ArticlePublisher preview available

INNOVATION & PRODUCTIVITY: INVESTIGATING EFFECTS OF OPENNESS IN SERVICES

World Scientific
International Journal of Innovation Management
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of openness on the different stages of the innovation process and further on firm performance. More specifically, it concentrates on inter-firm cooperation and information sourcing practices, which embody the implementation of an inbound open innovation strategy. Cooperation and information sourcing from market actors is contrasted with cooperation and information sourcing from competitors. To different extents, these actors may shape research and development (R&D) investments, affect success of the innovation process and contribute directly as well as through the innovation process to the labour productivity. Effects of these simultaneous practices on the innovation process are investigated in service sector firms, which have so far been largely neglected in (open) innovation studies. Results indicate that cooperation with and information sourcing from competitors positively influence innovation performance while market cooperation and information sourcing is resource-intensive and deteriorates performance on the short term.
INNOVATION & PRODUCTIVITY: INVESTIGATING
EFFECTS OF OPENNESS IN SERVICES
ANNE-LAURE MENTION
*
and ANNA-LEENA ASIKAINEN
Centre de recherche public Henri Tudor
29 Avenue J.F. Kennedy, 1855 Luxembourg
*
anne-laure.mention@tudor.lu
anna-leena.asikainen@tudor.lu
This study investigates the effects of openness on the different stages of the innovation
process and further on rm performance. More specically, it concentrates on inter-rm
cooperation and information sourcing practices, which embody the implementation of an
inbound open innovation strategy. Cooperation and information sourcing from market
actors is contrasted with cooperation and information sourcing from competitors. To
different extents, these actors may shape research and development (R&D) investments,
affect success of the innovation process and contribute directly as well as through the
innovation process to the labour productivity. Effects of these simultaneous practices on
the innovation process are investigated in service sector rms, which have so far been
largely neglected in (open) innovation studies. Results indicate that cooperation with and
information sourcing from competitors positively inuence innovation performance while
market cooperation and information sourcing is resource-intensive and deteriorates per-
formance on the short term.
Keywords: Open innovation; performance; measurement; cooperation; information
sourcing; services; productivity.
Introduction
Although the interactive and networked nature of the innovation process is nothing
new, it has gained widespread interest since the term open innovationwas
popularized by Chesbrough (2003). Usually relying on case studies, extant liter-
ature has described the phenomenon itself (e.g., Chesbrough, 2003 and 2011;
Huston and Sakkab, 2006) and explored its implementation highlighting the
inuence of both internal and external contingency factors (e.g., Arora and
Corresponding author.
International Journal of Innovation Management
Vol. 16, No. 3 (June 2012) 1240004 (27 pages)
© Imperial College Press
DOI: 10.1142/S136391961240004X
1240004-1
... Intuitively, an increase in innovation performance, ceteris paribus, is also likely to improve productivity. This was also discussed by Fernández Gual and Segarra-Blasco (2013) who found that both product and process innovation induce growth in labour productivity, and by Mention & Asikainen (2012) who found that innovation output positively influences labour productivity. ...
... This research contributes to the OI literature through a CM that shows the direct and indirect effect of OI on productivity, enabling sensemaking on the topic. This is a compelling contribution since previous studies mainly focused on the single impact of specific OI forms on various measures for productivity (e.g., Arvanitis, 2012;Belderbos et al., 2006;de Leeuw et al., 2014;Mention and Asikainen, 2012), whereas the complexity of the OI-related factors impacting on productivity had not been elaborated before. In addition to the direct effect, the CM considers the positive effect of product and process innovation performance on productivity, since both new technologies and new work organisation can be pivotal to enhance productivity (Fernández Gual and SegarraBlasco, 2013;Lööf and Heshmati, 2002;Mention and Asikainen, 2012). ...
... This is a compelling contribution since previous studies mainly focused on the single impact of specific OI forms on various measures for productivity (e.g., Arvanitis, 2012;Belderbos et al., 2006;de Leeuw et al., 2014;Mention and Asikainen, 2012), whereas the complexity of the OI-related factors impacting on productivity had not been elaborated before. In addition to the direct effect, the CM considers the positive effect of product and process innovation performance on productivity, since both new technologies and new work organisation can be pivotal to enhance productivity (Fernández Gual and SegarraBlasco, 2013;Lööf and Heshmati, 2002;Mention and Asikainen, 2012). In turn, innovation performance is a typical outcome stemming from OI activities (e.g., Lopes and de Carvalho, 2018), hence describing a first important indirect link from OI to productivity. ...
Article
The innovation literature on operations-based organisations describes the positive effect of Open Innovation (OI) on productivity. However, a systemic overview of how OI directly and indirectly impacts productivity is missing, particularly for project-based organisations. Hence, the article aims to fill this gap by providing a systemic representation of how OI enhances project-based organisations' productivity. The article focuses on the construction ecosystem since construction is an exemplary project-based industry and is known for its widespread and longstanding poor productivity. In particular, we investigated how OI is adopted and how OI can enhance productivity in the construction ecosystem. We conducted twenty semi-structured interviews with experts involved in OI construction projects in the UK. This paper makes three academic contributions. First, it provides an account of the most relevant causes for poor productivity in construction. Second, it consolidates primary and secondary data in a novel cognitive map providing a systemic representation of how OI enhances productivity in construction. The validity of the map goes beyond the boundaries of the construction ecosystem, being supported by several cross-sectorial references. Third, the paper offers six strategies that leverage OI to address the specific causes of low productivity in construction.
... Furthermore, ICT integration helps firms to better adapt to changing client needs, boosting customer pleasure and loyalty. Numerous studies have repeatedly shown that ICT has a positive impact on both creativity and productivity [41,111,112]. According to Ref. [113], investments in ICT have a considerable influence on organizations' innovation performance. ...
Article
Full-text available
Technological innovation is a critical element of economic and environmental sustainability; thus, the promotion of technological innovation in the economy has gained an apex among policy makers. The study's impetus is to measure the effect of investments in information and communication technology (ICT), education, and political stability on technical innovation in BRI countries for 2004–2020. In the process of documenting the empirical nexus through the implementation of novel panel techniques commonly known as Dynamic Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR), continuously updated fully modified" (Cup-FM) and continuously updated bias-corrected (Cup-BC). The results of the slope of heterogeneity, cross-sectional dependency test, and panel cointegration test have revealed the presence of heterogeneity, all the research variables possessed certain common dynamics, and, most importantly presence of long-run association. The study documented the coefficients of ICT, education and Political stability are positive and statistically significant, indicating a contributory effect in fostering technological innovation in BRI nations. The findings emphasize the importance of upholding political stability, directing resources toward education, and fostering an environment that encourages innovation through the integration of information and communication technology (ICT). The study also highlights how critical it is to bring in FDI and use it to your advantage in order to boost tech development and the economy.
... Some authors claim that open innovation results in increased innovation and financial performance (Enkel, Gassmann, and Chesbrough 2009;Verbano, Crema, and Venturini 2014;Zhao, Sun, and Xu 2016). Cooperation with industry partners and sourcing information from the market positively affects innovation intensity and output (Mention and Asikainen 2012). Open innovation challenges are the independent variables and competitiveness the outcome/criterion variables. ...
Article
Full-text available
Open innovation is a function of managing innovation challenges within an organization to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. To achieve this, organizations have to configure and regulate their strategic resources, harness their core competencies and absorptive capacity, and manage uncertainties inherent in their business activities. This study aimed to examine the impact of open innovation strategy challenges on the competitiveness of automotive component manufacturers (ACMs) in South Africa. It addressed ACM open innovation challenges and their effect on competitiveness and the relationship between open innovation strategy and competitiveness. The study employed a quantitative methodology with a sample survey consisting of 44 respondents comprising the owners, and senior and junior managers responsible for research and development. The results identified that the challenges faced by ACMs are lack of resources, lack of dynamic capabilities and high-risk exposure, with the lack of resources being the most significant. The study's significant implications are that ACMs should design strategic measures that mitigate the adverse spillover effects of resource deficiencies impacting dynamic capability transformation and risk mitigation. The study contributes to existing knowledge by extending the concept of attaining above-average returns through integrating the resource-based view theory, the dynamic capabilities theory, and the portfolio theory.
... Since the stakeholder groups of the host country are different from those of the home country, enterprises can gain an organizational learning effect by in-depth contact with the stakeholder groups of the host: Enterprises can obtain and learn the upstream scientific and technological information of the supply chain of the host country through communication with suppliers, universities and research institutions of the host country, so as to promote the transfer of upstream complementary knowledge and improve the innovation ability of enterprises. Meanwhile, enterprises can cooperate with interest groups such as distributors, retailers and customers in the host country, so as to learn new market knowledge and product knowledge, and transform the knowledge into application-oriented innovative products to meet the expanded market demands [66]. Also, enterprises in their home countries can acquire rich international operation experience through decentralized R&D activities around the world. ...
Article
Full-text available
Although R&D internationalization plays an important role in enterprises’ globalization, few studies explore the mechanism of R&D internationalization and emerging market companies’ innovation, or the relationship between R&D internationalization, domestic technology alliances and absorptive capacity. How does the R&D internationalization of emerging market enterprises affect the innovation of those enterprises? Under fierce market competition, do absorption capacity and domestic technology alliances have a significant impact on enterprise innovation? From the perspective of the knowledge-based view, this paper studies 185 enterprises undergoing R&D internationalization in China from 2012 to 2017, using high-dimensional Poisson fixed effects model, we use instrumental (HDFE IV) estimation to explain the impact of R&D internationalization on the innovation of the parent company and the mechanism behind it. The study finds that R&D internationalization positively promotes the parent company’s innovation, and domestic technology alliances and absorptive capacity play a partial mediator role in R&D internationalization. In the face of fierce market competition, domestic technical alliances play a significant role in promoting enterprise innovation, while absorptive capacity plays a negative role in promoting enterprise innovation with the moderating effect of market competition.
Article
Full-text available
Open innovation is a collaborative paradigm that improves business performance. However, the majority of investigations approach large and multinational companies with developed economies, so this work analyzed the relationship of external collaboration of open innovation with financial performance in small and medium-sized companies in an emerging economy. For this, a questionnaire was applied to owners and managers of 145 companies located in Tamaulipas, Mexico. The results processed through structural equations in SPSS and AMOS indicate the absence of a positive and significant relationship between the vertical collaboration of open innovation (customers, users and suppliers) and financial performance. In contrast, a positive and significant relationship was found between the horizontal collaboration of open innovation (educational institutions, government and competitors) with financial performance, with elements such as co-development of products, inputs of knowledge and ideas, acquisition of machinery, equipment, software and supplies. Keywords: Open innovation; horizontal collaboration; vertical collaboration; financial performance; emerging economy
Article
Full-text available
From an organizational perspective, open innovation (OI) capability assessments are becoming increasingly important. The authors propose that an organization’s attitude toward interactive OI activities among OI stakeholders can reveal its degree of capability. This paper aims to focus on an organization’s OI attitude measurement scales and develop a framework linked to the role perspectives and loci of OI activities occurring at the organizational level. This research will introduce a practical, theory-based indication of OI assessment by combining a deductive process that identifies organizational OI attitude constructs with an inductive framework development process. First, the authors conducted an extensive literature review of attitude measurement on the execution of OI. Then, they performed empirical data analysis using a large-scale structured attitude assessment survey from individuals in domestic and multi-national corporations (n = 134), which led to the development of questionnaire sets on attitude evaluation. This study contributes to developing an organizational OI attitude assessment scale. Furthermore, based on empirical data analysis, the research framework demonstrated the reliability and validity of the organizational OI attitude measurement scale. Specifically, the scale contains proven questionnaires assessing OI attitudes by interrogating individual actors’ impact, behavior, and cognition regarding their organization’s OI activities. The organization’s three role perspectives (transfer, absorption, and brokerage) and two loci of activities in the OI ecosystem provide six distinct dimensions, suggesting areas of focus for a firm’s strategic OI direction.
Article
Full-text available
Technological development of the last several decades has driven open innovation towards organizational, business, social, and economic change. Open innovation has emerged as the main driver of change in a business sector that needs to be flexible and resilient, rapidly adapting to change through innovation. In this context, the present study aimed to explore the limits of open innovation by extracting evidence from user-generated content (UGC) on Twitter using social media mining. To this end, in terms of the methodology, we first applied machine learning Sentiment Analysis algorithm texted using Support Vector Classifier, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest Classifier to divide the sample of n = 586.348 tweets into three groups expressing the following three sentiments: positive, negative, and neutral. Then, we used a mathematical topic modeling algorithm known as Latent Dirichlet allocation to analyze the tweet databases. Finally, Python was used to develop textual analysis techniques under the theoretical framework of Computer-Aided Text Analysis and Natural Language Processing. The results revealed that, in the tweets dataset, there were eight topics. Of these topics, two contained tweets expressing negative sentiments (Culture and Business Models/Management), three topics contained tweets expressing positive sentiments (Communities, Creative projects and Ideas), and three topics contained tweets expressing neutral sentiments (Entrepreneurship, Teams and Technology). These topics are discussed in the context of limitations, risks, and characteristics of open innovation according to the UGC on Twitter. The paper concludes with the formulation of 20 limits of open innovation and 27 research questions for further research on open innovation, as well as a discussion of theoretical and practical implications of the study.
Chapter
This chapter examines how technology transfer has operated in university-company projects in small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) via the UK Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) scheme. A qualitative case study approach is used, focusing on three companies drawn from an initial review of 14 technology transfer projects. This provides the foundation for the development of a model of 12 key factors that underpinned successful outcomes in these projects. The 14 cases are then reviewed overall, in terms of their impact on either process change, service improvement, or product development. The analysis draws upon both the post-project assessments of the funding body and the developed model and concludes that using new technology to innovate in internal processes and services is likely to prove more successful than projects focusing on new product development. The model provides an analytical framework that will be of interest and value to academics and business practitioners looking to develop university-industry partnerships involving technology change and innovation.
Book
Innovation has become a key factor for economic growth, but how does the process take place at the level of individual firms? This book presents the main results of the OECD Innovation Microdata Project - the first large-scale effort to exploit firm-level data from innovation surveys across 20 countries in an internationally harmonised way, with a view to addressing common analytical questions. Through the use of common indicators and econometric modeling, this analytical report presents a broad overview of how firms innovate in different countries, highlights some of the limitations of current innovation surveys, and identifies directions for future research.
Article
Increased international competition, particularly from Japan, along with subtle shifts in the role of interfirm agreements are causing academics, businessmen, and policymakers to rethink fundamental ideas about competition and cooperation. New ways in which firms can cooperate to compete are receiving considerable attention. However, firms wanting to experiment with new ways of organizing business contractually rather than by merger run the risk of getting snagged on out-of-date antitrust ideology. This article examines the need for cooperative agreements in the context of innovation and competitive opportunities and also explores the public policy problems that confront them. The authors discuss the need for a reexamination of our antitrust laws in order to foster a balance between cooperation and competition.
Article
It is well known that theoretical work in academia as well as innovative efforts in firms often follow parallel tracks and that quite similar new ideas, concepts, and products emerge almost simultaneously, without much direct communication taking place among the parallel efforts. This may also occur in the social sciences in periods when certain ideas are "in the air" and certain new phenomena and insights become more obvious to analysts. In this article, I bring out some fundamental similarities and differences between two sets of ideas that overlap in important respects but where we find little cross-referencing. One relates to national business systems (NBS), the other to national innovation systems (NIS). The fact that there are few references between the two, although they deal with related issues, suggests a potential for cross-fertilization. Having contributed extensively to the literature on national systems of innovation (Lundvall, 1988, 1992), I ask: What can the innovation-systems approach learn from the work of Richard Whitley (1994a, 1994b, 1996) and his colleagues? And, vice versa, are there experiences from the field of innovation-systems studies that may be useful for the further development of the business-systems approach? I begin by comparing the two approaches in terms of major differences and similarities. The Whitley approach may be commended for its attempt to be explicit regarding the elements constituting the national system and to specify their structural interconnections. But its neglect of international specialization, central to the innovation-system approach, causes it to underestimate the feedback impact of the business system on the institutional setup. The business-systems approach, while originally rooted in sociology, increasingly has become based on economic theory and especially on a version of the Penrosian theory of the firm. This brings me to the interpretation made by Whitley (1996) of the firm, and I argue that it puts too little emphasis on learning and competence building and too much on risk sharing and on the application of existing competencies.
Article
For generations, Procter & Gamble generate most of its phenomenal growth by innovating from within-building global research facilities and hiring the best talent in the world. Back when companies were smaller and the world was less competitive, that model worked just fine. But in 2000, newly appointed CEO A.G. Lafley saw that P&G couldn't meet its growth objectives by spending greater and greater amounts on R&D for smaller and smaller payoffs. So he dispensed with the company's age-old "invent it ourselves" approach to innovation and instead embraced a "connect and develop" model. By identifying promising ideas throughout the world and applying its own capabilities to them, P&G realized it could create better and cheaper products, faster. Now, the company collaborates with suppliers, competitors, scientists, entrepreneurs, and others (that's the connect part), systematically scouring the world for proven technologies, packages, and products that P&G can improve, scale up, and market (in other words, develop), either on its own or in partnership with other companies. Thanks partly to this connect-and-develop approach, R&D productivity at Procter & Gamble has increased by nearly 60%. In the past two years, P&G launched more than loo new products for which some aspect of development came from outside the company. Among P&G's most successful connect-and-develop products to hit the market are Olay Regenerist, Swiffer Dusters, the Crest SpinBrush, and the Mr. Clean Magic Eraser. Most companies are still clinging to a bricks-and-mortar R&D infrastructure and to the idea that their innovation must principally reside within their own four walls. Until they realize that the innovation landscape has changed and acknowledge that their current model is unsustainable, top-line growth will elude them.
Article
This paper addresses how the Open Innovation concept, as recently coined by Henry Chesbrough, can be analyzed from an industrial dynamics perspective. The main proposition of the paper is that the specific modes in which different companies manage Open Innovation in regard to an emerging technology reflect their differential position within the innovation system in question, the nature and stage of maturity of the technological regime, and the particular value proposition pursued by companies. The proposition is analyzed through an in-depth study of the current transformation of sound amplification from linear solid state technology to switched or digital technology within the consumer electronics system of innovation. The analysis especially addresses the complex interplay between technology entrepreneurs and incumbents, and demonstrates that Open Innovation sometimes has to be conducted under conditions of high transaction costs.