ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Today's schools face major problems around student motivation and engagement. Gamification, or the incorporation of game elements into non-game settings, provides an opportunity to help schools solve these difficult problems. However, if gamification is to be of use to schools, we must better understand what gamification is, how it functions, and why it might be useful. This article addresses all three questions, exploring both the potential benefits and pitfalls of gamification.
Lee, J. J. & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).
1
Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother?
Joey J. Lee, Teachers College Columbia University, NY
Jessica Hammer, Teachers College Columbia University, NY
Lee, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Technology and Education. Hammer is a Mellon Interdisciplinary
Graduate Research Fellow at the Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy.
Abstract
Today's schools face major problems around student motivation and engagement. Gamification, or the
incorporation of game elements into non-game settings, provides an opportunity to help schools solve these
difficult problems. However, if gamification is to be of use to schools, we must better understand what
gamification is, how it functions, and why it might be useful. This article addresses all three questions – what,
how, and why bother? – while exploring both the potential benefits and pitfalls of gamification.
Introduction
Games and game-like elements have begun to invade the real world. Gamification, defined as the use of game
mechanics, dynamics, and frameworks to promote desired behaviors, has found its way into domains like
marketing, politics, health and fitness, with analysts predicting that it will become a multi-billion dollar industry
by 2015 (MacMillan, 2011). Some visionaries, like game designer Jesse Schell, envision a kind of
gamepocalypse, a hypothetical future in which everything in daily life becomes gamified, from brushing one's
teeth to exercise (Schell, 2010).
Thus far, gamification has most frequently been used as a clever way to promote a business or product. For
instance, players can earn badges, discounts, and other rewards for visiting real-world shops and “checking-in”
to the mobile phone application FourSquare. Games that are designed to promote positive lifestyle changes are
starting to appear as well. Chore Wars and EpicWin encourage players to complete daily chores, while websites
like Google Powermeter can encourage household reductions in energy consumption through the use of progress
bars and collectible badges.
The potential of gamification, however, goes beyond promoting healthy lifestyles and marketing strategies.
Gamers voluntarily invest countless hours in developing their problem-solving skills within the context of games
(Gee, 2008). They recognize the value of extended practice, and develop personal qualities such as persistence,
creativity, and resilience through extended play (McGonigal, 2011). Gamification attempts to harness the
motivational power of games and apply it to real-world problems – such as, in our case, the motivational
problems of schools. Motivation and engagement are major challenges for the American educational system
(Bridgeland, Dilulio, & Morison, 2006). American schools also face a shockingly high dropout rate:
approximately 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school each year (All4Ed, 2010).
Intuition suggests that gamification may be able to motivate students to learn better and to care more about
school. Making the case for gamification, however, requires more than intuition. We must clearly define what is
meant by gamification, evaluate it for its benefits and drawbacks, explore current implementations and future
possibilities, and better understand the theoretical rationale behind gamification. This will allow us to create
effective interventions rather than guessing in the dark.
In this paper, we target these needs by answering three fundamental questions regarding the gamification of
education: “what?” “how?” and “why bother?” First, we answer the “what” question by providing an overview
of current uses of gamification in education. Second, we address “how” by discussing some potential areas in
Lee, J. J. & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).
2
which gamification techniques can provide meaningful interventions for today’s schools. Finally, we consider
“why bother,” discussing the significance of gamification along with its benefits and risks.
What: Definitions and Uses
What do we mean by the gamification of education? After all, schools already have several game-like elements.
Students get points for completing assignments correctly. These points translate to “badges,” more commonly
known as grades. Students are rewarded for desired behaviors and punished for undesirable behaviors using this
common currency as a reward system. If they perform well, students “level up” at the end of every academic
year.
Given these features, it would seem that school should already be the ultimate gamified experience. However,
something about this environment fails to engage students. In contrast, video games and virtual worlds excel at
engagement (McGonigal, 2011). As evidence of this, 28 million people harvest their crops in Farmville on a
daily basis (Mashable, 2010), and over five million people play World of Warcraft for more than 40 hours per
week (Blizzard, 2010). On the other hand, the default environment of school often results in undesirable
outcomes such as disengagement, cheating, learned helplessness, and dropping out. Most students would not
describe classroom-based activities in school as playful experiences. Clearly, the existence of game-like
elements does not translate directly to engagement.
Understanding the role of gamification in education, therefore, means understanding under what circumstances
game elements can drive learning behavior. Making use of Salen and Zimmerman’s Rules, Play, and Culture
framework (2003), we can better break down the impact of gamification. The rules of school as they stand, for
example, must be understood not only in terms of their formal effects but also in terms of their emotional and
social impact on school’s “players.” Disengagement from school happens at the social and emotional levels,
problems exacerbated by the formal rules of school (Rock, 2004). Gamification can change the rules, but it can
also affect students’ emotional experiences, their sense of identity and their social positioning
Gamification projects offer the opportunity to experiment with rules, emotions, and social roles. Read an
optional library book on the topic being taught in class? Receive “Reading” points. Get perfect attendance and
complete all homework assignments on time for a month? Earn an “On Target“ badge. Get assigned as a “Lead
Detective” role in science class? Work hard to ask the best questions. When playing by these rules, students
develop new frameworks for understanding their school-based activities. As suggested by Leblanc (2006), this
can motivate students to participate more deeply and even to change their self-concept as learners.
Existing gamification projects apply these principles at vastly different scales. At one end is gamification at the
micro-scale -- individual teachers who gamify their own class structures. For example, Lee Sheldon, professor at
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, discarded traditional grading in favor of earning “experience points” and
converted homework assignments into quests (Laster, 2010). At the other end of the scale, Quest to Learn, a new
charter school in New York City, uses game design as its organizing framework for teaching and learning. Game
designers work together with teachers to develop playful curricula and incorporate game elements into the entire
school day (Corbett, 2010).
In practice, few people will ever get the opportunity to design a school from scratch. However, we believe there
is an important role for gamification projects that stretch beyond single classes. We have taken a third path in
defining an appropriate scope for our own work at Teachers College Columbia University, creating a ‘game
layer’ which incorporates many different school-based activities. We conceptualize our work as a free, modular
toolkit for instructors, who can fit their own instructional needs into a playful meta-game run by expert designers
and educators. This meta-game, in turn, attempts to foster concrete goal-setting, clear communication, and the
conscious development of student identity as learners. We are currently developing and pilot-testing our project
as a customizable paper-based and online toolkit, which we hope to demonstrate is effective at supporting these
learning goals.
Lee, J. J. & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).
3
From these examples, we can catch a glimpse of the variety of potential uses of gamification. When skillfully
designed and implemented, we believe gamification can help schools do school better. In fact, this is the standard
that gamification in education must live up to. It is not good enough to gamify school because it is the next fad,
or because we believe students are motivated by points, or because we think badges will cause students to
change their behaviors permanently. We must know what problems we are trying to fix, design systems that fix
those specific problems, develop ways of evaluating whether those fixes work, and sustain those fixes over time.
Gamification can only provide tools, and those tools must produce results that are worth the investment.
How: Goals and Techniques
Educational gamification proposes the use of game-like rule systems, player experiences and cultural roles to
shape learners’ behavior. To understand the potential of gamification, however, we must consider how these
techniques can best be deployed in practice. In this section, we discuss three major areas in which gamification
can serve as an intervention.
Cognitive. Games provide complex systems of rules for players to explore through active experimentation and
discovery. For example, the apparently simple mobile game Angry Birds asks players to knock down towers by
launching birds out of a slingshot. Players must experiment with the game to figure out the physical properties of
different tower materials, the ballistics of the slingshot, and the structural weaknesses of each tower. They launch
birds, observe the results, plan their next moves, and execute those plans. In short, players’ desire to beat each
level makes them small-scale experimental physicists.
More broadly stated, games guide players through the mastery process and keep them engaged with potentially
difficult tasks (Koster, 2004). One critical game design technique is to deliver concrete challenges that are
perfectly tailored to the player's skill level, increasing the difficulty as the player's skill expands. Specific,
moderately difficult, immediate goals are motivating for learners (Locke, 1991; Bandura, 1986), and these are
precisely the sort that games provide (Gee, 2008). Games also provide multiple routes to success, allowing
students to choose their own sub-goals within the larger task. This, too, supports motivation and engagement
(Locke & Latham, 1990).
These techniques, applied to schools, can transform student perspectives on learning. Students in schools are
often told what to do without understanding the larger benefits of the work. Gamification can help students ask,
“If I want to master school, what do I do next?” It gives students clear, actionable tasks and promises them
immediate rewards instead of vague long-term benefits. In the best-designed games, the reward for solving a
problem is a harder problem (Gee, 2008). Gamification hopes to make the same true for schools.
Emotional. Games invoke a range of powerful emotions, from curiosity to frustration to joy (Lazarro, 2004).
They provide many positive emotional experiences, such as optimism and pride (McGonigal, 2011). Crucially,
they also help players persist through negative emotional experiences and even transform them into positive
ones.
The most dramatic example of emotional transformation in a game is around the issue of failure. Because games
involve repeated experimentation, they also involve repeated failure. In fact, for many games, the only way to
learn how to play the game is to fail at it repeatedly, learning something each time (Gee, 2008). Games maintain
this positive relationship with failure by making feedback cycles rapid and keeping the stakes low. The former
means players can keep trying until they succeed; the latter means they risk very little by doing so. In schools, on
the other hand, the stakes of failure are high and the feedback cycles long. Students have few opportunities to try,
and when they do, it is high stakes. Little wonder that students experience anxiety, not anticipation, when offered
the chance to fail (Pope, 2003).
Gamification offers the promise of resilience in the face of failure, by reframing failure as a necessary part of
learning. Gamification can shorten feedback cycles, give learners low-stakes ways to assess their own
Lee, J. J. & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).
4
capabilities, and create an environment in which effort, not mastery, is rewarded. Students, in turn, can learn to
see failure as an opportunity, instead of becoming helpless, fearful or overwhelmed.
Social. Games allow players to try on new identities and roles, asking them to make in-game decisions from their
new vantage points (Squire, 2006; Gee, 2008). In video games, players may take on the roles of gun-toting
mercenaries, speedy blue hedgehogs, elven princesses, and more. Players also adopt roles that are less explicitly
fictional, exploring new sides of themselves in the safe space of play. For example, a shy teenager might become
a guild leader, commanding dozens of other players in epic battles against legions of enemies.
Developing a strong school-based identity helps engage students with learning in the long run (Nasir & Saxe,
2003). However, many students do not feel like they can “do school” (Pope, 2003). For these students, gamified
environments can provide an opportunity to try on the unfamiliar identity of a scholar.
Gamification also allows students to publicly identify themselves as scholars through playing the game. The
game can provide social credibility and recognition for academic achievements, which might otherwise remain
invisible or even be denigrated by other students. Recognition can be provided by the teacher, but gamification
can also allow students to reward each other with in-game currency. Such a design encourages students to
reinforce the development of a school-based identity in other students as well as in themselves.
A well-designed gamification system can help players take on meaningful roles that are fruitful for learning. By
making the development of a new identity playful, and by rewarding it appropriately, we can help students think
differently about their potential in school and what school might mean for them.
Why Bother: Risks and Benefits
The strengths of gamification and schools can be complementary, but they are not necessarily so. There are
significant ways in which gamification and schools could each make the other worse. Bringing education and
game elements together could turn out like peanut butter meeting chocolate: two great tastes working together,
leading to results that are especially important for developing 21st century skills. Gamification can motivate
students to engage in the classroom, give teachers better tools to guide and reward students, and get students to
bring their full selves to the pursuit of learning. It can show them the ways that education can be a joyful
experience, and the blurring of boundaries between informal and formal learning can inspire students to learn in
lifewide, lifelong, and lifedeep ways.
The challenges, however, are also significant and need to be considered. Gamification might absorb teacher
resources, or teach students that they should learn only when provided with external rewards. On the other hand,
playfulness requires freedom - the freedom to experiment, to fail, to explore multiple identities, to control one’s
own investment and experience (Klopfer, Osterweil & Salen, 2009). By making play mandatory, gamification
might create rule-based experiences that feel just like school. Instead of chocolate and peanut butter, such
projects are more like chocolate-covered broccoli.
In short, some gamification projects will succeed, and others will fail. Gamification is not a universal panacea. If
we are to improve the odds of gamification providing value to schools, we must carefully design gamification
projects that address the real challenges of schools, that focus on the areas where gamification can provide the
maximum value, that are grounded in existing research, and that address the potential dangers of gamification for
both games and schools. In tandem with the creation of gamification projects, we must develop meaningful
assessments of whether they are achieving their aims.
As gamification spreads throughout the real world, there is little question it will also impact our schools. By
leading with research-based, theory-driven gamification projects, we can work to ensure that the impact of
gamification is a positive one. Gamification will be a part of students' lives for years to come. If we can harness
the energy, motivation and sheer potential of their game-play and direct it toward learning, we can give students
the tools to become high scorers and winners in real life.
Lee, J. J. & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2).
5
References
Alliance for Excellence in Education (All4Ed). (2009). High school dropouts in America. Retrieved from:
www.all4ed.org/files/GraduationRates_FactSheet.pdf
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social–cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Blizzard. (2010). World of warcraft subscriber base reaches 12 million worldwide. Retrieved from:
http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/press/pressreleases.html?101007
Bridgeland, J., DiIulio, J., & Morison, K. B. (2006). The silent epidemic. Seattle, WA: Gates Foundation.
Corbett, S. (2010, September 19). Learning by playing: Video games in the classroom. Retrieved from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/magazine/19video-t.html
Gee, J. P. (2008). Learning and games. In Katie Salen (Ed.) The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games,
and learning (John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation series on digital media and learning).
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S. & Salen, K. (2009) Moving learning games forward. Retrieved from:
http://education.mit.edu/papers/MovingLearningGamesForward_EdArcade.pdf
Koster (2004). A theory of fun. Paraglyph Press. New York, NY.
Lazzaro, N. (2004). Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. Retrieved from:
http://www.xeodesign.com/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf
Laster, J. (2010). At Indiana U., a class on game design has students playing to win. Retrieved from:
http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/at-indiana-u-a-class-on-game-design-has-students-playing-to-
win/21981
Leblanc, G. (2004). Enhancing intrinsic motivation through the use of a token economy. Essays in Education,
11(1).
Locke, E. A. (1991). Goal theory vs. control theory: Contrasting approaches to understanding work motivation.
Motivation and Emotion, 15, 9 –28.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
MacMillan (2011, January 19). 'Gamification': A growing business to invigorate stale websites. Retrieved from:
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_05/b4213035403146.htm.
Mashable (2010, February 20). Farmville surpasses 80 million users. Retrieved from:
http://mashable.com/2010/02/20/farmville-80-million-users/
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World.
Penguin Press. New York, NY.
Nasir, N. S. & Saxe, G. B. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on emerging
tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32, 14-18.
Pope, D. (2003). Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed-out, materialistic, and
miseducated students. Yale University Press.
Rock, M. (2004). Transfiguring it out: Converting disengaged learners to active participants. Teaching
Exceptional Children, 36(5): 64-72.
Rumberger, R. (2004). Why Students Drop Out of School, in G. Orfield (Ed.) Dropouts in america:
Confronting the graduation rate crisis, p. 131–155 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2004).
Salen, K. & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schell, J. (2010). DICE 2010. Design Outside the Box Presentation. Available at:
http://www.g4tv.com/videos/44277/dice-2010-design-outside-the-box-presentation/
Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher,
35(8): 19-29.
... Gamified applications encourage active participation in the learning environment in addition to increased usage time. By providing various opportunities to improve one's skills, interest and motivation can be maintained (Lee and Hammer 2011;Su and Cheng 2015). The implementation of gamification elements may encourage learners to set meaningful goals, redefine failure, and provide direct, fair and incremental feedback . ...
... In addition to a beneficial effect on learner engagement, it can also be assumed that the integration of gamification elements into the learning environment can motivate learners to learn better and invest more time in academic success (Lee and Hammer 2011;Sousa Borges et al. 2014). In particular, meaningful gamified learning environments increase intrinsic motivation because users perceive their actions as significant (Mekler et al. 2013;Sailer et al. 2017;Sakamoto et al. 2012). ...
... If the user is aware of the material rewards and expects to receive more, the learner's intrinsic motivation might decline (Deci et al. 2016). Learners may also feel that learning is always linked to external rewards and is, therefore, reduced to contexts with rewards (Hakulinen et al. 2013;Lee and Hammer 2011). Furthermore, if gamification is firmly integrated into the curriculum, the associated commitment can eliminate the positive effects, because learners might perceive the gamification elements as an obligation rather than an enrichment (Lee and Hammer 2011). ...
Article
Full-text available
Learning is a central component of human life and essential for personal development. Therefore, utilizing new technologies in the learning context and exploring their combined potential are considered essential to support self-directed learning in a digital age. A learning environment can be expanded by various technical and content-related aspects. Gamification in the form of elements from video games offers a potential concept to support the learning process. This can be supplemented by technology-supported learning. While the use of tablets is already widespread in the learning context, the integration of a social robot can provide new perspectives on the learning process. However, simply adding new technologies such as social robots or gamification to existing systems may not automatically result in a better learning environment. In the present study, game elements as well as a social robot were integrated separately and conjointly into a learning environment for basic Spanish skills, with a follow-up on retained knowledge. This allowed us to investigate the respective and combined effects of both expansions on motivation, engagement and learning effect. This approach should provide insights into the integration of both additions in an adult learning context. We found that the additions of game elements and the robot did not significantly improve learning, engagement or motivation. Based on these results and a literature review, we outline relevant factors for meaningful integration of gamification and social robots in learning environments in adult learning.
... The answer to this question can be found in Chapman and Rich's studio (2018). The authors claim that 'traditional education is already compatible with many game elements' (Chapman & Rich, 2018:320), such as 'points for tasks, degrees and diplomas that function as badges, rewards and punishments, rising from grade-to-grade level, and status indicators' (Lee & Hammer, 2011;Smith-Robbins, 2011in Chapman &Rich, 2018. ...
... However, the levels of commitment achieved through games are unmatched by those offered by traditional education. Myriads of people use play willingly in ludic activities just for fun (McGonigal, 2011), and meanwhile schools undergo a lack of commitment and dropout (Lee & Hammer, 2011). Some of the reasons that cause school dropout are boredom, absenteeism and distraction (Huang & Soman, 2013). ...
... Consequently, the mentioned elements are made more transparent to students, who engage on social, emotional and cognitive levels. Their goal, Chapman and Reich say, 'is to help students want to participate more deeply in their education and perhaps to change their self-concept as students' (Lee &Hammer, 2011in Chapman & Rich, 2018. Therefore, we can assume that while the traditional teaching elements have a certain impact on motivation, most of them do not cove so deep in the students as the game elements included in the course. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article presents a research work that is aimed at developing a gamified system and a questionnaire to analyse, in a subsequent phase, how the motivation of university students of Spanish as a second language changes in a gamification context. The article is part of the data-collection phase for a doctoral thesis. Here, we discuss the following research question: to what extent does gamification influence students’ motivation when learning Spanish as a foreign language? Firstly, there arises a need for developing the specific gamified system that will be implemented among several groups of university students of Spanish as a second language. Secondly, an instrument must be created so that the data obtained from the system implementation could be collected and sorted, with the final purpose to provide the research question an empirical response within the subsequent phases of the study. The objective of this work involves the gathering of other comparable studies to make them the basis for a new own gamified system design and questionnaire which, in turn, would become a model for further similar works, by admitting the necessary modifications according to each specific context. Therefore, this work enumerates the different phases of the process that has been carried out to develop the questionnaire and the gamified system, whose configuration has been adjusted to the specific environment and needs. These tools will enable us to determine, in the successive phase of the empirical study, to which extent the motivation of those university students of Spanish as a second language chosen for the gamification experiment has increased from the time they were immersed in it.
... approach produced significant knowledge-level increases over the conventional case-based teaching methods.' Some literature has further demonstrated that the use of gamification in education increases motivation towards and participation in a course (Hakulinen, Auvinen & Korhonen, 2015;Lee & Hammer, 2011;Muntean, 2011) It was able to generate a sense of empowerment among the pupils in their way of working to achieve tasks, making them more attractive and promoting cooperative work, effort, and other positive values typical of games. Alsawaier (2018) also suggested that gamification of refers to the use of gaming techniques to engage people, motivate their action, and promote learning and problem solving. ...
... Educational gamification arouses great interest among educators and is a growing trend (Turan, Z et al, 2016) as the new-technology potentials for motivating students to learn is gamification, which can be defined as "the use of game-design elements in non-game contexts" (Deterding et al., 2011: 9). Via gamification, teachers can provide incentives for expected behaviours in education and to ensure that these behaviours help students to reach intended learning outcomes (Lee & Hammer, 2011;Simões, Redondo, & Vilas, 2013). With suitable planning and implementation, gamification can be conducted in the classroom to create a positive fun learning environment that enables learners to participate actively. ...
Research
Full-text available
It gives us great pleasure to present to you the proceedings of the 29th MELTA International Conference, 'Be Future Ready: Shaping New Understandings in the ELT Landscape'. The conference features ELT professionals sharing innovations in exploring and embracing education for the future. The conference brings together education policymakers, practitioners, and scholars to engage and collaborate with colleagues from around the world to evolve solutions in English language education focused on developing sustainable literacies that are future-proof and relevant focusing on the following sub-themes: • Teacher Professional Development • Pedagogy • Assessment and Evaluation • Literature • Technology • Creative Teacher Showcase, Creative Student-Teacher Showcase and Higher Education Teaching Innovation • Project-Based Learning in STREAM
... Gamification, used in the correct setting, context, and purpose promotes engagement, motivation, and competition (de Byle & Hooper, 2013). As Lee and Hammer (2011) said, skillfully designed and implemented gamified lessons can help schools engage and motivate students. In addition, gamification also provides teachers with better tools to guide and reward students, encouraging students to bring out their full potential. ...
... It is also known to teach resilience by reframing failure as a necessary part of learning, shorten feedback cycles, give learners low-stakes and various ways to assess their capabilities, and reward effort more than mastery among users. These, in turn, make students learn to see failure as an opportunity for them instead of a hindrance to success (Lee & Hammer, 2011). ...
Article
Full-text available
Among the innovative pedagogical strategies that are becoming more popular these days is gamification, transforming tasks and behavior into a more dynamic and engaging experience by borrowing the mechanics and ideas from games. With the belief that humans are naturally playful and curious, this research is grounded on the idea that motivation and engagement improve learning. This study adopts a participatory action research approach in developing a gamified classroom for a laboratory high school chemistry class in the northern part of the Philippines. It involved a two-step cycle, including the curation of game resources, developing game mechanics, award systems, and game economies. Methods of triangulation were done to establish the validity of the following resulting insights about the use of the gameful design on student interest, motivation, and engagement: (1) inclusion of more trade store items in the game economy help broaden student engagement and promote investment in the course (2) personalized achievement card allows flexibility and autonomy (3) game stations extend student learning beyond class time and increase student motivation, (4) game mechanics that allow students to interact with peers are most enjoyed and favored because of increased engagement among participants, which also promote collaborative learning, and (5) addition of creative outputs as extra tasks encourages creativity and allow for inclusive education. Findings also indicate that the implemented practice of action research enriches the teacher’s pedagogical repertoire for creating student-directed chemistry lessons useful, appropriate, and relevant in this new normal in the education system.
... An active learning process through direct experience and problem-solving may be most effective. 25 Gamification's goals are to increase people's interest in the content presented [26][27][28] and to improve learning levels. 29 The concept of gamification implies that the user has fun. ...
Article
Researchers, corporate decision-makers, government agencies, and international bodies want to know how to improve safety and limit the serious social and economic consequences of occupational injuries. Understanding how to deliver effective training is important to achieving this aim. Gamification is considered a new frontier in effective safety training. This study tested the use of gamification in safety training, considering two Italian companies that used a live-action role-play methodology called “PratiCARE la Sicurezza.” Workers who were required by Italian law to receive safety training or retraining participated in a pre–post study. Collection of measures relating to knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and perception of the health and safety climate took place at baseline and immediately after the intervention. Participants’ average safety knowledge at the end of the training was significantly better than the initial level, indicating that the training improved workers’ knowledge level.
... This, it is said, will encourage subjects to differentiate and address the issues they face in society; where individuals live, and the components of fun, scores, level-ups, and ranking rivalries are viewed as contributing to voluntary support by stimulating the subjects' internal and external motivations. Earlier research (Lee & Hammer, 2011;Hwang et al., 2013) suggested that video games aid in cognitive, social, motivational, and emotional development. ...
Article
Full-text available
The present study investigates the role of synchronous and asynchronous education techniques in the context of digital and game-based learning materials through a collaborative study, conducted during the Covid-19 pandemic (October 2020 – June 2021), in an online e-learning environment. The study involved 35 last-year elementary school children, in Western Greece, with learning and behavioral issues. The children were given games with both practical and academic modules throughout their online schooling. For example, a math game was played over WebEx using Kahoot; a game for European institutions was created using the learningapps.org software; and online games from the European Union's "Learning Corner" as well as the game "Defeat the Virus" were used for the Social and Political Education topic. The findings are based on data collected through synchronous and asynchronous e-learning frameworks (WebEx, e-Class), and were linked to both cognitive learning aspects and school children active participation in online education using a standardized psychometric scale called "Psychosocial Adaptation of Primary School Children." The findings suggest that gamification might be a beneficial tool for improving children' cognitive performance in elementary school and generating a meaningful learning experience. The educational intervention aided young people in the development of assertiveness/leadership skills; interpersonal communication skills; social competence; and self-perception. The benefits of the online educational process include the enhancement of students' neurocognitive processes, particularly their executive functions, as well as their social competencies and interpersonal relationships.
... Adopting the strategies and aspects of games in language learning and testing can escalate students' motivation and develop their active participation in a variety of activities. Gamification demonstrated that the learners are encouraged and motivated when the strategy is employed properly in the classroom (Muntean, 2011;Lee & Hammer, 2011). It is indispensable to the language teacher to understand every indispensable concepts and doctrine that games employ gamification as a technique in language learning. ...
Chapter
There are more and more previous works and mobile applications related to the cases of gamification deign and augmented reality applied to museum guide system. However, most of these studies only explored whether digital guide systems can improve users’ learning effectiveness and attitudes, and seldom paid attention to the interactive design aspects of guide systems in museum spaces. Therefore, the objective of this study used a practical case of system prototyping, invited 12 users to use this guide system integrating gamification and augmented reality. After a set of behaviour coding analyses, this paper proposed and discussed the interactive behaviour modes of this system, which can be used as references for the development of museum guide systems.
Chapter
E-learning through gamification is the commonly used education system, which is supported by Information Technology. The study emphasised on the factors affecting E-learning through gamification. The study further elaborates the outcomes of the E-learning through gamification. Due to extensive use of Gamification, it becomes imperative to study and understand different aspects of it to bring in innovation into it. Secondary data has been put to use in this study to create a model of Gamification. Also, essential elements and results which are based on effective learning model for gamification is analysed. By using the following elements in E-learning during gamification goal orientation, achievement, competition, reinforcement and fun orientation the following outcomes has been derived as follows: motivation, satisfaction, engagement, effectiveness, efficiency, experience, knowledge acquisition.
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to address the issue of low completion and high dropout rates in online and distance learning through play and gamification. The general aim of this study is to provide a set of gamification design principles for researchers and practitioners on how gamification can be used in online and distance learning programs in higher education. More specifically, the study intended to seek the answers whether student participation in the online and distance learning programs can be increased by the use of gamification, how the gamification influences the students' academic performances in the online and distance learning programs and what learners think about integrating gamification into the open and distance learning programs in higher education. The study was designed as a sequential exploratory research, which is one of the mixed research methods. Findings indicate that integrating gamification into the online and distance learning programs has a significant impact on increasing students' visits to the learning environment. In addition, when the pre-gamification and post-gamification scenarios were compared in terms of students accessing to the content in the online and distance learning environment, it was discovered that there was a statistically significant increase. It can be also said that there is significant difference regarding to academic performances for gamified situations. Lastly, gamification is said to be fun by students and to contribute positively to their motivation. According to this, gamification has a positive effect on learners' e-learning behaviors and should be used more in online and distance learning programs.
Article
Full-text available
Youth from minority groups often manage a tension between ethnic and academic identities as they are positioned and position themselves in relation to cultural practices in school and out. We argue that a framework involving three strands of analysis is necessary to understand these emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority youth. The strands include analyses of shifts in (a) positioning that take form in face-to-face interactions, (b) positioning over developmental time, and (c) the cultural capital associated with practices themselves over the social histories of communities. We point to the importance of multimethod approaches to pursue such analyses.
Article
Full-text available
This work will examine the link between intrinsic motivation and external rewards by describing the experiences of twenty-seven academically under-performing adolescents who were enrolled in an after school program in a New York City public junior high school that implemented a token economy. The goals of the implemented token economy were to establish an objective measure of student competence, to enhance student perceptions of their autonomy, and to establish links between their classroom-based learning and its practical "real world" applications. It is argued that by achieving these goals, the token economy serves as a tool for enhancing levels of self-efficacy and providing opportunities for students to view their behaviors as self-determined. In this way, the token economy can be viewed as a mechanism for enhancing levels of intrinsic motivation through the use of external rewards.
Article
Full-text available
Whether you're a manager, company psychologist, quality control specialist, or involved with motivating people to work harder in any capacity—Locke and Latham's guide will hand you the keen insight and practical advice you need to reach even your toughest cases. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Interactive immersive entertainment, or videogame playing, has emerged as a major entertainment and educational medium. As research and development initiatives proliferate, educational researchers might benefit by developing more grounded theories about them. This article argues for framing game play as a designed experience. Players’ understandings are developed through cycles of performance within the gameworlds, which instantiate particular theories of the world (ideological worlds). Players develop new identities both through game play and through the gaming communities in which these identities are enacted. Thus research that examines game-based learning needs to account for both kinds of interactions within the game-world and in broader social contexts. Examples from curriculum developed for Civilization III and Supercharged! show how games can communicate powerful ideas and open new identity trajectories for learners.