This theoretical article re-examines the issue of relevance in Information Systems (IS) research. It argues that the commonly presented view, in which IT practitioners (operating in a restricted range of roles and organisational settings) are seen as representing "IS practice", is limiting. A call is made for a deeper understanding of the concept of relevance, driven by a more thorough
... [Show full abstract] consideration of the dimensions of practice. An 'Ecology of IS Practice' perspective is proposed to help achieve this. An ecological perspective places the individual practitioner within a nested series of contexts for 'IS in Practice'. IS research can be seen as occurring within, or between, the ecological levels of individual, group, organisation, industry, community, and society. An ecological perspective also provides a useful context for framing three key questions about the relevance of IS research: What issue should the research be about?, To whom should it be relevant?, and What outcomes are needed? These questions can be applied at all levels of the ecology, and across the boundaries of different levels. A fourth 'relevance question' therefore arises: At what level(s) of the social ecology should IS research be relevant? It is argued that the adoption of an ecological perspective has the potential to deliver an enriched understanding of the domain of 'IS Practice', emphasising the diversity of possible stakeholders for IS research, and by doing so, enlarging the relevance agenda so that it better delivers to the Vision for the IS field (Weber, 1997).