ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Contrary to lay beliefs, physiological changes that co-occur with stress are not necessarily bad. Much can be done during stressful experiences to promote adaptive responses. In this article, we review recent research on one method for improving acute stress responses: reappraising arousal. A growing body of research suggests that cognitive appraisals are powerful tools that help shift negative stress states to more positive ones. Arousal reappraisal instructs individuals to think of stress arousal as a tool that helps maximize performance. By reframing the meaning of the physiological signals that accompany stress, arousal reappraisal breaks the link between negative affective experiences and malignant physiological responses. We demonstrate how this approach can benefit physiological reactivity, attention, and performance and explore its potential applications.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Current Directions in Psychological
Science
XX(X) 1 –6
© The Author(s) 2012
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0963721412461500
http://cdps.sagepub.com
Stress is ubiquitous in daily life and typically is a negative
experience. Indeed, people devote considerable time and
resources to reducing stress levels via regulatory behaviors,
such as vacationing, exercising, or having some cocktails at
the local pub. These efforts, however, do not change stressful
experiences but rather provide an escape from day-to-day
stressors. What are the options for coping with acute stress
when escape is not possible? What can people do in the
moment to modify the stressful experience? Research indi-
cates that cognitive processes, particularly reappraisal, can
shift negative stress to positive stress.
Background
Scientists have long believed that the mind and body are
tightly linked, with changes in one directly affecting the other.
Seminal work by Schachter and Singer (1962), for example,
specified that cognitive processes, physiological signals, and
situational cues interact to determine emotions. The idea that
the mind and body operate in concert to produce psychological
states is evident in current models of emotion. For instance,
Conceptual Act Theory argues that appraisal transforms inter-
nal states into emotions by integrating bodily changes with
external sensory information and knowledge of the situation
(Barrett, 2006).
To understand how the body and mind work together, imag-
ine you are a skier staring down a steep, icy slope with no
other way off the mountain than plunging down this trail.
Regardless of your affinity for skiing, this situation would
likely elicit an increase in physiological arousal. Avid skiers
might experience excitement, believing that they could handle
the difficult trail, whereas novices would be more likely to
experience fear if the difficulty of the trail were perceived to
exceed their skill level. Thus, arousal is semantically and psy-
chologically fuzzy (Blascovich, 1992). Our responses depend
in large part on how a situation and our body’s responses are
construed.
The biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat offers
an explanation of how appraisals and situations interact to
shape stress responses (see Blascovich & Mendes, 2010, for a
review). Both challenge and threat states are experienced dur-
ing acute stress but differ in antecedent appraisal processes
and downstream physiological responses. Individuals experi-
ence challenge when appraisals of personal resources exceed
situational demands—like the expert skiers in the example
above. Alternatively, threat manifests when perceived demands
exceed resources. Although both states are accompanied by
sympathetic activation, challenge is characterized by improved
cardiac efficiency and dilation of the peripheral vasculature,
Corresponding Author:
Jeremy P. Jamieson, University of Rochester, 437 Meliora H all, Rochester,
NY 14627
E-mail: jeremy.jamieson@rochester.edu
Improving Acute Stress Responses:
The Power of Reappraisal
Jeremy P. Jamieson1, Wendy Berry Mendes2, and
Matthew K. Nock3
1Department of Psychology, University of Rochester; 2Department of Psychiatr y, University
of California, San Francisco; and 3Department of Psychology, Harvard University
Abstract
Contrary to lay beliefs, physiological changes that co-occur with stress are not necessarily bad. Much can be done during
stressful experiences to promote adaptive responses. In this article, we review recent research on one method for improving
acute stress responses: reappraising arousal. A growing body of research suggests that cognitive appraisals are powerful tools
that help shift negative stress states to more positive ones. Arousal reappraisal instructs individuals to think of stress arousal
as a tool that helps maximize performance. By reframing the meaning of the physiological signals that accompany stress, arousal
reappraisal breaks the link between negative affective experiences and malignant physiological responses. We demonstrate
how this approach can benefit physiological reactivity, attention, and performance and explore its potential applications.
Keywords
stress, reappraisal, emotion regulation, psychophysiology
2 Jamieson et al.
whereas threat decreases cardiac efficiency and constricts the
vasculature in anticipation of damage or defeat. Commonly
held beliefs suggest that arousal experienced during stress is
bad, but sympathetic activation may actually be greater during
approach-motivated challenge states than during threat states.
This notion is consistent with the idea of physiological tough-
ness, which suggests that activation of the sympathetic ner-
vous system (SNS) facilitates effective coping and improves
performance in situations of acute stress (Dienstbier, 1989).
Using the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat
as a framework, recent studies have sought to improve
acute stress responses by altering appraisals of arousal (e.g.,
Jamieson, Mendes, Blackstock, & Schmader, 2010; Jamieson,
Nock, & Mendes, 2012a, 2012b). In this line of research,
research participants are told that the physiological arousal
experienced during stressful situations can be thought of as a
resource that aids performance. Participants who reframe the
meaning of the physiological signals that accompany stress as
beneficial experience more positive outcomes than those who
do not (Fig. 1).
Research on reappraising arousal has extended work on
emotion regulation (Gross, 1998, 2002) and cognitive behav-
ioral therapy (CBT; Hofmann & Smits, 2008). The underlying
theme of these approaches is that changing cognitions pro-
duces downstream benefits. Reappraisal, as specified by emo-
tion-regulation models, typically involves the reinterpretation
of the affective meaning of contextual cues. In other words,
emotionally charged stimuli are presented, and participants are
instructed to reinterpret the stimuli (e.g., “The images are
fake”) or distance themselves from the stimuli (e.g., by adopt-
ing a third-person perspective; Kross & Ayduk, 2011; Ochsner
& Gross, 2008). Clinical researchers developed CBT to help
improve patient outcomes by modifying faulty affective
responses and cognitions (Barlow, 2004). For instance, depres-
sive patients are taught to identify errors in thinking (e.g.,
“Everyone hates me and always will”) and replace them with
more rational thoughts.
In the “classic” emotion-regulation literature, reappraisal
has often (but not always) centered on decreasing sympathetic
activation during passive tasks (e.g., Gross, 2002). Likewise,
reappraisal in clinical research typically either decreases
arousal (e.g., mindfulness meditation; Cincotta, Gehrman,
Gooneratne, & Baime, 2011) or teaches individuals to accept
arousal (e.g., interoceptive exposure; Levitt, Brown, Orsillo,
& Barlow, 2004). Decreased SNS arousal might be adaptive
when no instrumental cognitive or physical responses are
Increased
Physiological
Arousal
Negative
Arousal
Appraisals
Adaptive
Physiological
Responses
Reduced
Negative
Affect
Facilitated
Performance
Reduced Bias
for Threat Cues
Stressful
Situation
Increased
Physiological
Arousal
Negative
Arousal
Appraisals
Maladaptive
Physiological
Responses
Negative
Affect
Performance
Impairments
Vigilance for
Threat Cues
Stressful
Situation
X
Arousal
Reappraisal
b
a
Fig. 1. The impact of stress on downstream outcomes and the effects of arousal reappraisal. As shown in
panel (a), stressful situations are accompanied by increased physiological arousal, which is typically construed
in a negative manner. These negative appraisals of arousal feed forward to produce myriad negative outcomes,
including negative affect, maladaptive pat terns of physiological reactivity, increased vigilance for threat cues,
and impaired performance. As shown in panel (b) , arousal-reappraisal manipulations break the association
between stress-based arousal and negative appraisals. By severing this link, arousal-reappraisal techniques
help shift negative stress states to more positive ones, leading to a reduction in negative affect, more adaptive
patterns of physiological reactivity, reduced attentional bias for threat cues, and improved performance.
Reappraisal and Acute Stress Reponses 3
required, but during active tasks, increased SNS arousal can
facilitate mobilization of oxygenated blood to the brain and
periphery, thereby improving performance. Arousal reap-
praisal narrows in on acutely stressful events that require
active responding and identifies bodily responses, specifically
sympathetic arousal, as a coping tool. That is, arousal reap-
praisal seeks to alter cardiovascular responses so as to promote
adaptive responding during acute stress (cf. Dienstbier, 1989;
Mendes & Jamieson, 2011). It is not aimed at eliminating or
dampening stress arousal but instead focuses on changing the
type of stress response.
Psychophysiological Studies of Arousal
Reappraisal
Initial examinations of arousal reappraisal have suggested that
it can positively affect physiology, attention, and performance.
In one study, we examined how reappraising arousal might
alter cardiovascular functioning and attention during and after
a stressful evaluative task (Jamieson et al., 2012a). After a
resting baseline, participants were instructed that they were
going to complete a public-speaking task (the Trier Social
Stress Test; Kirschbaum, Pirke, & Hellhammer, 1993). Just
prior to the task, we assigned one third of the participants to an
arousal-reappraisal condition that consisted of instructions
educating them on the functionality of stress responses and
encouraged them to interpret arousal as a tool that aids perfor-
mance; another third received a “placebo” intervention that
described the best way to cope with stress was to ignore the
source of that stress; and the remaining third were given no
instructions. During the stressful task, reappraisal participants
exhibited an approach-oriented physiological profile, indexed
by less vasoconstriction and greater cardiac output, compared
with participants assigned to the other conditions. Immedi-
ately after the public-speaking task, we assessed attentional
bias (using an emotional Stroop task; Williams, Mathews, &
MacLeod, 1996). Reappraisal participants exhibited less vigi-
lance for threat cues than did participants in the other two
groups.
Extending this study, we recently examined how arousal
reappraisal facilitates recovery from stress (Jamieson et al.,
2012b). Participants instructed to reappraise arousal not only
exhibited more adaptive physiological responses during stress
but also had their physiological responses return to baseline
more quickly after the stressful situation, compared with no-
instruction controls.
The benefits of arousal reappraisal also extend to high-
stakes testing situations (Jamieson et al., 2010). We recruited
students preparing to take the GRE to come to the laboratory
for a practice GRE study. Half of the prospective test takers
were informed that signs of physiological arousal (e.g.,
increased heart rate) that accompany testing situations predict
better, not worse, performance. Before beginning the practice
test, participants provided a saliva sample that was analyzed
for alpha amylase, a nonspecific measure of sympathetic
activation (Nater & Rohleder, 2009) that tends to covary with
catecholamines (e.g., dopamine, epinephrine [adrenaline], and
norepinephrine; Rohleder, Nater, Wolf, Ehlert, & Kirschbaum,
2004). Participants assigned to reappraise arousal exhibited an
increase in alpha amylase and improvements in their perfor-
mance on the quantitative section of the practice GRE, relative
to no-instruction controls. One to three months after the labo-
ratory session, participants returned to the lab with their score
reports from the actual GRE. Compared with controls, reap-
praisal participants scored higher on the quantitative section of
the actual GRE and reported that arousal on the day of the test
had aided their performance. These findings demonstrate that
a brief laboratory-based reappraisal manipulation may have
sustained effects on stress appraisals and performance.
Taken together, the aforementioned research demonstrates
that reappraising arousal as a coping tool during acutely stress-
ful episodes that require instrumental responses can promote
adaptive physiological responses, reduce attentional bias, and
improve performance. However, the literature has yet to pin
down the exact mechanisms of change. For example, in the
GRE study, reappraisal participants exhibited long-term ben-
efits, but we are uncertain of why the effects persisted. Reap-
praisal participants may have engaged in the same reappraisal
they learned in the lab during the actual test, or their success in
the lab may have reinforced studying and improved perfor-
mance through learning. Future research should attempt to
uncover when and why reappraisal might “stick.”
Mechanisms and Moderators
Emotion regulation research has examined the neurological
underpinnings of reappraisal processes, with the research sug-
gesting a componential view (Ochsner & Gross, 2008). That
is, specific brain regions map onto subprocesses of reappraisal.
For example, areas of the medial prefrontal cortex allow indi-
viduals to consider what reappraisal instructions mean to them
(Mitchell, Banaji, & Macrae, 2005). Additional areas of the
prefrontal cortex then help develop a strategy to modulate
activity (Ochsner, Bunge, Gross, & Gabrieli, 2002), and sub-
sequent changes in the hippocampus and amygdala attenuate
the release of corticotrophin-releasing hormone (which stimu-
lates the synthesis of adrenal hormones such a cortisol;
Dedovic, Duchesne, Andrews, Engert, & Pruessner, 2009).
Further back in the temporal sequence, examining per-
ceived resources and demands provides a look into how
arousal reappraisal shifts perceptions of stress on an experien-
tial level. Participants instructed to reappraise arousal reported
that they possessed more resources to cope with a stressful
public-speaking task than did participants given no instruc-
tion, but reappraisal did not influence appraisals of situational
demands (Jamieson et al., 2012b).
In addition to identifying mechanisms, future research
should consider moderators. For example, individual differ-
ences could determine the effectiveness of arousal reappraisal.
Along these lines, individuals who are better able to reappraise
4 Jamieson et al.
situations so as to decrease their emotional impact exhibit
more adaptive responses to anger provocation compared with
individuals low in reappraisal tendencies (Mauss, Cook,
Cheng, & Gross, 2007; Schmader, Forbes, Zhang, & Mendes,
2009). Thus, some people might simply be better than others
at applying reappraisal instructions.
Another variable to consider is interoceptive accuracy
the ability to perceive one’s bodily changes (Critchley, Wiens,
Rotshtein, Ohman, & Dolan, 2004). It is unclear whether
individuals with high interoceptive accuracy would benefit
more or less from arousal reappraisal. If sympathetic activation
produces the improvements seen in our work (cf. Dienstbier,
1989), then accurate interoceptors may exhibit greater
improvements than poor interoceptors because of their ability
to perceive increases in sympathetic arousal (Werner, Duschek,
Mattern, & Schandry, 2009). Conversely, stress and arousal
tend to be negatively perceived, so good interoceptors may
exhibit more rigid negative-arousal appraisals and be less
inclined to “believe” reappraisal instructions. Alternatively,
interoception may be unrelated to reappraisal, given that
research has yet to show whether good interoceptors can dif-
ferentiate types of stress.
Studying moderators will also help specify the conditions
necessary for reappraisal effects to manifest while highlight-
ing limitations. One likely necessary condition is motivation.
If individuals are disengaged, then altering arousal appraisals
will not influence outcomes. To illustrate this point, in the
GRE study (Jamieson et al., 2010), if we had recruited college
freshmen for whom this particular test was not currently self-
relevant, reappraisal may not have affected performance. In
other words, the stakes must be high. Another limitation evi-
dent in the GRE study is that arousal reappraisal instructions
benefited only quantitative performance; verbal performance
was unaffected. Compared with verbal problems, math prob-
lems generally require more active processing. Thus, reap-
praisal may benefit performance only when active-processing
demands are high.
Applications of Arousal Reappraisal
Reappraisal is a centerpiece of CBT. Some CBT methods even
include giving individuals information about the evolutionary
antecedents and adaptive functions of biological responses, as
is evident in patient workbooks for anxiety and panic (e.g.,
Barlow & Craske, 2000). Arousal reappraisal can add to such
approaches by including components that not only educate
people about the functionality of biological responses to stress
but also encourage the maintenance of adaptive levels of SNS
activation during acute stress. As such, arousal reappraisal is
best applied to psychopathology that is directly tied to stress-
ful experiences for which sympathetic activation is needed for
optimal performance, such as experiences associated with
social anxiety disorder (SAD).
Individuals diagnosed with SAD exhibit chronic, debilitat-
ing impairments in stressful evaluative situations (e.g., dates,
meetings at work, talks with strangers; Stein & Kean, 2000).
Notably, people with SAD display a strong attentional bias for
emotionally negative information and interpret ambiguous
social situations as threatening (Bar-Haim, Lamy, Pergamin,
Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van IJzendoorn, 2007). As we
have shown, arousal reappraisal attenuates threat vigilance,
which may lessen the likelihood that anxious individuals will
experience future situations as threatening. In fact, recently
completed research (Jamieson et al., 2012b) has provided ini-
tial evidence that reappraisal can improve socially anxious
individuals’ responses to evaluative stress. Of course, addi-
tional work is needed to further explore potential clinical
applications, but these initial results are promising.
More broadly, research on psychological treatments has
primarily focused on improving patient outcomes rather than
identifying mechanisms of change (Kazdin, 2011; Kazdin &
Nock, 2003). That is, clinical trials typically test packages of
techniques, not individual components, with careful measure-
ment of immediate outcomes. So, although reappraisal is a
primary component of CBT, we do not necessarily know how
effective reappraisal is itself or, if reappraisal is effective, how
it works. The paradigms and experimental procedures
reviewed here can help researchers test putative mechanisms.
Finally, the translational implications of reappraisal have
yet to be explored. The medical literature suggests that preven-
tion is more effective than curative treatments (Leaf, 1993).
Forestalling disease development is preferred to treating symp-
toms. In the work described here, reappraisal instructions were
sufficient to alter affective, physiological, and cognitive pro-
cesses. Given that adaptive responses to acute stress improve
people’s ability to cope with future stressors (Dienstbier, 1989),
health education might seek to incorporate information about
the functionality of stress. The potential for such an approach
can be seen in research showing that a brief self-affirmation
intervention at the outset of a semester improved students’
classroom performance and reduced racial achievement gaps
months and even years later (Yeager & Walton, 2011).
In sum, recent research on arousal reappraisal has taken
seriously the idea that the body and mind interact reciprocally
and that embodiment effects are situated in a broader context.
Taking this work into a translational arena may have myriad
benefits, including assisting clinical psychologists in identify-
ing mechanisms of change in CBT, providing guidance to orga-
nizational and sports psychologists on improving performance,
helping educational psychologists facilitate learning, and more.
Recommended Reading
Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2010). (See References). A review
of social psychophysiology.
Hofmann, S. G., & Smits, J. A. J. (2008). (See References). A meta-
analysis of CBT.
Jamieson, J. P., Nock, M. K., & Mendes, W. B. (2012a). (See Refer-
ences). An empirical study of the effects of arousal reappraisal on
cardiovascular functioning.
Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2011). (See References). A review of self-
distancing emotion-regulation techniques.
Reappraisal and Acute Stress Reponses 5
Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2008). (See References). A neurosci-
ence-oriented review of reappraisal processes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with
respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.
References
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg,
M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional
bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic
study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.
Barlow, D. H. (2004). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treat-
ment of panic. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Barlow, D. H., & Craske, M. G. (2000). Master your anxiety and
panic: Workbook. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization
and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy Review, 10, 20–46.
Blascovich, J. (1992). A biopsychosocial approach to arousal regula-
tion. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 11, 213–237.
Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2010). Social psychophysiology
and embodiment. In S. T. Fiske & D. T. Gilbert (Eds.), The hand-
book of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 194-227). New York, NY:
Wiley.
Cincotta, A. L., Gehrman, P., Gooneratne, N. S., & Baime, M. J.
(2011). The effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction pro-
gramme on pre-sleep cognitive arousal and insomnia symptoms:
A pilot study. Stress and Health, 27(3), e299-e305.
Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Ohman, A., & Dolan, R.
J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness.
Nature Neuroscience, 7, 189–195.
Dedovic, K., Duchesne, A., Andrews, J., Engert, V., & Pruessner, J. C.
(2009). The brain and the stress axis: The neural correlates of cor-
tisol regulation in response to stress. NeuroImage, 47, 864–871.
Dienstbier, R. A. (1989). Arousal and physiological toughness: Impli-
cations for mental and physical health. Psychological Review, 96,
84–100.
Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regu-
lation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and
physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,
224–237.
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and
social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291.
Hofmann, S. G., & Smits, J. A. J. (2008). Cognitive-behavioral
therapy for adult anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of random-
ized placebo-controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69,
621–632.
Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., Blackstock, E., & Schmader, T.
(2010). Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reapprais-
ing arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Exper-
imental Social Psychology, 46, 208–212.
Jamieson, J. P., Nock, M. K., & Mendes, W. B. (2012a). Mind
over matter: Reappraising arousal improves cardiovascular and
cognitive responses to stress. Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: General, 141, 417–422.
Jamieson, J. P., Nock, M. K., & Mendes, W. B. (2012b). Changing
the conceptualization of stress improves affective and physiologi-
cal outcomes in social anxiety disorder. Manuscript submitted
for publication.
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Evidence-based treatment research: Advances,
limitations, and next steps. American Psychologist, 66, 685–698.
Kazdin, A. E., & Nock, M. K. (2003). Delineating the mechanisms
of change in child and adolescent therapy: Methodological issues
and research recommendations. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 44, 1116–1129.
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The
“Trier Social Stress Test”—A tool for investigating psychobio-
logical stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiol-
ogy, 28, 76–81.
Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2011). Making meaning out of negative
experiences by self-distancing. Current Directions in Psychologi-
cal Science, 20, 187–191.
Leaf, A. (1993). Preventive medicine for our ailing health care sys-
tem. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 616–618.
Levitt, J. T., Brown, T. A., Orsillo, S. M., & Barlow, D. H. (2004). The
effects of acceptance versus suppression of emotion on subjective
and psychophysiological response to carbon dioxide challenge in
patients with panic disorder. Behavior Therapy, 35, 747–766.
Mauss, I. B., Cook, C. L., Cheng, J. Y., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Individ-
ual differences in cognitive reappraisal: Experiential and physi-
ological responses to an anger provocation. International Journal
of Psychophysiology, 66, 116–124.
Mendes, W. B., & Jamieson, J. P. (2011). Embodied stereotype threat:
Exploring brain and body mechanisms underlying performance
impairments. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype
threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 51–68). New York,
NY: Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, J. P., Banaji, M. R., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The link between
social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefron-
tal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1306–1315.
Nater, U. M., & Rohleder, N. (2009). Salivary alpha-amylase as a
non-invasive biomarker for the sympathetic nervous system:
Current state of research. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 486–
496.
Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002).
Rethinking feelings: An fMRI study of the cognitive regulation
of emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1215–1229.
Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Cognitive emotion regulation:
Insights from social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Cur-
rent Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 153–158.
Rohleder, N., Nater, U. M., Wolf, J. M., Ehlert, U., & Kirschbaum, C.
(2004). Psychosocial stress-induced activation of salivary alpha
amylase: An indicator of sympathetic activity? Annals of the New
York Academy of Sciences, 1032, 258–263.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiologi-
cal determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69,
379–399.
Schmader, T., Forbes, C. E., Zhang, S., & Mendes, W. B. (2009). A
metacognitive perspective on the cognitive deficits experienced
in intellectually threatening situations. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 35, 584–596.
6 Jamieson et al.
Stein, M. B., & Kean, Y. M. (2000). Disability and quality of life
in social phobia: Epidemiologic findings. American Journal of
Psychiatry, 157, 1606–1613.
Werner, N. S., Duschek, S., Mattern, M., & Schandry, R. (2009).
Interoceptive sensitivity modulates anxiety during public speak-
ing. Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 85–94.
Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emo-
tional Stoop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin,
120, 3–24.
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological inter-
ventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational
Research, 81, 267–301.
... Perceived stress may impair the individual's capacity to make cognitive evaluations during stress (Eysenck et al., 2007). Studies have shown that better cognitive control reduces COVID-19 stress (Khoo et al., 2021) and supports cognitive reappraisal and emotion regulation skills that are critical for stress regulation (Hoorelbeke et al., 2015;Schmeichel & Tang, 2015), and that better reevaluation processes are associated with lower perceived stress (Jamieson et al., 2013). Therefore, our findings suggest that cognitive control plays a mediating role in the relationship between perceived stress and psychological resilience, helping individuals better regulate stress and maintain resilience in challenging situations. ...
Article
Full-text available
The present study aims to investigate the mediator role of cognitive control and cognitive flexi­bility in the relationship between university students’ perceived stress and their psychological resilience during COVID-19 pandemic. The sample consisted of 405 university students. The findings showed that perceived stress indirectly via cognitive control and cognitive flexibility effects psychological resilience of university students during pandemic. Cognitive control and cognitive flexibility mediates the relationship. The negative effect of perceived stress on cogni­tive control and cognitive flexibility caused a decrease in students’ psychological resilience. The cognitive flexibility has a positive effect on university students’ psychological resilience. Inter­ventions and techniques for stress management can support cognitive control and cognitive flexi­bility of young people under high stress, this may contribute to increasing psychological resili­ence of them. Implications for intervention are discussed.
... When designing stress regulation interventions, it is essential to consider participants' stress mindsets and whether these mindsets prompt the use of avoidant coping techniques. Research has indicated that, rather than solely focusing on reducing stress, interventions could aim to convert stress into a positive experience through cognitive processes (Jamieson et al., 2013). Therefore, a more holistic approach that encompasses both the positive and negative responses to stressful situations could potentially facilitate better regulation of stress responses, and consequently, lead to better health outcomes. ...
Article
Full-text available
The positive and negative beliefs that people hold about stress influence their psychological reactions during stressful situations. In the long term, intense responses to stress can affect health and productivity. This study aims to examine how coping mechanisms mediate the relationship between stress mindset and stress responses. Additionally, its purpose is to provide rich qualitative insight into how individuals respond to stress on behavioural, cognitive, and emotional levels. A total of 238 healthy adults (Mean age: 28.04, SD: 15.55) responded to an online survey. Stress mindset and coping mechanisms were assessed via the Stress Mindset Measure-General (SMM-G) and the brief COPE inventory. Stress responses were assessed via open-ended questions. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed and transformed into quantitative data through content analysis. A mediation analysis was performed to examine the ability of coping mechanisms to mediate the relationship between stress mindset and stress responses. The thematic analysis categorized behavioural, cognitive, and emotional responses to stress. Within those three supraordinate themes, seven themes emerged. The total stress mindset was found to have significant negative relationship with stress response intensity and avoidant coping. Stress response intensity had a significant positive relationship with avoidant coping. Mediation analysis revealed that avoidant coping mechanisms mediated the relationship between stress mindset and responses to stress. Results suggest that adopting a less negative mindset about stress may lead to more beneficial coping mechanisms, which can, in turn, enhance the regulation of stress responses.
... The implicit (and sometimes explicit) assumption in these studies is that people have an initial negative appraisal of the emotional event that then needs to be changed/reframed/reinterpreted. This assumption is quite reasonable when the emotional events are short presentations of vivid emotional imagery (McRae, Ciesielski, et al., 2012), or when the participant is directed to focus on their overall impression of a negative stressor (Jamieson et al., 2013). Our study demonstrates, however, that these assumptions break down when considering complex stressors with multiple elements and when one allows people to thoroughly describe those elements. ...
Article
Full-text available
People often experience positive emotions during predominantly negative stressors, and we hypothesize that one way this occurs is that people make positive appraisals of some elements of the stressors. Further, we hypothesized that people can use these positive appraisals to spontaneously and/or strategically regulate their stress responses. In several studies with online and subject pool convenience samples participants were able to generate unambiguously positive appraisals (as defined in pilot studies 2 and 3) of elements of predominantly negative stressors both when instructed to generate positive appraisals (Study 1) and when instructed to just list elements of their stressors with no instruction on what valence they should be (Studies 3 – 6). Further, just generating these positive appraisals helped participants feel better about a prolonged life stressor (Studies 4, 6) and an acute laboratory stressor (Study 5). We successfully distinguished the emotion regulation strategy of positive ‘up-appraisal’ (elaborating and focusing on positive appraisals) from that of positive ‘alt-appraisal’ (reframing and changing a negative appraisal to be more positive) and showed that positive up-appraisal was more effective at improving stress-related emotions (Study 1,4). Lastly, individual differences in positivity and negative emotionality were the most reliable predictors of generating positive appraisals of stressors. These studies demonstrate that sometimes people can cope successfully with stressors because they are able to separate elements of that stressor, recognize that some of those elements are positive and then elaborate and focus on those positive appraisals.
... It shifts the perception from viewing stress as harmful to seeing it as beneficial [61]. This shift toward a positive stress mindset may be associated with reduced anxiety and negative emotions when encountering stress, potentially lowering physiological arousal [61,62]. Due to reduced arousal and psychological stress, nurses with a stress-enhancing mindset may experience better sleep quality. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Previous studies have shown that overall sleep quality among Chinese nurses is relatively low, with a sleep disorder prevalence rate of approximately 66.4%. Against the backdrop of healthcare reforms, China has been striving to improve the mental health and sleep quality of nurses. Stress mindset can influence how individuals respond to stress, but there is limited research on how stress mindset affects nurses’ sleep quality. This study aims to explore the impact of stress mindset on sleep quality among nurses, as well as the mediating roles of stress overload and anxiety in this relationship. Methods The study was conducted online using a questionnaire from February 18 to February 22, 2024. It utilized the Stress Mindset Measure (SMM), the Stress Overload Scale-Short (SOS-S), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) to survey 441 nurses in three regions of China: Chongqing, Hunan, and Shandong (M = 34.39, SD = 7.82, 95.7% female). A chain mediation model was employed to examine the mediating roles of stress overload and anxiety in the relationship between stress mindset and sleep quality. Results The participants’ average sleep quality score was 7.18 ± 3.47. Nurses’ stress mindset was significantly negatively correlated with both stress overload and anxiety, and significantly positively correlated with sleep quality. Stress overload was significantly positively correlated with anxiety and significantly negatively correlated with sleep quality. Anxiety was also significantly negatively correlated with sleep quality. The direct effect of nurses’ stress mindset on sleep quality was significant (effect size = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.19 to -0.01), as were the indirect effects through stress overload (effect size = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.01) and anxiety (effect size = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.05), along with their chain mediation effect (effect size = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.14 to -0.06). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that a higher level of nurses’ stress mindset is associated with better sleep quality, with stress overload and anxiety mediating this relationship. A positive stress mindset helps nurses cope more effectively with professional challenges and reduces anxiety, leading to improved sleep quality. Healthcare institutions should therefore prioritize fostering positive stress mindsets in nurses, encouraging regular psychological training and workshops to support the development of effective coping strategies.
Article
Full-text available
Individuals embody various social identities that can impact how they interface with the social environment. Stigma theories suggest that members of low-status or marginalized groups possess devalued social identities, and therefore, experience more stress. While social identities can lead to increased stress, individuals’ appraisals of their identities are not necessarily perceived as harmful/demanding. Rather, social identities can also be appraised as resources or sources of strength bringing opportunities and facilitating goal attainment. Using the biopsychosocial (BPS) model of challenge and threat as a conceptual foundation, this research developed a novel measure to assess individuals’ appraisals of their social identities. In Study 1 (N = 575), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the theorized factor structure (i.e., resource and demand appraisals) and assessed the overall fit of the model. Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested for associations between the resource and demand latent factors. Individuals appraising their ethnic-racial identity as a resource exhibited improved self and intergroup outcomes, while those perceiving it as a demand reported worse self-based and intergroup outcomes, as well as more distress. Study 2 (N = 743 Black and White Americans), which was preregistered, examined group differences in appraisals of ethnic-racial identity. SEM revealed that Black participants were more likely than White participants to appraise their ethnic-racial identity as demanding, leading to worse social and intergroup outcomes. Even when Black participants perceived their ethnic-racial identity as a resource, they still reported higher levels of discrimination, intergroup anxiety, and behavioral avoidance compared to their White counterparts. Implications for theory development and application to the stress literature are discussed.
Article
Anxiety symptoms are among the most prevalent mental health disorders in adolescents, highlighting the need for scalable and accessible interventions. As anxiety often co-occurs with perceived stress during adolescence, stress interventions may offer a promising approach to reducing anxiety. Previous stress interventions have largely focused on the view that stress is harmful, aiming to manage and mitigate its negative effects. Stress optimization presents a novel intervention perspective, suggesting that stress can also lead to positive outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether stress optimization can effectively reduce anxiety symptoms in adolescents. We developed a single-session stress optimization intervention and investigated the conditions under which it was most effective. A large-scale randomized controlled trial was conducted (N = 1779, aged 12–18 years), with participants reporting their perceived stress, stress mindset, and anxiety over a two-month follow-up period. Machine learning is a promising approach for assessing personalized intervention effects. Conservative Bayesian causal forest analysis was employed to detect both treatment and heterogeneous intervention effects. The findings revealed that the intervention effectively reduced anxiety symptoms in the school context over a two-month follow-up (0.87 posterior probability). Furthermore, adolescents with higher anxiety and perceived stress at baseline experienced the most significant reductions in anxiety outcomes (standard deviations of −0.18 and −0.11 respectively). The single-session stress optimization intervention demonstrated potential for cost-effective scaling.
Chapter
Full-text available
Emotions play a vital role in the process of making health-related decisions. From choosing a healthy lifestyle to deciding on medical treatments, emotions influence our behavior, perceptions, and even physical well-being. Patients who approach their treatment with a hopeful mindset tend to experience better outcomes compared to those who succumb to despair or pessimism. The complex interplay between emotions and cognitive processes shapes our choices and actions in ways that are often underestimated but profound. Empathy and compassion, on the other hand, are emotions that can foster supportive relationships between healthcare providers and patients, ultimately enhancing treatment adherence and outcomes. Recognizing and managing emotions effectively is crucial for making sound health decisions. In conclusion, emotions play a multifaceted role in shaping health decision-making processes. By understanding the influence of emotions, acknowledging their impact, and learning to manage them effectively, individuals can make informed choices that promote their overall wellbeing and treatment outcomes.
Book
Full-text available
Dieses Buch untersucht die komplexen und facettenreichen Beziehungen zwischen Leid und Wachstum durch die Linse der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit. Ziel ist es, ein tiefgehendes Verständnis der Mechanismen zu entwickeln, die es Individuen ermöglichen, durch Herausforderungen gestärkt hervorzugehen. Anhand theoretischer Konzepte, empirischer Studien und praktischer Beispiele wird beleuchtet, wie Willenskraft, Disziplin und soziale Unterstützung zur Resilienz beitragen und wie diese Fähigkeiten durch verschiedene Lebensbereiche hindurch Anwendung finden. Besondere Aufmerksamkeit wird der Rolle von Coping-Strategien, Persönlichkeitsentwicklung, Stressbewältigung und Suchtprävention gewidmet. Durch eine integrative Perspektive, die biologische, psychologische und soziale Faktoren berücksichtigt, bietet das Buch umfassende Einblicke und praktische Ansätze zur Förderung der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit und des persönlichen Wachstums.
Article
Purpose: Online fraud has become a serious problem around the world. To reduce the harm it causes to society and individuals, this study aims to explore the emotional state of victims during the victimization process through text sentiment analysis to provide a basis for targeted fraud prevention. Methods: We crawled 1217 valid posts from the Zhihu and Douban platforms, which were posted by online fraud victims and described their experiences of being defrauded. We divided the narrative texts into the different stages of being defrauded and analyzed the texts using a lexicon-based sentiment analysis method. Results: The results showed that victims in the early stage of being defrauded more often experienced the emotions of expectation and love; in the middle stage, they experienced more anxiety and expectation; and in the late stage, they experienced more expectation and disgust. There were also differences in the emotional experience of victims among different types of fraud. Conclusions: This study uses data from social media sources to explore the emotional experience of victims at different stages of fraud victimization process in the Chinese context, which provides a non-Western perspective for fraud victimization research and lays a foundation for future research on whole-process fraud intervention.
Article
Full-text available
Using a process model of emotion, a distinction between antecedent-focused and response-focused emotion regulation is proposed. To test this distinction, 120 participants were shown a disgusting film while their experiential, behavioral, and physiological responses were recorded. Participants were told to either (a) think about the film in such a way that they would feel nothing (reappraisal, a form of antecedent-focused emotion regulation), (b) behave in such a way that someone watching them would not know they were feeling anything (suppression, a form of response-focused emotion regulation), or (c) watch the film (a control condition). Compared with the control condition, both reappraisal and suppression were effective in reducing emotion-expressive behavior. However, reappraisal decreased disgust experience, whereas suppression increased sympathetic activation. These results suggest that these 2 emotion regulatory processes may have different adaptive consequences.
Article
Full-text available
Attentional bias is a central feature of many cognitive theories of psychopathology. One of the most frequent methods of investigating such bias has been an emotional analog of the Stroop task. In this task, participants name the colors in which words are printed, and the words vary in their relevance to each theme of psychopathology. The authors review research showing that patients are often slower to name the color of a word associated with concerns relevant to their clinical condition. They address the causes and mechanisms underlying the phenomenon, focusing on J. D. Cohen, K. Dunbar, and J. L. McClelland's (1990) parallel distributed processing model.
Article
Full-text available
From W. B. Cannon’s identification of adrenaline with “fight or flight” to modern views of stress, negative views of peripheral physiological arousal predominate. Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) arousal is associated with anxiety, neuroticism, the Type A personality, cardiovascular disease, and immune system suppression; illness susceptibility is associated with life events requiring adjustments. “Stress control” has become almost synonymous with arousal reduction. A contrary positive view of peripheral arousal follows from studies of subjects exposed to intermittent stressors. Such exposure leads to low SNS arousal base rates, but to strong and responsive challenge- or stress-induced SNS-adrenal-medullary arousal, with resistance to brain catecholamine depletion and with suppression of pituitary adrenal-cortical responses. That pattern of arousal defines physiological toughness and, in interaction with psychological coping, corresponds with positive performance in even complex tasks, with emotional stability, and with immune system enhancement. The toughness concept suggests an opposition between effective short- and long-term coping, with implications for effective therapies and stress-inoculating life-styles.
Article
Full-text available
In the article by S. Schachter and J. Singer, which appeared in Psychological Review (1962, 69(5), 379-399) the following corrections should be made: The superscript "a" should precede the word "All" in the footnote to Table 2. The superscript "a" should appear next to the column heading "Initiates" in Table 3. The following Tables 6-9 should be substituted for those which appeared in print. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 196306064-001.) It is suggested that emotional states may be considered a function of a state of physiological arousal and of a cognition appropriate to this state of arousal. From this follows these propositions: (a) Given a state of physiological arousal for which an individual has no immediate explanation, he will label this state and describe his feelings in terms of the cognitions available to him. (b) Given a state of physiological arousal for which an individual has a completely appropriate explanation, no evaluative needs will arise and the individual is unlikely to label his feelings in terms of the alternative cognitions available. (c) Given the same cognitive circumstances, the individual will react emotionally or describe his feelings as emotions only to the extent that he experiences a state of physiological arousal. An experiment is described which, together with the results of other studies, supports these propositions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Recent randomized experiments have found that seemingly “small” social-psychological interventions in education—that is, brief exercises that target students’ thoughts, feelings, and beliefs in and about school—can lead to large gains in student achievement and sharply reduce achievement gaps even months and years later. These interventions do not teach students academic content but instead target students’ psychology, such as their beliefs that they have the potential to improve their intelligence or that they belong and are valued in school. When social-psychological interventions have lasting effects, it can seem surprising and even “magical,” leading people either to think of them as quick fixes to complicated problems or to consider them unworthy of serious consideration. The present article discourages both responses. It reviews the theoretical basis of several prominent social-psychological interventions and emphasizes that they have lasting effects because they target students’ subjective experiences in school, because they use persuasive yet stealthy methods for conveying psychological ideas, and because they tap into recursive processes present in educational environments. By understanding psychological interventions as powerful but context-dependent tools, educational researchers will be better equipped to take them to scale. This review concludes by discussing challenges to scaling psychological interventions and how these challenges may be overcome.
Article
Full-text available
Recent developments in the study of cognitive emotion regulation illustrate how functional imaging is extending behavioral analyses. Imaging studies have contributed to the development of a multilevel model of emotion regulation that describes the interactions between neural systems implicated in emotion generation and those implicated in emotional control. In this article, we review imaging studies of one type of cognitive emotion regulation: reappraisal. We show how imaging studies have contributed to the construction of this model, illustrate the interplay of psychological theory and neuroscience data in its development, and describe how this model can be used as the basis for future basic and translational research.
Article
Both common wisdom and findings from multiple areas of research suggest that it is helpful to understand and make meaning out of negative experiences. However, people’s attempts to do so often backfire, leading them to ruminate and feel worse. Here we attempt to shed light on these seemingly contradictory sets of findings by examining the role that self-distancing plays in facilitating adaptive self-reflection. We begin by briefly describing the “self-reflection paradox.” We then define self-distancing, present evidence from multiple levels of analysis that illustrate how this process facilitates adaptive self-reflection, and discuss the basic science and practical implications of this research.