ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

We explore the nature of knowledge and education and how Islamic traditions have shaped understanding of these matters. We contrast this with contemporary images of "Taliban-like" schools full of rote repetition and harsh, authoritarian literalism. Some of the history of Islamic scholarship venerates a much more generous relationship to knowing. We link these explorations to a recently published children's picture book, a true story about a librarian in Basra, Iraq, during the recent American invasion. Even if it is a "true story," we consider what its truth is and whether educators might or should or could stand by this truth. /// Nous explorons ici la nature du savoir et de l'éducation et comment la tradition islamique a modelé leur compréhension. Nous comparons les images contemporaines des écoles "style Taliban" qui sont faites de "par coeur" et de litéralité dure et autoritaire avec certaines écoles dans l'histoire de l'Islam qui affichent une plus grande générosité face au savoir. Nous établissons un lien entre ces notions et un livre illustré pour enfants récemment publié, une histoire vécue d'un libraire de Basra, en Iraq, pendant la récente invasion américaine. Même si cette histoire est une "histoire vraie", nous considérons sa valeur et nous pensons que les éducateurs pourraient accepter cette vérité ou même qu'ils devraient l'accepter.
CANADIANJOURNALOFEDUCATION31,3(2008):639666
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES:
THOUGHTSONTHELIBRARIANOFBASRA
DavidJardine&RahatNaqvi
UniversityofCalgary
WeexplorethenatureofknowledgeandeducationandhowIslamictraditionshave
shapedunderstandingofthesematters.Wecontrastthiswithcontemporaryimages
of“Talibanlike”schoolsfullofroterepetitionandharsh,authoritarianliteralism.
SomeofthehistoryofIslamicscholarshipveneratesamuchmoregenerous
relationshiptoknowing.Welinktheseexplorationstoarecentlypublishedchildren’s
picturebook,atruestoryaboutalibrarianinBasra,Iraq,duringtherecentAmerican
invasion.Evenifitisa“truestory,”weconsiderwhatitstruthisandwhether
educators,mightorshouldorcouldstandbythistruth.
Keywords:Islamicphilosophy,curriculumknowledge,knowledgeformation,
politicsandeducation,multiculturalism
Nousexploronsicilanaturedusavoiretdelʹéducationetcommentlatradition
islamiqueamodeléleurcompréhension.Nouscomparonslesimagescontemporaines
desécolesʺstyleTalibanʺ quisontfaitesdeʺparcoeurʺ etdelitéralitédureet
autoritaireaveccertainesécolesdanslʹhistoiredelʹIslamquiaffichent uneplus
grandegénérositéfaceausavoir.Nousétablissonsunlienentrecesnotionsetunlivre
illustrépourenfantsrécemmentpublié,unehistoirevécuedʹunlibrairedeBasra,en
Iraq,pendantlarécenteinvasionaméricaine.Mêmesicettehistoireestuneʺhistoire
vraieʺ, nousconsidéronssavaleuretnouspensonsqueleséducateurspourraient
acceptercettevéritéoumêmequʹilsdevraientlʹaccepter.
Motsclés:philosophiedelʹIslam, laconnaissanceducurriculum,laformationdu
savoir,lʹéducationetlespolitiques,lemulticulturalisme
__________________________
640   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
“IntheKoran,thefirstthingGodsaidtoMuhammadwas‘Read.’”
AliaMuhammadBaker,fromtheNewYorkTimes,July27,2003
I
Thepassagecitedaboveformsthefrontispiecetoawonderfulnew
children’spicturebookwrittenandillustratedbyJeanetteWinter(2005)
entitledTheLibrarianofBasra:ATrueStoryfromIraq.Attheearlyoutsetof
theAmericaninvasionofIraq,thelibrarianinquestion,Alia
MuhammadBaker,tookituponherselftoprotectthe30,000booksinthe
libraryinBasra,Iraq,whereshehadworkedfor14years.Thelibrary
hadbeen“ameetingplaceforallwholovebooks”(p.2),butnow,the
onlytalkwasnotofbooksbutofimpendingwar:“Aliaworriesthatthe
firesofwarwilldestroythebooks,whicharemoreprecioustoherthan
mountainsofgold...booksineverylanguage,newbooks,ancient
books,evenabiographyofMuhammadthatissevenhundredyearsold”
(p.3).Afterbeingrefusedofficialpermissiontoact,shebegansecretly
puttingbooksintohercarandtakingthem,firsttoanearbyrestaurant
belongingtoherfriendAnis,andthen,eventually,afterthelibrarywas
burnedtotheground,toherhomeandthehomesofherfriends.
Atfirstblush,itisdifficulttoavoidparallelsthoughtsofHypatia(c.
350415CE)andherfailedattempttoprotecttheLibraryofAlexandria
fromruin(seeSmith,2006b).TheruinoftheAlexandrianlibraryisoften
citedasoneoftheinitiatinggesturesofwhatlaterbecameknownasthe
“DarkAges”(Humphreys,2004).JeanetteWinter’sseeminglysimpletale
thusinvolvesprofoundquestionsandimagesregardingthenatureof
knowledgeanditssafekeeping.Itevokesthoughtsoftheravagesofwar
notonlyregardingthematerialityandfleshofourlives,butalso
regardingthefragilityofknowledgeitselfandhowoftenithasbeenboth
theideologicalmotiveandinnocentvictimofembattlementandwar.
Whateducatorshavewiththissimplechildren’sbookisanimageof
takingcareofknowledgeindifficultanddarktimes,ourtime,thistime,
underthecurrentshadowofwarconsciousness(Jardine,2006;seealso
Jardine,2004,2005,2006a;Smith,2003,2006,2006a,inpress;Gray,2001,
2003).
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 641
II
[I]toccurredtometolookintomycopyofSt.Augustine’sConfessions....whereIfirst
fixedmyeyesitwaswritten:ʺAndmengoabouttowonderattheheightsofthe
mountains,andthemightywavesofthesea,andthewidesweepofrivers,andthecircuit
oftheocean,andtherevolutionofthestars,butthemselvestheyconsidernot.ʺ
Petrarch(13041347),fromTheAscentofMountVentoux,aLettertoDionisiodaBorgo
SanSepolcro,Malaucene,April26.(Halsall,2006)http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/
source/petrarchventoux.html
“TheDarkAges,”atermfirstcoinedbyFrancescoPetrarca(L.Petrarch,
13041374)around1330CE,describestheperiodbetweenroughly476
1000CE.Duringthisperiod,intellectualpursuitandthegreatwisdoms
ofancientGreeceandRomewerelost,sometimesdeliberatelyand
systematically,toChristianEuropeanconsciousness.
Petrarchrevived,afteralapseof1,000years,recognitionthatapoetand
intellectualwasanimportantmemberofsociety.Petrarchhadperhapshismost
enduringinfluencebyhisreinitiationofhumanisticstudies.Travelingwidelyas
anambassadorandcelebrity,hecollectedmanuscriptsthatledtotherecoveryof
knowledgefromwritersofRomeandGreece.(http://www.humanistictexts.
org/petrarch.htm)
Petrarchwroteoffeelingsurroundedbydarknessanddensegloomʺ
(citedinMommsen,1942,p.233,emphasisinoriginal).Hisgreatefforts
initiatedarevivalofknowledgefromundertheseveritiesofliteralism,
Churchoppression,andsimpleneglect.Anditwasnotjustknowledge
thatdimmed.
Theseventhcentury[inparticular]isjustifiablyregardedasa“darkage.”Inall
partsoftheMediterranean,economicdeclineaccompaniedpoliticalinstability.
Levelsofcultureandstandardsofliteracyfellaspeopleceasedtolearn,build,
paint,andwriteinthetraditionalfashion.(Herrin,1987,p.133)
Asthesepassagessuggest,however,“DarkAges”isclearly
geographicallylocatedanda(debatably)appropriatedescriptionofa
darktime.WemustaskofthepassagecitedaboveregardingPetrarch’s
accomplishments:Fromwhomdidhecollectsuchmanuscriptsand
preciselyuponwhomhadsuchaDarkAgefallen?Therearetalesof
642   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
bothIslamicandChristianwarriorswho,whenpassingtheIslamic
librariesofNorthernAfricaandSouthernSpain,declared,invariousyet
similarways,thatifthelibrarycontainedknowledgethatwasidentical
with“TheBook”(theQu’ran/TheBible),thenitscontentswere
redundant,andifitcontainedknowledgethatwasdifferent,itscontents
wereheretical.Ineithercase,burningdownalibrarymadeperfectsense
onceknowledgewasconstrictedinsuchafashion.Thisisaterrible
kinshipthattwoseemingly“different”traditionsshare.Asacolleagueof
ours,MatthewZachariah,oncenoted,thefundamentalistsacross
differenttraditionshavemoreincommonwitheachotherthantheydo
withmoderatesintheirowntradition(seeNaqvi&Jardine,inpress).
Asanaside,wecannothelpbutindicatehow,inNorthAmerica,
educationalscholarshipitselfisinastateofembattleddarkness.In
springof2002,forexample,leadersoftheBushDepartmentof
Educationissuedorderstodeletematerialfromthethirtyyearold
EducationalResourcesInformationCenter(ERIC)databasethatdoesn’t
supportthegeneralphilosophyofNCLB[NoChildLeftBehind].Every
assistantsecretaryofeducationwasdirectedtoformagroupof
departmentalemployeeswithaleastonepersonwho“understandsthe
policyandprioritiesoftheadministration”toscrubtheERICwebsite.
Suchactionrunscountertotheoriginalintentofthewebsiteestablished
in1993toconstructapermanentrecordofeducationalresearchfor
students,teachers,citizens,educationalresearchers,andotherscholars.
Concurrently,thedeletionofsuchinformationraisesthestakesofright
wingknowledgepoliticstoanewlevel,becauseindividualswillonly
haveaccesstopublicdatathatsupportsparticularideologicalagendas
(Kincheloe,2006,p.41).
TheparallelsbetweenthedestructionoftheBasraLibraryandthe
purgingofeducationalresearchinAmericapost9/11shouldgive
educatorspause.Givensuchactions,thedarknessofthecurrentage
needscarefulthoughtandconsideration.
III
AdmittedlythislovingandprotectingofknowledgeoftheLibrarianof
BasraduringrecenttroublesinIraq,andwhatthishastosaytoscholars
andteachersineducationabouttheirworkallofthisdoesn’texactlyfit
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 643
withthepopular,televisedimageofIslamiceducationthatisafootin
thesepost9/11times.Wedonotgetmuchinthewayofthegreat
pleasuresandfreedoms,thedeepobligationsandresponsibilities,ora
senseofintellectualancestrythatcomesfromthevenerationandpursuit
ofknowledge.CurrentimagesaremuchmorecentredaroundTaliban
likeschoolsfullofobedient,roterepetitionand,asisoftenthe(not
whollyoralwaysgroundless)accusation,mindnumbingindoctrination
thatsometimesgoesasfarasnotonlydiscouragingquestioningand
thoughtfulnessandmeditation,butinfactdisparagingsuchthingsand
demonizingthem.Weareinundatedwithimagesofrepressive
authoritarianism,violence,intolerance,andhatred,whereinknowledge
itselfhasbecomeendangeredonbothsidesofthe“forusoragainstus”
ledger.Afterall,socalledtraditionalWesternschoolslikeFoundations
fortheFutureinCalgaryprovideteacherswithunalterablescriptsand
childrenwithnovoiceofdissentordisruptionordifference.Insuch
schools,theflourishingofdifferenceisaproblemtobefixed.
TheLibrarianofBasrathusbeginstoappearaslittlemorethana
quaintandunrulyexceptiontotherule.
Oncethisimage‐andmedia‐andprejudicedrivensituationisadded
towhatDavidG.Smith(2003)hasdescribedasthesystematic
“enfraudening”and“veiledinnuendos”(p.489)[alovelyandterrifying
choiceofterms(seeJardine,Clifford,&Friesen,inpress;Naqvi&
Jardine,inpress)]thatarerifeinAmericanforeignpolicy,wemight
evengoasfarastolamentthat“knowledgebecomes,asJohnMcMurtry
[1998]describesit,‘anabsurdexpression’(p.192)”(Smith,2003,p.489).
Oncewehearthat,in2003,48percentofAmericansbelievedthat
SaddamHusseinwas“personallyinvolved”inthe9/11attacks
(Feldman,2003)andthatnotuntilMarchof2006didaveryslim
majorityofAmericansbelievethatweaponsofmassdestructionwere
indeednotfoundinIraq(Teixeira,2006),knowledgeandabsurdityand
deliberateenfraudeningstarttogrotesquelyintertwine.And,asSmith
(2003)goesontosay,insuchanendarkenedmilieu,theverytaskof
educationitselfbecomesjeopardized:“Whenthelinesbetween
knowledgeandmisrepresentationbecomecompletelyblurredinthe
publicmind,theneducationasapracticeofcivicresponsibilitybecomes
verydifficult”(p.489).
644   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
Allthis,ofcourse,isnothingespeciallynewnor,asSmithsuggests,
aretheseissuesespeciallyIslamicintheirmanifestation.Itmakessome
terriblesensethat,intimesofthreat,imaginativenessandexploration
andintellectualpursuitsgiveway,inagreatparanoidrush,tothetried
andtrue,toeffortsoffixedandensuringandsurveillanceandthelike.
AsIvanIllich(1992)hassuggested,warmakesculturesmorealikein
thesematters(we’veseenhowbothsideshavemarshaledtheirmost
paranoidandunforgivingandunresponsivefacesinthecurrentconflicts
intheMiddleEast)whereasintimesofpeace,differencesand
multiplicityandintellectualvigorousnessandimaginationareableto
flourish.
ThisisanotherreasonthatthistaleoftheLibrarianofBasraisso
telling.Wehavethischildren’spicturebook(withpartofitsproceeds,
incidentally,beingdonatedtoafund,administeredbytheAmerican
LibraryAssociation,tohelprebuildBasra’sCentralLibrary),withAlia
andherfriendsloadinguphercartoprotectthelibrary’sbooksto
protecttheflourishingofknowledgeinatimeofgreatimpending
darkness.Onemighteventhinkofthistruestoryallegorically,asfullof
imagesoftakingknowledgetoheart,takingknowledgetohearthand
home,makingaplaceforitwhereitcanbenurturedandprotectedand
allowedtoflourish:Aplacewhereitcanbe“leftinpeace”(Illich,1992,
p.16)andwhereinwecanfindcomfort(commonfortitudeorstrength)
initscultivation.
IV
Anotherformofdarknesscancomeoverthefaceofknowledgethatis
notbornofembattlementbut,inasense,outoftheopposite.Whena
cultureis“leftinpeace”andbecomesfamiliaranddominant,itcanoften
losefromexplicitmemoryandarticulationthecharacterandancestry
andbloodlinesofthatfamiliarity.Whatwedobecomessimplyobvious,
andwhenour“doings”areinterrupted,wedon’tnecessarilyfeelenticed
toselfknowledge.AsanimmigranttoCanada,I(R.N.)canattestto
meetinglooksofbewildermentoraggravationatsuchmoments.We
bothwonder,then,aboutPresidentGeorgeW.Bush’s(andhisfather’s)
admonishment,inthefaceofinternationalquestioning,how“the
Americanwayoflifeisnotupfornegotiation”(Rasmussen,2003),and
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 645
howithascometomeanthat,inmanyquarters,itisnotupfor
examinationandthinkingatall.Asadominantforceintheworld,we
havewitnessedhowoftenattemptingtothinkabouttheeventsof9/11is
takentobenothingmorethanunthinkableactsoffailedpatriotism.
Thismakesthepracticeofteachingratherbewildering.Teachers
whostrivetocultivateknowledgeinthemselvesandintheirstudents
aresurrounded,itseems,bydeepandsilentviolationofthisproject.
Howcananyteacherteachinthenameofdemocraticpedagogy,whenthenew
politicsisimbricatedinexactlytheoppositedirection?Ifunilateralismand
monologicaldecisionmakingmarkthecharacterofpoliticalleadership,what
becomes,forteachersandstudents,oftherelationshipbetweenthoughtand
action,ofmybeliefasateacherthatindeed,whatIandothersmayplanfor
tomorrowmaybearanexpectationofbeingbroughtintoeffect?Ifbullying,both
domesticallyandinternationally,islegitimizedpublicly(albeiteuphemistically),
howcanI,asateacher,councilmystudentsagainstwhathasbecomeoneofthe
greatestscourgesinthecontemporaryschoolyard?Iflying,duplicityand
deliberatemisrepresentationareacceptablestrategiesbywhichtooperateinthe
nameofTruth,whatisthebasisuponwhichanyhumanrelationsmaybe
trusted?Iftheacademicfieldsofchilddevelopmentandchildpsychologycanbe
legitimatelycooptedforcommercialcontrolofthemindsoftheyoung,what
becomesofintellectuallibertyateventheearlieststagesofnewlife,tosay
nothingoftheproblemofchildrenlearningearlythatexploitingothersfor
personalgainis‘thewaytogo’?(Smith,2003,pp.488489)
Anotherequallydisturbingandperniciousmanifestationofthis
dimmingofknowledgeisnotsimplytheoutcomeofdeliberate
suppressionordeceit.HansGeorgGadamer(1989)hintsatthis
phenomenon(itismeanttorefertoadimmingofknowledgethatisnot
simplytheoutcomeofdeliberatedeceit)whendescribingtheworkof
theartist.Belongingtoatraditioninnowaynecessitatesunderstanding
thattraditionandtheconditions,nature,history,andlimitsofthat
belonging.
Theartist...standsinthesametraditionasthepublicthatheisaddressingand
whichhegathersaroundhim.Inthissenseitistruethatasanindividual,a
thinkingconsciousness,hedoesnotneedtoknowexplicitlywhatheisdoingand
whathisworksays.(p.133)
646   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
Likewise,underconditionsof(pre)dominance,takenforgranted
images,understandings,ideas,andpracticesbecomesimplyobvious
andsuchobviousnessneednotgiveanaccountofitselftothosewho
standinthesametraditionortothoseemigratingintothatdominant
tradition.Tothosewithinatradition,“itgoeswithoutsaying”and“itis
beyondquestion”aresignsofsuchbelonging.Insuchinstances,what
appearstosomeonenotfullyathomeinthisdominantcultureisahard,
notespeciallyknowledgeable,surfaceof“givenness”thatnolonger
seemstetheredtoanyroots,ancestries,orbloodlines,andnolonger
brooksanyquestionofhowsuchmatterscametobegiven.
TheabovepassagefromGadamerʹsTruthandMethodregardingthe
artistandhisorherworksspeaksalsotoamoredifficulttruth,
especiallywhenweconsidertheburgeoningmulticulturalfaceof
Canadianculture.Belongingtoacultureanditsformsoflanguageand
formsoflife(Wittgenstein,1968)bynomeansentailsthatoneneedsto
understandthesemattersorbeabletoarticulatetheirnatureandorigins.
Belongingandunderstandingthatbelongingarenotidentical.Buthere
istherub.IfoneentersCanadaaspartofaminority,oneisbeing
constantlycalledupontounderstandandarticulateone’scultureof
originwhileatthesametimefacingaprofoundinarticulatenessfromthe
predominantcultureintowhichonehasemigrated.Inotherwords,a
predominantcultureisrarelyrequiredtogiveanaccountofitselfwhile,
atthesametime,requiringanaccountofthosewhoareotherwise.Only
whentheconditionofbelongingissomehowinterrupted,onlywhenthe
everydayfamiliarityofbelongingbecomesstrangeandestranged,are
wecalledupontothinkaboutthatbelonginganditscharacter.
V
“MumlookwhatIgotforyoufromschool.”saidmy(R.N.)7yearold
daughter,assheenteredthehouseexcitedly.Sheshovedanovalobjectintomy
handasshespoke.Iprobablylookedalittlelostandsheadded,impatiently:
“Mumit’sanEasterEgg.”
Asshemovedaroundthehouseexcitedlyhumminganunfamiliartune,I
staredatthisobjectonmykitchencounterthatnowhadaname.Underthe
fadingtwilightthebrightblueandpinkontheeggshone,staringbackatme.At
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 647
thatinstanceIamnotquitesurewhathappenedbutwhateveritwasprompted
metoexplorethepremisesofthistensionthatIwasexperiencingasan
immigrantparent.
Thiswasbynomeansthefirstorfinalinstanceofsuchstrangeness
arrivinginmydaughter’slife,arrivingasitdidwithasenseofassured
familiarityandnormality.Onanotheroccasion,whenIwenttopickupmy
youngerdaughterfrompreschoolaroundthesametimeasthearrivalofMaria’s
egg,herteacherarrivedatthedoorwearingrabbitears.
Likesomanyothers,IimmigratedtoCanadawithmyhusbandalmost10
yearsago.WehavetwochildrenbothborninCanada.AsMuslimslivingin
Canadaweareconstantlynegotiatingquestionsofidentity.Whoareweinthe
midstofallthisdiversityandmorethanthatwhoareourchildrenandwhat
theywillbecomeinwhatJudithButler(2004)hascalled“precarioustimes.”
“Precarious”“thepositionofbeingheldthroughthefavorofanother”(Online
EtymologyDictionary[OED]).(seeNaqvi&Prasow,2007).
Asanimmigrantattemptingtoenterintothelifeofadominantculture
otherthanmyown,myfamilyandIfaceaninterestingreality.Withbunny
ears,andpinksandbluesandyellows,(justliketheredsandgreensandtrees
andlightsaroundDecember),suchmattersaresofamiliartothosewhobelong
tosuchfamilialnessthatarticulationisnotsimplyunnecessary.Askingforan
articulationispreciselyasignof“notbelonging.”Infact,suchaskingisoften
greetedwith“Whodoyouthinkyouare?”andsometimeseven“Whydon’tyou
gobackhome?”Thesearegoodquestionseventhoughtheyweren’tmeanttobe.
“It’sEaster”or“Thisiswhatwedo”or“Youknow?Redandgreen?
Christmas?”arefullyadequateanswersfromwithintheconditionofbelonging,
andanimmigrantvoicefromoutsideofthatspheresoundsalmostinevitably
“outofplace.”Whodowethink“we”are?Wherepreciselyis“home”?
Itisclear,also,thatourfamilytraditionsthatstretchoutacrossIndia,Iran,
Afghanistan,andSaudiArabia,andthecomplexstoriesaboutourfamily
lineageandourMuslimheritagearethemselvesintimatelyfamiliartous.There
islittledoubtthatifthisteacherwiththebunnyears,ortheonewhosenthome
theEasteregg,movedtoourcountriesoforigin,they,too,aspeopleotherwise
tosuchplaces,wouldrunintopreciselythesameincredulousness,thesame
silent,strange,andestranging,takenforgrantedpractices.Wethussharean
ephemeralkinship.
Ididn’taskherabouttherabbitears.Shemayhavewelcomedsucha
648   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
questionwithopenarms.Shemayhavehadmuchtosayaboutsuchmatters,
muchknowledgetoimpart,manyquestionstoask.Thisisthemostdifficultof
placestoinhabit:shallImoveoutwardstowardsaskingandengagingandrisk
thebewilderedstares?OrshouldIjustforgofornow?Pileupknowledgeandits
pursuitawayfromsitesofpossibleembattlement?ShouldI,thistime,pullback
intoreserveandsilence?
Feelingsofseparationandlossandestrangementareinevitable.Andsome
ofthissenseofseparationoccurs,ofcourse,betweengenerationsbetween
parentswhovisitherefromPakistanandourselves,betweenusandour
children,andsoon.Hereistheduplicitythatcomesfrombeinganimmigrant.
Bytheverynatureofitspopulationmakeup,immigrantstoCanadahaveto
embodymanyculturesfromthemomenttheysettlewithinitsborders.Aperson
likemyselfofAsiandescentisalreadymulticulturalofnecessitywhenheorshe
arrivesinCanada.Thisisprecariousbecauseone’sowncultureremainsthe
cultureofone’sorigin,eventhough,withmeandmyhusbandandourtwo
children,ourowncultureisCanada.
WhiteAngloSaxoncultureinNorthAmericaseemspremisedona
strangeandsilentdistancefromitsownancestralroots.Itseemsthatthe
strangestandmostestrangedthinginCanadaisn’t,forexample,Islamor
Pakistan,butthosesilentyetpredominantthingsthat“gowithoutsaying.”
VI
My(D.J.)mother,whoseculturalbackgroundis,throughherfather,
FrenchCanadian(Terriault)backtoabout1640inQuebec,and
Norwegian(Hendrickson)throughhermother,alwayscalledherself
EnglishbecauseshespokeEnglish.Herfather’sfamily(under,Isuspect,
losttrackofreligiousandculturalpressures),Anglicizedtheirnameto
“Terrio”around1850(onlytheboysnameswerethuschangedbecause
thegirlswould,iftheymarried,losetheFrenchname).Itwasfurther
Anglicizedbymygrandfather,Gardner,to“Terrie”whenthefamily
movedfromJoggins,NovaScotia,toToronto,inabout1925,where
“Terrio”madefolksthinktheymightbeItalian.
Mybrother’sfirstnameisTerry.Nooneinmyfamilyeverspokeof
theseerasuresofmemory.Thatis,theseerasures,forthemostpart,
succeeded.
VII
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 649
Inhisarticleʺʹ...thefarthestWestisbutthefarthestEastʹ:TheLong
WayofOriental/OccidentalEngagement,ʺ DavidG.Smith(2006b)
demonstrateshowtheentrenchmentofEastandWestintoseparateand
separablydefinabletraditionsisanillusion,andadangerousoneatthat.
Intimesofembattlement,suchentrenchmentinto“usandthem”
whereinourinterrelatednessseemstobe“revocableandprovisional”
(Gray,2001,pp.3536),mightmakeaterriblesortofsense.However,as
Gadamer(1989)suggests,“onlyinthemultifariousnessofvoices”(p.
284)doesanytraditionexist.Itispreciselythissituationof“mutuality”
(Smith,2006b;seealsoClarke,1997foranexplorationofhowAsian
traditionsenteredintoEuropeanimaginationregardingthe
Enlightenment)withinwhichbothEastandWestarewhattheyhave
becomeonlybecauseoftheother.Itisnotsimplythatwithoutthosewho
areotherwise,wemightneverhaveoccasiontothinkaboutourown
familiarbelonging.Rather,thatveryfamiliarbelonginghasbecome
whatitisbecauseofitsoftenlonglostmutualitywiththosewhoseem
simply“other.”
“TheDarkAges”isbutonetimelyexampleofsuchmutuality.What
was,forPetrarch,agreatDarkAgewas,forIslam,anageofintellectual
flourishing.
Bythe10thcentury,Cordobahad700mosques,60,000palaces,and70libraries,
thelargestofwhichhad600,000books,whileasmanyas60,000treatises,poems,
polemicsandcompilationswerepublishedeachyearinalAndalus.Thelibrary
ofCairohadmorethan100,000books,whilethelibraryofTripoliissaidtohave
hadasmanyasthreemillionbooks,beforeitwasburntduringtheCrusades.The
numberofimportantandoriginalArabicworksonsciencethathavesurvivedis
muchlargerthanthecombinedtotalofGreekandLatinworksonscience.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age)
Petrarch’srecoveryofancienttextsofRomeandGreecewasabetted
byaflourishingIslamicintellectualtradition.AswiththeLibrarianof
Basra,awholearrayofscholarstookgoodcareof“thebooks”inatime
whenEuropefellintodarknessandembattlement.
Itisimpossibletogiveafullaccountofsuchmattersinthepresent
context.Wereferreaders,asastartingpoint,tothewonderfulWebsite
IslamicPhilosophyOnline:PhilosophiaIslamica(http://www.
650   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
muslimphilosophy.com/),aswellastheonlineCatholicEncyclopedia
(http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/index.html)(andcountlessother
sourcesofinformation).Herewewillsimplythreadoutonesmalllineof
thoughtthathelpsusunderstandthislibrarianandherwork.Topreface
thisthreadweneed,first,torecallthattheworksofAristotlethat
underwrotemuchoflaterMiddleAgesEuropeanphilosophyand
theologywereaninheritanceindirectlyfromknowledgeprotectedby
andcommenteduponbyIslamicscholars.
AristotlewasunderstoodtobeaphilosopherwhobelongedmoretotheArab
thantheChristianworld.Runningagainstthegrainoftraditionandattheriskof
condemnation,Abelard,AlbertusMagnus,andThomasAquinasdrewupon
Aristotle’sthoughts.Indeed,Aristotle’swritingsonmetaphysicsandlogicwere
studiesinBaghdadwellbeforetheyweretranslatedintoLatininMuslimSpain;
then,fromToledo,theyarrivedinParisbytheendofthetwelfthcentury.
(Dussel,2000,p.466)
Parenthetically,here,HansGeorgGadamer(2007)musesuponthefact
that“itiscertainlynoaccidentthatinthepassageofAristotlethrough
Arabiccultureonefindsmanytracesofthatcultureechoingthroughour
language”(p.421).HespecificallynoteshowArabicnumeralsarrivedin
Europeandhowtheirarrivalmadepossibleanalgebrathatissimply
impossiblewithRomannumerals.Theworldofmathematicsthus
shiftedunderArabicinfluence.Gadamernotesaswell,regardingthe
translationofAristotlefromtheoriginalGreek,that“Noteverylanguage
isaslogicalasLatin.InLatin,thingsgetweaker,paler.Thewholefateof
Westerncivilizationisforeshadowedhere”(p.421).Thesetantalizingly
briefcommentsmadewhenGadamerwas96yearsoldopenapathfor
thinkingaboutthethreadsofinfluenceandinheritancethatcomefrom
oursharedIslamicpast.
AlFarabi(c.870950),knownas“theSecondMaster”following
Aristotle,wasoneofthefirsttoincorporateAristotle’sideaofemanation
intohiswork.Simplyput,thisideameansthattheworldcanbe
understoodasanemanation,apouringforth,a“gift,”onemightsay,of
God.Assuch,theworldholdsinitsmultifariousnessandcomplexities
signsofGod’shand;moreover,thehumanspiritisensouled;therefore
humanity,atitsbest,showssignsofGod’scharacter.Therefore(and
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 651
especiallyofinteresttoeducators)thetaskofcomingtoknowaboutthe
worldisitselfavenerabletaskandonetowhichitisworthyof
dedicatingone’slife(seeNetton,1998).Pursuingknowledgeofthe
worldisnotantagonistictofaithbutinfactawaytodeepenit.(Thisis
clearlyabynomeansnoncontentiouspositionwithinthehistoryof
IslamorChristianitywepoint,here,notonlytothefearandparanoia
offundamentalismregardingknowledge,butalsotothedangerous
hubristhatcancomewiththepursuitofknowledge,adanger
understoodandsharedbymanyreligioustraditions.)Inlightofthe
venerationofknowledgethatisalsocommonplaceinmostreligious
traditions,theLibrarianofBasraisnotdemonstratinginfidelityby
protectingthebooksbutratherfidelity.Inthislight,too(andequally
contentiously),thelivingdisciplinesthathavebeenentrustedtoteachers
andstudentsinschools,andhowwemighttakecareofthosedisciplines
evenintimeswhenknowledgeisembattled,becomefascinatinggiftsto
ponder.
OneofthegreatestfiguresinthislineofIslamicancientsisIbnSina
(L.Avicenna[9801037])whowasbornnearBukharainCentralAsia.
HerewehaveanothergenerationofthewisdomofancientGreek
philosophy.
[Avicenna]maintainsthatGod,theprincipleofallexistence,ispureintellect,
fromwhomotherexistingthingssuchasminds,bodiesandotherobjectsall
emanate,andthereforetowhomtheyareallnecessarilyrelated.Thatnecessity,
onceitisfullyunderstood,isrationalandallowsexistentstobeinferredfrom
eachotherand,ultimately,fromGod.(Kemal,2007)
AvicennaelucidatesthepossibilityofinferencefromGodandhisWord
toGodandhisworkstheenscreata,thatwhichGodcreatedandthis
inferenceofGodinhisworksonceagainennoblesthepursuitof
knowledgeofthecreatedworldaspartandparcelofaknowledgeand
venerationofGod.UnlikemanyIslamicandChristianfundamentalists,
whocleavesolelyto“TheBook”andwhothussetupastateof
embattlementbetweenworldlyknowledgeandfaith,thewholeofthe
world,inAvicenna’swork,issuchasacredtext.Avicenna’sworkon
science,logic,andmathematics,aswellashiscarefulcommentarieson
Aristotle,provedtobeamajorinfluenceonDunsScotus(12651308),
652   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
thusportendingawholebloodlineofChristianscholarship.
Finally,fornow,wehaveTheGreatCommentator,AbulWaleed
MuhammadIbnRushd(L.Averroes[11281198])whowasbornin
Cordova,Spain.Averroes’commentariesonAristotlewereacentral
influenceontheAngelicDoctor,ThomasAquinas(12251274);therefore,
hisworkhelpedtheologicallyfoundcontemporaryRomanCatholicism
(Zahoor,1997).OneneedsimplyglanceatthegrandbreathofSt.
Thomas’SummaTheologicaandthecascadesofdetailedscholarshipthat
followuponittounderstandhowIslamicscholarskeptthisprofound
knowledgesafe.FromAristotle,upthroughAverroes,toSt.Thomas,in
fact,educators,directlyorindirectly,inherittheveryideaof“disciplines
ofknowledge,”“subjectareas,”(seeThomas’s[1986]“divisionofthe
sciences”whichisitselfofAristotelianorigin)onemightsay,andthe
rationalefortheirorderandcharacter.Intheverymundanetyof
Alberta’sProgramofStudiesanditsorderlylayingoutofdisciplines
lurkoldandsilentfamiliars.Differentlyput,theAlbertaProgramof
Studiesis,forgoodandill,inpartanAristotelianandIslamic
inheritance.EvenwhenweheardinCalgaryhowtheBoardofEducation
hasrecentlybeenorganizedaroundthe“ends”ofeducation,this
teleologicaldiscourseis,inwaysthatareleftcompletelyindarkness,
AristotelianinoriginandIslamicinitsarticulation.
Wehavethreadedourwaythroughtheseauthors,nottoevenbegin
topretendtobeauthoritativeinsuchmatters,buttosimplydemonstrate
howmuchstumblingaroundinthedarknessweourselvesare
experiencinginwalkingtheseterrainsforthefirsttimeandfinding
ourselvessoprofoundlybereft.Itis,frankly,humiliatinginthatlovely
waythatisthewayofscholarship.Moreover,thisskirtingthrough
historyshowsagreatbiasthatpointstheknowledgeprotectedby
IslamicscholarsinrelationtoveryspecificandlimitedChristianand
EnlightenmentEuropeantraditionsthatweretocome.Onecansee,for
example,intheAbuHamidalGhazali(10581111)amoveawayfrom
thelogicandrhetoricandintellectualismofAristotelianismandits
emphasisonthestructureandformalitiesofknowledge,towardpoetry,
imagination,creativity,andreflection.AlGhazaliwasinterestedin
“activelyconsideringhowknowledgeismade,ratherthanviewingit
passively”(Moosa,2005,p.38).Moosagoesontocontendthat“Ibn
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 653
Rushd’s[Averroes’]”extremelynegativeandmocking“observations
[regardingalGhazali]...blissfullyskirted...theessenceofall
knowledge:invention.”(p.38).Mossanotes(p.38),however,thatthis
characterofalGhazali’sworklinkshimup,forexample,toGiambattista
Vico’s(16681744)laterworkonimaginationandsapientiapoetica(poetic
wisdom[seeVico,1984,BookTwo])asasourceforhowknowledgeis
actuallycreated,and,fromthisthread,throughtoHansGeorg
Gadamer’sdrawingonVico’sworkonimagesandmemoryinhis
formulationofphilosophicalhermeneutics(seeJardine,2006c).Even
here,wecanhearechoesofthesubdividesofartsandsciencesin
contemporaryschooling,andthoselongandheatedargumentsabout
“corecurriculum”andwhatitmeans.Wecanhearechoeshere,too,of
ourimagesofchildrenasactiveandinventivebeingswhomust“make”
somethingoftheirworldto“know”aboutit(aglossontheshallowsof
theeducationalpracticeofcontemporaryconstructivism).
Wecanhear,too,eveninthisemphasisbyalGhazalionthecreation
ofknowledge,echoesofAristotelianemanation.IntheimageofGod,
andbyanalogy,thecreativityofhumanknowledgereflectsGod’s
creativewill.Inourfrailandfiniteways,ofcourse,we,unlikeGod,
cannotcreateexnihilo.Ourinventivenessneedssomethingtobe
inventivewithaninventoryofmaterialtothinkandcreatewith
(inventionandinventoryaretwoetymologicaloffshootsoftheLatin
terminvenio).However,evenhere,ananalogy,alikeness,akinship,
persists.
Whatwas,forChristendomandEurope,aDarkAgeprovestobea
differentstoryincertainthreadsofIslamicintellectualancestry.Ina
wonderfullyparallelwaytothatsimplechildren’spicturebookby
JeannetteWinter,thesethreadsshowhowknowledgewasprotectedina
“DarkAge.”Similarly,TheLibrarianofBasraprovestobesomething
morethansimplyATrueStoryfromIraq.Itis,initsownway,areminder
ofsomethingnearlylosttomemoryandcertainlyendangeredin
contemporaryoversimplifiedandfrighteneddisparagementsofIslam
andthefullbreadthofitsways.
Itisareminder,too,ofsomethingfarmoresimpleandimmediate.
AristotelianandNeoPlatonictheoriesofemanationseemsodistant
fromtheeverydayworldofschoolandschooledknowledge.Butthis
654   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
hint,fromalGhazaliandfromhisconfrontationswithAverroes,isan
ancientplayingoutofthecontemporaryeducationalconversationsand
confrontationsbetweenknowledgeasstructuredandmethodological,
andknowledgeasapoeticandcreativeact.
Wefindsomeoftheselongandtangledthreadsregardingcreativityand
knowledgerightinthemidstofsomeworkthatMariadidatthelocalMosque
school(shewouldhavebeeninaroundGradeOneatthetimeinher“regular”
school).Shewasgivenaworksheettocolorinandlearnabout,andthiswork
becamethebasisoflongandongoingconversationsbetweenchildrenand
teachersandparents.ThesheetportraystheQu’ranatthetopofthepage,and,
inArabicscriptontherightside,andEnglishontheleft,theopenedpagessay:
“AndrecitetheQu’ranclearly,beautifully.”
Belowthisarepicturedthreeotherbooks,oneaboutanimals,anotherabout
birds,andathirdaboutflowers.Underwritingthisiswhatiscalleda“Do’a
[prayer]beforestudying.”ItisfirstwritteninArabicscript,thentransliterated
intoEnglish:
Allaahummainfa’niibimaaalamtaniiwa’alimniimaayanfa’unii.
Then,thereisanEnglishtranslationinwhichechoesofAverroesandAvicenna
canstillbeheard:“OAllah.makemeusefultothesocietywiththeknowledge
thatYouhavegrantedmeandgrantmetheknowledgethatisusefultome.”
AsIlookbackoverthepicture,theQu’ranispicturedsittingup,openona
standandthebottomofthesupportseemstoopenwide,almostshelteringor
housingthebookspicturedbelowit.Birds,animals,flowers.Agradeonechild’s
simplework,withtheQu’ranpicturedsomehow“emanating,”anembrace
descendingoutwardsintoworldlyknowledgeandaprayerregardingknowledge
andbeingofserviceandusetotheworldwiththegiftofsuchknowledge.When
D.J.cameovertomyhouselatelastyear,wehadtalkedabouttheQu’ranupon
topofmy(R.N.’s)refrigerator,openonastand,placeduphigh,abovethefrays
ofdailylifeandthefridgemagnetsthatpinnedMaria’sworksheetupforallto
see.
VIII
[Icarry]ageneralskepticismtowardallideaswhichareusedassourcesof
legitimacybythewinnersoftheworld.Ishouldliketobelievethatthetask...is
tomakegreaterdemandsonthosewhomouththecertitudesoftheirtimesand
areclosertothepowerfulandrich,thantothefaithsandideasofthepowerless
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 655
andmarginalized.Thatwayliesfreedom,compassionandjustice.(Nandy,1987,
p.123)
DuringtheinvasionofIraqin2003,reportscameoutofBaghdadof
theAmericanArmysettingupguardoutsideoftheheadofficesof
variousoilcompanybuildingstoprotectwhatwereeuphemistically
called“Americaninterests.”Atthesametime,reportsspreadthatthe
AmericanadministrationhadrefusedtobelievethewarningsthatIraq’s
culturalwealthwouldneedprotectionifthecityweretofall.
FromApril10to12,2003,duringthemayhemthatfollowedthecollapseof
SaddamHussein’sregime,lootersenteredtheIraqNationalMuseumin
Baghdad.Theystoleanddestroyedartifactsandcauseddamagetothemuseum.
...Seizingupontinybitsofavailableinformation,Westernarchaeologists
createdtheirownnarrativeofeventsandaggressivelypromoteditthroughthe
worldmedia.(Joffe,2004,Introductionsection,1)
AlthoughitistruethatAmericantroopsweredispatchedtoprotect
oilcompanybuildingsinBaghdad,anditisequallytruethattheywere
notdispatchedtoprotecttheNationalMuseum,itseemsthatthemain
thing“lostfromtheBaghdadmuseum:truth”(Aaronovitch,2003).
Itwasinitiallyreportedthatover170,000itemswerestolenor
destroyedandtheancientdepthofdespairsoundseerilyfamiliar.
ThelootingoftheIraqMuseum(Baghdad)isthemostseveresingleblowto
culturalheritageinmodernhistory,comparabletothesackofConstantinople,
theburningofthelibraryatAlexandria,theVandalandMogulinvasions,and
theravagesoftheconquistadors.(TheAmericanSchoolsofOrientalResearch,April
16,2003,citedinJoffe,2004,Introductionsection,Openingquotation)
Talbot(2003)claimsthattheitemsstolenweresospecificand
targetedthatthelooterscouldnothavebeensimplypeople“offthe
street”buthadtobewellinformedandselectiveagentswhohad
plannedaheadoftimeastrategicheist.“Nothingwasaccidentalabout
it.Rather,itwastheresultofalongplannedprojecttoplunderthe
artisticandhistoricaltreasuresthatareheldinthemuseum”(Talbot,
2003,p.1).TalbotgoesontotalkabouthowtheBritishpresshad
suggestedthat“theACCP[theAmericanCouncilforCulturalPolicy]
656   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
mayhaveinfluencedUSgovernmentpolicyonIraqiculturalartifacts”
(p.3).Hefurtherstates,“TheACCPwasformedin2001byagroupof
wealthyartcollectorstolobbyagainsttheCulturalProperty
ImplementationAct,whichattemptstoregulatetheartmarketandstop
theflowofstolengoodsintotheUS”(pp.3‐4).
Laterreportsattemptedtoquelltheseclaims.Farfeweritems
seemedtobemissing.Vaultswerediscoveredwhereitemshadbeen
storedpreciselybecauseoftheknowledgeofimpendingthreatsto
security(shadesofAlia’scartrunk).Talkcameof“insidejobs”(Joffe,
2004,NarrativeUnderminedsection,1)“theworkofnewlydeposed
Baathistofficials,whohadbeensellingof[f]ourpatrimonyastheysaw
theirdayswerenumbered.Astheregimefell,theseBaathistswentback
foronelastswindle”(Joffe,2004,NarrativeUnderminedsection,1,
citingMakiya,2003).Inthemidstofthisswirlofsuggestionand
accusation,DavidAaronovitch(2003)proposedthatwhatmightbeat
workhereisasimple(albeitperhapsunderstandable)political
presumption:“thesedaysyoucannotsayanythingtoobadaboutthe
Yanksandnotbebelieved”(p.4).
Wewillleavethisforayfornowwithatroublingreflection.The
workofteachersandscholarsinvolvesthinkingandseekingoutthe
truthofthingsandthisstatementseemsprofoundlyandirretrievably
naïveinthesepostmoderntimesofslipperysignificationandpolitical
andmediamanipulation.DavidSmith(2006)suggeststhateducators’
work,now,isoccurringin“aseasonofgreatuntruth”inwhich“the
truthofthings”issimplyamanipulableitemintheswayofpublic
opinion.Smith(inpress)speaksabouttheinfluenceofLeoStrausson
contemporaryneoconservativism,andhowneoconservativestook
fromPlatotheideaof“thenoblelie,”where“theuntruebecomestrueif
ithelpsyoumanage[theignorantmasses]better”(Jardine2006b,p.x)
(ofcourseandalways“fortheirowngood”[Miller,1990]).Thesemoves
ofneoconservativismdonotendupsuggestingthatthereissimplyno
truthwhatsoever.
ButStraussisnotanihilistifwemeanbythetermadenialthatthereisanytruth,
abeliefthateverythingisinterpretation.Hedoesnotdenythatthereisan
independentreality.Onthecontrary,hethinksthatindependentrealityconsists
innatureandits“orderofrank”thehighandthelow,thesuperiorandthe
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 657
inferior.LikeNietzsche,hebelievesthatthehistoryofwesterncivilisationhas
ledtothetriumphoftheinferior,therabblesomethingtheybothlamented
profoundly.(Postel&Drury,2003,np)
Thetracelinesaredeepandwide.PaulWolfowitzandothermembersof
andadvisorstotheBushadministrationareallstudentsofStrauss’s
work,andStrauss’sideasareacentralguidingconcerninthe
DepartmentofPoliticalScienceattheUniversityofCalgaryStephen
Harper’sAlmaMater(Smith,inpress).
Aseasonofgreatuntruth?Shouldwesuspectthatourbeliefsinand
hopefulnessaboutAliaMuhammedBakerʹseffortsaresimplyattractive
andconvincingshadowsonthecavewall?Havewebeenduped?Have
webeenmanipulatedintosomethinglaughablyridiculousthatvery
sortoflaughabilitythatunderwritestheantiintellectualismofthe
currentAmericanadministration?Havewebeenfedabookabouta
librarianinBasrathatsimplycharmsandspellbindsthosewhomight
venerateknowledgeintobelievingaconvincing,noblelie?
Evenifitisa“truestoryfromIraq,”whatitstruthisandwhether
we,aseducators,mightorshouldorcouldstandbysuchatruthallof
thisispartofwhatthissimplechildren’sbooknowasksofus.
IX
ManystupidandviolentthingshavebeendoneinthenameofAllah,
andinthisregard,IslamsharesaterriblekinshipwithitstwoAbrahamic
forebearers.Admittingthiskinshipcanprovideacertainrelief.
ThatiswhyitwasespeciallydisingenuousofBenedictXVInotto
admittotheviolenceandstupiditiesperpetratedinthenameofthe
RomanCatholicChurchinwhatturnedouttobeanincendiaryspeech
givenonTuesday,September12,2006.Themediaversionofthisspeech
“Faith,ReasonandtheUniversity:MemoriesandReflections”
(BenedictXVI,2006)focusedonhowtheHolyFatherhademphasized
that,asheputit,“forMuslimteaching,Godisabsolutelytranscendent.
Hiswillisnotboundupwithanyofourcategories,eventhatof
rationality....Godisnotevenboundbyhisownword”4).Benedict
citesaneditionofdialogueseditedbyTheodoreKhouryofMunster,in
which,“perhapsin1391inthewinterbarracksnearAnkara”2)the
ByzantineEmperorManuelIIPaleologuswasarguingoverthetopicof
658   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
“holywar”with“aneducatedPersian”2).IfGodiswholly
transcendenttotheworldandtohumancategories,thenthereisnothing
inhumanaffairsthatwouldprevent,curb,ordiscourageviolencebeing
perpetratedinthenameofthefaith.Wearenotcalledupontobe
generousorreasonablebecauseofsomeanalogytoGod.ManuelII
argued,“nottoactinaccordancewithreasoniscontrarytoGod’s
nature”4)butitseemsthathisPersianinterlocutordisagreed.As
Manuelcontinuesinthislineofargument,thecitedtextthatcaused
BenedictXVIsomuchgriefemerges.ManuelIIsaystohisguest:“Show
mejustwhatMohammedbroughtthatwasnew,andthereyouwillfind
thingsonlyevilandinhuman,suchashiscommandtospreadbythe
swordthefaithhepreached”3).
Wewillleave,fornow,thealmostoverwhelmingurgetospeak
abouthowChristianity’sskillswiththeswordarethemselvesquite
practiced,letalonetheviolenceofafaiththatcreatedandperpetuated
residentialschools,again,forthegoodofgodlessIndians.Fornow,we
arefascinatedbypreciselywhoitisthatPopeBenedictXVIchosetocite
inthehistoryofIslamicthoughtnotalGhazali,notalFarabiorIbn
SinaorIbnRushd,butIbnHazm.
IbnHazm(9941064CE),morefullyAbuMuhammadʹAliibn
AhmadibnSa`idibnHazm,wasborninCordovainSouthernSpain.He
grewupinatimeofdifficultandviolentethnicandclanrivalriesand
war.Hisworkthusbetraysasenseofretrenchmentandembattlement.
UnlikealGhazali,alFarabi,IbnSina,orIbnRushd(who,ofcourse,
PopeBenedictXVI,asascholarandintellectual,knowsfullwell),inIbn
Hazm’swork,thekinshipbetweenGodandhiscreationhasbeen
severed.GodiswhollyTranscendent.Therefore,allwehavetogoonis
theliteralwordsoftheQu’ran.
[IbnHazm]arguesthatpeopleareboundtoobeyonlythelawofGod,initszahir
orliteralsense,withoutrestrictions,additions,ormodifications.Hetakesthe
positionthatlanguageitselfprovidesallthatisnecessaryfortheunderstanding
ofitscontentandthat,therefore,God,whorevealedtheQuʹraninclear(mubin)
Arabic,hasusedthelanguagetosaypreciselywhathemeans.Fromthis
position,itfollowsthatIbnHazmstronglycriticizestheuseofreasoningby
analogy(qiyas).IbnHazmdoesnotdenyrecoursetoreason,sincetheQuʹran
itselfinvitesreflection,butthisreflectionmustbelimited.Reasonisnotafaculty
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 659
forindependentresearch,muchlessfordiscovery.Bysubmittinghumans
exclusivelytothewordofGod,IbnHazmʹsliteralismfreesthemfromanychoice
oftheirown.(Arnaldez,2006)
RogerArnaldez(2006)suggeststhatIbnHazm’sworkconstitutesoneof
the“mostoriginalandimportantmonumentsofMuslimthought”(np).
PopeBenedictXVIcommentsindirectlyonthisoriginality.Ithastodo,
accordingtoBenedictXVI,withtheerasureofHellenic/Greekthought
fromthreadsofIslamicthought,erasure,therefore,ofanysignsof
AristotelianorNeoPlatonicemanationandthereforeofanysenseofan
analogicalintimacybetweenGodandhiscreation.Thusevacuatedfrom
theworld,theonlyrecoursetoknowledgeisliteraltheletterofthe
Book.Reasoningandthoughtfulnessthusgiveway,inthecontemporary
imagination,toTalibanlikeroterepetitionoftheletter,andincitements
toviolenceagainstthosewhodonotfollowthatlettercommon
incitementsinallformsoffundamentalism.(Hereisonemoresource,
too,oftheantiintellectualismthatsometimesinfects,ofallthings,
educationitself).
DespitetheclumsinesswithwhichBenedictXVIfumbledthese
matters,theworkofIbnHazmisnotwithoutimportance.ThoseMoslem
andChristianwarriorswhoburnedlibrariesthatcontainedanythingbut
“TheBook”haveIbnHazmasanancestor.WewillleaveittotheHoly
FathertoconsiderwhencesuchanideainChristianityoccurs(hisspeech
doesbegintoopenupsomeavenuesinthisregard).
Laterinthisspeech,PopeBenedictXVI(2006)goesontodiscussthe
issueofthedeHellenizationofChristianityinawaythatfurtherbetrays
preciselyhowoddandselectivewashischoiceofIbnHazmalonetocite
undertheblanketof“Muslimteaching.”
[I]tisoftensaidnowadaysthatthesynthesiswithHellenismachievedinthe
earlyChurchwasapreliminaryenculturationwhichoughtnottobebindingon
othercultures.Thelatteraresaidtohavetherighttoreturntothesimple
messageoftheNewTestamentpriortothatenculturation,inorderto
enculturateitanewintheirownparticularmileux.Thisthesisisnotonlyfalse;it
iscoarseandlackinginprecision.TheNewTestamentwaswritteninGreekand
bearstheimprintoftheGreekspirit.Thefundamentaldecisionsmadeaboutthe
660   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
relationshipbetweenfaithandtheuseofhumanreasonarepartofthefaith
itself;theyaredevelopmentsconsonantwiththenatureoffaithitself.14)
AlthoughourthoughtsreturntotheLibrarianofBasra,theHolyFather’s
finalincitementsareimportant.
[L]isteningtothegreatexperiencesandinsightsofthereligioustraditionsof
humanity,andthoseoftheChristianfaithinparticular,isasourceofknowledge,
andtoignoreitwouldbeanunacceptablerestrictionofourlisteningand
responding.16)
Indeed.Wouldthathehadbeenmorecarefulinlayingoutakinshipof
“listeningandresponding”betweenIslamandChristianity.This
statementwouldnotonlyincludemeditations,forexample,onAverroes
andAvicennawhereinthereisanaffinityregardingtheuseofhuman
reasonbetweenthesetwofaiths,butwouldalsoincludesome
considerationandadmissionofhowChristianfaithitselfhashistorically
beenquiteamenabletospreadingthefaiththroughviolence(andquite
amenabletoformsofeducationthatarequiteTalibanicintheirclosed
mindednessandliteralist/fundamentalistparanoias).Then,perhaps,his
sentimentalizedjourneythroughtheuniversitiesofGermanyofhis
youthmighthavebeen,asthetitleofhisjourneydeclares,truly
“Apostolic”andEcumenical,andnotquitesoincendiary.
CONCLUSION
WeendthesemediationsontheLibrarianofBasrawithafascinating
incidentwhosemeaninggoesfarbeyonditsintent.Earlyin2007,Rahat
Naqvi,HelenCoburn,SallyGoddard,andLaureenMayer(2007)
submittedanarticletotheAlbertaTeachers’AssociationMagazine
entitled“WhatdoIdowhen80percentofmystudentsdon’tspeak
English?”Thisbriefresearchreportspokeofworkdoneondual
languagebooksbeingusedinalocalCalgaryelementaryschool.
Thepaperpassedintotheadjudicationandeditorialprocessand
nothingmorewasheardofituntiltheprintedmagazinearrivedinR.
N.’scampusmail.AlongwithR.N.’sdiscoveryofJeanetteWinter’s
lovelybook,thisisthemomentatwhichthisarticleofoursbegan.
Unbeknowntoitsauthors,thepaperhadbeenretitled.Althoughthe
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 661
subtitleremainedastheauthorshadwrittenit,themaintitlenowwas
“SpeakinginTongues.”Alongwiththis,therewasaphotographof
sevengirls,eachonedressedinwhatappeartobeethniccostumes.
Clearly,onthefaceofit,thisnewtitleprobablyseemedsimplymore
catchythantheauthors’originaltitle.Ithassincecaughttheeyeofmany
readerswhohavecontactedtheauthorsabouttheirwork.Itserves,
howeverandalso,asopportunitytothinkaboutAlGhazali,for
example,andhisintimateconnectionwithSufismwhichreferencesa
phenomenonsimilarto“speakingintongues.”However,thisprecise
phraseispeculiarlyChristianinitsoriginsandcontemporaryface.Those
whochoseitforatitlearesimplylivingwithinafamiliaritythatgoes
beyondwhattheymayhaveintendedbysuchachoiceofphrase.
ManyChristiansbelievethatspeakingintonguesisthefulfillmentofthe
LatterRainpromisedinJoel2:2829andthatitisthefinalmanifestationofthe
HolySpiritbeforetheSecondComingofChrist.Itisalsocommonlytaughtthat
youarenotsavedunlessyouhavedemonstratedthegiftofspeakingintongues.
(http://www.speakingintongues.net/)
Aswehavesuggested,thiseditorialchangeismoremeaningfulthan
itwasmeanttobe.Itopenedgapingholesinwhatwethoughtweknew,
anddisturbedoursenseoffamiliarityandbelonging.Itisaperhaps
unintendedgift.
However,wewillleavethismeditationforanothertime.
REFERENCES
Aaronovitch,D.(2003,June10).LostfromtheBaghdadmuseum:Truth.The
GuardianUnlimited.RetrievedAugust4,2007,from
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq
Arnaldez,R.(2006).EntryonIbnHazm.RetrievedSeptember30,2007,from
http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/hazm/ibnhazm.htm
BenedictXVI.(2006,September12).Faith,reasonandtheuniversity:Memories
andreflections.AspeechbyBenedictXVI,totheAulaMagnaofthe
UniversityofRegensburg.RetrievedSeptember22,2007,from
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/Septem
662   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
ber/documents/hf_benxvi_spe_20060912_universityregensburg_en
.html
ButlerJ.(2004).Precariouslife:Thepowerofmourningandviolence.London,UK:
Verso.
Clarke,J.J.(1997).Orientalenlightenment:theencounterbetweenAsianandWestern
thought.London,UK:Routledge.
Dussel,E.(2000).Europe,modernity,andEurocentrism.Neplanta:Viewsfromthe
South,1(3),465478.
Feldman,L.(2003,March14).TheimpactofBushlinking9/11andIraq:
AmericanAttitudesaboutaconnectionhavechanged,firmingupthe
caseforwar.TheChristianScienceMonitor.RetrievedSeptember16,
2007,fromhttp://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01woiq.html
Gadamer,H.G.(1989).Truthandmethod(J.Weinsheimer,Trans.).NewYork:
ContinuumBooks.
Gadamer,H.G.(2007).TheGadamerreader:Abouquetoflaterwritings(R.E.
Palmer[Editor],Trans.).Evanston,IL:NorthwesternUniversityPress.
Gray,J.(2001).Falsedawn:Thedelusionsofglobalcapitalism.NewYork:TheNew
Press.
Gray,J.(2003).AlQaedaandwhatitmeanstobemodern.NewYork:TheNew
Press.
Halsall,P.(Ed.).(2006).Medievalsourcebook:Petrarch:TheascentofMountVentoux.
RetrievedJanuary15,2008,fromFordhamUniversityCenterfor
MedievalStudiesWebsite:http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/
petrarchventoux.html
Herrin,J.(1987).TheformationofChristendom.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversity
Press.
Humphreys,K.(2004).DeathontheNile‐‐MurderofHypatia,endofclassic
scholarshipinEgypt.RetrievedSeptember22,2007,from
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/hypatia.html
Illich,I.(1992).Inthemirrorofthepast:addressesandlectures:19781990.NewYork:
MarionBoyarsPublishers.
Jardine,D.(2004).ʺAsingletruthaloneʺ:Someculturalcurrentsfromupnorth.
InP.B.Urhmacher,C.Trousas,&C.Moroye(Eds.),[Current
Currents(379386)].TheInternationalJournalofLeadershipinEducation,
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 663
7(4),382386.
Jardine,D.(2005).Piagetandeducation:Aprimer.NewYork:PeterLang
Publishing.
Jardine,D.(2006).Teachereducationintheshadowofwarconsciousness.
UnpublishedtalkgivenastheDistinguishedLecture,Facultyof
Education,UniversityofCalgary,November,2006,Calgary,Alberta.
Jardine,D.(2006a).Cuttingnature’sleadingstrings:Acautionarytaleabout
constructivism.InD.Jardine,S.Friesen,&P.Clifford(Eds.),Curriculum
inabundance(pp.123136).Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.
Jardine,D.(2006b).Dreamingofasinglelogic.Foreword.InD.G.Smith
(Author),Tryingtoteachinaseasonofgreatuntruth:Globalization,empire
andthecrisesofpedagogy(pp.ixxvii).Rotterdam,NL:SensePublishers.
Jardine,D.(2006c).“Youthdemandsimagesforitsimaginationandforforming
itsmemory.”JournalofCurriculumTheorizing,22(3),7180.
Jardine,D.,Clifford,P.,&Friesen,S.(inpress).Backtothebasicsofteachingand
learning:Thinkingtheworldtogether(2nded.).NewYork:Routledge.
Jardine,D.,Friesen,S.,&Clifford,P.(Eds.).(2006).Curriculuminabundance.
Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.
Joffe,A.(2004,Spring).MuseummadnessinBaghdad.MiddleEastQuarterly,
XI(2).RetrievedJune30,2006,fromhttp://www.meforum.org/
article/609
Kemal,S.(2007).EntryonAvicenna.RetrievedSeptember16,2007,from
http://www.muslimphilosophy.com
Kincheloe,J.L.(2006).Howdidthishappen?Therightwingpoliticsof
knowledgeandeducation.InJ.L.Kincheloe&S.R.Steinberg(Eds.),
Whatyoudon’tknowaboutschools(pp.3168).NewYork:Palgrave
MacMillan.
McMurtry,J.(1998).Unequalfreedoms:theglobalmarketasanethicalsystem.
Toronto:GaramondPress.
Miller,A.(1990).Foryourowngood:Hiddencrueltyinchildrearingandtherootsof
violence.VancouverBC:Douglas&McIntyre(H.HanuumandH.
Hannum,Trans.).
Mommsen,T.E.(1942).PetrarchʹsconceptionoftheʹDarkAges.ʹSpeculum,17(2),
226242.
664   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
Moosa,E.(2005).Ghazaliandthepoeticsoftheimagination.ChapelHill,NC:The
UniversityofNorthCarolinaPress.
Nandy,A.(1987)Culturalframesforsocialtransformation:ACredo.Alternatives,
(12),113123.
Naqvi,R.,Coburn,H.,Goddard,S.,&Mayer,L.(2007).Speakingintongues:
WhatdoIdowhen80percentofmystudentsdon’tspeakEnglish?The
ATA[AlbertaTeachers’Association]Magazine,87(4),811.Retrieved
January16,2008,fromhttp://www.teachers.ab.ca/Quick+Links/
Publications/Magazine/Volume+87/Number+4/Articles/Speaking+in+To
ngues.htm
Naqvi,R.&Jardine,D.(inpress)“Somesaythepresentageisnotthetimefor
meditation”:Thoughtsonthingsleftunsaidincontemporary
invocationsof“traditionaleducation.”InD.Jardine,P.Clifford,&S.
Friesen(Eds.),Backtothebasicsofteachingandlearning:Thinkingtheworld
together(2nded.).NewYork:Routledge.
Naqvi,R.&Prasow,C.(2007).Precariouspositionings.JournaloftheAmerican
AssociationfortheAdvancementofCurriculumStudies,3.Retrieved
September30,2007,fromhttp://www.uwstout.edu/soe/jaaacs/vol3
/naqviprasow.htm
Netton,I.R.(1998).EntryonAbuNasrMuhammadibnMuhammadibn
TarkhanibnAwzalaghalFarabi.RetrievedSeptember16,2007,from
http://www.muslimphilosophy.com
OnlineEtymologyDictionary(OED).(2001).RetrievedSeptember30,2007,from
http://www.etymonline.com/
Postel,D.&Drury,S.(2003,October18).Nobleliesandperpetualwar:Leo
Strauss,theneocons,andIraq(DannyPostelinterviewsShadiaDrury).
InformationClearingHouse.RetrievedOctober1,2007,fromhttp://www.
informationclearinghouse.info/article5010.htm
Rasmussen,L.(2003,February2).ʺTheeverlastingcovenant.ʺRetrievedOctober
2,2007,fromhttp://www.stjoan.com/homilies3/rasmussen2.02.03.htm
Smith,D.G.(2003).Onenfraudeningthepublicsphere,thefutilityofempireand
thefutureofknowledgeafterʹAmerica.ʹPolicyFuturesinEducation,1(3),
488503.RetrievedSeptember16,2007fromhttp://www.wwwords
.co.uk/pdf/viewpdf.asp?j=pfie&vol=1&issue=3&year=2003&article=4_S
mith_PFIE_1_3_web&id=24.70.95.205 
LEARNINGNOTTOSPEAKINTONGUES 665
Smith,D.G.(2006).Tryingtoteachinaseasonofgreatuntruth:globalization,empire
andthecrisesofpedagogy.Rotterdam,NL:SensePublishers.
Smith,D.G.(2006a).Troubleswiththesacredcanopy:Globalcitizenshipina
seasonofgreatuntruth.InG.Richardson&D.Blades(Eds.),Troubling
thecanonofcitizenshipeducation(pp.124135).NewYork:PeterLang
Publishers.
Smith,D.G.(2006b)ʺʹ...thefarthestWestisbutthefarthestEastʹ:ThelongWay
ofOriental/Occidentalengagementʺ.InC.Eppert&H.Wang(Eds.),
Easternthought,educationalinsights:Newhorizonsincurriculum(pp.35
58).Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaum&Associates.
Smith,D.G.(inpress).FromLeoStrausstoCollapseTheory:Consideringthe
neoconservativeattackonmodernityandtheworkofeducation.Critical
StudiesinEducation.
Talbot,A.(2003,April19).ThelootingofBaghdad’smuseumandlibrary‐US
governmentimplicatedinplannedtheftofIraqiartistictreasures.
WorldSocialistWebSite.RetrievedJanuary16,2008,fromhttp://www.
wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/loota19.shtml
Teixeira,R.(2006).Publicopinionwatch.CenterforAmericanProgress.Retrieved
September16,2007,fromhttp://www.americanprogress.org/issues
/2006/03/b1500197.html
Thomas,Aquinas,Saint.(1986).Thedivisionandmethodsofthesciences:QuestionsV
andVIofhisCommentaryontheDeTrinitateofBoethius(A.Maurer,
Trans.).Toronto:PontificalInstituteofMediaevelStudies.
Vico,G.(1984).ThenewscienceofGiambattistaVico.Unabridgedtranslationofthe
thirdedition(1744)withtheadditionof“PracticoftheNewScience”(T.G.
Bergin&M.H.Fisch,Trans.).Ithaca,NY:CornellUniversityPress.
Winter,J.(2005).ThelibrarianofBasra:AtruestoryfromIraq.Toronto:
Harcourt,Inc.
Wittgenstein,L.(1968).Philosophicalinvestigations(G.E.M.Anscombe,Trans.).
Oxford,UK:BasilBlackwell.
Zahoor,A.(1997).EntryonAbulWaleedMuhammadIbnRushd(L.Averroes).
RetrievedSeptember16,2007,fromhttp://www.muslimphilosophy.com
DavidW.JardineisaProfessorofEducationintheFacultyofEducation,
UniversityofCalgary.RecentworkincludesPiagetandeducation:Aprimer(2006).
666   DAVIDJARDINE&RAHATNAQVI
RecentpapersincludeʺOntheWhileofThingsʺ (JournaloftheAmerican
AssociationfortheAdvancementofCurriculumStudies)and“Somesaythepresent
ageisnotthetimeformeditation,”coauthoredwithRahatNaqvi(Journalof
EducationalThought).Contact:jardine@ucalgary.ca.11thFloorEducationTower,
FacultyofEducation,UniversityofCalgary,2500UniversityDriveNW,Calgary,
ABT2N1N4Ph:4032205642
RahatNaqviisanAssistantProfessorintheFacultyofEducation,specializingin
FrenchandSecondLanguagePedagogy.Dr.Naqvihasworkedinavarietyof
internationalsettingsthatincludeFrenchandAsianStudiesattheNational
InstituteofOrientalLanguages,Sorbonne,Paris.Researchinterestsinclude
secondlanguagepedagogy,teachingFSL,interculturalcommunication,literacy,
identity,andculturalstudies.
Contact:naqvi@ucalgary.ca11thFloorEducationTower,FacultyofEducation,
UniversityofCalgary,2500UniversityDriveNW,Calgary,ABT2N1N4
Ph:4032202047