Article

Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses

Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability (Impact Factor: 0.69). 02/2014; DOI: 10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5

ABSTRACT

While feedback is a key factor for improving student learning, little is known about how students understand and experience feedback within the classroom. This study analysed 193 New Zealand primary and secondary students’ survey responses alongside drawings of their understandings and experiences of feedback to examine how they experience, understand, and respond to feedback. It found that despite New Zealand’s strong commitment to student-centred Assessment for Learning practices, the majority of students still drew, selected, and endorsed teacher-led feedback practices, with pictures dominated by written comments or grades. However, they generally depicted and described this feedback as positive and constructive, suggesting that negative emotional responses to evaluative comments and grades may be lessened if students perceive such feedback will help them improve.

1 Follower
 · 
82 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Peer- and self-assessment (PASA) can lead to increased student self-regulation and achievement. However, few studies have examined the content of the feedback students in primary and secondary schools provide themselves and their peers. This study used Hattie and Timperley’s task, process, self-regulation and self feedback categories from their Review of Educational Research article ‘The power of feedback’ to (1) examine the content of a sample of naturally occurring student-written PASA comments (n = 471 utterances) and (2) explore the feasibility of using this model with student-generated feedback. Students provided primarily task feedback to both themselves and their peers, with self-regulation feedback only found in self-assessment. Students in higher grades tended to provide more task and process feedback, while giving less self feedback during self-assessment and more during peer assessment. More refinement of the model is recommended for both research and professional development purposes to better capture the quality and complexity of student-led feedback comments.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2014 · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigates the effects of prompting on secondary students’ written peer feedback in chemistry investigation reports. In particular, we examined students’ feedback features in relation to the use of criteria, feedback specificity, and feedback levels. A quasi-experimental pre-test post-test design was adopted. Reviewers in the prompted condition were provided with question prompts that asked them to pose written feedback to their peers on what they did or did not do well and suggestions for improvement, while reviewers in the unprompted condition gave written peer feedback without prompts. The findings showed that prompted peer feedback has a significant effect on the number of comments related to Knowledge of errors, Suggestions for improvement and Process level feedback. This study supports the view that prompting peer feedback in the use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels opens up opportunity for reviewers to engage more meaningfully with peer feedback in report writing tasks.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2014 · Instructional Science
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper evaluates various feedback models utilised for summative assessment tasks for tertiary digital media students at the University of South Australia in Australia. The aim of this research project was to establish the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, and to determine which model provided students with more insight into their academic performance. In the first half of 2014, in the course Design Language in Media Arts, three different summative feedback models were trialled: written feedback; audio feedback; and video feedback. 77 first year students participated in the learning experiment where a different feedback model was utilised for each of the three major assignments in the course. The three summative feedback techniques were evaluated at the end of the semester in the form of an online survey, which provided participating students with the opportunity to critically reflect on the learning experience. The findings of the study are discussed in light of the growing use of non-traditional feedback measures in higher education, and provide insight into the advantages and disadvantages of each model, from both student and staff perspectives. © 2015, Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Inc. All rights reserved.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2015 · Issues in Educational Research

Full-text

Download
82 Reads
Available from
May 31, 2014