[A retrospective follow-up study of prolonged nucleos(t)ide analogue and interferon combination therapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients]

Hospital of Infectious of Jinan, Jinan 250021, China.
Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology 04/2013; 21(4):267-70. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2013.04.007
Source: PubMed


To investigate the efficacy of a 96-week course of nucleos(t)ide analogue and interferon (IFN) combination therapy for achieving seroconversion at 24 weeks after completion in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
One-hundred-and-thirty-five CHB patients with positivity for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) were recruited for study between January 2005 and December 2008. All patients were given a 96-week course of nucleos(t)ide analogue (lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil) alone (monotherapy controls, n = 45) or in combination with IFN or Pegylated-IFN-alpha-2a (Peg-IFNa-2a) (n = 90). At treatment weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96, and at 24 weeks after treatment completion, serum samples were collected from all patients for assessment of biochemical, virological and serological responses to treatment. The biochemical response was indicated by normalization of the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level. The virologic response was indicated by a reduction in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level to less than 1000 copies/ml. The serological response was indicated by seroconversion of either HBeAg or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Statistical analysis was performed with the Chi-squared test.
Among the patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogue and IFN combination therapy, 41.1% (37/90) achieved HBeAg seroconversion and 18.9% (17/90) achieved HBsAg seroconversion at the end of treatment. However, significantly less of the patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogue monotherapy achieved HBeAg seroconversion and none achieved HBsAg seroconversion by end of treatment (33.3% and 0%, respectively; x2= 8.08, P less than 0.01 vs. the combination therapy group). Age stratification of the 17 HBsAg-seroconverted patients treated with combination therapy indicated that the HBsAg seroconversion rate was significantly higher in patients less than 30-years-old than those 30 and older (x2= 12.62 and 4.24, respectively, P less than 0.05). At post-treatment week 24, the 17 HBsAg-seroconverted patients treated with combination therapy showed HBsAg titers of less than 250 IU/ml; moreover, 11.8% (2/17) of these patients remained HBeAg-positive and 17.6% (3/17) showed abnormal ALT levels and elevated HBV DNA.
Prolonged nucleos(t)ide analogue plus IFN combination therapy can significantly improve the rate of HBsAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive CHB patients, and this treatment regimen is especially efficacious in patients under the age of 30.

15 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The clinical efficacy of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) combined with interferon (IFN) therapy vs. NAs monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether the NAs plus IFN regimen offers synergistic efficacy that justifies the cost and burden of such a combination therapy in CHB patients. Methods: Related publications covering the period of 1966 to July 2014 were identified through searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, WANFANG, and CNKI database. A total of 17 studies were enrolled, including 6 in English and 11 in Chinese. Then, we established a final list of studies for the meta-analysis by systematically grading the quality and eligibility of the identified individual studies. We used hepatitis B antigen (HBeAg) loss, HBV-DNA undetectable rate, HBeAg seroconversion, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, HBsAg seroconversion, and histological score at the end of treatment for efficacy evaluation. A quantitative meta-analysis (Review Manager, Version 5.1.0) was performed to assess the differences between NAs and IFN combination therapy and NAs monotherapy. Results: Our analysis demonstrated that HBeAg loss (RR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.32-2.26, p < 0.001), HBV-DNA undetectable rate (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.22-2.04, p < 0.001), HBeAg seroconversion (RR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.36-2.07, p < 0.001), and HBsAg loss (RR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.32-4.75, p < 0.001) in the combination therapy group were significantly higher than those in the monotherapy group. However, there were no significant differences in HBsAg seroconversion (RR = 4.25, 95% CI = 0.62-29.13, p = 0.14), sustained virological response rates, and biochemical response rates observed between the two groups. The results showed that the combination therapy group had more improved HBV histology than the NAs monotherapy group (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.93-1.39, p = 0.22). Conclusions: NAs and IFN or Peg-IFN combination therapy had a better efficacy in terms of HBeAg loss, HBV-DNA undetectable rate, HBeAg seroconversion, and HBsAg loss, compared to the NA monotherapy group at the end of treatment; however, there was no significant difference in HBsAg seroconversion between the two regimens.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2015 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health