Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Scholarly Research Network
ISRN Polymer Science
Volume 2012, Article ID 965101, 7pages
doi:10.5402/2012/965101
Research Article
Effects of Alkaline Treatment on the Mechanical
and Rheological Properties of Low-Density
Polyethylene/
Spartium junceum
Flour Composites
S. Ikhlef, S. Nekkaa, M. Guessoum, and N. Haddaoui
Laboratoire Physico-Chimie des Hauts Polym`
eres, D´
epartement de G´
enie des Proc´
ed´
es, Facult´
e de Technologie,
Universit´
eFerhatAbbas,S
´
etif 19000, Algeria
Correspondence should be addressed to S. Nekkaa, snekkaa@yahoo.fr
Received 12 September 2012; Accepted 15 October 2012
Academic Editors: Y. Habibi and A. Uygun
Copyright © 2012 S. Ikhlef et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The effects of Spartium junceum (SJ) flour content, treatment time, and temperature on the mechanical and rheological properties
of low density polyethylene/Spartium junceum flour (LDPE/SJ) composites were studied. SJ flour was treated with NaOH (5% wt)
for 24, 48, and 72 h at 25◦Cand40
◦C. FTIR results showed that there is a partial removal of lignin and hemicelluloses after
treatment which improved the interfacial adhesion matrix/SJ flour. Also, the alkaline treatment improved notably the tensile
strength and Young’s modulus and increased slightly the elongation at break of LDPE/SJ composites compared to those with
untreated flour.
1. Introduction
Natural organic fibers from renewable natural resources offer
the potential to act as biodegradable reinforcing materials
as an alternative for the use of glass or carbon fiber and
inorganic fillers [1,2]. These fibers offer several advantages
including high specific strength and modulus, low cost,
low-density, renewable nature, biodegradability, absence of
associated health hazards, easy fiber surface modification,
and wide availability [3]. But, the main drawbacks of such
composites are their water sensitivity, their relatively poor
dimensional stability, the changing of fiber characteristics
with origin, poor adhesion to basically all matrix polymers,
and poor processability at high fiber contents.
Much work has been done on virgin thermoplastic and
natural fiber composites, which have successfully proven
their applicability to various fields of technical applications,
especially for load-bearing application. Indeed, thermoplas-
tics,suchaspolyethylene(PE)[4,5], polypropylene (PP) [6–
9], polyvinyl chloride (PVC) [10], and polystyrene (PS) [11],
have been compounded with natural fibers (such as wood,
kenaf, flax, hemp, cotton, sisal, jute, abaca, etc.) to prepare
composites.
Nekkaa et al. [12] reported that the use of silane Z-6020
for SJ fibers modification improves the dynamic mechanical
properties of PP/SJ fibers composites. Also, the results of
water absorption showed that silane treatment reduced the
water absorption capacity compared to untreated compos-
ites. The absorption of water by PP/SJ fibers composites
approaches the kinetics of a Fickian diffusion case I at
ambient temperature [13]. The alkaline treatment is also
another method to treat vegetable fibers to increase the
contact fiber matrix and thus their adhesion to each other.
So, the aim of this work is to study the effects of untreated
and treated Spartium junceum flourcontentaswellasthe
time and the temperature of flour surface modification on
the mechanical and rheological properties of LDPE/SJ flour
composites materials.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials. The polymer matrix used in this study was
low-density polyethylene (LDPE) “B-21,” having a density
of 920 kg/m3and a melt flow index (MFI) experimentally
determined (1,51 g/10 min at 190◦C).
2ISRN Polymer Science
Spartium junceum flour was prepared in our laboratory
from fibers obtained from local sources. The shurb can be
cultivated manually, and then the fiber was cleaned and
crushed. The dimension average particle size was 100 μm.
2.2. Treatment of Spartium junceum Flour. The flour was
treated with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) aqueous solution
(5% w/v) for 24, 48, and 72 h at two different temperatures:
25◦Cand40
◦C. Then, it was washed with distilled water until
all the sodium hydroxide was eliminated, and the washing
water pH was neutral. Subsequently, flour was dried at 60◦C
until constant weight was found.
2.3. Compounding and Processing. The composite materials
LDPE/SJ were prepared by mixing the polymer matrix
and the flour in a two-roll mixer (Busto Arsizio) at a
temperature of 158◦C and a mixing rate of 32 rpm/min for
10 min. Different composites LDPE/SJ flour were prepared;
the pretreated and treated SJ flour amounts added were 10,
20, and 30 wt%.
2.4. Measurements Characterization Methods
2.4.1. FTIR Spectroscopy. The spectrometer, FTIR-8400S-
Shimadzu, was used in the transmission mode with a
resolution of 2 cm−1in the range of 4500–500 cm−1.The
samples were tested after being pressed with 2.5 wt% of KBr
to form a disc.
2.4.2. Tensile Test. Specimens tensile test was conducted at
23 ±2◦C using a universal testing machine (Zwick Postfash
4350) with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min according to ISO
527-3 standard. Five specimens of each composition were
tested, and the average value reported.
The tensile properties (Young’s modulus E, tensile
strength σr, and elongation at break εr)areevaluatedfrom
the stress-strain curves.
2.4.3. Impact Strength. Izod and Charpy impact measure-
ments were carried out with a Ceast Resil Impact instrument
in accordance with EN ISO 180 standard at 23 ±2◦C. The
capacity of the pendulum is 7.5 Kg. The impact strength
of unnotched specimens (an) and the impact strength of
notched specimens (ak)werecalculated.
2.4.4. Hardness. Shore D hardness of the samples was
evaluated by using a hardness tester. Samples were placed on
a horizontal surface. Tester was kept in vertical position and
pressed on the specimen so that the presser foot was parallel
to specimen. Five readings at different points were noted,
and average value is reported according to NF EN ISO 868
standard.
2.4.5. Differential Scanning Calorimetry Studies. Adifferen-
tial scanning calorimeter (NETZSCH.DSC 200 PC) was used.
Theheatingratewas10
◦C per min, and the temperature
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500
Wavenumbers (cm−1)
Absorbance
(1) Untreated
(2) 24 h
(3) 48 h
(4) 72 h
1
2
3
4
Figure 1: FTIR spectra of Spartium junceum flour untreated and
treated with NaOH at different times at 25◦C.
ranged from 20◦C to 220◦C. A value of ΔH∞equal to 280 J/g
for a pure crystalline LDPE is used [14].
Enthalpies of fusion ΔHmwere evaluated from the peak
area of fusion. The crystallinity Xcis then determined by the
following relationship:
Xc(%)=
ΔHm
ΔH∞
·100, (1)
Xc(%) is degree of crystallinity; ΔHmis experimental
enthalpy of fusion; ΔH∞is Enthalpy of fusion of a 100%
LDPE cristalline sample.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. FTIR Spectroscopy. Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectra of
untreated and alkaline treated Spartium junceum flour for
different times of treatment at 25◦C.
The intensity of 3400 and 1052 cm−1peaks assigned to
the stretching vibrations of hydroxyl groups of cellulose and
C–O groups of hemicelluloses [15], respectively, decreased
with the chemical treatment of the filler. The alkaline
treatment of the SJ flour induces the partial removal of
hemicellulose and lignin, because of the disappearance of
the band characterizing the carbonyl group observed at
1737 cm−1[16]. The peak at 1644 cm−1in the untreated SJ
flour is associated with the adsorbed water. The decrease
in this peak intensity in the chemically treated SJ flour is
due to the partial removal of hemicelluloses. The weak peak
noticed between 1423 and 1412 cm−1is assigned to the in
plane bending deformation of –CH2of lignin. The stretching
vibrations of C=C bonds in aromatic rings of lignin are
observed at approximately 1577 and 1507 cm−1[17]. The
sharp peak observed at 2926 cm−1reflects C–H asymmetric
deformation of lignin. In conclusion, the alkaline treatment
changes the supermolecular structure of flour while the
chemical structure is not significantly affected. Due to the
intra- and interfibrillar swelling, the accessibility of flour
changes drastically.
ISRN Polymer Science 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
10
20
30
40
Weight loss (%)
Time (hour)
Figure 2: Influence of time of treatment at 25◦Conthepercentage
of weight loss flour.
The possible chemical reaction between the alkaline
solution and the hydroxyl groups of the SJ flour is as follows:
Fiber–OH + Na–OH −→ Fiber–O−Na++H
2O.(2)
3.2. Weight Loss. Natural fiber contains mainly cellulose,
hemicellulose, and lignin. Hemicellulose is a compound
containing several molecules of sugar and substances which
are soluble in water or in alkaline solution. Lignin is also
soluble in alkaline solution. It is possible that some of the
hemicellulose and lignin will dissolve during the treatment
which will cause a decrease in the mass of SJ flour [15].
Figure 2 shows the effect of the treatment time on the
percentage of weight loss of SJ flour at 25◦C. We note that
the evolution of the percentage of weight loss is progressively
important over the first 48 hours of treatment then begins to
stabilize after a treatment period of 48 hours.
3.3. Tensile Properties
3.3.1. Effects of Flour’s Content and Treatment. Figures 3,4,
and 5reveal the effects of the flour content and the treatment
time on the tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and the
elongation at break of LDPE/SJ composites. The addition of
unmodified SJ flour to LDPE matrix induces a sharp decrease
in the tensile strength (Figure 3). Also, the tensile strength of
the composites decreased with increasing flour loading, due
to the weak interfacial adhesion and the low compatibility
between the hydrophilic flour and hydrophobic PE [18–20].
Moreover, a significant increase in Young’s modulus with
increasing SJ flour content is noticed (Figure 4). Thus, the
rigidity of SJ flour, which is higher than that of the thermo-
plastic matrix LDPE, contributes significantly to the increase
of the rigidity of the whole material. At the same time,
a noticeable decrease in the elongation at break prevents
the elasticity of the composite material (Figure 5). On the
other hand, the weak interaction matrix/flour facilitates the
separation at the interface and promotes debonding, which
results in a reduced deformability [7].
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Flour’s content (%)
Untreated 48 h
24 h 72 h
Tensile strength σr(MPa)
Figure 3: Effect of flour content and time of treatment at 25◦Con
the tensile strength of LDPE/SJ flour composites.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Young’s modulus E (MPa)
Flour’s content (%)
Untreated 48 h
24 h 72 h
Figure 4: Effect of flour content and time of treatment at 25◦Con
the Young’s modulus of LDPE/SJ flour composites.
However, the superior tensile strength of alkali-treated
fabrics may be attributed to the fact that the alkaline
treatment improves the adhesive characteristics of the flour
surface by removing natural and artificial impurities [21].
In addition, the alkaline treatment leads to fiber fibrillation
which increases the effective surface area available for contact
with matrix polymer [22,23].
3.3.2. Effect of Temperature. The effect of treatment tem-
perature on the tensile properties of LDPE/SJ (70/30) com-
posites with NaOH-treated flour at different temperatures is
shown in Tab l e 1 . In general, the values of tensile strength,
Young’s modulus, and the elongation at break of LDPE/SJ
composites with flour treated at 25◦C are higher than
4ISRN Polymer Science
Tab l e 1: Effect of temperature on the tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break of composites LDPE/SJ (70/30) with flour
treated with NaOH at different times.
Treatment time (h) σr(MPa) E(MPa) εr(%)
T(25◦C) T(40◦C) T(25◦C) T(40◦C) T(25◦C) T(40◦C)
24 6,50 3,75 491,00 455,00 7,02 4,69
48 8,60 4,66 563,00 310,00 10,28 3,58
72 9,43 8,90 194,00 325,00 5,12 4,09
Tab l e 2: Values of impact strength (Izod) of composites LDPE/SJ composite with treated and untreated flour.
Composites an(KJ/m2)ak(KJ/m2)
LDPE/SJ (100/0) No break No break
Untreated flour
LDPE/SJ (90/10) No break 29,72
LDPE/SJ (80/20) 30,67 17,28
LDPE/SJ (70/30) 18,01 9,25
Treated flour (24 h)
LDPE/SJ (90/10)/25◦C No break No break
LDPE/SJ (80/20)/25◦C No break 24,59
LDPE/SJ (70/30)/25◦C 29,37 13,84
LDPE/SJ (70/30)/40◦C 18,86 9,42
Treated flour (48 h)
LDPE/SJ (90/10)/25◦C No break No break
LDPE/SJ (80/20)/25◦C No break 30,46
LDPE/SJ (70/30)/25◦C 27,45 14,38
LDPE/SJ (70/30)/40◦C 13,28 7,58
Treated flour (72 h)
LDPE/SJ (90/10)/25◦C No break No break
LDPE/SJ (80/20)/25◦C No break 21,63
LDPE/SJ (70/30)/25◦C 23,54 12,82
LDPE/SJ (70/30)/40◦C 18,20 7,94
those of composites with the flour treated at 40◦C. This is
undoubtedly due to the decrease in the cellulose fraction in
the vegetable flour with increasing temperature, which causes
depolymerization and thus the weakening of the flour, and
therefore the reduction of the mechanical properties [4].
3.4. Impact Strength
3.4.1. Effects of Flour’s Content and Treatment. The impact
strength of the composites is significantly lower than of the
neat polyethylene matrix (Tabl e 2 ). The stiffer cellulose flour
acts as stress concentrators in the polymer matrix, reducing
therefore the crack initiation energy and consequently the
impact strength of the composites [8]. This occurs because
of the chemical incompatibility between the thermoplastic
polyolefin and the polar flour, resulting in low interfacial
adhesion [24].
Also, it was noticed that notched specimens showed
lower resilience than unnotched ones because the energy
of notched specimens presents only that of the crack
propagation, while that of unnotched specimens includes the
initiation and propagation of the crack.
The treatment of the flour surface shows an improvement
of the impact strength of composites with treated flour
compared to those with unmodified flour. The values
of impact strength of the different tested composites are
listed in Tabl e 2 . The treatment of the flour improves the
compatibility and promotes the ability to dissipate energy
during fracture.
On the other hand, processing time of 24 and 48 hours
givescompositeswithhighervaluesofimpactstrength
than those of the processing time of 72 hours. This may
be due to the weakening of flour; a long processing time
causes a significant reduction in lignin, which weakens the
flour.
3.4.2. Effect of Temperature. According to the values in
Tab l e 2 , we find that the impact strength of the specimens
with flour treated at 25◦C is higher than that with the flour
treated at 40◦C. This confirms the results found by the tensile
test where the increase in the processing temperature of
the flour causes a decrease in mechanical properties of the
composite material.
ISRN Polymer Science 5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Flour’s content (%)
Elongation at break εr(%)
Untreated 48 h
24 h 72 h
Figure 5: Effect of flour content and time of treatment at 25◦Con
the elongation at break of LDPE/SJ flour composites.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Hardness (shore D)
Flour’s content (%)
Untreated 48 h
24 h 72 h
Figure 6: Effect of flour content and time of treatment at 25◦Con
the hardness of LDPE/SJ flour composites.
3.5. Hardness Results
3.5.1. Effect of Flour’s Content and Treatment. Figure 6 shows
the variations of the hardness of composites with untreated
flour and NaOH-treated flour for different times at 25◦C
as function of flour content. From the figure, we can
deduce that the treatment does not significantly influence
the composites hardness. This can be explained by the
heterogeneity of the composite due to factors related to the
flour.
3.6. Melt Flow Index
3.6.1. Effect of Flour’s Content and Treatment. Adecrease
in the melt flow index with the increase of flour content
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
Flour’s content (%)
Untreated 48 h
24 h 72 h
Melt flow index MFI (g/10 min)
Figure 7: Effect of flour content and time of treatment at 25◦Con
the melt flow index of LDPE/SJ flour composites.
Tab l e 3: Values of the melt flow index of composites LDPE/SJ
(70/30) with treated flour at different times and at different
temperatures.
Treatment time (h) Melt flow index (g/10 min)
T(25◦C) T(40◦C)
24 1,11 1,23
48 0,98 1,45
72 1,11 1,17
is reported according to Figure 7. This reflects the het-
erogeneity of the materials. The probability of aggregates
formation increases with increasing SJ flour content. Thus
aggregation depends on the composition, while the value
of the maximum is determined by adhesion and the load
carried by the SJ flour particles [25].
3.7. Effect of Temperature. According to Figure 7 and the
values reported in Tabl e 3 , there is a slight improvement of
the composites melt flow index values after treatment, but
the increasing of the process temperature does not affect the
values of the melt flow index. This behavior suggests that
the interfacial adhesion between the matrix and the flour is
higher for modified flour, and that the level of dispersion of
the flour within the polymeric matrix is also improved. The
results confirm that the treatment improves the dispersion
and the interfacial adhesion with the matrix.
3.8. Differential Scanning Calorimetry Studies
3.8.1. Effect of Flour’s Content and Treatment. Figure 8 shows
the thermograms of LDPE/untreated Spartium junceum
flour composites. The incorporation of untreated Spartium
junceum flour to the polymeric matrix has no significant
impact neither on the melting temperature nor on the shape
of the melting peak. These results are in agreement with those
6ISRN Polymer Science
Tab l e 4: Thermal Properties of LDPE/untreated and treated Spartium junceum flour composites.
Samples Tm(◦C) first scan Tf(◦C) second scan ΔHm(J/g) Xc(%)
LDPE 113,00 112,50 91,07 32,52
LDPE/SJ (90/10) 113,00 112,70 104,14 37,19
LDPE/SJ (80/20) 112,50 112,30 112,2 40,07
LDPE/SJ (70/30) 113,50 112,30 132,14 47,19
LDPE/SJ (70/30) treated at 25◦C, 24 h 112,50 113,30 131,80 46,76
LDPE/SJ (70/30) treated at 25◦C, 48 h 112,50 113,30 135,60 48,42
LDPE/SJ (70/30) treated at 25◦C, 72 h 112,50 113,30 132,87 47,45
(1) LDPE
(2) LDPE/SJ flour (90/10)
(3) LDPE/SJ flour (80/20)
(4) LDPE/SJ flour (70/30)
1
2
3
4
Temperature (◦C)
50 100 150 200
1
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
Heat flow (W/g)
Figure 8: DSC thermograms of LDPE and different LDPE samples
filled with untreated Spartium junceum flour.
presented by Bendahou et al. [26], Av´
erous et al. [27], and Le
Digabel et al. [28].
According to Tab l e 4, it is clear that the crystallinity χc
increases with untreated flour loading. Thus, the cellulosic
filler acts as nucleation sites which alter the kinetics of crys-
tallization of the semicrystalline polymer. These results agree
with those found by Joseph et al. [29] who noticed a slight
increase of the crystallinity of PP/sisal fibers composites with
increasing the fiber content. Also Nekkaa et al. [30] showed
that the incorporation of SJ fiber in PP caused an apparent
increase in the crystallinity.
Figure 9 shows the comparison of DSC thermograms of
70/30 LDPE/SJ composites based on the flour treated with
NaOH at 25◦Catdifferent times. According to the last figure
and the values reported in the Tabl e 4 , we notice that the
processing time has no effect on the composites-melting
temperature and crystallinity.
4. Conclusion
The SJ flour surface treated with alkaline treatment improved
notably the tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and the
impact strength but slightly the elongation at break of the
50 100 150 200
1
2
3
1
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
Heat flow (W/g)
Temperature (◦C)
(1) 24 h
(2) 48 h
(3) 72 h
Figure 9: DSC thermograms of composites LDPE/treated Spartium
junceum flour at 25◦C (70/30).
composites LDPE/SJ compared to composites with untreated
flour. Also, the values of these parameters for the composites
with the SJ flour treated at the temperature of 25◦Carehigher
than those of the composites with the SJ flour treated at 40◦C.
A decrease in the melt flow index with the increase of
the flour content is noticed. But, a slight improvement of the
values of the composites MFT is observed with the treatment.
The incorporation of SJ flour to LDPE has no significant
impact on the melting temperature but increases the crys-
tallinity.
References
[1] Y.Lei,Q.Wu,andF.YaoetY.Xu,“Pr´
eparation et propri´
et´
es de
PEHD recycl´
e/Composites fibres naturelles,” Composites Part
A, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1664–1674, 2007.
[2] A. K. Bledzki and J. Gassan, “Composites reinforced with
cellulose based fibres,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 24, no.
2, pp. 221–274, 1999.
[3] A. C. Milanese, M. O. H. Cioffi, and H. J. C. Voorwald,
“Mechanical behavior of natural fiber composites,” Procedia
Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 2022–2027, 2011.
ISRN Polymer Science 7
[4] D. Pasquini, E. D. M. Teixeira, A. A. D. S. Curvelo, M.
N. Belgacem, and A. Dufresne, “Surface esterification of
cellulose fibres: processing and characterisation of low-density
polyethylene/cellulose fibres composites,” Composites Science
and Technology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 193–201, 2008.
[5] F. G. Torres and M. L. Cubillas, “Study of the interfacial
properties of natural fibre reinforced polyethylene,” Polymer
Testing, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 694–698, 2005.
[6] M. Zampaloni, F. Pourboghrat, S. A. Yankovich et al., “Kenaf
natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: adiscus-
sion on manufacturing problems and solutions,” Composites
Part A, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1569–1580, 2007.
[7] Z. Dominkovics, L. D´
any´
adi, and B. Puk´
anszky, “Surface
modification of wood flour and its effect on the properties of
PP/wood composites,” Composites Part A,vol.38,no.8,pp.
1893–1901, 2007.
[8] M. Bengtsson, M. L. Baillif, and K. Oksman, “Extrusion
and mechanical properties of highly filled cellulose fibre-
polypropylene composites,” Composites Part A, vol. 38, no. 8,
pp. 1922–1931, 2007.
[9] G. Gong, B. H. Xie, M. B. Yang, W. Yang, W. Q. Zhang, and
M. Zhao, “Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of
injection and compression molded polypropylene/coal gangue
powder composites with and without a polymeric coupling
agent,” Composites Part A, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1683–1693, 2007.
[10] V. O. Guffey and A. B. Sabbagh, “PVC/wood-flour composites
compatibilized with chlorinated polyethylene,” Journal of
Vinyl and Additive Technology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 259–263, 2002.
[11] S. Mishra and J. B. Naik, “Effect of treatment of maleic anhy-
dride on mechanical properties of natural fiber: polystyrene
composites,” Polymer. Plastics Technology and Engineering, vol.
44, no. 4, pp. 663–675, 2005.
[12] S. Nekkaa, N. Haddaoui, A. C. Grillet, and G. Merle,
“Thermal, thermomechanical, and morphological properties
of spartium junceum fiber reinforced polypropylene compos-
ites,” International Journal of Polymeric Materials, vol. 55, no.
11, pp. 837–853, 2006.
[13] S. Nekkaa, M. Guessoum, and N. Haddaoui, “Water absorp-
tion behavior and impact properties of spartium junceum
fiber composites,” International Journal of Polymeric Materials,
vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 468–481, 2009.
[14] K. Sirisinha and D. Meksawat, “Comparison in processability
and mechanical and thermal properties of ethylene-octene
copolymer crosslinked by different techniques,” Journal of
Applied Polymer Science, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 1179–1185, 2004.
[15] A. C. H. Barreto, D. S. Rosa, P. B. A. Fechine, and S. E.
Mazzetto, “Properties of sisal fibers treated by alkali solution
and their application into cardanol-based biocomposites,”
Composites Part A, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 492–500, 2011.
[16] S.K.Madhuban,S.K.Bhaduri,S.K.Banerjee,andK.P.Sao,
“Acetylation of jute and infrared spectra of acetylated jute,”
Indian Journal of Textile Research, vol. 10, no. 68, pp. 68–70,
1985.
[17] F. Corrales, F. Vilaseca, M. Llop, J. Giron`
es,J.A.M
´
endez,
and P. Mutj`
e, “Chemical modification of jute fibers for
the production of green-composites,” Journal of Hazardous
Materials, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 730–735, 2007.
[18]X.Colom,F.Carrasco,P.Pag
`
es, and J. Canavate, “Effects of
different treatments on the interface of HDPE/lignocellulosic
fiber composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 63,
no. 2, pp. 161–169, 2003.
[19] P. W. Balasuriya, L. Ye, and Y. W. Mai, “Mechanical properties
of wood flake-polyethylene composites. Part I: Effects of pro-
cessing methods and matrix melt flow behaviour,” Composites
Part A, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 619–629, 2001.
[20] K. Oksman and C. Clemons, “Mechanical properties and
morphology of impact modified polypropylene-wood flour
composites,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 67, no.
9, pp. 1503–1513, 1998.
[21] E. T. N. Bisanda and M. P. Ansell, “The effect of silane
treatment on the mechanical and physical properties of sisal-
epoxy composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 41,
no. 2, pp. 165–178, 1991.
[22] Y. Habibi, W. K. El-Zawawy, M. M. Ibrahim, and A. Dufresne,
“Processing and characterization of reinforced polyethylene
composites made with lignocellulosic fibers from Egyptian
agro-industrial residues,” Composites Science and Technology,
vol. 68, no. 7-8, pp. 1877–1885, 2008.
[23] A. K. Mohanty, M. A. Khan, and G. Hinrichsen, “Surface
modification of jute and its influence on performance of
biodegradable jute-fabric/Biopol composites,” Composites Sci-
ence and Technology, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1115–1124, 2000.
[24]S.M.B.Nachtigall,G.S.Cerveira,andS.M.L.Rosa,
“New polymeric-coupling agent for polypropylene/wood-
flour composites,” Polymer Testing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 619–628,
2007.
[25] L. D´
any´
adi, T. Janecska, Z. Szab´
o, G. Nagy, J. M ´
ocz ´
o, and B.
Puk´
anszky, “Wood flour filled PP composites: compatibiliza-
tion and adhesion,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 67,
no. 13, pp. 2838–2846, 2007.
[26] A. Bendahou, Y. Habibi, H. Kaddami, and A. Dufresne,
“Composite materials based on ligno-cellulosic fibres and
thermoplastic matrices (IPP and LDPE),” RevueRoumainede
Chimie, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 557–563, 2009.
[27] L. Av´
erous, C. Fringant, and L. Moro, “Plasticized starch-
cellulose interactions in polysaccharide composites,” Poly mer,
vol. 42, no. 15, pp. 6565–6572, 2001.
[28] F. Le Digabel, N. Boquillon, P. Dole, B. Monties, and L.
Averous, “Properties of thermoplastic composites based on
wheat-straw lignocellulosic fillers,” Journal of Applied Polymer
Science, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 428–436, 2004.
[29] P. V. Joseph, K. Joseph, S. Thomas et al., “The thermal
and crystallisation studies of short sisal fibre reinforced
polypropylene composites,” Composites Part A,vol.34,no.3,
pp. 253–266, 2003.
[30] S. Nekkaa, M. Guessoum, F. Chebira, and N. Haddaoui,
“Effect of fiber content and chemical treatment on the thermal
properties of spartium junceum fiber-reinforced polypropy-
lene composites,” International Journal of Polymeric Materials,
vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 771–784, 2008.
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
Scientifica
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Corrosion
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Polymer Science
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Ceramics
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Composites
Journal of
Nanoparticles
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
Biomaterials
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Nanoscience
Journal of
Textiles
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Nanotechnology
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Crystallography
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
The Scientic
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Coatings
Journal of
Advances in
Materials Science and Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Smart Materials
Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Metallurgy
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
BioMed
Research International
Materials
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Nanomaterials
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Nanomaterials