ArticlePDF Available

The Impact of Dental aesthetics among adolescents

Authors:

Abstract

The relationship between global self-esteem and dental self-confidence suggests the need to draw attention to psychological aspects involved in the treatment in order to promote not only the dental health, but also the psychological well-being.
Pubblicato da Redazione il 6 dic 2013 - ID Articolo: 37518
The Impact of Dental aesthetics among adolescents
Settineri Salvatore1, Mento Carmela2, Rizzo Amelia3
The relationship between global self-esteem and dental self-confidence
suggests the need to draw attention to psychological aspects involved in the
treatment in order to promote not only the dental health, but also the
psychological well-being.
Background
The concern for some imaginary defect in the physical
appearance, more often referred to the face, in a person with
normal appearance is called, according to the DSM-IV, Body
Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD). It occurs between adolescence
and early adulthood, and about 2% of these patients resort to
visits dermatology, plastic and dental interventions in a
continuous, excessive and ineffective way to satisfy them both
physically and psychologically.
During the adolescence, a delicate and transitional stage of physical and psychological
development to new environmental and psychological structures, some elements of
appearance and, more specifically, dental aesthetics have great importance for the
adolescent’s self-image and self-esteem (de Paula et al., 2009).
Furthermore, malocclusion significantly affects the appearance of the smile, which is a
part of notable facial attractiveness and an effective way of expressing emotions.
Therefore, the aesthetic impact of malocclusion may have a more or less significant
consequence on the adolescent’s quality of life, can impair social interaction, interpersonal
relationships, and psychological well-being; until producing feelings of inferiority (Broder et
al., 2000).
Our study, recently published in the Indian Journal of Research [Paripex article ] , aimed
to verify the relationship between the dysmorphic level and the psychosocial impact of
dental aesthetics among adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment.
1 Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology, University of Messina salvatore.settineri@unime.it
2 Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology, University of Messina cmento@unime.it
3 PhD student in Psychological Sciences, University of Messina amrizzo@unime.it
1
Main Results
Quality of Body Image. Patients suffering of BDD tend more easily both to require
orthodontic treatments and to be dissatisfied about their most recent treatment (De
Jongh et al.,2009; Crerand et al., 2006). Adolescents in our sample showed a
dysmorphic level from mild to moderate, except for 8% of the cases to which could
be diagnosed as a BDD: 32% of subjects identifies their physical defect in the
braces, mouth and / or teeth. Generally in adolescents the most common areas of
concern are skin, hair, stomach, weight, and at least teeth (Phillips, 2006).
Orthodontists should be alert for patients extremely concerned about insignificant or
negligible dental flaws or defects, reporting multiple requests for orthodontic
treatment or seeking evaluations with several professionals (Hepburn, S., &
Cunningham, 2006).
Self esteem. Malocclusion and aestetics concerns affect self esteem. In our sample
its level is at the lower limits of normal and 18% of subjects showed even lower than
normal level of self-esteem. Most of them are females and this data confirms a well-
established knowledge in the literature: girls have lower levels of self-esteem than
boys (Kling, 1999).
Self perception of malocclusion. Dentists and patients could differ in the
evaluation of the gravity of malocclusion. Several studies compared the self
perception with the objective judjement established by professional. Most (Danaei &
Salehi, 2010; Badran, 2010; Kerosuo et al., 2004; Grzywacz, 2003; Fox et al., 2000;
Birkeland et al.,1996) showed significant agreement (between 77% and 85%) for
what concern dental aesthetic and a less agreement (usually little more than 50%)
for what concern dental health component. It’s an interesting fact that, in our study,
there was no relationship between the subjective judgment of the patient on its
degree of malocclusion and the evaluation of the dentist.
Personal experience of dental aestethics. Younger patients, who wear the braces
from less time, emerged as more concerned and with higher levels of psychological
and social impact linked to dental aesthetics. This is an aspect that should be
considered during the treatment in order to early detect signs of discomfort in
adolescent’s quality of life and well-being.
In conclusion, from the psychological point of view, it is possible that self-esteem is a
protective factor in the development of body image disorders, being strongly linked not
only with each other but also to higher levels of obsessive-compulsive, depressive and
somatization tendencies (Biby, 1998). Moreover, from the dental point of view, the
relationship between global self-esteem and dental self-confidence suggests the need to
draw attention to psychological aspects involved in the treatment in order to promote not
only the dental health, but also the psychological well-being.
The Research Project
This study is part of a broader line of research that originates from the collaboration
between two disciplines: Dentistry and Psychology. Since 2005, several studies have been
carried out by the Chair of Clinical Psychology and the Chai of Dentistry, at the University
of Messina, which have focused on different aspects of dental and mental health such as:
gender differences in dental anxiety (Settineri et al., 2005), self reported halitosis (Settineri
2
et al. 2010), dental anxiety and psychopathologies (Settineri et al., 2013).
References
Biby, E. L. (1998). The relationship between body dysmorphic disorder and depression, self
esteem, somatization, and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(4),
489-499.
Broder H.L., Slade G., Caine R., Reisine S. Perceived impact of oral health conditions among
minority adolescents. Journal of Public Health Dentistry. Vol. 60, pp.189–192.
de Paula, Júnior D.F., Santos N., da Silva E., Nunes M.F., and Leles C. R. (2009). Psychosocial
Impact of Dental Esthetics on Quality of Life in Adolescents. The Angle Orthodontist. Vol. 79, No. 6,
pp. 1188-1193.
Hepburn S., Cunningham S., (2006). Body dysmorphic disorder in adult orthodontic patients.
American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics. Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages 569-
574.
Juggins K.J., Feinmann C., Shute J., Cunningham S.J., (2006). Psychological support for
orthognathic patients – what do orthodontists want?. Journal of Orthodontics. Vol. 33, pp. 107–115.
Klages U., Claus N., Wehrbein H. and Zentner A. (2006). Development of a questionnaire for
assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults. European Journal of
Orthodontics, Vol. 28, Issue 2, pp.103-111.
Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-
esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin,125(4), 470.
Phillips K.A., Didie E.R., Menard W., Pagano M., Fay C., Weisberg R. (2006).Clinical features of
body dysmorphic disorder in adolescents and adults. Psychiatry Research, vol. 141 (3), pp. 305–
314.
Settineri, S., Tatì, F., & Fanara, G. (2005). Gender differences in dental anxiety: is the chair
position important. J Contemp Dent Pract, 6(1), 115-22.
Settineri, S., Mento, C., Gugliotta, S. C., Saitta, A., Terranova, A., Trimarchi, G., & Mallamace,
D. (2010). Self-reported halitosis and emotional state: impact on oral conditions and treatments.
Health Qual Life Outcomes, 8, 34.
Settineri, S., Mallamace, D., Muscatello, M. R. A., Zoccali, R., & Mento, C. (2013). Dental
anxiety, psychiatry and dental treatment: How are they linked?. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 3, 168-
172.
Settineri S., Mento C., Rizzo A., Liotta M., Militi A., Terranova A. (2013). Dysmorphic level and
impact of Dental Aestetics among adolescents. Indian Journal of research, 1; 2(7).
3
... Therefore, their good oral health knowledge as well as OHRQoL is consequential for their better oral health as well as overall growth as an individual. 3,15 The present study comprised 900 school-going children, in the age group of 12-15 years, who were included from 60 schools across Modinagar, Ghaziabad. Out of the total sample included, 400 children were from the government and 500 children were from private schools. ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to verify the relationship between the dysmorphic level and the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics among adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. 61 subjects, between 12 and 22 years, completed the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics (PIDAQ), the Rosenberg’s Self esteem Scale and were interviewed with the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Interview (BDDE). The data showed significant correlations between self esteem, self dental confidence (SDC) and dental aesthetics’ psychological impact (IP). In addition, items that fulfill specific criteria for the Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) showed significant relationships not only with the psychological (PI) and social impact (SI), but also with the patient’s beliefs (PB ) relating to the role of dental aesthetics in their lives. The body image of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment is moderately negative. Psychological factors involved concern not only the dental self-confidence, but also the overall assessment of self-esteem.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The autonomy of dental anxiety may be compared with other psychopathologies, however, it is classified as indicative of a specific phobia. It is interesting to know how dental anxiety operates within a wider context. Material and Method: The group was made by 514 subjects, recruited from several dental surgeries. The entire process, consisted in self-compilation of the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). The software used for statistical calculations was the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. The chi-square test was used for the distribution of the nominal variables. Results: The analysis of data revealed a significantly different distribution between high and low levels of dental anxiety and comorbidity in relation to only one diagnostic category, namely mood disorders. Dental fears and comorbidity were mostly in line with our expectations, except about fear of needles with eating disorders. Dental anxiety is to be considered as a dimension on a par with other psychopathologies. Conclusions: The study of comorbidity between mood disorders and dental anxiety, suggests that dental anxiety rather than belonging to the family of anxiety disorders would be better classified along with mood disorders. The findings regarding emotional inducers (fears) in relation to the distribution of psychopathology are worth noting. The above observations reaffirm the need to form links between dentistry and psychiatry.
Article
Full-text available
Halitosis represents a common dental condition, although sufferers are often not conscious of it. The aim of this study was to examine behavior in a sample of Italian subjects with reference to self-reported halitosis and emotional state, and specifically the presence of dental anxiety. The study was performed on Italian subjects (N = 1052; range 15-65 years). A self-report questionnaire was used to detect self-reported halitosis and other variables possibly linked to it (sociodemographic data, medical and dental history, oral hygiene, and others), and a dental anxiety scale (DAS) divided into two subscales that explore a patient's dental anxiety and dental anxiety concerning dentist-patient relations. Associations between self-reported halitosis and the above mentioned variables were examined using multiple logistic regression analysis. Correlations between the two groups, with self-perceived halitosis and without, were also investigated with dental anxiety and with the importance attributed to one's own mouth and that of others. The rate of self-reported halitosis was 19.39%. The factors linked with halitosis were: anxiety regarding dentist patient relations (relational dental anxiety) (OR = 1.04, CI = 1.01-1.07), alcohol consumption (OR = 0.47, CI = 0.34-0.66), gum diseases (OR = 0.39, CI = 0.27-0.55), age > 30 years (OR = 1.01, CI = 1.00-1.02), female gender (OR = 0.71, CI = 0.51-0.98), poor oral hygiene (OR = 0.65, CI = 0.43-0.98), general anxiety (OR = 0.66, CI = 0.49-0.90), and urinary system pathologies (OR = 0.46, CI = 0.30-0.70). Other findings emerged concerning average differences between subjects with or without self-perceived halitosis, dental anxiety and the importance attributed to one's own mouth and that of others. Halitosis requires professional care not only by dentists, but also psychological support as it is a problem that leads to avoidance behaviors and thereby limits relationships. It is also linked to poor self care. In the study population, poor oral health related to self-reported halitosis was associated with dental anxiety factors.
Article
Full-text available
To test the hypothesis that several dimensions of the self-perceived psychosocial impacts of dental esthetics are not associated with grades of malocclusion, oral health-related quality-of-life measures, and body self-image in adolescents. This cross-sectional study included a convenience sample of 301 adolescents (mean age 16.1 +/- 1.8 years, 58.1% female subjects). Demographic data were collected and dental conditions were assessed. The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) was used for assessment of malocclusion and determination of orthodontic treatment needs. The short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), and the Body Satisfaction Scale (BSS) were used to measure adolescents' self-perceived variables. All variables (DAI, OHIP-14, and BSS) were correlated with PIDAQ (P < .001). Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed significant associations (P < .001) of independent variables with the total score of PIDAQ (R(2) = 0.29) and dental self-confidence (R(2) = 0.30), social impact (R(2) = 0.14), psychological impact (R(2) = 0.23), and esthetic concern (R(2) = 0.13). The hypothesis is rejected. A broad range of adolescents' self-perceived impact of dental esthetics is influenced by severity of malocclusion, oral health-related quality of life, and body satisfaction.
Article
Full-text available
Two analyses were conducted to examine gender differences in global self-esteem. In analysis I, a computerized literature search yielded 216 effect sizes, representing the testing of 97,121 respondents. The overall effect size was 0.21, a small difference favoring males. A significant quadratic effect of age indicated that the largest effect emerged in late adolescence (d = 0.33). In Analysis II, gender differences were examined using 3 large, nationally representative data sets from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). All of the NCES effect sizes, which collectively summarize the responses of approximately 48,000 young Americans, indicated higher male self-esteem (ds ranged from 0.04 to 0.24). Taken together, the 2 analyses provide evidence that males score higher on standard measures of global self-esteem than females, but the difference is small. Potential reasons for the small yet consistent effect size are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to develop a psychometric instrument for assessment of orthodontic-specific aspects of quality of life. The study subjects, 194 young adults aged 18–30 years, were interviewed using a pool of 23 items dealing with the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics. Self- and interviewer-rating of the dental aesthetic appearance of each subject were carried out using the Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Additionally, the Perception of Occlusion Scale and a modification of the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) were applied. Factorial analyses identified four measures within the item pool, namely Dental Self-Confidence, Social Impact, Psychological Impact, and Aesthetic Concern. The factor structure was confirmed in an independent sample of 83 subjects aged 18–33 years. The reliabilities of the factor analysis-derived scales were between alpha (a) 0.85 and 0.91. They differed between respondents with varying severity of malocclusion, as assessed by subject and interviewer ratings. The results suggest that the proposed instrument, termed the ‘Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire’ (PIDAQ), meets the criteria of factorial stability across samples and criterion-related validity and reliability, and might be a promising tool for further research and clinical application in orthodontics.
Article
The present study investigated the relationship of depression, self-esteem, somatization, and obsessive-compulsive disorder to the incidence of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). Female (n=83) and male (n=25) undergraduates completed measures of body esteem, self-esteem, obsessive-compulsive behavior, and somatization. Subjects were also screened for eating disorders utilizing the DSM-IV criteria for such in an effort to control for anorexia and bulimia. Upon excluding those subjects who met the criteria for eating disorders, the final sample included 78 females and 24 males. The results indicated that lower body esteem scores were linked with lower levels of self-esteem but with higher levels of obsessive-compulsive tendencies, depressive tendencies, and somatization tendencies. The findings are discussed with regard to the need for more accurate measures of body dysmorphic disorder, as well as etiology and future treatment implications.
Article
This study assessed the perceived impact of oral health conditions, and the relationship of two measures of self-reported outcome, the RAND SF-36 and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), to clinical indicators of oral health among inner-city adolescents. A convenience sample of 93 minority adolescents completed the RAND SF-36 and the OHIP and 76 of them completed a clinical dental examination assessing DMFS. Participants averaged 14.4 (SD = 1.2) years old; 52 percent were female; and 86 percent were African-American. The mean DMFS was 8.8 (SD = 6.3). Participants reported relatively poor general health on the SF-36 as well as poor oral health on the OHIP. None of the SF-36 subscales were significantly related to DMFS. OHIP subscales were consistently related to DMFS--those with worse oral health reported more impacts. With the exception of the bodily pain subscale of the SF-36, the SF-36 and OHIP subscales were significantly correlated with Pearson's correlations ranging from -.21 to -.57 (P < .05). Although the SF-36 and the OHIP were correlated, the OHIP appears to be more highly associated with the impacts of oral health conditions than the SF-36 among inner-city adolescents who reported low general and oral health quality of life.
Article
Dental anxiety in the general population is more prevalent in females than in males. The presence of dental anxiety was studied in a group of 189 females and 176 males using the following scales: the Dental Anxiety Scale (divided into DAS 1 containing 6 items, which explores a patient's dental anxiety and DAS 2 containing 13 items, which looks at dental anxiety concerning dentist-patient relations), the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and the Quality of Life Index (QL-Index). The results obtained showed significant differences only in relation to dental anxiety regarding the use of instruments (such as needles and handpieces) and the tilted-back position of the chair (DAS 1). No significant gender differences emerged between the two groups in relation to dental anxiety regarding dentist-patient relations (DAS 2), depression (SDS), and the quality of life (QL-Index). The results may explain why women avoid dental care and indicate new designs to make the chair position more comfortable would be useful. Citation Settineri S, Tatì F, Fanara G. Gender Differences in Dental Anxiety: Is the Chair Position Important? J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 February;(6)1:115-122.
Article
Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) usually begins during adolescence, but its clinical features have received little investigation in this age group. Two hundred individuals with BDD (36 adolescents; 164 adults) completed interviewer-administered and self-report measures. Adolescents were preoccupied with numerous aspects of their appearance, most often their skin, hair, and stomach. Among the adolescents, 94.3% reported moderate, severe, or extreme distress due to BDD, 80.6% had a history of suicidal ideation, and 44.4% had attempted suicide. Adolescents experienced high rates and levels of impairment in school, work, and other aspects of psychosocial functioning. Adolescents and adults were comparable on most variables, although adolescents had significantly more delusional BDD beliefs and a higher lifetime rate of suicide attempts. Thus, adolescents with BDD have high levels of distress and rates of functional impairment, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. BDD's clinical features in adolescents appear largely similar to those in adults.