ArticlePDF Available

Unusual ignition of a bullet causing hand injury: Case report

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Gun-cleaning accidents occur rarely. Gun-cleaning mistakes can cause accidents and even fatalities. The most dangerous type of gun-cleaning mistake is forgetting to check that the gun is loaded. A 35 year–old man was admitted to emergency department with a complaint of injury related to the third web space, third finger pulp and thenar region of right hand. On detailed questioning, he reported that he was cleaning a machine gun (type MG-3) after target practice in a shooting range. He didn’t check visually and physically whether there were any bullets or not in the chamber. The remaining bullet in the chamber was fired during the cleaning process when he pushed the rod through the barrel. All of the wounds were washed with antimicrobial solution. The defect of the third finger pulp was repaired with local flap. Lacerations relevant to the third web space and hypothenar region were sutured and the defect of soft tissue of the thenar region was repaired with skin graft. All of the wounds were healed on postoperative 15th day. If security measures followed explicitly and tightly, will ensure firearms’ safety and reduce accidents. In the case presented here we aimed attention to a rare injury caused by unusual ignition of a bullet during gun-cleaning. There is no reported injury presenting similar mechanism of ours’.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Accepted Manuscript
Title: Unusual ignition of a bullet causing hand injury: Case
report
Author: Abdul Kerim Yapici Salim Kemal Tuncer Umit
Kaldirim Ibrahim Arziman Mehmet Toygar
PII: S1572-3461(13)00024-X
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.015
Reference: INEXT 818
To appear in: Injury Extra
Received date: 28-9-2013
Revised date: 8-11-2013
Accepted date: 10-11-2013
Please cite this article as: Yapici AK, Tuncer SK, Kaldirim U, Arziman I, Toygar M,
Unusual ignition of a bullet causing hand injury: case report, Injury Extra (2013),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.015
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
Page 1 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
1
Unusual ignition of a bullet causing hand injury: case report
Abdul Kerim Yapici M.D. (*)
Salim Kemal Tuncer M.D. (**)
Umit Kaldirim M.D. (**)
Ibrahim Arziman M.D. (**)
Mehmet Toygar M.D. (***)
* Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy,
Ankara / Turkey
** Department of Emergency Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara / Turkey
*** Department of Forensic Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara / Turkey
Corresponding Author:
Abdul Kerim Yapici, M.D.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy,
Ankara/Turkey
Phone: +90 312 304 5408
Fax: +90 312 304 5404
E-mail: dryapici@hotmail.com
Page 2 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
2
Abstract
Gun-cleaning accidents occur rarely. Gun-cleaning mistakes can cause accidents and even
fatalities. The most dangerous type of gun-cleaning mistake is forgetting to check that the gun
is loaded.
A 35 year–old man was admitted to emergency department with a complaint of injury related
to the third web space, third finger pulp and thenar region of right hand. On detailed
questioning, he reported that he was cleaning a machine gun (type MG-3) after target practice
in a shooting range. He didn’t check visually and physically whether there were any bullets or
not in the chamber. The remaining bullet in the chamber was fired during the cleaning
process when he pushed the rod through the barrel.
All of the wounds were washed with antimicrobial solution. The defect of the third finger
pulp was repaired with local flap. Lacerations relevant to the third web space and hypothenar
region were sutured and the defect of soft tissue of the thenar region was repaired with skin
graft. All of the wounds were healed on postoperative 15th day. If security measures followed
explicitly and tightly, will ensure firearms’ safety and reduce accidents. In the case presented
here we aimed attention to a rare injury caused by unusual ignition of a bullet during gun-
cleaning. There is no reported injury presenting similar mechanism of ours’.
Key words:
Firearm, gun-cleaning accident, hand injury
Page 3 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
3
Introduction
The incidence of firearm related non-fatal and fatal accidents has increased worldwide (1-5).
Most of firearm accidents result often due to human errors included extreme carelessness
while handling, carrying or storing a loaded firearm (3). Most of the unintentional or
intentional nonfatal gunshot injuries involve an extremity (6). Most gunshot injuries to the
hand are result of low-velocity handguns (7). While low-energy firearm injuries are caused by
small caliber hand guns, BB (ball bearing) guns and zip guns, high energy firearm injuries are
caused by high caliber handguns or assault rifles (8).
Gun-cleaning accidents occur rarely. All firearms are being cleaned periodically and gun-
cleaning mistakes can cause accidents and even fatalities (5). The most dangerous type of
gun-cleaning mistake is forgetting to check whether it is loaded or not, before attempting to
clean the gun (9). The MG3 is a German general-purpose machine gun and is a short recoil-
operated, belt-fed, heavy-barreled, air-cooled machine gun suitable for bursts and sustained
fire. The weapon and its derivatives have also been acquired by the armed forces of over 30
countries (10). We report a case with gunshot wound to the hand caused by ignition of a bullet
while the cleaning a MG3 barrel with gun cleaning rod. In this study, the circumstances
accompanying these injuries, and preventive measures are discussed. These injuries are
preventable, and therefore, some basic measures may reduce the incidence of accidental
injury during gun cleaning procedure.
Case report
A 35 year–old man was admitted to emergency department with a complaint of injury related
to the third web space, third finger pulp and thenar region of right hand. On detailed
questioning, he reported that he was cleaning a machine gun (type MG-3) after target practice
Page 4 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
4
in a shooting range. He didn’t check visually and physically whether there were any bullets or
not in the chamber. The remaining bullet in the chamber was ignited during the cleaning
process when he pushed the rod through the barrel (Figure 1).
In the physical examination, on his right hand, there were 1.5x1.5 cm full thickness skin
defect on pulp of the third finger accompanying bone exposition on ground, 3x2.5 cm full
thickness skin defect on thenar region, 1 cm depth laceration on third web space from volar to
dorsal and multiple superficial lacerations on volar region (Figure 2). All digits were well
perfused. Neurological findings and motor functions of all digits were within normal range.
There was no fracture on X-ray. All of the wounds were washed with antimicrobial solution
(11). Lacerations relevant to the third web space, hypothenar region and the other multiple
small lacerations of the hand were sutured and the defect of soft tissue of the thenar region
was covered with full thickness skin graft prepared from the severed skin of pulp (Figure 3).
Cast immobilization was applied and intravenous prophylactic antibiotic was administered
postoperatively. All of the wounds were healed on postoperative 15th day and he proceeded
to physiotherapy program after the sutures removed. Patient were seen in outpatient clinic in
every month for 12 months. To prevent development of hypertrophic scar, pomade including
silicone (Dermatix® Silicone Gel) was prescribed (12-13). At the end of the follow-up period
we not encountered any hypertrophic scar development in both primer sutured and grafted
areas. Active and passive range of motion for all fingers was fully achived followed by
physiotherapy program (Figure 4). Patient had fully satisfied with good functionality of his
dominant hand in his daily life and job activity.
Page 5 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
5
Discussion
All firearms, undergoing mechanical abrasion in the course of time, must be maintained
periodically. Improperly maintained or unmaintained firearms become increasingly less
reliable (9). Firearm cleaning is paramount to ensure safety, accuracy, and longer firearm life.
Guns used for hunting should be cleaned before and after each season. Guns for other uses
such as target shooting or defense should be cleaned routinely to ensure they are ready when
needed. The cleaning rod is used to wipe, scrub and lubricate the bore and each function
requires a special end, attached to the rod. Cleaning rod must be in appropriate length for
cleaned weapon (14).
Safety is an issue that should concern all firearms holders. Accidents occurred during regular
maintenance are so-called “Gun-cleaning accident”. Gun-cleaning accident originated from
the personal negligence rather than a technical defect (5). The first rule for cleaning a firearm
is to ensure that it is definitely unloaded. It is checked that there is no ammunition in the
chamber or in the magazine. As in our case, he didn’t check the machine gun before cleaning
and then the remaining bullet in the chamber was ignited when he pushed the cleaning rod
through the barrel.
When a weapon is fired, the firing pin strikes the center of the primer cup, compressing the
primer composition between the cup and anvil and causing the composition to explode. The
vents in the anvil allow the flame to pass through the flash hole(s) into the cartridge case and
thereby igniting the propellant (15). It did not shoot when trigger was pulled but the
remaining bullet in the chamber was ignited when it was pushed by the rod through the barrel.
After being ignited, bullet pushed the cleaning rod too fast and the rod caused his hand to be
injured. There is no direct contact with bullet. To our best knowledge, there is no reported
injury presenting similar mechanism of ours’.
Page 6 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
6
Gunshot injuries to the hand can be classified according to the energy of the missile, the
location of the injury, and the tissue types injured (8). These classification patterns are helpful
for determining proper treatment modalities of gunshot injuries to the hand. However, each
injury must be evaluated on an individual basis. As the weapon is a machine gun, it is
normally more likely to cause a high energy injury even resulting in death. The case presented
here is an exception as he is injured only by the cleaning rod but not the bullet itself. But all
persons who are taking care of firearms should be aware of this problem as the different barrel
angle could be fatal for the cleaning person.
Low-velocity gunshot wounds usually involve only the skin, subcutaneous and/or muscle
tissue, and minor cortical bone fragments (7). Although most low-velocity gunshot wounds to
the hand can be closed primarily under some conditions, this is not recommended in high–
velocity injuries because of involving multiple tissue types such as skin, muscle, bone and
joint, and nerve (6). High velocity gunshot wounds require immediate irrigation, removal of
foreign bodies, skeletal stabilization, intravenous antibiotics, serial debridement, and
secondary wound closure within 5 to 7 days after injury followed by timely postoperative
rehabilitation. Low-velocity gunshot wounds are usually treated with local wound care
consisting of superficial irrigation and careful cleansing, cast immobilization, a short course
of oral or intravenous antibiotics, and close follow-up (7). In our case, there was no fracture
on X-ray. Soft tissue defects on the hand were repaired with local flap, skin graft and primary
suturation and cast immobilization was applied in resting position.
Gunshot injuries occurred during cleaning and maintenance procedure is rare but may be
fatal. Injuries to the limbs may cause disability. Unplanned discharge of a firearm is caused by
a failure to observe basic safety rules. To avoid such unexpected and undesirable events,
obeying basic safety rules before cleaning and maintenance procedure is mandatory.
Verifying the gun is unloaded is a must before beginning the cleaning session. Visual and
Page 7 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
7
physical inspection of the chamber, receiver, and magazine must be performed to ensure that
they are free of ammunition. Pointing the gun in a safe direction and dry firing it is an
additional safety measure. Removing all ammunition from the work area and taking nothing
for granted should be provided (14). If security measures followed explicitly and tightly, will
ensure firearms safety and reduce accidents.
Page 8 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
8
References
1. Eber GB, Annest JL, Mercy JA, Ryan GW. Nonfatal and fatal firearm-related
injuries among children aged 14 years and younger: United States, 1993-2000.
Pediatrics. 2004;113:1686-92.
2. Chapdelaine A, Samson E, Kimberley MD, Viau L. Firearm-related injuries in
Canada: issues for prevention. CMAJ. 1991;145:1217-23.
3. Karger B, Billeb E, Koops E. Accidental firearm fatalities. Forensic and
preventive implications. Int J Legal Med. 2002;116:350-3.
4. Langley JD, Marshall SW, Norton RN. Nonfatal firearm injuries in New
Zealand, 1979-1992. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:170-5.
5. Pereira C, Boyd JB, Olsavsky A, Gelfand M, Putnam B. Outcomes of complex
gunshot wounds to the hand and wrist: a 10-year level I urban trauma center
experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:374-7.
6. Rodrigues RL, Sammer DM, Chung KC. Treatment of complex below-the-
elbow gunshot wounds. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:122-7.
7. Dicpinigaitis PA, Koval KJ, Tejwani NC, Egol KA. Gunshot wounds to the
extremities. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2006;64:139-55.
8. Wilson RH. Gunshots to the hand and upper extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
2003; 408:133-44.
9. http://www.wikihow.com/Maintain-a-Pistol-(Handgun). (Accessed date: 04, 04
2013)
Page 9 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
9
10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheinmetall_MG3#External_links (Accessed date:
05, 04 2013)
11. Walker SR, Anderson T. A Study of Methods Used to Reduce Surgical Site
Infections. Arch Clin Exp Surg. 2012; 1(1): 27-33.
12. Karagoz H, Sever C, Bayram Y, Sahin C, Kulahci Y, Ulkur E. A Review of
the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars: Part I Clinical Aspects. Arch
Clin Exp Surg. 2012; 1(4): 237-248.
13. Karagoz H, Bayram Y, Sever C, Sahin C, Kulahci Y, Ulkur E. A Review of
the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars: Part II. Experimental Studies.
Arch Clin Exp Surg. 2013; 2(1): 49-58.
14. http://www.kleen-bore.com/safetytips.html (Accessed date: 05, 04 2013)
15. Vincent J. M. Di Maio, Gunshot Wounds: Practical Aspects of Firearms,
Ballistics, and Forensic Techniques. Firearms and Ammunition. 1999.
Page 10 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
10
Figure Legends
Figure 1
Gunshot wound to the hand caused by ignition of a bullet while pushing gun cleaning rod
during cleaning a MG3 barrel with rod
Figure 2
The wounded hand on admission
Figure 3
Postoperative image of the hand
Figure 4
All the wounds were healed at follow-up
Page 11 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 1
Page 12 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 2
Page 13 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 3
Page 14 of 14
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 4
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The understanding of the pathophysiological events of wound healing is very important to carry out Objective: To evaluate the changes in the number of Langerhans Cells (LC) observed in the e the prevention or treatment of hypertrophic scars. Wound healing is a complex process consisting of tshmeokverlelaspsptoinbgaecvceon(tsS,LaTnd-inthdeurcesdea)rlcehseiorsnhs.avefocusedonthepathophysiologyofthescarforma- tMione.thThoedpsu:rMpoicserosfctohpisicarsteiclteioisntsofreovmiewbitohpesriecsecnatrerxiepderoimuteintatlhsetubduiecscabl mouutchoyspaeortfrotwphenictsycparast,ien and to analyze the substances focused on by recent experimental studies. chronic users of smokeless tobacco (SLT), were utilized. For the control group, twenty non-SLT We analyzed the researches for new hopeful treatment modalities as well as the substances that are with normal mucosa were selected. The sections were studied with routine coloring and were im important to wound healing in the second part of this extensive review. The researchers have tried to for S-100, CD1a, Ki-67 and p63. These data were statistically analyzed by the Student’s t-test to in find a way to scarless wound healing, and it seems likely that new therapies will be available within differences in the expression of immune markers in normal mucosa and in SLT-induced leukop the next few years.
Article
Full-text available
The therapeutic management of hypertrophic scars remains challenging. Numerous methods have chronic users of smokeless tobacco (SLT), were utilized. For the control group, twenty non-SLT been described for the treatment of hypertrophic scars but, to date, the optimal treatment method with normal mucosa were selected. The sections were studied with routine coloring and were im has not been established. The aim of this review is to discuss the therapeutic modalities in the light of for S-100, CD1a, Ki-67 and p63. These data were statistically analyzed by the Student’s t-test to in current literature, and to guide regarding the choice of treatment methods for physicians. The surgi- differences in the expression of immune markers in normal mucosa and in SLT-induced leukop cal and non-surgical treatment and prevention methods of the hypertrophic scars were reviewed and Results: There was a significant difference in the immunolabeling of all markers between nor some recommendations for physicians who try to treat or prevent the hypertrophic scar were devel- and SLT-induced lesions (p<0.001). The leukoplakia lesions in chronic SLT users demonstrated oped under cover of current literature and our personal experiences. A lot of therapeutic modalities increase in the number of Langerhans cells and in the absence of epithelial dysplasia. have been described for the hypertrophic scars so far, but there is no absolute curative method alone. ThCoenmcolustsiaopnpr:oThprieatiencmreathseodinotrhme netuhmodbsershoofuthldesbecsellescrtepdraecsceonrtdsitnhgetiontithiaelpsatatigeento’sf lneeuekdospalnadkia. pKroeypewrtoierdsos:ftShmeosckaerle.sThsteobthaeccraop,liesutskcoapnlabkeincelefistiofrnosm,caonucrere,vlaienwgewrhaenstcheellys,scehlecwtitnhgetmoboasctcaop.propri- ate method or methods for treatment of hypertrophic scars.
Article
Gunshot injuries to the hand and upper extremity have been studied during military conflicts and in urban settings. Treatment concepts include identification of injured structures, aggressive surgical wound care, and reconstruction of important functional structures. There are various types of missile injuries. For simplicity, low-energy injuries imply limited damage, and require only conservative approaches. High-energy injuries are complicated by significant tissue destruction, rehabilitation dilemmas, and uncertain outcomes. The surgeon must recognize the anatomic complexity of the hand and proceed with caution. Most gunshot injuries to the hand involve a combination of tissue types. Bone injury is dramatic and is seen radiographically. However, injury to the soft tissue including skin, tendon, blood vessel, and nerve also must be appreciated. Individually, the tissues have varied function and properties of healing. Therefore, the challenge is to prioritize the injury, select an aggressive surgical approach, and integrate a suitable rehabilitation plan.
Article
Objective: Surgical site infections (SSI) remain a cause for concern. The aim of this audit was to assess current practise in an Australian Teaching Hospital when compared to guidelines issued by NICE (UK). Methods: A prospective audit of cases passing through the operating theater complex of a teaching hospital over four weeks. Practise was assessed against criteria designed to reduce the incidence of SSI. Results: 570 surgical cases were analyzed. In 126 cases (22%), hair was removed pre-operatively, 84% via clippers and 15% via razor. There was a large variation in the type of skin preparation used, with aqueous betadine/iodine being the most common (377 cases). In 340 cases (61%), the skin preparation was allowed to dry prior to skin incision. In 161 cases, an occlusive drape was used (28%). 339 patients (59%) received prophylactic antibiotics. The appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis was reviewed in relation to local guidelines. In the 238 cases where the timing of the antibiotics was recorded, the mean time prior to incision was 18 mins (the range was 180 minutes to 15 minutes after the incision). 248 patients had no active warming in theater. Their mean temperature on arrival in recovery was 36.6 and deg;C. 292 patients had active warming. Their mean body temperature on arrival in recovery was 36.7 and deg;C (Student T test p = 0.222, 95% confidence interval -0.137 to 0.032). Conclusion: In this hospital there was poor compliance when measured against the NICE recommendations. [Arch Clin Exp Surg 2012; 1(1.000): 27-33]
Article
To assess the consequences of gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the hand, we reviewed our 10-year experience at an urban level I trauma center. A retrospective review was performed on patients admitted with GSWs to the extremities between January 1, 1997 and January 1, 2007. Those with GSWs to the hand and wrist needing surgery were studied. A telephone survey supplemented the data. Of 1358 patients admitted with GSWs involving the upper extremities, 62 patients with complex hand and wrist injuries requiring operative intervention were identified. Most patients sustained low-velocity handgun injuries and presented within 12 hours of injury. In many individuals (97%), the gunshot injury to the hand or wrist was only part of a multiple gunshot assault. All patients underwent surgical debridement and repair followed by an early aggressive rehabilitation program. Mean length of hospital stay was 5.0 (±5.1) days, with 9.7% of patients requiring ICU care for 3.3 (±1.4) days, with an average cost of $47,819 (±$53,548) per patient. Although 65% of the individuals subsequently reported being "disabled from work" due to pain, the quality of life, and ultimate function was good in 61%, fair in 26.1%, and bad in 13%. GSWs to the hand and wrist are often part of multiple handgun wounds in one individual. Most produce comminuted fractures, seldom requiring bone grafts, fusion, or amputation. Vascular injuries, though rare, necessitate vein grafts due to loss of length. Few patients require free flaps, and few sustain nerve or tendon injuries. Most complain of pain or numbness. However, a good quality of life and a return to the activities of daily living occurred in two-third individuals.
Article
We reviewed the available data on firearm-related injuries in Canada to suggest strategies for prevention in the context of the proposed amendments to the Criminal Code (Bill C-17) currently before Parliament. The risk of death from a firearm in Canada is equivalent to the risk of death from a motor vehicle crash. We discuss the risks associated with firearms with regard to suicides, homicides and "accidents." We also discuss the accessibility of firearms. This article builds upon a recently published update on the epidemiologic basis of the public health approach for the prevention of firearm-related injuries and deaths. The key to the etiologic approach to preventing such injuries and deaths is to view the incidents, regardless of their medicolegal circumstances, as having one factor in common: the discharge of a firearm.
Article
To describe the epidemiology of serious non-fatal firearm injury in New Zealand. Cases of nonfatal firearm-related injury were extracted from the hospital inpatient data files of the New Zealand Health Information Service for the period 1979 to 1992 inclusive. There were 1,239 firearm-related injuries, or 2.7 injuries per 100,000 population per year. Males, persons aged 15 to 24 years, certain occupational groups, and persons living in rural environments had higher rates of injury. Unintentional incidents accounted for 64% of the injuries. At least 25% of the incidents involved shotguns, and a further 20% involved rifles. The results presented here serve to support the attention that has been given to prevention of firearm injuries in New Zealand. Priority should be given to establishment of a surveillance system that would provide uniform data on firearm-related mortality and morbidity to aid in risk factor research and development and evaluation of intervention programs.
Article
Out of a total of 624 consecutive gunshot autopsies from Münster and Hamburg, Germany, 32 cases (5.1%) were accidental. The accidents were self-inflicted in 3 cases while another person fired the gun in the remaining 29 cases. More than half of the victims were younger than 25 years and 75% were male. A single gunshot injury was present in all cases and the head was struck in 47% but a detailed analysis of the entrance wound sites did not show any preferential anatomical sites. A surprising finding was the presence of five contact or near contact gunshots (16%). The reasons for these and most other accidents were extreme carelessness when handling a firearm, the involvement of children or adolescents or a foolish behaviour with a gun intended to impress others. Gun-cleaning accidents occurred rarely and there were no major technical defects of the weapons. Preventive measures should concentrate on strict inaccessibility of guns to children and on increased educational efforts to subgroups at risk such as hunters and members of the armed forces. A single non-contact gunshot injury from a long-barrelled firearm can be considered typical for an accident but the great variety and the possible presence of "disguised" suicides and homicides requires a careful forensic investigation including inspection of the scene and reconstruction of the events. It is recommended that a case should always be considered to be non-accidental in the beginning of an investigation.
Article
Gunshot injuries to the hand and upper extremity have been studied during military conflicts and in urban settings. Treatment concepts include identification of injured structures, aggressive surgical wound care, and reconstruction of important functional structures. There are various types of missile injuries. For simplicity, low-energy injuries imply limited damage, and require only conservative approaches. High-energy injuries are complicated by significant tissue destruction, rehabilitation dilemmas, and uncertain outcomes. The surgeon must recognize the anatomic complexity of the hand and proceed with caution. Most gunshot injuries to the hand involve a combination of tissue types. Bone injury is dramatic and is seen radiographically. However, injury to the soft tissue including skin, tendon, blood vessel, and nerve also must be appreciated. Individually, the tissues have varied function and properties of healing. Therefore, the challenge is to prioritize the injury, select an aggressive surgical approach, and integrate a suitable rehabilitation plan.
Article
To provide national estimates of fatal and nonfatal firearm-related (FA) injuries among children < or =14 years old and to examine the circumstances under which these injuries occurred. For nonfatal FA injuries among children, we analyzed data on emergency department (ED) visits from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System for 1993 through 2000. National estimates of injured children who were treated in hospital EDs were examined by selected characteristics, such as age, gender, race/ethnicity of the patient, primary body part affected, intent of the injury, the relationship of the shooter to the patient, where the injury occurred, and activity at the time of injury. For fatal FA injuries among children, we analyzed mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System for 1993 through 2000. Data from both sources were used to calculate case-fatality rates. From 1993 through 2000, an estimated 22,661 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16,668-28,654) or 4.9 per 100,000 (95% CI: 3.6-6.2) children < or = 14 years old with nonfatal FA injuries were treated in US hospital EDs. Assaults accounted for 41.5% of nonfatal FA injuries, and unintentional injuries accounted for 43.1%. Approximately 4 of 5 children who sustained a nonfatal, unintentional FA injury were reportedly shot by themselves or by a friend, a relative, or another person known to them. During this period, 5542, or 1.20 per 100,000 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.23), children < or =14 years old died from FA injuries; 1 of every 5 children who were wounded by a firearm gunshot died from that injury. Most FA deaths were violence related, with homicides and suicides constituting 54.7% and 21.9% of these deaths, respectively. For individuals < or =14 years old, the burden of morbidity and mortality associated with FA injuries falls disproportionately on boys, blacks, and children 10 to 14 years old. Both fatal and nonfatal injury rates declined >50% during the study period. Although rates of nonfatal and fatal FA injuries declined during the period of study, FA injuries remain an important public health concern for children. Well-designed evaluation studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of potential interventions aimed at reducing FA injuries among children.