ArticlePDF Available

Chasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and the Portability of Performance Chasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and the Portability of Performance; by Boris Groysberg; May 2010; Princeton University Press; pp. 446; price: Rs 1094.

Authors:
BOOK REVIEW
Chasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and the Portability of
Performance; by Boris Groysberg; May 2010; Princeton
University Press; pp. 446; price: Rs 1094.
Boris Groysberg, an Associate Professor at Harvard Business
School, in Chasing Stars: d The Myth of Talent and the
Portability of Performance has tried to determine if star
employees can take their skills along with them when they
move out, either to a competing firm, or to another industry or
to doing something on their own. The findings in this book,
together with well-analysed data dispel some myths and give
us a new view on talent and its portability. The author studied
the performance of 1000 star Wall Street analysts from 78
different firms.
In part one, Groysberg hypothesises that the analyst’s
firm plays a significant part in the performance of the
analyst. These findings can have wide ranging interpreta-
tions from how much firms should invest in human capital to
how much they should invest in technology. The author
further asserts that by determining if Wall Street analyst
skills are indeed portable, it is possible to extrapolate those
results to other knowledge based industries as well.
While there are firms that do not take a clear stand on
portability, not having either an elaborate analyst training
programme or clear cut spending on technologies that help
analysts perform better, most firms that house the best
analysts have a view. They either take enormous pains to
help their analysts gain the skills they need and create
strong networks around them (junior analysts, sales reps,
retail brokers, asset managers, traders etc) or they prefer
to le t them loose and not spend too much money other
than compensation. In the former case the analyst is lik ely
to develop firm specifi c human capital skills that ca n be
used only within the existing system. In the latter case the
analyst is likely to develop general human capital skills,
which are more portable. Groysb erg’s research has shown
that when an analyst leaves a firm, the probabil ity of
attaining a rank in t he Institutional Investor
1
dips. While
firm specific human capital can be used to explain this
difference ther e are some other factors that merit at ten-
tion. The chances of achieving a rank, though lowered, did
not decre ase as much when the analyst moved to
a comparable firm (firms with similar capabilities). In fa ct
analysts who move d to better firms ‘experien ced no
decline in either short term or long term performance
compared to that of star analysts who stayed’. Moving to
firms that had lower capabilities was the worst ki nd of
move.
Groysberg also establishes that the ori entation of the
analyst’s original firm makes a difference. Analysts who
left rms that pro moted portability such as Credit Suisse
Firs t Boston and Salomon Brothers suffered least decline in
performance. Those from firms su ch as Merrill Lynch and
Gold man Sachs suffered strongest dips as these firms
invested heavily in firm specific human capital, had elab-
orate training programmes and ensured that analysts
always fit the culture. Groysberg’s research also reveals
that when star analysts left along with their teams, they
expe rienced almost no decline in performanc e. Are stars
worth the time and money? Groysbe rg’s research shows
that organisations that acquire stars suffer a small decline
in their share pric e. Investors believed that such acquisi-
tions destroy value.
The second part of the book investigates human
resource (HR) practices in firms that cultivate and hire
stars. While explaining and analysing non portability
Groysberg divides it into soft and hard non portability. Soft
non portability, promoted by firms such as Goldman Sachs
which ‘excelled at integrating its employees into a web of
soft practices and procedures unmatched at other firms’, is
looked at in detail as is hard non portability which includes
proprietary IT systems and products.
Firms hire stars either to explore a sector or to exploit
a sector. In the former case stars need to set up a ‘practice’
while in the latter they need to expand what is an already
established practice perhaps in need of an overhaul. In
either case assimilating a star is not easy. Groysberg’s
investigations reveal that firms that were very good at
integrating stars ‘had deeply thought about both hiring and
assimilation and had drawn up systematic plans to guide
both processes’.
Groysberg then tackles the not well-explored aspect of
whole teams of analysts moving. In his study, the author
found that such team moves, often called ‘liftouts’, are not
uncommon. The successful liftout, seemingly like
a successful acquisition, consists of a courtship stage, fol-
lowed by integration of top management, then integration
of work processes and finally a full cultural integration.
Women who consisted of 18% of Groysberg’s sample did not
experience any significant decline in performance. Since
women can rarely be part of traditionally male bonding
1
Published since 1972, Institutional Investor (II) tracks the
performance of analysts and ranks them. These rankings are used
to support practices in hiring, bonus rollouts etc. by organisations.
Peer-review under responsibility of Indian Institute of Management
Bangalore.
Production and hosting by Elsevier
available at www.sciencedirect.com
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/iimb
Production and hosting by Elsevier
IIMB Management Review (2012) 24, 116e117
0970-3896
doi:10.1016/j.iimb.2012.03.001
opportunities they strengthen relationships with outsiders,
institutional investors, top management from the companies
they cover, other analysts and the media. This gives them
general skills, which they take with them when they move.
Since these skills can be used elsewhere, star women analysts
were able to ensure that their performance did not dip. This
research has profound implications in the workplace.
In part three of the book, Groysberg begins by studying
culture in organisations. While most organisations preferred
hiring stars to training and developing them, ‘firms with
developmental cultures were far more successful at both
producing and retaining stars’. The author also examines
turnover and factors that cause it. Again Groysberg’s
research shatters some earlier held assumptions. Stars who
were previously assumed to be more mobile and more free
agent like were less likely to leave being surrounded by
a developmental culture. While compensation and firm
performance were important, factors such as department
performance and strength, leadership and quality of
teammates played a part in retention of stars. This goes to
show that even in a profession that is perceived to be
individualistic, soft factors like culture and teams matter.
The penultimate chapter deals with the measurement
and rewarding of performance. Predictably there is no one-
way to monitor analyst performance and thereby no unique
way to reward performance either. Successful firms use
mostly objective criteria and clearly demarcate between
results and activity, choosing to reward the former.
The findings in the book have many applications in the
field of work. The book points out that we often look at the
phenomenon of portability through stereotypical lenses,
and are prone to the first impression error
2
and the halo
effect
3
and our mistaken assumptions about ourselves. If
you are a star employee looking for a change, the author’s
advice includesddon’t leave for money, do enough
research, don’t overestimate yourself and lastly, think long
term.
Groysberg’s portability studies also might have implica-
tions in many Indian organisations, particularly conglom-
erates or federations such as Mahindra and Mahindra,
Aditya Birla Group and the Tata Group. All three have
a history of transferring and moving managers from one unit
to another. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to study how
these moves have transpired both for the organisation and
the individual. This could also entail studying how individ-
uals move between cultures (those of each unit or
company) while remaining in a seamless culture (that of the
brand, parent or holding company). The book could give
a strong impetus to research in HR. The reader can take
away a lesson or two from how some of the most profitable
firms in the world view and sustain performance. This is
a book that must not remain only in libraries of business
schools, but in the hands of those who drive performance
either directly or indirectly.
R.V. Anand
IIM Bangalore, India
Tel.: þ91 9900388553.
E-mail address: anand.rv@iimb.ernet.in
2
Our judgments about people are very often based on what we
see them doing when we first see them and these are wrong in
many instances.
3
When we assume that a person can be good at everything
based on how good the person is at one activity.
Book Review 117
... This reputational effect may in turn strengthen the demand for the analyst's research reports, thereby increasing the value they create for their brokerage house. 2 For example, Bonner et al. (2007) examine the effects of analysts' media coverage on investor reactions to analysts' earnings forecast revisions and find that investors respond more strongly to forecast revisions issued by analysts who have received greater coverage in the media. Publicity may also help analysts earn votes to become an Institutional Investor (II) All-Star analyst, a generally accepted measure of the success and prestige of sell-side analysts (Groysberg 2010, Cliff and Denis 2004, Hong and Kubik 2003, Krigman et al. 2001). 3 Extant research has identified All-Star status as the single most significant determinant of an analyst's compensation (Groysberg et al. 2011, Stickel 1992). ...
Article
This study examines the determinants of financial analyst coverage in the business press and the effects of such coverage on analysts’ careers. Using a unique database of business press articles that quote a financial analyst, we compare each cited analyst with the other analysts who were actively following the firm and could have been cited by the reporter, but were not. In general, we find that analysts quoted in the business press are more likely to possess characteristics that are positively associated with analyst quality relative to other analysts covering the same firms. This result suggests business press coverage can serve as a useful heuristic to help investors identify high-quality analysts. Moreover, after controlling for analyst quality and in a propensity-score matched sample, we find that analysts with unfavorable recommendations for the firms discussed in the business press are more likely to be cited than analysts with favorable recommendations. We also document significant future career benefits for analysts who receive publicity in the business press, which suggests that the business press is a source of valuable exposure for analysts.
Article
Economists have argued that employers sometimes pay above-market premiums (efficiency wages) in order to attract, motivate, and/or retain valued personnel. Drawing on recent work examining reciprocity and gift exchange, this paper proposes the notion of “empathy wages,” in which the effect of the premium paid depends on the extent to which it elicits gratitude from recipients. We argue that a particular gift (monetary or otherwise) offered by an employer is likely to elicit more gratitude among “non-stars”: workers who are relatively disadvantaged and in the lower part of the performance distribution. In contrast to “stars,” “non-stars” are likely to compare the treatment they receive to the inferior opportunities or treatment they (might) have received outside of their present employment situation. Star workers, in contrast, are likely to believe that they are worth whatever they can command. The economic viability of such “empathy wages” thus depends on how much star versus non-star workers vary in gratitude, relative to how they differ in output and compensation. We explore a variety of data bearing on how much stars differ from non-stars in their respective output and earnings (in star contexts such as professional sports and real estate sales). We then review or reanalyze some prior studies on gift exchange, documenting that those who are relatively disadvantaged and/or low performers do appear more grateful (or inclined to reciprocate gifts) than stars. Indeed, the magnitude of the difference is sufficiently large that it could offset quite marked differences in productivity or quite small differences in compensation (both of which would make stars relatively more attractive to employers). We suggest some conditions under which gratitude-based employment systems are more likely to flourish in real-world settings, as well as some fruitful lines for future research on these topics.
Article
One key driver of improvement in surgical outcomes is a surgeon’s prior experience. However, research notes that not all experience provides equal value for performance. How then should surgeons accumulate experience to improve quality outcomes? In this paper we investigate the differential effects of focal and related (i.e., tasks similar to, but not identical to, the focal task) experience. We open up the black box of the volume-outcome relationship by going beyond just dividing experience into focal and related categories, but also considering how sub-tasks, and context (i.e., the organization in which the work takes place) affect performance. To understand these issues, we assemble a novel data set on 71 cardiothoracic surgeons who performed over 6,500 procedures during a period of 10 years since the introduction of a breakthrough surgical procedure. We find that as compared to related experience, surgeon focal experience has a greater effect on surgeon performance. We also demonstrate that sub-task experience has different, non-linear performance relationships for focal and related experience. Finally, we find that focal experience is more firm-specific than related experience and that non-firm experience reduces the learning rate for both focal and related experience. We discuss implications of our findings for healthcare delivery and operations management.
Article
Homophily in social relations results from both individual preferences and selective opportunities for interaction, but how these two mechanisms interact in large, contemporary organizations is not well understood. We argue that organizational structures and geography delimit opportunities for interaction such that actors have a greater level of discretion to choose their interaction partners within business units, job functions, offices and quasi-formal structures. This leads us to expect to find a higher proportion of homophilous interactions within these organizational structures than across their boundaries. We test our theory in an analysis of the rate of dyadic communication in an e-mail data set comprising thousands of employees in a large information technology firm. These findings have implications for research on homophily, gender relations in organizations, and formal and informal organizational structure.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.