A fundamental, generally implicit, assumption of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change reports and many energy analysts is that each
unit of energy supplied by non-fossil-fuel sources takes the place of a
unit of energy supplied by fossil-fuel sources. However, owing to the
complexity of economic systems and human behaviour, it is often the case
that changes aimed at reducing one type of resource consumption, either
through improvements in efficiency of use or by developing substitutes,
do not lead to the intended outcome when net effects are considered.
Here, I show that the average pattern across most nations of the world
over the past fifty years is one where each unit of total national
energy use from non-fossil-fuel sources displaced less than one-quarter
of a unit of fossil-fuel energy use and, focusing specifically on
electricity, each unit of electricity generated by non-fossil-fuel
sources displaced less than one-tenth of a unit of fossil-fuel-generated
electricity. These results challenge conventional thinking in that they
indicate that suppressing the use of fossil fuel will require changes
other than simply technical ones such as expanding non-fossil-fuel
energy production.