Article

Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: A nationwide cohort study

Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.
The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society (Impact Factor: 2.43). 09/2013; 13(10). DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common degenerative spine diseases. Surgical options are largely divided into decompression only and decompression with arthrodesis. Recent randomized trials showed that surgery was more effective than nonoperative treatment for carefully selected patients with lumbar stenosis. However, some patients require reoperation because of complications, failure of bony fusion, persistent pain, or progressive degenerative changes, such as adjacent segment disease. In a previous population-based study, the 10-year reoperation rate was 17%, and fusion surgery was performed in 10% of patients. Recently, the lumbar fusion surgery rate has doubled, and a substantial portion of the reoperations are associated with a fusion procedure. With the change in surgical trends, the longitudinal surgical outcomes of these trends need to be reevaluated.

1 Follower
 · 
21 Reads
  • Source
    • "Although a statistically significant difference was not obtained after fusion surgery during the 5-year follow-up period, the reoperation rate might be higher in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients after fusion surgery with longer follow-up (Fig. 2). Diabetes might continuously influence reoperation rates through direct or indirect association with the aforementioned problems [4] [6] [8] [16] [19] [26] [28] [35]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diabetes is present in 5 - 20 % of patients undergoing spine surgeries and is a known risk factor for reoperation. Considering the chronicity of diabetes, its influence on the reoperation rate may differ over time. To present the relationship between diabetes and the reoperation rate over time. Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: A national health insurance database was used to identify a cohort of patients who underwent an initial surgery for lumbar degenerative disease in 2003 (n = 34,918). The primary end-point was any type of second lumbar surgery after fusion surgery (n = 4,792) or decompression surgery (n = 30,126) during the early (0 - postoperative 90 days), short-term (91 - 365 days) and mid-term (1 - 6 years) periods. All patients were followed-up until Dec. 2008. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to assess the adjusted reoperation rates in the diabetic patients. The incidence of diabetes in the present cohort was 24.5 % in the fusion group and 16.9 % in the decompression group. Overall, reoperation was performed in 13.2 % (631/4,792) of the patients after fusion surgery and in 14.0 % (4,214/30,126) of the patients after decompression surgery. After fusion surgery, diabetes did not make a significant difference in the reoperation rate during the entire follow-up period. After decompression surgery, the reoperation rate was not different during postoperative month 3, but diabetic patients showed a 1.2 - 1.4-times higher reoperation rate during postoperative 3 months to 5 years (p < 0.01). The study did not find a relationship between diabetes at the time of surgery and the reoperation rate during the early postoperative period. Thereafter, the reoperation rate was not higher after fusion surgery in diabetic patients, but it was higher after decompression surgery. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015 · The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Object: Parallel advancements in image guidance technology and minimal access techniques continue to push the frontiers of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). While traditional intraoperative imaging remains widely used, newer platforms, such as 3D-fluoroscopy, cone-beam CT, and intraoperative CT/MRI, have enabled safer, more accurate instrumentation placement with less radiation exposure to the surgeon. The goal of this work is to provide a review of the current uses of advanced image guidance in MISS. Methods: The authors searched PubMed for relevant articles concerning MISS, with particular attention to the use of image-guidance platforms. Pertinent studies published in English were further compiled and characterized into relevant analyses of MISS of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral regions. Results: Fifty-two studies were included for review. These describe the use of the iso-C system for 3D navigation during C1-2 transarticular screw placement, the use of endoscopic techniques in the cervical spine, and the role of navigation guidance at the occipital-cervical junction. The authors discuss the evolving literature concerning neuronavigation during pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine in the setting of infection, trauma, and deformity surgery and review the use of image guidance in transsacral approaches. Conclusions: Refinements in image-guidance technologies and minimal access techniques have converged on spinal pathology, affording patients the ability to undergo safe, accurate operations without the associated morbidities of conventional approaches. While percutaneous transpedicular screw placement is among the most common procedures to benefit from navigation, other areas of spine surgery can benefit from advances in neuronavigation and further growth in the field of image-guided MISS is anticipated.
    Preview · Article · Aug 2013 · Neurosurgical FOCUS
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Object: Symptomatic adjacent-segment lumbar disease (ASLD) after lumbar fusion often requires subsequent surgical intervention. The authors report utilizing cortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screw fixation with intraoperative CT (O-arm) image-guided navigation to stabilize spinal levels in patients with symptomatic ASLD. This unique technique results in the placement of 2 screws in the same pedicle (1 traditional pedicle trajectory and 1 CBT) and obviates the need to remove preexisting instrumentation. Methods: The records of 5 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with CBT and posterior interbody grafting for ASLD were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent screw trajectory planning with the O-arm in conjunction with the StealthStation navigation system. Basic demographics, operative details, and radiographic and clinical outcomes were obtained. Results: The average patient age was 69.4 years (range 58-82 years). Four of the 5 surgeries were performed with the Minimal Access Spinal Technologies (MAST) Midline Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF) system. The average operative duration was 218 minutes (range 175-315 minutes). In the entire cohort, 5.5-mm cortical screws were placed in previously instrumented pedicles. The average hospital stay was 2.8 days (range 2-3 days) and there were no surgical complications. All patients had more than 6 months of radiographic and clinical follow-up (range 10-15 months). At last follow-up, all patients reported improved symptoms from their preoperative state. Radiographic follow-up showed Lenke fusion grades of A or B. Conclusions: The authors present a novel fusion technique that uses CBT pedicle screw fixation in a previously instrumented pedicle with intraoperative O-arm guided navigation. This method obviates the need for hardware removal. This cohort of patients experienced good clinical results. Computed tomography navigation was critical for accurate CBT screw placement at levels where previous traditional pedicle screws were already placed for symptomatic ASLD.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2014 · Neurosurgical FOCUS
Show more