Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). Retention and intention in massive open
online courses: In depth. Educause Review. Retrieved from
http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/retention-and-intention-massive-open-
online-courses-depth-0
Kolowich, S. (2013, March 21). The professors who make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of
Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-
Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905/#id=overview
Leckart, S. (2012). The Stanford education experiment could change higher education
forever. Wired Magazine. Retrieved from
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/03/ff_aiclass/3/
Lesiewicz, A. (2013). Drugs and the brain. ATA Science & Technology Division blog:
http://ata-sci-tech.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/drugs-and-brain.html
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
156
Lewin, T. (2012a). College of future could be come one, come all. The New York Times.
Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/20/education/colleges-turn-
to-crowd-sourcing-courses.html
Lewin, T. (2012b). One course, 150,000 students. The New York Times. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/20/education/edlife/anant-agarwal-
discusses-free-online-courses-offered-by-a-harvard-mit-
partnership.html?ref=education
Lugton, M. (2012). Review of the Coursera Human Computer Interaction Course blog:
http://reflectionsandcontemplations.wordpress.com/2012/07/14/review-of-
the-coursera-human-computer-interaction-course/
Malan, D. J. (2013). This was CS50x. CS50 blog: https://blog.cs50.net/2013/05/01/0/
Masolova, E. (2013). Interview with Daphne Koller, CEO of COURSERA. Eduson blog:
https://www.eduson.tv/blog/coursera
McKenna, L. (2012). The big idea that can revolutionize higher education: ‘MOOC’. The
Atlantic. Retrieved from
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/05/the-big-idea-that-can-
revolutionize-higher-education-mooc/256926/
Meyer, R. (2012). What it’s like to teach a MOOC (and what the heck’s a MOOC?). The
Atlantic. Retrieved from
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/what-its-like-to-
teach-a-mooc-and-what-the-hecks-a-mooc/260000/
Miller, H., & Odersky, M. (2012). Functional programming principles in Scala:
Impressions and statistics. Scala Documentation website: http://docs.scala-
lang.org/news/functional-programming-principles-in-scala-impressions-and-
statistics.html
Moran, M. (2013). Free online nutrition course kicks off May 6th. Vanderbilt News.
Retrieved from http://news.vanderbilt.edu/2013/05/coursera-nutrition/
Nelson, B. (2013). UF offers massive online learning for free. 1565today.com:
http://1565today.com/uf-offers-massive-learning-online-for-free/
Novicki, A. (2013). Medical Neuroscience in Coursera has just finished. Duke Center for
Instructional Technology blog: http://cit.duke.edu/blog/2013/07/coursera-
medical-neuroscience-week-3/
Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-
courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=1
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
157
Pattison, P. (2013). Coursera songwriting course starts July 19th. Patpattison.com:
http://www.patpattison.com/news/entry?id=16
Posey, J. (2013). Free Penn online course offers lessons on growing old. Penn News.
Retrieved from http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/news/free-penn-online-
course-offers-lessons-growing-old
Princeton University. (2012). Office of Information Technology administrative report,
September 07, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/oit/about/oit-
administrative-report/PDFs/Admin_09-12.pdf
Riddle, R. (2013a). Preliminary results on Duke’s third Coursera effort, “Think Again”.
Duke Center for Instructional Technology blog:
http://cit.duke.edu/blog/2013/06/preliminary-results-on-dukes-third-
coursera-effort-think-again/
Riddle, R. (2013b). Duke MOOCs: Looking back on “Image and Video Processing”. Duke
Center for Instructional Technology blog:
http://cit.duke.edu/blog/2013/06/looking-back-on-image-and-video-
processing/
Rivard, R. (2013). Three out of 2U. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/05/17/three-universities-back-
away-plan-pool-courses-online
Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like Courses: Two successful and
distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of
Open, Distance, and E-Learning. Retrieved from
http://www.eurodl.org/index.php?article=516
Roth, M. S. (2013). My modern experience teaching a MOOC. The Chronicle of Higher
Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/My-Modern-MOOC-
Experience/138781
Rushakoff, H. (2012). Free to learn: Geology, chemistry, and microeconomics are
among U of I’s first free online courses on Coursera. University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign College of Liberal Arts & Sciences News. Retrieved from
http://www.las.illinois.edu/news/2012/coursera/
Schmoller, S. (2012). Peter Norvig’s TED talk reflecting on creating and running the
online AI course. Schmoller.net: http://fm.schmoller.net/2012/07/peter-
norvigs-ted-talk-about-the-ai-course.html#more
Schmoller, S. (2013). Second report from Keith Devlin’s and Coursera’s Introduction to
Mathematical Thinking MOOC. Schmoller.net:
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
158
http://fm.schmoller.net/2013/06/second-report-from-keith-devlins-itmt-
course.html
Severance, C. (2012). Internet history, technology and security (IHTS) grand finale
lecture slides. Retrieved from
http://www.slideshare.net/fullscreen/csev/internet-history-technology-and-
security-grand-finale-lecture-20121001/7
Sharma, Y. (2013). Hong Kong MOOC draws students from around the world. The
Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from
http://chronicle.com/article/Hong-Kong-MOOC-Draws-
Students/138723/?cid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
Siegel, A. F. (2011). Practical business statistics (6th ed.). Oxford: Academic Press.
Siemens, G. (2012). MOOCs are really a platform. Elearnspace blog:
http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/
Signsofchaos blog. (2013). An assessment of a MOOC. Signsofchaos blog:
http://signsofchaos.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/an-assessment-of-mooc.html
Simply Statistics. (2012). Computing for data analysis (Simply statistics edition). Simply
Statistics blog: http://simplystatistics.org/2012/10/29/computing-for-data-
analysis-simply-statistics-edition/
St. Petersburg College. (2013). Alex Sharpe successfully completes University of Toronto
online course via Coursera. The CCIT Bulletin, St. Petersburg College. Retrieved
from http://www.spcollege.edu/ccit-bulletin/?p=1012
Stauffer, J. (2013). Connected Arctic educators discussion thread.
https://plus.google.com/114587962656605254648/posts/fmLmhDE9cSk
Times Higher Education. (2013). World university rankings 2012-2013. Retrieved from
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-
13/world-ranking
Unger, M. (2013). Eye on the future: Coursera. Penn Current. Retrieved from
http://www.upenn.edu/pennnews/current/2013-02-21/eye-future/eye-future-
coursera
University of Edinburgh. (2013). MOOCs @ Edinburgh 2013 Report #1. University of
Edinburgh:
http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/6683/1/Edinburgh%20MOOCs%
20Report%202013%20%231.pdf
University of Michigan. (2012). Halderman’s “Securing Digital Democracy” opens on
Coursera. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science:
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
159
http://www.eecs.umich.edu/eecs/about/articles/2012/Halderman_Coursera_l
aunch.html
University of Virginia. (2013). U. Va. Darden School’s first Coursera class reaches
71,000 registrants. University of Virginia Darden School of Business news.
Retrieved from http://www.darden.virginia.edu/web/Media/Darden-News-
Articles/2013/Dardens-First-Coursera-Class-Reaches-71000-Registrants/
Weinzimmer, S. (2012). Rice’s first Coursera class enrolls 54,00. The Rice Thresher.
Retrieved from http://www.ricethresher.org/rice-s-first-coursera-class-enrolls-
54-000-1.2932146#.UcsMlJw1DTo
Welsh, D. H. B., & Dragusin, M. (2013). The new generation of massive open online
courses (MOOCs) and entrepreneurship education. Small Business Institute
Journal, 9(1), 51-65.
Wesleyan University. (2013). Passion driven statistics. Wesleyan University
Quantitative Analysis Center: http://www.wesleyan.edu/qac/student-
profile/homepage_slideshow_coursera_information.html
Werbach, K. (2012). Gamification course wrap-up. PennOpenLearning YouTube
channel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrFmiqhBep4
Werbach, K. (2013). Gamification Spring 2013 statistics. Coursera Gamification
YouTube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8_3dNEMukQ&feature=youtu.be
Williams, K. (2013). Emory and Coursera: Benefits beyond the numbers. Emory news
center:
http://news.emory.edu/stories/2013/05/er_coursera_update/campus.html
Widom, J. (2012). From 100 students to 100,000. ACM SigMod Blog:
http://wp.sigmod.org/?p=165
Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher
education (JISC CETIS white paper). Retrieved from
http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667
Zhou, H. (2013). Duke University completes its first “Introductory Human Physiology”
MOOC! Duke Center for Instructional Technology blog:
http://cit.duke.edu/blog/2013/06/reflection-physio/
Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses
Jordan
Vol 15 | No 1 Feb/14
160
... However, one of the most significant challenges these platforms face is the low completion rate, which undermines their potential impact. Understanding and predicting student performance, particularly course completion times, is essential for developing strategies to enhance student engagement and success (Jordan, 2014;Hew & Cheung, 2014). ...
... Predicting course completion times in MOOCs is crucial due to historically low completion rates among students with diverse educational backgrounds (Jordan, 2014;Hew & Cheung, 2014). Accurate predictions can enhance course design and delivery, benefiting both students and educational institutions by providing targeted interventions to improve learning outcomes. ...
... Previous studies have highlighted various factors influencing student performance in MOOCs. Research by Jordan (2014) and Hew & Cheung (2014) emphasizes the diversity in educational backgrounds as a critical factor affecting completion rates. Additionally, Kizilcec, Piech, and Schneider (2013) and Lee, Choi, and Kim (2013) have explored the impact of student motivation, engagement levels, and participation rates on learning outcomes. ...
Article
In the realm of online asynchronous learning platforms, accurately tracking student performance to predictcourse completion times poses a significant challenge. Completion rates for MOOCs are typically low, with abias towards participants with higher education levels. Understanding factors such as student motivation,engagement, participation, and learning pathway design is crucial for improving student outcomes in onlinecourses. This research developed a predictive framework utilizing advanced deep learning techniques toaccurately forecast course completion times for participants enrolled in an introductory programming course("Python for Beginners" course on the Open Learning Platform of University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka). Byaccurately tracking student performance and leveraging a diverse dataset encompassing demographic andeducational variables, the research seeks to identify factors influencing course completion and predictindividual student outcomes. By utilising deep learning techniques, the prediction performance of the modelwill be improved, ultimately contributing to a more precise forecast of course completion times forparticipants. Evaluation of the model resulted in low Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.0080 and low MeanSquared Error (MSE) of 0.0033 which promises the effectiveness of the developed method in accuratelypredicting course completion times for students. The findings of this study may help increase the successfulcompletion rate of such courses which are delivered in the online asynchronous mode. The study employedadvanced deep learning models optimized through Bayesian methods, highlighting the potential of thesetechniques to enhance MOOC completion rates by offering precise forecasts and actionable insights intostudent engagement. The comprehensive analysis revealed that variables such as 'Current_Lesson', 'SessionTime Category', and 'District_Score' significantly influence completion times. The robust methodologicalframework, including feature engineering, model training, and hyperparameter optimization, sets a precedentfor future research in the field. This research contributes to educational data mining and predictive analytics,offering a scalable approach to improving completion rates and educational outcomes across various onlinelearning platforms. Future research should explore incorporating real-time data and longitudinal studies toenhance model accuracy and generalizability. Additionally, addressing potential biases in the dataset, such asdemographic, prior knowledge, and resource access disparities, is essential to ensure the fair and equitableapplication of the model across diverse student populations. Expanding the research to include a wider rangeof courses and institutions will further validate the model's robustness and applicability in differenteducational contexts.
... Moreover, MOOCs have democratized access to education, allowing students from around the world to access high-quality courses from leading universities. However, the effectiveness of MOOCs has been debated, with concerns about high dropout rates and the quality of learner engagement (Jordan, 2014). Nevertheless, MOOCs represent a significant step towards the global dissemination of knowledge and the reconfiguration of the traditional classroom. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article investigates the transformative impact of digital technologies on university education, particularly in light of the accelerated adoption driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aims to explore how these technologies have reshaped teaching and learning processes, focusing on their effectiveness, the challenges they present, and their future potential. The research is grounded in a thorough literature review, coupled with empirical data gathered from interviews with university teachers and students, and enhanced by insights from AI systems. The findings reveal a generally positive reception of digital tools, with significant benefits in enhancing student engagement, providing flexible access to educational resources, and supporting diverse learning modalities. However, the study also identifies key challenges, including the digital divide, the need for continuous faculty training, and the rapid pace of technological change. Additionally, the potential of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR) to further personalize and enrich the educational experience is highlighted. The article concludes that while digital technologies offer substantial opportunities for innovation in higher education, their successful integration requires strategic planning, robust policy frameworks, and sustained investment in infrastructure and professional development.
... En effet, Goulet et al. (2022) ont montré, au Canada, une participation bien moindre des étudiantes et étudiants lors de séances synchrones avec le corps enseignant. Aussi, une analyse plus profonde des usagers et usagères des cours en ligne ouverts massivement (CLOM) a montré par exemple que seules 9 % des personnes inscrites, qui s'étaient connectées au moins une fois, étaient allées au bout de leur formation (Jordan, 2014). En s'intéressant plus précisément à la notion d'« expectancy-value [attentes-valeurs] » d 'Eccles et Wigfield (2002), cette analyse vient donner une dimension plus pragmatique à la motivation et à l'engagement des personnes apprenantes, en mettant en avant leurs objectifs dans l'apprentissage (Poellhuber et al., 2016). ...
... Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), for example, are a direct product of this digital revolution. These platforms have democratized access to education by offering free or low-cost courses from top universities, enabling students from around the world to learn from renowned scholars without the need to relocate or pay hefty tuition fees (Jordan, 2014). Moreover, the proliferation of Learning Managment Systems (LMS) such as Canvas, Blackboard, and Moodle has facilitated the easy distribution of materials, assignment submissions, and collaboration among students and faculty, further fostering an interactive and accessible learning environment (Almarashdeh, 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
Digitalization has significantly transformed higher education, influencing teaching methodologies, learning experiences, and institutional operations. The integration of digital technologies into academic settings has led to increased accessibility, flexibility, and innovation in both curriculum design and delivery. This shift is not only reshaping how students engage with content but also how educators approach instruction, fostering a more personalized and student-centered learning environment. The rise of online learning platforms, digital libraries, and virtual classrooms has democratized access to education, especially for non-traditional students such as working professionals and individuals in remote areas. As a result, educational institutions are adopting blended learning models that combine traditional face-to-face instruction with digital resources, providing learners with greater autonomy and adaptability. Furthermore, digital tools are enabling real-time data collection and analysis, allowing for more effective student assessment and feedback mechanisms. Higher, the rapid digitalization of higher education also presents challenges, such as the digital divide, where students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds may lack access to necessary technological resources. Additionally, there are concerns regarding data privacy and the potential over-reliance on technology in educational settings. This paper aims to explore the multifaceted impact of digitalization on higher education, examining both its benefits and limitations.
Thesis
Full-text available
O progresso tecnológico tem levado a transformações nas formas como o ser humano interage com a informação e o conhecimento. Tais mudanças, consequentemente, trazem não apenas alterações como também novas possibilidades para a área da educação, sendo o surgimento de novas teorias e a popularização do ensino online exemplos disso. O presente trabalho apresenta o desenvolvimento e os resultados obtidos fruto de uma investigação no contexto dos Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). A partir da premissa da crescente complexidade das temáticas sendo tratadas em sala de aula, se propôs uma pesquisa voltada a identificação de princípios para a elaboração de atividades e contextos de aprendizagem que favoreçam a aprendizagem, em MOOCs, de tópicos entendidos como “de caráter aberto”. Fundamentado em uma teoria de aprendizagem para a era digital denominada Conectivismo, argumenta-se que os MOOCs possuem, em suas origens, respostas às necessidades que tópicos desta ordem demandam. Este potencial, porém, nunca foi atingido em sua totalidade devido a dificuldades de tradução da teoria em práticas tangíveis, e também um gradativo movimento de retorno a formas de aprendizagem as quais já se tenha costume (i.e., menos disruptivas). Assim sendo, a partir de uma análise do tópico dos MOOCs – em suas origens, bases pedagógicas, subtipos e dificuldades – e da Teoria da Conectivismo, foi desenvolvida uma intervenção na forma de um protótipo de MOOC Híbrido, inserido no contexto do ensino de design, propondo atividades e medidas que visavam viabilizar a aprendizagem de tópicos de caráter aberto através de um MOOC fundamentado na Teoria do Conectivismo. Os resultados obtidos apontam para o sucesso da intervenção, tendo os pontos críticos identificados sido relatados na forma de princípios de design que podem ser extrapolados para a construção de MOOCs com objetivos semelhantes.
Article
Full-text available
The Internet of Toys (IoToys) is viewed as a subset of the Internet of Things (IoT) and is being marketed as smart toys connected to the Internet that is introduced to children as everday toys. Despite the prevalence of IoToys and its potential for use in education, there is a noticeable absence of studies that seek to understand female teachers’ perceptions of integrating IoToys into early childhood education (ECE). The purpose of this exploratory mixed method study is to investigate ECE teachers’ perceptions of using IoToys in teaching ECE students, through analyzing qualitative and quantitative data. In the qualitative phase of data collection, semi-structured interviews were used for (8) ECE female teachers to obtain their perceptions of using IoToys in ECE and to determine indicators for constructing the quantitative questionnaire. Quantitative data was collected through a questionnare of (100) ECE teachers; with the aim of supporting the qualitative results of the research. The results showed that qualitative and quantitative analyses were consistent in identifying the most important opportunities and risks of IoToys usage. The opportunities of IoToys use include active interaction and social communication, enhancing 21st century skills, personalized education, and IoToys as a flexible learning environment. The most burning risks identified were privacy and cybersecurity, addiction to and emotional attachment to IoToys, and failure of time management as well.
Article
Full-text available
This paper investigated the factors affecting the behavioral intention (BI) and usage behavior (UB) of 548 Chinese college students in massive open online courses (MOOCs). We extended the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model by incorporating self‐regulated learning (SRL) management, perceived pleasure (PP), and perceived cost constructs. This study also analyzed the moderating role of individual differences in gender, grade, major, and experience in MOOCs. Data were collected through both offline surveys across 10 universities and an online survey platform. Results from structural equation modeling and multi‐linear regression analyses revealed that students' BI was significantly and positively influenced by six factors: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions (FC), social influence, SRL management (SM), and PP. Furthermore, we found that UB was predicted by BI, FC, and SM. Moreover, BI played a mediating role in the relationship between the two determining variables (i.e., FC and SM) and UB. Differences in MOOC experience level had a moderation effect. The study provided implications for various stakeholders regarding designing MOOC platforms, structures, and teaching activities.
Article
Full-text available
MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) are the educational buzzword of 2012. Media frenzy surrounds them and commercial interests have moved in. Sober analysis is overwhelmed by apocalyptic predictions that ignore the history of earlier educational technology fads. The paper describes the short history of MOOCs and sets them in the wider context of the evolution of educational technology and open/distance learning. While the hype about MOOCs presaging a revolution in higher education has focussed on their scale, the real revolution is that universities with scarcity at the heart of their business models are embracing openness. We explore the paradoxes that permeate the MOOCs movement and explode some myths enlisted in its support. The competition inherent in the gadarene rush to offer MOOCs will create a sea change by obliging participating institutions to revisit their missions and focus on teaching quality and students as never before. It could also create a welcome deflationary trend in the costs of higher education. Explanatory Note During my time as a Fellow at the Korea National Open University (KNOU) in September 2012 media and web coverage of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) was intense. Since one of the requirements of the fellowship was a research paper, exploring the phenomenon of MOOCs seemed an appropriate topic. This essay had to be submitted to KNOU on 25 September 2012 but the MOOCs story is still evolving rapidly. I shall continue to follow it. 'What is new is not true, and what is true is not new'. Hans Eysenck on Freudianism This paper is published by JIME following its first release as a paper produced as part of a fellowship at the Korea National Open University (KNOU). Both the original and this republication are available non-exclusively under Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY). Apart from this note and minor editorial adjustments the paper is unchanged. Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE
Technical Report
Full-text available
This report sets out to help decision makers in higher education institutions gain a better understanding of the phenomenon of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) and trends towards greater openness in higher education and to think about the implications for their institutions. The phenomena of MOOCs are described, placing them in the wider context of open education, online learning and the changes that are currently taking place in higher education at a time of globalisation of education and constrained budgets. The report is written from a UK higher education perspective, but is largely informed by the developments in MOOCs from the USA and Canada. A literature review was undertaken focussing on the extensive reporting of MOOCs through scholarly blogs, press releases as well as openly available reports and research papers. This identified current debates about new course provision, the impact of changes in funding and the implications for greater openness in higher education. The theory of disruptive innovation is used to help form the questions of policy and strategy that higher education institutions need to address.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
As MOOCs grow in popularity, the relatively low completion rates of learners has been a central criticism. This focus on completion rates, however, reflects a monolithic view of disengagement that does not allow MOOC designers to target interventions or develop adaptive course features for particular subpopulations of learners. To address this, we present a simple, scalable, and informative classification method that identifies a small number of longitudinal engagement trajectories in MOOCs. Learners are classified based on their patterns of interaction with video lectures and assessments, the primary features of most MOOCs to date. In an analysis of three computer science MOOCs, the classifier consistently identifies four prototypical trajectories of engagement. The most notable of these is the learners who stay engaged through the course without taking assessments. These trajectories are also a useful framework for the comparison of learner engagement between different course structures or instructional approaches. We compare learners in each trajectory and course across demographics, forum participation, video access, and reports of overall experience. These results inform a discussion of future interventions, research, and design directions for MOOCs. Potential improvements to the classification mechanism are also discussed, including the introduction of more fine-grained analytics.
Article
Gabriela C. Weaver doesn’t lecture to her general chemistry students—at least not in class. She records short lecture snippets that the students watch online before showing up. During the class period, the students work problems while the Purdue University chemistry professor wanders around the room, observing students, answering their questions, and looking for concepts that are giving them trouble. Weaver’s strategy is part of a growing trend called inverted instruction or flipped classrooms. In this approach, professors deliver lectures or other class content over the Web via prerecorded videos during the time students would traditionally be doing homework. During the scheduled class time, students work on problems, either alone or in teams. “The whole idea of flipping the classroom and putting most of the content delivery outside of class time is that it frees up class for other stuff,” says physicist Robert J. Beichner of North Carolina State University. “You ...
Article
Massive open online courses are the educational happening of the moment. Everyone wants in. No one is quite sure what they’re getting into.