Article

A Randomized Study on 1-Week Versus 4-Week Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

*Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine-Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy †Oncology Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy ‡General Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy §Unit of Angiology, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy ¶General Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy ‖General Surgery, S. Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy **Unit of Angiology, S. Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy ††Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Section of Surgical Clinic I, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy ‡‡General and Emergency Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Annals of surgery (Impact Factor: 8.33). 11/2013; 259(4). DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000340
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

To compare the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic prophylaxis given for 1 week or 4 weeks in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
Extending antithrombotic prophylaxis beyond 1 week reduces the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after open abdominal surgery for cancer.
In consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, complete compression ultrasonography of the lower limbs was performed after 8 ± 2 days of antithrombotic prophylaxis. Patients with no evidence of VTE were randomized to short (heparin withdrawal) or to extended (heparin continued for 3 additional weeks) prophylaxis. Complete compression ultrasonography was repeated at day 28 ± 2 after surgery by investigators blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome of the study was the composite of symptomatic and ultrasonography-detected VTE at day 28 ± 2 after surgery.
Overall, 301 patients were evaluated for inclusion in the study and 225 were randomized. VTE occurred in 11 of 113 patients randomized to short (9.7%) and in none of the 112 patients randomized to extended heparin prophylaxis (P = 0.001). The incidence of VTE at 3 months was 9.7% and 0.9% in patients randomized to short or to extended heparin prophylaxis, respectively (relative risk reduction: 91%, 95% confidence interval: 30%-99%; P = 0.005). The rate of bleeding was similar in the 2 treatment groups. Two patients died during the study period, 1 in each treatment group.
After laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, extended antithrombotic prophylaxis is safe and reduces the risk for VTE as compared with 1-week prophylaxis (NCT01589146).

4 Followers
 · 
73 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer. VTE is a main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer and has a significant impact on their quality of life. Preventing VTE in cancer patients reduces both morbidity and mortality. The level of evidence for antithrombotic prophylaxis of VTE in patients with cancer varies for hospitalized and ambulatory patients. Hospitalized patients with active cancer (for both medical or surgical indication) and reduced mobility should receive thromboprophylaxis throughout hospital stay. Prophylaxis of VTE is not routinely recommended for outpatients with cancer on chemotherapy. For these patients, current guidelines suggest that clinicians should consider antithrombotic prophylaxis on a case-by-case basis in highly selected outpatients. Different strategies for identification of high-risk outpatients with cancer who could benefit of thromboprophylaxis are under consideration. The new oral anticoagulants could have a role for VTE prevention in ambulatory patients with cancer who are on chemotherapy, as they are administered at a fixed dose without routine laboratory monitoring and may have fewer drug interactions with anticancer agents. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    No preview · Article · May 2014 · Thrombosis Research
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of fondaparinux (FPX) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after colorectal cancer surgery. Records of 953 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent resection between 2006 and 2013 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: the FPX group (n = 362), treated with subcutaneous FPX plus intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and the IPC group (n = 591), treated with IPC alone. The incidence of symptomatic VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and other postoperative complications were compared using propensity score matching. Symptomatic VTE occurred only in one patient (0.2%) in the IPC group. In the FPX group, the incidence of major and minor bleeding was 0.55% (2 of 362) and 9.4% (34 of 362), respectively. After propensity score matching, there were no differences between the two groups in the incidence of symptomatic VTE, major bleeding, and other common postoperative complications. Only the incidence of minor bleeding was significantly higher in the FPX group compared to the IPC group. FPX is potentially an effective form of VTE prophylaxis; it is safe in terms of both postoperative bleeding and other common complications after colorectal cancer surgery. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2015 · Digestive surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is higher among patients with cancer. For those undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer, it is suggested to extend thromboprophylaxis during 4 weeks with low-molecular-weight heparin over limited-duration of 7 days. There is no published local data from our country about compliance with recommended guidelines of extended prophylaxis (EP) in patients with cancer undergoing surgical procedures. Our aim was to evaluate the adherence rate to extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis after abdominal-pelvic surgery for cancer, before and after an educational intervention program (EIP) geared toward surgeons. Prospective cross-sectional study before and after an EIP aimed for surgeons. All consecutive patients older than 65 years who underwent surgery for abdominal-pelvic neoplasm, at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina, between September 2013 and May 2014, were evaluated for inclusion. A total of 120 patients were included, 60 before and 60 after the EIP aimed for surgeons. None of the initial 60 patients received EP, while 13 (21.6%) of 60 patients received prophylaxis for 28 days (all with colon or rectal cancer) after the intervention. There were no bleeding or death during 90 days of follow-up, and there were 7 of 120 VTE events, none in the group receiving extended thromboprophylaxis. The EIP for the surgical team significantly improved their adherence but only in the colon-rectal surgeries. The adherence to the recommended guidelines is still low. Reasons could be the subjective perception of elevated bleeding risk and the variable grade of recommendation in different guidelines. © The Author(s) 2015.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2015 · Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Show more