Content uploaded by Pieter B. Pelser
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Pieter B. Pelser on Dec 23, 2013
Content may be subject to copyright.
Accepted by Benjamin vanEe: 28 Aug. 2013; published: 13 Sept. 2013
35
PHYTOTAXA
ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition)
ISSN
1179-3163 (online edition)
Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press
Phytotaxa 131 (1): 35–40 (2013)
www.mapress.com
/phytotaxa/
Correspondence
http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.131.1.6
Mt. Banahaw reveals: The resurrection and neotypification of the name Rafflesia
lagascae (Rafflesiaceae) and clues to the dispersal of Rafflesia seeds
PIETER B. PELSER
1
, DANIEL L. NICKRENT
2
, JOHN REY C. CALLADO
3
& JULIE F. BARCELONA
1
1
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand;
email: pieter.pelser@canterbury.ac.nz, julie.barcelona@canterbury.ac.nz.
2
Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 1125 Lincoln Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901-6509, USA.
3
Philippine National Herbarium (PNH), Botany Division, National Museum of the Philippines, P. Burgos St., Manila, Philippines.
The southeast Asian holoparasite genus Rafflesia Brown (1821: 207; Rafflesiaceae) is famous for producing
the largest flowers on record (Kuijt 1969). Following a series of discoveries of new Rafflesia species and
populations, the Philippines recently emerged as one of the centers of its diversity. It is home to no less than
ten currently recognized Rafflesia species (Barcelona et al. 2009, Balete et al. 2010). Here, we report two
discoveries that resulted from recent fieldwork in the Mts. Banahaw - San Cristobal Protected Landscape in
Luzon and show how these new data impact the taxonomy and biology of Philippine Rafflesia.
Resurrection and neotypification of the name Rafflesia lagascae (Rafflesiaceae)
Rafflesia manillana Teschemacher (1844: 65) was originally described from the island of Samar in the
Philippines, but until recently, extant populations by this name were only known from Luzon. In 2007,
however, Madulid et al. (2008) found a Rafflesia population on Samar. This population was located in the
municipality of Basey, which is the general area where the type of R. manillana was originally collected. This
type specimen was a set of three flower buds and is presumed lost (Madulid & Agoo 2008; Barcelona et al.
2009). Upon inspection of flowers from the Samar population, Madulid et al. (2008) concluded that these
plants belong to a different species than the Luzon populations referred to as R. manillana. They subsequently
described these Luzon populations as R. panchoana Madulid, Buot & Agoo (2008: 44), maintaining the name
R. manillana only for the population of plants from Samar. Barcelona et al. (2009) did not follow Madulid et
al. (2008) in recognizing the Luzon and Samar Rafflesia as distinct species. They pointed out that the
characters that were used by Madulid et al. (2008) to distinguish the two species are quite variable in the
Luzon populations and overlap with those reported from Samar. Furthermore, they concluded that
examination of more open flowers would be needed to confirm that the characters used by Madulid et al.
(2008) are consistent across individuals and populations.
In 2011 Barcelona visited the Samar population and was able to study many fresh flowers. This confirmed
the overlap in most character states between the Luzon and Samar flowers that Madulid et al. (2008) listed as
features distinguishing the two species. As discussed by Barcelona et al. (2009), many of these characters are
correlated with flower size. However, two characters indeed show consistent morphological differences,
although these are perhaps not as discrete as is suggested by Madulid et al. (2008): the diaphragm color, and
the relative size of the diaphragm aperture (Fig. 1). Rafflesia flowers from Luzon (Fig. 1A) have bicolored
diaphragms of which either the speckles or the background is concolorous with the perigone lobes. In
contrast, flowers from Samar (Fig. 1B) have whitish diaphragms, similar to those seen in R. lobata Galang &
Madulid (2006: 2). Moreover, flowers from Luzon typically have a much wider diaphragm aperture (i.e.
considerably wider than the diameter of the disk) than those from Samar. These morphological differences,
together with the disjunct distribution of the Luzon and Samar populations, may indicate a current absence of
gene flow between them, and that they merit taxonomic recognition as different species under a biological
species concept (Mayr 2000).
PELSER ET AL.36 • Phytotaxa 131 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press
Barcelona et al. (2009) argued that if the Luzon populations previously known as R. manillana indeed
represent a species distinct from the R. manillana populations on Samar, an earlier name, R. lagascae Blanco
(1845: 595), is available for the Luzon taxon, as opposed to the name R. panchoana. Rafflesia lagascae is one
of two Rafflesia species that Blanco (1845) described from Mt. Banahaw; the second being R. philippensis
Blanco (1845: 565). Most likely because Blanco did not preserve the specimens that he studied, and because
Rafflesia was no longer reported from Mt. Banahaw in the remainder of the 19
th
and 20
th
centuries, both names
were considered synonyms of R. manillana by later authors (e.g., Solms-Laubach 1891, 1901, Brown 1912,
Merrill 1923, Meijer 1997, Nais 2001).
In 2007, two separate teams of researchers, Barcelona et al. (2007) and Madulid et al. (2007) reported
Rafflesia plants on Mt. Banahaw that were morphologically distinct from those known as R. manillana
elsewhere in Luzon. The name R. philippensis was subsequently resurrected for these plants (Barcelona et al.
2009; Fig. 2A). Here, we report the finding of a second species of Rafflesia at the foot of Mt. Bananaw. This
species is conspecific with the Luzon populations previously known as R. manillana. This discovery confirms
that Blanco was correct in recognizing two distinct Rafflesia species in the area. In addition, it provides
further support for the conclusion that his R. lagascae is the earlier and valid name for R. panchoana. Because
the type specimen of R. lagascae collected by Azaola and presented to Blanco was not preserved, we
designate Barcelona 3819 with Pelser (CHR) as the neotype for this species:
Rafflesia lagascae Blanco (1845: 595; Fig. 1A)
Type:—PHILIPPINES. Luzon: Monte de Majaijai (Mt. Banahaw), 22 April 1840 (fide Solms-Laubach 1891), Azaola
s.n. (not preserved). Neotype (designated here):—PHILIPPINES. Luzon: Quezon Prov., Dolores Municipality,
Barangay Kinabuhayan, Bangkong Kahoy Valley, Mts. Banahaw – San Cristobal Protected Landscape, 14°2’56" N,
121°26'35"E, ca. 700 m, 3 April 2013, Barcelona 3819 with Pelser (CHR).
= Rafflesia panchoana Madulid, Buot & Agoo (2008: 44). Type:—PHILIPPINES. Luzon: Laguna Prov., Mt. Makiling,
1914, W.H. Brown s.n. (Species Blancoanae 535) (holotype: US904212).
Clues to the dispersal of Rafflesia seeds
In addition to rediscovering Mt. Banahaw’s second Rafflesia species, our fieldwork has contributed data that
may help resolve a long-standing secret about the life cycle of Rafflesia: the mode of seed dispersal. Rafflesia
fruits produce thousands of tiny seeds (ca. 0.5–0.75 x 0.3 mm) in leathery, dome-shaped, indehiscent berries
(Fig. 2B–D). These appear to rely on the destruction or decay of the fruit wall for the seeds to be dispersed
(Kuijt 1969). A wide variety of animals have been considered as potential dispersers of Rafflesia seeds
ranging from ants and termites to elephants, mice, pigs, and termite predators (Teijsmann 1856, Justesen
1922, Kuijt 1969, Nais 2001). To our knowledge, direct observations of seed dispersal have thus far only been
reported by Emmons et al. 1991, who observed a treeshrew (Tupaia tana) and squirrel (Callosciurus notatus)
feeding on Rafflesia fruits.
In November 2011, we encountered a fruit of R. philippensis in an advanced state of decay. After
removing some of the decaying fruit wall, we noticed the presence of numerous ants (Technomyrmex sp. and
Pheidologeton sp.) among the disintegrating tissue. Several of these ants were carrying Rafflesia seeds away
from the fruit (Fig. 2E–H). This discovery fits in well with Kuijt’s (1969) hypothesis that the chalazal swelling
of Rafflesia seeds (giving them the shape of a two-seeded peanut; Fig. 2D) might be an elaiosome. Elaiosomes
are characteristic oily appendages on seeds of myrmecochorous plants, such as arils, crests, etc. that offer food
bodies to ants (Jackson 1960). It certainly seems plausible that ants, attracted to a nutritious elaiosome, would
transport these seeds to their nests. There, they might germinate and infect the roots of a nearby vine of
Tetrastigma (Miquel 1863: 72) Planchon (1887: 423; Vitaceae; the only known host genus of Rafflesia).
Infection most likely takes place in the underground parts of Tetrastigma (Justesen 1922), because although it
is not uncommon to see Rafflesia buds and flowers emerging from the climbing parts of a Tetrastigma vine, all
Rafflesia species flower primarily at ground level. This finds some support from Teijsmann’s (1856)
experiments in which he successfully infected Tetrastigma by inserting Rafflesia seeds into slits that he cut in
its roots. Although it is entirely unknown how Rafflesia infects Tetrastigma in natural conditions, it is possible
Phytotaxa 131 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press • 37
MT. BANAHAW REVEALS
that this involves a mycorrhizal partner, as is observed in other holoparasitic plants with miniscule seeds, such
as Conopholis americana (Linnaeus 1767: 88) Wallroth (1825: 78) (Baird & Riopel 1986). Even though we
were not able to locate and excavate the ant nest and confirm the presence of Tetrastigma roots and/or
Rafflesia seedlings, our discovery revitalizes the ant-dispersal hypothesis. Detailed field studies are needed to
explore this further.
FIGURE 1. A. Rafflesia lagasacae, Mt. Banahaw, Luzon, Philippines; Barcelona 3819 with Pelser (neotype, CHR). B. Rafflesia
manillana, Samar Island Natural Park (SINP), Sitio Bagong Silang, Brgy. Guirang, Basey, Samar, Philippines. Photographs taken by
Pelser & Barcelona.
PELSER ET AL.38 • Phytotaxa 131 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 2. A–H. Rafflesia philippensis, Mt. Banahaw, Luzon, Philippines. A. Flower, Barcelona 3809 with Pelser (CANU). B–D.
Nearly mature fruit. B. Cross section of fruit. C. Seeds, 1 mm scale. D. Seeds. E–H. Ants (Technomyrmex sp. (F) and Pheidologeton
sp. (E, G, H)) carrying seeds (indicated with white arrows) from a decaying fruit. Photographs taken by Pelser & Barcelona.
Phytotaxa 131 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press • 39
MT. BANAHAW REVEALS
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the people of Barangay Kinabuhayan, Dolores, Quezon, especially Kagawad Jerry R.
Mendua, Ananias (Dingdong) M. Cahilo Sr., Richard (Bebot) Manao, Brgy. Captain Romeo R. Diala, ex-
Barangay Captain and Mrs. Angeles Coronado, the Protected Area Management Board (PAMB), Mts.
Banahaw – San Cristobal Protected Landscape and Protected Area Superintendent (PASu) Salud Pangan. For
field assistance in Samar Island National Park (SINP), we thank Guirang ex- Barangay Captain Ignacio
Gimbaolibot, Wilfredo G. Depalco, Judah Aliposa, and staff of DENR Region 8, namely, Eires M. Mate, Felix
D. Bernal, Paquito P. Dabuet, and Allan C. Reyna. Matt Walters prepared the ant and seed photos for
publication. Perry Archival C. Buenavente provided taxonomic identifications for the ants. This project was
supported by the National Geographic Society and the Marsden Fund Council from Government funding,
administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand.
References
Baird, W.V. & Riopel, J.L. (1986) The developmental anatomy of Conopholis americana (Orobanchaceae) seedling and
tubercles. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 710–
717.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b86-090
Balete, D.S., Pelser, P.B., Nickrent, D.L. & Barcelona, J.F. (2010) Rafflesia verrucosa (Rafflesiaceae), a new species of
small-flowered Rafflesia from eastern Mindanao, Philippines. Phytotaxa 10: 49–57.
Barcelona, J.F., Pelser, P.B. & Cajano, M.O. (2007) Rafflesia banahaw (Rafflesiaceae), a new species from Luzon,
Philippines. Blumea 52: 345–
350.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651907x609089
Barcelona, J.F., Pelser, P.B., Balete, D.S. & Co, L.L. (2009) Taxonomy, ecology, and conservation status of Philippine
Rafflesia. Blumea 54: 77–
93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651909x474122
Blanco F.M. (1845) Flora de Filipinas, ed. 2. M. Sanchez, Manila, 619 pp.
Brown, R. (1821) An account of a new genus of plants, named Rafflesia. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London
13: 201–234.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1821.tb00062.x
Brown, W.H. (1912) The relation of Rafflesia manillana to its host. The Philippine Journal of Science. C. Botany 7: 209–
226.
Emmons, L.H., Nias, J. & Briun, A. (1991) The fruit and consumers of Rafflesia keithii (Rafflesiaceae). Biotropica 23:
197–199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2388307
Galang, R. & Madulid, D.A. (2006) A second species of Rafflesia (Rafflesiaceae) from Panay Island, Philippines. Folia
Malaysiana
7: 1–8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4110994
Jackson, B.D. (1960) A glossary of botanic terms with their derivations and accent. Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.,
London, 481 pp.
Justesen, P.T. (1922) Morphological and biological notes on Rafflesia flowers observed in the highlands of mid-Sumatra.
Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 32: 64–87.
Kuijt, J. (1969) The biology of parasitic flowering plants. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 246
pp.
Linnaeus, C. 1767. Mantissa plantarum 1. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm. 142 pp.
Madulid, D.A., Villariba-Tolentino, C. & Agoo, E.M.G. (2007 [2006]). Rafflesia banahawensis (Rafflesiaceae), a new
species from Luzon, Philippines. Philippine Scientist
43: 43–51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3860/psci.v43i0.370
Madulid, D.A. & Agoo, E.M.G. (2008 [2007]) On the identity of Rafflesia manillana Teschem. (Rafflesiaceae).
Philippine Scientist 44: 57–
70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3860/psci.v44i0.379
Madulid, D.A., Buot, I.E. & Agoo, E.M.G. (2008 [2007]) Rafflesia panchoana (Rafflesiaceae), a new species from
Luzon island, Philippines. Acta Manilana 55: 43–
47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3860/acta.v55i0.1485
PELSER ET AL.40 • Phytotaxa 131 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press
Mayr, E. (2000) The biological species concept, in: Wheeler, Q.D. & Meier, E. (eds.) Species concepts and phylogenetic
theory: a debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 17–29.
Meijer, W. (1997) Rafflesiaceae. Flora Malesiana, Series 1 13: 1–42.
Merrill E.D. (1923) An enumeration of Philippine flowering plants Vol. 2. Bureau of Printing, Manila, 530 pp.
Miquel, F.A.W. (1863) Ampelideae novae. Annales Museum Botanicum Lugduno-Batavi 1: 72–101.
Nais, J. (2001) Rafflesia of the world. Sabah Parks, Kota Kinabalu, 260 pp.
Planchon, J.E. (1887) Ampelideae, in: De Candolle, A.L.P.P. & De Candolle, A.C. (eds.) Monographiae
phanerogamarum 5. Paris, pp. 305–637.
Solms-Laubach, H. (1891) Ueber die Species in der Gattung Rafflesia insonderheit ueber die auf dem Philippinen sich
findenden Arten. Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 9: 184–246.
Solms-Laubach, H. (1901) Rafflesiaceae. Das Pflanzenreich 4: 1–18.
Teijsmann, J.E. (1856) Nadere bijdrage tot de kennis van de voortteling van Rafflesia arnoldii R.Br. in 's Lands
Plantentuin te Buitenzorg. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlands Indië 12: 277–281.
Teschemacher, J.E. (1844) On a new species of Rafflesia, from Manilla. Boston Journal of Natural History 4: 63–66.
Wallroth, C.F.W. (1825) Orobanches generis diaskene. Fredericus Wilmans, Frankfurt, 80 pp.