Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Procedia Engineering 47 ( 2012 ) 52 – 55
1877-7058 © 2012 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Symposium Cracoviense
Sp. z.o.o.
doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.082
Proc. Eurosensors XXVI, September 9-12, 2012, Kraków, Poland
New transient feature for metal oxide gas sensor response
processing
M. Siadat*, H. Sambemana, M. Lumbreras
a
LASC, University of Lorraine,Metz, France
Abstract
This paper presents the performance of metal oxide gas sensor response processing for the concentration
detection of an analyte diluted in a neutral atmosphere. In the field of electronic nose, two applications are
generally studied: identification of a gaseous atmosphere from other atmospheres, or the determination of
the concentration of one gaseous atmosphere. This second application needs more accuracy either in the
measurement set-up or in the response analysis. We propose in this study the performance comparison
between two traditional features extracted from the sensor response and a new feature corresponding to
the maximum (Peak) of the derivative curve of the time sensor response. The performance of this feature
to obtain fast odor concentration identifications is discussed and compared to other traditional features.
© 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords: gas sensor, signal processing; transient feature; concentration detection,; rapid identification
1. Introduction
Electronic noses are intelligent systems that play a constant growing role as general detectors of vapors
in many applications. In these devices, the sensor array plays a major role. Several types of sensors can be
employed, semiconductor metal oxide based sensors (MOX) are often used, due to their qualities: robust,
cheap, and able to react in presence of many organic or inorganic gases. Unfortunately, they are not
selective, but a strategic choice of several non selective sensors can improve the selectivity of the system,
to obtain a good discrimination of gaseous substances. In this way, an appropriate pattern recognition
method must be selected, based on an accurate treatment of the response of all the sensors. The key of a
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +33-387547626; fax: +33-387315232.
E-mail address: siadat@univ-metz.fr.
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
© 2012 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the Symposium Cracoviense
Sp. z.o.o.
53
M. Siadat et al. / Procedia Engineering 47 ( 2012 ) 52 – 55
fast and successful recognition is the feature extraction method, which needs to extract robust information
[1-2] of the sensor response curves. This fast recognition can be obtained from the transient part of the
sensor response. In this paper, we propose the performance comparison between the traditional features
and a new feature corresponding to the maximum of the derivative curve, obtained in the first minutes of
the gas exposure and deduced from the time sensor response, after an adequate filtering.
2. Characterization measurement
An array of seven MOX sensors (from Figaro and FIS) was characterized under different gaseous
dilutions from liquid pine essential oil (EO) in synthetic air by using a dynamic flow measurement [3]. To
generate different concentrations of pine EO, a constant inflow of synthetic air was bubbling into the
liquid oil. Then the outlet flow, containing evaporated EO substances, was combined with a flow of pure
synthetic air to have a total constant flow rate (100 ml/min). So the EO concentrations are defined in
terms of percent ratio between the EO outlet flow and the total flow. The resistance variation of each
sensor was collected in terms of a voltage magnitude using a fast sampling rate (2 samples/sec). The
measurement protocol was adjusted and a cycle of 10 minutes exposition of EO volatiles molecules
followed by 20 minutes of synthetic air for recovery process was adopted. This procedure allowed us to
obtain a good stabilization and recovery of all the sensors after each concentration exposure. More than
20 experiments were made for each studied concentration to constitute a consequent data basis.
The characterization measurements show a good sensibility of all the sensors (Figure 1a) to pine oil
vapour even at the lowest concentration. We note a very stable and rapid response of the SP-MW0 FIS
sensor. The other sensors have more or less sensitivity and reactivity (corresponding to the slope of the
transient part). The analysis of the same sensor responses under different concentrations of pine oil,
showed a good evolution of the dynamic and stabilized part of the signal along with the concentration.
The Figure 1b shows this observation for the SP-AQ1 sensor, where we can observe the evolution of the
stabilized value (Vs) but also the evolution of the transient part of the signal response.
Fig. 1. (a) time-responses of all the sensors to a fixed concentration; (b) responses of one senor to all the used oil concentrations
3. Signal processing and results
In electronic nose application usually a set of selected features, which depend to the measurement
protocol, are studied in term of their performance to classify the used substances. To obtain an accurate
classification, the selection of the features and their processing are very important. In this study, we have
selected principally two traditional features from the time-dependent signal, as the response amplitude
named Vs-V
0
(where Vs is the final value of the sensor response and V
0
its initial value), and the slope of
the dynamic phase calculated during the first three minutes of the gas exposition (named Slope). We have
observed that the transient part of the sensor response presents significant evolution in the two cases
54 M. Siadat et al. / Procedia Engineering 47 ( 2012 ) 52 – 55
described on the figure 1a (signal response of all sensors at a fixed atmosphere) and 1b (signal response
of one sensor to all the studied concentrations). So, we have selected one new feature corresponding to
the maximum value (called Peak) of the signal response derivative curve. This maximum appears for all
the sensors in the first minutes of the gas exposition.
For the calculation of this Peak feature, the time-response was first filtered to eliminate signal noises,
and then derivated. Several digital filters were tested to optimize the type and the characteristic
parameters of the filter to be unique for each sensor and all the exposures. Butterworth type filtering has
given the best results. For each sensor, the Peak values show an appreciable variation along with the all
oil concentrations (Figure 2).
Fig. 2. (a) Example of a derivative curve without filtering; (b) Derivative curve of SP-MW0 for all the used pine oil concentrations
The three selected features are tested for their capacity to differentiate the oil concentrations. In Figure
3 we present the evolution of the Vs-V
0
and the Peak features along with the oil concentrations and for all
the sensors. So, to take into account all these informations, the values of each extracted feature must be
assembled in a data basis and then treated by classification methods.
Fig. 3. Evolution of two selected features along with the pine oil concentrations: (a) Vs-V
0
; (b) Peak
The capacity of each feature to classify the pine EO concentrations was studied using first the Principal
Component Analysis (PCA). This non-supervised statistical method permits us to represent all the
observations of a multidimensional data basis in a reduced dimension. Figure 4 presents the PCA results
obtained with each selected feature taken separately. In the case of the Slope values the 3, 4, 5 and 6%
concentration groups are overlapped and not differentiable. With the Vs-V
0
values the group of 4, 5 and
6% concentrations are very closed and difficult to be distinguished. By using the Peak feature, we obtain
55
M. Siadat et al. / Procedia Engineering 47 ( 2012 ) 52 – 55
a better classification and only the group 4 and 5% are closed. We can then conclude that the new feature
Peak is more accurate than the classical features for our application. In addition the Peak is less dependent
on the sensor drift (derivation) and it is obtained faster than the other ones. To confirm this finding, the
discrimination power of each feature is tested using the supervised Linear Discriminant Analysis. The
concentration identification is validated by cross validation technique: a success rate of 95.2% is obtained
with the Slope, 99.2% with the Vs-V
0
and 100% when using the Peak feature.
Fig. 4. PCA diagrams obtained with each feature taken separately: (a) Slope; (b) Vs-Vo; (c) Peak
4. Conclusion
We have defined a new feature and highlighted its capacity for a rapid and accurate identification of
odor concentrations, comparing to the results obtained from the traditional features used in metal oxide
senor response processing. However, the determination of this parameter, deduced from the derivative
curve of the time response of the sensors, needs accurate measurement system and adequate signal
filtering. This data processing can be easily implemented to the intelligent system like electronic nose.
References
[1] T. Eklov, P. Materson, I. Lundstrom. Selection of variables for interpreting multivariate gas sensor data. Analytica Chimica
Acta; 381(1999) 221-232
[2] O. Gualdron, E. Llobet, J. Brezmes, X. Vilanova, X. Correig. Fast variable selection for gas sensing applications IEEE
sensors; (2004) 892-895
[3] H. Sambemana, M. Siadat, M. Lumbreras. Gas sensing evaluation for the quantification of natural oil diffusion. Chemical
Engineering Transaction;, 23 (2010) 177-183