[Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: There is a perceived global need to bridge the existing gap between researchers and other stakeholders to make research more helpful and to realign “the mismatch between what clinical researchers do and what patients need”. The EMCDDA carried out a pilot analysis to explore the gaps in research on treatment for drug dependence as indicated by systematic reviewers of studies on effectiveness of interventions together with a stakeholder’s consultation to ensure a broader participation in the definition of research needs. The rough comparisons of the gaps identified by the researchers in the reviews and those suggested by the stakeholders reflect their different perception of research. The reviewers focus on the quality of studies and on how this may impair reaching conclusive evidence, while the stakeholders are more concerned by the management of effective interventions and by the needs of specific patients. With this exercise, the EMCDDA wants to contribute to the broader debate on how to translate evidence into action and it offers a possible way to support decision makers to set the health research agenda.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This is the report and recommendations of the Breaking Boundaries review of public involvement in health research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and Chaired by Simon Denegri, NIHR National Director for Patients and the Public in Research and Chair, INVOLVE
Full-text · Conference Paper · Mar 2015 · Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.
This publication is from a journal that may support self archiving.