Hamilton Acute Pain Service Safety Study

ArticleinAnesthesiology 120(1):97-109 · January 2014with25 Reads
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a76f59 · Source: PubMed
Although intravenous patient-controlled analgesia opioids and epidural analgesia offer improved analgesia for postoperative patients treated on an acute pain service, these modalities also expose patients to some risk of serious morbidity and even mortality. Root cause analysis, a process for identifying the causal factor(s) that underlie an adverse event, has the potential to identify and address system issues and thereby decrease the chance of recurrence of these complications. This study was designed to compare the incidence of adverse events on an acute pain service in three hospitals, before and after the introduction of a formal root cause analysis process. The "before" cohort included all patients with pain from February 2002 to July 2007. The "after" cohort included all patients with pain from January 2009 to December 2009. A total of 35,384 patients were tracked over the 7 yr of this study. The after cohort showed significant reductions in the overall event rate (1.47 vs. 2.35% or 1 in 68 vs. 1 in 42, the rate of respiratory depression (0.41 vs. 0.71%), the rate of severe hypotension (0.78 vs. 1.34%), and the rate of patient-controlled analgesia pump programming errors (0.0 vs. 0.08%). Associated with these results, the incidence of severe pain increased from 6.5 to 10.5%. To achieve these results, 26 unique recommendations were made of which 23 being completed, 1 in progress, and 2 not completed. Formal root cause analysis was associated with an improvement in the safety of patients on a pain service. The process was effective in giving credibility to recommendations, but addressing all the action plans proved difficult with available resources.
  • Full-text · Article · Jul 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The postoperative period is a crucial time for patients. Careful monitoring, integrated with a treatment plan that takes into account the basal pathologies and postoperative peculiarities of specific interventions (surgical site, blood losses, pain intensity, hospitalization duration), is able to reduce the complications and, thus, postoperative morbidity and hospital stay. Recent guidelines on perioperative treatment emphasize the role of simultaneous therapeutic measures, ensuring safe risk-management pathways such as prevention of surgical site infections, thromboembolic prophylaxis, strategies to reduce the incidence of perioperative stroke, and strategies to ensure enhanced techniques integrating postoperative analgesia, nausea and vomiting control, early mobilization, and enteral nutrition [1, 2]. The main integrated recommendations below are derived from the guidelines on the treatment of postoperative pain, characterized by levels of evidence A and B [3–7].
    Chapter · Jan 2015 · ains · Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Despite anaesthesia-specific pharmacological and technological innovations in the last decades we are definitely aware that anaesthesia per se has the potential to induce changes in the balance of human physiology that in turn may have relevant consequences, i.e. an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Today anaesthesia appears to be extremely safe, with the number of deaths solely attributed to anaesthesia having reached its lowest point in history (0.055 per 10 000 anaesthetics). However, the available data regarding anaesthesia-related mortality, solely or contributory, are not consistent and the interpretation and legibility is limited. Fortunately, the issue of "patient safety in anaesthesiology" has gained increasing interest in the last few years, yielding some very promising projects. Since most of the ideas are focused on intraoperative safety improvement strategies, it seems to be reasonable in the near future to expand to the complete perioperative period, especially the postoperative care on the ward in high-risk patients. This knowledge, combined with an ongoing promotion of patient safety in anaesthesiology and provision of adequate resources definitely will increase patient safety. Hopefully, in the end, our efforts will contribute to integrate the "patient safety in anaesthesiology concept" in daily clinical routine. © Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015
Show more