The Doctor’s New Clothes: Professional or Fashionable?

Abstract

Abstract
Objective: To investigate the influence of the GP’s attire on the confidence that patients have in their GP as a
medical expert and on the patient’s comfort level (defined as ‘feel at ease’).
Design: A cross-section study without control group.
Methods: Participants (n=1506 ) completed a survey on the internet or in paper after seeing images of six models
of three different age categories, each in five different clothing styles (leisure clothing, casual, semiformal, formal and
professional). The following questions were asked for each model: “In which doctor do you have the most confidence
as a medical expert?” and “With which doctor do you feel most at ease?”.
Results: Patients trusted a female doctor and the older male doctor most when wearing professional clothing
(white coat). The young and middle aged GP’s were preferred to wear semiformal attire. Patients were most at ease
with a female GP wearing leisure clothing. They preferred the young and middle aged male GP to wear semiformal
attire, while patients were most at ease with the older male GP wearing casual clothing.
Conclusion: The GP’s attire has an influence on the patient’s confidence and comfort level. In general patients still
mainly prefer a doctor in a professional outfit.

Full text

Primary Health Care: Open Access
Hartmans et al., Primary Health Care 2014, 3:3
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-1079.1000145
Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000145
Primary Health Care
ISSN: 2167-1079 PHCOA, an open access journal
Open Access
Research Article
The Doctor’s New Clothes: Professional or Fashionable?
Chantal Hartmans1, Stefanie Heremans1, Marieke Lagrain1, Kristin Van Asch1 and Birgitte Schoenmakers2*
1Department of Public Health and Primary Care Academic Centre of General Practice, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2Academic Teaching Practice, Department of Public Health Academic Centre of General Practice, Leuven, Belgium
*Corresponding author: Schoenmakers B, Department of Public Health,
Academic Centre of General Practice, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer
33, block J, box 7001, Leuven, Belgium, Tel: +32495235639; E-mail:
Birgitte.schoenmakers@med.kuleuven.be
Received November 25, 2013; Accepted December 30, 2013; Published January
07, 2014
Citation: Hartmans C, Heremans S, Lagrain M, Asch KV, Schoenmakers B (2014)
The Doctor’s New Clothes: Professional or Fashionable? Primary Health Care 3:
145. doi:10.4172/2167-1079.1000145
Copyright: © 2014 Hartmans C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.
Keywords: General practitioner; condence; wellbeing; clothing
style; communication; medical sociology
Introduction
e clothing style of each professional has an important impact on
presentation, credibility and appearance. Formal health care providers
who are not wearing professional gear, have to guard and defend their
professional attitude. General practitioners opted many years ago to
abandon their white coats. Besides, a general practitioner is for many
patients the counselor and trusted person par excellence. Patients
expect a GP to prove scientic medical knowledge and skills, as well
as to perform with a listening ear and moral support. Moreover, a
good doctor-patient relationship is a basic requirement for good
care provision. Without white coat, the way a GP dresses will have a
signicant inuence on the development of the physician-patient
relationship [1-3].
e clothing style is determined by tradition and fashion. For
centuries, the white coat is seen as the symbol of the physician.
Previous studies on the clothing style of doctors showed dierent
results. Various studies have shown that a white coat is still preferred by
many patients [4-6]. Others, one study revealed that the disappearance
of medical paternalism has caused lower popularity of the white coat
[7]. Particularly, in the case of pediatricians and psychiatrists, the white
coat has lost its importance [8,9]. A study conducted in New Zealand
demonstrated that patients prefer a semi formal outt for their treating
medical doctor [7]. All the above mentioned studies have been carried
out in a specialist setting. Little research has been done on the clothing
style of GP’s. A single study from the Netherlands showed that formal
attire generates more condence in patients. e white coat, however,
was omitted here [10].
e major research question of this study was: do the clothes make
the family doctor? is study examined whether the attire of the GP
aects the condence and the ‘feel at ease’ of patients
Methods
Research questions and outcome
In this study, two issues were examined:
− Has the clothing of GPs an eect on the condence that patients
have in a GP?
− Do patients feel more at ease with a certain clothing style of
the GP?
e outcome measures were dened as the condence of the patient
in the doctor as a medical expert and the patients’ feeling ‘at ease’ with
the doctor.
e following questions were formulated for each model: “In which
doctor/clothing style do you have the most condence on the level
of medical aairs?” and “Which doctor/clothing style makes you feel
most at ease?”. e participants were asked to make a single preference.
Finally, socio-demographic information was requested: age, sex,
occupation, highest educational level and whether the participant has a
regular GP. Participants completed the survey independently, without
interview, to avoid any interference and to guarantee anonymity.
Study Population
A questionnaire was developed based upon earlier research and
with additional items. is questionnaire was distributed from 11-
04-2013 until 28-05-2013 through social media (Facebook, Senioren
Net) and e-mail. In addition, from 15-04-2013 until 17-05-2013
paper versions of the survey were deposited in the waiting rooms of
medical polyclinics and of ve representatives (certied as regional
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the inuence of the GP’s attire on the condence that patients have in their GP as a
medical expert and on the patient’s comfort level (dened as ‘feel at ease’).
Design: A cross-section study without control group.
Methods: Participants (n=1506 ) completed a survey on the internet or in paper after seeing images of six models
of three different age categories, each in ve different clothing styles (leisure clothing, casual, semiformal, formal and
professional). The following questions were asked for each model: “In which doctor do you have the most condence
as a medical expert?” and “With which doctor do you feel most at ease?”.
Results: Patients trusted a female doctor and the older male doctor most when wearing professional clothing
(white coat). The young and middle aged GP’s were preferred to wear semiformal attire. Patients were most at ease
with a female GP wearing leisure clothing. They preferred the young and middle aged male GP to wear semiformal
attire, while patients were most at ease with the older male GP wearing casual clothing.
Conclusion: The GP’s attire has an inuence on the patient’s condence and comfort level. In general patients still
mainly prefer a doctor in a professional outt.

Citation: Hartmans C, Heremans S, Lagrain M, Asch K V, Schoenmakers B (2014) The Doctor’s New Clothes: Professional or Fashionable? Primary
Health Care 3: 145. doi:10.4172/2167-1079.1000145
Page 2 of 5
Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000145
Primary Health Care
ISSN: 2167-1079 PHCOA, an open access journal
reference and academic teaching practices) group practices of general
practitioners. e questionnaire could be completed by anyone aged
18 or more. Since in Belgium all citizens are equally insured by the
national social security system, all medical houses and polyclinics are
accessible to all patients.
Design
e study was performed in a cross-section without control group.
e survey showed six doctor-models presenting with ve dierent
clothing styles. Images were taken against a neutral background and
models were presented in the same position, with a similar facial
expression by a professional photographer. e six models represented
each a dierent category of general practitioners: the very young female
doctor (25-35 years), the female doctor (35-50 years), the older female
doctor (>50 years), the very young male doctor (25-35), the male doctor
(35-50 years) and older male doctor (>50 years).
e ve clothing styles were dened as follows:
−Leisure Clothing: for men a T-shirt, jeans and sneakers, for
women T-shirt, jeans and ballet ats, boots or sneakers.
−Casual: for men casual shirt or sweater dressed with shirt
underneath, a casual pants or dark jeans and sporting dressier
shoes, for women T-shirt, skirt or dressy pants and ats or
boots.
−Semi-formal: for men a shirt with possibly a sporty jacket,
pants and dress shoes, for women blouse, skirt with tights or
possibly a smart pants and shoes with a small heel.
−Formally: for the men dressed with a shirt jacket, trousers and
dress shoes, the women a smart dress with a blazer or a suit.
−Professional: aforementioned semi-formal outt with white
coat.
− All models were asked to choose the outts from their own
clothing collection. If necessary, the authors revised the
personal clothing choice to guarantee a representative and
conform look (Appendix 1).
e images were printed in color, format A4, sorted by model
and bundled in the above mentioned and x sequence for the paper
questionnaire. e online questionnaireshowedfor each model the ve
images next to each other, in the same order as listed above.
Statistical analysis
A univariate analysis was used to in answer to the primary
research question and to describe the socio-demographic features
of the participants. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis was applied
by a logistic regression in SAS 9.3, with the independent variables
being gender, age and education and dependent variables being
condence in the doctor in the medical eld and to feel at ease with
the doctor. Odds ratios with 95% condence intervals were described
for each dependent variable in relation to the subsequent independent
variables.
Ethical approval
e Medical Ethics Committee of K.U. Leuven University Hospital
approved the study as part of the Master esis to achieve the title
of Master in Medicine. A written informed consent of the study
participants is in Belgium only required when medical data on patients
are involved.
Results
Study population
e total group consisted of 1506 patients. 1324 of them have
completed the entire questionnaire. e data of the incomplete
questionnaires were handled as ‘missings’ (computation of missings in
SAS 9.3).
e average age of the patients was 38.35 years and 68.29% of the
participants were female (n = 911). With regard to education, the majority
of participants were highly skilled: 32.46% had a higher education
diploma (n=436) and 38.64% obtained a university degree (n=519).
Of all participants 27.58% were employees, 26.02% students, 13.53%
ocials, 7,14% independent professionals, 4.83% laborer and 20.90%
housewife or –man, unemployed, disabled, retired or otherwise.
91,14% (n=1224) of all participants group had a regular general
practitioner (Table 1).
Condence in the doctor as medical expert (appendix 2)
e study found that patients have the most condence in a female
doctor wearing a white coat. As regards model 1, 49.56% (n=730) chose
the professional outt, in our second model 51.52% (n=745) and in
model 3 amounted this 44.22% (n=631). e age of the female doctor did
not aect this preference (Appendix gure 1). e remaining sequence
diered in function of the age of the female doctor. It appeared that
patients chose as second option the formal clothing in the young female
doctor (26.14%, n=385). As third choice the leisure outt was chosen
(9.98%, n=147), followed by the casual (7.47%, n=110) and semi-formal
clothing (6.68%, n=101). Regarding the middle-aged female doctor,
patients secondly selected the leisure outt (17.57%, n=254), followed
by the semi-formal attire (14.04%, n=203), casual wear (9.75%, n=141)
and formal clothes (7.12%, n=103).
Concerning the elderly female general practitioner nally, leisure
clothes were most trust worthy, aer the professional outt (23.06%,
n=329). ese choices were followed by the semi-formal attire (18.50%,
n=264), the formal attire (10.79%, n=154) and casual clothing (3.43%,
n=49).
As regards the male doctor, there was in terms of condence rather
a preference for semi formal attire: in both the younger doctor (43.41%,
n=606), as the middle-aged doctor (48.15%, n=662), the majority of
Feature % of total group
Male 31.75
Female 68.29
18-25y 34.59
26-45y 31.12
46-65y 28.93
>65y 5.36
Diploma elementary or secondary school 28.89
Diploma graduate school or university 71.10
Employee 27.58
Student 26.02
Ofcial 13.53
Independent 7.14
Laborer 4.83
Housewife, unemployed, retired, disabled or others 20.9
Regular general practitioner 91.14
Table 1: Socio-demographic data of participants group.

Citation: Hartmans C, Heremans S, Lagrain M, Asch K V, Schoenmakers B (2014) The Doctor’s New Clothes: Professional or Fashionable? Primary
Health Care 3: 145. doi:10.4172/2167-1079.1000145
Page 3 of 5
Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000145
Primary Health Care
ISSN: 2167-1079 PHCOA, an open access journal
patients chose semi-formal clothing as most condent outt. e
professional clothing endedona second place in both models (model
4 32.16% n=449; Model 5 27.56% n=379). Regarding the older male
doctor, the patients chose the white coat (38.11%, n=519) as most
condent outt, but the casual clothing was a good second choice
(38.03%, n=518) (Appendix gure 2). e semi formal attire followed
in third place (16.01%, n=218).
Wellbeing: feeling at ease with the doctor (appendix 2)
Patients were most at ease with a female doctor wearing leisure
outt, regardless of age (model 1 30.69% n=452; Model 2 31.33%
n=453; Model 3 48.49% n=692) (Appendix gure 3). For all three age
groups the professional outt was chosen as third option (model 1
20.23% n=298; Model 2 23.65% n=342; Model 3 18.22% n=260).
In male general practitioners, there was again a distinction between
the younger doctor and middle aged doctor, compared to the older
male general practitioner. Patients indicated that they were most at
ease with a young or middle aged general practitioner in semi formal
attire (model 4 38.18% n=533; Model 5 41.31% n=568). In both cases,
there was also an equal preference sequence: aer semi-formal attire
most patients opted for leisure clothing (model 4 26.93% n=376; Model
5 26.47% n=364), followed by casual clothes (model 4 19 , 13% with
n=267; model 5 17.24% n=237), professional clothing (model 4 12.32%
n=172; model 5 11.05% n=152) and formal attire (model 4 3.44% with
n=48, model 5 with 3.93% n=54).
Patients felt most at ease at a older male general practitioner,
wearing casual clothes (61.01%, n=831) (Appendix gure 4). is
decision was followed by the white coat (14.98%, n=204) and semi-
formal clothing (14.24%, n=194). Leisure clothing was now chosen as a
last option (4.7%, n=64) (Table 2).
Factors inuencing the preference of the participants
e analysis showed that a number of socio-demographic data
had an impact on the choices patients made. Regarding the outcome
‘condence’ participants with a diploma of higher secondary education
less oen chose professional clothing, compared with participants who
had a university degree (odds ratios: model 1 0,670; Model 2 0.735;
model 5 0.729; model 6 0.636). Age also appeared to be important:
participants between 18 and 25 years chose less oen a white coat when
it came to condence than participants being older than 65 years (odds
ratios: 0.602 Model 1, Model 3 0.703, 0.587 Model 5). e other features
did not signicantly inuence the preference of the participants (Table
3).
Regarding the outcome ‘feel at ease’, there were also a number of
socio-demographic data which were found to inuence preference
of the participants. In particular, the age played a major role in the
preferences: for all six models participants between 18 and 25 years and
26-45 years chose more oen a white coat to feel at ease, compared to
participants older than 65 years (odds ratios: model 1 2,886 and 2,091,
3,377 and 2,666 model 2, model 3 2.344 and 2.565, 3.605 and 3.021
model 4, model 5 2.172 and 1.675, model 6 2.702 and 2.009). In model
2, 3 and 4, participants between 46 and 65 years chose more oen a
white coat compared to those over 65 years (odds ratios: 1.898 Model
2, Model 3 1.972, 1.919 Model 4). e results also showed that gender
plays a role: men chose less oen professional clothing to feel at ease
than women (odds ratios: model 1 0,695; Model 2 0.689, 0.785 Model
3, model 6 0.747). e other features did not signicantly inuence the
preference of the participants (Table 4).
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model6
%
Leisure Condence 9.98 9.75 23.06 5.80 7.05 0.95
wellbeing 30.69 31.33 48.49 26.93 26.47 4.70
Casual Condence 7.47 17.57 3.43 13.68 7.49 38.03
wellbeing 19.35 27.66 8.27 19.13 17.24 61.01
Semi-formal Condence 6.86 14.04 18.50 43.41 48.15 16.01
wellbeing 7.47 11.62 19.62 38.18 41.31 14.24
Formal Condence 26.14 7.12 10.79 4.94 9.75 6.90
wellbeing 22.27 5.74 5.40 3.44 3.93 5.07
Professional Condence 49.56 51.52 44.22 32.16 27.56 37.11
wellbeing 20.23 23.65 18.22 12.32 11.05 14.98
Table 2: Percentage distribution by clothing for condence and wellbeing.
OR (95%CI) P
Effect Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Male vs female ns ns ns ns ns ns
Primary school vs university ns ns ns 0.3 (0.1-0.7) p 0.08 ns ns
Lower second vs university ns ns ns ns ns ns
Upper second vs university 0.7 (05-0.9) p 0.5 0.7 (0.6-0.9) p 0.4 ns ns 0.7 (0.6-0.9) p 0.9 0.6 (0.5-0.8) p 0.7
Graduate vs university 0.7 (0.6-0.9) p0.9 ns ns ns ns ns
18-25y vs >65y 0.6 (0.4-0.9) p 0.0009 ns ns ns ns ns
26-45y vs >65y ns ns ns ns 0.6 (0.4-0.9) p 0.03 ns
46-65 vs >65y ns ns ns ns ns ns
OR: odds ratio; ns = OR not signicant (95%CI containing 1); p = p value
Table 3: Odds ratio, 95% condence interval and p-value, as regards condence

Citation: Hartmans C, Heremans S, Lagrain M, Asch K V, Schoenmakers B (2014) The Doctor’s New Clothes: Professional or Fashionable? Primary
Health Care 3: 145. doi:10.4172/2167-1079.1000145
Page 4 of 5
Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000145
Primary Health Care
ISSN: 2167-1079 PHCOA, an open access journal
Discussion
In this study, the impact of GP-clothing style on the condence
and on the ‘feel at ease’ of patients was observed. Results showed that
there are clear dierences between clothing styles regarding the ‘feel at
ease’ of patients and the condence they have in the medical expertise
of their General Practitioner (GP). Here, the gender of the physician
played a role. Patients had most condence in a female GP when she
wore a white coat, while the male young and middle-aged practitioner
was trusted when presenting in semiformal attire. In case of the older
male doctor, patients preferred the white coat.
On the ‘feel at ease ‘level of the patient, the gender of the GP
determined the preferences. Leisure clothing is opted for the female
doctor, while the semiformal outt is preferred for the young and
middle-aged male practitioner. Patients also preferred to see the older
male doctor in casual attire (Table 2).
Regarding these results and in agreement with other research, the
white coat still seemed to be the symbol of a trustworthy doctor [2,3].
Still, this was quite surprisingly, since it was stressed that each model
represented a general practitioner and not a specialist. An explanation
of this odd observation might be that in Belgium the specialist can
also be consulted in a primary care setting. Specialists, considered
as a higher echelon of care in the society, wear the white coat more
oen than GPs do [3,11]. is combination might mean that patients
in Belgium are accustomed to the image of the white coat, relate this
garment to a specialist and therefore grant more trust to the owner of
it. e popularity of the white coat was also observed in other studies.
e dierence lied in the fact that these latter studies took place in a
specialized setting [4]. Unlike these studies most participants in our
study choose a non professional gear to feel at ease with a GP. It could be
concluded that the white coat was experienced as an additional barrier
in the doctor-patient-relationship in the GP setting.
ere is a remarkable dierence in the preferences made for the older
male doctor, for both ‘condence’ and ‘feel at ease’ in comparison with
his younger and female colleagues. As with the female doctors, the white
coat was opted when it comes to condence in the medical expertise.
is clothing was considered as more decent compared to the clothing of
his younger colleagues (Table 2). A Dutch study also noted a dierence
regarding the older male doctor: casual clothing was little appreciated
when worn by the older male doctor [10]. In this latter study there
was no white coat included and only the ‘condence’ of the patient was
questioned. In this Dutch study a there appeared a major population bias:
in one study group all participants were over 65 years, the other group
only consisted of professionals in the healthcare sector. Finally, in our
study less formal attire was chosen, when it comes to feel at ease with the
doctor. A casual outt is then preferred for the older male doctor.
Socio-demographic data aected the preferences of the participants.
In the nal analysis, profession was omitted as a variable, considering that
it was too little discriminatory with the educational level. Similarly, the
question “Do you have a regular GP?” was removed from the analysis,
given nearly all participants had a regular family doctor. Regarding
to condence, older and higher educated patients prefer a white coat-
doctor. e eect of age was also reported in a study in Britain where
over-70s also opted signicantly more the white coat [5]. is might be
explained by a more traditional view on society and role patterns. e
higher educated patient preferring white coats was a rather surprising
observation. Perhaps these patients mirror themselves and their social
and professional position to the doctor in front of them and expect him/
her toclearlyexceed them in expertise. Patients with al lower educational
level might settle with ‘doctor’ as a trustworthy title and personality.
Regarding ‘feel at ease’, the age and gender of the participant aected
the preferences for some models. Younger and female participants
preferred a white coat to feel at ease with a doctor. Apparently, younger
patients didn’t want to ‘friend’ their doctor and preferred to keep a
certain distance when it comes to personal interaction. Female patients
also might, motivate by a more traditional background, feel more at
ease when a doctor is dressed up professionally.
e eect of educational level seemed not a predictor of the patients’
preference. A possible explanation was that health care in Belgium is
aordable and open for all citizens. e threshold for visiting a doctor is
therefore low for all socio-economic classes. All people felt at ease with
their doctor regardless of his clothing style. An additional remark is
that the low educated group in this study was rather under-represented,
making it dicult to give a meaningful statement.
Limitations and Recommendations
is study also has some limitations. Some clothing styles resembled
too much and a meaningful discrimination of preferences was therefore
compromised. Leisure and casual attire were rather similar in both
female and male doctors. Another weakness in the study is a possible
sequence bias. However, the xed order, as mentioned above, also
provide a certain visual rest in the large amount of images.
In this study it was decided not to add the option “no preference”.
is could be a limitation but on the other hand it also allowed obtaining
more signicant results. Finally, this study was based on images and
cannot be unconditionally translated to the daily practice. Moreover,
the doctor-patient relationship (at long notice) is not only based on a
rst impression.
Strengths of the study are the large and representative study sample,
the rm instructions given to the doctor models concerning the
clothing style and the professional recordings.
OR (95%CI) P
Effect Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Male vs female 0.7 (0.6-0.9) p0.0008 0.7 (0.5-0.8) p 0.0006 0.8 (0.6-0.9) p 0.08 ns ns 0.7 (0.6-0.9) p 0.01
Primary school vs university ns ns ns ns ns 0.4 (0.1-0.9) p 0.05
Lower second vs university ns ns ns ns ns ns
Upper second vs university 0.7 (05-0.9) p 0.1 ns ns ns ns ns
Graduate vs university 0.7 (0.6-0.9) p0.9 ns ns ns ns ns
18-25y vs >65y 2.9 (1.8-4.6) p<0.0001 3.4 (2.1-5.5) p<0.0001 2.3 (1.4-3.8) p 0.02 3.6 (2.2-5.9) p<0.0001 1.1 (0.8-1.4) p 0.3 2.7 (1.6-4.4) p<0.0001
26-45y vs >65y 2.1 (1.3-3.3) p 0.02 2.7 (1.6-4.3) p 0.004 2.6 (1.6-4.1) p 0.0008 3.0 (1.8-4.9) p 0.003 1.7(1.03-2.7) p 0.2 2.0 (1.2-3.3) p 0.04
46-65 vs >65y ns 1.9 (1.2-3.1) p 0.5 2.0 (1.2-3.2) p 0.5 1.9 (1.2-3.1) p 0.3 ns ns
OR: odds ratio; ns = OR not signicant; (95%CI containing 1); p = p value
Table 4: Odds ratio, 95% condence interval and p-value, as regards wellbeing.

Citation: Hartmans C, Heremans S, Lagrain M, Asch K V, Schoenmakers B (2014) The Doctor’s New Clothes: Professional or Fashionable? Primary
Health Care 3: 145. doi:10.4172/2167-1079.1000145
Page 5 of 5
Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000145
Primary Health Care
ISSN: 2167-1079 PHCOA, an open access journal
As far as we know, this is also the rst study in Belgium and
worldwide that assessed the inuence of clothing on the ‘condence’
and ‘feel at ease’ with general practitioners. As already mentioned, a
good doctor-patient relationship is essential. If clothing contributes
to the condence of the patient, it is denitely important to perform
further research on this topic. For instance, does clothing style of their
own GP inuence the preference of the patients? Is the white coat
more selected by patients who are oen in a hospital setting? ere are
few studies on this subject so far. Given the eect shown in this study,
further research is therefore recommended.
Conclusion
is study showed a clear inuence of the GP’s attire on the patient’s
condence in the GP as a medical expert and on the patient’s comfort
level (feel at ease). Female doctors were expected to wear a white coat in
order to be trusted while male doctors can aord a more relax clothing
style. To feel at ease, patients preferred female doctors in leisure wear
while male doctors were expected to be more dressed up. It seems that
female doctors still have to ‘earn ‘patients’ condence while they are at
the same ‘this nice woman from next door’ when patients are in need
for a talk.
Finally, it is appropriate for a GP to pay attention to his/her
attire, seen the inuence of the clothing style on the doctor-patient
relationship. Because of the eect found in this study and the limited
amount of studies about this topic, further investigation is strongly
recommended.
References
1. Gallagher J, Waldron Lynch F, Stack J, Barragry J (2008) Dress and address:
patient preferences regarding doctor’s style of dress and patient interaction. Ir
Med J 101: 211-213.
2. McKinstry B, Wang JX (1991) Putting on the style: what patients think of the
way their doctor dresses. Br J Gen Pract 41: 270, 275-278.
3. Neinstein LS, Stewart D, Gordon N (1985) Effect of physician dress style on
patient-physician relationship. J Adolesc Health Care 6: 456-459.
4. Rehman SU, Nietert PJ, Cope DW, Kilpatrick AO (2005) What to wear today?
Effect of doctor’s attire on the trust and condence of patients. Am J Med 118:
1279-1286.
5. Douse J, Derrett-Smith E, Dheda K, Dilworth JP (2004) Should doctors wear
white coats? Postgrad Med J 80: 284-286.
6. Sotgiu G, Nieddu P, Mameli L, Sorrentino E, Pirina P, et al. (2012) Evidence
for preferences of Italian patients for physician attire. Patient Prefer Adherence
6: 361-367.
7. Lill MM, Wilkinson TJ (2005) Judging a book by its cover: descriptive survey
of patients’ preferences for doctors’ appearance and mode of address. BMJ
331: 1524-1527.
8. Zwart DL, Kimpen JL (1997) [The white coat in pediatrics: link between
medical history and preference for informally dressed physicians]. Ned Tijdschr
Geneeskd 141: 2020-2024.
9. Nihalani ND, Kunwar A, Staller J, Lamberti JS (2006) How should psychiatrists
dress?--a survey. Community Ment Health J 42: 291-302.
10. Kocks JW, Lisman-van Leeuwen Y, Berkelmans PG (2010) [Clothing make the
doctor--patients have more condence in a smartly dressed GP]. Ned Tijdschr
Geneeskd 154: A2898.
11. Cha A, Hecht BR, Nelson K, Hopkins MP (2004) Resident physician attire: does
it make a difference to our patients? Am J Obstet Gynecol 190: 1484-1488.
Submit your next manuscript and get advantages of
OMICS Group submissions
Unique features:
User friendly/feasible website-translation of your paper to 50 world’s leading languages
Audio Version of published paper
Digital articles to share and explore
Special features:
300 Open Access Journals
25,000 editorial team
21 days rapid review process
Quality and quick editorial, review and publication processing
Indexing at PubMed (partial), Scopus, DOAJ, EBSCO, Index Copernicus and Google Scholar etc
Sharing Option: Social Networking Enabled
Authors, Reviewers and Editors rewarded with online Scientic Credits
Better discount for your subsequent articles
Submit your manuscript at: http://omicsgroup.info/editorialtracking/primary-health
Citation: Hartmans C, Heremans S, Lagrain M, Asch KV, Schoenmakers B
(2014) The Doctor’s New Clothes: Professional or Fashionable? Primary
Health Care 3: 145. doi:10.4172/2167-1079.1000145