... In most cases, alternative lipids containing reduced levels of C 18 polyunsaturated fatty acids (C 18 PUFAs), particularly 18:2n-6, appear to have less of an effect on tissue fatty acid profile than lipid sources rich in C 18 PUFAs (Laporte and Trushenski, 2011;Trushenski et al., 2011aTrushenski et al., , 2011bTrushenski et al., , 2011cTrushenski et al., , 2013bWoitel et al., 2014aWoitel et al., , 2014b. Increasing dietary levels of SFAs and MUFAs, in lieu of C 18 PUFAs, appears advantageous in terms of supporting growth, maintaining tissue fatty acid profile (Trushenski et al., 2008(Trushenski et al., , 2011aTrushenski and Kanczuzewski, 2013;Turchini et al., 2009Turchini et al., , 2011aWoitel et al., 2014a), and meeting LC-PUFA requirements (Trushenski et al., 2013a(Trushenski et al., , 2013bTurchini et al., 2009Turchini et al., , 2011a, though these effects have not been observed in all taxa (Mulligan and Trushenski, 2013;Trushenski et al., 2015;Turchini et al., 2013). The latter results notwithstanding, for some taxa, choice of alternative lipid source matters and dietary fatty acid composition, particularly the balance of SFAs, MUFAs, and C 18 PUFAs, may influence the outcome of attempts to spare or replace fish oil. ...