Chevret S, for the CI. Effects of Fluid Resuscitation With Colloids vs Crystalloids on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Presenting With Hypovolemic Shock: The CRISTAL Randomized Trial

Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches, France.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 35.29). 10/2013; DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280502
Source: PubMed


Evidence supporting the choice of intravenous colloid vs crystalloid solutions for management of hypovolemic shock remains unclear.Objective
To test whether use of colloids compared with crystalloids for fluid resuscitation alters mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with hypovolemic shock.Design, Setting, and Participants
A multicenter, randomized clinical trial stratified by case mix (sepsis, trauma, or hypovolemic shock without sepsis or trauma). Therapy in the Colloids Versus Crystalloids for the Resuscitation of the Critically Ill (CRISTAL) trial was open label but outcome assessment was blinded to treatment assignment. Recruitment began in February 2003 and ended in August 2012 of 2857 sequential ICU patients treated at 57 ICUs in France, Belgium, North Africa, and Canada; follow-up ended in November 2012.Interventions
Colloids (n = 1414; gelatins, dextrans, hydroxyethyl starches, or 4% or 20% of albumin) or crystalloids (n = 1443; isotonic or hypertonic saline or Ringer lactate solution) for all fluid interventions other than fluid maintenance throughout the ICU stay.Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary outcome was death within 28 days. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality; and days alive and not receiving renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, or vasopressor therapy.Results
Within 28 days, there were 359 deaths (25.4%) in colloids group vs 390 deaths (27.0%) in crystalloids group (relative risk [RR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.04]; P = .26). Within 90 days, there were 434 deaths (30.7%) in colloids group vs 493 deaths (34.2%) in crystalloids group (RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86 to 0.99]; P = .03). Renal replacement therapy was used in 156 (11.0%) in colloids group vs 181 (12.5%) in crystalloids group (RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.03]; P = .19). There were more days alive without mechanical ventilation in the colloids group vs the crystalloids group by 7 days (mean: 2.1 vs 1.8 days, respectively; mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.48] days; P = .01) and by 28 days (mean: 14.6 vs 13.5 days; mean difference, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.14 to 2.06] days; P = .01) and alive without vasopressor therapy by 7 days (mean: 5.0 vs 4.7 days; mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, −0.03 to 0.50] days; P = .04) and by 28 days (mean: 16.2 vs 15.2 days; mean difference, 1.04 [95% CI, −0.04 to 2.10] days; P = .03).Conclusions and Relevance
Among ICU patients with hypovolemia, the use of colloids vs crystalloids did not result in a significant difference in 28-day mortality. Although 90-day mortality was lower among patients receiving colloids, this finding should be considered exploratory and requires further study before reaching conclusions about efficacy.Trial Registration Identifier: NCT00318942

Download full-text


Available from: Fekri Abroug
  • Source
    • "More broadly, initial studies pointed to potential benefits of goal-directed fluid resuscitation early in severe sepsis [14], whereas later aggressive fluid administration during established critical illness appears to be harmful [44-46]. Differences in the time of entry into clinical trials of fluid resuscitation may also explain differing messages about potential harm from colloids used for volume expansion [13,47]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major surgery and critical illnesses such as sepsis and trauma all disturb normal physiological fluid handling. Intravenous fluid therapy for resuscitation and fluid maintenance is a central part of medical care during these conditions, yet the evidence base supporting practice in this area lacks answers to a number of important questions. Recent research developments include a refinement of our knowledge of the endothelial barrier structure and function and a focus on the potential harm that may be associated with intravenous fluid therapy. Here, we briefly describe the contemporary view of fluid physiology and how this may be disrupted by pathological processes. The important themes in critical illness fluid research are discussed, with a particular focus on two emerging ideas: firstly, that individualising fluid treatment to the patient, their underlying disease state and the phase of that illness may be key to improving clinical outcomes using fluid interventions and, secondly, that fluids should be considered to be drugs, with specific indications and contraindications, dose ranges and potential toxicities.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014
  • Source
    • "To adequately power a trial to investigate any possible intraoperative harm from HES would need an exceptionally large trial and is unlikely to ever occur. By contrast, the recent publication of the Colloids Versus Crystalloids for the Resuscitation of the Critically Ill (CRISTAL) trial, an open-label (clinicians were not blinded to the study fluid) randomized comparison of crystalloids against colloids early during the resuscitation phase of critical illness (i.e., among hypovolemic patients), has suggested a possible benefit for colloids [78]. Similarly, in an animal model, when hemorrhagic shock was induced by the removal of sufficient quantities of blood to obtain and sustain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 mmHg, restoration of MAP was four times faster with HES than LR (p < 0.001) and required fourfold less volume (p ¼ 0.04) [71]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The underlying principles guiding fluid management in any setting are very simple: maintain central euvolemia, and avoid salt and water excess. However these principles are frequently easier to state than to achieve. Evidence from recent literature suggests that avoidance of fluid excess is important, with excessive crystalloid use leading to perioperative weight gain and an increase in complications. A zero balance approach aimed at avoiding fluid excess is recommended for all patients. For major surgery, there is a sizeable body of evidence that an individualized goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) improves outcomes. However within an Enhanced Recovery program only a few studies have been published yet so far GDFT has not achieved the same benefit. Balanced crystalloids are recommended for most patients. The use of colloids remains controversial; however current evidence suggests they can be beneficial in intraoperative patients with objective evidence of hypovolemia.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Baillière&#x27 s Best Practice and Research in Clinical Anaesthesiology
  • Source
    • "This recommendation is based on the results of the VISEP5, CRYSTMAS6, 6S7, and CHEST8 trials. The results of the recently completed CRYSTAL trial9 were not considered. CRYSTAL trial results were reviewed separately. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Severe sepsis is the most common cause of death among critically ill patients in non-coronary intensive care units. In 2002, the guideline titled "Surviving Sepsis Campaign" was published by American and European Critical Care Medicine to decrease the mortality of severe sepsis and septic shock patients, which has been the basis of the treatment for those patients. After the first revised guidelines were published on 2008, the most current version was published in 2013 based on the updated literature of until fall 2012. Other important revised guidelines in critical care field such as 'Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit' were revised in 2013. This article will review the revised guidelines and several additional interesting published papers of until March 2014, including the part of ventilator-induced lung injury and the preventive strategies.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014 · Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
Show more