Publisher Summary The risk of tectonic seismicity should also be examined, and expressed in terms of costs that can be incorporated into the decision-making process. Tectonic seismicity, or natural seismic activity, poses potential dangers to CO2 capture and storage (CCS) surface equipment and infrastructure, such as compression, surge tank, and injection facilities and pipelines, and the cost of
... [Show full abstract] mitigating this risk—via strict construction codes and tighter operational rules—should be considered alongside other factors when evaluating prospective storage options. This chapter develops a method to compute costs associated with replacing capital equipment. Seismic hazards maps may be easily incorporated without qualification into high-level discussions of CCS analysis and site evaluation. However, without presenting these data within a structured, risk-based framework, the maps provide little value to national or region-scale assessments. While the costs of mitigating the effects of a seismic event should be incorporated into costing analyses associated with site evaluation, for most of the United States, the annual risk of significant damage is very low, and the costs associated with seismic risk is likely have only a very small impact on total project costs. However, for a few locations in the United States, incorporating these risks might affect the decision to store CO2 in geologic formations near that specific locale.