In many fisheries, some component of the catch is usually released. Quantifying the
effects of capture and release on fish survival is critical for determining which practices are sustainable,
particularly for threatened species. Using a standardized fishing technique, we studied
sublethal (blood physiology and reflex impairment assessment) and lethal (post-release mortality
with satellite tags) outcomes of fishing stress on 5 species of coastal sharks (great hammerhead,
bull, blacktip, lemon, and tiger). Species-specific differences were detected in whole blood
lactate, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and pH values, with lactate emerging as the sole
parameter to be significantly affected by increasing hooking duration and shark size. Species-specific
differences in reflex impairment were also found; however, we did not detect any significant
relationships between reflex impairment and hooking duration. Taken together, we ranked each
species according to degree of stress response, from most to least disturbed, as follows: hammerhead
shark > blacktip shark > bull shark > lemon shark > tiger shark. Satellite tagging data
revealed that nearly 100% of all tracked tiger sharks reported for at least 4 wk after release, which
was significantly higher than bull (74.1%) and great hammerhead (53.6%) sharks. We discuss
which mechanisms may lead to species-specific differences in sensitivity to fishing and suggest
that observed variation in responses may be influenced by ecological and evolutionary phenomena.
Moreover, our results show that certain species (i.e. hammerhead sharks in this study) are
inherently vulnerable to capture stress and mortality resulting from fisheries interactions and
should receive additional attention in future conservation strategies.