Content uploaded by Sheng-Hua Wu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sheng-Hua Wu on Mar 11, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Species clarification of the prize medicinal Ganoderma
mushroom “Lingzhi”
Yun Cao &Sheng-Hua Wu &Yu-Cheng Dai
Received: 11 May 2012 / Accepted: 22 May 2012 /Published online: 10 June 2012
#Mushroom Research Foundation 2012
Abstract “Lingzhi”is a mushroom that has been renowned
in China for more than 2,000 years because of its claimed
medicinal properties plus its symbolic fortune. “Lingzhi”
has high economic value mostly as a dietary supplement in
the modern market especially in East Asia, and its medicinal
functions have become a hot study topic. For over a century,
the highly prized medicinal fungus, known as “Lingzhi”in
East Asia, has been assigned to Ganoderma lucidum,a
species originally described from Europe. Molecular studies
in recent years have revealed that the commercially culti-
vated ‘G. lucidum’(“Lingzhi”) in East Asia is a different
species from the true G. lucidum. The present study aims to
clarify the species identity of “Lingzhi”based on morpho-
logical studies and analysis of rDNA nuc-ITS sequences,
and additional gene fragments of mt-SSU, RPB1, RPB2,
and TEF1-αof “Lingzhi”were provided. All Ganoderma
species that mostly resemble “Lingzhi”in phylogeny and /or
morphology were included for analysis. We propose a new
species G. lingzhi for “Lingzhi”, which has an East Asia
distribution. The most striking characteristics which differ-
entiate G. lingzhi from G. lucidum are the presence of
melanoid bands in the context, a yellow pore surface and
thick dissepiments (80–120 μm) at maturity. G. curtisii is
most closely related to G. lingzhi in phylogeny and is from
North America. Ganoderma flexipes,G. multipileum, G.
sichuanense,G. tropicum and ‘G. tsugae’,are also closely
related with G. lingzhi and are reported from China. These
species are compared and discussed. ‘Ganoderma tsuage’
reported from China is determined as conspecific with G.
lucidum, hence the distribution of G. lucidum extends from
Europe to northeastern China.
Keywords Ganodermataceae .Ganoderma lingzhi .
G. lucidum .Medicinal fungus .Phylogeny .Taxonomy
Introduction
The Chinese word “Lingzhi”translates as ‘the polypore
genus Ganoderma P. Ka r s t . ’in a broad sense, and in a
narrow sense it represents the highly prized medicinal
Ganoderma species distributed in East Asia. In this paper,
we treat “Lingzhi”in its narrow sense: the widely medici-
nally applied species. “Lingzhi”, also known as “Chi-zhi”or
“Rui-zhi”in China, is one of the world’s most important
medicinal fungi. In the Orient, it is viewed as ‘herb of
spiritual potency’or ‘mushroom of immortality’, and sym-
bolizes sanctity, success, goodness and longevity (Gao and
Zhou 2003; Wasser 2005; Lin 2009; De Silva et al. 2012).
The earliest report about Lingzhi’s medicinal value appeared
in the oldest Chinese medicinal monograph Shennong’s
Y. Cao :Y.-C. Dai
State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology,
Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shenyang 110164, China
Y. Cao
Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100049, China
S.-H. Wu
Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural Science,
Taichung 404, Taiwan
S.-H. Wu (*)
Department of Plant Pathology, National Chunghsing University,
Taichung 402, Taiwan
e-mail: shwu@mail.nmns.edu.tw
Y.-C. Dai (*)
Institute of Microbiology, Beijing Forestry University,
Beijing 100083, China
e-mail: yuchengd@yahoo.com
Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62
DOI 10.1007/s13225-012-0178-5
Compendium of Material Medica about 100 B.C. The
knowledge of “Lingzhi”was also noted and renewed in
the subsequent medicinal literatures including the famous
Chinese Compendium of Materia Medica complied by Shi-
Zhen Li in 1590 during the Ming Dynasty (Yu and Shen
2003).
Modern medicinal studies indicate that “Lingzhi”is ef-
fective in preventing or relieving various human diseases
(Lin 2007; Dai et al 2009). Its medicinal properties include
anti-aging, lowering blood pressure, improving immunity,
and preventing and treating various cancers, chronic bron-
chitis, diabetes mellitus, gastric ulcers, hepatitis, hyperlipid-
emia, hypertension, neurasthenia and thrombosis (Lin 2007;
Dai et al. 2009; Aly et al. 2011; De Silva et al. 2012). The
fungus is also used in various cosmetics (Hyde et al. 2010).
The medicinal effects of “Lingzhi”come from its metabo-
lites including polysaccharides, triterpenes, lucidenic acids,
LZ-8 protein, adenosine, ergosterol, glucosamine, cerebro-
sides et al. (Jong and Birmingham 1992; Gao and Zhou
2003; Lin 2009). Currently, “Lingzhi”is among the most
sort after medicinal mushrooms in the world market. Vari-
ous “Lingzhi”products made from the cultivated fruiting
bodies have been commercialized as dietary supplements
worldwide and especially in Asian countries; its estimated
annual global turnover is approximately US$2.16 billion
(Lai et al. 2004; Wachtel-Galor et al. 2004).
Ganoderma lucidum (Curtis) P. Karst., the generic type,
was originally reported from Peckham, London, UK
(Moncalvo and Ryvarden 1997). Unfortunately, the holo-
type of G. lucidum was lost and attempts to seek a neotype
from the type locality also failed (Steyaert 1972; Moncalvo
and Ryvarden 1997). At present, this taxon has been
reported to have a worldwide distribution based on gross
similarity of morphological features, e.g., Europe (Steyaert
1972; Ryvarden and Gilbertson 1993), Asia (Hongo and
Izawa 1994; Núñez and Ryvarden 2000; Zhao and Zhang
2000), America (Bazzalo and Wright 1982; Gilbertson and
Ryvarden 1986), Oceania (Quanten 1997), and Africa
(Ryvarden and Johansen 1980).
Patouillard (1907) first reported G.lucidum from China,
based on collections from Guizhou Province. Later, the
Chinese mycologist SC Teng (Teng 1934) reported more
collections of G. lucidum from different regions of China. In
recent decades, G.lucidum has been reported from China by
other Chinese mycologists, e.g. Tai (1979), Zhao and Zhang
(2000), Wu and Dai (2005) and Dai (2012).
A cluster of “Lingzhi”specimens were collected from
Laoshan, in Shandong Province, China in 1969 and deter-
mined as ‘G. lucidum’by the mycologists of Institute of
Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Beijing).
With these specimens as mother strains, the first successful
cultivation of fruiting bodies of “Lingzhi”was performed in
the same year (Yu and Shen 2003). Since then, the
cultivation of “Lingzhi”has been popularized in China
and its adjacent countries, and G. lucidum has always been
adopted as the scientific binomial for the commercially
cultivated “Lingzhi”.
Liu (1974) compiled a monograph of Chinese medicinal
fungi, and he assigned G.lucidum to “Lingzhi”in his book.
Since then, G. lucidum was accepted as the scientific bino-
mial of “Lingzhi”in many reports on the Chinese edible and
medicinal mushrooms (Ying et al. 1987; Mao 1998; Dai et
al. 2009). Presently, G.lucidum has been widely used for
naming the commercialized “Lingzhi”products in the world
market of mushroom industry (Lai et al. 2004). Meanwhile,
the oriental “Lingzhi”materials used for biochemical, me-
dicinal and pharmaceutical studies were also labelled G.
lucidum (Kino et al. 1989;Minetal.2000; Bao et al.
2002; Hu et al. 2002; Sliva et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2002).
Studies of Moncalvo et al. (1994,1995) indicated that the
collections of ‘G. lucidum’reported from different regions
of the world (Europe, America, South and East Asia) do not
represent a single species, based on analysis of sequence
data from the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear rDNA
(nuc-ITS) and the divergent domain D2 of the large ribo-
somal subunit gene of nuclear rDNA (D2 of nuc-LSU).
Smith and Sivasithamparam (2000) further detected that
the materials of ‘G. lucidum’from Australia cluster with
‘G. lucidum’from tropical Asia and they differ from Euro-
pean G. lucidum through nuc-ITS analysis. Hong and Jung
(2004) reached a similar conclusion with Moncalvo et al.
(1994,1995) in their study of Ganoderma phylogeny based
on the nearly complete mitochondrial small-subunit ribo-
somal DNA sequences (mt-SSU).
Smith and Sivasithamparam (2003) proposed a new spe-
cies, G. steyaertanum B.J. Smith & K. Sivasithamparam, to
replace the mistakenly named G. lucidum in Australia and
Indonesia. Wang et al. (2009b) showed that the ‘G. lucidum’
distributed in tropical Asia is G. multipileum Ding Hou,
which is neither conspecific with the true G. lucidum dis-
tributed in Europe, nor conspecific with the real “Lingzhi”
distributed in East Asia.
Their phylogenetic analyses (Moncalvo et al. 1994,1995;
Smith and Sivasithamparam 2000; Hong and Jung 2004;
Wang et al. 2009b) also clearly indicated that the ‘G. luci-
dum’from East Asia represents a different species from the
true G. lucidum. From the morphological perspective,
Pegler and Yao (1996) noticed that “Lingzhi”bears a more
slender basidiocarp as compared to G. lucidum from
Europe. In recent years, Szedlay (2002), Wasser et al.
(2006) and Wasser (2011) also considered that G. lucidum
was mistakenly applied to this famous medicinal fungus
“Lingzhi”. Obviously, the clear recognition of the scientific
binomial to represent the “Lingzhi”species remains un-
known before our study. To determine the correct identity
of the “Lingzhi”species, we performed a detailed
50 Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62
morphological and phylogenetic study of nine Ganoderma
species that mostly resemble “Lingzhi”.
Materials and methods
To search the most similar species with “Lingzhi”, we have
referred to numerous literatures published during 1902–
2011 with special emphasis on those with recent descrip-
tions from the type or authentic specimens (Steyaert 1972,
1980; Ryvarden and Johansen 1980; Ryvarden 1981,1983,
1985,2004; Gilbertson and Ryvarden 1986; Ryvarden and
Gilbertson 1993; Hattori and Ryvarden 1994; Moncalvo and
Ryvarden 1997; Gottlieb and Wright 1999; Núñez and
Ryvarden 2000; Smith and Sivasithamparam 2003; Wang
and Wu 2008; Welti and Courtecuisse 2010). In particular,
we also studied the type specimens of Ganoderma species
described from China that share similar morphological fea-
tures with “Lingzhi”. We also consulted the studies of
Moncalvo et al. (1994) and Wang et al. (2009b) to select
the species for the phylogenetic analysis. Molecular data can
be used to infer relationships amongst groups of morpho-
logically similar basidiomycetes (Ge et al. 2010; Zhao et al.
2010; Yang 2011; He and Dai 2012; Zhao et al. 2012).
Samples for the analysis included wild collections, com-
mercially cultivated fruiting bodies or strains, and sequences
derived from GenBank (Table 1). The commercially culti-
vated materials ‘G.lucidum’were obtained from the major
cultivation bases in ten provinces of China. Most wild speci-
mens were collected by the authors from 15 provinces of
China over the last decade. All specimens used in this study
are mainly deposited at the herbaria of Institute of Applied
Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IFP), Shenyang
and Beijing Forestry University (BJFC), Beijing. Some
were from the Mycological Herbarium, Institute of Micro-
biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HMAS), Beijing,
Herbarium of the National Museum of Natural Science
(TNM), Taichung, and Botanical Museum, University of
Helsinki (H), Helsinki.
The microscopic procedure used in this study follows Dai
(2010) with some minor amendments. Sections were exam-
ined at magnification up to×1000 under a Nikon Eclipse E
80i microscope and phase contrast illumination. Drawings
were made with the aid of a drawing tube. As the turgid
vesicular appendix at distal end of basidiospores in Gano-
derma are collapsed at maturity, the size of spores was
measured with the turgid vesicular appendix excluded and
included respectively (Niemelä and Miettinen 2008). In
presenting the variation in the size of spores, 5 % of the
measurements were excluded from each end of the range,
and are given in parentheses. The following abbreviations
used in the text include: IKI 0Melzer’s reagent, IKI–0neg-
ative in Melzer’s reagent, KOH05 % potassium hydroxide,
CB0Cotton Blue, CB+0cyanophilous, L 0mean spore
length (arithmetic average of all spores), W 0mean spore
width (arithmetic average of all spores), Q 0variation in the
L/W ratios between the specimens studied, n 0number of
spores measured from given number of specimens. Special
colour terms are from Anonymous (1969)andPetersen
(1996).
The nuc-ITS sequences were amplified for “Lingzhi”and
its related species for phylogenetic analysis. The mt-SSU
sequences were also obtained for the Chinese ‘G. tsuage’to
study its relationship with the true G. lucidum. In addition,
the gene fragments of mt-SSU, RPB1, RPB2, and TEF1-α
were amplified for “Lingzhi”. Total genomic DNA was
extracted from dried specimens or living cultures using the
Phire® Plant Direct PCR Kit (Finnzymes Oy, Finland)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions with slight
modifications. The primer pairs, ITS5/ITS4 (White et al.
1990) or ITS1F/ITS4B (Gardes and Bruns 1993) were used
to amplify the nuc-ITS region. For some specimens depos-
ited in herbarium for more than 10 years, three new Gano-
derma-specific primers, G-ITS-F1 (ACC CTG TCG CTG
AGA ACT TGA), G-ITS-R1 (AGC ACT GGT AGT CCG
TGT CA) and G-ITS-R2 (TTG AGA GCG CAT CAC AAA
GC), were designed to select for Ganoderma specimens
rather than possible internal inhabitats. Combined with the
published primers for nuc-ITS amplification, the primer
pairs G-ITS-F1/G-ITS-R2 and G-ITS-F1/ITS4B were se-
lected for successful amplification. The primers for ampli-
fying the mt-SSU gene fragment were BMS05/BMS173
(Hong and Jung 2004). The RPB1 gene fragment was am-
plified using the primer pairs RPB1-2.2f/RPB1-Cr
(Matheny et al. 2002; Binder et al. 2010). The RPB2 gene
fragment was amplified with the primer pair fRPB2-5F/
bRPB2-7R2 (Liu et al. 1999; Matheny et al. 2007). The
TEF1-αgene fragment was amplified using the primer pair
EF1-983F/EF1-2218R (Rehner and Buckley 2005). The
obtained genomic DNA was diluted 1–10 times if necessary.
PCR reactions were performed in 50 μL reaction mixtures
containing 25 μL of 2×Phire® Plant PCR buffer, 1μL
Phire® Hot Start II DNA Polymerase, 5 μL of each PCR
primer (10 μM), 2–5μl dilution protocol and total volume
was adjusted to 50 μL with sterile deionized water. The
following PCR procedure for Phire® Plant Direct PCR Kit
was: initial denaturation for 5 min at 98 °C, followed by 39
cycles at 98 °C for 5 s, annealing temperature for 5 s and
72 °C for 20 s, and a final extension of 72 °C for 2 min. PCR
amplification was performed at the following annealing
temperatures: 59 °C (ITS5/ITS4), 60 °C (ITS1F/ITS4B),
69.5 °C (G-ITS-F1/ITS4B), 66.5 °C (G-ITS-F1/ G-ITS-
R2), 55 °C(BMS05/BMS173), 50 °C (RPB1-2.2f/RPB1-
Cr), 55 °C (fRPB2-5F/bRPB2-7R2) and 59 °C (EF1-
983 F/EF1-2218R). The successful PCR products were sent
to Beijing Genomics Institute, China for purification and
Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62 51
Table 1 Species used in nuc-ITS rDNA analysis, along with their specimen/strain numbers, locality and GenBank accession numbers
Accepted names Names from
specimens/GenBank
Specimen/
strain
numbers
Locality GenBank No. Reference
Amauroderma rudevar.
intermedium
—JMM ASP.1 Chinese Taiwan X78753&X78774 Moncalvo et al. 1994
Ganoderma curtisii G. curtisii CBS 100131 North Carolina, USA JQ781848 This study
G. curtisii G. curtisii CBS 100132 North Carolina, USA JQ781849 This study
Ganoderma flexipes G. flexipes Wei 5491 Hainan, China JQ781850 This study
G. flexipes G. flexipes Wei 5494 Hainan, China JN383979 Cao and Yuan 2012
Ganoderma lucidum G. lucidum Dai 2272 Sweden JQ781851 This study
G. lucidum G. lucidum RYV 33217 Norway Z37096&Z37073 Moncalvo et al. 1994
G. lucidum G. lucidum CBS 270.81 France Z37049&Z37099 Moncalvo et al. 1994
G. lucidum G. lucidum CBS 176.30 UK AF094511&AF044490 Park et al. (unpublished)
G. lucidum G. lucidum Dai 11593 Finland JQ781852 This study
G. lucidum Ganoderma tsugae Dai 3937 Jilin, China JQ781853 This study
G. lucidum G. tsugae Yuan 5649 Jilin, China JQ781854 This study
G. lucidum G. tsugae Zhang 0981 northern China X78748&X78769 Moncalvo et al. 1994
Ganoderma lingzhi G. tsugae RSH J2* Japan X78746&X78767 Moncalvo et al. 1994
G. lingzhi G. tsugae RSH 1109 Japan X78747&X78768 Moncalvo et al. 1994
G. lingzhi G. tsugae RSH BLC* Chinese Taiwan Z37097&Z37078 Moncalvo et al. 1994
G. lingzhi G. lucidum HMAS 60537 China Z37050&Z37074 Moncalvo et al. 1994
G. lingzhi G. lucidum ACCC 5.65 China X87354&X87364 Hseu et al. 1996
G. lingzhi G. lucidum WD-565 Japan EU021455 Wang et al. 2009b
G. lingzhi G. lucidum WD-2038 Japan EU021456 Wang et al. 2009b
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12573* Liaoning, China JQ781855 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Cui 4018 Jiangsu, China JQ781856 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Cui 10165 Zhejiang, China JQ781857 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Wu 1006-38
(holotype)
Hubei, China JQ781858 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Cui 9164 Shandong, China JQ781859 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 10631 Anhui, China JQ781860 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12438* Henan, China JQ781861 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Cui 6982 Tianjin, China JQ781862 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Li 245 Henan, China JQ781863 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12479* Anhui, China JQ781864 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum IFP 01021* Hubei, China JQ781865 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12443* Guangdong, China JQ781866 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12374 Yunan, China JQ781867 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 3583 Hunan, China JQ781868 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12441* Zhejiang, China JQ781869 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12426* Sichuan, China JQ781870 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12425* Shandong, China JQ781871 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12447* Fujian, China JQ781872 This study
G. lingzhi G. lucidum Dai 12449* Jiangsu, China JQ781873 This study
Ganoderma multipileum G. lucidum JMM P93-1 Philippines X78745&X78766 Moncalvo et al. 1994
G. multipileum G. lucidum BCRC 36123 India EU021459 Wang et al. 2009b
G. multipileum G. lucidum BCRC 37043 Chinese Taiwan EU021460 Wang et al. 2009b
G. multipileum G. lucidum Dai 9521 Hainan, China JQ781874 This study
Ganoderma oregonense G. oregonense CBS 265.88 Oregon, USA JQ781875 This study
G. oregonense G. oregonense CBS 266.88 Washington, USA JQ781876 This study
G. resinaceum G. resinaceum CBS 194.76 Netherlands X78737&X78758 Moncalvo et al. 1994
52 Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62
sequencing with the same primers used in PCR procedure
and/or the additional newly designed primers in this study.
G-Intron F1 (GGA ACC TAA GGA AGA CTA TTA C), G-
Intron R1 (TCA GGG ATG TTA GTT TCT ACA) and G-
Intron R2 (GGG TAT CTA ACC GTG GAA TCA GA) were
newly designed for sequencing the intron of mt-SSU region.
Two additional primers G-RPB2-F1 (CAT CGA GTT CTT
GGA GGA GTG G) and G-RPB2-R1 (CGG AAT GAT
GCT GGC ACA GAC A) were for RPB2. G-TEF1-F1
(GGT GAG TTC GAG GCT GGT ATC T) and G-TEF1-
R1 (CGG GTA CTC GTT GTA AGA CTC) were for
TEF1-α.
The newly-generated sequences were assembled and
modified manually according to the chromatograms in Con-
tigExpress (Vector NTI Suite 6.0, InforMax Inc.) and then
submitted to GenBank. The phylogenetic analysis included
nuc-ITS sequences from our lab work and GenBank
(Table 1). Amauroderma rude var. intermedium J.S. Furtado
and Tomophagus colossus (Fr.) Murrill were selected as
outgroup (Moncalvo et al. 1994; Wang et al. 2009b). All
sequences were aligned with Clustal X 2.0 (Larkin et al.
2007) using default settings and further optimized manually
using BioEdit 7.0.5.3 (Hall 1999) to allow maximum align-
ment and minimize gaps. The alignment was deposited at
TreeBASE (Accession No: 12548).
Phylogenetic analysis was performed using maximum
parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian
algorithm (BA). The parameters were set as follows: 1) MP:
the analysis was performed in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford
2002). Heuristic search with TBR branch swapping was
implemented with 1000 replicates of random-addition se-
quence. All characters were equally weighted and gaps were
treated as missing data. MAXTREES was set to auto-
increase. Bootstrap analysis was carried out with 1,000
replicates using the heuristic search (Felsenstein 1985). Tree
length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI),
rescaled consistency index (RC), and homoplasy index (HI)
were calculated for all parsimony trees. 2) ML: The analysis
was conducted in PhyML3.0 (Guindon and Gascuel 2003).
The best-fit model was selected by jModelTest (Posada
2008) according to Corrected Akaike Information Criterion
(AICc). Bootstrap analysis was performed with 100 repli-
cates. 3) BA: The analysis was run in MrBayes3.1.2
(Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). The best-fit model of
nucleotide evolution was selected by Hierarchical Likeli-
hood Ratio Tests (hLRT) in MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander
2004). Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm
(Larget and Simon 1999) was conducted to calculate Bayes-
ian posterior probabilities. Four Markov chains were run for
3,000,000 generations with the trees sampled every 100
th
generation. The average standard deviation of split frequen-
cies was restricted to be below 0.01. The option of burnin
was set to discard 10 % trees (Hall 2004).
Results
Phylogeny
The nuc-ITS dataset contains 53 sequences representing 12
taxa. Amplification of the nuc-ITS region yielded approxi-
mately 650 bp fragments. After deleting the ambiguous sites
at both ends and 5.8S region in the alignment, 409 charac-
ters remained for phylogenetic analysis.
For MP analysis, 286 characters are constant, 33 charac-
ters are variable, but parsimony-uninformative, and 90
characters are parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded
2992 most parsimonious trees (CI00.769608, RI00.928463,
RC 00.714552, HI 00.230392), and one of them is shown in
Fig. 3. For ML analysis: the best-fit model was HKY +G
selected by AICc in jModelTest. For BA analysis, the best-
fit model was HKY+G selected in MrModeltest 2.3. Four
simultaneous Monte Carlo chains were run for 3,000,000
generations, and the average standard deviation of split
Table 1 (continued)
Accepted names Names from
specimens/GenBank
Specimen/
strain
numbers
Locality GenBank No. Reference
G. resinaceum G. resinaceum CBS 152.27 UK Z37062&Z37085 Moncalvo et al. 1994
Ganoderma
sichuanense
G. sichuanense HMAS 42798
(holotype)
Sichuan, China, JQ781877 This study
G. sichuanenseG. sichuanense Cui 7691 Guangdong, China JQ781878 This study
Ganoderma tropicum G. tropicum Dai 9724 Hainan, China JQ781879 This study
G. tropicum G. tropicum Yuan 3490 Yunnan, China JQ781880 This study
G. tropicum G. tropicum BCRC 37122 Chinese Taiwan EU021457 Wang et al. 2009b
Tomophagus colossus —CBS 216.36 Unknown Z37071&Z37091 Moncalvo et al. 1994
* indicates the specimens or strains were artificially cultivated.
Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62 53
frequencies was 0.006618. As the trees generated by ML
and BA analyses shared nearly identical topology with that
of MP analysis, MP bootstrap, ML bootstrap and Bayesian
Posterior Probabilities were respectively labelled near the
nodes in the same tree (Fig. 1).
In the phylogenetic tree, the samples named G. lucidum
separated into three distinct clades. They were respectively
listed as Clade I, Clade II and Clade III in Fig. 1.
Clade I includes 22 wild and cultivated samples named
G. lucidum, as well as three samples named G. tsugae, all
from East Asia. These taxa form a monophyletic lineage
with strong support (MP/ML/BA 095/97/1.00), and are dis-
tantly related to G. lucidum from Europe in Clade III.
Samples of G. curtisii (Berk.) Murrill from North America
form a well-supported clade (MP/ML/BA084/92/0.95) and
serves as the sister clade to Clade I.
Clade II comprises four samples named ‘G. lucidum’
from tropical Asia, and represents a separate lineage of ‘G.
lucidum’from Asia and has high bootstrap support value
and posterior probability value (MP/ML/BA 097/94/1.00).
All four samples in this clade represent G. multipileum
(Wang et al. 2009b).
Clade III contains five samples of G. lucidum from
Europe as well as three samples labelled ‘G. tsugae’from
northern China. This clade has quite low support (ML/
Bayes071/0.73), but forms a robust group with high support
(MP/ML/BA0100/99/1.00) with its sister clade containg G.
oregonense Murrill from America.
In addition to G. multipileum and ‘G. tsugae’mentioned
above, another three similar species, G. flexipes, G. sichua-
nense and G. tropicum, form the well-supported clades (G.
flexipes, MP/ML/BA 0100/100/1.00; G. sichuanense MP/
ML/BA0100/100/1.00; G. tropicum MP/ML/BA0100/98/
1.00; Fig. 1). They are not closely related to ‘G. lucidum’
from East Asia in phylogeny.
Taxonomy
Ganoderma lingzhi Sheng H. Wu, Y. Cao & Y.C. Dai, sp.
nov. (Figs. 2,3)
MycoBank no.: MB 564240
CHINA. Hubei Province, Wuhan, Jiufeng National For-
est Park, alt. 90 m, on the ground in forest of Quercus,29
June 2010, Wu 1006–38 (holotype in TNM, isotype in
BJFC, IFP).
Etymology lingzhi (Lat.): referring to the Chinese name
“Lingzhi”, a highly prized Ganoderma fungus in Chinese
folklore.
Fruitbody Basidiocarps annual, stipitate, corky and without
odor, but bitter when fresh, becoming hard corky to woody
hard when dry. Pilei variable, from semicircle, shell-like,
reniform to circular, occasionally lobed, corky, projecting up
to 16 cm, 17 cm broad and 2.7 cm thick. Pileal surface
weakly laccate when juvenile, strongly laccate with age,
cinnamon-buff to clay-buff when juvenile, orange-brown
to reddish brown with age, often with more or less concen-
tric zones especially near the margin and fine furrows in the
middle; margin acute to obtuse, sometimes with slight
waves, color variable, orange-brown, yellowish brown,
cinnamon-buff to buff when juvenile, becoming orange-
brown to reddish brown with age. Stipe flattened or sub-
cylindrical, lateral, dorso-lateral, horizontally lateral or ec-
centric, orange-yellow to yellowish brown when juvenile,
becoming reddish brown to vinaceous brown with age, up to
22 cm long and 3.5 cm thick. Pore surface white when
juvenile, turning sulphur yellow at maturity, turning brown
to dark brown when bruised, usually straw-colored when
dry; pores circular or angular, mostly entire, (4–)5–6(–7) per
mm, (40–)80–140(–160) μm in diam; dissepiments (60–)
80–120(–140) μm. Context not completely homogeneous in
color, the upper part buff, the lower part clay-buff, corky,
without concentric growth zones, up to 0.5 cm thick at base,
often with 1–2 black melanoid bands in the mature basidio-
carps. Tubes clay-buff, woody hard, not stratified, up to
2.2 cm long.
Hyphal structure Hyphal system trimitic; generative hyphae
bearing clamp connections, hyaline, thin-walled, infrequent;
skeletal hyphae dominant, thick-walled to subsolid, fre-
quently dichotomous branched; binding hyphae thick-
walled with a narrow lumen to subsolid; all the hyphae
IKI–, CB+; tissues darkening in KOH.
Context Generative hyphae not observed; skeletal hyphae
dominant, pale brown to brown, thick-walled to subsolid,
frequently branched, interwoven, 3–4.5 μm in diam; bind-
ing hyphae abundant, brownish, thick-walled with a narrow
lumen to subsolid, flexuous, interwoven, 1–2.1 μm in diam.
Tubes Generative hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, moderately
branched and clamped, 1.3–2.8 μm in diam; skeletal hyphae
dominant, pale brown to distinctly brown, thick-walled with a
medium or narrow lumen to subsolid, frequently branched,
strongly interwoven, 2–4μm in diam; binding hyphae brown-
ish, thick-walled to almost solid, frequently branched, flexuous,
interwoven, 1–1.8 μm in diam; basidia barrel-shaped with 4
sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 14–18× 6–10 μm;
basidioles in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller.
Cutis Composed of a vertical and closely-packed palisade
of cells; cells clavate, brown, thick-walled to subsolid, oc-
casionally with blunt outgrowths or protuberances in the
apical or lateral parts, moderately to strongly amyloid at
maturity, 30–50× 5–10 μm.
54 Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62
Spores Basidiospores ellipsoid, truncate at maturity, yellow-
ish brown, IKI–, CB+, double-walled, exospore smooth,
endospore with moderate to coarse echinulae, sometimes
even to short ridges up to 1.2 μm long, (8–)9–10.7(–12)×
(5.2–)5.8–7(–7.5) μm, L09.74 μm, W06.38 μm, Q01.45–
1.59 (n0300/10; the exospore included and the turgid ve-
sicular appendix excluded); (9.2–)9.5–11.2(–13)× (5.2–)
5.6–7(–7.8) μm, L010.27 μm, W 06.28 μm, Q 01.54–
1.74 (n090/6; the exospore included and the turgid vesicu-
lar appendix included); (6.4–)7–8.2(–9) × (4.5–)4.9–5.7
(–6.2) μm, L07.58 μm, W05.19 μm, Q 01.38–1.56
(n0300/10; the exospore excluded).
Additional specimens (paratypes in IFP or mentioned by
herbarium code) studied. China. Anhui Province, Hefei,
on dead tree of Quercus, 25 September 2008, Dai 10631.
Hubei Province, Wuhan, Maanshan National Forest Park, on
the ground in forest of Quercus, 30 June 2010, Wu 1006-75
(TNM), Wu 1006-76 (TNM). Hunan Province, Changsha,
Yuelushan, on root of Castanopsis, 14. July.2011 Dai
12458; on rotten angiosperm stump, 5 July 2002, Dai
3583; Yizhang County, Mangshan Nature Reserve, on
stump of Castanea, 26 June 2007, Dai 8172. Jiangsu Prov-
ince, Nanjing, Zijinshan, on angiosperm stump, 22 August
2006, Cui 4018. Jiangxi Province, Jiujiang County, South
Lake Park, on angiosperm stump 10 October 2008, Cui
6109; Fenyi County, Dagangshan Nature Reserve, on an-
giosperm wood, 18 September 2008, Dai 10457; on living
tree of Quercus, 22 September 2009, Cui 7848 & 7849.
Shandong Province, Taian, Taishan Nature Reserve, on fall-
en trunk of Quercus, 2 August 2010, Cui 9166; on rotten
wood of Quercus, 2 August 2010, Cui 9164; Yantai,
Kunyushan Nature Reserve, on stump of Quercus, 23 Au-
gust 2010, Dai 11701. Sichuan Province, Dujiangyan Coun-
ty, Qingchenshan, on angiosperm stump, 13 September
2010, Cui 9223; Mianyang, Longshan, on stump of Cyclo-
balanopsis, 10 October 2009, Dai 11958. Tianjin, Ji County,
Panshan, on root of Quercus, 1 August 2009, Cui 6982.
Yunnan Province, Tengchong County, Gaoligongshan Na-
ture Reserve, on angiosperm stump, 24 October 2009, Cui
8032; Puer County, Laiyanghe Nature Reserve, on root of
Castanea,9June2011,Dai 12374. Zhejiang Province,
Fig. 1 One of the most parsimonious trees illustrating the phylogeny
of Ganoderma lingzhi and related species within the genus based on
nuc-ITS sequences. Clade stabilities were calculated from MP (≥50 %),
ML (≥50 %) and BA (≥0.70). Branches that got strong support from all
three analyses (MP, ML and BA) are in bold
Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62 55
Yongjia County, Longwan Lake Forest Park, on angiosperm
stump, 21 August 2011, Cui 10165.
Molecular data In addition to nuc-ITS sequences (Table 1)
for phylogenetic analysis, another four gene fragments of
mt-SSU, RPB1, RPB2, and TEF1-αare supplied in Gen-
Bank for further comparison with the other related species
(mt-SSU:Cui9166, Shandong, JX029987; Dai12479, culti-
vated, Anhui, JX029988; Wu 1006-38, Hubei, JX029989;
Dai12574 cultivated, Liaoning, JX029990. RPB1: Cui9166,
Shandong, JX029982; Dai12479, cultivated, Anhui,
JX029983; Wu 1006-38, Hubei, JX029984; Dai12574, cul-
tivated, Liaoning, JX029985. RPB2: Cui9166, Shandong,
JX029978; Dai12479, cultivated, Anhui, JX029979; Wu
1006-38, Hubei, JX029980; Dai12574, cultivated, Liaon-
ing, JX029981. TEF1-α: Cui9166, Shandong, JX029974;
Dai12479, cultivated, Anhui, JX029975; Wu 1006-38,
Hubei, JX029976; Dai12574, cultivated, Liaoning,
JX029977). Although the above mentioned gene sequences
are available for G. lingzhi, it is impossible to carry out
multigene analysis for phylogeny, because these genes are
not available for other species of the genus.
56 Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62
Fig. 2 Basidiocarps of Ganoderma lingzhi.a–f. Cultivated fruting bodies of Ganoderma lingzhi g–o. Wild fruting bodies of Ganoderma lingzhi
(g–h. holotype; i–o. paratypes)
Discussion
Analysis of nuc-ITS sequences shows that the strains of
wild and cultivated G. lingzhi from East Asia (Fig. 1)
are nested in a strongly-supported Clade I (MP/ML/
BA098/98/1.00). Clade I is clearly separated from
Clade III in phylogeny, where the European G. lucidum
is nested (Fig. 1). Therefore, the newly introduced spe-
cies, G.lingzhi, which is widely distributed and culti-
vated in East Asia, is not conspecific with G. lucidum
from Europe.
Ganoderma lingzhi was long assigned to G. lucidum as
both species have a reddish brown pileal surface, similar-
sized basidiospores and mostly regular clavate cuticle cells.
However, several morphological features separate G. lingzhi
from the European G. lucidum. In mature basidiocarps, G.
lingzhi bears 1–2 black melanoid bands in the context while
G. lucidum lacks this structure. G. lingzhi normally has a
sulphur-yellow to straw-colored pore surface and thick dis-
sepiments (80–120 μm) at maturity. In contrast, G. lucidum
has a white pore surface and thin dissepiments (40–80 μm).
The cuticle cells of G.lucidum are also usually longer (47–
70 μm) than that of G. lingzhi.
In addition to the identification of our materials of G.
lingzhi and G. lucidum, we also conducted morphological
studies for the species similar to G. lucidum.Zhaoand
Zhang (2000)andWuandDai(2005)alsohavemen-
tioned that ‘G. lucidum’(G. lingzhi) from China has
yellow pore surface, while the European G. lucidum al-
ways has a white pore surface (Ryvarden and Gilbertson
1993; Ryvarden 1994). Kim et al. (2001) also found that
the specimens labelled G. lucidum from Korea have pale
brownish thread-like tissues in the centre of context (i.e.,
melanoid bands). These descriptions of ‘G. lucidum’from
East Asia are consistent with our observation of G.
lingzhi.
After studying type specimens of Ganoderma species
from China that share similar morphological features with
G.lingzhi, we found that they can be divided into 3 catego-
ries: 1) Ganoderma species with concentric growth zones in
Fig. 3 Microscopic structures
of Ganoderma lingzhi a.
basidiospores; b. basidia and
basidioles; c. apical cells from
the cuticle; d. hyphae from
trama. e. hyphae from context
(scale bars: 10 μm)
Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62 57
the context: G.chenghaiense J.D. Zhao and G.simaoense
J.D. Zhao. G.chenghaiense has been resolved as G. multi-
pileum by Wang et al. (2009a). Based on our study, G.
simaoense is a tropically-distributed species due to its con-
centric growth zones in the context, which can separate this
species from G. lingzhi clearly. 2) Ganoderma species with
small pilei and slender stipes: G.atrum J.D. Zhao et al., G.
calidophilum J.D. Zhao et al., G.hainanense J.D. Zhao et
al. and G.parviungulatum J.D. Zhao & X.Q. Zhang. They
were all reported from Hainan Province of China, and they
are conspecific with G. flexipes Pat. (Data to be published in
another paper). 3) G. sichuanense is an accepted species and
its morphological differences from G. lingzhi are discussed
below.
Among the Chinese Ganoderma species, G.flexipes
Pat., G. multipileum Ding Hou, G. sichuanense J.D.
Zhao & X.Q. Zhang, G. tropicum (Jungh.) Bres. and
‘G. tsugae’Murrill are the mostly similar species to G.
lingzhi because they share a reddish brown pileal sur-
face, similar basidiospores and cuticle cells (Fig. 4).
However, the morphological characteristics can distin-
guish G. lingzhi from these five species through careful
observation. G. flexipes is separated from G. lingzhi by
its mostly small pileus, slender and long stipe, and
yellow brown to dark brown context when mature. G.
multipileum is distinguished from G. lingzhi by its dis-
tinct concentric growth zones in context at maturity, and
finely echinulate basidiospores. Ganoderma lingzhi is
often associated with Fagaceae (e.g., Castanea,Cyclo-
balanopsis and Quercus) and is distributed in temperate
to subtropical East Asia, while G. multipileum inhabits
Fabaceae trunks (e.g., Acacia,Delonix) and is distribut-
ed in tropical and subtropical Asia (Wang et al. 2009b).
Ganoderma sichuanense differs from G. lingzhi in its
sessile basidiocarps and smaller basidiospores (7.4–9.2×
5–6.6 μm). Ganoderma tropicum differs from G. lingzhi
by its mostly sessile basidiocarps, dark brown context,
concentric growth zones in the context and mostly ir-
regular cuticle cells. Similar to G. multipileum,G. tro-
picum also inhabits Fabaceae trees. The Chinese ‘G.
tsugae’is separated from G. lingzhi by the absence of
melanoid bands in the context, white pore surface and
thin dissepiments (20–60 μm) when mature. The feature
differences among G. lingzhi and some other similar
species are listed in Table 2.
Ganoderma curtisii, a species originally described from
North America (Moncalvo and Ryvarden 1997), was found
to be the most closely phylogenetically related species to G.
lingzhi (MP/ML/BA099/100/1.00, Fig. 3). Two strains of
G.curtisii (CBS 100131, 100132) from the type locality
were cultivated to obtain their fruiting bodies for comparison.
Fruiting bodies of G.curtisii resemble G.lingzhi when
juvenile as they share a yellow to buff pileal surface
and white pore surface. At maturity, G.curtisii still
bears yellowish brown to olivaceous buff pileal surface
withathinandeasilyscaledoffsoftcrust,whileG.
lingzhi often bears a reddish brown pileal surface with a
hard and non-breakable crust. In addition, G.curtisii
usually has a white pore surface and thin dissepiments
(40–80 μm) when mature. In contrast, G. lingzhi has a
yellow pore surface when mature and its dissepiments
are thick (80–120 μm). Microscopically, G.curtisii has
more inflated, loosely-arranged cuticle cells with wider
apical parts ((6–)8–12(–14) μm, W09.98 μm), while G.
lingzhi often has more slender, closely-packed cuticle
cells with narrower apical parts ((5–)6–9(–10) μm,
W07.34).
Wang and Yao (2009) reported that G. sichuanense can
represent ‘G. lucidum’in China. Our analysis indicates that
G. sichuanense is distantly related to G. lingzhi, but it is
closely phylogenetically related to G. resinaceum (Fig. 1).
Coupled with the obvious morphological differences from
G. lingzhi (Fig. 4, Table 2), we confirm that G. sichuanense
is a distinct species.
The nuc-ITS sequences obtained from four samples of
‘G. lucidum’(ACCC 5.65 and HMAS 60537 from China;
WD–565 and WD–2038 from Japan) in previous studies
(Moncalvo et al. 1994,1995; Wang et al. 2009b) are also
Fig. 4 Basidiocarps of Ganoderma lingzhi and its most similar species
in China. a.Ganoderma flexipes;b.Ganoderma lingzhi (holotype); c.
Ganoderma lucidum (‘Ganoderma tsugae’). d.Ganoderma multipi-
leum;e.Ganoderma sichuanense (holotype); f.Ganoderma tropicum
58 Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62
included in this study. They are also nested in Clade I
(Fig. 1), which is G. lingzhi.
The mt-SSU sequences of ‘G. lucidum’(IFO 31863
(KCTC 6729) from Japan; IMSNU 30042, KCTC 6366,
KCTC 6530b, KCTC 6531 and KCTC 6532 from Korea)
in the study of Hong and Jung (2004) share very high
similarity (>99 %) with that of G. lingzhi in our study. These
Japanese and Korean ‘G. lucidum’are determined as G.
lingzhi in this study. Accordingly, G. lingzhi has a distribu-
tion in China, Japan and Korea.
Moncalvo et al. (1995) concluded that an Asian spe-
cies was mistaken for G. tsugae from his phylogenetic
study of the cultivated Ganoderma species labelled G.
tsugae (RSH J2, RSH 1109, RSH BLC) from East Asia.
These sequences were also included in our analysis and
these strains are nested in the well-supported Clade I
(Fig. 3). Consequently, they are determined in this study
as G. lingzhi.
We investigated 35 specimens or strains of cultivated
“Lingzhi”from 10 representative production sites in China.
In spite of the highly variable basidiocarps of the different
“Lingzhi”varieties, the analysis of nuc-ITS sequences
shows that they share high similarity (>99 %) and clustered
in a single clade with a robust support. This indicates that
the strains of “Lingzhi”widely cultivated in China represent a
single species (i.e., G.lingzhi).
The strain labelled G. tsugae (Zhang 0981) from studies of
Moncalvo et al. (1994,1995) and two specimens named ‘G.
tsugae’(Dai 3937, Yuan 5649) collected on Larix from north-
eastern China were also analyzed. The results showed that
these samples are nested in Clade III and cluster with G.
lucidum from Europe. Similar results were mentioned by
Moncalvo et al. (1994;1995). The Chinese ‘G. tsugae’(Yuan
5649, nuc-ITS:JQ781854, mt-SSU:JX029986) also shares
Table 2 Morphological characters of Ganoderma lingzhi and its most similar species in China
Species Stipe Melanoid bands in
mature fruiting
body
Context color Concentric
growth zones
in context
Dissepiments
(μm)
Cuticle cells Basidiospores (μm) Pore color
(at maturity)
Ganoderma flexipes present present not completely homogeneous;
yellow brown to dark brown
absent thick; 80–120
(–140)
mostly regular; clavate (8.5–)9–10.3(–11)× ( 5–)
5.3–7
white to pale sulphur
yellow
Ganoderma lingzhi present present not completely homogeneous;
light buff, buff, clay buff
to snuff buff
absent thick; (60–)80–
120(–140)
mostly regular; clavate (8–)9–10.7(–12)× (5.2–)
5.8–7(–7.5)
pale yellow, sulphur
yellow to straw-
colored
Ganoderma lucidum
(0‘G. tsugae’from China)
present absent not completely homogeneous;
white, cream to pale clay
brown
absent thin; 20–60(–80) mostly regular; clavate (8.8–)9–10.7(–11)× (5.3–)
5.7–6.6(–7)
white
Ganoderma multipileum present, rarely
absent
present not completely homogeneous;
clay buff to fulvous
present thick; 60–120
(–160)
mostly regular; clavate (8–)8.8–10.4(–11.3)×(5–)
5.6–6.9(–7.2)
cream to straw-
colored
Ganoderma sichuanense absent present not completely homogeneous;
buff to pale clay buff
absent thick; (80–)100–
140(–200)
mostly regular; clavate (7–)7.4–9.2(–9.3)× (4.6–)
5–6.6(–6.8)
buff yellow
Ganoderma tropicum absent, sometimes
present
present homogeneous; fulvous present thick; (60–)80–
140(–160)
mostly irregular; clavate,
often with blunt outgrowths
or protuberances
(8.3–)8.8–10.7(–11.2)×
(5–)5.4–6.3(–6.8)
cream to pale straw-
colored
Table 3 The studied Ganoderma species from China in this paper
Species Names
Accepted
species
G. flexipes Pat.
G. lingzhi Sheng H. Wu, Y. Cao & Y.C. Dai
G. lucidum (Curtis) P. Karst.
G. multipileum Ding Hou
G. sichuanense J.D. Zhao & X.Q. Zhang
G. tropicum (Jungh.) Bres.
Unaccepted
species
G. atrum J.D. Zhao, L.W. Hsu & X.Q. Zhang
G. calidophilum J.D. Zhao, L.W. Hsu & X.Q. Zhang
G. chenghaiense J.D. Zhao
G. hainanense J.D. Zhao, L.W. Hsu & X.Q. Zhang
G. parviungulatum J.D. Zhao & X.Q. Zhang
G. simaoense J.D. Zhao
G. tsugae Murrill
Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62 59
high similarity (>99 %) in nuc-ITS and mt-SSU sequences with
G. lucidum from UK (CBS 176.30, nuc-ITS:
AF094511&AF044490, mt-SSU:AF248324&AF248325).In
addition, the Chinese ‘G. tsugae’has stipitate basidiocarps, a
reddish brown pileus, a white pore surface and thin dissepi-
ments (20–60(–80) μm) when mature, but lacks melanoid
bands in the context. All of these macro-morphological char-
acters fit that of G. lucidum from Europe with such micro-
morphological features as regular cuticle cells and similar basi-
diospores. Thus, the ‘G. tsugae’samples from conifers in
northeastern China are identified as G. lucidum in this study.
Studies of Moncalvo et al. (1995) indicated that G. lucidum
sensu stricto was distributed in northern and southern Europe,
and probably extended to China. Based on more molecular and
morphological evidences from more samples, our study con-
firmed that the distribution of G. lucidum includes northeastern
China. Geographic distribution of G. lucidum resembles the
Europe (-Siberia)-Northeast Asia (-Southwestern China) distri-
bution pattern of Heterobasidion Bref. and Chroogomphus
(Singer) O.K. Mill (Dai et al. 2003;Lietal.2009).
Ganoderma species have been widely cultivated in Asia
and consumed worldwide, among which most commercial
materials are named as G. lucidum. In addition to the Asian
origin, some commercial strains are from America, e.g.
Fungi Perfecti ‘G. lucdium’, which was also determined as
another different species from the true G. lucidum (Smith
and Sivasithamparam 2000). As misidentification of Gano-
derma strains may hinder strategies for drung discovery
(Wasser et al. 2006) and create complications for publica-
tions, patents and products (Wasser 2011), the correct iden-
tification of commercial and research-oriented Ganoderma
strains especially those labelled G. lucidum is obviously
important. The species identity of the ‘G. lucidum’collec-
tions outside Eurasia should be further studied. The species
of Ganoderma studied and accepted in this study from
China can be found in Table 3.
Specimens of related Ganoderma species studied G. cur-
tissi.USA. North Carolina, Durham, Duke gardens, on the
base of living tree of Quercus, November 1996, JM 96/80
(CBS 100131); Durham, yard Alabama street, on the base of
living hardwood tree, 6 December 1996, JM 96/81(CBS
100132). G. flexipes.China. Fujian Province, Wuyishan
County, Tianyoufeng, on the ground of mixed forest, 26
August 2006, Cui 4122. Hainan Province, Baoting County,
Diaoluoshan Nature Reserve, on the ground of angiosperm
forest, 30 June 2010, Wei 5491 &5494; Ledong County,
Jianfengling Nature Reserve, on the root of dead angio-
sperm, 25 June 2010, Wei 5200; on the ground of forest,
15 November 2007, Yang 407.G. lucidum.Finland. Espoo,
Westend, Varsasaari, on the stump of Picea, 1 August 2005,
Stella (H). Helsinki, on the dead tree of Quercus 4 Septem-
ber 2004, Dai 5857. Vantaa, 18 October 2009, Dai 11593.
Varsinais-Suomi, on ground, Salo 11212 (H). Romania.
Transsilvania Distr., on Quercus, 16 September 1955, Sila-
ghi (H). Sweden. Halland, Västergotland, on rotten wood of
Corylus, 22 August 1996, Dai 2272.Skane,Brunby,on
Fagus, 29 September 1985, Nordin (H). UK. England,
Windsor Great Park, X 2003, HMAS 86598 (HMAS). G.
lucidum (‘G. tsugae’).China. Jilin Province, Antu County,
Changbaishan Nature Reserve, on fallen gymnosperm trunk,
6 September 1993, Dai 1115; on the stump of Pinus,21
September 2002, Dai 3935; on the fallen trunk of Larix,21
September 2002, Dai 3937, 12 December 2007, Dai 9028,
10 August 2011, Yuan 5649.G. multipileum.China.
Hainan Province, Haikou, on angiosperm stump, 21 May
2008, Yuan 4146; on the stump of Acacia, 23 May 2008,
Dai 9523 &9524; on the stump of Hevea, 4 June 2008, Dai
10042.G. sichuanense.China. Guangdong Province,
Guangzhou, South China Botanical Garden, on angiosperm
stump, 19 September 2009, Cui 7691. Sichuan Province,
Panzhihua, on angiosperm stump, 1976, HMAS 42798 (ho-
lotype, HMAS). G. tropicum.China. Guangxi Autonomous
Region, Chongzuo County, Nonggang Nature Reserve, on
dead angiosperm root, 7 July 2007, Zhou 269.Hainan
Province, Baoting County, Tropical Botanical Garden, on
angiosperm stump, 27 May 2008, Dai 9724. Yunnan Prov-
ince, Xishuangbanna, Menglun Green Stone Forest Park, on
angiosperm stump, 4 August 2005, Dai 6721; Menglun
Tropical Botanical Garden, on living tree of Cycas,10
September 2005, Yuan 2300; on the living angiosperm, 12
September 2007, Yuan 3490.
Acknowledgements We thank Drs. T.Z. Wei and X.C. Wang (HMAS,
China), Prof. L. Ryvarden and Dr. K.-H. Larsson (O, Norway) for loans
of specimens. We are grateful to Prof. S. P. Wasser (UOH, Israel) for
offering some important literatures and to CBS for offering some Gano-
derma cutltures. We are indebted to Dr. D.M. Wang (GIM, China) and Dr.
J.M. Moncalvo (ROM, Canada) for offering suggestions during this
study. We appreciate Dr. H.S. Yuan (IFP, China) for improving the
drawings, and Dr. S.H. He (BJFC, China) for offering some Ganoderma
images. Y.C. Dai and S.H. Wu are deeply indebted to Dr. T. Niemelä (H,
Finland) for his friendly support of their studies at Botanical Museum of
the University of Helsinki. We are grateful to Prof. K.D. Hyde (Chiang
Rai, Thailand) for improving the manuscript. The research was financed
by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos.
30910103907, 31070022).
References
Aly AH, Debbab A, Proksch P (2011) Fifty years of drug discovery
from fungi. Fungal Divers 50:3–19
Anonymous (1969) Flora of British fungi. Colour identification chart.
Her Majesty´s Stationery Office, London
Bao XF, Wang XS, Dong Q, Fang JN, Li XY (2002) Structural features
of immunologically active polysaccharides from Ganoderma luci-
dum. Phytochemistry 59:175–181
Bazzalo ME, Wright JE (1982) Survey of the Argentine species of the
Ganoderma lucidum complex. Mycotaxon 16:295–325
60 Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62
Binder M, Larsson KH, Matheny PB, Hibbett DS (2010) Amylocorti-
ciales ord. nov. and Jaapiales ord. nov.: Early-diverging clades of
Agaricomycetidae were dominated by corticioid forms. Mycolo-
gia 102:865–880
Cao Y, Yuan HS (2012) Ganoderma mutabile sp. nov. from southwest-
ern China based on morphological and molecular data. Mycol
Progr. doi:10.1007/s11557-012-0819-9
Dai YC (2010) Hymenochaetaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal
Divers 45:131–343
Dai YC (2012) Polypore diversity in China with an annotated checklist
of Chinese polypores. Mycoscience 53:49–80
Dai YC, Vainio EJ, Hantula J, Niemelä T, Korhonen K (2003) In
vestigation on Heterobasidion annosum s.lat. in central and east-
ern Asia with the aid of mating tests and DNA fingerprinting. For
Path 33:269–286
Dai YC, Yang ZL, Cui BK, Yu CJ, Zhou LW (2009) Species diversity
and utilization of medicinal mushrooms and fungi in China (Re-
view). Int J Med Mushrooms 11:287–302
De Silva DD, Rapior S, Fons F, Bahkali AH, Hyde KD (2012)
Medicinal mushrooms in supportive cancer therapies: an ap-
proach to anti-cancer effects and putative mechanisms of action.
Fungal Divers 55:1–35
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence intervals on phylogenetics: an ap-
proach using bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
Gao YH, Zhou SF (2003) Cancer prevention and treatment by Gano-
derma, a mushroom with medicinal properties. Food Rev Int
19:275–325
Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for
basidiomycetes —application to the identification of mycorrhizae
and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118
Ge ZW, Yang ZL, Vellinga EC (2010) The genus Macrolepiota (Agar-
icaceae, Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Divers 45:81–98
Gilbertson RL, Ryvarden L (1986) North American Polypores 1.
Fungiflora, Oslo, pp 1–433
Gottlieb AM, Wright JE (1999) Taxonomy of Ganoderma from south-
ern South America: subgenus Ganoderma. Mycol Res 103:661–
673
Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast and accurate method to
estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Syst Biol
52:696–704
Hall TA (1999) Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequences alignment
editor analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp
Ser 41:95–98
Hall BG (2004) Phylogenetic trees made easy: a how-to manual, 2nd
edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 1–221
Hattori T, Ryvarden L (1994) Type studies in the Polyporaceae 25.
Species described from Japan by R. Imazeki and A. Yasuda.
Mycotaxon 50:27–46
He SH, Dai YC (2012) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Hymenochaete
and allied genera of Hymenochaetaceae (Basidiomycota) in Chi-
na. Fungal Divers. doi:10.1007/s13225-012-0174-9
Hong SG, Jung HS (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of Ganoderma based
on nearly complete mitochondrial small-subunit ribosomal DNA
sequences. Mycologia 96:742–755
Hongo T, Izawa M (1994) Yama-Kei field books No.10. Yama-Kei
Publishers Co., Ltd, Tokyo, pp 1–384, in Japanense
Hseu RS, Wang HH, Wang HF, Moncalvo JM (1996) Differentiation
and grouping of isolates of the Ganoderma lucidum complex by
random amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR compared with group-
ing on the basis of internal transcribed spacer sequences. Appl
Environ Microbiol 62:1354–1363
Hu H, Ahn NS, Yang XL, Lee YS, Kang KS (2002) Ganoderma
lucidum extract induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MCF-
7 human breast cancer cell. Int J Cancer 102:250–253
Hyde KD, Bahkali AH, Moslem MA (2010) Fungi—an unusual source
for cosmetics. Fungal Divers 43:1–9
Jong SC, Birmingham JM (1992) Medicinal benefits of the mushroom
Ganoderma. Adv Appl Microbiol 37:101–134
Kim HK, Seo GS, Kim HG (2001) Comparison of characteristics of
Ganoderma lucidum according to geographical origins (II): con-
sideration of morphological characteristics. Mycobiology 29:80–
84
Kino K, Yamashita A, Yamaoka K, Watanabe J, Tanaka S, Ko K,
Shimizu K, Tsunoo H (1989) Isolation and characterization of a
new immunomodulatory protein, ling zhi-8 (LZ-8), from Gano-
derma lucidium. J Biol Chem 264:472–478
Lai T, Gao Y, Zhou SF (2004) Global marketing of medicinal Ling Zhi
mushroom Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.:Fr.) Lloyd (Aphyllo-
phoromycetideae) products and safety concerns. Int J Med Mushr
6:189–194
Larget B, Simon DL (1999) Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for
the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol
16:750–759
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA,
McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R,
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and
Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948
Li YC, Yang ZL, Tolgor B (2009) Phylogenetic and biogeographic
relationships of Chroogomphus species as inferred from molecu-
lar and morphological data. Fungal Divers 38:85–104
Lin ZB (2007) Modern Research of Ganoderma lucidum.Peking
University Medical Press, Beijing, pp 1–359, in Chinese
Lin ZB (2009) Lingzhi: from mystery to science. Peking University
Medical Press, Beijing, pp 1–162
Liu B (1974) The Chinese medical fungi. Shanxi People’s Press,
Taiyuan, pp 1–196, in Chinese
Liu YL, Whelen S, Hall BD (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among
ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol
Biol Evol 16:1799–1808
Mao XL (1998) Economic fungi of China. Science Press, Beijing, pp
1–762, in Chinese
Matheny PB, Liu YJ, Ammirati JF, Hall BD (2002) Using RPB1
sequences to improve phylogenetic inference among mushrooms
(Inocybe, Agaricales). Am J Bot 89:688–698
Matheny PB, Wang Z, Binder M, Curtis JM, Lim YW, Nilsson RH,
Hughes KW, Petersen RH, Hofstetter V, Ammirati JF, Schoch C,
Langer GE, McLaughlin DJ, Wilson AW, Crane PE, Frøslev T, Ge
ZW, Kerrigan RW, Slot JC, Vellinga EC, Liang ZL, Aime MC,
Baroni TJ, Fischer M, Hosaka K, Matsuura K, Seidl MT, Vaura J,
Hibbett DS (2007) Contributions of rpb2 and tef1 to the phylog-
eny of mushrooms and allies (Basidiomycota, Fungi). Mol Phy-
logenet Evol 43:430–451
Min BS, Gao JJ, Nakamura N, Hattori M (2000) Triterpenes from the
spores of Ganoderma lucidum and their cytotoxicity against
meth-A and LLC tumor cells. Chem Pharm Bull 48:1026–1033
Moncalvo JM, Ryvarden L (1997) A nomenclatural study of the
Ganodermataceae Donk. Syn Fung 11:1–114
Moncalvo JM, Wang HF, Wang HH, Hseu RS (1994) The use of
ribosomal DNA sequence data for species identification and phy-
logeny in the Ganodermataceae. In: Buchanan PK, Hseu RS,
Moncalvo JM (eds) Ganoderma: systematics, phytopathology
and pharmacology. Proceedings of contributed symposium 59A,
B, 5th International Mycological Congress, Vancouver, August
14–21, 1994. National Taiwan University, Taipei, pp 31–44
Moncalvo JM, Wang HF, Hseu RS (1995) Gene phylogeny of the
Ganoderma lucidum complex based on ribosomal DNA sequen-
ces. Comparison with traditional taxonomic characters. Mycol
Res 99:1489–1499
Niemelä T, Miettinen O (2008) The identity of Ganoderma applana-
tum (Basidiomycota). Taxon 57:963–966
Núñez M, Ryvarden L (2000) East Asian polypores 1. Ganodermata-
ceae and Hymenochaetaceae. Synop Fung 13:1–168
Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62 61
Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the
author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University
Patouillard N (1907) Champignons du Kouy-tcheou. Monde d be Pl.
Seri. 2, 9: 31
Pegler DN, Yao YJ (1996) Oriental species of Ganoderma section
Ganoderma. In Wasser SP (ed). Botany and mycology for the
next millenium: collection of scientific articles devoted to the 70th
Anniversary of Academician Sytnik KM. Kyiv: Kholodny NG
Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. pp
336–347
Petersen JH (1996) Farvekort. The Danish mycological society´s
colour-chart. Foreningen til Svampekundskabens Fremme, Greve
Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol
Evol 25:1253–1256
Quanten E (1997) The polypores (Polyporaceae s.l.) of Papua New
Guinea. Opera Bot Belgica 11:1–352
Rehner SA, Buckley E (2005) A Beauveria phylogeny inferred
from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: evidence for cryptic
diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia
97:84–98
Ronquist F, HuelsenbeckJP (2003) MRBAYES 3: bayesian phylogenetic
inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574
Ryvarden L (1981) Type studies in the Polyporaceae. 12. Species
described by F.W. Junghuhn. Persoonia 11:369–372
Ryvarden L (1983) Type studies in the Polyporaceae. 14. Species
described by N. Patouillard, either alone or with other mycolo-
gists. Occas pap Farlow Herb 18:1–39
Ryvarden L (1985) Type studies in the Polyporaceae. 17. Species
described by W. A. Murrill. Mycotaxon 23:169–198
Ryvarden L (1994) Can we trust morphology in Ganoderma?In:
Buchanan PK, Hseu RS, Moncalvo JM (eds) Ganoderma: sys-
tematics, phytopathology and pharmacology. Proceedings of con-
tributed symposium 59A, B, 5th International Mycological
Congress, Vancouver, August 14–21, 1994. National Taiwan Uni-
versity, Taipei, pp 19–24
Ryvarden L (2004) Neotropical polypores Part 1. Syn Fung 19:1–229
Ryvarden L, Gilbertson RL (1993) European polypores 1. Syn Fung
6:1–387
Ryvarden L, Johansen I (1980) A preliminary polypores flora of East
Africa. Fungiflora, Oslo, pp 1–636
Sliva D, Labarrere C, Slivova V, Sedlak M, Lloyd FP Jr, Ho NWY
(2002) Ganoderma lucidum suppresses motility of highly inva-
sive breast and prostate cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Com-
mun 298:603–612
Smith BJ, Sivasithamparam K (2000) Internal transcribed spacer ribo-
somal DNA sequence of five species of Ganoderma from Aus-
tralia. Mycol Res 104:943–951
Smith BJ, Sivasithamparam K (2003) Morphological studies of Gano-
derma (Ganodermataceae) from the Australasian and Pacific
regions. Aust Syst Bot 16:487–503
Steyaert RL (1972) Species of Ganoderma and related genera mainly
of the Bogor and Leiden Herbaria. Persoonia 7:55–118
Steyaert RL (1980) Study of some Ganoderma species. Bull Jard Bot
Nat Belg 50:135–186
Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony
(*and other methods) Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates,
Sunderland
Szedlay G (2002) Is the widely used medicinal fungus the Ganoderma
lucidum (fr.) karst. sensu stricto? Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung
49:235–243
Tai FL (1979) Sylloge fungorum sinicorum. Science Press, Beijing, pp
1–1527, in Chinese
Teng SC (1934) Notes on Polyporaceae from China. Sinensia 5:198–200
Wachtel-Galor WS, Tomlinson B, Benzie IFF (2004) Ganoderma
lucidum (‘Lingzhi’), a Chinese medicinal mushroom: biomarker
responses in a controlled human supplementation study. Brit J
Nutr 91:263–269
Wang DM, Wu SH (2008) A taxonomic revision of the Ganodermata-
ceae reported from Taiwan. Mycotaxon 104:297–308
Wang XC, Yao YJ (2009) Taxonomic studies on ‘Ganoderma lucidum’
in China. Abstracts of the 5
th
International Medicinal Mushroom
Conference, Nantong, September 5–8, 2009. pp 104–106
Wang DM, Wu SH, Li TH (2009a) Two records of Ganoderma new to
mainland China. Mycotaxon 108:35–40
Wang DM, Wu SH, Su CH, Peng JT, Shih YH, Chen LC (2009b)
Ganoderma multipileum, the correct name for ‘G. lucidum’in
tropical Asia. Bot Stud 50:451–458
Wasser SP (2005) Reishi or Ling Zhi (Ganoderma lucidum). In: Coates
PM, Blackman MR, Cragg GM, Levine M, Moss J, White JD
(eds) Encyclopedia of dietary supplements. Marcel Dekker, New
York, pp 603–622
Wasser SP (2011) Current findings, future trends, and unsolved prob-
lems in studies of medicinal mushrooms. Appl Microbiol Bio-
technol 89:1323–1332
Wasser SP, Zmitrovich IV, Didukh MY, Spirin WA, Malysheva VF
(2006) Morphological traits of Ganoderma lucidum complex
highlighting G.tsugae var. jannieae: the current generalization.
Gantner, Ruggell, pp 1–187
Welti S, Courtecuisse R (2010) The Ganodermataceae in the French West
Indies (Guadeloupe and Martinique). Fungal Divers 43:103–126
White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct
sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In:
Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR proto-
cols, a guide to methods and applications. Academic, San Diego,
pp 315–322
Wu XL, Dai YC (2005) Coloured illustrations of Ganodermataceae of
China. Science Press, Beijing, pp 1–229, in Chinese
Yang ZL (2011) Molecular techniques revolutionize knowledge of
basidiomycete evolution. Fungal Divers 50:47–58
Ying JZ, Mao ZL, Ma QM, ZongLC, Wen HA (1987) Icons of medicinal
fungi from China. Science Press, Beijing, pp 1–579, in Chinese
Yu YN, Shen MZ (2003) The history of Lingzhi (Ganoderma spp.)
cultivation. Mycosystema 22:3–9, in Chinese
Zhang JS, Tang QJ, Zimmerman-Kordmann M, Reutter W, Fan H
(2002) Activation of B lymphocytes by GLIS, a bioactive proteo-
glycan from Ganoderma lucidum. Life Sci 71:623–638
Zhao JD, Zhang XQ (2000) Flora Fungorum Sinicorum 18, Ganoder-
mataceae. Science Press, Beijing, pp 1–204, in Chinese
Zhao RI, Desjardin DE, Soytong K, Perry BA, Hyde KD (2010) A
monograph of Micropsalliota in Northern Thailand based on
morphological and molecular data. Fungal Divers 45:33–79
Zhao CL, Cui BK, Dai YC (2012) New species and phylogeny of
Perenniporia based on morphological and molecular characters.
Fungal Divers. doi:10.1007/s13225-012-0177-6
62 Fungal Diversity (2012) 56:49–62