A preview of this full-text is provided by World Scientific.
Content available from International Journal of Innovation Management
This content is subject to copyright.
INNOVATION & PRODUCTIVITY: INVESTIGATING
EFFECTS OF OPENNESS IN SERVICES
ANNE-LAURE MENTION
*
and ANNA-LEENA ASIKAINEN
†
Centre de recherche public Henri Tudor
29 Avenue J.F. Kennedy, 1855 Luxembourg
*
anne-laure.mention@tudor.lu
†
anna-leena.asikainen@tudor.lu
This study investigates the effects of openness on the different stages of the innovation
process and further on firm performance. More specifically, it concentrates on inter-firm
cooperation and information sourcing practices, which embody the implementation of an
inbound open innovation strategy. Cooperation and information sourcing from market
actors is contrasted with cooperation and information sourcing from competitors. To
different extents, these actors may shape research and development (R&D) investments,
affect success of the innovation process and contribute directly as well as through the
innovation process to the labour productivity. Effects of these simultaneous practices on
the innovation process are investigated in service sector firms, which have so far been
largely neglected in (open) innovation studies. Results indicate that cooperation with and
information sourcing from competitors positively influence innovation performance while
market cooperation and information sourcing is resource-intensive and deteriorates per-
formance on the short term.
Keywords: Open innovation; performance; measurement; cooperation; information
sourcing; services; productivity.
Introduction
Although the interactive and networked nature of the innovation process is nothing
new, it has gained widespread interest since the term “open innovation”was
popularized by Chesbrough (2003). Usually relying on case studies, extant liter-
ature has described the phenomenon itself (e.g., Chesbrough, 2003 and 2011;
Huston and Sakkab, 2006) and explored its implementation highlighting the
influence of both internal and external contingency factors (e.g., Arora and
⁄
Corresponding author.
International Journal of Innovation Management
Vol. 16, No. 3 (June 2012) 1240004 (27 pages)
© Imperial College Press
DOI: 10.1142/S136391961240004X
1240004-1