Chapter

Emotion Regulation Therapy

In book: Handbook of Emotion Regulation, Edition: 2nd, Chapter: 28, Publisher: Guilford Publishers, Editors: James J. Gross, pp.469-487

ABSTRACT

Generalized anxiety disorder and major depression (often termed “distress disorders”; see Watson, 2005) are commonly comorbid and appear to be characterized by temperamental features that reflect heightened sensitivity to underlying motivational systems related to threat/safety and reward/loss. Further, individuals with these disorders tend to perseverate (i.e., worry, ruminate) as a way to manage this motivationally relevant distress and often utilize these self-conscious processes to the detriment of engaging new contextual learning. Emotion Regulation Therapy integrates principles from traditional and contemporary cognitive behavioral treatments (e.g., skills training & exposure) with basic and translational findings from affect science to offer a blueprint for improving intervention by focusing on the motivational responses and corresponding regulatory characteristics of individuals with distress
disorders. This emphasis on affect science permits identification of candidate mechanisms of treatment in terms of core disruptions of normative cognitive, emotional, and motivational systems, which in turn, helps generate more targeted solutions for clients to utilize adaptive ways to cope or compensate for these core deficits. In essence, contrasting a client’s difficulties with what we understand as normative functioning allows us to generate theory-driven hypotheses that form that basis of our case conceptualization and treatment planning. Outcome and mechanism data provide preliminary support for the use of ERT to treat distress disorders.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: David M Fresco, Dec 14, 2013
    • "Within this Special Issue, we invited researchers to contribute empirical papers illustrating assessment paradigms and/or treatment approaches that incorporate physiological measures in clinical assessments of children and adolescents (Aldao and De Los Reyes 2015; De Los Reyes and Aldao 2015). We requested articles focusing on physiological indices known to reflect emotion regulation processes.The emotion regulation framework has increasingly demonstrated utility in characterizing patterns of dysfunction within psychopathology (e.g., Aldao et al. 2010; Kring and Sloan 2009) and it has been incorporated into the theoretical foundations and techniques underlying manualized psychosocial interventions (e.g., Barlow et al. 2004; Bilek and Ehrenrich- May 2012; Hayes et al. 1999; Linehan 1993; Mennin and Fresco 2013; Roemer et al. 2008). From an RDoC standpoint, emotion regulation is a particularly important process because it cuts across several domains of functioning (e.g., negative affect, positive affect, social processes, and regulatory systems) and units of analyses relevant to this initiative (e.g., subjective feelings, physiological arousal, and neurobiological circuitry). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article serves as the introduction to the Special Section called “Toward Implementing Physiological Measures in Clinical Assessments of Adult Mental Health.” As such, it provides an overview of the importance of integrating assessments of physiological and subjective processes in mental health assessments and discusses the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative. In addition, it summarizes the findings from the four empirical studies published in the Special Section. Collectively, these studies sought to illustrate how physiological assessments can be incorporated in mental health assessments conducted in applied research and clinic settings. In all, we hope that this Special Section will inspire the type of interdisciplinary research spanning basic and applied work that will be critical to advancing the RDoC initiative.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2015 · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
    • "It is safe to assume that the experience of anxiety is familiar to most people, reflecting the capacity of our brains to imagine, anticipate, adapt, and plan for future goals and events (Mennin and Fresco, 2014). In this sense, anxiety is advantageous (Barlow, 2000). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a psychological disorder characterized by chronic and severe worry. The past thirty years have seen a surge in the understanding of GAD, and specific advances have been made in how the disorder is conceptualized and treated within the field of psychology. However, despite these advances, GAD remains the most treatment refractory anxiety disorder. The current chapter, therefore, provides an overview of the current conceptualization of GAD, including its key symptoms and features. In addition, this chapter highlights many of the specific theoretical and treatment advances of the past several decades. Finally, this chapter will explore future directions that the field may be able to take in an attempt to better understand and treat this disorder.
    No preview · Chapter · Mar 2015
  • Source
    • "The inclusion of treatment components that target cognitions , emotions, and behavior designed to promote flexibility should inform our treatments for GAD by encouraging alternatives to rigid responding to anxiety and increase behavioral action rather than avoidance. Emotion Regulation Therapy (Fresco et al. 2013; Mennin and Fresco 2013a), approaches inflexibility by working with the client to identify contexts in which rigidity in action, thoughts, and feelings typically arise. Clients practice attending to their emotional experience during these situations (or their imaginal presentation) without attempting to take any immediate actions to achieve safety or desired goals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Seventy-eight undergraduates, 39 with self-reported generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), completed measures of mood and explanatory flexibility (the capacity to assign causes to negative events with a balance of historical and contextual factors) prior to and directly after a musical priming challenge that consisted of listening to negatively-valenced emotional music and thinking about a personally relevant negative event. After the emotion evocation, participants also completed a measure of state emotion regulation. Despite comparable increases in negative affect, GAD analogues evidenced drops in explanatory flexibility whereas non-GAD Controls did not. Drops in explanatory flexibility among GAD analogues covaried significantly with lack of emotional clarity. Findings suggest that for individuals with GAD, emotionally evocative experiences may result in a constricted perspective when apprehending the causes for negative events. This perspective may serve to dampen arousal, but perhaps at the cost of failing to inform one’s actions with important emotional information.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · Cognitive Therapy and Research
Show more

Questions & Answers about this publication

  • David M Fresco added an answer in Abnormal Psychology:
    Can anyone advise me on papers about how high levels of neuroticism can be a barrier to therapeutic treatment? And how this is best prevented.
    Especially for individuals in treatment for social anxiety disorder and major depression.
    David M Fresco
    Here is a paper by Olatunji and colleagues that is a meta-analysis showing how neuroticism complicates treatment for mood and anxiety disoders:

    Olatunji, B. O., Cisler, J. M., & Tolin, D. F. (2010). A meta-analysis of the influence of comorbidity on treatment outcome in the anxiety disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(6), 642–654. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.008.

    Here are a couple of papers that we have published that offer a theoretical account from an affect science perspective as to how and why:

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256419569_Emotion_Regulation_Therapy?ev=prf_pub

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248391117_What_me_worry_and_ruminate_about_DSM-5_and_RDoC_The_importance_of_targeting_negative_self-referential_processing?ev=prf_pub
    • Source
      [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
      ABSTRACT: Generalized anxiety disorder and major depression (often termed “distress disorders”; see Watson, 2005) are commonly comorbid and appear to be characterized by temperamental features that reflect heightened sensitivity to underlying motivational systems related to threat/safety and reward/loss. Further, individuals with these disorders tend to perseverate (i.e., worry, ruminate) as a way to manage this motivationally relevant distress and often utilize these self-conscious processes to the detriment of engaging new contextual learning. Emotion Regulation Therapy integrates principles from traditional and contemporary cognitive behavioral treatments (e.g., skills training & exposure) with basic and translational findings from affect science to offer a blueprint for improving intervention by focusing on the motivational responses and corresponding regulatory characteristics of individuals with distress disorders. This emphasis on affect science permits identification of candidate mechanisms of treatment in terms of core disruptions of normative cognitive, emotional, and motivational systems, which in turn, helps generate more targeted solutions for clients to utilize adaptive ways to cope or compensate for these core deficits. In essence, contrasting a client’s difficulties with what we understand as normative functioning allows us to generate theory-driven hypotheses that form that basis of our case conceptualization and treatment planning. Outcome and mechanism data provide preliminary support for the use of ERT to treat distress disorders.
      Full-text · Chapter · Dec 2013

    + 1 more attachment

  • David M Fresco added an answer in Mindfulness:
    Is Mindfulness an effective treatment?
    Mindfulness is used for cognitive therapy, stress reduction, mind-fitness training for the military (pre- and post-deployment), cancer treatment, education, sports performance, etc. What are your experiences with Mindfulness? Is Mindfulness an effective therapy? What environments would Mindfulness not be effective in?
    David M Fresco
    I think it's important to be clear on the definition of several terms in the original question. First, what do you mean by mindfulness? This term gets bandied about quite a bit and probably co-opted in ways that distort, denude, and denature the meaning. For instance in the world of psychotherapy, a broader array of approaches get lumped under the mindfulness umbrella. In the narrowest sense, mindfulness interventions involve minimally some form of formal sitting practice (e.g., breath awareness, gentle yoga, body scan, etc.) and possibly some mindfulness in daily life. In systems such as DBT, ACT, etc., daily sitting practice may or may not be part of the approach. Conversely, MBSR, MBCT and emotion regulation therapy (ERT; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235510892_Emotion_Regulation_Therapy_for_Generalized_Anxiety_Disorder; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256419569_Emotion_Regulation_Therapy?ev=prf_pub) do incorporate sitting practice as an important part of their approach. At the risk of being called an elitist or creating an in-group/out-group scenario, I tend to use the more restrictive definition of mindfulness to approaches that require formal daily practice at a set-aside time each day. This definition is closer to canonical Buddhism and sets what I believe to be a reasonable lower limit to what is in and what is out.

    Next, it's important to operationally define therapy. Jon Kabat-Zinn has been careful NOT to call MBSR therapy. When I received MBSR training from Jon and Saki Santorelli, they were both very careful to call MBSR a training, and that each meeting was a class led by a teacher, not a therapist. In fact, MBSR teachers come from all walks of life and there is no hard and fast requirements for what formal education beyond their training in MBSR. In the world of psychotherapy, the only mindfulness enriched treatments that use the more restrictive definition of mindfulness that I have suggested, that are meant for the acute care of a psychiatric condition are ERT, Acceptance Based Behavior Therapy (ABBT), and mindfulness based relapse prevention (MBRP). There are some trials with MBSR and MBCT with acutely ill individuals, but Segal and colleagues still are cautious to say MBCT is for relapse prevention.

    Finally, here are two good meta-analyses on mindfulness enriched treatments:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764203

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848393/
    • Source
      [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
      ABSTRACT: Despite the success of cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) for emotional disorders, a sizable subgroup of patients with complex clinical presentations, such as patients with generalized anxiety disorder, fails to evidence adequate treatment response. Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) integrates facets of traditional and contemporary CBTs, mindfulness, and emotion-focused interventions within a framework that reflects basic and translational findings in affect science. Specifically, ERT is a mechanism-targeted intervention focusing on patterns of motivational dysfunction while cultivating emotion regulation skills. Open and randomized controlled psychotherapy trials have demonstrated considerable preliminary evidence for the utility of this approach as well as for the underlying proposed mechanisms. This article provides an illustration of ERT through the case of “William.” In particular, this article includes a case-conceptualization of William from an ERT perspective while describing the flow and progression of the ERT treatment approach.
      Full-text · Article · Feb 2013 · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

    + 1 more attachment

  • David M Fresco added an answer in Resilience:
    Is anyone aware of recent research on Dollard and Millers Aggression-Frustration hypothesis for understanding Depression?
    Before behavioural science's ascendancy and the dominance of CBT as a dominant treatment choice for depression, Dollard and Miller were working on a more existential framework for understanding the roots of aggression, called the Frustration-Aggression hypothesis. Dollard and Miller's Aggression-Frustration Hypothesis as a way of understanding depression has been neglected in recent years. I am interested in exploring the current relevance of the Aggression-Frustration Hypothesis in understanding depression - if depression can be construed as internalised rage/aggression how is that linked to externalised aggression/irritability? Are there any links between aggression/irritability and anxiety? any links with one's ability to self-sooth? tolerance of vulnerable feelings? resilience?
    David M Fresco
    Not exactly an answer to your question, but we have been examining themes consistent with Dollard an Miller in terms of risk/reward conflicts that have some relevance to depression.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256419569_Emotion_Regulation_Therapy?ev=prf_pub

    and

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235510892_Emotion_Regulation_Therapy_for_Generalized_Anxiety_Disorder?ev=prf_pub
    • Source
      [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
      ABSTRACT: Generalized anxiety disorder and major depression (often termed “distress disorders”; see Watson, 2005) are commonly comorbid and appear to be characterized by temperamental features that reflect heightened sensitivity to underlying motivational systems related to threat/safety and reward/loss. Further, individuals with these disorders tend to perseverate (i.e., worry, ruminate) as a way to manage this motivationally relevant distress and often utilize these self-conscious processes to the detriment of engaging new contextual learning. Emotion Regulation Therapy integrates principles from traditional and contemporary cognitive behavioral treatments (e.g., skills training & exposure) with basic and translational findings from affect science to offer a blueprint for improving intervention by focusing on the motivational responses and corresponding regulatory characteristics of individuals with distress disorders. This emphasis on affect science permits identification of candidate mechanisms of treatment in terms of core disruptions of normative cognitive, emotional, and motivational systems, which in turn, helps generate more targeted solutions for clients to utilize adaptive ways to cope or compensate for these core deficits. In essence, contrasting a client’s difficulties with what we understand as normative functioning allows us to generate theory-driven hypotheses that form that basis of our case conceptualization and treatment planning. Outcome and mechanism data provide preliminary support for the use of ERT to treat distress disorders.
      Full-text · Chapter · Dec 2013

    + 1 more attachment

  • David M Fresco added an answer in Psychiatry:
    Which type of treatment is more effective for a generalized anxiety disorder, pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy?
    Which type of treatment is more effective for a generalized anxiety disorder, pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy?
    David M Fresco
    If you want an answer from the world of RCTs, the answer appears to be that ADM and psychotherapy are efficacious, but as compared to other disorders (e.g., MDD, social phobia, etc.), the effect sizes are relatively smaller. Also, when more stringent criteria for treatment response are applied (e.g., high endstate functioning), patients with GAD fare less well. There are also the findings from STAR*D where anxious depression were most refractory to ADM even when medication algorithms were applied. We are working up the trial papers from our ERT trials where we have found impressive improvements for GAD patients as well as GAD+MDD patients. This paper, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235510892_Emotion_Regulation_Therapy_for_Generalized_Anxiety_Disorder?ev=prf_pub, and our chapter that is coming out in James Gross' Handbook of Emotion https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256419569_Emotion_Regulation_Therapy?ev=prf_pub provides an overview of our findings.
    • Source
      [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
      ABSTRACT: Despite the success of cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) for emotional disorders, a sizable subgroup of patients with complex clinical presentations, such as patients with generalized anxiety disorder, fails to evidence adequate treatment response. Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) integrates facets of traditional and contemporary CBTs, mindfulness, and emotion-focused interventions within a framework that reflects basic and translational findings in affect science. Specifically, ERT is a mechanism-targeted intervention focusing on patterns of motivational dysfunction while cultivating emotion regulation skills. Open and randomized controlled psychotherapy trials have demonstrated considerable preliminary evidence for the utility of this approach as well as for the underlying proposed mechanisms. This article provides an illustration of ERT through the case of “William.” In particular, this article includes a case-conceptualization of William from an ERT perspective while describing the flow and progression of the ERT treatment approach.
      Full-text · Article · Feb 2013 · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

    + 1 more attachment