ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Ostrich meat is a niche product gaining popularity among consumers especially in Europe. Nutrient composition of this meat considering protein, amino acids, fat, cholesterol, fatty acids, minerals and vitamins was henceforth assessed. Ostrich meat is characterized by low intramuscular fat content, a favourable fatty acids profile (PUFA/SFA and n-6/n-3 ratios), a high content of iron and vitamin E and low of Na. Thus, it can be considered as a high quality product of high nutritive and dietetic value. It may thus be a valuable component of human diet.
Content may be subject to copyright.
89
Animal Science Papers and Reports vol. 29 (2011) no. 2, 89-97
Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Jastrzębiec, Poland
The ostrich meat – an updated review.
II. Nutritive value*
Ewa Poławska1, Joanna Marchewka1, Ross Gordon Cooper2,
Katarzyna Sartowska1, Janusz Pomianowski3, Artur Jóźwik1,
Nina Strzałkowska1, Jarosław Olav Horbańczuk1,**
1 Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding,
Jastrzębiec, 05-552 Wolka Kosowska, Poland
2 Eurohouse, Dog Kennel Lane, Walsall WS1 2 BU, England, UK
3 Department of Food Science, University of Warmia and Mazury,
10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
(Received September 9, 2010; accepted January 10, 2011)
Ostrich meat is a niche product gaining popularity among consumers especially in Europe. Nutrient
composition of this meat considering protein, amino acids, fat, cholesterol, fatty acids, minerals and
vitamins was henceforth assessed. Ostrich meat is characterized by low intramuscular fat content,
a favourable fatty acids prole (PUFA/SFA and n-6/n-3 ratios), a high content of iron and vitamin
E and low of Na. Thus, it can be considered as a high quality product of high nutritive and dietetic
value. It may thus be a valuable component of human diet.
KEY WORDS: cholesterol / fatty acids / meat / minerals /ostrich / vitamins
*Conceptualized and realized within the project “BIOFOOD”- innovative, functional products of animal
origin no.POIG.01.01.02-014-090/09 co-nanced by the European Union from the European Regional
Development Fund within the Innovative Economy Operational Programme 2007-2013.
**Corresponding author:olav@rocketmail.com
90
Introduction
Ostrich meat is recognized as a valuable product of high nutritive and dietetic
value making these birds important for many livestock industries [Sales et al. 1999,
Horbańczuk 2002, Cooper et al. 2004, 2008, Cooper and Horbańczuk 2004]. Demand
for such products in Europe has recently increased especially also among consumers
who pay a greater attention to the quality of consumed products [Cooper et al. 2007,
Horbańczuk et al. 2007, 2008]. Nowadays, the modern consumer wants to be sure of
the nutrient composition of food that is bought for consumption. According to Fasone
and Privitera [2002] a consumer of ostrich meat is a medium-to-high cultural and
professional status person, dened as a “modern attentive consumer” aged 41-50,
principally women, with a purchasing behaviour essentially related to nutritive value,
safety of the product, intrinsic characteristics and taste. It should be emphasised
that nowadays consumers also appreciate “naturalness” and safety of ostrich meat
produced from birds with almost natural methods, excluding the use of technologies
such as intensive fattening or antibiotics administration. It is important also for them
that ostriches are usually kept in sustainable production systems with consideration
of high animal welfare standards. However, ostrich meat in Europe is still a niche
product unknown by many people, but it is appreciated by most of consumers who
tasted it. Unfortunately, until now the current knowledge of the nutritive value of this
meat is still limited. Therefore, the present review was prepared in order to compile
scientic data about nutritive value of ostrich meat including its benets for human
health.
Nutrients of ostrich meat
According to Hoffman et al. [2005] meat from ostriches fed a standard diet contains
21.65, 1.95 and 1.2% protein, fat and ash, respectively. Similar values regarding
especially to protein and ash were recently reported by Majewska et al. [2009]. In
their studies 10 different muscles were compared and all of them had similar content
of dry matter (23.3-24.5%), protein (20.6-21.7%) and ash (1.07-1.17%). In turn,
fat content is more differentiated among muscles (0.90-1.34%) Table 1 (selected
muscles) – being lower than in other species (beef – 4.6% or chicken – 4.3% [Sales
2002]). It should be noted that in a study by Sales [2002] the fat content of ostrich
meat was lower and varied from 0.2 to 0.71g/100g of edible meat, but as emphasized
by Majewska et al [2009] the lipid content depends on the method of the analysis,
with different solvents used for extraction causing different results [Jensen 2004].
Additionally, according to Sales [2002] meat from older ostriches (10-12 months
at slaughter) contains more fat and dry matter than from respective younger ones
(8 months), especially with regard to m. ambiens, m. iliobularis and m. iliotibialis
lateralis.
E. Poławska et al.
91
The amino acids composition of ostrich meat in comparison to beef and chicken
meat is shown in Table 2. As regard either essential or non-essential amino acids
content in ostrich meat is generally similar to other meat types except for histidine
and serine.
The intramuscular fat content is one of the most important factors inuencing
consumers’ choice with regards to meat type. In other species, e.g. in pigs, the last
thirty years of breeding was dedicated to improve the quality of meat by lowering its
fat content [Kouba et al. 1999, Pascual et al. 2007, Raj et al. 2010]. Ostrich meat is
“naturally improved” meat because of its low content of intramuscular fat. This type of
meat is recommended for overweight people and for those who suffer from coronary
heart disease. On the other hand, low fat content is related to lowered juiciness of meat
[Cooper 1999]. Thus, during cooking, the fat content increase and causes decrease in
moisture [Sales et al. 1996].
The most important factor affecting fat content of meat is feeding. From studies
on other species it is known that not only composition of a diet and addition of fat to
the diet inuences fat content of meat. Also the level of energy and protein (amino
Physical characteristics of ostrich meat
Table 1. Chemical composition (g/100 g edible portion) of ostrich meat [Sales, 2002 and
Majewska et al. 2009] as influenced by muscle and birds’ age
Age (months)
Component
(%)
Muscle
Sales [2002]
8
10
12
10-12
gastrocnemius
22.27
22.23
22.43
femorotibialis medius
22.39
22.80
22.89
ambiens
23.84
24.33
24.18
iliofibularis
22.21
22.48
22.63
iliotibialis lateralis
23.41
24.09
24.27
Dry matter
iliofemoralis
24.30
24.99
25.09
gastrocnemius
20.63
20.44
20.72
femorotibialis medius
20.34
20.71
20.42
ambiens
21.55
21.23
21.51
iliofibularis
20.05
21.85
20.99
iliotibialis lateralis
21.07
21.36
21.37
Protein
iliofemoralis
21.53
22.22
21.94
gastrocnemius
0.26
0.20
0.21
femorotibialis medius
0.33
0.33
0.28
ambiens
0.35
0.53
0.47
iliofibularis
0.39
0.42
0.50
iliotibialis lateralis
0.33
0.36
0.45
Fat
iliofemoralis
0.71
0.66
0.66
gastrocnemius
1.15
1.21
1.17
femorotibialis medius
1.09
1.06
1.20
ambiens
1.10
1.16
1.11
iliofibularis
1.09
1.16
1.11
iliotibialis lateralis
1.20
1.20
1.24
Ash
iliofemoralis
1.10
1.23
1.19
92
acids, especially lysine) can change its content. This was similarly concluded by Sales
[1997] who fed ostriches with a high-energy and low-protein diet and found that high
energy/protein ratio leads to elevated fat content of meat.
Cholesterol content and fatty acids composition
At the beginning ostrich meat was recognized as a meat almost “free” of
cholesterol. However, further research showed, that its cholesterol content is similar
to that of beef and chicken meat (59 and 57 mg/100 g, respectively). Cholesterol
content of ostrich meat has been reported as 57 mg/100 g tissue [Sales and Oliver-
Lyons 1996], 65-68 mg/100 g [Horbańczuk and Sales 1998, Horbańczuk et al. 1998]
and 83 mg/100 g [Cooper 1999]. The cholesterol content differed among the types of
fat. Horbańczuk et al. [2004] found much higher level in backfat (74.33 mg/100 g)
than in breast fat (49.50 mg/100 g). Probably the initial conclusion was made due to
the low intramuscular fat content of ostrich meat which content is poorly correlated
to cholesterol content. Cholesterol is mainly situated in cell membranes as structural
components. After information, that cholesterol is stored in some blood vessels of
persons suffering from arteriosclerosis and thus contributes to heart infarct cholesterol
phobia is a common phenomenon especially in the developed countries.
By comparison with other species, e.g. chicken and beef, ostrich meat shows a
benecial fatty acids prole [Sales and Horbańczuk 1998], with differences in the
fat type therein. The highest content of saturated fatty acids (SFA) was afrmed
of abdominal fat (46.7%) – Hoffman et al. 2005], lower in muscles (<39.8%) –
Horbańczuk et al. 1998, Hoffman et al. 2005 and the lowest in backfat and breast fat
E. Poławska et al.
Table 2. Amino acids content (g/100 g edible portion) of ostrich meat compared
to beef and chicken [based on Sales 2002]
Item
Ostrich meat
Beef
Chicken meat
Essential amino acids
threonine
0.76
0.92
0.90
isoleucine
0.92
0.95
1.13
leucine
1.70
1.56
1.61
lysine
1.65
1.74
1.82
methionine
0.55
0.54
0.59
phenylalanine
0.94
0.82
0.85
histidine
0.39
0.72
0.66
valine
0.97
1.02
1.06
Non-essential amino acids
tyrosine
0.61
0.70
0.72
arginine
1.36
1.32
1.29
alanine
1.06
1.26
1.17
aspartic acid
1.90
1.91
1.91
glutamic acid
2.51
3.15
3.20
glycine
0.82
1.14
1.05
serine
0.59
0.80
0.74
93
(31.8-32.2% of the total FA) – Horbańczuk et al. [2004]. Opposite order was reported
within polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), although all types of fat showed very high
PUFA content (23.5-38.6%). Ostrich meat has a benecial PUFA/SFA ratio, which is
above 0.5 and riches very high values, even 1.2 (Tab. 3). WHO [2003] recommends
the ratio of above 0.4, so ostrich meat and fat with its values can be considered pro-
healthy. Also the n-6/n-3 ratio is usually on the level recommended by WHO [2003]
below 4. The relatively high total n-3 fatty acids content of ostrich meat (above 8 %),
would thus be advantageous in promoting the product, since intake of n-3 fatty acids
reduces incidence of coronary disease and are essential in growth and development of
man throughout the life cycle and seem to be more effective in their antithrombotic and
antiatheorgenic properties than the corresponding n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Hoffman et al. [2005] revealed that the iliobularis muscle in the ostrich has a
high content (%) of palmitic (21.73), oleic (21.15), linoleic (18.06) and stearic acid
(14.08). Also Horbańczuk et al. [1998] reported high content of palmitic (25.93-
27.11%), oleic (25.02- 28.33%), linoleic (10.09-10.58%) and linolenic acid (16.75-
22.17%) of ostrich meat. Similar results were reported by Horbańczuk et al. [1998] and
Giorlami et al. [2003] in m. gastrocnemius, although they revealed a higher content of
oleic acid (29.36-33.25%). In ostrich meat, the contents (per cent) of acids important
from the consumer point of view (arachidonic AA, eicosapentaenoic– EPA and
docosaheksaenoic – DHA) were found higher than in ostrich fat (6.15 vs 1.95, 1.21
vs 0.16, 1.22 vs 0.21, respectively [Hoffman et al. 2005]. However, in both cases the
Physical characteristics of ostrich meat
Table 3. Fatty acids profile (% of total fatty acids) of ostrich muscles according to different authors
Musculus iliofibularis
Musculus gastrocnemius
Acid
Hoffman
et al. [2005]
Horbańczuk
et al. [1998]
Giorlami
et al. [2003]
Horbańczuk
et al. [1998]
Giorlami
et al. [2003]
14:0
0.75
1.23
0.70
0.97
0.48
16:0
21.73
20.57
22.89
22.35
17.48
18:0
14.08
13.15
8.87
13.66
11.02
Total SFA
39.73
35.18
33.31
37.24
29.88
16:1 n-7
3.51
4.67
7.20
5.62
5.84
18:1 n-9
21.15
30.97
31.58
33.25
29.36
Total MUFA
27.27
35.57
39.05
39.09
35.52
18:2 n-6
18.06
15.61
16.24
14.18
16.63
18:3 n-3
5.76
5.68
2.14
1.55
1.50
20:4 n-6
6.15
5.62
6.50
5.81
11.34
20:5 n-3
1.21
0.42
0.28
0.35
0.54
22:5 n-3
-
0.86
0.74
0.92
1.40
22:6 n-3
1.22
0.73
0.21
0.83
0.39
Total PUFA
32.99
26.93
27.64
23.65
34.60
P/S
0.83
0.77
0.83
0.64
1.16
n-6/n-3
3.02
3.16
7.57
7.38
8.31
SFA – saturated fatty acids; MUFA – monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA – polyunsaturated fatty acids;
P/S – PUFA to SFA ratio; n-6/n-3 – PUFA omega 6 to PUFA omega 3 ratio.
94
content was much higher than in other meats, e.g. pork [Enser et al. 1996]. Giorlami et
al. [2003] found difference between gastrocnemius and iliobularis muscle in content
of AA (11.34 vs 6.50%), EPA (0.54 vs 0.28%) and DPA (1.40 vs 0.74%).
Further research is required explaining the metabolism of fat and fatty acids in
the ostrich digestive tract as well as metabolism of fatty acids on the cellular level.
This can be closely linked with histo-morphological analyses, selective staining and
protein marker evaluations. The role of the hepatic and biliary system in the processing
of lipids is also integral to such studies.
Minerals
Meat in human diet is considered an important source of protein and minerals,
especially iron and zinc. In the research of Lombardi-Boccia et al. [2002], Karklina
and Kivite [2007] and Majewska et al. [2009] raw ostrich meat was found to be rich in
total iron (2.32- 4.02 mg/100 g). In general, ostrich meat has the highest content of iron
from all meat sources available for humans, e.g. beef or chicken (1.93, 0.4-0.7 mg/100
g, respectively). Thus, it can be an important source of iron for anaemic patients as
well as for pregnant women [Cooper 1999] and complements metabolic and cellular
processes including activities in leukocytes. Iron is essential for haematopoiesis.
Zinc levels of raw ostrich meat evaluated by Lombardi-Boccia et al. [2005] varied
between different carcass cuts: 3.1 mg/100 g of leg and signicantly less in sirloin
and llet (2.5 and 1.96 mg/100 g respectively). These levels were still higher than in
other poultry meats: 1.71, 0.65, 2.47, and 1.08 mg/100 g of chicken thigh, chicken
breast, turkey thigh and turkey breast, respectively. However, zinc concentrations in
beef sirloin and beef llet were higher: 4.09 and 4.01 mg/100 g, respectively. Levels
of zinc in ostrich meat evaluated by Majewska et al. [2009] varied between 2.02 and
4.30 mg/100 g in different muscles.
Copper levels determined in raw ostrich meat by Majewska et al. [2009] ranged
from 0.103 to 0.187 mg/100 g. In other species levels of copper were lower: 0.07-
0.09, 0.05 and 0.06 mg/100 g of beef, chicken and turkey, respectively. In turn, calcium
reached a maximum value of 5.62 mg/100 g of meat comparable to 6 mg/100 g recorded
for beef, but considerably lower than chicken meat (12 mg/100 g of edible meat).
Very low sodium content of ostrich meat (32-36 mg/100 g) compared to beef (63
mg/100 g) or chicken (77 mg/100 g) would be advantageous for people who have to
consume a low sodium diet, for example those suffering from hypertension [Cooper
1999].
Majewska et al. [2009] evaluated mineral content of meat samples collected from
ten different ostrich muscles. The selected results are presented in Table 4. Compared
to other species ostrich meat is more similar to beef than to chicken meat.
E. Poławska et al.
95
Vitamins
Information about the content of vitamins in ostrich meat is still very limited.
There are only some incomplete data on this area and there is a need, therefore, for
research aiming at the elaboration of the prole of vitamins of the ostrich meat.
Physical characteristics of ostrich meat
Table 4. Minerals of selected ostrich muscles compared to beef and meat of chicken
Ostrich meat
1
Minerals
(mg/100 g)
m. gastrocnemius
m. obturatorius
m. iliofibularis
Beef
2
Chicken meat
2
Macroelements
calcium
5.45
5.15
5.62
6
12
potassium
243
244
240
358
229
magnesium
24.3
25.3
23.8
23
25
sodium
36.1
38.7
32.6
63
77
phosphorus
216
224
210
201
173
Microelements
iron
2.88
3.04
2.32
2.2
0.9
copper
0.116
0.162
0.108
0.08
0.05
zinc
3.55
2.29
2.43
4.4
1.5
manganese
0.012
0.017
0.012
0.01
0.02
1
Majewska et al. [2009].
2
Sales and Oliver-Lyons [1996].
Table 5. Vitamin content of ostrich meat compared to beef and chicken
[Karklina and Kivite 2007]
Vitamin (mg/100 g)
Ostrich meat
Beef
Chicken meat
B1
0.220
0.178
0.140
B2
0.098
0.087
0.066
B5
11.45
10.60
8.32
B6 (mg/kg)
0.225
0.125
1.5
B12 (µg/kg)
12.5
0.100
0.05
E (mg/100g)
9.1
6.2
7.5
Levels of vitamins (Tab. 5), especially of group B, were determined in ostrich
meat and compared to other species by Lombardi-Boccia et al. [2005] and Karklina
and Kivite [2007]. Thiamine (vit. B1) levels were found higher in ostrich than in beef
or chicken meat. Riboavin (vit. B2) and pantothenic acid (vit. B5) levels occurred
similar in ostrich meat and in beef, while chicken meat was lower in vitamins B2 and
B5. Also niacin (vit. B3) content of ostrich meat was found similar to that of beef,
while chicken meat contained more of this vitamin. Level of pyridoxine (vit. B6) in
ostrich meat was found twice as high as in beef or in chicken. The marked difference
was noticed in the case of cobalamine (vit. B12), the content of which was over 10
times higher than in beef, and even more when compared to chicken. In conclusion,
ostrich meat as a source of B group vitamins is generally comparable to beef, with a
much higher level of vitamins B6 and B12.
Another important factor found in meat is vitamin E, considered one of the most
effective natural antioxidants. As determined by Karklina and Kivite [2007], content
96
of vitamin E was highest of ostrich meat (9.1 mg/100 g), followed by chicken meat
(7.5 mg/100 g) and beef (6.2 mg/100 g).
Conclusion
Ostrich meat is a niche product characterized by a low intramuscular fat content,
favourable fatty acids prole ( PUFA/SFA and n-6/n-3 ratios) and high content of iron
and vitamin E. The lack of a culinary tradition and relatively high price are reasons for
which ostrich meat will not replace beef, pork or chicken as a staple meat in Europe.
It may, however, as a high quality product, be a valuable supplement of human diet.
REFERENCEC
COOPER R.G., 1999 – Ostrich meat, an important product of the ostrich industry: a southern African
perspective. World’s Poultry Science Journal 55, 389-402.
COOPER R.G., HORBAŃCZUK J.O., 2002 – The anatomical and physiological characteristics of
ostrich (Struthio camelus var.domesticus) meat determine its nutritional importance for man. Animal
Science Journal 73, 167-173.
COOPER R.G., HORBAŃCZUK J.O., 2004 – Ostrich nutrition: a review from a Zimbabwean
perspective. Revue Scientique et Technique de L Ofce International Des Epizooties 23, 1033-
1042.
COOPER R.G., HORBAŃCZUK J.O., FUJHARA N., 2004 – Nutrition and feed management in the
ostrich (Struthio camelus domesticus). Animal Science Journal 75, 175-181.
COOPER R.G., TOMASIK C., HORBAŃCZUK J.O., 2007 – Avian inuenza in ostriches (Struthio
camelus). Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 18(3), 87-92.
COOPER R.G., NARANOWICZ H., MALISZEWSKA E., TENNETT A., HORBAŃCZUK J.O.,
2008 – Sex-based comparison of limb segmentation in ostriches aged 14 months with and without
tibiotarsal rotation. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 79, 142-144.
ENSER M., HALLETT K., HEWITT B., FURSEY G.A.J., WOOD J.D., 1996 – Fatty acid content
and composition of English beef, lamb and pork at retail. Meat Science 42, 443-456.
FASONE V., PRIVITERA D., 2002 – Analysis and market perspectives of ostrich meat in Italy.
Proceedings of World Ostrich Congress, Warsaw, 26-29 September,169-180.
GIORLAMI A., MARISCO I., D’ANDREA G., BRAGHIERI A., NAPOLITANO F., CIFUNI G.F.,
2003 – Fatty acid prole, cholesterol content and tenderness of ostrich meat as inuenced by age at
slaughter and muscle type. Meat Science 64, 309-315.
HOFFMAN L.C., JOUBERT M., BRAND T.S., MANLEY M., 2005 – The effect of dietary sh oil
rich in n-3 fatty acids on the organoleptic, fatty acid and physicochemical characteristics of ostrich
meat. Meat Science 70, 45-53.
HORBAŃCZUK J.O., 2002 – The Ostrich. European Ostrich Group, Denmark, pp.176.
HORBAŃCZUK J.O., KAWKA M., SACHARCZUK M., COOPER R.G., BORUSZEWSKA K.,
PARADA P., JASZCZAK K., 2007 A search for sequence similarity between chicken (Gallus
domesticus) and ostrich (Struthio camelus) microsatellite markers. Animal Science Papers and
Reports 25, 283-288.
HORBAŃCZUK J.O., MALECKI I., COOPER R.G., JÓŹWIK A., KLEWIEC J., KRZYŻEWSKI
J., KALIFA H., CHYLIŃSKI W., WÓJCIK A., KAWKA M., 2004 – Cholesterol content and fatty
acid composition of two fat depots from slaughter ostriches (Struthio camelus) aged 14 months.
Animal Science Papers and Reports 22, 247-251.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
E. Poławska et al.
97
HORBAŃCZUK J.O., SALES J., 1998 – Lipid and cholesterol content and fatty acid composition
of meat obtained from ostriches reared on a commercial farm. Animal Science Papers and Reports
16, 51-55.
HORBAŃCZUK J., SALES J., CELEDA T., KONECKA A., ZIEBA G., KAWKA P., 1998 –
Cholesterol Content and Fatty Acid Composition of Ostrich Meat as Inuence by Subspecies. Meat
Science 50, 385-388.
HORBAŃCZUK J.O., TOMASIK C., COOPER R.G., 2008 – Ostrich farming in Poland - its history
and current situation after accession to the European Union. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews
1(2), 65-71.
JENSEN W.K., 2004 – Chemical and physical characteristics of meat: Adipose tissue. In C. Devine
& M. Dikeman (Eds.) Encyclopedia of meat sciences, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd 1, 233-234.
KARKLINA D., KIVITE J., 2007 – The nutritional value of ostrich meat produced in Latvia.
Proceedings of the XIV World Ostrich Congress. Riga, Latvia, 19-20 October, 83-85.
KOUBA M., BONNEAU M., NOBLET J., 1999 Relative development of subcutaneous,
intermuscular, and kidney fat in growing pigs with different body composition. Journal of Animal
Science 77, 622-629.
LOMBARDI-BOCCIA G., MARTINEZ DOMINGUEZ B., AGUZZI A., 2002 – Total heme and
non-heme iron in Raw and cooked meats. Journal of Food Science 67, 1738-1741.
LOMBARDI-BOCCIA G., MARTINEZ DOMINGUEZ B., AGUZZI A., 2005 Total aspects of
meat quality: trace elements and B vitamins in raw and cooked meats. Journal of Food Composition
and Analysis 18, 39-46.
MAJEWSKA D., JAKUBOWSKA M., LIGOCKI M., TARASEWICZ Z., SZCZERBIŃSKA D.,
KARAMUCKI T., SALES J., 2009 – Physicochemical characteristics, proximate analysis and
mineral composition of ostrich meat as inuenced by muscle. Food Chemistry 117, 207-211.
PASCUAL J.V., RAFECAS M., CANELA M.A., BOATELLA J., BOU R., BARROETA A.C.,
CODONY R., 2007 – Effect of increasing amounts of a linoleic-rich dietary fat on the fat composition
of four pig breeds. Part II:Fatty acid composition in muscle and fat tissues. Food Chemistry 100,
1639-1648.
RAJ S., SKIBA G., WEREMKO D., FANDREJEWSKI H., MIGDAŁ W., BOROWIEC F.,
POŁAWSKA E., 2010 – The relationship between the chemical composition of the carcass and the
fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat and backfat of several pig breeds slaughtered at different
weights. Meat Science 86, 324-330.
SALES J., 1996 – Histological, biophysical, physical and chemical characteristics of different ostrich
muscles. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 70, 109-114.
SALES J., 1997 – Effect of cooking on the quality of ostrich muscles. Journal of Food Science and
Technology 34, 501-502.
SALES J., 2002 – Ostrich meat research: an update. Proceedings of World Ostrich Congress, Warsaw,
Poland, September 26-29, pp. 148-160.
SALES J., HORBANCZUK J., 1998 – Ratite Meat. World’s Poultry Science Journal 54, 59-67.
SALES J., HORBAŃCZUK J.O., DINGLE J., COLEMAN R., SENSIK S., 1999 – Carcase
characteristics of emus (Dromaius novaehollandiae). British Poultry Science 40, 145-147.
SALES J., MARAIS D., KRUGER M., 1996 – Fat content, caloric value, cholesterol content, and
fatty acid composition of raw and cooked ostrich meat. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
9, 85-89.
SALES J., OLIVER-LYONS B., 1996 – Ostrich meat: a review. Food Australia 48, 504-511.
WHO/FAO, 2003 – Diet Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. WHO, Geneve, 4-101.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Physical characteristics of ostrich meat
... This calculation yielded values of 49.82 kg for Group 1, 54.50 kg for Group 2, and 54.22 kg for Group 3. It can thus be inferred that the slaughter yield and, consequently, the performance of the ostriches in Groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than in Group 1. The studies conducted by Morris et al. [24] and Polowska et al. [39] on the carcass yield of ostriches yielded partially higher values. The analysis of 14 animals aged 10-14 months and with an average live weight of 95.5 kg yielded a mean slaughter weight of 54.57 ...
... kg and a slaughter yield of 58.6% in the study conducted by Morris et al. [24]. The investigations conducted by Polowska et al. [39] yielded comparable results, with a slaughter yield of 49.0% and an average carcass weight of 47.6 kg at a live weight of 99.7 kg. In a study conducted by Bessei [31], a decline in slaughter yield was observed with increasing stocking density, although the reduction was relatively minor. ...
Article
Full-text available
Regarding the ongoing global development of commercial ostrich husbandry, it is necessary to establish science-based recommendations for the appropriate treatment and welfare of ostriches. In this study, we determined the minimum housing area required for ostriches aged between 6 and 15 months. The planimetry revealed that the animals in this age group cover an average area of 0.31 m² to 0.57 m² with their bodies. To investigate the effects of space differences, the animals were divided into three groups and kept in 2.5 m², 5 m², and 10 m² of available space per animal. When comparing their weight and growth, a deficit was found in the animals that were provided with a housing area of 2.5 m². Furthermore, the animals exhibited differences in their integument and plumage score. The ostriches with the smallest housing area showed poorer scores in the plumage and integument than the animals with more space. At the conclusion of this study, the animals were slaughtered, and their carcass weights were compared. Similarly, lower carcass weights of the animals with a 2.5 m² barn area were observed. Prior studies have indicated that long-term stress leads to immune deficiencies associated with the inadequate development of the immune organs. However, a preliminary examination of the heart and spleen did not reveal any evidence for this. Further ethological studies are necessary to provide specific recommendations for minimum housing areas for ostriches.
... Ostrich meat is recognized for its favorable fatty acid profile, characterized by a balanced proportion of polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids (PUFA/SFA) and an optimal balance of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid (n-6/n-3). Furthermore, its low intramuscular fat and sodium content, coupled with elevated levels of iron and vitamin E, render it a significant component of the dietary intake (Poławska et al., 2011). However, the presence of prooxidants such as heme iron and PUFA make ostrich meat susceptible to oxidative deterioration. ...
Article
Full-text available
Ostrich meat has a favorable nutritional profile but is susceptible to oxidative deterioration due to its high prooxidants. This study aimed to assess the effects of edible coatings made from Malva neglecta mucilage (MLM) including Myrtus communis essential oil (MEO), in both conventional and nanocomposite (nanoclay-based) forms on the oxidative stability and sensory characteristics of ostrich meat during 21-day storage at 4 °C. Samples coated with nanocomposite MLM containing 8 % MEO (NMLM-MEO 8 %) showed significantly lower pH (6.19), peroxide value (1.67 meq/kg lipid), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances index (1.11 mg MDA/kg), and carbonyl content (1.74 nmol/mg protein), alongside higher phenolic content (3.51 mg GAE/g meat) and overall acceptability score (4.6) compared to other groups (P ≤ 0.05). These findings demonstrate the potential of NMLM-MEO 8 % coating containing natural antioxidants as effective active packaging material, providing oxidative protection and sensory improvement in ostrich meat, while offering a sustainable alternative for the meat packaging industry.
... У раціоні астматиків воно повинно бути в межах 5:1, а у хворих на ревматоїдний артрит та рак товстої кишки -2,5:1 7 . Всесвітня організація охорони здоров'я рекомендує співвідношення омега-6/омега-3 жирних кислот нижче 4, оскільки при такій пропорції спостерігається суттєве зниження смертності від серцево-судинних захворювань 8 . ...
... These values suggest that consuming a diet rich in UFAs can reduce LDL-C and decrease overall serum cholesterol levels. The Expert Committee of the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization recommended maintaining the n-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio below 4, as this proportion is associated with a significant reduction (70%) in cardiovascular disease-related deaths [61,62]. Desirable fatty acids (DFAs) include all the unsaturated FAs and oleic acid. ...
Article
Full-text available
Large-scale bovine colostrum production yields a significant byproduct called colostrum cream (CC). Colostrum cream is the byproduct of the industry where the colostrum is separated, and the colostrum milk is processed and converted into a colostrum formula and immunoglobulin colostrum powder. However, the disposal of CC poses sustainability challenges. CC composition differs significantly from milk fat and can be a valuable source of fatty acids (FAs) in the human diet. Ghee or butter oil manufactured from cream or butter is a product with almost 99.8% fat, with longer shelf life and a unique flavor. The study was planned to see the effect of FA profile and nutritional health indicators derived from FA profiles, such as the atherogenicity index (AI) and thrombogenicity index (TI) of CC, colostrum butter oil (CBO) samples, butter oil (BO), and sweet cream (SC), as they can significantly influence cardiovascular health. Three SC samples from a dairy plant and six CC samples were collected from a private company. BO and CBO samples were made in atmospheric conditions and analyzed for chemical composition and FA profiles in triplicates. SC and BO samples have higher levels of saturated and trans FAs. CC and CBO are richer in beneficial FAs. CBO offers a healthier profile with higher PUFA/SFAs and a lower AI and TI, which can be an essential source of FAs in the human diet and support sustainability.
... However, in the current study, the high levels of BVL feeding as a replacement of 75 and 100% AH in ostrich diets with long-term exposure (210 d) led to lower ADG which is probably attributed to the plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) in 3 Calculations are made with the following exchange: 1 USD = 274,000 IR Rials. 4 Total feed cost per kg BW. 5 Calculated as total feed cost per kg BW/total income per kg BW 19 . 6 Experimental diets consisting of a control with no BVL (CTRL) and four groups with BVL as a substitute for AH at varying levels including 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study determined production performance, nutrient intake, digestibility, and carcass traits from ostrich chicks fed with barberry (Berberis Vulgaris) leaves (BVL) as a replacement for alfalfa hay (AH). For 150 days, 30 male ostrich (Struthio camelus) (9.10 ± 0.89 kg live weight, mean ± SD) were randomly grouped into five dietary BVL inclusion levels to replace AH: a control diet based on 100% AH (CTRL), and four groups with BVL as a substitute for AH at varying levels including 25% (BVL25), 50% (BVL50), 75% (BVL75), and 100% (BVL100). The average daily feed intakes (ADFI) were recorded and birds were weighed monthly. The nutrient intake and digestibility were measured for the following final 5 days of the trial. The ADFI was higher (p = 0.025) for BVL100 and BVL75 than for CTRL. Ostriches fed on BVL50 had the highest average daily gain (ADG, p = 0.025) and the lowest feed conversation ratio (FCR, p = 0.0001). Return per kg BW gain was also enhanced (p = 0.018) with BVL50 feeding. Dietary BVL levels did not affect the digestibility of OM (p = 0.257), CP (p = 0.260), EE (p = 0.610), CF (p = 0.427), and Ash (p = 0.461). Also, there were no changes in AME (p = 0.180) or AMEn (p = 0.670). The hot carcass weight (HCW, p = 0.331) and dressing BW (p = 0.237) were not affected. Overall, the results suggest that BVL can replace AH in ostrich diets without deleterious impact on performance, however, its partial substitution (for 50% AH of diet) has been associated with improved ADG, FCR, and reduced feeding costs.
... Issues related to the levels of macro-and micronutrients in poultry meat have been presented in many studies but mainly in the context of the influence of diet on their levels in meat [10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, few studies have investigated the effect of stress factors on the levels of macro-and micronutrients in poultry meat [20][21][22]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary Simple Summary: Poultry can be exposed to a number of adverse stimuli during the pre-slaughter handling. Noise, movement, lack of access to water and feed, change in habitat, disruption of flock hierarchy or environmental conditions can lead to adverse changes in the bird’s body. A significant increase in these factors can cause disturbances in the body’s homeostasis. These changes may be reflected in meat quality. Therefore, there is a need to assess the effect of pre-slaughter turnover on meat quality. In this study, the effects of pre-slaughter treatments on changes in macro- and micronutrient content were analyzed. Abstract In this study, the effect of pre-slaughter handling on the content of macro- and micronutrients in blood serum and in the breast muscle of turkeys was assessed. Four different variants of pre-slaughter handling were used in the research: no transport (N-T), transport for a distance of 100 km (T-100), transport for a distance of 200 km (T-200), and transport for a distance of 300 km (T-300). In each of them, 30 female and 30 male turkeys were used. Blood was collected from the birds before slaughter, and samples of the pectoral muscle were collected after slaughter. In the obtained biological material, the content of Mg, P, Ca, Fe, Na and K was analyzed. On the basis of the obtained research results, it can be concluded that the pre-slaughter handling negatively affects the content of macro- and microelements both in the blood serum and in the pectoral muscles of experimental turkeys. Additionally, differences due to the sex of birds were observed.
... Specifically, the omega-6 fatty acid accounted for 24.5% of the total fatty acids, while the omega-3 fatty acid accounted for 8.5%. Coupled with the high levels of PUFA in ostrich meat, it becomes a particularly favorable choice for cardiovascular patients and the elderly to fulfill their protein requirements with greater confidence [3,5,6]. Additionally, ostrich meat is exceptionally tender and boasts remarkable digestibility, with nearly 90% of it being digestible, making it superior to other meats such as chicken and beef in terms of digestion efficiency [1][2][3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Hydrolyzed proteins have gained significant importance in the food industry due to their potential antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. They have been recognized for their ability to improve the shelf life and safety of food products. In this study, the researchers focused on incorporating hydrolyzed protein from sesame meal (SMPH) into a composite coating along with chitosan-cress seed gum (CH-CG). The aim was to investigate the effect of this composite coating, in both free and nanoparticle forms, on the shelf life of ostrich fillets during a 12-day refrigerated storage period. Initially, SMPH was produced using microbial alcalase protease enzymes, and its degree of hydrolysis and antioxidant properties were evaluated. Then, SMPH was encapsulated using liposomes. Six treatments were evaluated to examine the effect of CH-CG coating and SMPH, in both free and nanoparticle forms, on the extension of the shelf life of ostrich fillets: control, CH-CG, CH-CG + 0.5% SMPH, CH-CG + 1% SMPH, CH-CG + 0.5% nano SMPH (NSMPH), and CH-CG + 1% NSMPH. Chemical parameters (peroxide value, thiobarbituric acid, and nitrogenous volatile bases) and microbial parameters (total bacterial count and psychrotrophic bacteria count) were periodically analyzed. The results showed that SMPH with a hydrolysis time of 90 min and a molecular weight of 3 kD exhibited the highest protein content, degree of hydrolysis, and DPPH free radical scavenging activity (P < 0.05). The particle size of NSMPH was found to be 56.3 nm, the zeta potential was 38.1 mV, and the encapsulation efficiency was 75.95%. The chemical and microbial analyses indicated that the composite coating with SMPH led to a slower increase in oxidative and microbial indices compared to the control treatment, and NSMPH enhanced its antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. Among all the treatments, the CH-CG + 1% NSMPH treatment demonstrated the most favorable results among all the tested treatments. Therefore, this treatment has the potential to serve as a natural preservative option in the meat industry, offering improved preservation, reduced spoilage, and enhanced product quality and safety.
... It is characterized by its high polyunsaturated fatty acid content, low saturated fatty acid [4,5], and low sodium content (32-36 mg/100 g) compared to beef (63 mg/100 g) or chicken (77 mg/100 g). It also contains the highest iron content of any other meat source available to humans (from 23.2 to 40.2 mg/kg), while beef has only about 19.3 and chicken 4-7 mg/kg [6]. Ostrich meat can be an important source of iron for patients with anemia as well as for pregnant women, and its consumption can also be beneficial for people who need to follow a low-sodium diet, such as people with hypertension. ...
Article
Full-text available
Ostrich meat is an interesting alternative to poultry or beef due to its nutritional value. The addition of three plant species (hot peppers, acerola, Schisandra chinesis) was suggested as a method to improve the quality, safety, and consumer acceptance of sausages prepared from ostrich meat. A series of microbiological and chemical analyses (including, inter alia, content of biogenic amines, heavy metals, and bioactive compounds) of the products as well as their sensory evaluation was performed to verify this claim. The microflora of all sausages was dominated by lactic acid bacteria. The biggest threat to consumers’ health could be connected to the presence of biogenic amines formed through the enzymatic activity of lactic acid bacteria. The sausages with plant additives had better antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties and lower fat oxidation—these features were correlated with the presence of vitamin C. Sausages with plant additives had a higher acceptability in terms of taste and smell.
... Besides CLAs, other PUFAs with a fundamental role in human health are n-6 and n-3 PUFAs. Current recommendations suggest maintaining dietary n-6/n-3 ratios between 2.5 and 4:1 to reduce cardiovascular disease incidences, while the ratio normally ranges from 15:1 to 16.7:1 [70,71]. The average n-6/n3 ratio of milk fat is around 6:1 [55], and thus, lowering the n6/n3 ratio of milk (i.e., the LA/ALA ratio) has the potential to improve the health of consumers [72]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Milk has become a staple food product globally. Traditionally, milk quality assessment has been primarily focused on hygiene and composition to ensure its safety for consumption and processing. However, in recent years, the concept of milk quality has expanded to encompass a broader range of factors. Consumers now also consider animal welfare, environmental impact, and the presence of additional beneficial components in milk when assessing its quality. This shifting consumer demand has led to increased attention on the overall production and sourcing practices of milk. Reflecting on this trend, this review critically explores such novel quality parameters, offering insights into how such practices meet the modern consumer’s holistic expectations. The multifaceted aspects of milk quality are examined, revealing the intertwined relationship between milk safety, compositional integrity, and the additional health benefits provided by milk’s bioactive properties. By embracing sustainable farming practices, dairy farmers and processors are encouraged not only to fulfill but to anticipate consumer standards for premium milk quality. This comprehensive approach to milk quality underscores the necessity of adapting dairy production to address the evolving nutritional landscape and consumption patterns.
Article
Full-text available
The slaughtering and processing of ostriches for commercial meat production is well developed in South Africa and Israel. Ostrich carcasses produce approximately 60% separable lean meat, mainly situated in the hindquarters. The most striking characteristic of ostrich meat is a high final pH which partly explains why ostrich meat is darker than beef and is the biggest drawback to use in processed meat products. Ostrich meat is more tender than beef but meat quality differs considerably between muscles. The composition of ostrich meat is generally similar to beef and chicken. The low intramuscular fat (0.5%) and sodium (43 mg/100 g) contents could be valuable tools in introducing ostrich meat to the developed western meat market.
Article
Full-text available
Due to a belief in the special healthy characteristics of their meat, ratites (ostriches, emus, rheas) are receiving more and more attention as meat producers for developed markets. All three kinds of ratites can be slaughtered by the same technique. At the scientific level, avian nomenclature is applied to the muscles used in meat production, while a variety of trade names is being used commercially. Dressing percentage, meat production on a live and carcass weight basis, as well as proportional weight of individual muscles are of the same order for all three species. Ratite meat is characterized by a high final pH value which may result in a limited shelf life. Nutritional information, especially about emu and rhea meat, is rarely found.
Article
Full-text available
This review discusses avian influenza (AI) in ostriches and its influence on the biology and trade of ostrich products. All avian influenza viruses (AIV) belong to the Influenza virus A genus of the Orthomyxoviridae family and are negative-strand, segmented RNA viruses. AIV isolated from ostriches include the H5N2, H5N9, H6N8, H7N1, H9N2 and H10N1 subtypes. The clinical signs of AIV infection in ostriches are described. AI outbreaks in ostrich flocks in the years 2004-2006 caused market disturbances worldwide and the economical losses in the ostrich production sector, particularly in South Africa which exports approximately 90% of its ostrich meat and leather. Since the production cycle in the ostrich business is around one year, any negative events and actions undertaken have long-term consequences. Therefore prevention of infection is of the utmost importance.
Article
Although the ostrich (Struthio camelus) has been farmed for many years for skins, eggs, meat and feathers, very little is known about the genetic structure of this species. The suitability of 29 chicken microsatellite markers was evaluated as potential genetic linkage markers in the ostrich. No sequence homology was stated (0.00% similarity) between any of the 29 chicken microsatellites and the genome of the ostrich. This leads to the conclusion that the former are not suitable for genome mapping of the latter. In light of this, more work should especially be done to widen our knowledge of ostrich specific markers.
Article
The influence of three different internal end temperatures on the cooking loss, objective tenderness and proximate composition of 2 different ostrich muscles (Iliotibialis lateralis and Iliofemoralis) were investigated. While cooking loss and moisture content progressively inceased (P<0.05), protein content decreased (P<0.05) and tenderness as well as intramuscular fat remained relatively constant with increasing internal temperatures in both muscles.
Article
The influence of cooking on the ether-extractable fat content, caloric value, lipid content, cholesterol content, and fatty acid composition of theiliofibularismuscle from the ostrich carcass has been studied. A comparison was also made between values obtained for ostrich and those of beef and chicken. The ether-extractable fat content, caloric value, lipid content, and cholesterol content of ostrich meat were increased (P< 0.05) by cooking due to a decrease (P< 0.05) in moisture content. Cooking did not influence (P> 0.05) thew3/w6 fatty acid ratio (approximately 0.35) of ostrich meat. Although ostrich meat is relatively low in ether-extractable fat content (0.91 g/100 g), cholesterol content (57 mg/100 g) does not differ from that of beef or chicken.
Article
Ostrich meat may be consumed as a healthy alternative to beef. The establishment of ostrich farming systems is not sufficient to satisfy consumer demand without the use of a successful production and marketing strategy. Given the current export driven nature of the industry in Southern Africa and the need for the development of a domestic market, a good understanding of the position of ostrich meat in the marketing mix and the key elements in meat processing is necessary.