ArticlePDF Available

A Meta-Analytical Investigation of the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance

Authors:

Abstract

The growing number of academic studies on the impact of Corporate Social Performance (CSP) on Corporate Financial Performance (CFP) and the mixed findings they report complicate efforts among managers and academics to identify the outcomes of corporate social responsibility. These mixed findings and the growing interest of managers on having satisfied corporate social policy point to the value of empirically synthesizing the evidence on the relationship between CSP and CFP. Although many reviews of these studies have been published (Ullman, 1985 ; Griffin & Mahon, 1997 ; Roman, Haybor & Agle, 1999 ; Margolis & Walsh, 2003), there have been little attempts to use formal statistical tools to synthesize the results (Orlitky & Benjamin, 2001 ; Orlitky, Schmidt & Rynes, 2003). Orlitsky et al. (2003) obviously made valuable contributions, presenting the first meta-analysis of the empirical evidence on the impact of CSP on firm financial performance. However, since this last meta-analytic review, dozens of studies examining the link between CSP and CFP have been published in academic journals and recent studies have also focused on the effect of CSP on CFP in a broader international context. To this end, we conduct a new meta-analysis of the reported findings on the CSP/CFP relationship. We document that CSP is strongly related to CFP on average. We also find that measurement and method that characterize the research often moderate relationship strength between CSP and CFP. Finally, we discuss the implications surrounding these effects and offer several directions for future research.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
A META-ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL AND FINANCIAL PERFOR...
Allouche, José;Laroche, Patrice
Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines; Jul-Sep 2005; 57; ABI/INFORM Complete
pg. 18
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
... The research results from several of these studies (Allouche & Laroche, 2005;Barnea & Rubin, 2010;Borghesi et al., 2014;Brown et al., 2006;Kao et al., 2018;Schuler & Cording, 2006) konsisten dengan teori keagenan. The empirical findings include that corporate social responsibility is a manifestation of agency problems (Benabou & Tirole, 2010;Masulis & Reza, 2015), managers involved in corporate philanthropic activities gain personal benefits at the expense of shareholders (Brown et al., 2006;Krüger, 2015), agency costs rise when managers invest in social activities to enhance their personal reputation (Barnea & Rubin, 2010), managers may lose focus on core managerial responsibilities (Jensen, 2010), and decreased ESG activity is associated with greater firm value. ...
... Thus, ESG activities are activities that consume company resources and will harm company performance. Second, because it is related to cost allocation, the company's involvement in ESG activities will displace other projects that are more profitable for the company (Schuler & Cording, 2006), because ESG practices require company resources so that socially active companies are in a less advantageous position compared to other companies that are not active (Allouche & Laroche, 2005). Third, corporate involvement in ESG activities can encourage managers to engage in window dressing to cover up poor corporate performance by engaging in ESG activities. ...
Article
Full-text available
The increasing awareness of companies in ESG practices and the growth of Islamic financial institutions, are very interesting strategic issues to explore in more depth. This study attempts to conduct a more in-depth exploration study in examining the relationship between ESG practices that are implemented and integrated into the company's business processes with company performance. In-depth exploration is based on two grand theories that are substantially different, namely agency theory and stakeholder theory. The approach chosen in this study is a qualitative approach through literature review, with data in the form of 45 research articles that have been published in reputable international journals, and accredited national journals that are relevant to the exploration study. The results of the study show that agency theory and stakeholder theory are the two most widely used theories in research that test or examine the relationship between ESG practices and company performance. Each theory proponent has different arguments in explaining the relationship between ESG practices and performance. Stakeholder theory is considered more appropriate in describing the relationship between ESG practices and the performance of Islamic companies due to the high ethical and moral standards applied by Islamic companies. In the context of sharia, there are several criticisms of the arguments in agency theory, including the prohibition for managers to behave opportunistically which tends to prioritize their own interests and harm the principal, and there 21 is also a prohibition on carrying out earnings management that provides information that can mislead users of information. The novelty in this study is related to the exploratory study that is currently being developed as the first study in a qualitative approach that examines the relationship between ESG practices and the performance of sharia companies.
... The results of this study indicate that there is opportunistic behavior from managers in order to fulfill their personal interests (Brown et al., 2006) through ESG practices, and managers are personally motivated to build their image without regard to the rights of shareholders or principals (Barnea & Rubin, 2010). The results of the study are also in line with the results of other studies which show that projects that are more profitable for the company cannot be implemented or are displaced by the company's involvement in ESG activities (Schuler & Cording, 2006), so that the company's position becomes less profitable when compared to the position of other companies that are not actively seen in activities related to the environment, social, and governance (Allouche & Laroche, 2005). ...
... The results of this study have found that ESG practices carried out by companies listed on JII70 and SRI KEHATI have a negative effect on profitability performance. The results of the study are in line with previous empirical studies (Allouche & Laroche, 2005;Barnea & Rubin, 2010;Borghesi et al., 2014;Brown et al., 2006;Kao et al., 2018;Schuler & Cording, 2006). The results of this study empirically prove that the negative impacts on company performance, including ESG practices carried out by companies are actually a manifestation of agency problems (Benabou & Tirole, 2010;Masulis & Reza, 2015), more accommodating to managers' interests in obtaining personal gain compared to shareholder interests (Brown et al., 2006;Krüger, 2015), expenses related to ESG practices only improve the image and reputation of managers personally (Barnea & Rubin, 2010), focusing more on the ESG practices they carry out makes managers ignore core tasks related to their managerial duties (Jensen, 2010)however, being the managers rather of other people's money than of their own, it cannot well be expected that they should watch Kautsar Riza Salman, Herwin Ardianto, Entis Sutisna, Jana Siti Nor Khasanah over it with the same anxious vigilance with which the partners in a private copartnery frequently watch over their own. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to obtain empirical evidence on the effects of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) on the profitability performance of Islamic companies, incorporating the moderating effect of financial slack in this relationship. The sample includes Islamic companies listed on the Jakarta Islamic Index 70 (JII 70) and the SRI KEHATI index over the 2021-2023 period, resulting in 129 firm-year observations. Panel data analysis using Eviews 13 software identified the Random Effect Model as the best approach. Findings indicate that ESG practices significantly affect profitability, supporting agency theory by suggesting that management may engage in ESG activities that incur costs without clear financial benefits for shareholders. Financial slack does not moderate the ESG-profitability relationship. Instead, financial slack, proxied by the cash ratio, directly impacts profitability. These findings suggest that while ESG practices may have profitability trade-offs, financial flexibility could enhance profit potential in Islamic companies. For policymakers, these results underscore the need to tailor ESG frameworks to the unique financial dynamics of Islamic companies, potentially aiding these firms in achieving both sustainable and profitable growth.
... The availability of financial resources is one of the factors that influences a company's capacity to invest in ESG practices (Aguilera-Caracuel et al., 2015;Allouche & Laroche, 2005;Carnahan et al., 2010;Waddock & Graves, 1997). When organizations have resources that can be allocated to other uses, their managers tend to take more innovative actions (Voss et al., 2008), thereby meeting the demands of corporate stakeholders. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explores the impact of ESG (environmental, social, governance) on company financial performance, particularly in manufacturing companies. In addition, this research also seeks to analyze whether high financial slack can strengthen the relationship between ESG, both collectively and separately, and the company's Return on Assets (ROA). The population focused on this study consists of 635 manufacturing companies operating in Indonesia, with a sample of 446 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The data used comes from annual and sustainability reports from 2018 to 2022. To analyze the data, this study employs linear regression analysis, including calculating coefficients, p-values, and R-squared. The study results show that the environmental, social, and governance variables do not have a significant relationship with the company's ROA, indicating that although ESG is considered important, its implementation in practice may not yet provide the expected impact on financial performance. Additionally, high financial slack was found not to strengthen the relationship between ESG and ROA, suggesting that more significant financial resources do not always guarantee improved sustainable performance. The implications of this study highlight the importance of companies effectively managing ESG aspects and financial resources to achieve sustainability. These findings also provide theoretical insights into the role of financial slack in the relationship between ESG and financial performance, emphasizing that companies need to be more proactive in integrating sustainability practices into their business strategies.
... According to the positive synergy hypothesis, there is a sequential relationship between a firm's social responsibility and its profitability (Friedman, 1970). The hypothesis assumes that companies with high corporate social performance will have the opportunity to reinvest in social responsibility actions, leading to performance improvement (Allouche & Laroche, 2005). Therefore, creating a productive cycle will result in a concurrent positive relationship between CSR and financial performance (Waddock & Graves, 1997). ...
Article
Full-text available
PURPOSE: Stakeholders such as consumers, nongovernmental organizations, and public institutions have increasingly pressured companies to adopt corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies. This trend has led to the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting into business strategies to achieve long-term competitive advantages and enhance financial performance. ESG reporting has become a critical tool for measuring corporate CSR efforts, contributing to the institutionalization of nonfinancial reporting standards. This study aims to determine how the adoption of ESG sub-dimensions affects the financial performance of companies in Turkey. METHODOLOGY: The study employed panel regression analysis on data from 21 companies listed in the Borsa Istanbul-100 index over the period 2011–2020 to investigate the relationship between ESG sub-dimensions and firm performance. FINDINGS: The findings indicate that adopting the environmental and governance sub-dimensions positively affects ROE and Tobin’s Q. However, the adoption of the governance sub-dimension negatively impacts Tobin’s Q while positively influencing ROE. No statistically significant results were found regarding the impact of ESG sub-dimensions on firms’ ROA ratios. IMPLICATIONS: The results of the research, based on the example of Turkey, are important to determine how companies’ social responsibility strategies in developing countries provide them with outputs in terms of environment, social and governance and whether social responsibility-based activities are truly sustainable strategy for companies in developing countries.The findings highlight the importance of considering the macroeconomic structure, legal system, and financial development of countries when evaluating CSR activities. The regulatory environment plays a significant role, as weaker legal protections can negatively affect the relationship between governance practices and firm performance. For practitioners, the insights suggest prioritizing environmental investments and carefully strategizing governance practices to align with investor expectations and regulatory frameworks. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: By focusing on the BIST 100 companies, this study contributes to the limited literature on the role of ESG sub-dimensions in shaping financial performance in developing markets. This research provides valuable insights into how environmental, social, and governance practices specifically impact the financial outcomes of firms in Turkey, offering a nuanced understanding that can inform both academic discussions and practical strategies in similar contexts.
... Firstly, the measurement of quality in financial and non-financial reporting is a complex issue as there are many angles to judge the quality according to different dimensions adopted [116]. At a more abstract level, disclosure quality can be defined as the degree of self-interested bias in the disclosure [117]. ...
Article
Since 2016, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (“HKEx”) has required listed companies to issue Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) reports annually. The purpose of ESG reports is to inform stakeholders and the general public of listed companies’ performance in ESG aspects. For big corporations, issuing ESG reports and reporting their key performance indicators (“KPIs”) are not a problem because they have been doing so voluntarily for years. Rather, it is a challenge for small and medium-sized listed companies (“SMEs”) to report properly because they may be lacking in knowledge, skills and motivation, etc. In particular, the quality of quantitative measurements on ESG data disclosure remains variable. This research effort adopted a scoring methodology to assess the relevance and completeness of the environmental KPIs, which are semi-mandatory to disclose. A total of 138 SMEs were proportionately selected by a stratified sampling method based on the 11 categories of industries set by the Hang Seng Industry Classification System. The disclosure quality of these selected sample companies’ environmental KPIs was assessed by scoring. We found that the average disclosure quality score was a low 1.98. “Energy Use Efficiency” was the highest performing KPI, while “The Environment and Natural Resources” was the lowest-performing KPI. Across the different industries, Industrial Goods achieved the highest disclosure quality score, while the Telecommunication industry hadtheworstscore. This research also explored some ofthecommon problems faced whilst reporting environmental KPIs.
... In the realm of sustainability, numerous scholars have posited that having resource slack facilitates a firm's engagement in sustainable activities (Daniel et al., 2004;Waddock & Graves, 1997). Financial slack empowers top managers to address long-term challenges, thus enabling substantive efforts to enhance social and environmental performance (Allouche & Laroche, 2005;Perez-Batres et al., 2012;Surroca et al., 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
The term sustainability and environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria has gained greater importance globally in recent decades. As social and environmental issues increase, firms are advocating the need to be more sustainable. However, in this scenario, corporate controversies still persist, and an analysis of their causes is required. This study focuses on establishing the relationship between financial constraints (FC) and ESG controversies and on determining whether the country context might modify the controversial behaviours of financially constrained firms. Through a Tobit analysis for panel data-and using a sample of firms with headquarters in 47 countries-our results show a positive and significant influence of FC on ESG controversies. In addition, our evidence confirms that country context impacts relationships within the firm, and that opting for controversial activities is increasingly less viable for firms located in countries where there is institutionalized sustainability.
... For instance, Kooskora et al. (2019) found that CSR has a significant negative effect on financial performance only when using accounting-based measures, but CSR was not able to explain firm performance. Similarly, certain other studies demonstrate that accounting-based measures (e.g., ROI) have a higher effect size than market-based measures (e.g., Tobin's Q) (e.g., see Allouche & Laroche, 2005). Thus, we hypothesized that: ...
Article
Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) has received considerable attention in family firms, empirical findings on the CSR/family firm performance nexus are mixed and inconsistent. This meta‐analytic review aims to clarify the mixed results by establishing the degree to which CSR influences family firm performance and to test the moderating effects of contextual and methodological factors. Integrating a sample of 85 studies published up to May 2023 with 152,265 observations and employing a psychometric meta‐analysis through bivariate and meta‐regression analyses, we find that the average effect of CSR on family firm performance is positive, though small (≤0.20). Our study further reveals that CSR is positively and significantly related to financial performance, innovation, reputation, and sustainability, but the impact on firm sustainability is the largest. Our moderation analysis shows that the relationship between CSR and family firm performance is moderated by contextual factors (i.e., family ownership concentration, firm size, stock exchange listing, culture, and rule of law) and methodological factors (i.e., publication type, data type, performance proxy, and study type). Theoretically, our study appears to be the foremost meta‐analytic review on the CSR/family firm performance relationship, as previous meta‐analyses have focused on the drivers of CSR in family firms. Practically, we demonstrate that family firms can leverage CSR as both a “failure‐prevention” strategy (i.e., survival strategy) and a “success‐inducing” strategy (competitive advantage).
Article
Purpose: This paper re-examines the overall and pillar-level impact of the envi-ronmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on the financial perfor-mance of companies listed in the Italian Stock Exchange market. By using the seminal paper by Velte (2017) – which focused on the German context – as the base comparison, we also test the moderating role of a firm's characteristics on that association. Design/methodology/approach: We analyze data on companies listed in the Ital-ian Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2022, sourced from the Refinitiv Eikon plat-form, for a total of 650 firm-year observations. Correlation and regression anal-yses are conducted to evaluate the link between ESG and a series of financial per-formance indicators including the return on assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q ratios. Findings: While neutral results are found for ROA, this study reveals that ESG per-formance has a positive impact on Tobin's Q, in contrast to what was found by Velte (2017). However, we confirm that the governance pillar exerts the most sig-nificant effect on Tobin's Q. Furthermore, the analysis of the firms' characteristics as moderating factors reveals that the risk and financial leverage of a company negatively influence the relationship between ESG performance and financial per-formance. Originality/value: This study contributes to the empirical literature on the associ-ation between ESG performance and financial performance by re-examining the study by Velte (2017) for a different period and different context. Moreover, we test for the moderating effect of the firms' characteristics on the relationship be-tween ESG and financial performance.
Article
Full-text available
In an economic environment marked by innovation and competition, the skills, motivation and adaptability of human resources have become essential issues for companies seeking performance. In this context, the role of human resources management is considered fundamental for improving performance. While several studies examining the link between HRM and performance have been conducted by researchers, the causal link between these two concepts remains ambiguous. This link between human resources management and social performance is the core of our article. In this regard, we will present the result of a literature review of existing theories and works. The results of our research show the existence of several approaches and theoretical models demonstrating a positive link between HRM and performance, we will present the most mentioned in the literature; namely the universalist approach, the contingent approach, and the configurational approach.
Article
Full-text available
What is the relationship between kindness and happiness at work? Previous research has shown that kindness is a cause and a correlate of happiness in general, and that kinder companies have happier employees. Here we build on this research by using a new measure—the The Kindness Questionnaire (KQ)—to look at the relationship between kindness to and from specific individuals at work, and workplace happiness. In Study 1 (n = 1151) we find that kindness to and from bosses, colleagues and subordinates, and a more general measure of kindness at work, predicts happiness at work. In Study 2 (n = 781) we find that kindness to bosses, colleagues and subordinates, and kindness from bosses, colleagues but not subordinates, as well as more general measures of kindness at work, predict happiness at work. However, in both studies, the simpler general measures of kindness at work are better predictors of happiness at work than the more complicated specific measures. We also find that fair pay, meaningful work, and a competent boss predict happiness at work. The implications, limitations and future directions of this research are discussed.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.