Article

Working memory and affective decision-making in addiction: A neurocognitive comparison between heroin addicts, pathological gamblers and healthy controls

Department of Psychology, School of Medical Humanitarians, Guiyang Medical University, Guiyang, China
Drug and alcohol dependence (Impact Factor: 3.42). 10/2013; 134(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.09.027
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Cognitive deficits are observed both in heroin dependence and in pathological gambling (PG) on various tasks. PG, as a non-substance addiction, is free of toxic consequences of drug use. Therefore a direct neurocognitive comparison of heroin addicts and pathological gamblers helps dissociate the consequences of chronic heroin use on cognitive function from the cognitive vulnerabilities that predispose addiction.
A case-control design was used, comparing 58 abstinent heroin addicts, 58 pathological gamblers, and 60 healthy controls on working memory and affective decision-making functions. Working memory was assessed using the Self-ordered Pointing Test (SOPT). Affective decision-making was measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).
Heroin addicts performed significantly worse both on the IGT and on the SOPT, compared to healthy controls. Pathological gamblers performed worse on the IGT than healthy controls, but did not differ from controls on the SOPT. Years of heroin use were negatively correlated with working memory and affective decision-making performance in heroin addicts, while severity of gambling was not significantly correlated with any task performance in pathological gamblers.
Our findings indicate that deficits in affective decision-making shared by heroin dependence and PG putatively represent vulnerabilities to addiction and that working memory deficits detected only in heroin addicts may be identified as heroin-specific harmful effects.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nan Sui, Apr 25, 2014
    • "Neurocognitive measures allow for evaluation of possible dysfunction in a variety of cognitive facets and offer insight in to potential underlying neural regions of importance in behavioral addictions (Potenza, 2014). The evaluation of patterns of dysfunction allows for comparisons to healthy comparison subjects, across substance-use disorders, and various other populations of interest which allow for a more in-depth understanding of similarities and differences between these groups (Choi et al., 2014; Leeman and Potenza, 2012; Noël et al., 2013; Yan et al., 2014). Importantly, evaluation of neurocognitive function in PG through neurocognitive tasks has provided insight into the maintenance of this disorder (for review, see Brevers et al., 2013; van Holst et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent progress has been made in our understanding of nonsubstance or "behavioral" addictions, although these conditions and their most appropriate classification remain debated and the knowledge basis for understanding the pathophysiology of and treatments for these conditions includes important gaps. Recent developments include the classification of gambling disorder as a "Substance-Related and Addictive Disorder" in the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet Gaming Disorder in Section 3 of DSM-5. This chapter reviews current neuroscientific understandings of behavioral addictions and the potential of neurobiological data to assist in the development of improved policy, prevention, and treatment efforts.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2015 · Progress in brain research
    • "Neuropsychological testing in subjects with either alcohol dependence or disordered gambling have shown that both disorders are associated with less advantageous decision making abilities and higher impulsive choice behaviour than people without addictive disorders (Goudriaan et al., 2006). However, dissimilar from subjects with substance use disorders, subjects with disordered gambling do not always have working memory problems (Yan et al., 2014), although response inhibition and cognitive flexibility problems seem to be present in more severe forms of pathological gambling (Goudriaan et al., 2006;Odlaug et al., 2011). Neuroimaging studies have provided a subtler message, suggesting the existence of compensatory mechanisms in subjects with disordered gambling that can help them overcome sub-optimal cognitive functioning. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The term 'addiction' was traditionally used in relation to centrally active substances, such as cocaine, alcohol, or nicotine. Addiction is not a unitary construct but rather incorporates a number of features, such as repetitive engagement in behaviours that are rewarding (at least initially), loss of control (spiralling engagement over time), persistence despite untoward functional consequences, and physical dependence (evidenced by withdrawal symptoms when intake of the substance diminishes). It has been suggested that certain psychiatric disorders characterized by maladaptive, repetitive behaviours share parallels with substance addiction and therefore represent 'behavioural addictions'. This perspective has influenced the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), which now has a category 'Substance Related and Addictive Disorders', including gambling disorder. Could other disorders characterised by repetitive behaviours, besides gambling disorder, also be considered 'addictions'? Potential examples include kleptomania, compulsive sexual behaviour, 'Internet addiction', trichotillomania (hair pulling disorder), and skin-picking disorder. This paper seeks to define what is meant by 'behavioural addiction', and critically considers the evidence for and against this conceptualisation in respect of the above conditions, from perspectives of aetiology, phenomenology, co-morbidity, neurobiology, and treatment. Research in this area has important implications for future diagnostic classification systems, neurobiological models, and novel treatment directions.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2015 · European neuropsychopharmacology: the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Source
    • "From a neuropsychological point of view, dysfunctions within these frontal and prefrontal cortical circuits cause impulsivity and abnormalities in decision-making, risk perception, cognitive evaluation of consequences and errors, and goal identification that are supposed to play a key role in compulsive drug-seeking behavior (Lubman et al., 2004; Fishbein et al., 2005; Garavan and Stout, 2005; Krain et al., 2006). In particular, several studies have shown significant behavioral impairments of risky decision-making tasks, such as the Iowa gambling task (IGT) and the balloon analog risk task (BART), in substance-dependent individuals [e.g., Wang et al. (2013); Balconi et al. (2014); Canavan et al. (2014); Hulka et al. (2014); Yan et al. (2014)]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we used a transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of two samples of subjects (18 dependent cocaine users and 18 control subjects) to investigate the effects of left and right cortical excitability on two risk tasks: the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) and the Game of Dice Task (GDT). All subjects randomly received a left anodal/right cathodal stimulation (LAn+), a right anodal/left cathodal stimulation (RAn+), and a sham (placebo) stimulation each run at least 48 hours apart. Participants were asked to perform the BART and the GDT immediately before and after each stimulation. Our results reveal that the activation of the DLPFC (left and right) results in a reduction of risky behaviors at the BART task both in controls subjects and cocaine dependent users. The effect of dTCS on GDT, instead, is more complex. Cocaine users increased safe behavior after right DLPFC anodal stimulation, while risk-taking behavior increased after left DLPFC anodal stimulation. Control subjects’ performance were only affected by the anodal stimulation of the right DLPFC, resulting in an increase of safe bets. These results support the hypothesis that excessive risk propensity in dependent cocaine users, might be due to a hypoactivation of the right DLPFC, as well as to an unbalance interhemispheres interaction. In conclusion, since risky decision-making seems to be, at least in part, responsible for maintenance and relapse of addiction, we argue that a neuromodulation-based approach could represent a valuable adjunct in the clinical treatment of addiction.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014 · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Show more