Thermodynamic databases are an essential tool to predict complex
equilibrium mineral assemblages and mineral properties like mineral
volumes. They consist of numerous thermodynamic data of various
minerals, extracted from experiments. Each database follows its own
methodology in calculating chemical and physical properties. Therefore a
direct comparision between different database predictions was avoided,
due to the contrasting methodolgies and philosophy. Here, we present a
direct comparison between the databases of Berman [1] and Holland &
Powell [2][3], focusing on mineral volumes [4]. For this propose, a
reevaluation of the equation of states was nesscary. In this context, we
identify an error also implemented in common thermodynamic softwares,
concerning the calculation of excess volume. Even after treating the
excess energy correctly, volumes show significant discrepancies between
the different database predictions. These discrepancies impact
geodynamic interpretations and geothermobarometrical estimations, due to
the fact that the Gibbs free energy and rock density depends on mineral
volumes. The imagination that pressure can vary by 4 kbar, temperature
by 150°C or rock-density up to 30 %, by changing the thermodynamic
database is dramatic. These enormous differences must be considered
keeping in mind that calculations were done for well studied minerals
(e.g. quartz and forsterite). The results play an important role for
studies of geodynamic interpretations extracted from thermobarometric
software packages like Perple_X, Theriak-Domino or Thermocalc. It is
important to estimate the influence of the thermodynamic database on
Gibbs free energy, volume and rock density. Summarizing, more
experimental data will lead to a better comprehension of these
discrepancies. [1] Berman (1988). Journal of Petrology 29, 445-522.
[2] Holland & Powell (1998) Journal of Metamorphic Geology 16,
309-343. [3] Holland & Powell (2011) Journal of Metamorphic Geology
29, 333-383. [4] Duesterhoeft, Zaehle, De Capitani, Oberhänsli
& Bousquet (2012, in prep.) Submitted to Contributions to Mineralogy
and Petrology.