Access to water is often inequitable, and perceived as unjust by stakeholders. Based
on qualitative analysis of 135 ethnographic interviews in Bolivia, Fiji, Arizona, and
New Zealand, we conduct a cross-cultural analysis to test for shared notions of justice
in water institutions (i.e., rules, norms). A key finding is that institutional rules
are a common concern in evaluations of justice, but institutional norms were prominent
in justice evaluations only in the Bolivia site (where water access problems are
most acute). Similarly, while concerns related to distributive and procedural justice
were widely shared across community sites, interactional justice was only a salient
concern in Bolivia. We propose that the study of water and other natural resource
institutions will benefit from an expanded concept of environmental justice that
includes interactional injustices and also a more explicit analytic focus on institutional
norms, particularly for communities that face resource scarcity and
less-developed economic conditions.