ArticlePDF Available

Rediscovery of the French endemic Chirocephalus spinicaudatus Simon, 1886 from France (Crustacea: Anostraca)

Authors:
  • Sorbonne Université, UPMC/MNHN
Nicolas Rabet1 & Jean François Cart2
1 Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, Uni-
versité Paris; 7, quai St Bernard, bat. A, 2ème étage
(case 7077) ; 75005 Paris, France
2 15, Avenue du Général de Gaulle; 10400 Nogent sur
Seine, France
In 1886, Simon described Chirocephalus
spinicaudatus from the vicinity of Paris,
France. Very little is known about this species,
except that it was collected from several sea-
sonal pools from Ivry, Paris , filled by infiltrated
water, and also perhaps from rock pools in
Lardy. C. spinicaudatus was first thought to be
widely distributed, with three subspecies
(Daday, 1910; Thiéry & Nourisson, 1988).
However, Belk & Brtek (1995) raised all the
subspecies to species level. During the last re-
vision of the French Branchiopod fauna (De-
faye et al., 1998) this species was considered as
possibly extinct since it had not been reported
since its discovery.
In 1999 we rediscovered this species in a
pool in the Aube department at Droupt Sainte
Marie (Champagne Ardenne region) (Fig. 1),
Newsletter of the Large Branchiopod Working Group
Inland Water Crustacean Specialist Group
Species Survival Commission of IUCN - The World Conservation Union
Sponsored and published by
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C.
Apdo. Postal 128, La Paz, Baja California Sur, 23000, MÉXICO
Phone: (52) (612) 125.36.33, Fax: (52) (612) 125.36.25, e-mail: almaeda@cibnor.mx
Editorial Board: Alejandro Maeda, Brian Timms, Christopher Rogers, Gopal Murugan, Hortencia Obregón, Alberto Abreu & Mary Schug Belk.
Rediscovery of the French endemic Chirocephalus
spinicaudatus Simon, 1886 from France (Crustacea:
Anostraca)
Anostracan News
December 2002 Volume 10 Issue 1
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of Chirocephalus spinicaudatus Simon, 1886 Black squares correspond to first known locations (Simon, 1886),
which no longer exist. 1: Paris; 2: Ivry; 3: doubtful locale in Lardy. Black circles correspond to new locations. 4: small pool near the village of Saron
sur Aube; 5: large pool in Saron sur Aube; 6: Droupt Sainte Marie station. Grey area corresponds to important urban areas. Rivers are indicated in
italics.
co-occurring with Lepidurus apus (Linnaeus,
1756) and Lynceus brachyurus Müller, 1776.
This is the first record of L. brachyurus from
France (Rabet & Cart in preparation).
During a systematic sampling review of
temporary pools in 2000, we discovered a more
important population of C. spinicaudatus asso-
ciated with L. apus in a neighbouring pool in
the Marne department at Saron sur Aube
(Champagne Ardenne region). In 2001, we dis-
covered yet another pool near the village where
the second population was found.
Unfortunately, these rediscovered popula-
tions are endangered: the first pool has a re-
duced and variable population likely due to a
shadow cast by growing poplar trees planted in
the pool. The second pool is being progres-
sively filled by several types of material (soil,
farm waste and rubble). The last pool is treated
with Abate (temephos) by local public health
authorities in order to control mosquito popu-
lations. This treatment also killed the Anostra-
can population of the preceding year. These
mosquito control treatments threaten all the
temporary pools in this area. We think that a
protection of this endemic species is urgently
needed.
Literature Cited
Belk, D. & J. Brtek, 1995. Checklist of the Anostraca.
Hydrobiologia 298: 315-353.
Daday, E., 1910. Monographie systématique des
Phyllopodes Anostracés. Annls. Sci. Nat. Zool. 9
ser 11: 91-489.
Defaye, D., N. Rabet & A. Thiéry, 1998. Atlas et
bibliographie des crustacés branchiopodes (Anos-
traca, Notostraca, Spinicaudata) de France métro-
politaine. Coll. Patrimoines Naturels, Volume 32,
Service du Patrimoine Naturel/IEGB/MNHN,
Paris, 61 p.
Nourisson, M. & A. Thiéry, 1988. Crustacés Bran-
chiopodes (Anostracés, Notostracés, Conchos-
tracés). In: Introduction pratique à la systématique
des organismes des eaux continentales françaises.
Bull. mens. Soc. linn. Lyon 57: 1-53.
Simon, E., 1886. Etude sur les Crustacés du sous-or-
dre des Phyllopodes. Ann. Soc. Entom. France, S.
6, 6: 393-460 + 3 pl. h.t.
Fifth International
Large Branchiopod
Symposium
(ILBS-5) Western
Australia, 2004
Dr. Brenton Knott (Department of Zoology,
The University of Western Australia, Ned-
lands, Australia) and Prof. Brian Timms
(School of Environmental and Life Sciences,
University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW,
Australia) are organizing the ILBS-5. They in-
formed that the meeting will be held during
August (probably between 16 & 20), 2004 in a
small town about 2 hours drive from Perth,
Dowerin, in the wheatbelt and accessible to
some excellent branchiopod sites (acid and
neutral salt lakes, granite outcrops), passing
some temporary ponds en route. Note this in
your calendar and be sure to attend the confer-
ence. We are sure that the ILBS-5 will also be
a fruitful meeting.
Publication of the
Special Volume
Studies on Large
Branchiopod
Biology 4
The book Studies on Large Branchiopod
Biology 4 edited by A.M. Maeda-Martínez,
B.V. Timms, D.C. Rogers, F.A. Abreu-Grobois
& G. Murugan was published on 15 October
2002 by Kluwer Academic Publishers as a Spe-
cial Issue, Volume 486 of Hydrobiologia (ISSN
0018-8158), Editor-in-Chief Prof. Dr. H.J. Du-
mont.
The volume, dedicated to the memory of Dr.
Denton Belk, is a collection of papers concern-
ing the biology of the large branchiopod crus-
taceans (Anostraca, Cichlesterida,
Laevicaudata, Notostraca & Spinicaudata).
Most of the contributions were presented at the
Fourth International Large Branchiopod Sym-
posium held in La Paz, Baja California Sur,
México in January 23-27, 2001. The volume
contains 35 papers presented under five major
themes: I. Morphology and Development, II.
Systematics and Regional Faunas, III. Ecology
and Aquaculture, IV. Reproduction, and V.
Genetics and Physiology.
We Are Seeking
Submissions!!
In order to keep bringing the latest in large
branchiopod research, publications and oppor-
tunities, we need you to tell us what you are
working on and what you have published. Our
goal is to ensure that large branchiopod re-
searchers have the ability to discuss ideas with
others who may have similar interests and ex-
periences. To accomplish this goal we have the
following list of action items that we hope to
achieve:
(1) The Anostracan News available in an elec-
tronic medium (with hard copies sent to librar-
ies and those without internet access), complete
with research update articles from contributors,
publication awareness section, and conserva-
tion updates.
(2) An updateable, electronic directory of large
branchiopod researchers, listing the individual,
their address, phone, fax, and email, and their
areas of interest.
(3) An updateable, electronic bibliography of
large branchiopod publications.
The only way that this can work, is if we
have people willing to contribute news, and
articles to the Anostracan News.
Guidelines for manuscript preparation:
1. Provide title, author(s) name(s), address(es)
and the text.
2. All articles will be reviewed by at least 2
reviewers. Authors can send either unre-
viewed article or the revised article with 2
reviewers comments to the Editorial Board
as an attachment file through electronic mail
(email). Hard copies are also accepted.
3. The text has to be typed double-spaced with
margin space.
4. Use Standard International (SI) units.
5. When a species name is used for the first
time, it should be stated in full, and the name
of its describer should also be given.
6. In the reference list, provide complete name
of journals.
7. For figures, send them through email as
JPEG format and also the originals through
normal post.
Page 2
Bayly, I. A. E. 2001. Invertebrate occurrence and succession after
episodic flooding of a central Australian rock-hole. Journal of the
Royal Society of Western Australia 84: 29-32.
Bohonak, A. J. & G. K. Roderick. 2001. Dispersal of invertebrates
among temporary ponds: Are genetic estimates accurate? Israel Jour-
nal of Zoology 47: 367-386.
Camara, M. R. 2001. Dispersal of Artemia franciscana Kellogg (Crus-
tacea; Anostraca) populations in the coastal saltworks of Rio Grande
do Norte, northeastern Brazil. Hydrobiologia 466: 145-148.
Davis, K. C., B. J. Ripley & M. A. Simovich. 2001. Acute toxicity of
malathion and Round Up to the San Diego fairy shrimp Branchinecta
sandiegonensis. American Zoologist 41: 1423-1424.
Lahr, J., A. Badji, S. Marquenie, E. Schuiling, K. B. Ndour, O. A.
Diallo & J. W. Everts. 2001. Acute toxicity of locust insecticides to
two indigenous invertebrates from Sahelian temporary ponds. Eco-
toxicology and Environmental Safety 48: 66-75.
Moorad, J. A., M. A. Simovich & M. S. Mayer. 2001. Identification
of southern Californian branchinectid cysts (Crustacea, Anostraca)
using RAPD-PCR species-specific markers. Transactions of the
Western Section of the Wildlife Society 37: 16-21.
Mura, G. 2001. Updating Anostraca (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) dis-
tribution in Italy. Journal of Limnology 60: 45-49.
Mura, G. 2001. Life history strategy of Chirocephalus ruffoi (Crus-
tacea, Anostraca) in Mediterranean temporary mountain pools. Hy-
drobiologia 462: 145-156.
Obregón-Barboza, H., A. M. Maeda-Martínez & G. Murugan. 2001.
Reproduction, molting, and growth of two Mexican uniparental forms
of the tadpole shrimp Triops (Branchiopoda: Notostraca) under a
recirculating culture system. Hydrobiologia 462: 173-184.
Pereira, G. & J. V. García. 2001. A review of the clam shrimp family
Limnadiidae (Branchiopoda, Conchostraca) from Venezuela, with the
description of a new species. Journal of Crustacean Biology 21:
640-652.
Philippi, T., M. A. Simovich, T. E. Bauder & J. A. Moorad. 2001.
Habitat ephemerality and hatching fractions of a diapausing anostra-
can (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Israel Journal of Zoology 47: 387-
395.
Rogers, D.C. 2001. Revision of the nearctic Lepidurus (Notostraca).
Journal of Crustacean Biology 21: 991-1006.
Shepard, W. D. & R. E. Hill. 2001. Anostracan cysts found in
California salt lakes. Hydrobiologia 466: 149-158.
Timms, B. V. 2001. Two new species of fairy shrimp (Crustacea:
Anostraca: Thamnocephalidae: Branchinella) from the Paroo, Inland
Australia. Records of the Australian Museum 53: 247-254.
Wurtsbaugh, W. A. & Z. M. Gliwicz. 2001. Limnological control of
brine shrimp population dynamics and cyst production in the Great
Salt Lake, Utah. Hydrobiologia 466: 119-132.
Abatzopoulos, T. J., I. Kappas, P. Bossier Peter, P. Sorgeloos & J. A.
Beardmore. 2002. Genetic characterization of Artemia tibetiana
(Crustacea: Anostraca). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75:
333-344.
Ali, A. J. & H. J. Dumont. 2002. Rice bran as a diet for culturing
Streptocephalus proboscideus (Crustacea: Anostraca). Hydrobiolo-
gia 486: 249-254.
Beladjal, L., T. T. M. Vandekerckhove, B. Muyssen, J. Heyrman, J.
de Caesemaeker & J. Mertens. 2002. B-chromosomes and male-bi-
ased sex ratio with paternal inheritance in the fairy shrimp Branchipus
schaefferi (Crustacea, Anostraca). Heredity 88: 356-360.
Belk, D. & D. C. Rogers. 2002. A confusing trio of Branchinecta
(Crustacea: Anostraca) from the western North America with a de-
scription of a new species. Hydrobiologia 486: 49-55.
Belk, D., M. S. Belk & K. A. L. Reading. 2002. Survey of large
branchiopods on Aruba and observations on taxonomic characters in
Leptestheria (Spinicaudata). Hydrobiologia 486: 115-118.
Boix, D., J. Sala, & R. Moreno-Amich. 2002. Population dynamics
of Triops cancriformis (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Notostraca) of the
Espolla temporary pond in the northeastern Iberian peninsula. Hydro-
biologia 486: 175-183.
Boudrias, M. A. & J. Pires. 2002. Unusual sensory setae of the
raptorial Branchinecta gigas (Branchiopoda : Anostraca ). Hydrobi-
ologia 486: 19-27.
Braband, A., S. Richter, R. Hiesel & G. Scholtz. 2002. Phylogenetic
relationships within the Phyllopoda (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) based
on mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 25: 229-244.
Brendonck, L., E. Michels, L. De Meester & B. Riddoch. 2002.
Temporary pools are not ‘enemy-free’. Hydrobiologia 486: 147-159.
Camargo, W. N., P. Bossier, P. Sorgeloos & Y. Sun. 2002. Preliminary
genetic data on some Caribbean Artemia franciscana strains based on
RAPD’s. Hydrobiologia 468: 245-249.
Cohen, R. G. 2002. Description of a new subgenus and a new species
of Thamnocephalus (Crustacea : Branchiopoda, Anostraca ) from the
Salinas Grandes Basin, Cordoba Province, Argentina. Hydrobiologia
486: 91-100.
Dumont, H. J., S. Nandini & S. S. S. Sarma. 2002. Cyst ornamentation
in aquatic invertebrates: a defence against egg-predation. Hydrobiolo-
gia 486: 161-167.
Eder, E. 2002. SEM investigations of the larval development of
Imnadia yeyetta and Leptestheria dahalacensis (Crustacea: Bran-
chiopoda: Spinicaudata). Hydrobiologia 486: 39-47.
Graham, T. B. 2002. Survey of aquatic macroinvertebrates and
amphibians at Wupatki National Monument, Arizona, USA: An
evaluation of selected factors affecting species richness in ephemeral
pools. Hydrobiologia 486: 215-224.
Grygier, M. J., Y. Kusuoka, Y., M. Ida & Lake Biwa Museum Field
Reporters . 2002. Distributional survey of large branchiopods of rice
paddies in Shiga Prefecture, Japan: a Lake Biwa Museum project
based on lay amateur participation. Hydrobiologia 486: 133-146.
Hancock, M. A. & B. V. Timms. 2002. Ecology of four turbid clay
pans during a filling-drying cycle in the Paroo, semi-arid Australia.
Hydrobiologia 479: 95-107.
Harzsch, S. & J. Gloetzner. 2002. An immunohistochemical study of
structure and development of the nervous system in the brine shrimp
Artemia salina Linnaeus, 1758 (Branchiopoda, Anostraca ) with
remarks on the evolution of the arthropod brain. Arthropod Structure
& Development 30: 251-270.
Hebert, P. D. N., E. A. Remigio, J. K. Colbourne, D. J. Taylor & C.
C. Wilson. 2002. Accelerated molecular evolution in halophilic crus-
taceans. Evolution 56: 909-926.
Maffei, C., G. Mura & P. Zarattini. 2002. Assessing anostracan
(Crustacea: Branchiopoda) cyst bank size: An attempt at a stand-
ardized method. Hydrobiologia 486: 255-261.
Martínez-Pantoja, M. A., J. Alcocer, A. M. Maeda-Martínez. 2002.
On the Spinicaudata (Branchiopoda) from Lake Cuitzeo, Michoacán,
México: First report of a clam shrimp fishery. Hydrobiologia 486:
207-213.
Mayer, R. J. 2002. Morphology and biometry of three populations of
Artemia (Branchiopoda: Anostraca ) from the Dominican Republic
and Puerto Rico. Hydrobiologia 486: 29-38.
Moscatello, S., G. Belmonte & G. Mura. 2002. The co-occurrence of
Artemia parthenogenetica and Branchinella spinosa (Branchiopoda:
Anostraca) in a saline pond of south eastern Italy. Hydrobiologia 486:
201-206.
Mura, G., P. Zarattini & S. Petkowski. 2002. Morphological variation
among Chirocephalus diaphanus carinatus populations ( Anostraca )
from the Balkan area. Journal of Crustacean Biology 22: 162-172.
Publication Awareness
Page 3
Editorial Board
Alejandro M. Maeda-Martínez: Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C., Apdo. Postal 128, La Paz, Baja California Sur, 23000, México;
almaeda@cibnor.mx
Brian Timms: School of Geosciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia; ggbvt@cc.newcastle.edu.au
D. Christopher Rogers: EcoAnalysts, Inc., 166 Buckeye St. Woodland, California 95695, U.S.A.; crogers@ecoanalysts.com
Gopal Murugan: Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C., Apdo. Postal 128, La Paz, Baja California Sur, 23000, México; murugan@cibnor.mx
Hortencia Obregón-Barboza: Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C., Apdo. Postal 128, La Paz, Baja California Sur, 23000, México; hobregon@cib-
nor.mx
F. Alberto Abreu-Grobois: Laboratorio de Genética, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 811, Mazatlán, Sinaloa 82000, México;
abreu@ola.icmyl.unam.mx
Mary Schug Belk: 222 King William Apt. 1, San Antonio, Texas 78204, U.S.A.; dbelk@texas.net
Murugan, G., A. M. Maeda-Martínez, H. Obregón-Barboza & N. Y.
Hernández-Saavedra. 2002. Molecular characterization of the tadpole
shrimp Triops (Branchiopoda : Notostraca) from the Baja California
Peninsula, Mexico: New insights on species diversity and phylogeny
of the genus. Hydrobiologia 486: 101-113.
Naegel, L. C. A. & S. Rodriguez. 2002. Ecological observations and
biomass proximate composition of the brine shrimp Artemia (Crus-
tacea : Anostraca ) from Pichilingue, Baja California Sur, Mexico.
Hydrobiologia 486: 185-190.
Nithya, M. & N. Munuswamy. 2002. Immunocytochemical identifi-
cation of crustacean hyperglycemic hormone-producing cells in the
brain of a freshwater fairy shrimp, Streptocephalus dichotomus Baird
(Crustacea : Anostraca ). Hydrobiologia 486: 325-333.
Obregón-Barboza, H. A.M. Maeda-Martínez, H. García-Velazco &
H. J. Dumont. 2002. Branchinecta oterosanvicentei n. sp. (Bran-
chiopoda: Anostraca ), a new fairy shrimp from the Chihuahuan
desert, with a proposal for the conservation of the Branchinectidae of
Mexico. Hydrobiologia 467: 45-56.
Pastorino, X. I., E. Marschoff & R. G. Cohen. 2002. Reproductive
and brood cycles of Artemia persimilis Piccinelli & Prosdocimi from
Colorada Chica Lake (Province of La Pampa, Republica Argentina),
under laboratory conditions. Hydrobiologia 486: 279-288.
Rogers, D. C. 2002. The amplexial morphology of selected Anostraca.
Hydrobiologia 486: 1-18.
Rogers, D. C. 2002. A morphological re-evaluation of the anostracan
families Linderiellidae and Polyartemiidae, with a redescription of the
linderiellid Dexteria floridana (Dexter 1956) (Crustacea: Bran-
chiopoda). Hydrobiologia 486: 57-61.
Rogers, D. C. 2002. Female-based characters for anostracan (Crus-
tacea: Branchiopoda) identification: A key for species of California
and Oregon, USA. Hydrobiologia 486: 125-132.
Samraoui, B. & H. J. Dumont. 2002. The large branchiopods (Anos-
traca , Notostraca and Spinicaudata) of Numidia (Algeria). Hydrobi-
ologia 486: 119-123.
Sarma, S. S. S. & S. Nandini. 2002. Studies on functional response
and prey selection using zooplankton in the anostracan Chirocephalus
diaphanus Prevost, 1803. Hydrobiologia 486: 169-174.
Sanoamuang, L., N. Saengphan & G. Murugan. 2002. First record of
the family Thamnocephalidae (Crustacea : Anostraca ) from South-
east Asia and description of a new species of Branchinella. Hydrobi-
ologia 486: 63-69.
Scanabissi, F., & C. Mondini. 2002. A survey of the reproductive
biology in Italian branchiopods. Hydrobiologia 486: 263-272.
Scanabissi, F., & C. Mondini. 2002. A survey of the reproductive
biology in Italian branchiopods. Hydrobiologia 486: 273-278.
Thiéry, A. & L. Puente. 2002. Crustacean assemblage and environ-
mental characteristics of a man-made solar saltwork in southern
France, with emphasis on anostracan (Branchiopoda) population dy-
namics. Hydrobiologia 486: 191-200.
Timms, B. V. 2002. The fairy shrimp genus Branchinella Sayce
(Crustacea : Anostraca: Thamnocephalidae) in Western Australia,
including a description of four new species. Hydrobiologia 486:
71-89.
Timms, B. V. & S. Richter. 2002. A preliminary analysis of the
conchostracans (Crustacea: Spinicaudata and Laevicaudata) of the
middle Paroo catchment of the Australian arid-zone. Hydrobiologia
486: 239-247.
Timms, B. V. & P. R. Sanders. 2002. Biogeography and ecology of
Anostraca (Crustacea) in middle Paroo catchment of the Australian
arid-zone. Hydrobiologia 486: 225-238.
Torrentera, L. & F. A. Abreu-Grobois. 2002. Cytogenetic variability
and differentiation in Artemia (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) popula-
tions from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Hydrobiologia 486: 303-
314.
Torrentera, L. & D. Belk. 2002. New penis characters to distinguish
between two American Artemia species. Hydrobiologia 470: 149-
156.
Weeks, S. C. & R. J. Duff. 2002. A genetic comparison of two species
of clam shrimp in the genus Eulimnadia: An electrophoretic approach.
Hydrobiologia 486: 295-302.
Weeks, S. C., V. Marcus, R. L. Salisbury & D. W. Ott. 2002. Cyst
development in the conchostracan shrimp, Eulimnadia texana (Crus-
tacea: Spinicaudata). Hydrobiologia 486: 289-294.
Weekers, P. H. H., G. Murugan, J. R. Vanfleteren, D. Belk & H. J.
Dumont. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of anostracans (Branchiopoda
: Anostraca) inferred from nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA)
sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 535-544.
Wildt, M. & S. Harzsch. 2002. A new look at an old visual system:
Structure and development of the compound eyes and optic ganglia
of the brine shrimp Artemia salina Linnaeus, 1758 (Branchiopoda,
Anostraca). Journal of Neurobiology 52: 117-132.
Zarattini, P., V. Rossi, B. Mantovani & G. Mura. 2002. A preliminary
study in the use of RAPD markers in detecting genetic differences in
hatching patterns of Chirocephalus diaphanus Prevost, 1803 (Crus-
tacea: Anostraca). Hydrobiologia 486: 315-323.
Publication Awareness
Page 4
... Chirocephalus spinicaudatus a cependant été retrouvé dans un réseau de mares en région Champagne-Ardennes en 1999 (RABET & CART, 2002 Les mâles deviennent gris-vert avec souvent une partie du corps orange ; ils apparaissent en premier dans le milieu, mais sont ensuite moins nombreux que les femelles. ...
... D'après nos connaissances, il semblerait que ces observations d'anostracés (et de crustacés grands branchiopodes en général) soient les premières réalisées dans le Haut Doubs. Cependant, les "régions" limitrophes (BERCHTOLD & al., 1995 ;DEFAYE & al., 1998 ;FROCHOT & al., 2006 ;RABET & CART, 2002) abritent plusieurs espèces de ces crustacés : Eubranchipus grubii (une station connue dans le département du Jura), Branchipus schaefferi, Chirocephalus diaphanus, Triops cancriformis, Lepidurus apus, Limnadia lenticularis et Lynceus brachyurus. ...
Article
Full-text available
Cet article relate la découverte de 2 espèces d’anostracés dans une mare temporaire d’un village de la vallée du Drugeon, dans le Haut Doubs. Il s’agit de la première citation de ces rares espèces dans la région. Après quelques généralités sur les crustacés grands branchiopodes, ces deux espèces, ainsi que le milieu dans lequel elles ont été observées, seront présentées.
Article
Full-text available
Fourteen species of Branchinella and one each of Parartemia, Streptocephalus (Parastreptocephalus) and an undescribed branchipodid genus occur in a limited area (2000 km2) of the Paroo in northwestern New South Wales and southwestern Queensland. Syntopic coexistence was common (55% of collections) but to a large degree species interactions are minimized by habitat factors of turbidity, salinity and length of the wet phase in decreasing order of importance, and by a species factor of relative size. Discrete habitats such as claypans had a similar species composition each time they filled, but creek pools and other connected sites had variable species composition over time. The high biodiversity is explained by the presence of many distinct types of wetlands, each with their own characteristic anostracans.
Article
Full-text available
The fertilized egg (or cyst) of branchiopods is a highly resistant stage in the life cycle of these aquatic crustaceans. Previous examinations of these cysts have determined that early embryonic development arrests at a late blastula stage, resulting in a small, crescent-shaped body within the egg shell of these shrimp. Herein, we examine the early development of these embryos by sectioning eggs in the ovotestis, brood chamber, and several time periods after exit from the brood chamber in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana Packard. The early sections find no evidence of internal fertilization in the ovotestis. Eggs in the ovotestis showed no signs of cell division, whereas eggs sectioned from the brood chamber were found to be undergoing early embryonic development. A number of empty egg shells and the lack of unfertilized eggs in the brood chamber suggested that egg yolks quickly degrade after egg extrusion from the ovotestis. Cysts that were allowed to develop for 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, 1 week and 1.5 years were sectioned, and embryonic development did not change after the 48 h time period. Thus, embryos appear to arrest development somewhere between 24 and 48 h after exiting the brood chamber.
Article
Full-text available
Herein we report the first genetic comparison among species in the genus Eulimnadia. Multilocus genotypic patterns (using six allozyme loci) were compared for a total of 2277 clam shrimp from nine populations from Arizona and New Mexico. Seven of these populations were morphologically typed as Eulimnadia texana Packard and two were typed as Eulimnadia diversa Mattox. All populations were hermaphrodite-biased, and highly inbred (inbreeding coefficients ranging from 0.33 to 0.98). Genetic distances showed the two species to be within the range described for other arthropods. One of the two E. diversa populations appeared to be a hybrid between E. texana and E. diversa, showing electrophoretic patterns similar to both species, although morphologically, they were typed as E. diversa. A phenogram (generated using coancestry distances and a neighbor joining algorithm) placed this hybrid population half-way between these two species, and a breakdown of individuals within this hybrid population (based on allozyme scores) indicated individuals very similar to the second E. diversa population, and two groups of apparent hybrid individuals. Therefore, the distinction between these two species is questionable due to their apparent hybridization in this area of Arizona. Genetic population structuring was noted among the seven E. texana pools. Estimated migration rates were less than one migrant per generation. Even in the geographically close pools in New Mexico, which were separated by only hundreds of meters, significant sub-structuring was noted, and estimates of migration rate were less than two migrants per generation.
Article
Full-text available
Twelve species in the genera Caenestheria, Caenestheriella, Eocyzicus, Eulimnadia, Limnadia, Limnadopsis, and Lynceushave been collected from intermittent wetlands in the Paroo of northwestern New South Wales and southwestern Queensland. This is the first record of Eocyzicus from Australia. Identifications are partly tentative as the Australian fauna is poorly documented; some species seem to be new. There are many co-occurrences, especially in wetlands connected to others, but generally species are adapted for different ranges of turbidity, salinity and length of the wet phase. The high biodiversity is explained by the presence of many distinct types of wetland, each with its own characteristic species.
Article
Full-text available
Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was used to detect intra-clutch genetic differences of the anostracan Chirocephalus diaphanus Prvost, 1803. Thirty primers were tested on 130 nauplii from three different clutches. Two primers produced five repeatable and well-defined amplification products, that were used as genotype markers. Nauplii hatched after three successive dehydration and rehydration cycles. Consistent genetic differentiation was observed among nauplii from the same clutch. Significant association between presence or absence of three polymorphic amplification products and hatching after different stimuli was observed. These results suggest that RAPD markers might be related to the difference in nauplii hatching and provide reasonable support to the hypothesis that the source of the observed variation in hatching phenology are genetic as well as epigenetic.
Article
The genus Branchinella is diverse in Western Australia, with 18 species, including four new species described here. B. complexidigitata n. sp. is characterized by an intricate frontal appendage, unlike any within the genus. The other three are less remarkable; B. halsei n. sp. is like B. lyrifera, B. kadjikadji n. sp. belongs to the B. affinis group and B. nana n. sp. is similar to B. simplex; similarities are based on frontal appendage and to a lesser extent on the second antennae and penis. Only two species, B. affinis and B. longirostris, are common and widespread; many of the remainder being localized endemics. The high diversity in Western Australia is explained by broad latitudinal range, habitat diversity, and great age and isolation of the landscape.
Article
We studied characteristics of distal retractile penis structures for two recognized species from the New World: A. franciscana, and A. persimilis. Artemia franciscana was characterized by the absence of spine-like outgrowths, while A. persimilis had several spine-like outgrowths at the base of the eversible penis. The distal part of everted penis of A. franciscana is a simple tube armed near its base with only an occasional wart-like protuberance tipped with a single thin spine and ending in a finger-like tip. The retractile penis in A. persimilis was armed with two different groups of conical spine-like outgrowths. The first row of three to four spine-like outgrowths was localized at the junction of the basal and the distal part in a lateral–dorsal position. The second row contained three or more irregularly positioned conical spines localized on the base of the distal part in a lateral–dorsal position. We observed no finger-like tip on the distal penis of A. persimilis. There were also wart-like protuberances tipped with a single thin spine on the base of the distal penis. Some individuals of A. persimilis showed a single hook-shaped spine located in a lateral–ventral position. Our present study confirms that, for species in which the antennal characters are not informative enough, as in the case of Artemia, male genital characters are useful to distinguish not only between genera but also between species when the distal part of the penis is considered. Characters of the distal eversible penis add new valuable information for phylogenetic research.
Article
Main reproductive features of Limnadia lenticularis (Linnaeus, 1761) (Spinicaudata) and Lepidurus apus lubbocki Brauer, 1873 (Notostraca) are given and compared to those of other Italian species. Gametogenesis, germ cell distribution, gonadal architecture, eggshell origin and development, and somatic tract of the gonad structure are studied by means of TEM and SEM. At variance of previous reports suggesting a parthenogenetic reproduction of Limandia lenticularis, we show an hermaphroditic condition for this taxon and that fertilization occurs. On the other hand, the female apparatus of the Notostracan Lepidurus apus lubbocki appears perfectly functional in all analyzed aspects of the gametogenesis. A comparison with Triops cancriformis (Bosc, 1801) – the other Italian Notostracan – indicates a high degree of morphological affinity, also for the absence of male germinal areas.
Article
Physical and chemical variables, anostracan populations (Artemia parthenogenetica and Branchinella spinosa) and other biota were studied during 1996–1997 in a Camargue saltern (max. depth 1 m). The taxonomic composition and density of macroinvertebrates were investigated twice monthly, based on benthic substrate and water column samples. Fauna was composed of three groups in terms of numerical importance. The benthic macroinvertebrates were represented only by nematodes (< 50="" ind.="">–2 to > 500 ind. m–2 in November–December and May respectively). The zooplankton was dominated by crustaceans, one cladoceran, Moina salina (ranging from 670 to 2350 ind. m–2 in spring), two anostracans, Artemia parthenogenetica (< 50="" ind.="">–2 in autumn), and Branchinella spinosa (max. 190 ind. m–2 in December to absent in April), and two copepods, Cletocamptus retrogressus (max. density 2000 ind. m–2 in November), and Eurytemora velox (max. density 650 ind. m–2 in February–March). Insects (Chironomidae, Culicidae) were rare, with mean densities < 1="" ind.="">–2. The phenology of each crustacean population is discussed in relation to physical and chemical water variables. Salinity appeared to be of greatest importance regulating the population abundance.
Article
Compared to research carried out on decapod crustaceans, the development of the visual system in representatives of the entomostracan crustaceans is poorly understood. However, the structural evolution of the arthropod visual system is an important topic in the new debate on arthropod relationships, and entomostracan crustaceans play a key role in this discussion. Hence, data on structure and ontogeny of the entomostracan visual system are likely to contribute new aspects to our understanding of arthropod phylogeny. Therefore, we explored the proliferation of neuronal stem cells (in vivo incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine) and the developmental expression of synaptic proteins (immunohistochemistry against synapsins) in the developing optic neuropils of the brine shrimp Artemia salina Linnaeus, 1758 (Crustacea, Entomostraca, Branchiopoda, Anostraca) from hatching to adulthood. The morphology of the adult visual system was examined in serial sections of plastic embedded specimens. Our results indicate that the cellular material that gives rise to the visual system (compound eyes and two optic ganglia) is contributed by the mitotic activity of neuronal stem cells that are arranged in three band-shaped proliferation zones. Synapsin-like immunoreactivity in the lamina ganglionaris and the medulla externa initiated only after the anlagen of the compound eyes had already formed, suggesting that the emergence of the two optic neuropils lags behind the proliferative action of these stem cells. Neurogenesis in A. salina is compared to similar processes in malacostracan crustaceans and possible phylogenetic implications are discussed.