ArticlePDF Available

Foreign policy analysis, globalisation and non-state actors: State-centric after all?

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This paper is concerned with Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) and non-state actors. Globalisation has brought non-state actors back on the agenda of International Relations. As a result of globalisation, we witness at least some shift of authority from the state to non-state actors (the extent of which remains debated). Although most of the empirical studies focus on ‘domestic’ issues, there are good reasons to assume that foreign policy is equally affected by this trend. Not only are non-state actors autonomous actors in world politics, they are also increasingly involved in the making of states’ foreign policies. Following a discussion of the role of non-state actors in foreign policy, we ask to what extent FPA, IR’s actor-centric sub-field, has taken into account this growing importance of non-state actors. Given FPA’s criticism of seeing the state as a unitary actor, one would expect FPA scholars to be among the first within IR to analyse decision making involving non-state actors. A closer look however reveals that FPA remains focused mainly on state actors, while ignoring private, transnational and international ones. Thus, FPA remains in some way state-centric. We close with an outline of possible directions for further FPA research. Contents: - Multiple Actors in World Politics: An Attempt at Systematisation - NSAs, ‘Rival Actorness’ and Hybrid Foreign Policymaking - Non-state Actors and the FPA ‘Toolkit’ - The Methods of FPA — Suited for NSAs? - NSAs and FPA Research: Centre Stage or on the Fringes? - FPA 2.0: Studying Complex Foreign Policymaking in a Globalised World
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... In a similar vein, Della Porta and Tarrow (2005) stress effective TNA strategies with regard to other international actors, primarily states. Going a step further, Baumann and Stengel (2014 , 490) concede that "non-state actors have a significant impact on states' foreign policymaking" and call this "hybrid foreign policymaking" ( Baumann and Stengel 2014 ). This means "a process by which decision makers (..) formulate policy goals and translate them into outcomes and that involves state actors as well as non-state actors" ( Baumann and Stengel 2014, 495). ...
Article
The interplay of states and transnational actors has found its way into Foreign Policy Analysis. At the same time, the call for new typologies of foreign policy actors has increased. We therefore develop a typological theory of expanded foreign policy and introduce a model of hybrid actorness that alludes to foreign policy actors with both state and transnational dimensions in their polity, politics, and policy. We assume that the transnational element is constitutive of such foreign policy actors. To theorize on such an expansion of foreign policy, we employ an abductive approach and revisit the polity, politics, and policy dimensions of foreign policy. We establish how these are expanded in five transnational sectors, namely state-religion, state-ideology, state-media, state-business, and state-diaspora. We then devise a typology of hybrid actorness by identifying different subtypes that range from latent to fully manifested hybrids. We argue that this model will help better grasp the evolving foreign policy phenomenon of the transnational in an increasingly globalized world.
... Instead, many actors within these structures are contributing to the eventual outcome of policies. In that sense, FPA is a reaction to the dominance of state-centric approaches in IR such as realism that would not accredit other actors than the state (Baumann and Stengel 2014;Hudson 2005). One of the additions that came with FPA is the increased attention for other intellectual disciplines. ...
... 7 This latter approach is also widespread in foreign policy analysis (FPA), although theoretical models have been developed here to analyse their influence on '"hybrid" foreign policymaking'. 8 Despite these advances, however, further conceptual efforts must be made to capture how states attempt to make strategic use of their domestic non-state actors who, while firmly bonded to a given country, operate internationally. 9 Such actors offer a pool of resources states can avail themselves of to increase their clout: expertise, financial means, intelligence, manpower, technologies and reputation, to name but a few. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article translates Michael Mann’s notion of infrastructural power into the foreign policy realm and develops a conceptual framework that allows for the systematic treatment of states’ strategic efforts at mobilising domestic non-state actors. Despite the common rationales underlying such efforts across regime types, the article argues that states’ systemic features matter greatly. It generates two ideal types of infrastructural power in foreign policy – bureaucratic and authoritarian – to capture the distinct mobilisational modes and trajectories of each. Using a typical case study design, it scrutinises Turkey’s shifting Africa policies under AKP rule. The empirical discussion supports two initial assumptions: first, the concept, partly by dint of its underlying organisational approach, introduces a novel take on power in IR, yet one complementary to the relational understanding prevailing in the discipline; second, it provides an original tool with which to systematically analyse crucial components in the foreign policies of democracies and autocracies.
Article
Background The emergence of a multipolar order and the growing potential of African states have captured the attention of German authorities. Through our examination of the policy frameworks directed towards Africa, we elucidate the fundamental motivations behind strategic considerations, which tackle the nexus of economic and security issues while striving to influence the architecture of global governance. Methods We have embedded our research at the intersection of foreign policy analysis (FPA) and the realistic stream of thought within the international political economy (IPE), focusing on economic statecraft in particular. Our novel approach unlocks the complexity of internal decision-making processes in German foreign policy towards Africa. Furthermore, we underscore the interconnectedness between foreign policy and globalisation through the synergistic transformationalist approach. In terms of the pragmatic implementation of economic statecraft, we have studied how harnessing global economic dynamics and presence in Africa may bolster the likelihood of achieving German strategic interests. Results The German approach highlights the importance of the foreign economic policy toolkit while transforming Africa's perception and image from being seen as 'requiring assistance' to one of 'chances and opportunities'. Consequently, the German government seeks to develop a framework that would enable German businesses to increase their investments in Africa, provide local employment opportunities, enhance indigenous industrial capabilities, and promote fair economic transformation within the region. Conclusions Germany seeks to maintain, safeguard, and strengthen the global order, recognising itself as a primary beneficiary. Therefore, key objectives are supposed to mitigate the impacts of de-globalisation and weaponisation of economic interdependencies. Cultivating and fostering collaboration with Africa, having in mind its untapped potential, determines the anticipated effectiveness of this approach. While peace and stability in Africa constitute essential preconditions, strategic orientation necessities economic initiatives that advance German interests: effective diversification and de-risking.
Chapter
The formation of German policy towards emerging powers was a reaction to changes taking place in the international environment and their consequences for the global order. For this reason, it is necessary to combine two perspectives: (1) the perspective of the actor and (2) the systemic perspective. This chapter deals with theoretical issues and provides an essential foundation and set of tools for conducting and understanding the reasoning in the following parts of the book. By addressing the question of the influence of globalisation and the growing significance of emerging powers in foreign policy research, attention is drawn to the interconnections between globalisation theory (GT) and foreign policy analysis (FPA). The main challenges posed to FPA by globalisation will be defined (for example, de-territorialisation and de-nationalisation of foreign policy, proliferation and diversification of international actors, new understandings of state power), considering the mutual isolation of both disciplines and the possibility of their integration to adapt foreign policy research to new conditions.
Chapter
Nigeria emerged in 1960 as an independent state and the 99th member of the United Nations. Among the major issues, confronting the world at that time was the polarisation of the world as occasioned by the Cold War and decolonisation as well as the struggle against apartheid. Nigeria recognised the peculiar implications of these issues for the continent in general and Nigeria in particular and as such made Africa the centrepiece of her foreign policy.
Article
O campo da análise de políticas públicas (APP) tem, há décadas, destacado o papel de uma diversidade de atores não estatais na produção das políticas. Para os estudiosos da política externa, contudo, está continua sendo uma questão periférica, ainda que, em muitos casos, a política exterior tenha se politizado a ponto de despertar o interesse e o ativismo por parte de variados atores da sociedade civil. Com o objetivo de preencher parte dessa lacuna, este trabalho busca, de maneira exploratória, discutir as razões, lógicas e interesses das redes transnacionais em suas tentativas de pautar o processo de produção da política externa. Para tanto, o artigo está estruturado em três seções principais. Primeiramente, é apresentada uma radiografia dos estudos sobre as policy networks desenvolvidas no campo da APP, que trata brevemente da questão conceitual, discute a diversidade das redes, analisa as suas formas de atuação e tenta entender como se organiza, propriamente, o subcampo analítico. Em seguida, discute-se como as redes transnacionais têm sido compreendidas no campo acadêmico das relações internacionais (RI). Feita uma apreciação mais geral, a seção focaliza as comunidades epistêmicas e as chamadas transnational advocacy networks, ressaltando seus objetivos, estratégias e formas de atuação. Por fim, são selecionadas duas tipologias para que sejam apontadas, de maneira hipotética, as variadas maneiras e os momentos em que as redes transnacionais podem impactar a produção da política externa dos Estados nacionais.
Article
Full-text available
Philippines is confronted with a number of security challenges that pose a threat to the country and its inhabitants. Among these challenges are the threat of terrorism. The objective of this research is to ascertain the manner in which the government responds to the ISIS movement within its territory, specifically through the bai'at relationship with the Abu Sayyaf group in Philippines. The liberal rationale of Immanuel Kant and the methods of counterterrorism and multilateralism inform the counterterrorism effort, which is designed to address and overcome terrorist disruptions from separatist groups and to prevent and respond to further terrorist attacks in order to fulfill the obligation to maintain the security of its people. As a member of the United Nations (UN), Philippines reaffirms its commitment to prevent, suppress, and counter all forms of terrorism under the UN Charter, Declarations, and relevant international laws. The Philippine government's efforts, policies, and programs demonstrate that achieving counterterrorism objectives will be challenging due to the lack of a deterrent effect on perpetrators. This is because the criminalization of terrorism perpetrators is often associated with human rights, which has been a topic of discussion among people and communities who believe that the punishment given to terrorism perpetrators should also be based on the values of human rights.
Book
The 2010 WikiLeaks release of 250,000 U.S. diplomatic cables has made it eminently clear that there is a vast gulf between the public face of diplomacy and the opinions and actions that take place behind embassy doors. This book offers unprecedented access to the inner workings of a foreign ministry, and shows us how diplomacy is conducted on a day-to-day basis. Approaching contemporary diplomacy from an anthropological perspective, the book examines the various aspects of diplomatic work and practice, including immunity, permanent representation, diplomatic sociability, accreditation, and issues of gender equality. It shows that the diplomat working abroad and the diplomat at home are engaged in two different modes of knowledge production. Diplomats in the field focus primarily on gathering and processing information. In contrast, the diplomat based in his or her home capital is caught up in the seemingly endless production of texts: reports, speeches, position papers, and the like. The book leaves the reader with a keen sense of the practices of diplomacy: relations with foreign ministries, mediating between other people's positions while integrating personal and professional into a cohesive whole, adherence to compulsory routines and agendas, and, above all, the generation of knowledge. Yet even as they come to master such quotidian tasks, diplomats are regularly called upon to do exceptional things, such as negotiating peace.
Chapter
This book provides a major review of the state of international theory. It is focused around the issue of whether the positivist phase of international theory is now over, or whether the subject remains mainly positivistic. Leading scholars analyse the traditional theoretical approaches in the discipline, then examine the issues and groups which are marginalised by mainstream theory, before turning to four important new developments in international theory (historical sociology, post-structuralism, feminism, and critical theory). The book concludes with five chapters which look at the future of the subject and the practice of international relations. This survey brings together key figures who have made leading contributions to the development of mainstream and alternative theory, and will be a valuable text for both students and scholars of international relations.
Chapter
Taking a fresh look at the impact of non-state actors on world politics and on the foreign policies of states, this book revives the debate on transnational relations which started in the 1970s. This debate withered away in the face of state-centered approaches, but this book's new approach emphasizes the interaction of states and transnational actors, arguing that domestic structures of the state as well as international institutions mediate the policy influence of transnational actors. Empirical chapters examine the European Economic and Monetary Union, US-Japanese transnational relations, multinational corporations in East Asia, Soviet and Russian security policy, democratization in Eastern Europe, and ivory management in Africa. The book concludes with chapters discussing the theoretical implications of the findings in the empirical studies.
Book
Political Analysis provides an accessible and engaging yet original introduction and distinctive contribution, to the analysis of political structures, institutions, ideas and behaviours, and above all, to the political processes through which they are constantly made and remade. Following an innovative introduction to the main approaches and concepts in political analysis, the text focuses thematically on the key issues which currently concern and divide political analysts, including the boundaries of the political; the question of structure, agency and power; the dynamics of political change; the relative significance of ideas and material factors; and the challenge posed by postmodernism which the author argues the discipline can strengthen itself by addressing without allowing it to become a recipe for paralysis.
Book
Recent years have seen a range of theoretical challenges to traditional notions of state sovereignty and a burgeoning debate about the power of the state in the face of globalization and new forms of governance. In this important new text, Georg Sørensen provides a systematic assessment of the contemporary state, steering a middle course between those who argue the state is in retreat and their critics. In so doing he sheds new light on just what is actually changing in the nature of sovereign statehood, on changes in the relative power of different states and on the changing relationship between the domestic and external aspects of state power.