ChapterPDF Available

Biofeedback, mind-body medicine, and the higher limits of human nature

Authors:
Biofeedback, Mind-Body Medicine, and the Higher Limits of Human Nature
Donald Moss, Ph.D.
A chapter included in: D. Moss (Ed.). (1998). Humanistic and Transpersonal Psychology:
A Historical and Biographical Sourcebook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
Reprinted with permission of Greenwood Publishing Group. This book is available from
AAPB’s Bookstore or from Greenwood at
http://info.greenwood,com/books/o313291/0313291586.html
Abstract: Chapter Ten summarizes the Biofeedback movement, which serves as the arena where "high tech" meets
the higher states of consciousness. The concept of biofeedback was introduced at a conference in Santa Monica in
1969. The image of electronic equipment guiding human beings to a greater awareness and control over their own
physiology and consciousness appealed to both white coated experimental scientists and the white robed gurus of the
higher consciousness movement. Biofeedback encourages the humanistic dream that the human being can become
creator of his or her own ever perfecting health and nature.
The Birth of Biofeedback: 1969
A new interdisciplinary paradigm emerged throughout the late 1960's, unifying developments from the
diverse fields of psychology, neurophysiology, cybernetics, and medicine, culminating in a number of key
publications in the final year of the decade: In 1969 Neal Miller published an article in Science on the “Learning of
Visceral and Glandular Responses.” Elmer Green was senior author for two classic articles in the same year --
“Self-Regulation of Internal States” (in Proceedings of the International Congress of Cybernetics), and “Feedback
Technique for Deep Relaxation” (in Psychophysiology). Charles Tart also published his edited compendium Altered
States of Consciousness (Tart, 1969), including several articles on feedback techniques or operant conditioning
modifying neuro-physiological processes.
In the same year key publications in systems theory and cybernetics gave wider dissemination to new
concepts of feedback within systems, which were to be so critical in understanding self-regulatory phenomena.
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 2
Ludwig Van Bertalanffy contributed a chapter to General Systems Theory and Psychiatry (1969); and Herbert Simon
published The Science of the Artificial (1969).
"Biofeedback" as a model and technique was ready to be born: A scientist applies sensitive electronic
instruments to provide meaningful information about physiologic processes to an animal or human subject. In turn,
the subject gains greater awareness and control over the physiology and self-regulates more effectively.
Bio-feedback, the providing of information back to a subject about life processes, contributes a powerful new tool for
self-mastery, research, and clinical intervention.
In October 1969 the Biofeedback Research Society was formed, held its first meeting in Santa Monica, at the
Surfrider Inn, and the phenomenon of biofeedback officially received its name. We will return to this institutional
history of biofeedback as a profession, after reviewing several of the research and clinical foundations of biofeedback.
The Origins of Biofeedback
The contributions of many earlier researchers and practitioners can be cited as forerunners of biofeedback:
Edmund Jacobsen commenced research at Harvard in 1908, and throughout the 1920's and 1930's worked to develop
progressive muscle relaxation as an effective behavioral technique for the alleviation of neurotic tensions and many
functional medical disorders (Jacobsen, 1938). He used crude electromyographic equipment to monitor the levels of
muscle tension in his patients during the course of treatment. The German Johann Schultz contributed autogenic
training in the 1930's, a discipline for creating a deep low-arousal condition, with a pervasive quieting effect on the
autonomic nervous system (Schultz and Luthe, 1959). B. F. Skinner, Albert Bandura, Joseph Wolpe, and others
extended the operant training principles of the animal laboratory into a refined science of behavior therapy and
behavior modification through instrumental learning (Skinner, 1969; Bandura, 1969; Wolpe and Lazarus, 1966).
The building blocks were in place for a science of self-regulation by the 1960's.
The scientific emergence of biofeedback is a good example of synchronicity. A number of independent areas
of scientific work converged and overlapped, until a community of researchers recognized their common ground.
Kenneth Gaarder points out that biofeedback was not so much a discovery, as it was "an awareness which emerged
from the Zeitgeist" (Gaarder, 1979). Many researchers of the 1950's and 1960's can be cited as independent founders
of biofeedback. I will highlight here the early work on EEG, visceral learning, electromyography, and incontinence.
Operant Control of EEG and the Pursuit of Alpha States
In the late 1950's, Joe Kamiya studied the phenomenon of internal perception or the awareness of private
internal experiencing. Seredipitously, he discovered that a subject could learn through feedback to reliably
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 3
discriminate between alpha and beta dominant cortical states, and then further demonstrated that a subject could learn
to produce such alpha or beta brain states on demand (Kamiya, 1969, 1994; Gaarder & Montgomery, 1977, p. 4).
Kamiya's continuing work on voluntary production of alpha states coincided with the dawning counter-cultural
interest in altered states of consciousness, and the emergence of a new interest in Eastern religions, the psychology of
consciousness, and in transpersonal psychology (Moss & Keen, 1981; deSilva, 1981).
This was the era in which Timothy Leary was attracting media attention, by encouraging youth to use LSD to
discover new levels of human consciousness. In August 1969 the renowned social psychologist, Dr. Richard Alpert,
renamed as Ram Dass, gave a presentation to the annual meeting of the Association for Humanistic Psychology on
“The Transformation of a Man from Scientist to Mystic.”
Alpha brain states are most closely associated with a creative, open awareness, or with a receptive, meditative
state. Kamiya's research gave birth to a new humanistic dream, of human beings learning to cultivate a spiritually
awakened state, within a relatively short time frame, and through the guidance of electronic monitoring. Now human
beings could explore higher states of consciousness without psychedelic drugs.
A host of EEG studies and optimistic clinical reports followed. In 1967 Les Fehmi undertook a series of
experiments on producing brain synchrony in humans, in hopes of enhancing the clarity and scope of information
processing. In another example of serendipity, Fehmi discovered that he dramatically increased his own alpha
production, after he "gave up on the task," out of frustration at being unable to increase alpha. Further study of
voluntary enhancement of alpha brain states, including studies of relaxation and imagery, led Fehmi to highlight a
broadened, diffuse state of awareness. Fehmi contends that this non-focused, non-goal oriented attentional state
serves to release physiological tensions, soften interpersonal relating, and optimize physiological functioning and
health. Out of this program of research Fehmi developed his Open Focus model, for training individuals in a learned,
meditative attentional style (Fehmi & Fritz, 1980; Fehmi & Selzer, 1980; Fehmi, in press). On a more philosophical
level, Fehmi characterizes the human being as Homo qui attendit quomodo attendit, or the species which can attend to
and choose its own style of attention (in press).
The research on alpha brain wave production and meditative spirutual awareness found a ready audience in
the popular press. A new industry emerged, offering "alpha training units," primitive biofeedback instruments, to
assist the meditatively oriented individual in enhancing alpha states.
The scientifically minded community became increasingly skeptical. Ancoli and Kamiya (1978) critiqued
the methodological weaknesses and inconsistencies of many of the early studies on alpha feedback training. They
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 4
found the quality and length of training inadequate in many studies, and criticized researchers for neglecting to
monitor such critical variables as the social interactions between experimenter and subject, and instructional set (1978,
pp. 179-180). In 1979 Basmajian declared that "Alpha feedback is still a mystery but it is not an acceptable treatment
method" (1979, p. 1).
The basic principle that brain processes can be brought under voluntary control remains exciting, and the
scientific evidence for this principle continues to mount four decades later. Further, the interest never entirely faded in
pursuing meditative, alpha dominant states of mind conducive to some kind of spiritual integration. Today's EEG
feedback or neurofeedback movement, however, has also been encouraged by additional pragmatic applications of
brain wave control.
Eugene Peniston's impressive 1989 report on successful outcomes in treating alcoholics with a program
based on enhancing alpha/theta range cortical activity sparked a flood of interest, that altered states of consciousness
could, after all, have benefit for personal growth and recovery (Peniston & Kukolsi, 1989). Similarly, a series of
methodologically cautious reports by Joel Lubar suggested that schoolchildren diagnosed with Attention Deficit and
Hyperactivity Disorder could enhance their attentional capacities through selective EEG training in theta suppression
and enhancement of beta range cortical activity (Lubar, 1989, 1991; Lubar and Shouse, 1977).
The neurofeedback movement of the late 1980's and 1990's continues some of the evangelistic fervor and
methodological carelessness of the 1960's alpha movement. The advances in instrumentation and computer signal
processing in three decades, however, make possible an impressive degree of precision in electro-encephelographic
measurement and real time feedback.
Visceral Learning and the Dream of Controlling One's Own Health
Neal Miller, Leo DeCara, and their colleagues carried out a series of dramatic animal experiments in the
1960's, demonstrating the operant conditioning of a variety of internal autonomically regulated physiologic processes,
including blood pressure, cardiac function, and intestinal activity (Miller & DeCara, 1967; Miller, 1969; Miller, 1978).
Prior to their research physiologists generally assumed that organisms have control over bodily functions governed by
the central nervous system (or "voluntary nervous system"). The internal physiological processes controlled by the
autonomic (or "involuntary") nervous system were regarded as operating beyond conscious awareness or control.
Miller and DeCara used animals paralyzed by curare so that the animals could not produce the desired
visceral changes through voluntary activity mediated by the central nervous system. In this paralyzed state their
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 5
animal subjects were still able to change their visceral functions. A group of thirsty dogs were trained to salivate more
(or to salivate less) to obtain water. Curarized rats were even able to change their EEG.
Many of Neal Miller's experiments on curarized animals have not been successfully replicated, yet his animal
studies spurred further investigations extending the same operant model of visceral learning to human subjects (Miller
& Dworkin, 1974). More importantly, Miller's research inspired the hope that biofeedback can enable a human being
to take a more active role in recovering and maintaining health. Further, it encouraged the dream that human beings
can aspire to previously unimagined levels of personal control over bodily states, reaching unprecedented states of
wellness and self-control.
John Basmajian and the Control of a Single Motor Unit
The skeletal muscles have long been known to be under the human being's conscious control, through the
central nervous system. Human locomotion is based on this conscious control. The individual carelessly pictures the
destination, and begins to move. In that same moment his or her central nervous system fluidly organizes multiple
components of muscular activity into a "kinetic melody," which effectively carries the individual to the goal.
Hundreds and even thousands of "motor units" (each motor unit comprised of many muscle fibers) are recruited into
one such activity or movement. A variety of diseases, injuries, and pathological conditions undermine this
muscular integration, and rehabilitation of muscle pain and functional motor deficits is challenging at best. In many
cases injury destroys the sensory-motor pathway linking brain and muscle, while the muscle fibers themselves remain
structurally intact, but without coordination. Even the healthy individual shows little precise awareness of, or control
over, individual motor units in the muscles. There is no proprioceptive sensation to guide the acquisition of control of
such microscopic areas of muscle function.
John V. Basmajian began a program of research in the 1950's to test the outer limits of voluntary control over
the skeletal muscles. Basmajian utilized surface electrodes over the muscle, and visual (oscilloscope) and auditory
feedback to the subject (Basmajian, 1967). Ultimately he demonstrated that almost any subject could establish
conscious control and training of a single motor unit within a muscle, within a brief time. On one occasion he
monitored the muscle functions of a television interviewer. This interviewer insisted that he would learn the motor
control, while simultaneously conducting the interview for television cameras. Basmajian discouraged this bravado,
yet the interviewer persisted and mastered the motor control with feedback, while carrying out the half hour interview
(Brown, 1980).
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 6
Basmajian's research, and the thousands of investigations which have followed, have established the
powerful role which surface electromyography can play in physical therapy, neuromuscular re-education, and pain
treatment (Moss, Kasman, & Fogel, 1996). The applications range from relieving a tension headache to rehabilitating
foot drop after a stroke. Further, Basmajian's work provides convincing support for the basic biofeedback model. If
an external device is able to provide the human subject with precise information about physiological processes, then
the individual's control over these bodily processes can be increased. Even those muscles (or other organ functions)
that have been damaged by injury or disease process may be brought under some form of compensatory control, once
electronic feedback is provided to the individual. The biofeedback instrument creates a functional substitute (an
external feedback loop), replacing the body's original internal feedback and self-regulatory process.
Arnold Kegel, O. H. Mowrer, and Incontinence
One less glamorous area of clinical biofeedback practice antedates the rest of the biofeedback movement by
at least two decades. In 1947 California gynecologist Arnold Kegel invented the perineometer, to assist his
gynecological patients in controlling urinary leakage. John Perry and Leslie Talcott (1988, 1989) point out that the
perineometer meets all of the definitions of a biofeedback device, including the 10 point definition of biofeedback
proposed by Mark Schwartz (Schwartz & Associates, 1987). The perineometer is an instrument inserted into the
vagina, which measures muscle contraction and provides the patient with immediate feedback, to guide her enhanced
control of urine. The use of this device enhances self-regulation, and avoids personal embarrassment, social stigma,
and costly and often ineffective surgical procedures. Dr. Kegel also introduced the now widely used Kegel exercises,
but it is noteworthy that the Kegel exercises are more effective when their use is accompanied by perineometric
feedback. John Perry points out that the only book on biofeedback ever to reach the New York Times Bestseller List
was The G Spot and Other Recent Discoveries about Human Sexuality (Ladad, Whipple, & Perry, 1981), which
includes discussion of the Kegel exercises and the perineometer.
The field of incontinence treatment also produced another contender for the earliest biofeedback device. O.
Hobart Mowrer, the respected psychological researcher, described the use of a bedwetting alarm in a 1938 article. The
simple device detected wetting, sounded an alarm, and awakened the child and parents (Mowrer & Mowrer, 1938).
This immediate feedback triggered awakening, reflex sphincter contraction, and detrusor muscle relaxation. Through
a process of classical conditioning, the internal cues presented by the filling bladder take over to stimulate the same
response sequence (Collins, 1973). Many children rapidly learn to self-monitor and self-regulate. The process
becomes automatic for most children, to the extent that they sleep through the night without incident.
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 7
These early innovations in daytime and nighttime incontinence treatment have born fruit with dramatic
personal consequences for many individuals. The United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
published practice guidelines for adult urinary incontinence in 1992, recommending biofeedback as the first choice of
treatment (Whitehead, 1995). Research reports show a similar efficacy for biofeedback with fecal incontinence
(Whitehead & Drossman, 1996). These procedures produce a tremendous boon in personal esteem, because the
individual can once again to lead an active life without shame or fear. Further, incontinence is one of the most
frequent reasons many older adults are placed prematurely in nursing home care, and effective treatment preserves the
personal dignity of independent living.
The Rapid Application of Biofeedback Techniques
The work of the above pioneers in biofeedback was not alone. Reports of biofeedback applications to a
variety of medical and emotional disorders proliferated rapidly in the 1960's and 1970's. I will cite just a few of these
investigations: Barry Sterman (1986) demonstrated that EEG guided training of a specific sensori-motor rhythm over
the sensori-motor cortex could suppress some epileptic seizures. Bernard Engel (1973) reported operant control of
cardiac arrhythmias. Chandra Patel (1975) reported on the use of both yoga and biofeedback in hypertension. Elmer
Green, Dale Walters, and Joseph Sargent reported on the use of self-regulation training for migraine headache
(Sargent, Walters, & Green, 1972). Thomas Budzynski, Johann Stoyva, and Charles Adler (1970) reported on the
effects of feedback induced muscle relaxation on tension headaches.
A Science of Self-Regulation
By 1975 the field of biofeedback had established a number of effective treatment protocols, for tension
headache, migraine, lower back pain, temporo-mandibular disorders, hypertension, Raynaud's syndrome,
incontinence, and a number of other functional disorders. The basic instrumentation triad of the EMG, thermal
feedback, and the GSR had emerged as the "workhorses" of the biofeedback clinic. The electromyograph (or EMG)
measures the electrical potential of muscle fibers, and proved to be useful for general relaxation training, the treatment
of headaches and muscular pain, and neuromuscular education. Thermal feedback measures skin temperature,
especially finger temperature, and proved useful as an indirect measure of vaso-constriction or vaso-dilation and blood
flow. Thermal feedback proved useful for migraine headache, Raynaud's disease, hypertension, and general
autonomic relaxation. The Galvanic Skin Response meter (GSR, also referred to as a Skin Conductance or
Electrodermal Activity meter) measures electrical changes in the skin, associated with sympathetic nervous arousal.
The GSR proved useful as an adjunct to psychotherapy and behavior therapy, measuring anxiety and
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 8
cognitive/emotional threat reactions (Fuller, 1977). A variety of additional feedback modalities proved useful for
special applications: the feedback EEG (electroencephalograph), measuring electrical activity on the cortex of the
brain; the pneumograph, measuring respiration rate and pattern; the photo-plethysmograph, measuring heart rate and
blood pulse volume; the perineometer, discussed above; and a variety of other devices (Schwartz and Associates,
1995).
This same time period of the 1960's and 1970's also saw the articulation of a number of concepts framing a
new approach to health, wellness, and the actualization of higher human potential.
Mind-Body Medicine
Humanistic psychology dramatically emphasized the unity of body and mind. Fritz Perls introduced a
number of body awareness exercises into Gestalt therapy, as did the Reichian and other body therapy schools.
Biofeedback took this emphasis on a mind-body unity to a new level and created a mind-body medicine. The
"psycho-physiological principle" was formulated in a variety of ways; Elmer Green and his associates expressed it as
follows: "Every change in the physiological state is accompanied by an appropriate change in the mental-emotional
state, conscious or unconscious, and conversely, every change in the mental-emotional state, conscious or
unconscious, is accompanied by an appropriate change in the physiological state" (Green, Green, & Walters, 1970, p.
3). Body and mind are one, and the pursuit of health requires a holistic, biopsychosocial approach (Green &
Shellenberger, 1991).
Ian Wickramasekera and colleagues have proposed that current applied psychophysiological methods can
serve as a bridge between the traditional biomedical model and the biopsychosocial model in family medicine and
primary care (Wickramasekera, Davies, & Davies, 1996). Over 75 % of patients visiting a primary care physician
present with physical symptoms related to psychosocial and behavioral factors. Engel (1977) called for a
biopsychosocial model for medicine almost two decades ago, but this challenge remains unfulfilled. Wickramasekera
cites a variety of interrelated mind-body techniques -- biofeedback, hypnosis, and cognitive behavior therapy -- as
effective tools for addressing a variety of stress related disorders and somatization disorders. Psychophysiological
assessment and psychophysiological monitoring using sophisticated electronic biofeedback instruments can play a
critical role in effective interventions with medical patients (Wickramasekera, Davies, & Davies, 1996, pp. 223-229).
Dysponesis
George Whatmore and Daniel B. Kohli (1974) used EMG feedback to teach patients to relax muscle groups
and developed the concept of dysponesis, misplaced effort, as a common neurophysiological factor in many functional
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 9
disorders. Many individuals facing stressful situations respond by dramatically increasing efforts in the same old
directions, and drawing on the same old strategies and habits. The result is a misplaced waste of effort and energy.
The concept of dysponesis takes this problem of "doing more of the same" to a neuro-physiological level. In the face
of stress the individual engages in maladaptive muscular efforts, breathing patterns, and autonomic arousal, producing
only illness and fatigue. The promise of biofeedback is to increase awareness of such dysponetic habits, and to
provide an avenue to new more healthful behavioral and physiological habits.
The Stress Response and the Relaxation Response
Hans Selye's (1956) groundbreaking research on stress demonstrated that the human response to stress is an
adaptive biological response with impact on the entire organismic system. Cognitive attention to an approaching
threat triggers an alarm and mobilization response preparing the body for emergency action. The stress response
activates the limbic or emotional brain, and the hypothalamus, which then stimulate large portions of the sympathetic
nervous system and the endocrine system. The result is a flood of stress hormones (including ACTH), elevated blood
sugar, and hyper arousal of many internal organs and functions. The individual will notice elevated heart rate, tense
musculature, rapid respiration, and a variety of intense emotional states. This adaptive response prepares the
individual to flee or fight the threat. In ideal circumstances the threat passes and the individual can return to a more
relaxed psycho-physiological state.
In modern human society, however, the individual is exposed to chronically stressful work and family
environments, the individual perseverates in thinking about the problems, and neither mind nor body return to the
original resting state. This is the basis for many functional medical and psychiatric disorders. The body and mind
enter a state of fatigue, exhaustion, and loss of adaptability. Many of specific components in the stress response have
a temporary adaptive effect, but a debilitating effect over time. Under stress, for example, the pituitary releases
vasopressin, which contracts the walls of the arteries, raising blood pressure. Over time this vasoconstriction
contributes to chronic and life threatening hypertension. The immune system also can become depleted and unable to
protect one from disease.
More recent research has shown that the so-called stress response is really more complex than first
recognized. The autonomic nervous system does not respond as one single unit; rather a variety of divergent patterns
occur in different individuals, some for example, affecting the cardio-vascular system in various ways, others affecting
the upper or lower gastrointestinal tract, and others the musculoskeletal system. Both sympathetic and
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 10
parasympathetic nervous system activation patterns play a role in the multiple forms of the human stress response
(Gevirtz, 1996).
Herbert Benson (1975) established that just as there is a human stress response, with negative effects on the
body, there is also a relaxation response with a healing or restorative impact on the human physiology and mind.
Benson began by investigating transcendental meditation, and its effects on physiology. The effects were the exact
opposite of the stress response: a decrease in sympathetic activation, a reduction in stress hormone levels, lowered
heart rate and blood pressure, relaxed musculature, and emotional calm. Benson reviewed the literature on Eastern
meditation, Christian mysticism, and relaxation practices, and found that most approaches shared a common formula
with three elements: a quiet environment, cultivation of a passive mental attitude ("letting go"), and the use of a
mental device to focus attention. Benson then developed a non-religious form of meditation based on these three
elements, and discovered similar effects on quieting physiological arousal. Benson hypothesized that this "relaxation
response" (as he calls the psycho-physiological state), appears to underlie the beneficial effects of many schools of
Eastern and Western meditation, yoga, and relaxation skills training.
Benson's research showed the clinical benefits of cultivating the relaxation response: in lowered blood
pressure, reduced anxiety, smoke cessation, and reduced drug and alcohol dependence. The relaxation response
provides a conceptual framework for one of the major contributions of biofeedback. Providing immediate
physiological feedback enhances the acquisition of a relaxation response, with immediate benefits for a number of
functional medical disorders.
The Institutional History of Biofeedback
Academic departments of neurophysiology, physiological psychology, and sleep research, and a few medical
institutions such as the Veterans Administration and the Menninger Foundation supported much of the new research
on feedback mechanisms controlling physiological processes. Kenneth Gaarder identifies two critical meetings that
preceded the Santa Monica Conference and supported the networking that culminated in the Biofeedback Research
Society. First, an annual Veteran's Administration research meeting took place in Denver in 1968, and several
feedback researchers were in attendance: Thomas Budzynski, Kenneth Gaarder, Thomas Mulholland, Barry Sterman,
and Johann Stoyva. Then in April 1969 the American Association for Humanistic Psychology and the Menninger
Foundation co-sponsored a Conference on Altered States of Consciousness in Council Grove, Kansas, bringing
together researchers working on many aspects of consciousness in relation to health. The work reported at Council
Grove reflected the mood of the 1960's, including research on meditation, psychedelic drugs, mysticism and
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 11
extra-sensory perception. Elmer Green was one of the prime movers for the conference, and Barbara Brown, Kenneth
Gaarder, Joe Kamiya, Gardner Murphy, and Johann Stoyva were in attendance.
The Santa Monica Conference and the Biofeedback Research Society
In 1969 a triad of Kenneth Gaarder, Gardner Murphy, and Barbara Brown formed a core committee to
organize a single unifying conference to focus the growing interest in the concept of feedback. Several colleagues
encouraged and supported the concept of a larger conference and the establishment of a new scientific society.
Barbara Brown did most of the logistical work for the conference, set up the scientific program and later was elected as
the first President. The Conference ran from October 20-22, 1969, at the Surfrider Inn in Santa Monica.
The Conference program was organized into a series of research reports and panels on the following issues:
"Conditioning and the Control of Autonomic Functions, Muscle Feedback, EEG Feedback, Feedback and States of
Consciousness, Methodologies of Feedback, Feedback--Theory and the Future, Feedback Techniques in Experimental
Animals, and Clinical Applications of Feedback Concepts."
The word biofeedback was not listed anywhere in the program and one of the controversial issues of the
program was the debate over what to call this new research/treatment technique as well as what to call the
organization. The terms self-regulation, auto-regulation, and feedback were all proposed. Finally the technique of
"biofeedback" was named and the Biofeedback Research Society was formed.
The presenters listed in the program include John Basmajian, Barbara Brown, Thomas Budzynski, Leo Di
Cara, Les Fehmi, Elmer Green, Joe Kamiya, Thomas Mulholland, Gardner Murphy, Barry Sterman, Johann Stoyva,
Charles Tart, and George Whatmore, among others. Joe Kamiya observes that the group that gathered in Santa
Monica was fascinating in its diversity, ranging from "the hardest nosed operant conditioners to those in white robes."
The Eastern spiritual influences were strong, as was the humanistic emphasis on the unfolding of new levels of human
potential. The pursuit of Alpha cortical states as a pathway to spiritual awareness especially drew the interests of
transpersonal psychologists and meditators. Yet methodology and rigorous psychophysiological research received
equal emphasis. Biofeedback seemed to be a meeting point where high technology and the higher levels of
consciousness could meet.
After Santa Monica the broadly focused new Biofeedback Research Society continued to evolve, becoming
the Biofeedback Society of America in 1976, and the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback in
1988. The development of a panoply of clinical techniques for a variety of health problems increased the clinical
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 12
emphasis of the Society. A greater emphasis developed on research documenting clinical efficacy of biofeedback
techniques with a variety of clinical problems.
Biofeedback and Applied Psychophysiology Today
Today the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, headquartered in Wheat Ridge,
Colorado, supports a peer reviewed journal publishing scientific articles, and a newsmagazine, and fosters basic
scientific work by recognizing outstanding research papers at the annual conference. A variety of sections and interest
groups have developed within the Association for individuals pursuing special interests in: EEG feedback
(“neurofeedback”), surface EMG applications, technology, education, nursing, pediatric applications, respiratory
physiology, and applied psychophysiology in family medicine.
Diversity continues to characterize the organization, which remains multi-disciplinary and continues to
combine the poetic and the empirical in its annual programs. The 1996 annual meeting in Albuquerque, New Mexico
featured keynote speakers on: 1) the frontiers of brain imaging technology, 2) transpersonal medicine, 3) the
psychophysiology and behavioral treatment of hypertension, 4) the development and control of childhood asthma, 5)
recent advances in spinal cord rehabilitation, and 6) "Why do African Americans suffer illness and die at a higher rate
than other Americans?"
As this list of speakers illustrates, both the scientific foundations and the clinical breadth of the biofeedback
movement has grown steadily since 1969. The term biofeedback is frequently criticized as too narrow, since
biofeedback practitioners also engage in a variety of other treatment interventions, drawing on psychophysiological
principles, but without specific use of a biofeedback instrument. The concepts of applied psychophysiology, clinical
psychophysiology, and behavioral health may more broadly capture the spirit of the field today.
The majority of biofeedback practitioners today are health care providers involved in a daily clinical practice;
this includes physicians, psychologists, nurses, social workers, physical and occupational therapists, and several other
disciplines. Clinical biofeedback today offers a diversity of clinical procedures and protocols, with applications to a
wide range of disorders.
Today's vigorous EEG biofeedback movement, or neurotherapy movement, provides examples of the
diversity of today's clinical biofeedback: Many substance abuse therapists apply Eugene Peniston's treatment protocol
for training recovering alcoholics to produce higher magnitudes of alpha and theta brain activity, while utilizing
imagery techniques for self-transformation and rehabilitation (Peniston & Kulkoski, 1989). Other neurotherapist's
follow Joel Lubar's or Michael Tansey's protocols for training children with attention deficits to alter dominant brain
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 13
rhythms and enhance academic attention (Lubar, 1991). Others apply Barry Sterman's (1986) EEG protocols to
suppress convulsive neural activity and control epilepsy. Additional EEG applications and treatment protocols
emerge regularly for disorders ranging from multiple personality to closed head injury.
According to an AAPB publication (Shellenberger, Amar, Schneider, & Turner, 1994, pp. 2-3), the clinical
efficacy of biofeedback has been demonstrated for the following disorders: anxiety disorders, attention deficit and
hyperactivity, cerebral palsy, chronic pain, enuresis, epilepsy, essential hypertension, headache (migraine, mixed and
tension types), incontinence (fecal and urinary), insomnia, irritable bowel syndrome, motion sickness, myofascial pain
syndrome, neuromuscular disorders, rectal pain and rectal ulcer, raynaud's disease, rheumatoid arthritis pain, stroke,
and TMJ disorders.
In a recent publication Schwartz and Associates categorized biofeedback applications according to the
quality of outcome research supporting each application. Schwartz and Associates (1995, pp. 108-109) report that
abundant empirical research has demonstrated biofeedback's efficacy for the following disorders: tension-type
headache, migraine headache, raynaud’s disease, urinary and fecal incontinence, essential hypertension, nocturnal
enuresis, and dyschezia. At least some research supports good outcomes with: insomnia, anxiety disorders, chronic
pain, ADD and ADHD, functional nausea and vomiting, irritable bowel syndrome, motion sickness, asthma, bruxism
and TMD, tinnitus, phantom limb pain, and secondary Raynaud's symptoms. Additionally, there are case reports of
positive outcomes for biofeedback with: writer's cramp, esophogeal spasm, occupational cramps, blepharospasm,
dysmennorhea, visual disorders, some dermatologic disorders, diabetes mellitus, fibromyalgia, and menopausal hot
flashes,
Professional Standards
Today AAPB has a sister organization, the Biofeedback Certification Institute of America (BCIA), also
headquartered in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, which serves to assure the standards of care in the clinical practice of
biofeedback. BCIA has established a basic blueprint of knowledge and skills regarded as essential to the practice of
clinical biofeedback. BCIA now grants certification in three areas -- biofeedback, stress management, and eeg
biofeedback -- based on didactic educational pre-requisites, supervised personal training, supervised clinical practice,
and a comprehensive exam.
Biofeedback Today and the Search
for Human Potential
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 14
Several figures in the field have expressed a concern that biofeedback's transformation into a health
profession treating sick individuals has led the field astray from the original dream of a human being guided by
technology into a higher realization of human potential (Kamiya, 1994; Kall, 1994; Peper, 1996). According to Rob
Kall, the vision of biofeedback involves recreating wholeness, balance and health, rather than merely eliminating
symptoms. At its best, biofeedback "... opens people's vision, dissolves inner barriers, illuminates paths to greater
potential, opportunity, capacity for happiness, and ability to share with and contribute to others" (1994, p. 30).
The excitement of enhancing personal control and self-direction is never entirely lost even in the most
mundane clinical procedures. Clinicians frequently report that patient's utilizing biofeedback instruments have
repeated "Eureka" experiences: "You mean that when I change my thoughts, my heart slows down and my heart rate
and breathing come into balance," or "I can do it! I can warm my own hands with my own mind. And I don't ever have
to have headaches again."
Nevertheless, the critics remain justified in their concerns. The original visionaries never intended
biofeedback to be an entirely practical affair. Barbara Brown, a founder and first president of the Biofeedback
Research Society, proclaimed that biofeedback could give to the human being a New Mind and a New Body (1975).
Later she imaged this new mind as a Supermind, with expanded consciousness and unlimited potential (Brown, 1980).
Kenneth Pelletier showed that the mind can slay human health, but with the guidance of biofeedback, autogenic
training, and meditative practices this same human mind can become the basis for a new holistic and creative
adaptation for the healthy individual (1977).
If we are to be faithful to this original vision of Barbara Brown, Kenneth Pelletier, Elmer Green, and so many
others, it is essential that the approach, concepts, and techniques of biofeedback remain available for education,
spiritual discovery, self-awareness, and personal growth, and never become entirely medical. The biofeedback
research tradition remains a part of the humanistic quest for human freedom, self-regulation, and personal and spiritual
renewal.
References to Chapter Ten
(The author is grateful to Joe Kamiya, Kenneth Gaarder, and Francine Butler for assistance in drafting the historical
overview.)
Ancoli, , & Kamiya, J. (1978). Methodological issues in alpha biofeedback training. Biofeedback and
Self-Regulation, 3 (2), 159-183.
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 15
Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. NY: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.
Basmajian, J. V. (1967). Muscles alive: Their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore: Williams and
Wilkins.
Basmajian, J. V. (1979). Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Benson, H. (1975). The relaxation response. NY: William Morrow.
Brown, B. (1974). New mind, new body. NY: Harper & Row.
Brown, B. (1977). Stress and the art of biofeedback. NY: Harper & Row.
Brown, B. (1980). Supermind: The ultimate energy. NY: Harper & Row.
Budzynski, T. H., Stoyva, J. M., & Adler, C. (1970). Feedback induced muscle relaxation: Applications to tension
headache. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1, 1-14.
Butler, F. (1993, June). Personal correspondence.
Collins, R. W. (1973). Importance of the bladder-cue buzzer contingency in the conditioning treatment for enuresis.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82 (2), 299-308.
DeSilva, P. (1981). Two paradigmatic strands in the Buddhist theory of consciousness. In R. S. Valle & R. von
Eckartsberg (Eds.), The metaphors of consciousness (pp. 275-285). NY: Plenum.
Engel, B. T. (1973). Clinical applications of operant conditioning in the control of cardiac arrhythmias. Seminars in
Psychiatry , 5 (4), 433-438.
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 16
Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine, Science, 196, 129-136.
Fehmi, L. G., & Fritz, G. (1980, Spring). Open focus: The attentional foundation of health and well being. Somatics,
24-30.
Fehmi, L. G., & Selzer, F. (1980). Attention and biofeedback training in psychotherapy and transpersonal growth. In
S. Boorstein & K. Speeth (Eds.), Explorations in transpersonal psychotherapy (pp. 314-337). NY: Jason Aronson.
Fehmi, L. G. (in press). Attention to attention. In R. Kall (Ed.), Applied neurophysiology and brain biofeedback.
Trevose, PA: FUTUREHEALTH, Inc.
Fuller, G. D. (1977). Biofeedback: Methods and procedures in clinical practice. San Francisco: Biofeedback Press.
Gaarder, K. R., & Montgomery, P. S. (1977). Clinical biofeedback: A procedural manual. Baltimore: Williams and
Wilkins.
Gaarder, K. (1979). Unpublished manuscript on the founding of the Biofeedback Society of America.
Gevirtz, R. (Chair). (March, 1996). The stress response is not unidimensional. Symposium at the Annual Meeting of
the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Green, E. (1969). Feedback technique for deep relaxation. Psychophysiology, 6 (3), 371-377.
Green, E., Green, A. M., & Walters, E. D. (1970). Self-regulation of internal states. In J. Rose (Ed.), Progress of
cybernetics: Proceedings of the First International Congress of Cybernetics, London, September 1969 (pp.
1299-1318). London: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
Green, E., Green, A. M., & Walters, E. D. (1970). Voluntary control of internal states: Psychological and
physiological. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 2, 1-26.
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 17
Green, E., & Green, A. (1977). Beyond biofeedback. San Francisco: Delacorte Press.
Green, J., & Shellenberger, R. (1991). The dynamics of health and wellness: A biopsychosocial approach. Fort
Worth: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.
Jacobsen, E. (1938). Progressive relaxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kall, R. (1994, Summer). Heart, spirit and human potential section proposed for AAPB. Biofeedback
Newsmagazine, 22 (2), 30.
Kamiya, J. (1994, February). Personal correspondence.
Kamiya, J. (1969). Operant control of the EEG alpha rhythm. In C. Tart (Ed.), Altered states of consciousness. NY:
Wiley.
Ladad, A.; Whipple, B.; & Perry, J. D. (1981). The G spot and other recent discoveries about human sexuality. NY:
Holt, Rhinehart, & Winston.
Lazarus, R. S. (1990 a). Stress, coping, and illness. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Personality and disease. (pp. 97-120).
NY: Wiley.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. NY: Oxford University Press.
Lubar, J. F. (1989). Electroencephalographic biofeedback and neurological applications. In J. V. Basmajian (Ed.),
Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians (3rd ed.), pp. 67-90. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Lubar, J. F. (1991). Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback treatment for
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Biofeedback and Self-regulation, 16, 201-225.
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 18
Lubar, J. F., & Shouse, M. N. (1977). Use of biofeedback in the treatment of seizure disorders and hyperactivity. In B.
B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp. 203-265). NY: Plenum Press.
Miller, N. E. (1969). Learning of visceral and glandular responses. Science, 163, 434-445.
Miller, N. E. (1978). Biofeedback and visceral learning. Annual review of psychology, 29, 373-404.
Miller, N. E., & DiCara, L. (1967). Instrumental learning of heart rate changes in curarized rats: Shaping and
specificity to discriminative stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63, 12-19.
Miller, N. E., & Dworkin, B. (1974). Visceral learning: Recent difficulties with curarized rats and significant
problems for human research. In P. A. Obrist; A. H. Black, J. Brener, & L. V. DiCara (Ed.), Cardiovascular
psychophysiology (pp. 312-331). NY: Aldine.
Moss, D. (1994, March). Twenty-five years of biofeedback and applied psychophysiology. In D. Moss (Ed.),
Twenty-fifth anniversary yearbook (pp. 3-6). Wheat Ridge, CO: Association for Applied Psychophysiology and
Biofeedback.
Moss, D., & Keen, E. (1981). The nature of consciousness. In R. S. Valle & R. von Eckartsberg (Eds.), The
metaphors of consciousness (pp. 107-120). NY: Plenum.
Moss, D., Kasman, G., & Fogel, E. (Eds.). (1996). Physical medicine and rehabilitation (Special Issue).
Biofeedback Newsmagazine, 24 (3).
Mowrer, O. H., & Mowrer, W. M. (1938). Enuresis: A method for its study and treatment. American Journal of
Orthopsychiatry, 8, 436-459.
Patel, C. (1975). 12 month follow up of yoga and biofeedback in the management of hypertension. Lancet, 1, 62-65.
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 19
Pelletier, K. R. (1977). Mind as healer, mind as slayer. NY: Delta.
Peniston, E. G., & Kukolski, P. J. (1989). Alpha-theta brainwave training and beta-endorphin levels in alcoholics.
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 13, 271-279.
Peper, E. (1994, November). The future of applied psychophysiology. Panel discussion at the Midwestern Regional
Conference on Behavioral Medicine and Biofeeedback, Grand Rapids, MI.
Perry, J. D.; & Talcott, L. B. (1988, May). The bastardization of Dr. Kegel's exercises. Presentation to the Northeast
Gerontological Society, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Perry, J. D., & Talcott, L. B. (1989, March). The Kegel perineometer: Biofeedback twenty years before its time.
Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, San Diego,
California.
Sargent, J. D., Walters, E. D., & Green, E. E. (1973). Psychosomatic self-regulation of migraine headaches.
Seminars in Psychiatry, 5 (4): 415-427.
Schultz, J., & Luthe, W. (1959). Autogenic therapy. NY: Grune and Stratton.
Schwartz, M., & Associates. (1987). Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide. NY: Guilford.
Schwartz, M., & Associates. (2nd edition, 1995). Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide. NY: Guilford.
Shellenberger, R., Amar, P., Schneider, P., & Turner, J. (1994). Clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of
biofeedback therapy. Guidelines for third party reimbursement. AAPB: Wheat Ridge.
Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. NY: McGraw Hill.
Chapter 10, Biofeedback, Page 20
Skinner, B. F. (1969). The contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. NY: Appleton Century-Crofts.
Sterman, M. B. (1986). Epilepsy and its treatment with EEG feedback therapy. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 8,
21-25.
Tart, C. (Ed.). (1969). Altered states of consciousness. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Whatmore, G. B., & Kohli, D. R. (1968). Dysponesis: A neurophysiological factor in functional disorders.
Behavioral Science, 13 (1), 102-124.
Whatmore, G. B., & Kohli, D. R. (1974). The physiopathology and treatment of functional disorders. NY: Grune and
Stratton.
Whitehead, W. E. (1995, March/April). Biofeedback benefits patients with stress and urge incontinence. The
National Psychologist, 8B, 11.
Whitehead, W. E., & Drossman, D. A. (1996). Biofeedback for disorders of elimination: Fecal incontinence and
pelvic floor dyssynergia. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27 (3), 234-240.
Wickramasekera, I., Davies, T. E., & Davies, S. M. (1996). Applied psychophysiology: A bridge between the
biomedical model and the biopsychosocial model in family medicine. Professional Psychology: Research and
Practice, 27 (3), 221-233.
Wolpe, J., & Lazarus, A. A. (1966). Behavior therapy techniques. NY: Pergamom Press.
... Indeed, in the Biofeedback therapy the patients are connected to electrical sensors that help into receive information (feedback) about body patients (bio). Previous data have shown in a follow-up study an increase in long-term abstinence after HRV-biofeedback for alcohol dependence in addition to rehabilitation (109,110). Further, other works have used biofeedback therapy in AUD individuals with positive outcomes. (108,111). ...
Article
Full-text available
Alcohol use disorders (AUD) are among the most common and undertreated mental disorders in developed countries. The co-occurrence of psychiatric comorbidity and AUD has already been well documented. Moreover, alexithymia was found associated with heavy drinking and alcohol dependence. A large part of AUD individuals, between 45 and 67%, have been identified as alexithymics. Both psychiatric comorbidity and alexithymia can negatively impact the course of recovery from alcohol. Alcohol consumption has also been shown to significantly influence autonomic responses. Chronic use of alcohol may induce significant changes in heart rate variability, respiratory frequency, electrodermal activity and skin temperature. To date, only a few studies have comprehensively investigated the comorbidity of alexithymia in AUD individuals with dual diagnosis. Thus, the aim and also the novelty of the present investigation were to disclose in individuals with AUD the emotional and cognitive stress responses to selected physiological parameters measured by ProComp5 Infiniti™ encoder in AUD patients suffering alexithymia with or without concomitant dual diagnosis. Quite interestingly, in AUD subjects with concomitant dual diagnosis we found that the alexithymia elevated skin temperature, heart rate variability and decreased respiratory frequency. Alexithymia, if associated with the dual diagnosis condition in AUD individuals, can be considered as a further vulnerability factor to stressing factors, impacting psychosomatic processing and inducing alterations in physiological parameters. In this paper, we discuss the implications of these findings in the early treatment of alexithymic AUD individuals.
... In an article that chronicles the history of the movement, Donald Moss (1998) describes as follows the meeting that led to the creation of the first research society that studied biofeedback: "the group that gathered in Santa Monica was fascinating in its diversity, ranging from 'the hardest nosed operant conditioners to those in white robes.' The Eastern spiritual influences were strong, as was the humanistic emphasis on the unfolding of new levels of human potential. ...
Article
This article examines a collection of “cybertrance” devices, originating in the 1960s and 1970s. These devices are based on the reappropriation of instruments from the academic world in order to place users in modified states of consciousness. They draw on the heritage of American cybernetics, and its mechanical philosophy, in order to explore what is machine-like in man. Their goal is to create unprecedented forms of experience by coupling body and machine, disturbing one by the other. The analysis focuses on the trajectories of objects, the circulation between theoretical elements from cybernetics and their technological reinterpretation in countercultural circles. Four ranges of devices are examined: the immersive multimedia installations of psychedelic culture, the flicker and its physiological effects, biofeedback devices, and the digital translations, in the world of computing, of these first analogical devices.
... Mindfulness and paced breathing exercises have been used for over a millennium for relaxation, and what is called the "mind-body technique" claims to influence the physical health (Moss, 1999). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
Heart rate variability (HRV) has received much attention lately. It has been shown that HRV can be used to monitor the autonomic nervous system and to detect autonomic dysfunction, especially vagal dysfunction. Reduced HRV is associated with several diseases and has also been suggested as a predictor of poor outcomes and sudden cardiac death. HRV is, however, not yet widely accepted as a clinical tool and is mostly used for research. Advances in neuroimmunity with an improved understanding of the link between the nervous and immune systems have opened a new potential arena for HRV applications. An example is when systemic inflammation and autoimmune disease are primarily caused by low vagal activity; it can be detected and prognosticated by reduced HRV. This thesis is the result of several technical development steps and exploratory research where HRV is applied as a prognostic diagnostic tool with preventive potential. The main objectives were 1) to develop an affordable tool for the effective analysis of HRV, 2) to study the correlation between HRV and pro-inflammatory markers and the potential degree of activity in the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, and 3) to develop a biofeedback application intended for support of personal capability to increase the vagal activity as reflected in increased HRV. Written as a compilation thesis, the methodology and the results of each study are presented in each appended paper. In the thesis frame/summary chapter, a summary of each of the included papers is presented, grouped by topic and with their connections. The summary of the results shows that the developed tools may accurately register and properly analyse and potentially influence HRV through the designed biofeedback game. HRV can be used as a prognostic tool, not just in traditional healthcare with a focus on illness but also in wellness. By using these tools for the early detection of decreased HRV, prompt intervention may be possible, enabling the prevention of disease. Gamification and serious gaming is a potential platform to motivate people to follow a routine of exercise that might, through biofeedback, improve HRV and thereby health.
... Biofeedback is a technique that makes internal bodily mechanisms, that would otherwise be imperceptible, become manifest as audio or visual data [Moss, 1998]. By using analogue and digital sensors it is possible to track electrical and acoustic signals from the human body and then transform those signals into visual (visualization) or auditive information (sonification). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
The introduction chapter describes the scope and purpose of this book and summarizes key topics regarding online therapy. We explain that the book addresses most of the main approaches and schools of psychotherapy that are prevalent in the therapeutic field nowadays. Thus, in addition to exploring how each of them adjust to online therapy, we also have created a collection of the most practiced therapeutic approaches nowadays. Beyond the theories, we describe why flexibility and creativity are among the main factors that contribute to the success of online therapy. Also discussed briefly are skills and training required for the successful provision of online therapy. The introduction also presents the current research about online therapeutic alliance, elements influencing the therapeutic alliance such as the setting and rupture and repair, and the outcome of online therapy. We show that there is enough evidence that online therapy is beneficial no less than in-person. We address the question whether it is suitable for everyone, and summarize how the factors that unify all psychodynamic approaches can be applied online.
Research
Full-text available
Abstract As per reports of world Health Organization, stress is a major problem of any times and affects both physical as well as the mental health of people. This study aimed to investigate the application of music therapy technique to reduce the stress. In this study, a proposed framework has to be deployed for stress monitoring in health care.
Chapter
Depression is a serious disorder, affecting 12 % of adult males and 25 % of adult females in the United States, and approximately 121 million people worldwide. Depression frequently progresses to a chronic condition, often producing disability. The social, economic, and medical costs are substantial. Depression has a strong heritability, based on a polygenic transmission. Environmental factors contribute substantially to the onset, maintenance, and chronicity of depression, in the form of depressed parents, social learning, stressful life events, separation and loss, and psychological trauma. Pathways approaches to healing depression draw on nutrition, exercise, social support, imagery, psychotherapy, and a variety of mind-body and complementary therapies.
Article
Full-text available
Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) as applied by behavioral scientists includes strategies for changing negative cognitions that contribute to depression and anxiety. Biofeedback is a useful strategy to demonstrate to clients the mind (cognitive, psychological) to body (physiological) interaction. For example, a cognitive, psychological reaction to a stimuli results in a physiological effects as illustrated by changes in skin conductance or muscle tension. A case example is used to demonstrate an anticipatory psychophysiological response resulting in covert activity of the forearm as a client simply imagines playing the piano.
Chapter
IntroductionParadigms in Biofeedback Assisted Optimal Performance WorkThe Field of Optimal Performance PsychophysiologyA Brief HistoryBiofeedback Tools for Optimal Performance: ModalitiesStandards for ApplicationProfessional ResourcesConclusion References
Chapter
The philosophical and psychological reflections of early Buddhism1 as found in the discourses of the Buddha provide an interesting base to examine some of the contemporary controversies in psychological theory. In fact, the Buddha himself, who was confronted by numerous philosophers and debaters, betrayed a significant sophistication regarding the kind of conceptual framework one should use when discussing the nature of human consciousness. In a sustained criticism of 62 theories regarding man and the universe, the Buddha (Digha Nikaya, Sutta 1) considers his own position as a kind of “razor’s edge” which will steer clear of certain theoretical pitfalls like eternalism and annihilationism, materialism and idealism, determinism and indeterminism, and value relativism and value absolutism.
Chapter
Since the advent of the phenomenological movement in philosophy and psychology, phenomenology has been synonymous with a concern for the contents and structure of consciousness. Husserl, the founder of phenomenological philosophy, regarded consciousness—“that wonder of wonders”—as the primary theme for phenomenological inquiry.
Chapter
During the past 15 years, considerable basic research and applied effort has been directed toward developing methods for controlling internal physiological processes. These processes include autonomic functions, both unit and gross (summated) neuromuscular activity, and central neural electrophysiological responses, all of which may be modifiable through the application of behavioral methods. Psychophysiology is the discipline most concerned with this type of research. A relatively new applied branch of psychophysiology, now known as biofeedback, is undergoing rapid development to fulfill basic research and clinical needs related to the control of physiological processes.
Chapter
Open Focus attention training and brain wave synchrony training combine to impact a process which is fundamental to every aspect and function of our lives,that is, how we pay attention. The way one pays attention is directly correlated with brain wave activity, and both significantly impact experience and performance: “in-to-it,” broad-scoped attention is associated with brain wave synchrony and effortless performance; remote, narrow-focused attention is associated with desynchronized brain wave activity and effortful performance. Attention training and brain synchrony biofeedback training guide one toward an awareness which is immersed in experience at the same time that it is objectively witnessesing that experience; an awareness that is narrowed on detail, simultaneously panoramic in scope and bathed in an effortless sense of this moment. Recent research shows that Open Focus and biofeedback training, individually and together, improve concentration, increase intellectual and athletic performance, and reduce a variety of stressrelated physical symptoms. An example Open Focus exercise is presented in the appendix so that interested readers may practice the technique.