In this article, I explore ways of facilitating discourse about the timbral structures of musical pieces. I address three areas of timbral study: (1) dimensions, (2) auditory streaming and pitch, and (3) change rate and attentional focus. In (1) I draw upon psychoacoustical approaches to timbre, suggesting that dimensions may be divided into “analytical” and “holistic” types. In (2), I draw upon Parncutt'S pitch salience algorithm (1992) and Huron'S perceptual voice-leading Principles (2001) for stream salience estimations; and in (3), I offer notational and analytical preference rules for a theoretical model of timbral change.
In order to illustrate the usefulness of modes of inquiry (2) and (3), the article includes sample analyses, principally of bars 1–11 of Schoenberg'S Opus 16, No. 3 ( Farben). Although listeners generally have difficulty perceiving the canonic structure of Farben, application of Parncutt'S algorithm reveals that if Schoenberg had intended the moving canonic voices to be perceptually salient, his choice of pitches for the five-voice chords was well judged. I suggest that the divergence between listeners' perceptions and the Parncutt results may be attributed to various factors highlighted in Huron'S voice-leading Principles, and to the timbral change rate.
A theory of timbre must draw upon analytical techniques that are adaptable to many different contexts. The eclectic tool-set that I have offered here is based on perception. Application of the proposed perceptual tools provides insight into specific hearings and, perhaps more importantly, may enable listeners to hear in new ways.