Content uploaded by Kimmo Saarinen
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kimmo Saarinen on Jan 20, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
1 23
Aerobiologia
International Journal of Aerobiology -
including the online journal `Physical
Aerobiology'
ISSN 0393-5965
Volume 27
Number 4
Aerobiologia (2011) 27:339-343
DOI 10.1007/s10453-011-9200-8
Pollen transport by clothes
Juha Jantunen & Kimmo Saarinen
1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and
all rights are held exclusively by Springer
Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint
is for personal use only and shall not be self-
archived in electronic repositories. If you
wish to self-archive your work, please use the
accepted author’s version for posting to your
own website or your institution’s repository.
You may further deposit the accepted author’s
version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s
request, provided it is not made publicly
available until 12 months after publication.
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Pollen transport by clothes
Juha Jantunen •Kimmo Saarinen
Received: 21 October 2010 / Accepted: 1 February 2011 / Published online: 16 February 2011
ÓSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
Abstract Pollen transport into houses via clothing
was studied on different types of fabrics after clothing
was aired or worn outdoors. After walking through
grassland, 68 pollen grains/cm
2
were found on
clothes (tape samples). The amount of grass pollen,
and especially pollen from insect-pollinated plants,
increased from the shirt towards the shoes. The
amount of pollen on clothes aired outdoors in a yard
depended on the concentration in the ambient air and
the texture of the fabrics. On vacuumed samples, 1.2
grains/cm
2
/h adhered to the furry fabric of fleece and
wool, whereas only 0.3 grains/cm
2
/h adhered to a
tight weave polyamide coat and a denim jacket. A
moist cotton shirt gave slightly higher pollen counts
in both the tape (8.6 grains/cm
2
/h) and the vacuumed
samples (1.0 grains/cm
2
/h) compared to a dry shirt
(5.6 and 0.6 grains/cm
2
/h), but the difference was not
significant. Tape samples gave tenfold higher pollen
numbers compared to vacuumed samples, probably
due to the more optimal location of the tape sampling
area on top of the shoulders. We conclude that
clothing constitutes an important route for carrying
allergenic pollen into houses. Pollen transport can be
decreased by shaking outdoor clothing before enter-
ing a residence. In our case, shaking removed 68%
pollen grains from trousers.
Keywords Betula Fabric Indoor exposure
Pinus sylvestris Pollen
1 Introduction
Indoor air quality is important to human health
because people spend most of their time indoors. For
allergic people, indoor exposure to pollen and fungal
spores is of particular concern. Large amounts of
pollen have been found inside houses and public
buildings (D’Amato et al. 1996; Enomoto et al. 2004;
Takahashi et al. 2008, Tormo-Molino et al. 2009).
Pollen can float into a house through open windows,
doors and unfiltered ventilation systems. In a recent
study, the amount of airborne pollen indoors was
dependent on the measuring distance from ventilation
openings, the outdoor concentration and the rate of
the incoming airflow indoors (Jantunen and Saarinen
2009). With increased airflow from two open win-
dows on opposite walls of a room, a high number of
pollen grains penetrated deeply into the house.
Pollen can also be carried in on the feet and bodies
of people and pets (Ishibashi et al. 2008; Vural and
Ince 2008). It is often suggested that clothes consti-
tute an important entry route. Yet pollen has been
searched for and counted on fabrics in only a few
studies (Kiyosawa and Yoshizawa 2002; Zavada
et al. 2007; Takahashi et al. 2008). We evaluated
the importance of clothes on pollen transport into
houses by studying different types of fabrics after the
J. Jantunen (&)K. Saarinen
South Karelia Allergy and Environment Institute,
La
¨a
¨ka
¨ritie 15, 55330 Tiuruniemi, Finland
e-mail: jjantune@nic.fi
123
Aerobiologia (2011) 27:339–343
DOI 10.1007/s10453-011-9200-8
Author's personal copy
clothes had been aired or worn outdoors. The main
objectives were to determine (1) how much pollen
may adhere to fabrics from the air and directly from
the inflorescences of plants, (2) what is the impor-
tance of different types of fabrics in regard to the
amount of pollen trapped on the clothes and (3) how
much pollen can be removed from clothes by shaking
the fabric.
2 Materials and methods
The pollen on clothes was studied in Lappeenranta,
SE Finland. Two types of sampling protocols were
carried out.
(1) Pollen adhering to clothes directly from plants
was studied in the middle of the hay pollen season on
2.7.2008. After walking through grassland (500 m), a
total of 23 pollen samples on clothes were collected
using tape. Samples were taken from four different
trousers at knee height at both the front and the back
of the trouser leg and also before and after shaking
and beating the fabric thoroughly by hand. At the
same time, pollen samples were taken from two
different jogging shoes, two pairs of socks and three
t-shirts. The tape was pressed against the fabric five
times before being placed on a glass slide. Pollen
counts were converted into grains/cm
2
using a
multiplication factor of 0.85 (5 9searched slide area
(2 91.9 cm 90.0622 cm))
-1
.
(2) Airborne pollen adhering to textiles was
studied in a yard for 7 days in the birch pollen
season (4.5.2009–15.5.2009) and on 2 days in the
pine pollen season (1.6.2009 and 9.6.2009). Seven
different fabric types, comprising a polyamide coat,
denim jacket, dry and moist cotton shirt, woollen
sweater, fleece sweater and terry towel, were hung
out in a yard surrounded by mixed forest dominated
by birches and pines. After airing for 3–5 h (starting
at 10–11 a.m.), the fabrics were carried inside for
pollen sampling. First, we took tape samples from the
top of the shoulders according to the previous part of
the study. The second, samples were vacuumed on to
glass microfiber filters (Whatman GF/A) on the
vertical and the top area of the shoulders
(40 cm 960 cm). A piece from the edge to the
centre was cut from the filters and placed on a glass
slide. Pollen was counted using a microscope after
the filters were made transparent with immersion oil.
Pollen counts from 2 to 3 transects from edge to
centre (2.5 cm) were converted into grains/cm
2
using
a multiplication factor of 0.065 ((filter area) 9(-
searched slide area)
-1
9(vacuumed area)
-1
).
Pollen counts on clothes were compared to birch and
pine pollen concentrations in the ambient air measured
in the same yard at a height of 5 m using rotorod-type
impaction samplers, 3–5 air samples being collected
during the measuring day. The mean values of pollen
collected at two ends of the U-shaped rods were used
for analysis. Pollen data were converted into concen-
tration values (grains/m
3
) using a multiplication
factor of 0.80 (rod width (0.0019 m) 9rod height
(0.019 m) 9head diameter (0.08 m) 9p9RPM
(2,300) 9time rod used (60 min))
-1
.
Pollen counts before and after shaking the trousers
were compared using Wilcoxon’s nonparametric
paired test. Spearman’s correlation test was used to
determine a possible relationship between the pollen
counts on the fabrics and the pollen concentration in
the ambient air. The amount of pollen adhering to the
fabrics from the air was compared using a Friedman’s
statistical test for nonparametric repeated measures
including a Conover’s post hoc test.
3 Results
Considerable amounts of pollen adhered to clothes in
direct contact with vegetation. After the walk through
the grassland, 12–230 pollen grains/cm
2
were
counted on clothes (mean 68 grains/cm
2
). The
amount of grass pollen, and especially that of
insect-pollinated plants, increased from the shirts
towards the shoes (Fig. 1). On average, the front of
the trousers acquired 64 grass pollen grains/cm
2
(SD
27) and the back 38 grains/cm
2
(SD 18). According to
these results, the total amount of grass pollen on the
trousers was close to 150,000. Pollen concentrations
decreased by 68% after shaking (from 86 to
21 grains/cm
2
;P=0.025).
Airborne tree pollen adhered to the clothes as well.
The amount of pollen on clothes aired in a yard
depended on the concentration in the ambient air and
the texture of the fabric. The mean number of pollen
grains on tape samples varied between 0.5 and
2.4 pollen grains/cm
2
/h when the concentration in
the air was less than 700 grains/m
3
. With concentra-
tions of over 1,500 grains/m
3
, the pollen counts were
340 Aerobiologia (2011) 27:339–343
123
Author's personal copy
7.6–14.6 grains/cm
2
/h. The highest total number of
pollen grains on a single day was 143 grains/cm
2
on a
moist shirt (1.6.2009). The amount of pollen on
vacuumed samples was lower but the counts from
cotton (r
S
=0.92, P\0.001), tight weave fabrics
(r
S
=0.90, P\0.001) and furry fabrics (r
S
=0.88,
P\0.01) had a strong positive correlation with the
pollen concentration in the ambient air (Fig. 2).
On the vacuumed samples, the amount of pollen
on clothes decreased towards the tighter weave
fabrics (Fig. 3). More pollen adhered to the furry,
loosely woven fabric of fleece and wool (mean
1.2 grains/cm
2
/h) compared to the polyamide coat
and the denim jacket (0.3 grains/cm
2
/h). The
highest single day counts were measured on towel
(1.6.2009; 26.7 grains/cm
2
) and on wool (13.5.2009;
16.0 grains/cm
2
).
The results from the pollen counts determined
from the tape samples were inconsistent compared to
the texture of the fabrics (Table 1). For example, the
average amount of pollen on the woollen sweater
(mean 3.8 grains/cm
2
/h) and the towel (4.0 grains/
cm
2
/h) was slightly lower than on the polyamide coat
(6.5 grains/cm
2
/h), probably due to pollen submerged
beyond reach of the tape on the uneven surface of the
fabric. The moist cotton shirt gave slightly higher
pollen counts on both the tape (8.6 grains/cm
2
/h) and
the vacuumed samples (1.0 grains/cm
2
/h) compared
to the dry shirt (5.6 and 0.6 grains/cm
2
/h), but the
difference was not significant.
4 Discussion
Large numbers of pollen grains were found on fabrics,
both after walking through grassland and after airing
the clothes. The highest pollen levels were found on
shoes, this possibly being the result of several days’
accumulation of pollen on unclean fabric. Socks also
carried some of the highest pollen loads, indicating that
more pollen adhered to fabric in direct contact with
plants. Pollen from the air became trapped in t-shirts,
and the inflorescences of the tallest hay plants in the
grassland being unable to reach the height of the shirt.
The pollen load on t-shirts after walking (tape:
12–63 grains/cm
2
) was fairly comparable with that on
t-shirts after airing for 3–5 h (tape: 3–71 grains/cm
2
).
The type of fabric and the pollen concentration in
the ambient air had a significant effect on the amount of
pollen trapped on clothes. A furry or grainy surface–
collected pollen loads three times higher than the flatter
fabric. The difference between towel and t-shirts (1.7
fold) was about the same, as observed by Takahashi
et al. (2008) with Japanese cedar pollen (1.9-fold).
After clothing was aired, the tape samples resulted
in tenfold higher pollen numbers compared to the
vacuumed samples. The difference was most likely
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
t-shirt trousers socks shoes
other pollen
grass pollen
pg/cm
2
n=3 n=8 n=2 n=2
Fig. 1 The amount of pollen grains on clothes after walking
through grassland (500 m). Other pollen included Rumex,
Galium, Asteraceae, Apiaceae and small amounts of Caryo-
phyllaceae, Luzula,Campanula, Urtica and Pinus pollen
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
tight weave fabric
cotton shirt
furry fabric
pg /m
3
pg /cm
2
/h
Fig. 2 The amount of pollen on different types of clothes after
airing out in a yard during the Betula and Pinus pollen season.
Tight weave fabrics included polyamide coat and denim jacket,
and furry fabrics were terry towel, wool and fleece and cotton
included dry and moist shirts
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
polyamide
coat
denim
jacket
cotton
(dry)
cotton
(moist)
terry
towel
woollen
sweater
fleece
sweater
pg/cm2/h
abc
defg
d,f,g f,g g a a,b a,
b,e
g
Friedman's test
p=0.002
Fig. 3 The mean number of pollen grains on different types of
fabric after airing in a yard during the Betula and Pinus pollen
season. Letters indicate the differences between fabric types
(Friedman’s test, including Conover’s post hoc test)
Aerobiologia (2011) 27:339–343 341
123
Author's personal copy
methodological. Tape samples were taken first from
optimal locations on the top of the shoulders. Pollen
adhering to tape decreased the amount of pollen
remaining for vacuuming and in addition, the larger
vacuumed area also covered the less optimal vertical
surface of the clothes. Tape sampling is a simple
method of collecting pollen on clothes used in, for
example, forensic palynology (Flinn 1992; Wu et al.
2006). However, the texture of the fabrics revealed
the weakness of tape sampling from the quantitative
analysis standpoint. In contrast to the vacuumed
samples, less pollen adhered to tape on wool and terry
towel, probably because more pollen grains were out
of reach of the tape on the rough surfaced fabrics
compared to flat and tight weaved fabrics.
The highest pollen numbers were 340,000 pollen
grains on the shoulders of a moist shirt (tape
samples), 60,000 pollen grains on a terry towel
(vacuumed samples) and 150,000 pollen grains on
trousers after walking through grassland (tape sam-
ples). The actual numbers of pollen on clothes can be
considerably higher. Takahashi et al. (2008) counted
2–3 million pollen grains on laundry, and Zavada
et al. (2007) estimated that a large t-shirt can trap 7
million grains during a peak pollen day. These
studies, however, were carried out using a different
collection method that often leads to quantitative
differences (Frenz 1999; Piotrowska and Weryszko-
Chmielewska 2003). Pollen concentrations in the air,
local weather conditions and separate pollen produc-
ing plant species in different geographical locations
may also have an effect on the results (Giner et al.
1999; Trigo et al. 2000; Valencia-Barrera et al. 2002).
We can conclude that clothes constitute an
important route for pollen entering houses. In accor-
dance with Kiyosawa and Yoshizawa (2002) and
Takahashi et al. (2008), we were able to demonstrate
that more than half of the pollen trapped on clothes
can be removed by shaking. Although most of the
detached pollen falls to the floor in stationary indoor
air, allergic people are encouraged to shake or brush
outdoor clothing outside before entering their resi-
dences. During the peak pollen season, these clothes
should preferably be stored in a porch, outside
entrance or other place which is separated in some
way from the rooms where people spend most of their
time. Laundry should not be dried outdoors because
moist fabric may collect even more pollen than a dry
one. In addition, pollen clings to our skin and hair, as
also to pet fur. In our experimental vacuumed
samples on a dog that spent most of its day outdoors,
there were 220–240 pollen grains/cm
2
during the
Betula pollen season. As well as outdoor clothing,
pets should also be kept out of the bedroom.
Acknowledgments The study was financially supported by
the South Karelia Regional Fund of the Finnish Cultural
Foundation.
References
D’Amato, G., Liccardi, G., Saggese, M., Mistrello, G.,
D’Amato, M., & Falagiani, P. (1996). Comparison
between outdoor and indoor airborne allergenic activity.
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 77, 147–152.
Enomoto, T., Onishi, S., Sogo, H., Dake, Y., Ikeda, H., Fu-
nakoshi, H., et al. (2004). Japanese cedar pollen in floating
Table 1 Daily pollen counts on vacuumed and tape samples (pg/cm
2
/h) collected from clothes after airing out them in a yard during
the Betula (4.5.2009–15.5.2009) and Pinus (1.6.2009–9.6.2009) pollen season
Sampling day in 2009 4.5.2009 5.5.2009 8.5.2009 10.5.2009 12.5.2009 13.5.2009 15.5.2009 1.6.2009 9.6.2009
Pollen in ambient air (pg/m
3
) 109 424 610 193 235 1,780 130 3,790 2,350
Vacuumed samples from shoulders (40 cm 960 cm)
Tight weave fabric 0.03 0.07 0.24 0.17 0.22 0.40 0.13 0.83 0.64
Cotton shirt 0.17 0.34 0.41 0.24 0.16 0.65 0.13 2.44 2.00
Furry fabric 0.10 0.14 0.83 0.42 0.73 2.80 0.22 3.05 2.04
Tape samples from top of the shoulders
Tight weave fabric – 2.7 2.9 1.6 2.1 7.6 0.5 11.1 17.0
Cotton shirt – 2.4 1.3 1.9 1.4 7.9 0.5 19.2 15.7
Furry fabric – 2.3 1.7 3.4 1.7 7.4 0.6 10.4 12.2
Tight weave fabrics included polyamide coat and denim jacket, and furry fabrics were terry towel, wool and fleece and cotton
included dry and moist shirts
342 Aerobiologia (2011) 27:339–343
123
Author's personal copy
indoor house dust after pollinating season. Allergology
International, 53, 279–285.
Flinn, L. (1992). Collection of fiber evidence using a roller
device and adhesive lifts. Journal of Forensic Sciences,
37, 106–112.
Frenz, D. A. (1999). Comparing pollen and spore counts col-
lected with the rotorod sampler and burkard spore trap.
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 83, 341–349.
Giner, M. M., Garcı
´a, J. S. C., & Selle
´s, J. G. (1999). Aero-
biology of Artemisia airborne pollen in Murcia (SE Spain)
and its relationship with weather variables: annual and
intradiurnal variations for three different species. Wind
vectors as a tool in determining pollen origin. Interna-
tional Journal of Biometeorology, 43, 51–63.
Ishibashi, Y., Ohno, H., Oh-ishi, S., Matsuoka, T., Kizaki, T.,
& Yoshizumi, K. (2008). Characterization of pollen dis-
persion in the neighbourhood of Tokyo, Japan in spring of
2005 and 2006. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 5, 76–85.
Jantunen, J., & Saarinen, K. (2009). Intrusion of airborne
pollen through open windows and doors. Aerobiologia,
25, 193–201.
Kiyosawa, H., & Yoshizawa, S. (2002). Brought-in pollen into
indoor environment by residents’ activities. Study on the
control of indoor pollen exposure. Part 2. Journal of
Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering,
558, 37–42. (In Japanese, abstract in English).
Piotrowska, K., & Weryszko-Chmielewska, E. (2003). Pollen
count of selected taxa in the atmosphere of lublin using
two monitoring methods. Annals of Agricultural and
Environmental Medicine, 10, 79–85.
Takahashi, Y., Takano, K., Suzuki, M., Nagai, S., Yokosuka,
M., Takeshita, T., et al. (2008). Two routes for pollen
entering indoors: ventilation and clothes. Journal of
Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology, 18,
382–388.
Tormo-Molino, R., Gonzalo-Carijo, A., Silva-Palacios, I., &
Fernandez-Rodriquez, S. (2009). Seasonal and spatial
variations of indoor pollen in a hospital. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6,
3169–3178.
Trigo, M. D. M., Torro, F. J., Recio, M., & Cabezudo, B.
(2000). A statistical approach to comparing the results
from different aerobiological stations. Grana, 39,
252–258.
Valencia-Barrera, R. M., Comtois, P., & Ferna
´ndez-Gonza
´lez,
D. (2002). Bioclimatic indices as a tool in pollen fore-
casting. International Journal of Biometeorology, 46,
171–175.
Vural, C., & Ince, A. (2008). Pollen grains in the house dust of
Kayseri, Turkey. International Journal of Natural and
Engineering Sciences, 2, 41–44.
Wu, C.-L., Yang, C.-H., Huang, T.-C., & Chen, S.-H. (2006).
Forensic pollen evidence from clothes by tape adhesive
method. Taiwania, 51, 123–130.
Zavada, M. S., McGraw, S. M., & Miller, M. A. (2007). The
role of clothing fabrics as passive pollen collectors in the
north-eastern United States. Grana, 46, 285–291.
Aerobiologia (2011) 27:339–343 343
123
Author's personal copy